Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3333777 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateAug 1, 1967
Filing dateApr 19, 1965
Priority dateApr 19, 1965
Publication numberUS 3333777 A, US 3333777A, US-A-3333777, US3333777 A, US3333777A
InventorsHighfill Jr Clyde W, Self Jr Tom J
Original AssigneeHigfill, Self
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Grinding mill
US 3333777 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

1967 0. W. HIGHFZLL, JR. ETAL. 3,333,777

GRINDING xfiILL 2 Sheets-Sheet 1 Filed April 19, 1965 3 I m w 1H W\V/ HU IHH IUHH 1 7 9 l I 9 & U 9. 9 7 9 a M 414 y K 3 M7 8 9 xx 7 m 5 W2 7. H .m i i w v F. M f i I INVENTORS CL r05 #4 HIGHF/LL, JR. TOM J. SELF; JR.

ATTORNEYS 1967 c. W. HIGHFELL, JR, ETAL 3,333,777

GRINDING MILL 2 Sheets-Sheet Filed April 19, 1965 INVENTORS CLYDE W H/GHF/LL, JR


y I f AT PNEVS United States Patent 3,333,777 GRINDING MILL Clyde W. Highfill, Jr., 5949 Sampson Blvd., Sacramento,

Calif. 95824, and Tom I. Self, Jr., 8782 Stevens Drive,

Orangevale, Calif. 95662, assignors of eighty percent to said Highfill and twenty percent to said Self Filed Apr. 19, 1965, Ser. No. 449,167 6 Claims. (Cl. 241-47) The invention relates to devices for crushing, grinding and otherwise comminuting materials, such as rocks, clay, ore and other minerals.

Both the market place and the patent literature are replete with devices for pulverizing materials obtained from the earth.

In the main, however, devices of this nature which are capable not only of comminuting material to fine particle sizes, but also of sorting or classifying so as to pass only particles smaller than a predetermined size, are complicated and expensive, and require numerous different expensive pieces of apparatus occupying a considerable area of floor space for their operation.

It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a grinding mill which is relatively economical and compact in size, yet which eliminates the need for additional ap paratus, such as screens, filters, re-crushers and lengthy belt conveyors.

It is another object of the invention to provide a grinding mill in which the pulverized product consists of fine particles which are spherical in general configuration, rather than jagged, as are the particles in many prior art devices.

It is a further object of the invention to provide a grinding mill which sorts the output and allows only particles below a predetermined size to pass.

It is another object of the invention to provide a generally improved crusher-grinder.

Other objects, together with the foregoing, are attained in the embodiment described in the following description and shown in the accompanying drawings in which:

FIGURE 1 is a front elevational view, with portions being shown in section, the plane of the section being indicated by the line 11 in FIGURE 2; and

FIGURE 2 is a side elevation, portions being shown in section, the compound plane of the section being indicated by the line 22 in FIGURE 1.

While the crusher-grinder apparatus of the invention is susceptible of numerous physical embodiments, depending upon the environment and requirements of use, substantial numbers of the herein shown and described embodiment have been made and used and all have performed in an eminently satisfactory manner.

The grinding mill of the invention, generally designatedother minerals which vary substantially in size and shape.

For convenience, the raw material will be referred to as rocks, although it is to be clearly understood that the utility of the machine is not confined to rocks alone.

The raw material is conveyed to the mill 12 in any appropriate manner and is deposited in a hopper 13 mounted on suitable framework members 14 adapted to support the various components of the mill.

By gravity, the rocks move downwardly into an airlock 16 comprising a hollow, circular cylindrical housing 17, enclosed at opposite ends by end plates 18. Axially disposed within the housing is a shaft 19 journalled in suitable bearin-gs on the end plates. One end of the shaft extends beyond the bearing and is provided with appropriate fittings, such as sprockets or pulleys, not shown, adapted to be rotated as by a ten horsepower electric motor and at a speed of 25 rpm.

The power equipment and transmission accessories form no part of the invention, as such, are otf-the-shelf items, and are thus not shown in the interests of greater clarity of disclosure of the novel features of the invention.

Mounted radially on the shaft 19 is a plurality of plates 21 extending axially from one end to the other end, radially, to the inner walls of the housing 17. A plurality of welded gusset sectors 20 spaced along the shaft afford great strength and rigidity to the plates. As an air seal, the back sides of the plates 21 are provided with resilient wipers 22 which wipe against the walls as rotation occurs.

