Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3311305 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateMar 28, 1967
Filing dateMar 10, 1965
Priority dateMar 10, 1965
Publication numberUS 3311305 A, US 3311305A, US-A-3311305, US3311305 A, US3311305A
InventorsCrownover Carl F
Original AssigneeConch Int Methane Ltd
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Two-phase spray system for filling tanks
US 3311305 A
Abstract  available in
Images(1)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

March 28, 1967 c. F. CROWNOVER TWO-PHASE SPRAY SYSTEM FOR FI LLING TANKS Filed Murch 10, 1965 Pressure Confrol INVENTOR Carl F. Crownover ATTORNEY United States Patent 3,31 ,305 TWQ-PHASE SPRAY SYSTEM FOR FlLLlNG TANKS Carl F. Crownover, Ponca (Iity, Okla, assignor to Conch International Methane Limited, Nassau, Bahamas, 2 Bahamian company Fiied Mar. 10, 1965, Ser. No. 438,702 3 Claims. (Cl. 239-200) This invention relates to a system for filling tanks with liquid, and more particularly to a system which is adapted for filling tanks with low-temperature liquids such as liquefied gases.

The increasing use of liquefied gases such as liquefied natural gas, which must be stored at very low temperatures, typically in the order of 260 F., in very large reservoirs, requires that the liquid be introduced into the reservoir for storage in a very particular manner. Since initially, the reservoir walls are at a much higher temperature than the liquid, it is desired to rapidly cool down the walls as the liquid is introduced, which is preferably done by spraying the liquid onto the walls as it is introduced into the reservoir, and thus rapidly cooling the walls down to the temperature of the liquid, so that a stable temperature condition within the reservoir will be attained as quickly as possible, for retention of the maximum amount of the introduced liquid in the liquid form. For this purpose, it is desired that the liquid be sprayed against the walls of the tank in fairly large droplets, generally similar to those issuing from an ordinary bathroom shower. If the spray issues in the form of a fine mist, it will not effectively reach the walls of the reservoir, while if it issues in a solid stream, the maximum amount of effective contact between the liquid and the wall will also not be obtained. It has been proposed to use spray nozzles, which are supplied with gas under pressure, preferably the same gas which is being introduced in liquid form, to a header which feeds the spray nozzles within the tank, while the liquefied gas is also introduced into the same header, so that the gas pressure is effective to produce a fairly vigorous spray as required. The gas pressure can readily be maintained constant, but the amount of liquid which is introduced varies with the conditions, being sometimes at a higher rate than at other times. This introduces a problem, with ordinary spray nozzles, of providing adequate momentum to the spray at low liquid flow rates. A normal spray nozzle operating far below its design capacity will tend to merely produce a dribble of fluid without sufiicient momentum to carry the fluid to the wall as required. This results from the fact that the header pressure will have dropped to some low value dictated by the liquid condition throughout and by the pressure drop across the nozzles at that throughput. The present invention prevents this from occurring by maintaining the header at a constant pressure, thus providing sufiicient momentum to the spray at all liquid throughput rates.

In practice, it has also been found that ordinary spray nozzles used as described above tend to produce a different type of spray, depending upon the rate at which the liquid is being introduced, and varying from the desired droplet, form, to a fine mist, which is not desirable.

It is a major object of the present invention to provide a spray system and special spray nozzles which overcome this disadvantage and which produce substantially the same type of droplet in the spray over a wide range of filling rates.

Another object is to provide a spray nozzle arangement which effectively filters out from the spray nozzle small particles tending to plug the nozzle and interfere with its operation, without interfering with the effectiveness of the spray nozzle.

Patented Mar. 28, 1967 Still another object is to provide an apparatus which permits a steady two-phase liquid-vapor flow through the spray nozzle. A further object is to provide a spray system which is not sensitive to the level of liquid in the header, but produces the same desired type of spray over a wide range of liquid levels.

The specific nature of the invention, as well as other objects and advantages thereof, will clearly appear from a description of a preferred embodiment as shown in the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic view of a cross-section taken taken through an in-ground storage reservoir, showing a filling system according to the invention;

FIG. 2 is a sectional view taken on line 2-2 of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a sectional View taken on line 3-3 of FIG. 2; and

FIG. 4 is a view similar to FIG. 2 showing a modified form of the invention.

In FIG. 1, the invention is shown for use in connection with an in-ground storage reservoir 2, although the invention is also applicable to use with other types of large storage reservoirs. The liquid natural gas in introduced via pipeline 3 controlled by a suitable valve 4, while pressure gas in introduced on line 6 through an automatic pressure control valve 7, which may be of any known type, to maintain the gas pressure at a constant value. The gas in line 6 is preferably the vaporized form of the same gas as is introduced on line3. The mixture of gas and vapor passes down line 8 to header 9 located in the vapor space of the reservoir 2. Header 9 is shown as a single large tube, but may be ring-shaped, or may be a grid of such tubes for the purpose of distributing the spray uniformly throughout the tank, as desired. Protrudin g from the header are a number of tubular members 11 terminating at their lower ends in a suitable spray nozzle 12, which may be a standard commercial spray nozzle of any suitable type. The spray nozzle 12 is attached to the tubular member 11 in any convenient manner, as by a coupling 13. Members 8, 9, 11, 12 and 13 should be made of suitable materials, e.g., stainless steel, which can withstand extremely low temperatures involved, in the order of 258 F. Tubular member 11 is terminated at its upper end in the interior of the header by a cap 14, although in some instances this cap may be omitted and the end of the tubular member left open. The tubular member is provided with at least one slot 16, and preferably with two or more such slots, as best shown in FIG. 3, the slots being sufiiciently long to extend from above the highest liquid level 17 in the header to the lowest liquid level contemplated in normal operation, which can be adjusted by the setting of valve 4, and by the conditions of filling required by external circumstances. Under the expected conditions of use, the LNG flow rate through the reservoir will vary between 5 and 20 gallons per minute, and the number of spray nozzles, together with the suitable design of the slots, should be made such as to accommodate this range of liquid flow, which can readily be done.

