|Publication number||US3377249 A|
|Publication date||Apr 9, 1968|
|Filing date||Aug 4, 1966|
|Priority date||Aug 4, 1966|
|Also published as||DE1619006A1, DE1619006B2, US3649165|
|Publication number||US 3377249 A, US 3377249A, US-A-3377249, US3377249 A, US3377249A|
|Inventors||Marco Francis W|
|Original Assignee||Deering Milliken Res Corp|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (17), Referenced by (60), Classifications (19)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
United States Patent SOIL RELEASE OF POLYESTER CONTAINING TEX- TILES THROUGH TREATMENT WITH AMINO- PLAST RESINS IN CONJUNCTION WITH ACRYL- IC EMULSION POLYMERS CONTAINING AT LEAST 20% ACID CALCULATED AS ACRYLIC ACID Francis W. Marco, Spartanburg, S.C., assignor to Deering Milliken Research Corporation, Spartanburg, S.C., a corporation of Delaware No Drawing. Filed Aug. 4, 1966, Ser. No. 570,169
Claims. (Cl. 8115.6)
This invention relates to a process for treating a substrate to impart a soil release characteristic thereto, and to products produced thereby. Preferably, the present invention relates to a process for imparting soil release to a textile substrate.
The genesis of synthetically produced textile fibers has brought about a tremendous effort in the textile industry along numerous avenues. There has been much research effort directed to the improvement of these synthetic fibers per se, and improved blends of synthetically produced fibers with natural fibers, i.e., cellulosic fibers or keratinous fibers. Results of this research have been successful and the direction of research has been diverted fromthe synthetic polymer per se and/or blends of said polymers with other naturally occurring fibers. Of recent, fiber research has been directed towards improving physical characteristics of fabric produced from synthetic fibers and/ or blends of these synthetic fibers with naturally occurring fibers, and, more specifically, to the physical characteristics and/ or endurance properties of garments produced from synthetic fabrics and/ or fabric produced from blends of synthetic fibers and naturally occurring fibers. Tremendous effort has ensued towards achievement of a garment containing synthetic and naturally occurring fibers such that creases in the garment are very durable and are not appreciably affected by wear or cleaning processes. In other words, after repeated washings and/ or dry cleaning, the creases remain in the garment in a substantially unaltered condition and further treatment of the garment, i.e., pressing, is not required for maintenance of the crease. Likewise, much eifort has been expended towards the attainment of good wash-'and-wear fabric.
Additionally, further research has been directed to the attainment of a garment having improved soil release properties. Numerous of the synthetically produced fibers that are presently being incorporated in blends with naturally occurring fibers have a propensity to accept and re- .t ain only grime and dirt. Accordingly, when the garment is being worn the soil and/or oily material's accumulate on the garment and settle in the fabric. Once the garment becomes soiled, it is then subjected to a cleaning process for removal of the dirt and/or oily deposits, and only a dry cleaning process will successfully clean the garment. The cleaning process normally employed, however, is washing in a conventional home washing machine by the housewife. During a wash cycle, it is virtually impossible to remove the soil and/or oily stains from the garment and, secondly, assuming that the undesirable materials are removed from the garment or a fairly clean garment is being washed, soil remaining in the wash water is redeposited onto the garment prior to the end of the wash cycle. Hence, when the garment is removed from the washing machine and subsequently dried, it has not been properly cleaned. Such a condition, heretofore unavoidable, is quite disadvantageous in that the garment after being worn never again assumes a truly clean appearance, but instead tends .to gray and/ or yellow due to the soil and/ or oily materials deposited and remaining thereon. Further use and washing of the garment increases the intensity of the graying to the point that ultimately the garment is unacceptable for further Wear due to its discoloration. The process of the present invention solves the soiling problem as hereinafter described.
In attempting to solve the problem of soiling in the synthetic fabrics and blends containing synthetic fabrics, a substantial amount of research has been conducted and numerous patents have issued as a result thereof. None of these patents, however, disclose subject matter as relevant to the problem as is instantly set forth herein. Strong basis of this fact is evidenced by the absence from the market of a product that may be easily cleaned so as to remove soil and alleviate redeposition of soil from the wa'sh water. Anti-soiling research has been directed along two general avenues, one of which utilizes inorganic materials and the second employing the utilization of organic materials. Set forth below is a brief summary of prior efforts.
U.S. Patent 2,999,774 to Schappel features the utilization of silica particles and a salt of a mul't'ivalent metal for the purpose of rendering a fabric soil resistant. U.S. Patent 2,734,835 to Florio et a1. employs at least two hydrous stable metal oxides selected from aluminum, si'l-ica, titanium, beryllium, cerium, cobalt, germanium, manganese, tin, zinc and zirconium. U.S. Patent 3,089,- 778 to Pierce et al. teaches the utilization of a water insoluble basic aluminum salt having an ultimate particle size of less than 0.5 micron. U.S. Patent 2,992,943 to Coover et al. while not purely related to inorganic materials is directed to prevention of dry soiling only. In other words, the Coover et al. treatment dictates the use of a watersoluble compound (an alkyl stitinate and an organic solvent) and therefore to obtain the desired soil resistant properties only a dry cleaning process may be employed.
The organic approach to the soiling problem of synthetic fiber containing fabrics includes the following patents and their teachings. It should be noted, however, that some of the patents incorporated in the following group are not per se directed to reducing the. soiling propensity of the synthetic fiber containing fabric.
U.S. Patent 3,236,685 to Caldwell et al. renders a fabric antistatic and soil-resistant by coating a fabric with a solution or solutions containing a polymeric acid defined as containing COOH, SO H and/ or PO H groups. Additionally, a compound containing a polyol or a compound having incorporated therein epoxide groups is included which under proper conditions reacts with the acid to form an ester. U.S. Patent 3,152,920 also to Caldwell et al. is a complement of the above patent wherein, instead of reacting the polymeric acid with a polyol or an epoxide, the polymeric acid is reacted with the reaction product of a polyol and a polyisocyanate. U.S. Patent 3,125,405 to Gardon is directed to the manufacture of a permanent press garment. N-methylol acrylamide is applied to the fabric with a free radical acid catalyst and the N-methylol acrylamide is cross-linked with the cellulose molecule.
Additionally, extra monomers and polymers are as set forth in the patent which may be incorporated in the treating solution. U.S. Patent 3,246,946 to Gardon likewise is directed to the production of durable press garments. N- methylol acrylamide is employed in conjunction with one or more condensates of an aldehyde and a free radical acid catalyst whereby the reactants are crosslinked with the cellulose molecule. Extra monomers and polymers may be added to the treating solution. U.S. Patent 3,090,- 704 to Collins et al. is directed to a terpolymer for render ing the fabric soil resistant. The terpolymer consists of (1) a compound having incorporated therein a crosslink ing component, (2) a compound having incorporated therein an anionic component, e.g., an alkali metal salt of an aromatic sulfonic acid, and (3) a compound having a component therein that contains a strong nonionizable, nonhydratable permanent or induced dipole. US. Patent 2,876,141 to Matthews employs a solution containing (1) mineral oil, (2) base cordage oil, (3) oleic acid, and (4) a cationic wetting agent, e.g., trimethylp-oleamidoethyl ammonium sulfate in an effort to improve the soil resistance of the fabric treated.
The above brief abstracts are set forth to provide an indication of prior research effort directed to attaining a soil resistant fabric or a fabric having soil release properties. The problem heretofore confronted with fabrics having incorporated therein synthetic fibers has been that the synthetic fibers while hydrophobic are oleophilic and therefore whereas oil and grime may become embedded in the fiber, its hydrophobic properties prevent water from entering the fiber to remove the contaminates therefrom. The efforts of this invention have been directed to the modification of the properties of textile material comprising polyester fibers in such a manner that the soil and oily contaminates may be easily removed.
