|Publication number||US3342256 A|
|Publication date||Sep 19, 1967|
|Filing date||Apr 17, 1964|
|Priority date||Apr 17, 1964|
|Publication number||US 3342256 A, US 3342256A, US-A-3342256, US3342256 A, US3342256A|
|Inventors||Bernard George G, Holm Le Roy W|
|Original Assignee||Union Oil Co|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (8), Referenced by (44), Classifications (8)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
United States Patent 3,342,256 METHOD FOR RECOVERING OIL FROM SUBTERRANEAN FORMATIONS George G. Bernard and Le Roy W. Holm, Crystal Lake,
10., assignors, by mesne assignments, to Union Oil Company of California, Los Angeles, Calif., a corporation of California No Drawing. Filed Apr. 17, 1964, Ser. No. 360,768
14 Claims. (Cl. 166-9) This invention relates to recovery of petroleum from subterranean reservoirs. It is more specifically concerned with improving the efficiency of a secondary oil recovery process wherein carbon dioxide is used as a solvent.
Secondary recovery of petroleum by the injection of carbon dioxide into an input well and withdrawal of reservoir fluids from at producing well has long been known and practiced. Carbon dioxide has been used alone at high pressures wherein significant oil recoveries have been had. Such a process is described by Whorton et al. in US. Patent 2,623,596. It was later discovered in laboratory core experiments that the recovery of petroleum using carbon dioxide could be greatly increased if the carbon dioxide was used in slug form and driven through the reservoir by an aqueous drive fluid such as brine, plain or carbonated water. A typical process in which carbon dioxide is driven through the reservoir by an aqueous fluid is fully described in Holm, U.S. Patent 3,065,790.
Oil recoveries achieved in applying these methods in which carbon dioxide is used as a solvent in actual reservoirs were disappointing in that the total oil recovery fell far short of that anticipated in the inventions based on core experiments. It was found that while the processes succeeded in recovering practically all of the petroleum in the reservoir which was contacted by the injected carbon dioxide, large quantities of petroleum were still bypassed and left in the reservoir when the process was carried out. This unfortunate 'result has been related to the unfavorable mobility relationship between the reservoir fluids and injected fluids, which results in unsatisfactory areal sweep efficiencies and a corresponding low overall efliciency of the process. It is well known in the oil recovery art that an oil displacement process is most eflicient when the viscosity of the displacing fluid is equal to or greater than the viscosity of the displaced oil. Since carbon dioxide is less viscous and more mobile than most crude oils, it is not a very eflicient oil displacement agent.
It is an object of this invention to provide an improved carbon dioxide-waterfl-ood swpdarggggm y mg by which greater quantfti' sbf oil can be produced. Another object of this invention is to provide a carbon dioxidewaterflood secondary recovery process in which greatly enhanced areal sweep efliciencies are obtained. It is another object of this invention to more effectively utilize the carbon dioxide used in the carbon dioxide-waterflood secondary recovery process.
It has been found that the areal sweep efliciency and the overall efliciency of the carbon dioxide-Waterflood secondary recovery process can be greatly improved by incorporating in the carbon dioxide a small amount of a foaming agent or surfactant. The amount of carbon dioxide needed to obtain high oil recoveries is also decreased, inasmuch as the presence of the surfactant causes the carbon dioxide to be confined to the zone of interest, and prohibits the carbon dioxide from channeling through high permeability strata and thereby becoming lost or unavailable for the purposes for which it was intended to be used. The surfactant or foaming agent can be introduced either in the carbon dioxide slug or directly into the reservoir by means of a water or mineral oil vehicle prior to injection of the carbon dioxide. The surfactant or foaming agent can be either oil soluble or water soluble, and should have suflicient foaming ability and stability to satisfactorily increase the viscosity of the carbon 3,342,256 Patented Sept. 19, 1967 dioxide and to prevent the carbon dioxide from channeling through highly permeable fissures, cracks or strata. The surfactant may be incorporated in a solution containing liquefied and dissolved gases before the carbon dioxide is introduced into the reservoir, so the dissolved gases come out of solution when the injected solution reaches fissures or cracks, and generate foam and effectively plug these highly permeable channels, thereby preventing subsequently injected carbon dioxide from channeling through these cracks away from the reservoir zone to be treated. In other instances, the surfactant solution maybe injected into the reservoir and followed by a small amount of gas which will cause foaming through a considerable portion of the reservoir.
