|Publication number||US3320556 A|
|Publication date||May 16, 1967|
|Filing date||May 23, 1963|
|Priority date||May 23, 1963|
|Publication number||US 3320556 A, US 3320556A, US-A-3320556, US3320556 A, US3320556A|
|Inventors||Schneider Martin V|
|Original Assignee||Bell Telephone Labor Inc|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (3), Referenced by (35), Classifications (6)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
My 16, 1967 M. v. SCHNEIDER 3,320,556
IMPEDANCE TRANSFORMER Filed May 25, 1963 5 Sheets-Sheet 1 //v VENTOR M 1/ SCHNE/DER A T TO/PNE V y 15, 1967 M. v. SCHNEHDER IMPEDANCE TRANSFORMER 5 Sheets-Sheet 2 Filed May 25, 1963 y 16, 1967 M. v. SCHNEIDER 3,320,556
IMPEDANCE TRANSFORMER Filed May 23, 1965 5 Sheets-Sheet 5 M. v. scHNEaDER 3,320,558-
IMPEDANCE TRANSFORMER May 16, E67
5 Sheets-Sheet Filed May 23, 1963 mwwmomo 2 yawn-sou ZQCUm FGm 5 M G? .50 OHM May 16, 1967 M. v. SCHNEIDER IMPEDANCE TRANSFORMER 5 Sheets-Sheet 5 Filed May 23, 1963 //V|/ENTOR y M. V. SCHNEIDER I ATTORNEY United States Patent Office 3,320,556 Patented May 16, 1967 3,320,556 IMPEDANCE TRANSFORMER Martin V. Schneider, Midd'letown, N.J., assignor to Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated, New York, N.Y., a corporation of New York Filed May 23, 1963, Ser. No. 282,610 7 Claims. (Cl. 333-34) This invention relates to impedance matching transformers and, more particularly, to tapered sections for interconnecting sections of balanced strip transmission line having different ground plane spacings.
Gradually tapered, inhomogeneous transmission lines are often used for interconnecting transmission lines operating at different impedance levels. Since the reflection coefficient of a transmission line taper has a high-pass characteristic, it is well suited for the transmission of wave energy over wide frequency bands. While solutions of the line equations have been found for certain special cases (see, for example, A Transmission Line Taper of Improved Design, by R' W. Klopfenstein, Proceedings of the I.R.E., January 1956, pages 31-35 and The Optimum Tapered Transmission Line Matching Section, by R. E. Collins, Proceedings of the I.R.E., April 1956, pages 539548), the variety of tapers for which this can be done is limited. A further difficulty in the design and construction of impedance transformers arises when the solution obtained is to be translated into a piece of hardware. Typically, a mandrel is built and the transformer electroformed on the mandrel. Obviously, this is an expensive and time consuming procedure which must be repeated if the original design does not perform as anticipated or whenever the circuit conditions have been changed.
It is, accordingly, an object of this invention to simplify the design and construction of impedance transformers for use with balanced strip transmission lines.
A further object of this invention is an adjustable impedance transformer.
When impedance transformers are used in conjunction with active circuit elements, such as tunnel diodes, the phase of the reflection coefilcient, as well as its amplitude, assumes considerable importance. It is, in such cases, highly desirable, from the stability point of view, to have a reflection coefficient for which the phase angle changes gradually with frequency.
Therefore, a further object of this invention is an impedance transformer whose reflection coefficient has a phase angle which varies gradually as a function of frequency.
In accordance with the invention the impedance along a section of balanced strip transmission line is caused to vary as a function of the deflection produced along the outer conductors of the line where the deflection of each conductor is that of a beam under the influence of concentrated loads. In particular, the outer conductors or ground planes of a section of strip transmission line are fastened at both ends to supporting members having different transverse dimensions. Thus, the spacing of the transformer ground planes at each end is fixed and is equal to that of the respective supporting member. In addition, the transformer ground planes are parallel to each other and to the center conductor at both ends.
In the region intermediate the ends, the transformer ground conductors assume a tapered configuration corresponding to that of a beam under the influence of concentrated loads in accordance with the laws of mechanics. It has been found that the taper thus produced has a reflection coefficient which compares favorably with the best prior art tapers. Further improvements in the operating characteristics of the transformer are obtained by modifying the shape of the taper by the application of additional transverse forces along the ground conductors.
It is an advantage of such a transformer that its opcrating characteristics can be continuously varied thus making it a relatively simple matter to adjust precisely the transformer at any particular operating frequency.