On the front sides of each of the plates 21, a plurality of teeth 23 is rigidly secured. Preferably, the teeth are of a hardened variety such as power shovel teeth, and are placed side by side in axial alignment between the opposite ends of the housing. As rotation of the air lock shaft and the plates proceeds in a counterclockwise direction (see FIGURE 1) the points of the teeth dig into the adjacent overlying rocks. This action not only fractures or ruptures a certain number of the rocks, but it also keeps shifting and moving the overlying rock layers, and thus prevents their forming a bridge spanning the bottom of the hopper. Also, as is indicated by the arrow 26, the teeth and the radial plates carry a charge of rocks around through the air lock and discharge them into an inclined chute 27 through which the rocks fall by gravity into a hammer chamber 31.

It is to be noted that at this juncture the rocks have already been subjected to a considerable amount of breaking and cracking, owing to the fracturing effort of the shovel teeth 23, somewhat comparable to the splitting effected by a geologists pick or a stonemasons hammer. The shock imparted by the teeth, furthermore, tends to weaken the rocks along cleavage planes and renders them highly susceptible to additional fracture and comminution in the hammer mill station.

The hammer chamber 31 is substantially of hollow, circular cylindrical configuration and axially is coextensive with the axial dimensions of the air-lock 16 and the chute 27.

In the upper left sector, as appears most clearly in FIG- URE 1, the hammer chamber wall comprises a very thick and strong arcuate plate 33, face-hardened on its concave surface to coact with the revolving, face-hardened hammer heads 34 of the hammer member 36. In other words, the heads 34, which revolve in a counterclockwise direction, in FIGURE 1, not only break the rocks emerging from the chute 27 by impact but the heads 34 also fling rock fragments outwardly by centrifugal force. Some of these fragments strike the heavy arcuate, striker plate 33 e where further comminution occurs. In addition, some of the rocks, particularly those of a size capable of spanning the distance between the arcuate striker plate and the adjacent hammer head, are dragged or scraped along the case-hardened arcuate plate 33 and are thereby subjected to an abrasive action. The radius of curvature of the plate 33 is somewhat sharper adjacent the entrance of the chute 27 with the result that the .gap or space between the concave surface of the plate and the hammer head decreases as the hammer head approaches the chute. In this fashion, any interposed rocks are subjected to a severe, increasing wed-ging or compressive stress, tending further to crush and comminute the rocks.

The hammer member 36 includes an axial shaft 41 suitably journaled in bearings 42 (see FIGURE 2) mounted on brackets 43 secured to the opposite end walls 44 of the hammer chamber 31. A pulley 46 mounted on one end of the shaft is provided with suitable belts 47 leading to a power source, not shown, such as a 50 horsepower electric motor, running at a speed of 250 r.p.m.

The hammer heads 34, previously referred to, are facehardened, elongated plates extending substantially between the opposite end walls 44 of the hammer chamber with a small clearance at each end; and the plates 34 are secured, as by welding, .to the leading edges of a plurality of hammer arms 48. For greater strength, each hammer arm 48 includes a plurality of axially spaced, parallel plates formed to the shape of the arm member designated as 48 and shown in FIGURE 1.

As the revolving hammer head 34 swings into the discharge throat area of the chute 27, the head strikes with great force against the incoming rocks which follow the path indicated by the arrow 51; and, as a result of this impact, extensive fragmentation occurs.

Furthermore, since all materials, even rocks, possess a certain degree of resiliency, deflection of many broken rock particles takes place; and this action, in addition to centrifugal force tends to drive the rock particles downwardly and rearwardly against a plurality of spaced, partially overlapping plates 52, extending axially between the opposite end walls 44.

The overlapping plates 52 are strongly secured in place by a plurality of axially spaced, parallel, arcuate ribs 53, mounted on the frame 14. The inner, or concave edges of the ribs 53 are notched, as appears most clearly in FIGURE 1, to receive the longitudinal, overlapping plates 52. Thus, not only are the overlapping plates themselves strongly made, but they are provided with a very rigid backing; and, as a consequence, the plates 52 further crack such rocks as are impelled against them by the hammers.

The overlapping plates 52 also serve another important purpose. The overlapped portions of adjacent plates are spaced apart a fraction of an inch, and a plurality of axially elongated passageways 56 is thereby provided. In cross-section, as most clearly appears in FIGURE 1, the passageways 56 converge, so that as air moves through the passageways, air velocity increases. The passageways are also so inclined that air flow therethrough, as indicated by the arrows 57 and 58, is approximately tangent to the periphery of the hammer chamber, although not precisely so.

The high velocity air movement originates at a blower (not shown), driven, for example, by a 40 horsepower electric motor. The blower air enters through the intake 61 of a scroll casing 62 encompassing the overlapping plate portion of the hammer chamber.

