|Publication number||US3308528 A|
|Publication date||Mar 14, 1967|
|Filing date||Nov 6, 1963|
|Priority date||Nov 6, 1963|
|Publication number||US 3308528 A, US 3308528A, US-A-3308528, US3308528 A, US3308528A|
|Inventors||Bullard Robert L, Hasbrouck Robert A, Schlemmer Philip S, Thun Rudolf E|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (3), Referenced by (40), Classifications (15)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
United States Patent 3,308,528 FABRICATION 0F CERMET FILM RESISTORS TO CLOSE TOLERANCES Robert L. Bullard, Wappiugers Falls, Robert A. Hasbrouck, Saugerties, Philip S. Schlemmer, Hyde Park, and Rudolf E. Thun, Poughkeepsie, N.Y., assignors to International Business Machines Corporation, New York, N.Y., a corporation of New York Filed Nov. 6, 1963, Ser. No. 321,928 2 Claims. (Cl. 29-155.7)
This invention relates to film electronics manufacture, and more particularly to the fabrication of film electronics panels having a multiplicity of cermet resistors wherein the ohmic value of the resistors is to be held to close tolerances. No. 182,818 filed Mar. 27, 1962 (now U.S. Patent No. 3,261,082 issued July 19, 1966) having a common assignee with this application, is directed to the general proposition of tailoring a film resistor by subjecting it to an electrical impulse. This application is directed to the peculiar problem of trimming cermet film resistors.
Cermet resistors, and more particularly chrom um-silicon monoxide thin film resistors have found considerable acceptance in the manufacture of film electronic panels because such materials can be vacuum-deposited by methods and equipment which are compatible with other steps in the fabrication of such panels, and may be made to yield a resistivity of the high ohms per square desired for compact circuitry panels.
The manufacture of optimum or even successful cermet resistors is not without problems, however. It is difficult or impossible to deposit a myriad of such resistors on a circuit panel in such manner that each has precisely its planned geometry, thickness and composition. Moreover, the opportunities for selection or mechanical trimming in order to bring resistors into tolerance are limited since, on the one hand, it is often desirable that as many circuits as possible be deposited in an integral unit on a single substrate, and, on the other hand, the individual resistors are likely to be so small and so closely located adjacent to, over, or under other elements as to be difficult to work upon by any mechanical or other grossly obtrusive means. Also, cermet resistors have the peculiarity of being highly susceptible to absorption of elements from the air when at an elevated temperature. Accordingly, it has become a practice to encapsulate cermet film resistors completely in a protective material such as silicon monoxide at the earliest practicable step in the manufacturing process, even before the resistors are annealed.
The annealing process is provided to bring about changes in the internal structure of the cermets whereby subsequent exposure to operating or other anticipated environmental temperatures will not cause significant alteration in the ohmic value of the resistors. nealing the ohmic value of the resistors decreases toward their design value, but there is little opportunity to treat separate resistors of a multiplicity on a common substrate individually. Thus, the non-uniformity among the several resistors of a plurality on a common substrate occurring at the time of deposition is perpetuated through the conventional annealing step.
One might expect that since each resistor is encapsulated in silicon monoxide, it would be impracticableto attempt to apply heat to resistors on an individual basis. Since silicon monoxide is a good heat insulator, it might be expected that by the time externally applied heat had very much effect on one resistor it would also have an undesirable effect on its neighbors. On the other hand, one might expect the same insulating environment to result in confining the heat in a particular resistor in such A prior, co-pending U.S. application, Ser.
During the an-' with the undercoat 12 to 3,308,528 Patented Mar. 14, 1967 ICC manner that if heat were applied internally to such a resistor rapidly enough to avoid affecting its neighbors, hot spots within the resistor would result in its destruction and defeat for the method.
