Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3356062 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateDec 5, 1967
Filing dateJun 2, 1965
Priority dateJun 2, 1965
Publication numberUS 3356062 A, US 3356062A, US-A-3356062, US3356062 A, US3356062A
InventorsSullivan Crowe Joseph
Original AssigneeAmerican Can Co
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Gravimetric coating control system
US 3356062 A
Abstract  available in
Images(2)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Dec. 5, 1967 J. s. cRowE GRAVIMETRIC COATING CONTROL SYSTEM 2 Sheets-Sheet 1 Filed June 2, 1965 Arid/FIVE? J. S. CROWE GRAVIMETRIC COATING CONTROL SYSTEM Dec. 5, 1967 2 Sheets-Sheet 2 Filed June .2, 1965 I a; I I? INVENTOR.

0 1% m r 4 W 5 United States Patent M 3,356,062 GRAVIMETRIC COATING CONTROL YSTEM Toseph Sullivan Cr-owe, Wood Ridge, N..l., assignor to American Can Company, New York, N.Y., a corporation of New Jersey Filed June 2, 1965, Ser. No. 460,793 5 Claims. (Cl. 118-7) This application is a continuation in part of application Ser. No. 183,963 filed Mar. 30, 1962, by Joseph Sullivan Crowe for Gravim-etric Coating Control System, now abandoned.

The present invention relates to a method of and apparatus for measuring the amount of coating being applied to a substrate material. More particularly, the invention relates to a gravimetric system for monitoring the weight of coating consumption and thereby controlling the thickness of the coating as it is being applied to the substrate material and while the coating is still in the wet or liquid state.

The industrial uses of coatings of all types are virtually endless. In the packaging industry alone, the use of coatings on various plastic, fibre and metal material for either decorative, protective or adhesion purposes is a growing field. Such coating materials as natural and synthetic resins, paints, varnishes, waxes, sealants, adhesives, and certain metals, such as solder, are customarily applied as film to a substrate material. Common methods of applying these film coatings to the selected substrate material are spraying, immersing, or by passing the substrate material, either as a continuous Web or in sheet form, over an applicator roll which carries the coating in a wet or liquid state.

While the term coating has been used avove as describing a material to be applied to a substrate in a wet or liquid state by spraying, immersion, etc., it is to be understood that, for the purpose of the instant application, the term coating is intended to encompass the formation or extrusion of supported and unsupported plastic films of materials such as polyethylene, which films may be applied or laminated to a substrate in a liquid, semi-liquid or substantially solid state, or may remain as free films.

Whether the coating is applied as a protective film over the entire surface of an article or sheet or merely as narrow strips of solder or adhesive to the marginal edges of a substrate web, it is generally of prime importance that the uniformity of coating deposit be carefully controlled. This is so because, in addition to the necessity of depositing an adequate thickness to ensure good performance, it is equally important to avoid excessive coating thickness in order to keep waste of the normally expensive coating to a minimum.

In the past, time consuming and rather tedious methods have been employed in measuring and controlling coating weight and thickness. A commonly used test requires waiting until the coating has dried to a semi-wet or solid state, after which a test sample would be subjected to destructive testing to determine the coating weight. Such spot-check systems are obviously slow and, accordingly, have motivated the development of more efficient devices whereby periodic inspection could be accomplished as the coating is continuously applied and without marring or destroying the coating by direct contact. There are disclosed in the prior art and are commercially available several such devices, all of which work on one or the 3,35%,db2 Patented Dec. 5, 196? other principles of optics, radiation, electrical charge, thermoelectrics, etc.

Many of the available devices have distinct limitations in that they are applicable only to particular types of coatings or carrier materials. That is, the operational principles inherent in many of these prior art systems are dependent on the nature of either the surface being coated or the coating itself, or both. Optic systems, for example, are applicable with acceptable accuracy only in situations where the light conductivity of the coating and reflective characteristic of the coated surface are determinable parameters. More versatile systems are available, of course, but in the main, they represent rather sophisticated devices which are costly to install and require a certain degree of excellence in operation and maintenance. Many of these devices, although capable of highly accurate and reliable performance in the laboratory, have proven generally unsatisfactory in the practical environment of a production line where the variables of temperature, vibration, spurious light, human judgment, etc., are less easily controlled.