It must be noted that the aforedescribed secondary recovery processes in which carbon dioxide is used as a solvent employ the carbon dioxide at pressures in excess of about 700 p.s.i. It is well known that the solubility characteristics of carbon dioxide have a distinct effect on oil recoveries when the carbon dioxide is at pressures in excess of about 700 p.s.i. At these high pressures, carbon dioxide exists as a dense fluid or liquid, rather than as a gas, even though the critical temperature of carbon dioxide is about 89 F. That is to say, carbon dioxide has not been liquefied at temperatures above 89 F., regardless of the pressures applied. However, below 89 F.,
carbon dioxide exists either as a gas, a dense fluid or a the typical pressures employed in secondary oil recovery when carbon dioxide is used are in excess of 700 p.s.i., and the temperatures are below about 200 F., the carbon dioxide exists as a dense fluid, rather than as a gas, and, in most typical situations where the reservoir temperature is below 89 the carbon dioxide exists as a liquid. A dense fluid is more like a liquid than a gas, as evidenced by considering solubility factors. For instance, a surfactant or foaming agent will readily dissolve in carbon dioxide when the carbon dioxide exists as a dense fluid, whereas the surfactant will not dissolve in the carbon dioxide when the carbon dioxide exists in the gaseous state.
The amount of the carbon dioxide injected into the formation will of course vary for different formations, and will be dependent upon total reservoir pore volume, hydrocarbon pore volume, and other unique formation characteristics. However, throughout this description and claims the term effective pore volume is to be taken to mean that portion of the reservoir which is expected to be contacted by the carbon dioxide injected. Effective pore volume is determined by conventional laboratory and field techniques, well known to petroleum engineers.
In carrying out the process of this invention, about 0.01 to 0.2 effective pore volume of carbon dioxide, containing approximately 0.1 to 10 wt. percent of the foaming agent, is injected through an input well and into the formation. Depending upon the formation temperature and the pressure utilized, the carbon dioxide will exist either as a liquid or as -a dense fluid. The carbon dioxide is preferably injected into the reservoir or formation as a liquid and under suflicient pressure to maintain it in the reservoir as either a dense fluid or a liquid. The subsequently injected drive medium may be water, brine or carbonated water suflicient in quantity to drive the carbon dioxide through the reservoir from the injection to a production well. Injection of the driving fluid is continued until the liquids produced in the production well have a high water/oil ratio, at which time injection of drive fluid is terminated. Subsequent to the termination of driving fluid injection, the formation is depressured to allow the dissolved gases to come out of solution and thereby to form foam or drive addition oil towards the production well.
In another embodiment of this process, the surfactant or foaming agent may be injected into the reservoir or formation prior to injection of the carbon dioxide slug. For instance, the surfactant may be incorporated into a liquid such as water, mineral oil, or those hydrocarbons which are normally liquid at pressures in excess of about 700 p.s.i., such as LPG, propane, etc. In this instance, since the water or hydrocarbon acts as a vehicle for the surfactant, it is necessary that the surfactant be soluble in the vehicle in which it is to be incorporated. Where the surfactant is incorporated in a liquefied light hydrocarbon and is introduced into the reservoir ahead of the carbon dioxide slug, the presence of cracks and fissures, etc., wherein very high pressure gradients exist, will cause the liquefied light hydrocarbon to flash to a gas thereby generating foam at these areas of very high permeability. When the surfactant is incorporated in a water vehicle, the water may contain carbon dioxide or other dissolved gases in amounts sufiicient to cause them to come out of solution and generate foam when an area of low pressure is encountered. When the foaming agent is introduced into the reservoir prior to injection of the carbon dioxide slug, it is readily apparent that the subequently injected carbon dioxide will not channel through highly permeable strata inasmuch as the foam will retard such channeling. Not only does formation of foam at the highly permeable strata, streaks or fissures retard loss of carbon dioxide from the zone of interest, but any foam increases its viscosity, thereby making the carbon dioxide a much more efiicient displacing fluid. While the surfactant-containing solution may have incorporated in it dissolved gas which will come out of solution, it is also possible to inject an aqueous or non-aqueous surfactant-containing solution and follow it with gases such as carbon dioxide, methane, etc. When this mode is utilized, foam will be formed within the immediate vicinity of the injection well and will preferentially be driven into the more highly permeable strata rather than the less permeable strata, the solution taking the path of least resistance. The carbon dioxide then injected will more readily penetrate the less permeable strata because of the plugging effect created by the foam in the highly permeable strata.