These and other objects and advantages, the nature of the present invention, and its various features, will appear more fully upon consideration of the various illustrative embodiments now to be described in detail in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 shows a beam impedance transformer in accordance with the invention;
FIG. 2, given for the purposes of explanation, shows the forces acting upon each of the ground conductors of the transformer illustrated in FIG. 1 and the deflection produced by these forces;
(FIG. 3 shows the variation in the impedance along a beam transformer for different values of transverse load- 'FIG. 4 shows the distribution of reflections along a beam transformer for different values of transverse load- FIG. 5 shows the variation in the reflection coefficient from a beam trans-former as a function of length for different values of transverse loading;
FIGS. 6 and 7 are admittance Smith charts for a beam transformer having a ten to one impedance transformation for two different values of transverse loading; and
FIGS. 8 and 9 show, respectively, a beam impedance transformer for connecting a circular coaxial cable to a strip transmission line of a different impedance, and a beam impedance transformer for connecting two circular coaxial cables of difference impedance.
Referring to FIG. 1, there is shown an impedance transformer 10, of length L, connecting a first strip transmission line 11 to a second strip transmission line 12. Line 1 1 comprises an inner conductor 13 and a pair of parallel, planar, outer conductive members, or ground planes, 1'4 and 1 5 equally spaced a distance b from the inner conductor 13. As indicated in the drawing-s, the total spacing between outer conductors 14 and 15 is 12,. Line 12 similarly comprises an inner conductor '16 and a pair of parallel, planar, outer conductive members 17 and 1 8 equally spaced a distance k from inner conductor 16. The total spacing between outer conductors '17 and 18 is b where b is less than 17 Suitable means, not shown, are provided for maintaining the spaced relationship between the several conductors of lines '11 and 12 in a manner well known in the art.
Because of the unequal spacing between the outer conductors of the two lines, their respective characteristic impedances are different. Means must therefore be provided to interconnect the two lines with an impedance transformer which, preferably, has a low reflection coefficient over the range of operating frequencies. In accordance with the invention, this coupling is achieved by means of the beam transformer 10 which comprises an inner conductor 19 which connects conductor 13 to conductor 16, and the outer, tapered conductive members 20 and 21 which connect outer conductors 14 and 15 to outer conductors 17 and 18, respectively. The inner conductor 19 can be a separate element which connects to the adjacent inner conductors or, alternatively, conductors 13, 19 and 16 can be a single, continuous member.
The taper produced in transformer 10 is the natural deformation assumed by the planar conductors 20 and 211 when they are fastened at both ends to the adjacent outer conductors of lines 11 and 12. More particularly, members 20 and 21 are fastened such that the distances between them at the respective ends of the transformer are equal tothe ground plane spacings of lines 11 and 12. In addition, members 20 and 21 initially extend parallel to each other and to the center conductors 13, 16 and 19 at both ends. That is, the angle between the tangent to the inner surface of members 20 and 21 and the inner conductors at each of the transformer ends is zero.
One simple Way of making the above-described connectio n is to notch the ends of the outer conductors of lines 11 and 12 and of transformer 10, as shown in FIG. 1, and to fasten them together with screws 24.
Located midway along the transformer are the two additional screws 22 and 23 spaced transversely across the transformer, each of which passes through member 20 and threads into member 21. Screws 2-2 and 23 are used to modify the taper of members 20 and 21 for reasons which will be explained hereinbelow.
The configuration assumed by the members 20 and 211, when mounted as described above, can be computed by considering a beam, as shown in FIG. 2, secured at one end and acted upon by a force P and a twisting moment M at the other, free end. In addition, there is a second force Q at the center of the beam produced by the action of screws 22 and 23.
The deflection y at any point x along the beam is given .by the second order differential equation dx EI where M is the total bending moment at any point x along the beam,
E is the modulus of elasticity of the beam, and
I is the moment of inertia of the beam.