There is still a great need in the industry for a system of coating weight control which is not only insusceptible to adverse shop conditions but which is also simple in construction, installation, operation, and maintenance. Such a system as is conceived would be generally mechanical in nature, and would have particular application to existing coating lines where current equipment discourages installation and maintenance of the complex electrical systems commonly associated with the more sophisticated devices, as well as to small coating operations where production economics rules out costly control equipment.

It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an apparatus for rapidly and efficiently measuring the amount of coating being applied to a substrate material, which apparatus is simple in construction, operation and maintenance.

Another object of the invention is to provide an apparatus of the character described which does not interfere with the speed of operation and is non-destructive of either the coating or substrate material.

Another object of the invention is to provide an apparatus which periodically measures the amount of coating being applied to a selected quantity of substrate material to permit timely determination and control of the coating weight and thickness.

Still another object of this invention is to provide a method of rapidly and elficiently measuring the amount of coating being applied to a substrate material, which method entails simple mechanical principles and which neither interferes with the continuous coating operation nor is destructive of the coating or substrate material.

Numerous other objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent as it is better understood from the following description, which, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, discloses a preferred embodi ment thereof.

These objects are accomplished with a gravimetric system which accurately and directly measures the weight of coating as it is consumed by the coating machine. There is provided, in association with the conventional coating equipment, a scale having a wide range of accurate sensitiveness and a measuring receptacle containing a representative portion of the coating being applied supported on the scale. As the coating is consumed by the machine, the change in weight of the measuring receptacle for a selected time interval, responsive to the weight of coating actually consumed for the interval, is recorded and related to the quantity of substrate material coated during the same interval to establish the consumption rate in terms of pounds of coating consumed per unit, per unit area, or per unit length, as the case may be. The consumption rate is then compared to a standard rate and a correction is effected based on the deviation from the standard for the selected time interval.

Referring to the drawings:

FIGURE 1 is a schematic, side elevational view illustrating one form of coating apparatus and method of the present invention, with portions of the apparatus shown in section;

FIGURE 2 is a perspective view of the metering rollers of the apparatus of FIG. 1, with parts broken away;

FIGURE 3 is a fragmentary view illustrating an alternate embodiment of the gravimetric system used in the present invention;

FIGURE 4 is a schematic wiring diagram representing one form of control system which may be incorporated in the present invention to achieve automatic coating weight correction and regulation;

FIGURE 5 illustrates still another embodiment of the gravimetric system used in the present invention as it is applied to a different form of coating apparatus.

FIG. 1 illustrates in rudimentary detail a preferred or exemplary form of the invention as it may be incorporated in a conventional coating machine, generally designated 10. By way of explanation and not limitation, machine comprises a chain feed conveyor 11 for advancing sheets 12 of a selected substrate material through the nip of a coating applicator roller 13 and back-up roller 14. A selected liquid or wet coating 15, such as resin, wax, varnish, paint or the like, is supplied into the nip of a pair of coating metering rollers 16, 17, one of which engages against and transfers a portion of the coating to the applicator roller 13. As sheets 12 pass through the nip of rollers 13, 14, a thin film 18 of coating from the applicator roller is deposited thereon, after which the sheets pass onto an off-feed chain conveyor 19 for removal from the machine to a suitable place of deposit or subsequent operation, such as drying oven (not shown).

The coating is supplied to the metering rollers from a reservoir 20 through an appropriate conduit 21 by means of a motor driven pump 22, preferably of the constant displacement type. As is customary in machines of the type illustrated, a continuous circulating flow of coating is maintained between the reservoir and metering rollers 16, 17 so that an excess of coating accumulates in the converging well defined by the curved surfaces of the metering rollers. As best illustrated in FIG. 2, this excess or accumulation of coating creates a puddle above the nip of the rollers which spills over each end of the rollers into a sump 23 and then returns to the reservoir through a return conduit 24. Experience with coating machines of this type has proven that, once the machine has operated for a short period of time to achieve equilibrium, the flow circulation of the coating is virtually invariant. Accordingly, for a given time interval, the rate of coating consumption from the reservoir 20 is equal to the rate of coating removal from the circulating fiow by the applicator roller 13, which in turn is equal to rate of deposit on sheets 12. This rate of coating deposit therefore is an absolute function of the size of the nip between the metering rollers 16, 17 and this may be varied at will by a fine adjustment micrometer 25 controlling the relative position of the metering rollers.