The plurality of high velocity, substantially tangential air jets, such as are shown by the arrows 57 and 58, dislodge all rock fragments and particles from the plates since the overlapping plates are all inclined to a greater or less extent, with respect to the horizontal, thus causing the fragments to move by gravity into the path of the next lower air jet.

By the time the rock fragments have been subjected to impact against the overlapping plates 52, the particle size is fairly small, or small enough so that the high velocity tangential air streams can pick up and quickly accelerate the particles in an upward direction as indicated by the arrow 65, where they strike a louver 66. A certain portion of the fragments are also impelled against the louver 66 by the counter clockwise movement of the hammer arms.

The louver 66 comprises a plurality of sturdy, spaced, parallel plates 67 axially extending between the end walls 44 (see FIGURE 2). The individual plates 67 of the louver are spaced apart a predetermined distance dependent upon the size of the particle it is intended that the louver shall pass. In the embodiment here shown, the spacing between the plates is of an inch, it having been found that the velocity and quantity of the air entering the hammer chamber from the 40 horsepower blower is suflicient to impart a very high velocity to particles this size, and thus drive these particles against the plates, thence upwardly through the louver openings 68 and into an impact chamber 71, or ricochet chamber.

Fragments larger in size than %-inch are also flung with considerable speed against the lower edges of the louver plates where further fragmentation occurs. Particles incapable of passing through the louver. drop back into the path of the hammer, which causes additional shattering, both on direct impact with the hammers, as well as upon further impact with and abrasion along the concave face of the thickarcuate plate 33.

It will be noted that the louver plates 67 which, in this embodiment, are one inch thick, four inches wide and four feet long, are inclined at an angle of approximately 65 degrees with respect to the horizontal, this also being the angle of inclination of the top plate 69 of the overlapping plates 52. The louver plates 68 thus also serve as vanes, or guides, directing the high velocity air and the smaller entrained particles into parallel streams or paths moving upwardly and to the left (see FIGURE 1) as indicated by the arrows 73 and 74.

At this juncture, it is important to point out that in bringing the violent upward current of air, and entrained particles, into parallel alignment, a spin is imparted to the small particles which pass through the louver. In other words, the particles are moving at a high speed in a generally vertical direction as they strike the louver plates, or more specifically, the lower faces of the louver plates. Since the faces are inclined, the impact of the vertically moving particles results in two components of force; the vertical component resulting in a shattering effect with the horizontal component deflecting the particle laterally and imparting a spin, as the particle bounces off the inclined face. A consequence of this action is that a certain number of the sharp corners on the small rock fragments are abraded away, tending, along with the subsequent steps to be described to produce a finished product which is generally spherical in configuratiom Upon leaving the louver area 66 and passing upwardly and to the left into the ricochet chamber 71 along numerous paths, two of which are indicated by the arrows 73 and 74, the small rapidly moving particles are hurled against a first impact plate 76, or ricochet wall.

The impact plate 76 is disposed at a predetermined angle which, in this embodiment, is approximately 80 degrees. As impact occurs, additional comminution takes place, particularly of the larger particles, as well as a deflection off the wall 76, as indicated by the arrows 78 and 79, the angle of deflection being approximately equal to the angle of incidence, as appears in FIGURE 1. Further abrasion of any sharp corners also arises, from deflection off the wall 76, as well as a spin which is opposite in direction to the spin imparted by the oppositely inclined louver plates 67.

Following the deflection paths 78 and 79, the particles strike against a second impact wall 81. The wall 81 is so inclined (approximately 55 degrees in this embodiment) that in the main, the particles impact normally, or perpendicularly, against the second wall 81. In this configuration, maximum shattering eifort is imparted to the impinging particle and further pulverization is effected. Particles which are spinning at the instant of impact are also further rounded by abrasion of the corners against the face of the second impact wall 81.

Upon reaching this stage, a great majority of the particles are in a finely pulverized and quite rounded condition. These small particles tend to move downwardly and toward the right, as in FIGURE 1, along a path 83 and into a swirl 84, occasioned by a baflle 86, where additional mutual abrasion and corner rounding takes place, the particles being jostled together in the turbulent air flow pattern. 7

In advancing beyond the baffle plate 86, the air current follows the paths approximately as indicated by the arrows, 87, 88 and 89.

Such few fragments as were not reduced to very small size by the time impact with the second wall 81 took place, fall downwardly, since their mass is greater than the small particles following the route 83, and drop into the path of the rapidly upwardly'moving particles in the routes 73 and 74. Interference between the rising material and the falling material results in further mutual comminution and additional abrasion and rounding. Furthermore, the falling fragments are again swept upwardly into impact, as before, with the ricochet walls 76 and the second impact wall 81. Particularly hard particles may be subjected several times to this cycle. Eventually, however, proper reduction in size is achieved and the flow continues, as previously described, into the pattern indicated by the arrows 87, 88 and 89.