Additionally, by incorporating the process of the present invention with that of a process to render a garment resistant to creasing, a garment is produced that has both durable press and soil release properties. In other words, the ultimate garment is a utopia for the onsumer and for the housewife who is confronted with the problem of rendering the garment clean for further wearing.
In view of the above comments it should be evident to one skilled in the art that the problem confronted has been that of rendering a garment clean if the garment contains synthetic and/ or natural fibers as described here in. Accordingly, by virtue of the teachings of the present invention, the problems historically present with the use of garments having incorporated therein both cellulosic fibers and synthetically produced fibers are alleviated.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a substrate having soil release properties.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a process for treating a substrate whereby said sub strate easily releases soil when contacted with a detergent solution.
Still further another object of the present invention is to treat a substrate in such a manner that after said substrate is soiled and subjected to washing, less soil and grime from the wash water will be redeposited thereon.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a durable press fabric having soil-release properties.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a process for treating a fabric in such a manner that it has both durable press and soil release properties.
Still another object of the present invention is to treat fabric in such a manner that after a garment produced therefrom is soiled and subjected to washing, soil and grime from the wash water will not be redeposited onto the garment.
Still further another object of the present invention is to provide a treatment for fabric such that garments produced therefrom will not become discolored due to repeated wearing and washing.
Another object of the present invention is to treat fabric in such a manner that a garment produced therefrom has excellent wash-and-wear and soil release properties.
These and other objects may be readily seen from the following detailed description of the present invention.
Generally speaking, the present invention is directed to a process for imparting soil release and durable press characteristics to a textile material comprising linear polyester fibers which comprises applying thereto an aminoplast textile resin, atextile resin catalyst and a synthetic acid emulsion polymer which is stable under the conditions of application, and curing the textile resin. The polymer comprises at least 20 weight percent acid calculated as acrylic acid, and the.proportion of acid polymer solids on the textile material is from about 0.25 to about 5.0 weight percent based on the dry weight of the textile material.
Soil removal ability is improved on any organic substrate comprising linear polyester fibers when the acid polymer is applied thereto. Suitable substrates comprising polyester fibers, which should not be considered as limiting, may be prepared from paper, synthetic polymers, cotton, wool, mixtures of the above, etc. Products made from these materials include without limitation, wall paper; synthetic wall coverings; textile fabric wall coverings; lamp shades; automobile seat covers; automobile upholstery, e.g., door panels, overhead liners, etc.; upholstery for furniture; clothing; apparel accessories, e.g., ties, fabric belts, scarves, hats, etc.; canvas products, e.g., tents, folding cots, etc.; draperies; throw pillows; hassocks; sporting goods; fabric garment bags and luggage; fabric handbags; fabric shoes or shoes made from synthetic materials; linens; book covers; mattress covers; stuffed toys; hammocks; deck chairs, etc.
Textile materials are preferred substrates and those which can be treated according to the process of the invention are those comprising polyester fibers. The term textile material comprising polyester fibers thus comprises polyester fibers with other fibers within the above definition, e.g., cotton, paper, linen, jute, fiax, regenerated cellulose fibers, including viscose rayon, in the form of staple, yarn and fabrics. This invention is directed primarily and preferably to polyester and cellulosic containing textile fabrics either knitted, woven, or nonwoven, preferably woven. However, the advantages of this invention can the achieved by treating the fibers, yarns, or threads employed to produce these fabrics.
Moreover, and more specifically, the process of the present invention is preferably used for treating textile materials containing both polyester and cellulosic and non-cellulosic fibers, especially, if the non-cellulosic fibers have minimum care characteristics of their own. For
example, the fabrics treated may be formed from a mixture of polyester, such as poly(ethylene terephthalate) and polyamide such as poly(hexamethylene adipamide) or acrylic fibers, such as polyacrylonitrile, and copolymers containing at least about 85% combined acrylonitrile filaments or fibers, cotton or rayon. It should be pointed out, however, that textile material containing only non-cellulosic fibers such as those listed above is also within the scope of the present invention.
The soil-release properties of pure cellulosic fiber fabrics are much better than those of synthetic fiber containing fabrics, e.g., polyester fibers, in that, the synthetic polyester fibers are hydrophobic and thus prevent the ingress of water that is necessary for cleaning the fabric and also possess an electrical charge that attracts soil particles. The present invention is therefore most primarily directed to fabrics containing a substantial portion of synthetic polyester fibers.
An aminoplast textile resin will also be applied with the acid polymer. Very unexpectedly, it has been observed that when the textile resin and the acid polymer are both applied to the textile material followed by subjecting the material to textile resin curing conditions, improved soil release is realized.
Hence, the present invention is also directed to a process for treating .a textile material by applying thereto an aminoplast textile resin, a textile resin catalyst and a filmforming synthetic acid emulsion polymer, said polymer containing at least 20 weight percent acid calculated aslacrylic acid and effecting the formation of a film around the fibers that make up the textile material and curing of the textile resin.
The term textile resin according to the present invention includes both monomers and polymers which when applied to a textile material and reacted under proper conditions undergo polymerization and/or condensation and are transformed to the thermoset state. Textile resins that may be employed when practicing the present invention are the aminoplast resins. These nitrogen containing resins when applied to a textile material in the presence of a catalyst at temperatures of from 130 C. to about 200 C. are transformed into the thermoset state. The aminoplast resin condenses with the cellulose molecules and when vinyl groups are present in the aminoplast resin, it undergoes addition polymerization with itself and also with the cellulose molecule if irradiated. The cured textile resin on the textile material affords the textile material a durable press and/or wrinkle resistant characteristic.
Exemplary of the aminoplast resins that may be employed according to the present invention are the urea formaldehydes, e.g., propylene urea formaldehyde, dimethylol urea formaldehyde, etc.; melamine formaldehydes, e.g., tetramethylol melamines, pentamethylol melamines, etc.; ethylene ureas, e.g., dimethylol ethylene urea, dihydroxy dimethylol ethylene urea, ethylene urea formaldehyde, hydroxy ethylene urea formaldehyde, etc., carbamates, e.g., alkyl carbamate formaldehydes, etc.; formaldehyde-acrolein condensation products; formaldehyde-acetone condensation products; alkylol amides, e.g., methylol formamide, methylol acetamide, etc.; acrylamides, e.'g., N-methylol acrylarnide, N-methylol methacrylamide, N- methylol N-methacrylamide, N-methylmethylolacrylamide, N methylol methylene bis(acrylamide), methylene-bis(N-methylol acrylamide), etc.; haloethylene acrylamide; diureas, e.g., trimethylol acetylene diurea, tetramethylol-acetylene diurea, etc.; triazones, e.g., dimethylol-N-ethyl triazone, N-N'-ethylene-bis dimethylol triazone, halotriazones, etc.; haloacetamides, e.g., N-methylol-N-rnethylchloroacetamide, etc.; urons, e.g., dimethylol uron, dihydroxy dimethylol uron, etc., and the like. Mixtures of aminoplast textile resins are also within the scope of the present invention.
Further exemplary of the textile resins within the scope of the present invention are those which conform to the following structural formulae. In each of the following formulae the variables may be selected as follows:
R hydrogen, lower alkyl or residue of saturated or unsaturated aldehyde R hydrogen, lower alkyl or -CX-CR =CHR R hydrogen or methyl R hydrogen or lower alkyl R hydrogen, lower alkyl, or CHR OR at least one R being CHR OR R lower alkyl or hydroxy alkyl R: hydrogen, hydroxyl or lower alkyl R: hydrogen, lower alkyl, alkylol or alkenol X: sulfur or oxygen where a is a whole integer from 1 to 6 The amount of textile resin applied to the fabric is primarily determined by the ultimate use of garments or articles prepared from the fabric. Very small amounts of the resin will afford some improvement and large amounts even greater improvements, but the larger amounts of resin generally adversely affect the hand of the fabric. Hence, the amount of resin employed is preferably that which will afford good crease retention and flat dry properties while not adversely affecting the hand. For the purposes of the present invention, the amount of textile resin in the pad bath may vary between about 2 and 30%. Resin applied to the fabric should be in the range of about 2 to 20% based on the dry weight of the fabric and preferably in the range of about 4 to 9% Catalysts employed within the scope of the present invention depend upon the specific textile resin that is applied to the textile material. For instance, if the textile resin has a functional group that is reactive under acidic conditions, then an acid catalyst is used. Likewise, when a functional group is present that is reactive under alkaline conditions, then a base catalyst is used. Furthermore, both acid and base catalysts may be used when both type functional groups are present in the textile resin. In this instance, the catalysts may be added separately or together. When they are added together, one must be a latent catalyst, i.e., one that will not initiate its reaction during the opposite type reaction, but may be activated subsequently under proper catalytic conditions.