In the form of the invention illustrated in FIG. 1, a finely sensitive scale generally designated 26 is mounted on machine 10 on a bracket 27 and at sufiicient elevation so that reservoir 20 may be suspended therefrom on a suitable hook rod 28. In practice, reservoir 20 may be that receptacle in which the coating is received directly from the supplier. These receptacles are customarily of 5 gallon capacity, which for some coating operations represents several hours supply. The selection of scale 26 is arbitrary, of course, but it will be appreciated that since rate of coating consumption in unit weight per unit time is the control parameter, the sensitiveness and calibration characteristics of the type of scale selected should be as good as is economically practicable. Some type of automatic indicating scale is desired, particularly if manual operation is envisaged, and it is preferred that either a spring dial or lever dial scale be used because of the reputation of these types for relatively high sensitiveness and reasonably wide capacity range at relatively low cost. Platform scales, such as illustrated in FIGS. 3 as 26, as well as analytical balances, may also be selected where durability and improved accuracy are desired characteristics offsetting the cost factor. Also, in instances where very heavy, large capacity reservoirs are to be weighed, weighing cells, of the well known electrical resistance or strain gauge type may be utilized.

In operation, the change in weight of reservoir 20 responsive to the rate of coating consumed in machine 10 is indicated directly on the face of scale 26. It is therefore possible to read machine consumption rate directly from the scale at any time, after the circulation flow has stabilized and as long as a supply remains in the reservoir 20, simply by recording the position of the scale indicator at the beginning and end of a selected time interval. This reading in weight units, when related to the number of sheets 12 coated during the reading interval, can then be reduced to coating thickness and compared to a standard to determine if a correction is required.

Although the invention contemplates automatic correction of the metering roller adjustment, as hereinafter will be more described, it is equally well suited for manual operation, particularly in those operations where constant and continuous correction is not essential and production economics does not warrant an elaborate installation. If the latter is preferred, scale 26 may be provided with a maximum reading indicator 29 in addition to the usual needle indicator 30 (see FIG. 1). The maximum reading indicator comprises a graduated sector 29a and an arm 2% for mounting it to the main shaft of the scale. A set needle or lug 290 is formed on one end of the sector for engagement with the needle indicator 30. When it is desired to test the coating consumption, assuming the machine 10 has been operating for a period of time sufficient to establish equilibrium of flow through conduits 21 and 24 to and from the reservoir 20, the operator brings the set" needle 29c against scale needle indicator 30 and tightens a thumb screw 31 to lock the maximum reading indicator in a fixed position on the face of the scale. As the coating is consumed from the reservoir, the needle indicator 30 recedes from the set" needle so that, at the end of a predetermined time interval the operator reads the Weight of coating consumption for the interval directly from sector 29a. This reading is then related to the number of sheets 12 which have passed through the machine for the same time interval, which may be determined either by counting the sheets directly or by knowing in advance the rate of feed. These two factors are then reduced to give coating weight per unit sheet which, when compared to a standard or desired coating weight, indicates the deviation for the interval and amount of correction which is required to be made in the metering rollers.