However, another characteristic of cermet resistors overcomes this difficulty. Since cermet resistors decrease in ohmic value upon application of heat, internally generated joule heat serves to effect the greatest alteration on the most resistive spots in the resistor so that hot spots tend to be eliminated and the application of such joule heat equalized everywhere within the resistor. In accordance with preferred embodiments of the present invention such joule heat is applied to the resistors on an individual basis, by an apparatus which makes contact I with lands connected to opposite ends of a resistor for passing current through the same and includes automatic means for measuring the ohmic value of the resistor and terminating the joule current promptly as the design value is reached. In this way, adjustment of individual resistors can be undertaken with rapidity, both to expedite the procedure and to guard against unwanted propagation of the heat to adjacent elements, and yet without danger of overshooting the mark. The silicon monoxide encapsulation of each resistor provides an individual oven or enclosure for the cermet element thereof which not only provides a degree of heat isolation, but, more importantly affords an air-free environment for the cermet during the joule heat treatment.
Accordingly, it is a primary object of this invention to provide an accurate and facile means of producing cermet film resistors to very closely toleranced ohmic value.
It is another object of the invention to produce resistors as aforesaid in a manner which does not expose the resistors or associated or adjacent parts to seriously destructive or damaging influences.
It is yet another object of the invention to provide in a process as aforeclescribed, an improved means of adjusting the values of individual cermet resistors in a multiplicity of such resistors on a single, integral, film electronics panel.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following, more particular description of the preferred embodiment of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawing.
FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a cermet film resistor which may be brought into closely toleranced ohmic value in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a typical manufacturing process for preparing the resistor of FIG. 1, in-
cluding the final step of adjusting or trimming its resistance in accordance with the present invention; and
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of an apparatus which may be employed to treat and monitor the resistor of FIG. 1 in accordance with the process step of FIG. 2.
The resistor shown in FIG. 1 is an example of the film electronic structures the resistive element of which can be brought into closely toleranced stable values in accordance with the invention. Typically, the structure may include a glass or other suitable substrate 10* which forms a mechanical base upon which has been deposited a layer of silicon monoxide 12 over which the cermet resistance material 14 is laid down. Copper or other suitably conductive terminals 16, 18 provide electrical connection to the opposite ends of the resistance film 14, and an overcoat of silicon monoxide is provided which cooperates complete encapsulation of the resistance element 14. Thus, the cermet of the resistance element 14 is protected from the action of the atmosphere.
The techniques for preparation of film electronics elements such as shown in FIG. 1 are well known and it is also well known that the exercise of care in the deposition of the various layers can result in reasonably repeatable results, that is, resistors which have, after an nealing, an ohmic value within five or ten percent of their planned or nominal value; The substrate 10 utilized may be glass polished to a surface roughness of fifty angstrom units and an over-all flatness of of an inch across the working area of a substrate which will receive a multiplicity of such resistors, typically four by five inches in dimension. All of the layers are deposited by evaporation in vacuo, and process parameters such as vacuum chamber pressure, substrate temperature, evaporator geometry, evaporation rate, film thickness and film composition are closely controlled. Thus, the chamber pressure may be monitored with ionization gauges, and substrate temperatures measured with thermo-couples and controlled to within 10 C. by appropriate heater control circuitry. A chromium underfiash 16a, 18a may be used prior to deposition of the copper terminal or land elements 16, 18 to assure good adhesion, and evaporation rates for these metallic parts and the silicon monoxide encapsulating layers 12, 20 may be controlled by an ion gauge rate monitor of the type having a heated collector for continued accuracy during its operation. The thickness of the resistance film 14 itself can be estimated by utilization of a test slide within the evaporation chamber which is connected to a resistance meter.
Typically, the silicon monoxide is deposited at a substarte temperature of 350 C., a pressure of 2 l0- torr, and a deposition of 25 angrstrom units per second. Chromium and copper for the elements 16, 1 8 may be deposited at a substrate temperature of 160 C. and a pressure of X10 torr, the chromium underfiash being sublimed from an open tungsten boat at 3 angstrom units per second and the copper deposited thereover from a radiantly heated baflled carbon crucible at 10 angstrom units per second. The most critical element, the cermet film 14 itself, may be deposited by flash evaporation of mixed chromium-silicon monoxide powders at a substrate temperature of 160 C. and a pressure of 5-10 10- torr. As one example, the resistive film 14 may have a resistivity of 300 to 400 ohms per square as deposited, which resistivity is reduced to about 250 ohms'per square by annealing. Such a cemet film may be formed from 70 atomic percent chromium and 30 percent silicon monoxide and may be in the order of 90 to 100 angstrom units thick. However, by varying the atomic percentages of chromium and silicon monoxide and thickness of the deposit, resistivities ranging from 10 ohms per square to megohms per square may be fabricated.