The catalysts useful in activating the acid or base reactive groups are those conventionally used to activate the reaction of textile resins containing the same group for reaction with hydroxy groups of cellulose. Preferably, latent acid or base acting catalysts are utilized,'that is, compounds which are acidic or basic in character under the curing conditions. The most common acid acting catalysts are the metal salts, for example, magnesium chloride, zinc nitrate and zinc fluoroborate and the amino salts, for example, monoethanolamine hydrochloride and 2-arnino-2-methyl-propanol nitrate.
The base acting catalyst preferably is a compound which does not initiate substantial reaction between the base reactive group and hydroxy groups of cellulose under normal acid conditions, but does initiate substantial reaction under prescribed conditions, such as elevated temperature or some other activating means, as through use of another chemical compound. For example, an alkali metal sulfite can be padded onto the fabric and be decomposed into strongly basic alkali metal hydroxide by including small amounts of formaldehyde in the steam used for curing.
The latent base acting catalyst utilized herein preferably comprises alkali-metal salts, such as alkali-metal carbonates like sodium carbonate, which is neutral to mildly alkaline, for example, pH of about 8.5 on the fabric but decomposes at temperatures in excess of about 80 C. to form the stronger base sodium oxide which will initiate substantial reaction at the elevated temperatures utilized during curing. Sodium carbonate may be utilized if desired since the pH in the fabric produced by this compound in normal conditions is generally insufficient to initiate the desired degree of reaction under normal temperature conditions.
If fabrics containing a base reactive group are maintained at pH levels above about 10, however, degradation occurs, so that essentially neutral or mildly alkaline cata lysts are preferred when base reactive compounds are utilized.
Additional base acting catalysts include potassium bicarbonate, potassium carbonate, sodium silicate, alkali metal phosphates, such as sodium or potassium phosphates, barium carbonate, quaternary ammonium hydroxides and carbonates, for example, lauryl trimethyl ammonium hydroxides and carbonates and the like.
The amount of catalyst to be utilized is that conventionally used in activating the reaction between textile resins and hydroxy groups of cellulose, for example, up to about 15% by weight of an acid acting catalyst in the application bath with the preferred range being from about 1% to about 7%. A preferred range for the base. acting catalyst is again the conventional amount and is generally between about 0.2% to about 16%, preferably about 2 to 16%. The amount of catalyst to be utilized will further depend in part on the temperature at which the reaction is conducted and the amount of catalyst consumed in the reaction. For example, when base catalysts are utilized and if a highly acidic group is released during the reaction, the amount of base applied to the textile material should be at least sufficient to provide an excess of base in addition to that which is consumed by the highly acidic group.
The term soil release in accordance with the present invention refers to the ability of the fabric to be washed or otherwise treated to remove soil and/r oily materials that have come into contact with said material. The present invention does not per se prevent the attachment of soil or oily materials to the fabric, but hinders such attachment and renders the heretofore uncleanable fabric now susceptible to a successful cleaning operation. While the theory is still somewhat of a mystery, soiled, treated fabric when immersed in the detergent containing wash water experiences an agglomeration of the oil at the fabric surface. This water is basic in nature and it has been determined that soil release is best realized in wash water that is basic in nature. These globules of oil are then removed from the fabric and rise to the surface of the wash water. This phenomenon takes place in the home washer during continued agitation, but the same effect has been observed even under static conditions. In other words, a strip of polyester/cotton fabric treated according to the process of the present invention and soiled with crude oil, when simply immersed in .a detergent solution will lose the oil without agitation. The oil just balls up on the fabric, dislodges therefrom, and rises to the surface of the solution.
An added feature of the present invention is the prevention of soil redeposition from the wash water. One of the greatest disadvantages of the synthetic polymers is the feature that even after removing the soil by washing, there is the continued danger that the soil will be redeposited onto the fibers from the wash water before the garment is removed therefrom. It has been observed that the soil release ability of the presently treated fabric diminishes after repeated washings. Even after the ability to remove soil from the fabric has diminished, however, the observation has been made that the prevention of redeposition of soil from wash water remains potent. This phenomenon likewise is unexplainable, but it has been established that the troublesome soil is negatively charged and presumably there remains enough acid on the fabric to repel the negatively charged soil.
Numerous of the substrates that may be treated according to the process of the present invention may not be feasibly removed from their environment and washed in a washing machine. Further, there are also substrates that may be treated which when subjected to the action of a washing machine are adversely affected either in structure or in looks. Articles within these classes may still be easily cleaned in place or otherwise by scrubbing the soiled area lightly with a solution of a commercial detergent and water.
The soil release polymer of the present invention will also be hereinafter referred to as an acid emulsion polymer. This acid emulsion polymer may be selected from a large number of synthetically produced compounds provided certain limitations are met. The acid polymer employed advantageously is capable of forming a film around the fibers that constitute the textile material. Softness of the film is important, for if the film is too hard, the hand of the textile material is adversely affected. Further the film must have hydrophilic properties and be at least partially insoluble in Water. The film, if water soluble, would, of course, be easily washed from the fabric. Acid content of the film is likewise important and at least 10 weight percent of the acid polymer from which the film is formed must be acid calculated as acrylic acid and preferably at least 20 weight percent. The results obtained from using acid polymers containing 10 weight percent acid give improved results as may be seen from Table III. For commercial acceptance, however, these should preferably be at least 20 weight percent acid in the soil release polymer calculated as acrylic acid. Again reference is made to Table III. It has further been observed that all of the acid polymers that afford soil release have acarbon atom to acid group ratio in the repeat group in the range of 2:1 to 30:1, and that an air dried film cast therefrom has a water of imbibition of at least 89%.
synthetically produced acid emulsion polymers within the scope of the present invention may be prepared from any of the polymerizable organic acids, i.e., those having reactive points of unsaturation. These polymers may be interpolymers of the acid and other monomers copolymerizable therewith so long as at least 20 weight percent acid monomer is present in the polymer. Exemplary of polymerizable acids that may be used, are acrylic acid, maleic acid, fumaric acid, methacrylic acid, itaconic acid, crotonic acid, cinnamic acid, polymerizable sulfonic acids, polymerizable phosphoric acids, etc. Monomers that may be interpolymerized with the acids include any monomers capable of copolymerizing with the acids and which will not detrimentally affect the film-forming properties of the polymer. Suitable monomers include, esters of the above acids prepared by reacting the particular acid with an alkyl alcohol, e.g., ethyl acrylate, methyl acrylate, propyl acrylate, isopropyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, ethyl methacrylate, 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, etc.; alkyl fumarates, maleates, crotonates, cinamates, etc.; vinyl halides; monomers having vinylidene groups; e.g., styrene, acrylonitrile, methylstyrene; substituted vinyl monomers, e.g., chlorostyrene;. butadiene, etc. In all of the polymers prepared from the above listed monomers, there must be at least 20 weight percent acid calculated as acrylic acid. It should be noted that various mixtures of the above polymers will work according to the process of the present invention and hence should be considered within the scope of the present invention. Furthermore, salts of the acid polymers, e.g., sodium, potassium, lith ium, ammonium, etc., will afford the desired soil release characteristics.