It will be apparent that the manual technique just described is not an instantaneous determination of coating weight per unit, but rather represents average determination of coating weight taken from a sampling of several sheets. For many coating operations, such an average coating determination taken periodically throughout the course of a day is more than adequate to effectively control the coating quality and avoid excessive waste. For example, a completely manual system was experimentally tested recently in a container making operation using existing conventional coating apparatus, which in this case was a machine incorporating an applicator and metering rollers similar to the arrangement illustrated in FIG. 1. The machine was applying a white alkyd resin decorative coating to sheets of can body C.M.Q. (can making quality) black plate. A test time interval equivalent to the feed of 100 sheets was established, and the weight of coating consumed was determined for this time interval. Throughout some thirty readings made at various times, coating consumption per 100 sheets consistently registered 2.75 lbs., which reduces to an average reading of .0275 lb. per sheet. This was found to correlate exactly with a calculated standard consumption rate for the particular job being run and, accordingly, proved the accuracy of the system of average consumption rate determination for those operations where periodic inspection is desirable or commonly used.

The form of the invention illustrated in FIG. 1 and as hereinbefore described lends itself equally well to automatic determination and correction of coating consumption rate. FIG. 4 illustrates a control system and associated circuits which may be used to effect continuous automatic coating weight regulation and correction. By way of explanation and not limitation, the control system comprises a timer unit generally designated 40 which, when energized by a manual switch 42 through a branch circuit generally designated 41 from a low voltage power source to initiate the control sequence, will detect the sheets 12 passing through machine as they strike and close a trip switch 43. Each time a sheet trips switch 43, the impulse actuates a solenoid-operated pawl 44 which in turn drives a ratchet wheel 45 in the timer. This ratchet wheel has teeth corresponding in number to a predetermined number of sheets which will pass through the machine in a given time interval. That is, for a preselected control interval, which may be a few seconds or minutes or fractions thereof, a ratchet wheel 45 is selected which will be caused to make one complete revolution during the control interval, responsive to a known number of sheets being fed during the same interval. The ratchet wheel is keyed to a shaft 46 which in turn rotates a signal wheel 47 through one revolution during the control interval. Signal wheel 47 is of an insulator material but carries on its periphery a conductor segment 48 which is brought into contact with two contact terminals 49, 49 to complete another branch circuit generally designated 50.

Branch circuit 50 comprises a variable rheostat 51 and a comparator unit 52 in series connection. The comparator 52 is a conventional electronic unit, the detail construction of which forms no part of the instant invention and is therefore not shown. Rheostat 51 is operatively associated with the scale 26 in a well known manner so that movement of needle indicator 36 effects a change in the setting of rheostat 51 and thereby a change in resistance in branch circuit 50. Although a variable rheostat is illustrated, it will be understood that other variable impedance means, such as condensers or balanced tubes, could be used to monitor the change in scale dial position and thus send out control impulses to eifect the same result. As terminals 49, 49 are closed for an instant, corresponding with the beginning of the control interval, current flowing through circuit 50 and rheostat 51 will register in comparator unit 52 an instantaneous effective resistance value R corresponding to the position of needle indicator 30 on scale 26 at that particular instant. Ratchet wheel 45 continues through another revolution to again close terminals 49, 49, thereby terminating one complete control interval, and thereby registering a second resistance value R in the comparator corresponding to the changed position of needle indicator 30 due to coating consumption during the control interval. Thus, the comparator has registered coating consumption for a pre-selected interval in terms of change in circuit resistance.

A third branch circuit generally designated 54 is used to effect correction, if necessary, in succeding intervals of operation. The comparator 52 is provided with a selector dial '53 by which standard or desired coating consumption rates per unit time can be selected. For any selected set ting, the actual consumption rate as registered from rheostat 51 is automatically compared to the standard in the comparator 52 and a correction is made based on the indicated deviation, if any. The correction is accomplished through the circuit generally designated 54 by energizing either of a pair of time delay relays 55, 56, which in turn energize either of a pair of solenoids 57, 58 for a predetermined duration. These solenoids actuate normally retracted pawls S9, tit) which drive ratchet wheels 61, 62 keyed to a shaft 63 to which micrometer 25 is fixed. Depending on the direction of deviation from the standard setting, micrometer 25 is either advanced or retarded by the appropriate ratchet to effect the necessary correction. That is, an indicated overweight in coating consumption is corrected when comparator 52 energizes the appropriate portion of circuit 54 through relay 55 and solenoid 57 to advance ratchet wheel 61 and thereby narrow the nip of metering rollers 16, 17. Conversely, an indicated underweight consumption energizes the other portion of circiut 54 through relay 56 and solenoid 58 to actuate ratchet wheel 62 which retracts micrometer 25 and there by opens the nip of the metering rollers. So long as manual switch 42 remains closed, each successive revolution of signal wheel 47 will send a signal to the comparator 52 and set in motion the comparison and corrective sequence, the eifect thereby being to achieve continuous and instant control of coating consumption rate.