Solving Equation 1 for the conditions depicted in FIG. 2
attw -afi and for
Since we require that the derivative dy/dx vanish at As no generality is lost, we put L=1 and EI=1. Doing this and substituting for M the value given by The impedance of a balanced strip transmission line can be calculated from the formula given by S. B. Cohn in his paper Problems in Strip Transmission Lines, pub- 4 lished in the I.R.E. Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, MTT-3, pages 119-126, 1955, as follows:
A I 1 4\ Ci from which it is seen that the impedance is proportional to the ground plane spacing b. Because of this linear relationship, we can more generally express this relationship as a function of the distance x along the taper as If Z and Z are the impedances at the ends of the transformer for ground plane spacing b and b respec tively, we may write, in view of Equation 9, that where If the transformer is tuned by changing the center deflection 6 by means of tuning screws 22 and 23, the forces P and Q change. However, because of the end restraints, the deflection A at the end x=1 remains constant. From Equation 7 we then get that 2P+Q=24A=C (l5) Rewriting Equation 15 as P Q TJ" 6 we obtain the following tabulation which is useful for selecting the optimum taper arrangement:
TABLE I NPNFFt-FFPQQPP u tooeocnn wooome mo r ves-Term t s rowwwu mcnmmqoocoo mmwmwomhoqu woo and is given by The choice of k depends upon the type of transformer needed for a particular application. It will be shown hereinbelow that transformers with k in the range of 0.5 have a reflection coeflicient whose phase characteristic is particularly useful for active circuits requiring a positive susceptance and a nearly constant conductance over an extended frequency range. On the other hand, different values of k are needed for tapers having a minimum length L/x for a specified reflection coeflicient. Such tapers are referred to as optimum tapers. It is a common feature of optimum tapers (i.e., cosine square, Gaussian, and Dolph-Chetycheif tapers) that the impedance Z at the center is the geometric mean of the end impedances. Hence, if we require that Z /Z,Z
for the beam transformer, we obtain A Z Z 5 Z /Z Z (20) from which we derive that 8 Z 9Z Z2 Z2 lo The deflection of the taper for any value of k is obtained by the substitution of P=kC and Q=(12k)C in Equations 5 and 6).
The reflection coeflicient of any beam transformer can be calculated by means of methods described by F. Bolinder (Fourier Transformers in the Theory of Inhomogeneous Transmission Lines, Acta Polytechnica 85, pages 1-83, 1951), S. I. Orlov (Concerning the Theory of Nonuniform Transmission Lines, Soviet Physics 1, pages 2284-2294, 1956), C. B. Sharpe (An Alternative Derivation of Orlovs Synthesis Formula for Nonuniform Lines, Proceedings of the I.E.E., Monograph No. 483E, November 1961) and others. A large variety of such transformers with different ratios of Z to Z have been calculated and measured. For purposes of discussion and illustration, however, one particular taper with a ratio Z /Z 10 will be discussed in detail below.
A beam transformer from 50 ohms to 5 ohms was constructed with the following dimensions:
High Irnpcd- Low Imped- Balanced Strip Transmission Line ance Side ance Side (50 ohms) (5 ohms) Ground plane spacing b b =300 mils. lfl=2G.5 mils. Width of center conductor w. 427 mils 427 mils.
Thickness of center conductor The taper had a length L of 6.70 cm. and the center conductor was supported by a dielectric spacer on the low impedance side.
Table II shows a comparison of the calculated reflection coefficient and the measured reflection coeflicient for k=0.5 (without a centered tuning load).
The results for beam transformers with nonvanishing tuning load (Q 0) also show a high degree of aggreement between the computed and the measured coefiicient of reflection.
The impedance characteristic of a beam transformer for different tuning loads is shown in FIG. 3. The curve k=0.5 is obtained for Q=O as pointed out previously. The function P(x) shown in FIG. 4 represents the distribution of reflection along the line and is included to point out that P(x) is unsymmetrical for k: 0.5, having a maximum close to the low impedance side of the transformer. The case k=0.7 cannot be realized physically but is included for completeness.
FIG. 5 is a plot of the reflection coeflicient for difl erent values of k. As can be seen from these curves, the optimum value of k is O.4. That is, for a given coeflicient of reflection, the shortest transformer is obtained with a loading force, Q, such that k=0.4. It is interesting to note that for k=0.4 a return loss of 20 decibels is obtained with a beam transformer of length L/ \=0.72. A cosine square taper 0f the same length and the same impedance transformation, 011 the other hand, has a return loss of only 14 decibels.
The phase of the reflection coefiicient is plotted on an admittance Smith chart in FIGS. 6 and 7. As indicated hereinabove, the phase characteristic can be very important from the stability standpoint in the design of active circuits. In this regard it ishighly desirable that the phase of the reflection coeflicient change slowly or, when plotted on a Smith chart, spiral slowly. A typical example of this type of behavior is obtained for k=0.5 for the transformer as viewed from the 5 ohm side as shown in FIG. 6. It will be noted, however, that the coeflicient of reflection is quite different, as viewed from the 50 ohm side, in that it spirals more rapidly. This is due to the highly unsymmetrical charcteristic of P(x) for k=0.5 as shown in FIG. 4. P(x), on the other hand, is much more symmetrical for k=0.4, Which gives rise to the more symmetrical curves of FIG. 7.