9 Examples of some of the synthetic acid polymers that may be used according to the present invention are polymerization products of:
Some acid polymers work better than others, however, and these are preferred. Examples of the preferred acid emulsion polymers include (1) copolymers of ethyl acrylate and acrylic acid that are prepared by polymerizing a comonomer mixture of from about 50 to 80 parts of ethyl acrylate and about 20 to 50 parts of acrylic acid; (2) copolymers of propyl or isopropyl acrylate and acrylic acid wherein the copolymers are prepared by polymerizing a monomer mixture of from about 40 to 57 parts propyl or isopropyl acrylate and about 43 to 60 parts of acrylic acid; (3) copolymers of butyl acrylate and acrylic acid prepared by polymerizing a co-monomer mixture of from about 30 to 70 parts of butyl acrylate and about 70 to 30 parts of acrylic acid; (4) copolymers of 2-ethylhexylacrylate and acrylic acid prepared by polymerizing a co-monomer mixture of from about 10 to 40 parts of 2-ethyl hexyl acrylate and about 60 to 90 parts of acrylic acid; (5) copolymers substantially identical to the ones listed above with the exception that methacrylic acid is substituted for acrylic acid and the esters are methacrylates instead of acrylates; (6) a copolymer of ethyl acrylate and itaconic acid prepared by polymerizing a monomer mixture comprising about 70 parts ethyl acrylate and about 30 parts itaconic acid; (7) copolymers of the acrylic acid set forth above wherein the acrylates are substituted by methacrylates; and (8) terpolymers comprising ethylacrylate, acrylic acid and acrylamide prepared from monomer mixtures of ethyl acrylate, at least 10 parts acrylic acid and up to parts acrylamide.
The acid polymers suitable for use in practicing the present invention form a hydrophilic film upon drying and afford soil release ability at that point. For unknown reasons, further treatments and/or ingredients will enhance the soil release ability of the substrate. If the substrate having the acid polymer thereon is subjected to to textile resin curing conditions, the durability of the soil release ability is enhanced. Likewise, the presence of a textile resin catalyst during the textile resin curing conditions further improves soil release ability. Still further, the soil release finish is much more lasting on a substrate when the acid polymer is subjected to textile resin curing conditions in the presence of an aminoplast textile resin. It is known that the film covers the hydrophobic synthetic fiber contents of the textile material without any reaction therewith. What is not understood, however, is the durability of the soil release characteristic. While it is known that there is some reaction between the acid polymer and the textile resin, the reaction mechanism is very speculative. Furthermore, there may be some crosslinking between the cellulose molecules and the acid polymer or there may be just an enhanced physical bond between the textile resin and the acid polymer above and beyond their reactivity.
Soil release polymers, like the textile resins, give some improvement at very low levels on the fabric. Accordingly, as the amount of soil release polymer is increased, the ability of the fabric to release soil increases. Thus, the upper limit on the amount of soil release polymer is determined by economics and resulting adverse effects on the fabric, e.g., the hand of the fabric. Furthermore, practically speaking there is a set range of soil release polymer dictated by commercial success.
The acid polymers, are emulsion polymers containing varying amounts of solids, normally in the range of about r to 50 weight percent. The polymer emulsion should be present in the pad bath or other application medium in the range of about 2.5 to 40 weight percent. Otherwise stated, there should be from about 0.25 to 5.0 weight percent of acid polymer solids applied to the substrate, based on dry weight, and preferably 1.0 to 1.5 weight percent.
The bath used to impregnate the textile material according to the present invention is not limited to including only the possible ingredients heretofore mentioned, e.g., textile resin, textile resin catalyst and acid polymer. In addition, other ingredients may be employed such as, for example, emulsifying agents, wetting agents, softeners, etc., and numerous other compounds that enhance the physical characteristics of the fabric. The bath may be applied to the substrate in any suitable manner. For instance, padding of the bath onto fabric is preferred because of ease of operation at that particular stage of the development. The ingredients may be sprayed on as liquids; the substrate may be treated with vapors of the compounds if convenient; the substrate may be dipped, etc.
In general, the applicator system is adjusted to provide from to 100 weight percent wet pickup by the fabric from the pad bath. Preferably, however, it has been determined that best results are obtained by providing a wet pickup of from to weight percent from the pad bath.
When the aminoplast textile resin is applied to the substrate, e.g., textile material, along with the acid polymer they may be simultaneously applied from the same pad bath. Simultaneous application is not required though and the same results may be realized by first applying the soil release polymer followed by separate application of the textile resin and curing of the textile resin. Insofar as separate application is concerned, however, where the textile resin is applied first and cured and the soil release polymer is added separately thereafter, initial soil release ability is outstanding, but not nearly so durable as the simultaneous application or the separate addition where both textile resin and soil release polymer are present during curing of the textile resin.
According to the desires of the individual, and the dictates of the ultimate product, separate or simultaneous application of the textile resin and the soil release polymer may be employed. 'For instance, when treating a textile fabric which is to be converted into work clothes, it would be desirable to have as durable a finish as possible so that the soil release properties will be as long lasting as possible. In this situation, either a simultaneous addition or a separate addition where the soil release polymer is added first would be desired. On the other hand, where the ultimate article of manufacture is not one that will be washed or cleaned on a weekly basis, for instance, the desirable property might possibly be to have a very superior initial soil release property. An example would be upholstery for automobiles, seat covers, wall coverings, etc. For these items it may be more desirable to first apply the textile resin and separately after curing of the textile resin apply the soil release polymer.
Advantages afforded by the process of the present invention are available for substrates treated in almost any form, e.g., films, sheets, fibers, yarns, threads, fabrics or the ultimate product, e.g., a garment, etc. The presensitizing embodiment, i.e., the textile resin treatment, when employed is most advantageously conducted on substrates in the fabric, etc., form.
Garments made from the fabrics treated according to the process of the present invention require no additional steps than normal for the preparation of the conventional durable press garments. In other words, the garment may be folded and pressed on conventional equipment, for example, a Hoffman press. The pressing cycle utilized is standard in the industry and generally involves pressing of the garment for a short period of time, followed by a curing operation in an oven. Alternatively, the garment may be set in a desired configuration under hot, dry conditions, such as by hot pressing without steaming, for example, at temperatures of up to about 200 C. for as long as necessary to cure the resin.
In general, the aminopl-ast textile resin employed may be selected from several general types. According to the type resin selected, one of the following processes may be generally followed to achieve the novel garments produced by the present invention. In each type procedure, the methods of application and order of application of textile resin, soil release polymer, catalysts, etc., may be varied as described supra.
TYPE I (1) Apply textile resin having one type functional group, textile resin catalyst and soil release polymer to fabric.
(2) Dry fabric at temperature that is insufficient to initiate catalysis of the textile resin.
(3) Make garment from fabric.
(4) Press garment to produce creases where desired.
(5) Subject garment to temperature sufiicient to catalyze and cure the textile resin.
TYPE II (1) Apply textile resin having more than one type of functional group, textile resin catalysts for each type functional group and soil release polymer to fabric.
(2) Subject fabric to conditions whereby one type of functional group reacts and remaining functional groups remain dormant.
(3) Prepare garment from the fabric.
(4) Press creases where desired in garment.
(5) Subject fabric to conditions whereby the remaining functional groups are reacted with the cellulose.
TYPE III 1) Apply textile resin having more than one type of functional group, one type being sites of ethylenic unsatu-ration, a textile resin catalyst and a soil release polymer to the fabric.
(2) Dry the fabric at temperatures such that the textile resin catalyst remains dormant.
( 3) Subject the fabric to irradiation.
(4) Make a garment from the fabric.
(5) Produce desired creases in the garments.
(6) Subject the garments to textile resin curing conditions.
In each of the above types of procedures, the ultimate curing of the textile resin may be accomplished prior to the manufacture of the garment whereby a good Weish-and-wear fabric having soil release properties is pro duced.