This flow pattern is upwardly and in a right-hand direction, as appears in FIGURE 1, through a trunk 91. The trunk is partially defined by a side wall 92 and end walls 90 which converge, as shown in FIGURE 2, into a substantially flat, conically shaped, fan housing 93. l

Disposed within the fan housing 93 is a fan 94 including a plurality of radial blades mounted on a vertical shaft 96 driven by a variable-speed electric motor 97, the motor being mounted on the top of a hollow, circular cylindrical housing 98. Encompassing the upper periphery of the fan 94 is a shroud 99. The clearance between the fan 94 and the shroud 99 is very small, being on the order of 0.006 inch maximum, so as to prevent passage, through the annular clearance space, of any particles larger than 0.006 inch.

Rotation of the fan 94 serves to screen, or classify, the fine particles entrained in the air flow pattern indicated by the arrows 87, 88 and 89. The motor 97 is preferably 3 to 5 horsepower, and includes appropriate controls enabling the speed to be varied between 3600 and 4800 r.p.m. The blades of the fan, in this embodiment, are sixteen in number and measure approximately three inches in height and eighteen inches in diameter. By varying the fan speed, an extremely accurate sizing of the particles which can pass the fan is obtained. By increasing the fan speed, smaller sizes only can pass through the fan, in the manner indicated by the arrow 101, and move upwardly through a discharge conduit 102. A damper 103 interposed in the outflow line 102 provides still further control owing to the back-pressure capabilities afforded by the damper.

Beyond the damper, the air flow and the entrained, very finely comminuted particles, are led to a separator, not shown, of, for example, the conventional cyclone variety.

Particles entering the fan station 94 are subjected to violent buffering by the blades. Those larger particles which are incapable of passing through the fan blades to the discharge conduit, tend to move toward the upper right-hand portion (see FIGURE 1) of the trunk 91, and form a flow pattern indicated by the arrows 106 and 107, terminating in a turbulence indicated by the arrow 108 adjacent the inflow from the right-hand portion of the louver 66. Here, the larger, rejected particles undergo abrasion not only by reason of the swirl 108, but also by virtue of the powerful sand-blast effect of the inflowing air and entrained particles in the stream indicated by the arrow 74.

Abrasion continues and in time the larger particles in the swirl 108 are captured by the blast 74 and are forced to follow the comminution cycle in the riochet chamber 71, as previously described.

As a consequence of the numerous impingements be tween the rock material and the various hard metal surfaces, together with the impact of the rock particles, inter sese, pulverization proceeds to a very fine degree. Operational adjustments are readily effected by the damper 103, and control of particle size is nicely achieved by varying the speed of the classifier fan 94.

In addition, as previously explained in detail, the end product particles are, in the main, very close to being spherical in configuration. This latter result is of especial importance where the comminuted particles are to be wetted, so as to form the raw material for the manufacture of building bricks or fire bricks, for example. Much less chemical wetting agent is required where the particles are rounded than where they are jagged, owing, it is believed, to the fact that the exposed surface area of a sphere is a minimum with respect to the volume. An economy is therefore eflected in that a much smaller amount of chemical additive is needed.

It can therefore be seen that we have provided a compact, yet durable and long lived device which can readily be adusted to provide a wide range of desired particle sizes of generally spherical configuration.

What is claimed is:

1. A grinding mill comprising:

(a) a frame;

('b) a hopper on said frame;

(c) a substantially circular cylindrical hammer chamber mounted on said frame with the axis of said chamber in horizontal attitude, the lower walls of said chamber comprising a plurality of spaced and partially overlapping plates arranged in approximately tangential fashion, the spaced and overlapped portions of said plates forming a passageway for tthe approximately tangential flow of air from outside said chamber into the interior thereof; said hammer chamber further including a louvered portion located adjacent the top of said hammer chamber, and an arcuate crusher plate portion adjacent said louvered portion;

((1) a hammer rotatably mounted on said frame and located within said hammer chamber;

(e) a scroll casing mounted on said frame and encompassing said overlapping plate portion of said hammer chamber;

(f) blower means for delivering air to said scroll casing;

(g) an inflow conduit connecting said hopper and said hammer chamber;

(h) rotatable air lock means interposed in said conduit for the movement of material from said hopper to said hammer chamber without a counterflow movement of air;

(i) an impact chamber mounted on said frame above said hammer chamber, the lowermost portion of said impact chamber being defined by said louvered portion of said hammer chamber, said impact chamber further including a plurality of impact walls disposed at predetermined angles of inclination to receive the impact of material emerging from said louvered portion;

(j) fan means mounted on said impact chamber for withdrawing fine particles therefrom, said fan means including a plurality of rapidly rotating blades encompassed by a shroud spaced therefrom a short distance on the order of the diameter of the maximum desired particle size; and

(k) an exhaust conduit connected to the outflow side of said fan means.