Referring to FIG. 2, the foregoing typical deposition steps may be summarized as a first step 30 of depositing a 5,000 angstrom unit underlayer 12 on a clean substrate 10, followed by a second step 32 comprising the flash evaporation of premixed chromium-silicon monoxide powders, 70 atomic percent chromium-30 percent silicon monoxide, to form the cemet film 14 having an unannealed resistivity of 300 to 400 ohms per square. In the next step 34, 5,000 angstrom units of copper with a 300 angstrom unit underflash of chromium are deposited to form theland or terminal elements 16, 18 and then in step 36, a 10,000 angstrom overlay 20 of silicon monoxide is deposited over the resistor material 14. All of the steps to this point may be undertaken in a continuous process vacuum apparatus with masks brought into place at the various stages of the operation to define the geometries of the several layers. In any case, it is preferable that the cermet element 14 be covered and encapsulated by the silicon monoxide layers 12, 20 before ever being exposed to the air at an elevated temperature. It is a feature and advantage of the present invention that no modification or interruption of this encapsulation is necessary to achieve closely toleranced results.
In the preferred embodiment of the process of the invention, as in the prior art, the foregoing steps are followed by an oven annealing step 38 which is carried out at about 350 to 475 C. in a reducing atmosphere of forming gas (10% hydrogen, argon) to protect the exposed copper land parts 16, 18 until a reduced, operationally stable resistance value is reached. This so-called annealing step brings about changes in the cermet as a function of the time and tempearture of the annealing. The resulting gradual reduction of the resistivity of the cermet is monitored. during the annealing, and the product pieces are taken out of the oven when a certain resistivity is reached. This heat treatment has been found to result in resistors whose value is stable at operating temperatures below the annealing temperature.
In the prior art, the annealing step aims to achieve the design or nominal resistivity of, for example, 250 ohms per square :5%. In accordance with the present invention, the annealing is stopped somewhat short of the goal, such as at the nominal resistivity +10/-0%, and the final adjustment to the design or nominal resistivity is made by the trimming step 40 of the invention. Alternatively, the annealing step3 8 can be omitted altogether, and, as indicated by the dotted line 42 in FIG. 2 the entire heat stabilizing and adjusting process can be carried out by the joule heat procedure of the invention.
The trimming step 40 is carried out by passing current through the resistor so as to produce joule or re sistive heating therein in such concentration and for such a time as to bring the stabilized resistance of the cermet element to, or closer to, the design or nominal objective for this value. This is accomplished by connecting the resistor into suitable circuitry by use of its own terminals, without in any way disrupting the silicon monoxide overcoat 20 which protects the cermet film 14 of the resistor device 22. Thus, the silicon monoxide undercoat-overcoat encapsulation 12, 20 continues to protect the cermet film 14 during joule heating of the same pursuant to the trimming step.
This procedure may be carried out with facility by use of an apparatus of the kind shown in FIG. 3. -It will be understood that the resistor 22 to be trimmed may be, and usually is, one of a multiplicity on a single substrate 10, the substrate 10 being for this purpose extensive compared to the area covered by a single resistor 22, as indicated by the broken line portions 42, 44 thereof. Thus, the apparatus of FIG. 3 may be duplicated a plurality of times in a jig adapted to treat the number of resistors 22 on a single substrate at the same time. It is nevertheless desirable that the treatment of each resistor be an individual matter, for enabling close, individual trimming of each resistor. Thus, the circuit of FIG. 3 is typical of that which may be employed for treatment of a single resistor or with others l ke it in a jig, for simultaneous treatment of a plurality of resistors.