Procedures of Types 1, II and III, as is evident, relate to the process of the present invention being applied to a textile material to afford said textile material soil release and durable press or wash-and-wear character istics. Otherwise than above shown, the acid polymer, textile resin catalyst, etc., are just applied to the desired substrate and dried, subjected to textile resin curing conditions, etc., according to the specifications described herein.
The drying temperatures that are insufiicient to initiate the catalysis are, of course, dependent upon the particular catalyst being employed. In general, however, the drying step is conducted at a rate of approximately 10 to yards per minute at temperatures ranging from about 225 to 300 F. preferably in a tenter frame. The drying temperature range overlaps to some degree with the curing temperature range set forth below. When drying in the overlapping portion of the drying and curing ranges, it is important that there be no premature curing of the textile resin. Time is the prime variable and when drying the substrate in the higher end of the drying temperature range, care must be taken to avoid heating the substrate for a time sufiicient to initiate catalysis that would at least partially cure the textile resin.
Irradiation techniques may be employed according to the process of the present invention when an aminoplast resin having ethylenic unsaturation is applied to the textile material. An insulating core transformer, operated at a potential varying between one hundred thousand electron volts and five hundred thousand electron volts may be successfully used to irradiate the textile material. Such a transformer is commercially available from High Voltage Engineering Corporation, Burlington, Mass. The amount of ionizing irradiation necessary according to the present invention is at least 32 electron volts for each ion pair formed. Thus irradiation of 32 volts and above is effective. Both high energy particle and ionizing irradiation areuseful according to the present invention. The preferred dosage of irradiation according to the present invention is in the range of one thousand rads to one hundred megarads, a rad being the amount of high energy irradiation of the type which results in energy absorption of one hundred ergs per gram of absorbing material. More preferably, however, the irradiation dosage ranges from 0.5 to 5 megarads.
Curing of the textile resin is accomplished by subjecting the textile material having the textile resin thereon to conditions such that the catalyst initiates a crosslinking reaction between functional groups of the resin and hydroxyl groups of the cellulose in the textile material and converts the resin to the the-rmoset state. When a percent synthetic fabric is treated, the resin adheres to the material and is converted to a thermoset state. Temperature'is the prime mover and generally a temperature in the range of C. to about 200 C. is sufi'icient. The curing medium that supports the necessary temperature may be any substance that is inert to both the fabric and'the ingredients applied thereto, e.g., hot air, steam, etc. In the instance where the textile resin possesses two different types of functional groups, there are actually two curing steps, the first being conducted at a temperature lower than the second and insuific ient to initiate the second type of catalysis, e. g., a first partial curing step to initiate alkaline catalysis and a subsequent curing step to initiate acid catalysis andalso convert the resin to the thermoset state.
The duration of the various processing steps varies diversely with the particular ingredients employed. In each situation, however, the treatment time is that necessary to sufiiciently cause reaction of and/ or curing of the textile resin.
Trademarks and abbreviations used throughout the specification and examples are set forth below.
Dacron T 54: A polyester fiber manufactured by E. I.
du Pont de Nemours & Co.
Dacron T-56: A polyester fiber manufaitured by E. I.
du Pont de Nemours & Co.
Dacron T-64: A polyester fiber manufactured by E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.
Fortrel: A polyester fiber produced by Celanese Fiber Company Kodel: A polyester fiber manufactured by Eastman Kodak Company Orlon: A polyacrylonitrile fiber manufactured by E. I.
du Pont de Nemours & Co.
Acrilan: A polyacrylic fiber manufactured by Chemstrand Corporation, a division of Monsanto Company Nylon 20: A polyamide fiber manufactured by E. I.
du Pont de Nemours & Co.
NMA: N-methylol acrylamide (60% aqueous solution) DHDMEU: Dihydroxy dimethylol ethylene urea (50% aqueous solution) SRP: Copolymer of 70 parts ethyl acrylatez30 parts acrylic acid (25% aqueous emulsion) Profine: Mixture of glycerol monostearate, and polyethylene glycol monostearates R-l: A commercial uron resin manufactured by Rohm & Haas Syn-Soft A-20: A polyethylene emulsion (20% solids) manufactured by Sylvan Chemical Co., Pacolet, S.C.
Alipal CO-436: An ammonium salt of a sulfated alkyl phenoxy poly(ethyleneoxy) ethanol manufactured by General Aniline and Film Corporation Triton X200: A sodium alkyl aryl sulfonate (30% solids) manufactured by Rohm & Haas Triton X202: A sodium alkyl aryl sulfonate (28% solids) manufactured by Rohm & Haas The following examples are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention, but merely to provide direction to one skilled in the art. It should be noted that a concurrent y filed companion application claims subject matter herein plus at least 1% of an ethoxylated alkyl phenol. Several of the following examples include at least 1% ethoxylated alkyl phenol, but are included only to show soil release ability in their particular environment and not to show the improvement in soil release contributed by the presence of the ethoxylated alkyl phenol. Unless otherwise stated, parts are by weight.
Example 1 A pad bath solution was prepared by dispersing in water the following ingredients: 17% N-methylol acrylamide (60% aqueous solution); 4% Zinc nitrate (50% aqueous solution of (Zn(NO -6H O); 3% Syn-Soft A-20 and 0.25% Alipal 'CO-436. The above composition was padded onto samples of Dacron/cotton (65/35) fabric to 50% wet pickup and the fabric dried on a tenter frame at 13 yards per minute at a temperature of 250 to 280 F. Moisture content of the dried fabric tested The dried fabric was then subjected to irradiation in an insulated core transformer manufactured by the High Voltage Engineering Corporation of Burlington, Mass.
Fabric was passed through the irradiation equipment at 40 yards per minute at a setting on the transformer of 500 kilovolts and 15 milliamps, the fabric being arranged in a 5 pass festoon during irradiation to produce a dosage of 2 megarads. Several pairs of mens slacks were then prepared from the treated fabric and pressed on a Hoffman press in the conventional manner and then pressed on a hot-head press at a cycle of 5 seconds steam, seconds bake and 5 seconds vacuum. The pressed slacks were then suspended from a continuously moving conveyor in an oven and cured for minutes at 325 F. After several washings, the pressed slacks retained all creases unimpaired.
Example 2 The procedure followed in Example 1 was repeated with the exception that 100% cotton fabric was treated rather than the 65/35 Dacron/cotton. After curing and repeated washing, the creases in the cotton slacks remained as originally pressed into the garments.
14 Example 3 Example 1 was again repeated with the exception that a 100% Dacron fabric was treated. Again, after repeated washings, creases in the slacks remained unimpaired.
Example 4 The following pad bath was prepared: 25% dihydroxy dimethylol ethylene urea; 4.3% magnesium chloride (MgCl '6H O); 3% Syn-Soft A-20; 0.2% Triton X-200; and 68.5% water. The above emulsion was padded onto a Dacron/Cotton 35 fabric at 50% pickup and the fabric was dried at a temperature ranging from 250 to 275 F. on a tenter frame. Moisture content of the dried fabric tested 5.6%. Mens slacks were prepared from the treated Dacron/ cotton fabric and subjected to the identical pressing and curing condition set forth in Example 1. Creases in the slacks remained unimpaired after several washes.
Example 5 Example 4 was repeated with the exception that a 100% cotton fabric was treated instead of the 65/35 Dacron/ cotton. After repeated washings, the creases in the slacks remained unimpaired.
Example 6 Example 4 was again repeated, but a 100% Dacron fabric was treated in lieu of the Dacron/cotton blend. Creases produced during the pressing cycle of the procedure were very durable to repeated washings.