The term surfactant or foaming agent :as used in this specification and the appended claims denotes a surfactant or foaming agent which will have a tendency to generate foam in an underground reservoir or formation in the presence of a liquid and a gas. Additionally, the foam generated should have the ability to retard the passage of a fluid therethrough. Non-limiting examples of surfactants or foaming agents useful in this invention are those which when incorporated in a liquid such as liquid hydrocarbon or water in an amount not in excess of 5% by weight, meets the following described test. The surfactant is dissolved in a hydrocarbon or, alternatively, water (depending upon whether or not the surfactant is oilor water-soluble), and 500 ml. of the solution is placed in a graduated cylinder to form a column having a height of 50 cm. Natural gas is passed into the bottom of the column through a fritted glass disc at substantially atmospheric pressure so that the gas bubbles through the column of liquid and passes out of the top of the cylinder. The gas rate is maintained at about 500 ml. of gas per minute per square inch of column cross-sectional area. The flow of gas is continued for a period of 15 minutes, at the end of which time the flow of gas is discontinued. A column of foam will then be found to exist at the top of the column of liquid hydrocarbon or water. The foaming agent or surfactant should desirably, but not necessarily, be capable of producing a column of foam not less than 180 cm. in height under the conditions aforedescribed.
With some surfactants or foaming agents, the aforedescribed test requirements will be met by incorporating quantities of surfactant far less than 5% by weight in the test medium such as hydrocarbon or aqueous solution. Thus, where it is found that 2% y weig t of a given factant is capable of meeting the requirements of the aforedefined test, it is preferred, for reasons of economy, that this amount be used. The use of excessive quantities af surfactant or foaming agents should be avoided for reasons of economy and to prevent the production of an excessively thick and viscous foam bank which might require the use of costly high injection pressures. The use of various commercial high-foaming surfactants or foaming agents is contemplated, an example of a satisfactory oil-soluble foaming agent being a 1:1 mixture of dicoco dimethylammonium chloride and decyl trimethyl ammonium chloride. This mixture can be used in the amount of about 2% by weight with excellent results. An example of a water-soluble surfactant or foaming agent is polyoxyethylated octylphenol, known commercially under the tradename Triton X-lOO. Other examples of suitable foam-producing agents include dimethyl didodecenyl ammonium chloride, methyl trioctenyl ammonium iodide, trimethyl decenyl ammonium chloride, dibutyl dihexadecenyl ammonium chloride, and water-soluble salts of esters of C -C sulfo dicarboxylic acids having the general formula where M is a substituent forming a water-soluble salt, such as alkali metals, ammonium, and substituted ammonium, R is C -C alkyl substituent, and n is an integer from 1-4, e.g., monosodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate, ammonium dilaurylsulfosuccinate, monosodium dibutyl sebacate, monosodium diamyl sulfoadipate, and others; and water-soluble perfiuoroalkanoic acids and salts having 3-24 carbon atoms per molecule, e.g., perfluorooctanoic acid, perfiuoropropanoic acid, perfluorononanoic acid. Other surfactive agents which may be used in the practice of this invention are:
Trade Name Chemical Name Aerosol C-61 Ethanolated alkyl guanidine-amine complex.