In the apparatus of FIG. 3, the power for joule heating is applied to the resistor through contacts 46, 48 which bear against the exposed surfaces of the resistor terminals 16, 18 for connecting them to an electrical power source preferably in the form of a constant current generator 50. As the cermet film 14 within the resistor 22 is subjected to the resulting joule heat, during the trimming operation, its resistivity will decrease. Therefore, a constant current generator is a preferred form of power supply since the rate of resistance heating will decrease somewhat as the nominal or final resistance value is approached, rather than the converse which would occur in the case of a constant voltage supply. For minimizing inaccuracies due to contact resistance, it is preferred that the resistance value of the.
element 22 being trimmed be monitored through a separate pair or containers 52, 54 which also contact the resistor terminal lands 16, 18. 'The several cont actors 46, 48, 50, 52 may be in the form of stainless steel rods the ends of which have been lapped to a smooth, transverse, planar shape, and are spring-mounted so as to press firmly against the terminal lands 16, 18 of the resistor.
and any slight discoloration of the terminal lands 16, 18 can be cleaned olT afterward with a suitable etch. In a few cases, as shown in some of the examples in Table I below, it is necessary to go to higher heat application The resistivity monitoring contactors 52, 54 are con- 5 rates in order to move the value of the resistance. nected in a circuit which may include a standard voltage These conditions are encountered in the cermet mixes source 56 and a comparator circuit 53. The polarity having a very high proportion of chromium such as the relation of the output of the standard voltage source 90 percent chromium cermet or in cases where the re- 56 is made the same as that of the current generator sistivity as deposited has required long, high temperature 50, as indicated on the drawing, and the function of the 10 annealing. comparator circuit 58 is to yield an output whenever Table I is a correlation of data, showing the interrelathe potential at contactor 52 drops in magnitude below tion of certain parameters in the carrying out of the that at output line 60 of the standard voltage source. process in accordance with the invention. In the cases Any convenient circuit can be used for the comparaof sample #3, 4 and 7, the resistors were left in the hot tor 58; as a simple example a high gain, saturating amplivacuum chamber after deposition of the SiO overcoat unfier could be utilized, as will be obvious to those skilled til they had reached a reduced, substantially stabilized in the electrical arts. The output of the comparator 58 value. Thus, the as deposited resistivity was not meascontrols a shunt 62, 64 across the current generator 50. ured, and there is no oven anneal data, per se.
TABLE 1 Deposition Anneal Trim No. 7 Final Cr/SiO Area, Length/ Nom. Act. Time, Hrs, Temp, R./Sq., Nom R./Sq Mix, at. in. Width R./Sq., R./Sq., Min. 0. ohms I, ma. Power, percent Ratio ohms ohms W./in 2 1 No reading.
Thus the output device of the comparator may be in the form of the solenoid 66 of a relay having a normally open contactor 68 in the shunt circuit 62, =64. The same apparatus may be utilized. to trim resistors of various-design or nominal resistivity, and accordingly the standard or reference voltage supply 56 is preferably adjustable. So also, since resistors may vary not only in ohmic value but in other parameters such as area, it is desirable that the constant current generator 50 be adjustable for enabling selection land/or approximate standardization of the power dissipation rate to be applied to different resistors.
Thus, an apparatus is provided whereby a desired rate of joule heating may be applied to the resistor 22 to be trimmed, and which terminates promptly the application of that power when the potential dfferen-ce across the resistor falls to that across the standard voltage of the monitoring apparatus, in other Words, when the resistance of the device 22 on being trimmed falls to the desired value.
A number of parameters enter into selection of the optimum rate of joule heating to be applied to a particular resistor. The general objective is to raise the temperature of the cermet film of the resistor well above its annealing temperature so as to bring its resistivity to the desired value in a short period of time, both for speeding the operation and to minimize unwanted conduction of heat to adjacent elements. At the same time, it is desired that the application of heat not be so great as to seriously burn the terminals 16, 18 or damage surrounding elements by heat, shock or otherwise. As a general rule, it has been found that a heating rate of about one killowatt per square inch of cermet being treated is usually satisfactory for producing marked and rapid adjustment of the resistivity of most cermets without serious damage. The substrate glass is usually of the heat shock resistant kind,
Since the cut-off of the trimming current is automatic, the duration of the trimming current was not measured. It is ordinarily less than two seconds. In Example #1, however, the high-chromium cermet did not trim into a closer approach to its nominal value of 40 ohms per square with application of three kilowatts per square inch for several minutes, and therefore trimming was discontinued manually to avoid destruction of the resistor. This example is included to show the remarkable heat dissipating capability of these resistors.