Example 7 Samples of Dacron/ cotton 65/ 35 fabric were treated with a pad bath emulsion of the following formulation: 20% N-methylol acrylamide (50% aqueous solution); 10% emulsion copolymer of ethyl acrylate:acrylic acid (:30); 5% magnesium chloride catalyst; and 65% water. A pad bath prepared according to the above recipe was padded onto the Dacron/ cotton fabric at 50% pickup and the fabric dried at temperatures ranging from 200 to 280 F. to achieve a fabric moisture content of approximately 5%. The dried fabric was then given an irradiation dosage of two megarads and converted into mens slacks. Slacks prepared from the treated Dacron/cotton fabric were then pressed and cured identically to those procedures described in Example 1. After several washes, the creases produced in the slacks by the Hoffman press remained substantially unimpaired, indicating that the presence of the ethyl acrylatezacrylic acid copolymer did not adversely affect the durable press characteristics of the treated fabric.
Example 8 The procedure described in Example 7 was repeated with the exception that cotton fabric was treated instead of 65/35 Dacron/cotton fabric. Similar durable press results were obtained.
Example 9 Slacks were made from 100% Dacron that was treated according to the procedures described in Example 8. After repeated washings the creases in the slacks were virtually as sharp as when they were originally produced in the garment before curing in the oven.
Example 10 A pad bath was prepared according to the following formulation: 24% dihydroxy dimethylol ethylene urea (50% aqueous solution); 10% copolymer of ethyl acrylate:acrylic acid (70:30); 5% zinc nitrate 6% Profine; 0.2% Triton X202; and 54.8% water. The pad bath according to the above recipe was padded onto Dacron/cotton 65/ 35 fabric at 50% pickup. The fabric was then dried at temperatures ranging from 245 to 280 F. on a tenter frame. Several pairs of mens slacks were made up from the treated Dacron/ cotton (65/35) fabric after which creases were produced and the garments cured according to the procedures described in Example 1. After several washings the durability of the creases was evident by their inertness to the washing operation.
Example 11 Cotton fabric was substituted for the Dacron/cotton fabric in Example 10 and the procedures thereof were repeated. Creases in the slacks were unaffected by the repeated washings.
Example 12 The Dacron/ cotton fabric of Example 10 was replaced by 100% Dacron and Example 10 was repeated. Several washings showed no effect on the creases in the Dacron slacks.
Example 13 A pad bath was prepared according to the following recipe: 10% copolymer of ethyl acrylatezacrylic acid Group A were stained with a No. 6 crude oil and subjected to one home washing in a Kenmore automatic washer, using one cup of Tide, a commercial detergent, and a Water temperature of 140 F. The slacks in Group B were first washed five times under wash conditions identical to those for Group A. The Group B slacks, after their fifth wash were then stained with a No. 6 crude oil and subjected to one further wash under the same wash conditions as set forth above. After each wash, the slacks were dried in a Kenmore dryer at a temperature of from about 150 to 165 F. for approximately minutes. After the designated number of washings, the residual oil stains in the slacks were compared to a set of standards having numerical ratings from 1.0 to 5.0, 1.0 being very poor and 5.0 representing virtually complete removal of the stain. Ratings for the tested slacks are set forth below in Table I and are indicative of the soil release property of the fabrics. Controls for the various fabrics are also included and represent slacks made from the fabric that was un- 20 treated; and the slacks were just pressed as per normal procedures.
TABLE I.SOIL RELEASE DATA FOR COTTON, DACRON/GOITON AND DACRON FABRICS Soil Release Rating Sample Fabric Treatment Control 1 1 Wash Control 1 5 Washes 1 Dacron/cotton (/35) NMA 1.5 1.7 2 Cotton NM- 1.8 1.9
Dacron NMA 1.0 1.0 4 Dacron/cotton (65/35) DHDMEU 1. 1.5 1.7 5 Cotton DHDRTEU 1.7 1.8 6 Da DHDMEU 1.0 1.0 7 Dacron/cotton (GS/3s SRP and NMA 1 2. 7 4. 5 4.0 8. Cotton NMA and SR? 3. 5 4.2 3- 9 9 Dacron NMA and SR? 1.4 4.0 10 Dacron/cotton (05/35) DHDlVIEU and SRP 3.3 3-6 Cotton DHDMEU and SRP. 3.3 3. O Dacr DHDMEU and SRP 3. 1 2.0 Dacron/cotton (65135 SR1 4. 5 4.0 0t SR1. 4.6 3.0 Dacron SRP 3.5 1.6 Dacron/cotton (GS/35).... SRP 2 4.2 4. 17 Cotton SRP 2 4.5 2.9 Dacron sar 2.0
1 No treatment was rendered to control samples.
2 N0 catalyst in pad bath. (:30); 5% zinc nitrate (Zn(NO -6H O); and water. The above emulsion was padded onto Dacron/cotton (65/35) fabric at 50% pickup and the fabric dried at a temperature ranging from 250 to 275 F. Mens slacks were prepared from the treated fabric and pressed and cured as per the procedures defined in Example 1.
Example 14 Example 13 was repeated except that cotton fabric was used in place of the Dacron/cotton fabric.
Example 15 Example 13 was repeated except that 100% Dacron was treated in lieu of the Dacron/cotton fabric.
Example 16 Example 17 Example 16 was repeated except that a 100% cotton fabric was treated in lieu of the Dacron/ cotton fabric.
Example 18 Example 16 was repeated, but using a 100% Dacron fabric.
Example 19 .Two sets of slacks were taken from each of the groups treated, as described in Examples 1-18. In each case, the slacks were identified by the number of the example, and further identified by sufiixes A and B. Slacks in From the data set forth in Table I the following conclusions may be drawn: (a) soil release ability for Dacron/cotton and Dacron fabrics is substantially improved when the soil release polymer is added, (b) the finish afforded thefabric by the soil release polymer is enhanced when the soil release polymer is deployed with a textile resin and a textile resin catalyst and the treated fabric cured; (c) soil release ability of each of the fabrics is reduced when only the textile resin is employed to afford the fabric with a durable press property, whereas the addition of the soil-release polymer more than compensates for the reduction brought about by the textile resin above.
Test washes for obtaining soil release data were conducted using the commercial detergent Tide, marketed by Procter & Gamble. This particular detergent does not however, contribute specifically to the soil release ability. Numerous of the commercial detegents were rated against one commercial detergent as a standard. There was only a slight difference in these detergents noted, so one cup full of any of them should perform satisfactorily.
Example 20 To evaluate the breadth of the present invention regarding the fabrics which may be improved as to soil release, a number of fabrics were soiled with a No. 6 crude oil, washed one time in a Kenmore automatic washer with one cup of Tide at a wash water temperature of F. The fabric was then dried for approximately 40 minutes at a temperature of from about to about F. and rated against the soil release standards referred to above. Samples of the same fabrics were padded with an emulsion containing 12% dihydroxy dimethylol ethylene urea; 10% copolymer of ethyl acrylate:acrylic acid (70:30); 5% zinc nitrate (Zn(NO -6H O); and 73% water. The samples were then cured in a conventional garment cure oven for 15 minutes at C. Each TABLE IL-SOIL RELEASE DATA 5 Fabric Untreated DHDME U Control and SRP Dacron T54 1. 4 4. Dacron T-56- 2. 8 4. 2. 4 4. 2 4. o 4. 0 3. 5 4. 2 1. 3 4. 4 1. 2 4. 0 3. 8 4. 3 4. 0 4. 2 3. 4 4. 6 3. 6 4. 4 l 5 2. 5 3. 5
From Table II it is evident that with the exception of viscose, every type fabric treated showed improvement in soil release ability. Moreover, the sample of viscose fabric was not resin treated and as pointed out supra resin treatment reduces the soil release ability of the fabric. Hence, were the fabric resin treated so as to afford durable press properties to the fabric, then some soil release improvement would be evident. Magnitude of improvement of soil release with the various fabrics was dependent primarily on the original soil release ability. For example, in the case of cotton as compared to any of the Dacrons, the improvement is not nearly so great, for the cotton originally had much better soil release than the Dacron. Improvement is shown, however, in every instance.