2. The device of claim 1 wherein said hammer includes a plurality of radial arms mounted on a shaft journaled on said frame, the leading surface of each of said arms including an axially mounted, face-hardened plate portion arranged so as to strike the material emerging from said air lock means and said inflow conduit.

3. The device of claim 2 wherein said louvered portion includes a plurality of spaced parallel plates disposed at a predetermined angular attitude relative to said impact walls.

4. The device of claim 3 wherein said fan means includes means for adjusting the spacing of said shroud rela tive to the periphery of said fan blades, and means for selectively changing the rotational velocity of said fan blades.

5. A grinding mill comprising:

(a) a frame;

(b) a hammer chamber on said frame;

(c) means for introducing material into said hammer chamber;

(d) rotatable hammers in said chamber and rotatably mounted on said frame, said hammers being ar- .ranged to strike the material introduced in said chamber;

(e) blower means for delivering air into said chamber through openings in the walls thereof;

(f) a louver mounted on and forming aportion of the wall of said chamber, said louver being eifective to guide a flow of air and entrained material particles in a predetermined direction;

(g) a plurality of impact walls arranged at predetermined angles to receive the impact of materials directed by said louver, said impact walls forming an enclosure adjacent said hammer chamber and communicating therewith through said louver; and

(h) an exhaust line connecting with said enclosure.

8 6. The device of clai-inS further characterized by particle classifying means interposed in said exhaust line for passing particles less than a predetermined size and for rejecting and returning to said enclosure particles larger 5 than said predetermined size.

References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 1 1,699,849 1/1929 Lykken 241--52 X 1,762,381 6/ 1930 Birch 24147 2,546,286 3/1951 Zakel 24152 X 15 WILLIAM W. DYER, JR., Primary Examiner.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1699849 *Nov 3, 1924Jan 22, 1929Lykken Henry GPulverizing device and method
US1762381 *Oct 17, 1927Jun 10, 1930Birch Charles HApparatus for comminuting materials
US2546286 *Jun 28, 1947Mar 27, 1951Paul ZakelRotary beater mill with imperforate concaves, vertical baffled discharge, upper anvil plate, and air and material inlets
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4412659 *Jan 30, 1981Nov 1, 1983Thermoguard Insulation Co.Shredding mill
US4513018 *Aug 3, 1983Apr 23, 1985Rubio Manuel JContinuous production of corn products
US4523990 *Mar 13, 1984Jun 18, 1985Mikropul CorporationParticulate classifying apparatus
US4600156 *Mar 13, 1984Jul 15, 1986Duyckinck Robert WCarbon black mill
US4848677 *Oct 31, 1988Jul 18, 1989Illabo Mining Equipment CompanyComminution/recovery ore mill
US5042724 *Dec 28, 1989Aug 27, 1991Perry Timothy JFluorescent tube crusher with particulate separation and recovery
US5092527 *Dec 28, 1989Mar 3, 1992Mercury Technologies CorporationFluorescent tube crusher with particulate separation and recovery
US5395056 *Jun 15, 1993Mar 7, 1995Perry; Timothy J.Advanced fracture blade and method of operation for fluorescent tube digester
US7581691 *Jun 23, 2004Sep 1, 2009Bridgeview Mfg. Inc.Flail rotor for a bale processor
US9724700Jan 16, 2015Aug 8, 2017Farrbrown Holding LlcRotary collider air mill
US20050017108 *Jun 23, 2004Jan 27, 2005Raymond HelmecziFlail rotor for a bale processor
DE3913694A1 *Apr 26, 1989Nov 16, 1989Illabo Mining Equipment Co PtyPulverisierens- und wiedergewinnenserzmuehle
WO1993001887A1 *Jul 17, 1992Feb 4, 1993Perry Timothy JAdvanced fracture blade and method of operation for fluorescent tube digester
WO2015112318A3 *Jan 17, 2015Nov 12, 2015Farr Reynold PatRotary collider air mill
U.S. Classification241/47, 241/189.1
International ClassificationB02C13/00, B02C13/09
Cooperative ClassificationB02C13/09
European ClassificationB02C13/09