An experiment was conducted for the purpose of estimating the time-temperature relation which exists during the trimming of cermet resistors in accordance with the invention. The results were consistant with the conclusion that the mechanism of the trimming step is that of a further, higher temperature annealingwhat one might call joule annealing as opposed to oven annealing as above described with respect to step 38, FIG. 2, or the variant of that oven annealing which occurs when the workpiece is kept hot in the deposition vacuum chamber as in the case of Examples 3, 4 and 7 of Table I.
This experiment is reported in TableII below. All of the sample resistors were on a single substrate and were of 50/50 at. percent Cr-SiO cermet of nominal resistivity of 1000 ohms per square. They were undercoated with 10,000 A. of SiO and overcoated with 10,000 A. of SiO. They had been oven-annealed for a total of 31 /2 hours at about 450 to 475 C. A bit of the indicator was placed on the SiO overcoat, about midway over the cermet element, and trimming current was applied to the resistor until the indicator was observed to melt. The trimming current was calculated to produce joule heating of one kilowatt per square inch at the nominal resistivity; therefore the actual power applied was somewhat above that amount.
TABLE II Act. Resistance,
ohms Molt Sample Nominal Trim. Time to melt Indicator Temp,
Resistance indicator C.
Before After Trim Trim 4, 000 4, 635 4, 213 Al 660 4, 000 4, 722 4, 519 Al 660 4,000 4, 622 4, 611 CdCiTZVgTIQO 568 1,000 1,173 1,159 CdC1 -2%I'I2O .m 568 4, 000 4, 730 4, 727 Pb 327 1, 000 1, 167 1, 167 327 1, 000 1,164 1,130 419 4, 000 4, 681 i 4, 610 419 4, 000 4, 717 4. 713 422 1, 000 1, 059 l. 057 422 Discounting Sample #H as experimental error, it will be seen that the outer surface of the SiO overcoat where the indicator was placed rose to the vicinity of the oven annealing temperature in well under two seconds. In the case of Samples #C and D, a rise to about 100 C. over the oven annealing temperature was indicated in only about a quarter second, perhaps because the cadmium chloride indicator was in the form of fiat crystals making better thermal contact than the aluminum or lead, which were in chip form, or the Zinc or cupro-us chloride which were in powdered form. Of course, the cermct itself would in every case be hotter than the indicator, since the SiO therebetween is an insulator. Thus, it is believed clear that the trimming is brought about by an annealing action in which the ce-rmet is subjected to a temperature higher than its previous annealing experience.
From the foregoing, it will be seen that the invention provides a means of treating cermet resistors in a most flexible manner. Not only can each resistor of a multiplicity on a substrate be treated separately from its neighbors, but also the scope and precision of the treatment is such as to make up for wide variation in the process steps preceding it and to enable relaxation of some of the controls of those steps. Thus, instead of attempting to carry out the oven annealing steps of the prior art to maximum accuracy, it is feasible to stop the oven annealing considerably before the nominal resistivity is reached, leaving all of the final accuracy to the trimming or joule annealing step of the invention.
Table I above was assembled from data which show application of the invention under a wide variety of con ditions. Table III, below, shows more typical results which illustrate the uniformity and reproducibility of the process.
Table III relates to a single panel having 48 resistors of 50/50 atomic percent chromium-silicon monoxide cermct which had been oven annealed at 350390 C. for onehalf hour. The cermet film had a nominal resistivity of about300 ohms per square and the resistors were of 2:1 length-width ratio, or 600 ohm nominal resistance. The variation of the 48 untrimmed resistors was from 616 ohms to 702 ohms, or 86 ohms, while the values for the :same resistors after trimming were found to be 600, +1/ -2 ohms or a total variation of 0.5
TABLE III It is possible where desired to omit the oven annealing as a separate procedure and substitute the relatively crude but sometimes more convenient technique of utilizing so called vacuum annealing, for example as in the cases of Samples #3, 4 and 7 in Table I. It will be recalled that the substrate temperature during the final deposition of silicon monoxide is about 375 C., so that retention of the workpiece in the hot vacuum chamber after the deposition of that layer for thirty minutes or so produces a degree of annealing which can be finished by the further annealing of the trimming step of the invention. As still another option, the entire annealing process can be performed by the joule heating of the invention without any substantial anneal step therebefore, as indicated by line 42, FIG. 2.