Aerosol OS Isopropyl naphthalene sodium sulfonate.
Aerosol OT Dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate.
Arquad 2C Dicoco dimethyl ammonium chloride.
Arquad T Tallow trimethyl ammonium chloride.
Duponol EP Fatty alcohol alkylolamine sulfate.
Duponol RA Modified ether alcohol sulfate sodium salt.
Duponol WAQ Sodium lauryl alcohol sulfate.
Ethomid HT-60 Condensation of hydrogenated tallow amide and ethylene oxide.
Hyonic FA-75 Modified fatty alkylolamide.
Miranol HM Ethylene cyclomido l-lauryl, 2-hy- Concentrate. droxy ethylene Na alcoholate,
methylene Na carboxylate.
Miranol MM Same as Miranol HM except my- Concentrate. ristyl group is substituted for lauryl group.
Nacconal NR Alkyl aryl sulfonate.
Ninol AA62 Laurie diethanolamide.
Ninol 1001 Fatty acid alkanolamide.
Petrowet R Sodium alkyl sulfonate Pluronic L44 Condensation product of ethylene oxide with propylene glycol.
Product BCO C-cetyl betaine.
Renex 650 Polyoxyethylene alkyl aryl ether.
Sorbit AC Sodium alkyl napthalene sulfonate.
Sulfanole FAF Sodium salt of fatty alcohols, sulfated.
Triton AS-30 Sodium lauryl sulfate.
Triton X- Alkyl aryl polyether alcohol.
Trade Name Chemical Name Span 20 Sorbitan M-onolaurate.
Span 40 Sorbitan Monopalmitate.
Span 85 Sorbitan Trioleate.
Tween 65 Polyoxyethylene Sorbitan Tristearate.
Tween 81 Polyoxyethylene Sorbitan Monooleate.
OP-E 1 Octylphenoxyethanols.
OPE 2 Octylphenoxyethanols.
OPE 3 Octylphenoxyethanols.
Triton GR7 Dioctyl Sodium Sulfosuccinate. Triton B-1956 Modified Phthalic Glycerol Alkyl Resin.
Triton X-45 Isooctyl phenyl polyethoxy ethanol (about 5 ethoxy groups per molecule).
As a specific example of one of the embodiments of this invention, a petroleum-containing reservoir having a temperature of 80 F. is subjected to secondary recovery by injecting through an input well 0.05% effective pore volume of carbon dioxide containing 1.0% by weight of Triton X-100. The reservoir pressure is 1000 p.s.i. sufficient to maintain the carbon dioxide in the liquid state. Carbonated water is then injected at a rate of 2000 gallons per day at a pressure of 1200 p.s.i., sufficient to maintain the carbon dioxide in solution and to drive the carbon dioxide slug toward producing wells which surround the injection well. Petroleum is produced in the producing wells until the water/ oil ratio reaches 25. At this point the injection of aqueous driving fluid is terminated and production continued under conditions of pressure depletion.
While in the preferred embodiment the surfactant is incorporated in an amount of about 1% by weight of the liquid carbon dioxide slug, it may also be introduced into the reservoir prior to the injection of the carbon dioxide slug. In such an instance the surfactant solution will preferably contain dissolved gases so that the gases will come out of solution and generate foam in areas of high permeability, thereby decreasing the amount of carbon dioxide needed for effective oil recovery. When the surfactant is incorporated in a liquid hydrocarbon, the amount of liquid hydrocarbon in which the surfactant is placed should be not less than about 0.01 effective pore volume, and ordinarily will be about 0.05 to 0.2 effective pore volume. The amount of surfactant will normally comprise about 0.1 to 10 wt. percent of the vehicle.
From the foregoing description, it is apparent that we have discovered a method whereby carbon dioxide is used in a secondary recovery process more effectively and in lesser amounts. The use of the surfactants not only increases the viscosity of the carbon dioxide slug, thereby making the carbon dioxide a more effective displacing fluid, but also prevents the loss of carbon dioxide from the zone of interest due to faults, fractures and highly permeable strata.