Having determined that a copolymer of ethyl acrylate: acrylic acid (70:30) afforded superior soil release properties to the various fabrics, it was encumbent to establish the limits of operability of the soil release polymers. Such efforts have been expanded in two ways. First the composition range of the ethyl acrylate:acrylic acid copolymer system was investigated, and secondly, other polymer systems were tested for their soil release ability. Table III sets forth soil release performance for various ethyl 40 acrylate:acrylic acid compositions and Table IV sets forth soil release performance of various other copolymers and terpolymer systems.
Example 21 A series of copolymers of ethyl acrylate and acrylic acid were prepared having varied proportions of acrylate and acid. Each of these polymers was then divided into two parts, A and B. Part A of each polymer was padded onto Dacron/cotton (/35) fabric and the other part used to make films. The pad baths containing the various ethyl acrylate-acrylic acid polymers had the following formulation: 10% ethyl acrylate-acrylic acid polymer; and 90% water.
After drying the impregnated fabric, and curing the fabric, samples of the fabric were stained with a No. 6 crude oil and washed and further samples were first washed five times, then stained and washed once more. After the staining and washing, each sample was rated for soil release ability by comparison with the standards discussed supra. Results of the soil release tests are reported 60 in Table III. Part B of each polymer sample as stated above was made into a film. After the film was cast and air dried, it was then immersed in water for 16 hours to determine the water of imbibition thereof. Water of imbibition is reported for each polymer as percent water absorbed after 16 hours per weight of the film. Water of imbibition data is also reported in Table III.
Additionally, pad baths were prepared containing the following ingredients: 18% N-methylol acrylamide; 10% ethyl acrylate:acrylic acid polymer; 4% zinc nitrate; and 68% water. The ethyl acrylate:acrylic acid polymer composition varied in the pad baths prepared as identified in .Table III. After padding the emulsion onto Dacron/ cotton (65/35) fabric the fabric was dried at temperatures ranging from 250 to 275 F., subjected to an irradiation 18 dosage of 3 megarads and cured for 30 minutes at 130 C. The fabric was then stained, washed and rated identically to the above fabric where only the soil release polymer was applied. Data is reported in Table III.
TABLE III SOIL RELEASE ABILITY AND WATER OF IMBIBITION DATA FOR ETHYL ACRYLATE; ACRYLIC ACID COPOLYMERS Polymer Composition Stain and Water of Stain Wash Imbibition Ethyl Acrylic (a)/ (b) (a)/(b) Wt. percent Acrylate Acid 1 Wash 5 Washes Increase percent percent 100 0 1.5/1.5 1.5/1.8 49 90 10 2. 5/2. 0 2.0/2.2 89 20 2. 7/2. 0 2.0/3.2 167 70 30 4.4/4.0 3. 0/4. 0 312 60 40 3.7/3.4 3.0/3. 6 50 50 3.5/3. 0 3.0/3. 2 30 70 4. 5 3.0 20 80 3. 8 3.0 10 3.8 3.0 0 4. 0/2. 8 3.0/3.0 Untreated Control 2.6/1.5 (c) 2.7/1. 7 (c) Water soluble.
(a) Polymer only padded onto fabric. (b) Resin, catalyst and polymer padded. I (c) Resin treated only (n-methylol acrylamlde) Study of data set forth in Table III indicates that an acrylic acid content of less than 10% is undesirable for promoting soil release from the Dacron/cotton fabric. Moreover the water of imbibition data corresponding to the polymer compositions provides an excellent criteria for determining whether the polymer will successfully afford soil release properties to a fabric when the polymer contains more than 10% acid. When the water of imbibition of the film falls below 89%, then there is insufficient water absorption to remove the oily soil from the garment during washing.
Example 22 A series of polymers were padded onto a Dacron/cotton 65/ 35 fabric in the following pad bath formulation: 16% N-methylol acrylamide; 10% polymer; 4% zinc nitrate catalyst; and 70% water. The various formulations were padded onto the fabric and the fabric was dried, irradiated, cured, stained, washed and rated as previously described. The specific polymers employed in the pad bath formulation and the soil release data are reported in Table IV.
TABLE Iv.-s.0IL RELEASE DATA FOR VARIOUS POLY- MERS PADDED ONTO DACRQN/COTTON (65/35) FAB- RIC ALONG WITH RESIN AND CATALYST Soil release rating,
Example 23 In further attempting to define the polymers that successfully afford soil release, the water of imbibition was determined for films prepared from a group of polymers. The films were cast, air dried, and immersed in excess water for a period of 16 hours. Water absorbed by the film was then determined and is reported in Table V as weight percent increase. Also, each of the polymers, as set forth in Table V was incorporated into a pad bath of the following recipe: 10% polymer, 18% N-methylol acrylamide, 4% zinc nitrate catalyst (Zn(NO -6H O) and 68% water.
Two samples each of Dacron/cotton (65/35) fabric were padded with the formulations prepared, dried and cured. Each sample was then stained with No. 6 crude oil and each set of samples given the 1 and w'ashes as described in Example 1. After washing, the stains were rated against the soil release standards. Data is reported in Table V along with water of imbibition.
TABLE V.SOIL RELEASE AND W'ATER OF DJBIBITION DATA FOR ACID POLYMERS In furtherance of establishing the operability of the soil release polymers of the present invention, a more quantitative test was followed to indicate soil release properties of the treated fabric.
is vastly superior to the conventional durable press fabric in releasing soil during a conventional wash cycle.
Example Earlier in the specification, information is set forth relevant to the order of application of the textile resin and the soil release polymer. Tests were conducted to determine criticality, if any, of the order of application and/or whether there is any synergism between the various compounds in the pad bath. Dacron/cotton (65/35) fabric Was used in each test. Pad baths included aqueous emulsions of the materials set forth in Table VII. In cases where drying, irradiation an-d/ or curing are indicated, procedures were followed as set forth in Example 1. Three sets of samples were prepared in each instance, one of which was stained with No. 6 crude oil and washed as described supra, one of which was washed five times, stained and washed once more and the third of which was washed ten times, stained and given a further wash. These data, of course, provide good readings on both initial soil release ability and durability of the soil release finish. After the final wash, each of the samples was compared to the soil release rating standards and given a numerical rating of 1.0 to 5.0, 5.0 being complete removal of the stain. Data are recorded in Table VII.
TABLE VII.-STUDY OF SYNERGISM BETWEEN NiAJOR AND BATH OONSTITUENTS AND ORDER OF AP- PLICATION OF TEXTILE RESIN AND SOIL RELEASE POLYMER Soil Release Rating After W sl Sample Pad Bath Cure Pad Bath Irtra- Cure Wash Pad Bath Cure a res a ion F=10% copolyrner of ethyl acrylatezacrylic acid (70:30) 25% emulsion).
G=2.3% Syn-Fae N-905. 183=24% dimethylol dihydroxy ethylene urea.
Example 24 A sample of Dacron/cotton (65/35) fabric was padded with a pad bath emulsion comprising 18% N-methylol acrylarnide (60% aqueous solution); 10% copolymer of ethylacrylate:acrylic acid (70:30); 4 .3% zinc nitrate solution of Zn(NO -6H O); 2% Syn-Fae N905 and 4% Profine at 50% pickup. The fabric was then dried on a tenter frame at 13 yards per minute at temperatures ranging from 240 to 270 F.; subjected to irradiation by the method described in Example 1 and cured by the procedures prescribed in Example 1. A second sample of Dacron/cotton (65/35) fabric having been treated by a conventional method to impart durable press properties was compared to the above treated fabric. Both the conventional durable press fabrics were soiled with a radioactive sebacious soil, then washed once in a conventional automatic washing machine with one cup of All, a commercial detergent in wash water having a temperature of 105 F., and tested to determine the amount of soil remaining on the fabric. Data is reported in Table VI.