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference'to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
What is claimed is:
1. A method of fabricating a cermct thin film resistor to a predetermined design resistivity comprising providing a substrate and forming thereon conductive terminal elements and a chromium-silicon monoxide cermct film in lapped relation to form an electrical circuit path between said elements through said film, said film having a resistivity greater than said design resistivity and being encapsulated completely in silicon monoxide, i y then annealing said film by subjecting the same to a temperature of about 400 C. in an oven until the resistivity of said film approaches said design resistivity, I l and finally heating the cermct film circuit element to a further annealing temperature by passing electrical current through said element until the resistivity of said film reaches said design resistivity. 2. A method of fabricating a cermct thin film resistor to a predetermined design resistivity comprising providing a substrate and forming thereon conductive terminal elements and a chromium-silicon monoxide cermct film in lapped relation to form an electrical circuit path between said elements through said film, said film being in the order of one hundred angstrom units thick and having a resistivity greater than said design resistivity and being encapsulated completely in silicon monoxide, I
then annealing said film by subjecting the same to a temperature of about 400 C. in an oven until the resistivity of said film approaches said design resistivy,
9 10 and finally heating the cermet film element to a Iuragag; gatfi g gggigther annealing temperature, whlle monitoring the re- 2,786,925 3/1957 Kahan 338 308 X SlStaHCB of sand element, by passing electrical cur- 2 994 847 8/1961 Vodar 338 208 rent through said element sufficient to produce joule 5 33055019 10 19 3 Davis 338-308 X heating of about one kilowatt per square inch in said element until the resistivity of said film reaches said design resistivity.
JOHN F. CAMPBELL, Primary Examiner. WHITMORE A. WILTZ, Examiner. W. I. BROOKS, Assistant Examiner.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2786925 *||Dec 31, 1952||Mar 26, 1957||Sprague Electric Co||Metal film resistor|
|US2994847 *||May 31, 1955||Aug 1, 1961||Centre Nat Rech Scient||Film resistors and methods of manufacture|
|US3108019 *||Feb 14, 1958||Oct 22, 1963||Corning Glass Works||Method of stabilizing the electrical resistance of a metal oxide film|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3368919 *||Jul 29, 1964||Feb 13, 1968||Sylvania Electric Prod||Composite protective coat for thin film devices|
|US3411203 *||Jan 14, 1966||Nov 19, 1968||Ibm||Electric field tailoring of thin film resistors|
|US3416959 *||Feb 26, 1965||Dec 17, 1968||Gen Electric||Method of forming carbon resistor films|
|US3434877 *||Jul 16, 1965||Mar 25, 1969||Rca Corp||Metallic connection and the method of making same|
|US3453727 *||Aug 18, 1966||Jul 8, 1969||Ibm||Fabrication of resistors|
|US3457636 *||Nov 12, 1964||Jul 29, 1969||Bunker Ramo||Thin-film resistor adjustment|
|US3457637 *||Feb 6, 1967||Jul 29, 1969||Gen Instrument Corp||Method for trimming cermet resistors|
|US3458687 *||Mar 8, 1967||Jul 29, 1969||Bunker Ramo||Electronic component test fixture|
|US3530573 *||Feb 24, 1967||Sep 29, 1970||Sprague Electric Co||Machined circuit element process|
|US3607386 *||Jun 4, 1968||Sep 21, 1971||Harold M Greenhouse||Method of preparing resistive films|
|US3646305 *||Jul 25, 1969||Feb 29, 1972||Siemens Ag||Process for reducing transition resistance between two superimposed, conducting layers of a microelectric circuit|
|US3713213 *||Nov 26, 1971||Jan 30, 1973||Western Electric Co||Explosive bonding of workpieces|