For the purpose of illustration, the comparator unit 52 may incorporate a circuit that is substantially the same as or similar to the bridge circuit 23 disclosed in the U.S. patent to Godley 11 2,545,576; or the comparator circuits disclosed in the U.S. patents to Tyson 2,473,457 and Ayres, 2,676,253. Each of these circuits functions to compare an input to be tested with a standard or predetermined input, and to provide an output if the input deviates from the standard, which output effects a correction in the input to bring it into conformity with the standard.

Up to this point there has been described a form of the invention wherein reservoir 29 is portable and sufiiciently small to be suspended directly from scale 26. There are coating operations, however, requiring larger coating supply reservoirs of a permanent or fixed nature. For example, where the coating must be heated to a molten state before application, such as in certain soldering, wax flushing and hot-melt adhesive coating operations, the reservoir is usually in the form of a large vat or tank rigidly fixed to the floor or a frame member. As will be appreciated, it would be virtually impossible to suspend such reservoirs on a scale device in the manner as hereinbefore described and expect to achieve reliable accuracy.

There is illustrated in FIG. 5 a modification of the present invention which is particularly adapted for coating operations where the fixed supply reservoir obtains. By way of explanation and not limitation, there is shown a reservoir permanently mounted to a frame 71 above a heating unit 72, such as a bank of flame jets. Reservoir 70 may supply any type of coating applicator, but in the form as illustrated, pick up roller 73 withdraws the molten coating from the top of the reservoir and transfers it to a metering or applicator roller 74, as the case may be, for ultimate deposit on a substrate material. In this form of the invention, scale 26 is suspended on a slide 75 which operates in a slideway in the frame. A worm 76 operated by a hand wheel 77 regulates the height of slide 75 for reasons to be hereinafter explained.

Suspended from scale 26 is a measuring receptacle 78 which is in communication with stationary reservoir 70 through a flexible conduit 79. By reason of the flexible communication, a level of coating is maintained in measuring receptacle 78 in exact conformity with the level in reservoir 70, and yet receptacle 78 is free to move vertically independently of the reservoir. Thus, the arrangement as described resembles a cistern-type manometer to the exclusion of a fixed or inflexible communication passage between the two liquid chambers. As the level of coating in reservoir 70 recedes during the course of operation, receptacle 78 may be lowered periodically by worm 76 to ensure that at least a minimum level is maintained in the measuring receptacle at all times.

In this embodiment, scale 26 is provided with a lock mechanism 80 comprising a detent 81 and a double acting solenoid 82. A solenoid actuated valve 83 is provided in the port connecting conduit 79 with reservoir 70 to control the fiow of coating therebetween. A timing mechanism for energizing lock mechanism 80 and valve 83 at appropriate intervals is associated with timer 40 and comprises a reduction gear 84, a valve cam 85, and lock cam 86 all keyed to a shaft 87. Gear 84 meshes with a gear 88 on shaft 46 in the timer 40 (see FIG. 4) so that cams S and 36 are rotated at half the speed of signal wheel 47. Cam 85 is provided with a raised dwell 89 for closing switch 90 which energizes valve 83. Cam 86 is provided with both a raised dwell 91 and recessed dwell 92 for closing a switch 93 for energizing the respective coils of solenoid 82.