The embodiments of this invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:
1. In the recovery of oil from subterranean oil-bearing formations wherein carbon dioxide is introduced into the formation and then driven through said formation from an injection well to a recovery well by means of an aqueous drive liquid, the improvement which comprises disposing a surfactant solution, capable of forming a stable foam under formation conditions, in said formation not later than the introduction of said carbon dioxide, and prior to the driving of said carbon dioxide by means of said aqueous drive liquid.
2. The method in accordance with claim 1 wherein said solution comprises a surfactant, dissolved gas and a. liquid in which said surfactant is soluble.
3. The method in accordance with claim 2 wherein said gas is selected from the group consisting of ethane, propane and carbon dioxide.
4. The method in accordance with claim 3 wherein said liquid is selected from the group consisting of mineral oil and water. i
5. The method in accordance with claim 4 wherein the quantity of surfactant-containing solution is about 0.01 to 0.20 effective pore volume and said surfactant comprises about 0.1 to 10 wt. percent of said solution.
6. The method in accordance with claim 1 wherein the formation temperature and pressure maintains said carbon dioxide in the non-gaseous state.
7. In the recovery of oil from subterranean oil-bearing formations wherein a slug of non-gaseous carbon dioxide is driven through the reservoir from an injection well to a recovery well by means of an aqueous liquid, the improvement which comprises incorporating a surfactant capable of formin a stable foam under formation conditions in said carbon dioxide 111 an amount atdeast 0.1% by weight of said carbon dioxide.
8. The method of recovering petroleum from an underground oil-bearing formation, having a temperature and pressure suitable to maintain carbon dioxide in nongaseous form and penetrated by at least one injection well and one production well, comprising injecting into said injection well and into said formation 0.01 to 0.20 effective pore volume of carbon dioxide, having inc-orporated therein at least 0.1% by weight of a foaming agent, then injecting an aqueous liquid to drive said injected carbon dioxide toward said producing well, and recovering petroleum therefrom.
9. The method in accordance with claim 8 wherein the aqueous drive liquid is selected from the group consisting of water, brine and carbonated water.
10. The method of recovering petroleum from an underground oil-bearing formation, having a temperature and pressure suitable to maintain carbon dioxide in nongaseous form and penetrated by at least one injection well and one production well, comprising injectipg in to said injection well and into said formation about 0.01 to 0.20 effective pore volume of a surfactant-containing solution, thereafter injectipg fl lll t9 ;0 20 effective pore volume of carbiinfiioiide followed by an aqu egusjiquid whereby said carbon dioxide is driven toward and producing well, and recovering petroleum therefrom.
'11. The method in accordance with claim 10 wherein said surfactant-containing solution comprises dissolved gas, liquid and a surfactant soluble in said liquid.
12. The method in accordance with claim 11 wherein said gas is selected from the group consisting of ethane, propane and carbon dioxide.
13. The method in accordance with claim 12 wherein said liquid is selected from the group consisting of mineral oil and water.
.14. The method in accordance with claim :10 wherein the aqueous drive liquid is selected from the group consisting of water, brine and carbonated water.
References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,875,831 3/1959 Martin et al. 1669 3,065,790 11/1962 Holm 1667 X 3,082,822 3/1963 Holm et al. 1669 3,084,743 4/ 196-3 Vest et al 1669 3,096,821 7/ 1963 Dyes 1669 3,177,939 4/ 1965 Holm et al. 1669 3,196,944 7/1965 Bernard et al. 1669 3,207,217 9/1965 WOertz 1669 ERNEST R. PURSER, Primary Examiner.