|US3717837 *||Dec 9, 1970||Feb 20, 1973||Micro Electric Ag||Potentiometer|
|US3720900 *||Jun 25, 1970||Mar 13, 1973||Mettler Instrumente Ag||Thin-film resistance thermometer having low ohmic contact strips|
|US3775725 *||Jan 24, 1972||Nov 27, 1973||Hokuriku Elect Ind||Printed resistor|
|US3786557 *||May 22, 1972||Jan 22, 1974||Bodway G||Fabrication of thin film resistors|
|US3842495 *||Jan 24, 1973||Oct 22, 1974||Gti Corp||Control of rate of change of resistance as a function of temperature in manufacture of resistance elements|
|US3861029 *||Sep 8, 1972||Jan 21, 1975||Raychem Corp||Method of making heater cable|
|US3880657 *||Jul 8, 1974||Apr 29, 1975||Eastman Kodak Co||Conducting layer for organic photoconductive element|
|US3955068 *||Sep 27, 1974||May 4, 1976||Rockwell International Corporation||Flexible conductor-resistor composite|
|US3998980 *||May 30, 1974||Dec 21, 1976||Hewlett-Packard Company||Fabrication of thick film resistors|
|US4210996 *||Apr 26, 1978||Jul 8, 1980||Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Public Corporation||Trimming method for resistance value of polycrystalline silicon resistors especially used as semiconductor integrated circuit resistors|
|US4232213 *||Jan 15, 1979||Nov 4, 1980||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Thermal head|
|US4517444 *||Jan 20, 1984||May 14, 1985||Hitachi, Ltd.||Thermal printhead|
|US4591417 *||Feb 28, 1985||May 27, 1986||Ford Motor Company||Tandem deposition of cermets|
|US4602421 *||Apr 24, 1985||Jul 29, 1986||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force||Low noise polycrystalline semiconductor resistors by hydrogen passivation|
|US4714911 *||May 11, 1987||Dec 22, 1987||Adm Tronics Unlimited, Inc.||Technique for treating manufactured thick film resistors|
|US4732802 *||Sep 26, 1986||Mar 22, 1988||Bourns, Inc.||Cermet resistive element for variable resistor|
|US4782202 *||Dec 29, 1986||Nov 1, 1988||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Method and apparatus for resistance adjustment of thick film thermal print heads|
|US4954695 *||May 12, 1988||Sep 4, 1990||Raychem Corporation||Self-limiting conductive extrudates and methods therefor|
|US5068674 *||Mar 1, 1990||Nov 26, 1991||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Liquid jet recording head stabilization|
|US6025632 *||Dec 11, 1997||Feb 15, 2000||Matsushita Electronics Corp.||Semiconductor integrated circuit with tungston silicide nitride thermal resistor|
|US6329262||Feb 24, 1999||Dec 11, 2001||Takeshi Fukuda||Method for producing semiconductor integrated circuit|
|US6396387 *||Apr 13, 1999||May 28, 2002||Microcoating Technologies, Inc.||Resistors for electronic packaging|
|US7249825 *||May 9, 2003||Jul 31, 2007||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.||Fluid ejection device with data storage structure|
|US20040223034 *||May 9, 2003||Nov 11, 2004||Feinn James A.||Fluid ejection device with data storage structure|
|DE2720410A1 *||May 6, 1977||Nov 24, 1977||Gould Inc||Dehnungsmesstreifen sowie cermet und verfahren fuer dessen herstellung|
|EP0006442A2 *||May 22, 1979||Jan 9, 1980||International Business Machines Corporation||Adjustable thin-film resistor|
|EP0848427A2 *||Dec 12, 1997||Jun 17, 1998||Matsushita Electronics Corporation||Semiconductor integrated citcuit and method for producing the same|
|WO1988002309A1 *||Sep 18, 1987||Apr 7, 1988||Bourns, Inc.||Improved cermet resistive element for variable resistor|
|U.S. Classification||29/620, 427/255.18, 427/250, 338/309, 427/103, 427/331, 338/262, 427/383.5, 29/610.1|
|International Classification||H01C17/26, H01C17/22|
|Cooperative Classification||H01C17/267, H01C17/265|
|European Classification||H01C17/26C, H01C17/26C2|