It will be seen that under the above conditions of operation, liquid will enter the tubular element 11 through the slots, and gas will be supplied at all times through the top part of the slot (-or through the open end of the tube, if the cap 14 is omitted). The gas pressure is therefore available at all times to force the liquid through the nozzle, and some of the gas, being entrapped in the liquid, will issue together with the liquid, the action being such that the liquid issues as a spray of substantially-sized droplets which are directed preferably against the sides of the reservoir to rapidly cool them during the filling operation. It has been found that this arrangement provides a smooth, constant two-phase spray which does not sputter or cycle, and that it is not particularly sensitive to the level of liquid within the header, provided that this is maintained within the very substantial range permitted by the linear dimensions of the slots. The width of each individual slot should be made smaller than the orifice in the spray nozzle, so that no particles can get into the tubular element which would plug the nozzle. However, a few particles trapped along the length of the nozzle will do very little harm, nor will they interfere substantially with the desired operation of the spray system. Except for this limitation, the sizing of the slot is not critical.

A suitable gas pressure for the above operation has been found to be 25 p.s.i.g.

Since the device is not very sensitive to liquid level Within a wide range, a moderate amount of deviation of the header from strict horizontality can be tolerated, which is an advantage in installing the system. The reservoir 2 can be provided with the customary tube 19 for withdrawing the liquid from the reservoir, and also with a'venting means 21 provided with an automatic pressure control 22, since it is usually desired to maintain the vapor in the vapor space at very slightly above atmospheric pressure, to prevent the possibility of air entering this space and producing an explosive or otherwise dangerous mixture.

FIG. 4 shows a modification of the spray device, in which the slot 16 is replaced by a series of small holes 23 preferably dimensioned to provide the same effective area as the slots, and generally serving the same purpose.

It will be apparent that the embodiments shown are only exemplary and that various modifications can be made in construction and arrangement within the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

I claim:

1. Means for filling a liquefied gas reservoir comprismg (a) a generally horizontal header within the reservoir,

(b) means for supplying pressure gas to the header at constant pressure,

(0) means for supplying fluid to the header at various rates of flow over a limited range,

(d) a tubular element passing through the wall of the header,

(e) a spray nozzle at the end of the tubular element exterior of the header, said nozzle being below the level of liquid in the header,

(f) the portion of the tube within the header extending to above the level of liquid in the header, said portion having restricted fluid passage means through the tubular wall thereof, said passage means extending along the length of the tube from below the liquid level to above the liquid level to provide restricted access of fluid and gas under pressure, from the header to the interior of the tube and thence to the nozzle.

2. The invention according to claim 1, said restricted fluid passage means being a narrow slot.

3. The invention according to claim 1, said restricted passage means being a series of small holes.

References Cited by the Examiner UNITED STATES PATENTS 410,187 9/1889 Partington 239352 X 1,838,093 12/1931 Da Costa 103164 2,544,176 3/1951 Palmer 239550 2,813,402 11/1957 Poethig et al 137109 2,998,934 9/1961 Broughton 239-521 M. HENSON WOOD, JR., Primary Examiner.

V. M. WIGMAN, Assistant Examiner.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US410187 *Jan 18, 1889Sep 3, 1889 Atomizer for dampening fabrics
US1838093 *Feb 18, 1930Dec 29, 1931Da Costa Company IncDispensing faucet
US2544176 *Apr 20, 1949Mar 6, 1951Palmer John ESpray nozzle and attachment
US2813402 *Aug 10, 1955Nov 19, 1957Bastian Blessing CoApparatus for liquid filling of pressure storage tanks
US2998934 *Dec 18, 1959Sep 5, 1961Broughton Arthur ESpraying apparatus
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3339847 *Apr 28, 1965Sep 5, 1967Conch Int Methane LtdTwo-phase spray system for filling tanks
US4925095 *Nov 3, 1986May 15, 1990Liquid Air CorporationMulti-orifice manifold for balancing discharge of liquified gases
US6450682Jan 7, 2000Sep 17, 2002C&M Inc.Method and apparatus for predicting the end of life of a gas scrubber
US6540842Jan 7, 2000Apr 1, 2003C&M Inc.Method for in-situ cleaning of a gas scrubber
US8092755 *Apr 6, 2009Jan 10, 2012Lummus Technology Inc.Devices for injection of gaseous streams into a bed of fluidized solids
US8480965Dec 8, 2011Jul 9, 2013Lummus Technology Inc.Devices for injection of gaseous streams into a bed of fluidized solids
US8877138 *Jul 8, 2013Nov 4, 2014Lummus Technology Inc.Devices for injection of gaseous streams into a bed of fluidized solids
US20120132730 *Nov 30, 2010May 31, 2012Agco CorporationEnhanced Nozzle Body
EP2839874A1 *Apr 6, 2010Feb 25, 2015Lummus Technology Inc.Devices for injection of gaseous streams into a bed of fluidized solids
Classifications
U.S. Classification239/200, 239/547, 261/122.1, 239/550, 239/566, 239/364, 239/373
International ClassificationF17C6/00
Cooperative ClassificationF17C6/00
European ClassificationF17C6/00