CHARLES E. OCONNELL, STEPHEN J. NOVOSAD,
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2875831 *||Apr 16, 1951||Mar 3, 1959||Oil Recovery Corp||Dissemination of wetting agents in subterranean hydrocarbon-bearing formations|
|US3065790 *||Nov 22, 1957||Nov 27, 1962||Pure Oil Co||Oil recovery process|
|US3082822 *||Nov 19, 1959||Mar 26, 1963||Pure Oil Co||Secondary recovery waterflood process|
|US3084743 *||Sep 16, 1958||Apr 9, 1963||Jersey Prod Res Co||Secondary recovery of petroleum|
|US3096821 *||May 31, 1960||Jul 9, 1963||Atlantic Refining Co||Method for increasing recovery of oil|
|US3177939 *||Jan 31, 1963||Apr 13, 1965||Pure Oil Co||Secondary recovery process using gasliquid drive fluids|
|US3196944 *||Dec 11, 1961||Jul 27, 1965||Pure Oil Co||Miscible-displacement process|
|US3207217 *||Aug 12, 1963||Sep 21, 1965||Pure Oil Co||Miscible drive-waterflooding process|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3529668 *||Jul 24, 1968||Sep 22, 1970||Union Oil Co||Foam drive oil recovery process|
|US3800874 *||Jan 22, 1973||Apr 2, 1974||Atlantic Richfield Co||High pressure gas-carbonated water miscible displacement process|
|US3921716 *||Dec 20, 1974||Nov 25, 1975||Texaco Inc||Secondary recovery method|
|US4088190 *||Feb 10, 1977||May 9, 1978||Union Oil Company Of California||Carbon dioxide foam flooding|
|US4113011 *||Mar 7, 1977||Sep 12, 1978||Union Oil Company Of California||Enhanced oil recovery process|
|US4380266 *||Mar 12, 1981||Apr 19, 1983||Shell Oil Company||Reservoir-tailored CO2 -aided oil recovery process|
|US4390068 *||Apr 3, 1981||Jun 28, 1983||Champlin Petroleum Company||Carbon dioxide stimulated oil recovery process|
|US4495995 *||May 19, 1980||Jan 29, 1985||Phillips Petroleum Company||Method for plugging and subsequent treatment of subterranean formations|
|US4502538 *||Jan 9, 1984||Mar 5, 1985||Shell Oil Company||Polyalkoxy sulfonate, CO2 and brine drive process for oil recovery|
|US4624314 *||Jun 3, 1985||Nov 25, 1986||Amerigo Technology Limited||Modified waterflood technique for enhanced hydrocarbon recovery from argillaceous subterranean reservoirs|
|US4694906 *||Aug 30, 1985||Sep 22, 1987||Union Oil Company Of California||Method for emplacement of a gelatinous foam in gas flooding enhanced recovery|
|US4706752 *||Dec 3, 1984||Nov 17, 1987||Union Oil Company Of California||Method for foam emplacement in carbon dioxide enhanced recovery|
|US4763730 *||Aug 5, 1987||Aug 16, 1988||Chevron Research Company||Miscible gas enhanced oil recovery method using oil-brine compatible pre-formed foam|
|US4773484 *||Mar 24, 1987||Sep 27, 1988||Atlantic Richfield Company||Enhanced oil recovery process with reduced gas drive mobility|
|US4799547 *||Jan 29, 1988||Jan 24, 1989||Shell Oil Company||A CO2 drive process for oil recovery employing an alcohol ethoxycarboxylate surfactant|
|US4836281 *||Jan 20, 1988||Jun 6, 1989||Institut Francais Du Petrole||Process for improving the gas sweeping of an oil formation, using foams mainly containing surfactants with perfluoric groups|
|US4856588 *||May 16, 1988||Aug 15, 1989||Shell Oil Company||Selective permeability reduction of oil-free zones of subterranean formations|
|US4856589 *||Aug 30, 1988||Aug 15, 1989||Shell Oil Company||Gas flooding with dilute surfactant solutions|
|US5024276 *||Nov 28, 1989||Jun 18, 1991||Shell Oil Company||Hydraulic fracturing in subterranean formations|