The sequence of operation is as follows: When contact 48 first closes terminals 49, 49 to initiate a control interval and register a resistance R in comparator 52, the raised dwell 91 on cam 86 simultaneously closes switch 93 to lock the workings of scale 26. This prevents movement of the scale dial and vertical movement of measuring receptacle 78 during the control interval, during which time valve 83 remains open to permit escape of coating from the receptacle 78 as the level of the coating in reservoir 70 recedes. Then at the termination of the control interval, when contact 48 again closes terminals 49, 49, the dwell 89 on cam 85 closes switch 90 to instantly close valve 83. Simultaneously, recessed dwell 92 on cam 86 closes switch 93 to unlock the scale 26. Valve 83 and terminals 49, 49 remain closed just long enough for the scale needle indicator 30 to move to a new position in response to the weight of coating removed from receptacle 78, thereby registering a resistance R in the comparator 52. The subsequent comparing and corrective sequence is the same as that hereinbefore described, the ratchets 61, 62 being geared to an appropriate micrometer adjustment, such as 25, for controlling roller 74.

It will be understod, of course, that the measured weight of coating withdrawn from receptacle 78 is not a direct measure of the coating consumed from reservoir 70 during the control interval, but instead represents a determinable proportion thereof. That is the change in weight of receptacle 78 for the control interval is to the weight of coating actually consumed as the volume change in the receptacle 78 is to the volume of coating consumed; and, since the change in height in both the receptacle and reservoir is identical, the proportionality is equivalent to the ratio of cross sectional areas of the two enclosures. Since this is a determinable ratio, the selected standard setting read into comparator 52 on selector dial 53 is scaled proportionally to compensate for the indirect measurement.

There has been described a basically simple and yet accurate system for measuring and controlling the weight of a liquid or wet coating as it is being applied directly to a substrate material. Although for exemplary purposes the invention has been described primarily in connection with a type of coating machine wherein individual sheets are coated sequentially, it will be understood that it is equally suited for web coating, immersion coating, spray coating, compound lining, the application of plastic films to a substrate, or any other type of coating operation where coating consumption per unit time is capable of gravimetric determination.

It is thought that the invention and many of its attendant advantages will be understood from the foregoing description, and it will be apparent that various changes may be made in form, construction, and arrangement of parts of the apparatus mentioned herein and in the steps and their order of accomplishment of the method described herein, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention or sacrificing all of its material advantages, the form hereinbefore described being merely a preferred embodiment thereof.

I claim:

1. Apparatus for applying coating material to a plurality of metal sheets comprising an applicator roller, a backup roller, a conveyor for feeding said metal sheets between said rollers, a pair of metering rollers disposed horizontally with respect to one another and one of which engages against said applicator roller, a reservoir to hold a quantity of said coating material, a conduit extending between said reservoir and said metering rollers, a pump to force coating material from said reservoir through said conduit to the nip of said metering rollers, a sump positioned below said metering rolls, a return conduit for directing material falling oft of said metering rollers and into said sump to said reservoir, a scale supporting said reservoir and indicating the weight of said reservoir and coating material therein, whereby the weight of coating material consumed during an interval in which a given number of sheets are coated can be determined to ascertain the amount of coating applied to each of said sheets.

2. The apparatus defined in claim 1 wherein said scale includes a variable impedance so that at any given time the instantaneous effective impedance corresponds to the weight of said reservoir and coating material therein and said apparatus further comprises a comparator in circuit with said variable impedance, means to close said circuit for an instant each time a predetermined number of said metal sheets have been coated to register the change of etiective impedance at said time in said comparator, electrical means in circuit with said comparator to adjust the distance between said metering rolls to thereby regulate the rate of consumption of said coating material, whereby said comparator compares each change in impedance and therefore the corresponding rate of consumption with a predetermined standard and energizes said electrical means to adjust the distance between said metering rolls to equalize said rate of consumption and said predetermined standard.

3. The apparatus defined in claim 2 wherein said variable impedance is a rheostat.

4. The apparatus defined in claim 2 wherein said circuit closing means comprises two open terminals in said circuit adapted to be bridged to close said circuit, a branch circuit which circuit includes a power source, a solenoid operated pawl, and a switch positioned so as to close each time one of said metal sheets passes by it and complete the branch circuit and operate said pawl, a ratchet wheel engaged with said pawl, a signal wheel connected with said ratchet wheel to rotate therewith, a conductor segment mounted on said signal wheel, whereby each time one of said metal sheets engages and closes said switch said pawl rotates said ratchet wheel one notch and when said predetermined number of sheets have passed by said switch said conductor segment bridges said terminals to close said circuit.