The beam transformer described above utilizes a centered tuning adjustment. It is understood, however, that additional tunning adjustments, longitudinally distributed along the taper, can be used to more particularly adjust the shape of the transformer.
While the embodiment of FIG. 1 is shown interconnect-ing two strip transmission lines, it is recognized that a beam transformer can also be used to interconnect a circular coaxial cable of a given impedance to either a strip transmission line of a different impedance or to another coaxial cable of a different impedance. The former of these arrangements is illustrated in FIG. 8 which shows a coaxial fitting connected at one end of transformer 81 and a strip transmission line 82 connected at the other end. FIG. 9 shows a first coaxial fitting connected at one end of transformer 92, and a second coaxial fitting 91 connected at the other end. Thus, in all cases it is understood that the above-described arrangements are illustrative of a small number of the many possible specific embodiments which can represent application of the prin ciples of the invention. Numerous and varied other ar- 7 rangements can readily be devised in accordance with these principles by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
What is claimed is: 1. A tapered section of strip transmission line comprising an inner conductor and a pair of transversely spaced, outer conductors, said section having a first spacing between outer conductors at one end and a second different spacing at the other end, characterized in that the shape of said taper between said ends is that of a beam under the influence of concentrated loads.
2. A tapered section of strip transmission line comprising an inner conductor and a pair of transversely spaced outer conductors characterized in that the deflection y of said outer conductors at any point x along their respective lengths is given by the second order differential equation @JL dx EI where M is the total bending moment at a point x along said outer conductors, E is the modulus of elasticity of said outer conductors,
and I is the moment of inertia of said outer conductors. 3. The section according to claim 2 wherein the first derivative dy/dx equals zero at both ends of said section.
4. An impedance transformer comprising an inner conductor and a pair of outer conductors, said transformer having a first transverse spacing between said outer conductors at one end and a second different transverse spacing at the other end, said spacing varying gradually in the region between said ends in accordance with the natural deformation produced in planar conductors under concentrated loads, and means for varying said spacing at at least one point along said region.
5. The transformer according to claim 4 including a first strip transmission line having a first impedance connected to one end of said transformer and a second strip transmission line having a different impedance connected to the other end of said transformer.
6. The transformer according to claim 4 including a firs-t coaxial cable having a first impedance connected to one end of said transformer and a second coaxial cable having a different impedance connected to the other end of said transformer.
7. The transformer according to claim 4 including a coaxial cable having a first impedance connected to one end of said transformer and a strip transmission line having a different impedance connected to the other end of said transformer.
References Cited by the Examiner FOREIGN PATENTS De Vore, Abstract of application Serial No. 475,947, Published Oct. 18, 1949.
ELI LIEBERMAN, Primary Examiner. HERMAN KARL SAALBACH, Assistant Examiner.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2404745 *||Jul 7, 1942||Jul 23, 1946||Rca Corp||Ultra high frequency electron discharge device system|
|US2645769 *||Jun 5, 1947||Jul 14, 1953||Roberts Walter Van B||Continuous wave radar system|
|US2943275 *||Sep 9, 1957||Jun 28, 1960||Bittner Burt J||Transformer for joining unbalanced to balanced transmission means|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3522559 *||Aug 16, 1967||Aug 4, 1970||Bell Telephone Labor Inc||Coaxial blocking capacitor structure with impedance matching adjustment|
|US4371845 *||Jun 15, 1981||Feb 1, 1983||Hughes Aircraft Company||Modular microwave power divider-amplifier-combiner|
|US4730172 *||Sep 30, 1986||Mar 8, 1988||The Boeing Company||Launcher for surface wave transmission lines|