|US5033547 *||Jun 18, 1990||Jul 23, 1991||Texaco Inc.||Method for decreasing mobility of dense carbon dioxide in subterranean formations|
|US5363914 *||Mar 25, 1993||Nov 15, 1994||Exxon Production Research Company||Injection procedure for gas mobility control agents|
|US5392859 *||Dec 2, 1993||Feb 28, 1995||Shell Oil Company||Acid stimulation process for production from subterranean formations|
|US5634520 *||May 8, 1996||Jun 3, 1997||Chevron U.S.A. Inc.||Enhanced oil recovery process including the simultaneous injection of a miscible gas and water|
|US6105672 *||Jun 17, 1998||Aug 22, 2000||Institut Francais Du Petrole||Enhanced petroleum fluid recovery process in an underground reservoir|
|US8684079||Jan 27, 2011||Apr 1, 2014||Exxonmobile Upstream Research Company||Use of a solvent and emulsion for in situ oil recovery|
|US8752623||Jan 10, 2011||Jun 17, 2014||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Solvent separation in a solvent-dominated recovery process|
|US8763710||Jul 21, 2010||Jul 1, 2014||Bergen Teknologioverforing As||Method for integrated enhanced oil recovery from heterogeneous reservoirs|
|US8857527||Aug 19, 2009||Oct 14, 2014||Dow Global Technologies Llc||Compositions for oil recovery and methods of their use|
|US8899321||Apr 11, 2011||Dec 2, 2014||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Method of distributing a viscosity reducing solvent to a set of wells|
|US8973668||Sep 5, 2014||Mar 10, 2015||Dow Global Technologies Llc||Compositions for oil recovery and methods of their use|
|US9033047 *||Nov 24, 2010||May 19, 2015||Chevron U.S.A. Inc.||Enhanced oil recovery in low permeability reservoirs|
|US9267364||May 27, 2011||Feb 23, 2016||Dow Global Technologies Llc||Oil recovery|
|US20110198101 *||Aug 19, 2009||Aug 18, 2011||Sanders Aaron W||Compositions for oil recovery and methods of their use|
|US20110226471 *||Jan 27, 2011||Sep 22, 2011||Robert Chick Wattenbarger||Use of a solvent and emulsion for in situ oil recovery|
|US20120125644 *||Nov 24, 2010||May 24, 2012||Chevron U.S.A. Inc.||Enhanced oil recovery in low permeability reservoirs|
|DE3208662A1 *||Mar 10, 1982||Sep 23, 1982||Shell Int Research||Verfahren zur erdoelfoerderung aus lagerstaetten mit hilfe von kohlendioxid|
|EP0150112A2 *||Jan 18, 1985||Jul 31, 1985||Halliburton Company||Fracturing method for stmulation of wells|
|EP0150112A3 *||Jan 18, 1985||Feb 12, 1986||Halliburton Company||Fracturing method for stmulation of wells|
|EP2278120A1 *||Jul 22, 2009||Jan 26, 2011||Bergen Teknologioverforing AS||Method for integrated enhanced oil recovery from heterogeneous reservoirs|
|EP2346924A1 †||Aug 19, 2009||Jul 27, 2011||Dow Global Technologies LLC||Compositions for oil recovery and methods of their use|
|WO1989012158A1 *||Jun 2, 1989||Dec 14, 1989||Chevron Research Company||Miscible gas enhanced oil recovery method using ethoxylated alkylphenol sulfonate|
|WO2011009610A1 *||Jul 21, 2010||Jan 27, 2011||Bergen Teknologioverføring As||Method for integrated enhanced oil recovery from heterogeneous reservoirs|
|WO2012170835A1 *||Jun 8, 2012||Dec 13, 2012||Dow Global Technologies Llc||Modified nonionic surfactant formulations for enhanced oil recovery|
|WO2013043838A1 *||Sep 20, 2012||Mar 28, 2013||Dow Global Technologies Llc||Use of carbon dioxide soluble nonionic surfactants for enhanced crude oil recovery|
|International Classification||E21B43/16, C09K8/594, C09K8/58|
|Cooperative Classification||E21B43/164, C09K8/594|
|European Classification||C09K8/594, E21B43/16E|