5. The apparatus defined in claim 2 wherein said electrical means to adjust the distance between said metering rolls comprises a first ratchet wheel, a first solenoid operated pawl operable to rotate said ratchet wheel to increase said distance, a second ratchet wheel, a second solenoid operated pawl operable to rotate said second ratchet wheel to decrease said distance, a first relay in circuit with and adapted to energize said first solenoid operated pawl and a second relay in circuit with and adapted to energize said second solenoid operated pawl, each of said relays being in circuit with said comparator whereby when said distance between said metering rollers is to be increased said first relay is energized by the comparator and when the distance between the metering r011- ers is to be descreased said second relay is energizd by the comparator.

References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,785,370 12/1930 Thoma-s 118-4 2,002,379

Cote 1181 X Jones 1189 X Johns. Warshaw et a1. 118-9 FOREIGN PATENTS 3/ 1960 Great Britain.

ALFRED L. LEAVITT, Primary Examiner.

5/1935 Thomas 1188 X 0 JOSEPH B. SPENCER, Examiner.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1785370 *Sep 10, 1923Dec 16, 1930Toledo Scale CoFlow-controlling scale
US2002379 *Jan 5, 1928May 21, 1935Toledo Scale Mfg CoControlling device
US2776224 *Feb 10, 1954Jan 1, 1957Us Automatic Box Machinery ComMethod and apparatus for spot coating box blanks
US2981638 *Aug 1, 1957Apr 25, 1961British Cotton Ind Res AssocBack filling of carpets or like operations
US3019336 *Jun 25, 1956Jan 30, 1962American Can CoMethod of and apparatus for measuring coating amounts
US3172779 *Jun 30, 1961Mar 9, 1965 Apparatus for measuring the amount of coating
GB830836A * Title not available
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3465716 *May 13, 1966Sep 9, 1969Barnes Donald AApparatus for treating textile materials
US3607180 *Jun 25, 1968Sep 21, 1971Tektronix IncBonding with a glass frit coating applied by a knurled roller
US3931787 *Jun 20, 1973Jan 13, 1976Stoody CompanyApparatus for applying solid particle material to a strip
US4512947 *May 5, 1983Apr 23, 1985Charles Wyle Engineering CorporationCyclohexanone, high speed production
US4803997 *Jul 14, 1986Feb 14, 1989Edentec CorporationMedical monitor
US4817524 *Dec 31, 1986Apr 4, 1989The Boeing CompanyScreen printing method and apparatus
US5549751 *Apr 14, 1994Aug 27, 1996Windmoeller & HoelscherAdhesive applicator
US8460489Aug 13, 2010Jun 11, 2013Ged Integrated Solutions, Inc.Flexible film application for decorative coatings
US8506709 *Apr 1, 2011Aug 13, 2013Advenira Enterprises, Inc.Roll coater having a recirculation loop for treating excess fluid
US20110244136 *Apr 1, 2011Oct 6, 2011ADCO EngineeringRoll Coater
DE3142701A1 *Oct 28, 1981May 5, 1983Fleissner Maschf Gmbh CoMeasuring device on a fluid application device
DE4137319A1 *Nov 13, 1991May 19, 1993Kronseder Maschf KronesLabelling-machine monitoring with continuous supply of adhesive - computing number of articles for labelling in relation to quantity and temp. of liq.
EP0130814A2 *Jun 29, 1984Jan 9, 1985Acumeter Laboratories Inc.Roll coating applicator for adhesive coatings and the like and process of coating
WO2011014601A1 *Jul 29, 2010Feb 3, 2011Ged Integrated Solutions, Inc.Decorative transfer method and apparatus
Classifications
U.S. Classification118/688, 118/261
International ClassificationB05C1/08, B05C1/02, B05C11/02
Cooperative ClassificationB05C1/0834, B05C11/02, B05C1/025
European ClassificationB05C11/02, B05C1/02D, B05C1/08P2