|US5140288 *||Apr 8, 1991||Aug 18, 1992||Motorola, Inc.||Wide band transmission line impedance matching transformer|
|US5844450 *||Mar 5, 1996||Dec 1, 1998||Motorola, Inc.||Integrated microstrip to suspend stripline transition structure and method of fabrication|
|US6507320||Apr 11, 2001||Jan 14, 2003||Raytheon Company||Cross slot antenna|
|US6518844||Apr 13, 2000||Feb 11, 2003||Raytheon Company||Suspended transmission line with embedded amplifier|
|US6535088 *||Apr 13, 2000||Mar 18, 2003||Raytheon Company||Suspended transmission line and method|
|US6542048||Apr 13, 2000||Apr 1, 2003||Raytheon Company||Suspended transmission line with embedded signal channeling device|
|US6552635 *||Apr 13, 2000||Apr 22, 2003||Raytheon Company||Integrated broadside conductor for suspended transmission line and method|
|US6608535||Jul 26, 2002||Aug 19, 2003||Raytheon Company||Suspended transmission line with embedded signal channeling device|
|US6622370||Apr 13, 2000||Sep 23, 2003||Raytheon Company||Method for fabricating suspended transmission line|
|US6885264||Mar 6, 2003||Apr 26, 2005||Raytheon Company||Meandered-line bandpass filter|
|US7986494||May 4, 2007||Jul 26, 2011||Hutchinson Technology Incorporated||Integrated lead head suspension with tapered trace spacing|
|US8169746||May 1, 2012||Hutchinson Technology Incorporated||Integrated lead suspension with multiple trace configurations|
|US8379349||May 2, 2008||Feb 19, 2013||Hutchinson Technology Incorporated||Trace jumpers for disc drive suspensions|
|US8675314||Aug 21, 2013||Mar 18, 2014||Hutchinson Technology Incorporated||Co-located gimbal-based dual stage actuation disk drive suspensions with offset motors|
|US8681456||Sep 13, 2013||Mar 25, 2014||Hutchinson Technology Incorporated||Co-located gimbal-based dual stage actuation disk drive suspensions|
|US8717712||Dec 27, 2013||May 6, 2014||Hutchinson Technology Incorporated||Disk drive suspension assembly having a partially flangeless load point dimple|
|US8792214||Dec 12, 2013||Jul 29, 2014||Hutchinson Technology Incorporated||Electrical contacts to motors in dual stage actuated suspensions|
|US8861141||Jul 31, 2013||Oct 14, 2014||Hutchinson Technology Incorporated||Damped dual stage actuation disk drive suspensions|
|US8891206||Oct 2, 2013||Nov 18, 2014||Hutchinson Technology Incorporated||Co-located gimbal-based dual stage actuation disk drive suspensions with motor stiffener|
|US8896968||Oct 10, 2013||Nov 25, 2014||Hutchinson Technology Incorporated||Co-located gimbal-based dual stage actuation disk drive suspensions with dampers|
|US8896969||Oct 17, 2013||Nov 25, 2014||Hutchinson Technology Incorporated||Two-motor co-located gimbal-based dual stage actuation disk drive suspensions with motor stiffeners|
|US8896970||Dec 31, 2013||Nov 25, 2014||Hutchinson Technology Incorporated||Balanced co-located gimbal-based dual stage actuation disk drive suspensions|
|US8941951||Nov 27, 2013||Jan 27, 2015||Hutchinson Technology Incorporated||Head suspension flexure with integrated strain sensor and sputtered traces|
|US9001469||Mar 14, 2013||Apr 7, 2015||Hutchinson Technology Incorporated||Mid-loadbeam dual stage actuated (DSA) disk drive head suspension|
|US9001471||Mar 17, 2014||Apr 7, 2015||Hutchinson Technology Incorporated||Co-located gimbal-based dual stage actuation disk drive suspensions|
|US9007726||May 5, 2014||Apr 14, 2015||Hutchinson Technology Incorporated||Disk drive suspension assembly having a partially flangeless load point dimple|
|US9147413||Nov 24, 2014||Sep 29, 2015||Hutchinson Technology Incorporated||Balanced co-located gimbal-based dual stage actuation disk drive suspensions|
|US9240203||Aug 25, 2014||Jan 19, 2016||Hutchinson Technology Incorporated||Co-located gimbal-based dual stage actuation disk drive suspensions with dampers|
|US9245555||Nov 3, 2014||Jan 26, 2016||Hutchinson Technology Incorporated||Low resistance ground joints for dual stage actuation disk drive suspensions|
|US9257139||Nov 4, 2014||Feb 9, 2016||Hutchinson Technology Incorporated||Co-located gimbal-based dual stage actuation disk drive suspensions with motor stiffeners|
|US20080273266 *||May 4, 2007||Nov 6, 2008||Hutchinson Technology Incorporated||Integrated lead head suspension with tapered trace spacing|
|EP0113818A2 *||Oct 29, 1983||Jul 25, 1984||Richard Hirschmann GmbH & Co.||Blocking device for surface waves|
|U.S. Classification||333/34, 333/243, 333/238|