TABLE VI.-RADIOACTIVE SOIL RELEASE DATA ON SOIL RELEASE TREATED-DURABLE PRESS DAC-RON/COTTON (1050/?)(figjsfslhlTREATED DURABLE PRESS DACRON/COT- Conven- Durable tional Press Durable and Soil Press, Release, Percent Percent Solling Tests: Sebacions Soil Pickup 5.9 5. 7 Soil Retention, 105:
Nash in ALL" 82 25 The above data shows positively that the fabric treated to have both durable press and soil release characteristics The data recorded in Table VII indicate that best overall results are obtained when the textile resin and soil release polymer are simultaneously applied to the fabric or when the soil release polymer is applied first followed by the textile resin, curing as shown by Samples 2, 3, 5, 6 and 10. On the other hand, where the soil release polymer is added last and cured after the textile resin has already beeen cured, there is excellent initial soil release, but durability is adversely affected, as shown in Samples 1, 4 and 9. These data further show also that when the soil release polymers are cured in the presence of the textile resin and catalyst, durability of the soil release ability is perceptibly improved. As mentioned before, it is believed that this phenomenon is brought about by some reaction between the textile resin and soil release polymer during curing of the resin. The mechanism is not, however, known. In fact, the durability might be afforded by a physical bond or a combination chemical reaction and physical bond.
Example 26 The following experiment was conducted to determine the ability of fabrics treated by the process of the present invention to repel deposition of oily materials and grime from dirty wash water. The following pad bath was prepared and labeled formulation A:24% R-l, 6% magnesium chloride catalyst, 3% Profine, 2.3% Syn-Fae N- 905 agent and 64.7% water. A second pad bath labeled formulation B, was prepared identical to the above-identified formulation with the exception that 10% of a soil release polymer, a copolymer of ethylacrylatezacrylic acid (70:30), was included and the amount of water was reduced proportionately, i.e., (54.7% present). These formulations were padded onto Dacron/ cotton (.65 35) shirt- 21 ing. The fabric was then dried and precured at 325 F. for 1 /2 minutes, after which shirts were tailored from the fabric. The shirts. were then labeled A (formulation A) and; B (formulation B) and'subjected to five home washings in. a Kenmore automatic washer using one cup of Tide and wash water of 140 F. Prior to placingshirts A' and B in the same washer, a quantity of oil and dirt was put into the water. After the five washes, theshirts were tested in a Hunter color meter manufactured by Hunter Associates Laboratory, Inc., 5421 Briar Ridge Road, McLean, Va., to determine the comparative soil pickup by the shirtsin the washer.
The Hunter instrument employs a polychromatic light source and matchedset of barrier-layer photoelectric cells. One photoelectric cell is illuminated directly by the light source while the other photoelectric cell is illuminated by light reflected from a fabric sample. Measurements are made of the degree of unbalance, existing between the photoelectric .cells, from the current generated by the photoelectric cell receiving direct illumination and the current generated by the photoelectric cell receiving fabric .refiected illumination. Values may be read from digital dials onthe device of three visually-uniform color scales, the three, readings being L, a and 17 wherein:
L =measures lightness and varies from white to zero for black; a=measures redness when greeness when minus; b=measures yellowness when blueness when minus.
100 for perfect plus, ,gray when zero, and
plus, gray when zero, and
A value for whiteness (W) may be computed from these values by means of the following formula:
Likewise additional shirts labeled A and B were sent out to a commercial laundry and tested for whiteness after commercial washings without soil addition. Data are reported in Table VIII.
was dried as described above. All of the fabric samples were then compared to a set of stained standards; The standar'ds show different degrees of a NoEG'crude oll "stain and are rated from 1.0 to 5.0.A rating of 120 indicat'esalm'ost'no removal of. the stain and 5.0 indicates virtually complete removal ofthe stain. After comparing the fabrics with the standards, eachwas'given a numerical'rating. These data appear in Table IX.
,TABLE 1X.sorL RELEASE DATAusrNo DACRON/CO'I TON FABRIC AND A COP'OLYMER OF ETHYLACRYLATE: ACRYLIC ACID (70:30) 1 Soil'Belease Rating Sample Treatment Stain and 5 Washes, 1 Wash Stain and J Wash A ';."Dry; "3.8 3.5 B Dry and Cure 4.2 4.3 Untreated Control 2.7 2.8
Data in Table IX indicate that the Dacron/cotton control that was untreated,'then stained and washed did not release the crude oil nearly aswell as both Samples A and B that were treated with the soilrelease polymer.
What is claimed is:
1..A process for imparting soil release and durable press characteristics to a textile material comprising linear polyester fibers which comprises applying thereto an aminoplast textile resin, a textile resin catalyst and a synthetic acid emulsion polymer which is stable'under the polymer is prepared by emulsion polymerizing a. monomeric mixture comprising an acrylic ester and an acrylic acid. TABLE VIII.SOIL REDEPOSITION DATA FOR WHITE SHIRTS Treatment Wash 'L' a' -b W Shirt A l -1 Oily 83. 4 +2. 5 +3. 1 74. 1 Shirt 13 R-l-I-SRP do 88. 6 +2. 7 87.4 Shirt 1 Normal commerc l +1. 7 99. 3 Shirt B R1+SRP do +1. 6 102.0 Control None ,7
From the data in Table VIII is therefore evident that all of the shirts lost some of their whiteness after the washings. Shirt B in both the oily washes and the commercial washes retained their whiteness better than Shirt A in each type wash. This positively indicates that less soil was deposited from the wash water onto Shirt B, the shirt having the soil release polymers applied thereto.
Example 27 A pad bath formulation was prepared from the following ingredients: 10% copolymer of ethylacrylatezacrylic acid (70:30) (25% solids), 90% water, and padded onto Dacron/cotton (65/35) fabric at 50% pickup from the pad bath. The fabric was then dried in a tenter frame at 10 yards per minute at a temperature ranging from 250 to 275 F. After drying, the fabric was divided into two separate lots. A and B. Fabric in lot B Was further subjected to textile resin curing conditions (325 F. for 15 minutes). Both A and B lots were then subdivided into two further groups, A1 and A-2 and B-1 and B-2. Fabric from A-1 and B1 were stained with a No. 6 crude oil and washed one time in a Kenmore automatic washer with one cup Tide, a commercial detergent marketed by Procter & Gamble. Wash Water temperature was 140 F. After washing, the fabric was then dried for approximately minutes at a temperature of about 150 to 165 F. Fabric A-2 and B-2 were first subjected to five washings as defined above; stained with No. 6 crude oil; and then washed one more time. After the last wash the fabric 4. The process as defined in claim 1 wherein the acid polymer is prepared by emulsion polymerizing a monomeric mixture comprising about 50 to parts of an acrylic ester and about 20 to 50 parts of an acrylic acid.
5. The process as defined in claim 1 wherein the textile material is a polyester/cellulosic textile material, the textile resin is selected from the class consisting of N- methylol acrylamide and dihydroxy dimethylol ethylene urea, the acid polymer is prepared by emulsion polymerizing a monomeric mixture comprising an acrylic ester and an acrylic acid, and the textile resin on the textile material is heated to a temperature in the range of about C. to 200 C. for about 1 to 30 minutes.
6. A textile material having soil release and durable press characteristics, prepared according to the process of claim 1.
7. A cellulosic containing textile material having soil release and durable press characteristics, prepared according to the process of claim 5.
8. A process for imparting soil release and durable press characteristics to a textile material comprising linear polyester fibers which comprises applying thereto an aqueous dispersion comprising (a) about 2 to 30 percent of an aminoplast textile resin, (b) about 2.5 to 40 percent of a film-forming synthetic acid polymer which is stable under the conditions of application, said polymer being prepared by emulsion polymerizing a monomeric mixture comprising about 50 to 80 parts ethyl acrylate and about 20 to 50 parts acrylic acid, and (c) up to 15 percent of a catalyst selected from the group consisting of zinc nitrate and magnesium chloride; and heating said textile material at a temperature in the range of about 130 C. to 200 C. for about 1 to 30 minutes, whereby a film is formed on said textile material.
9. A process-for imparting soil release and durable press characteristics to a polyethylene terephthalate/cotton (65/35) textile material which comprises:
(a) applyin thereto an aqueous dispersion consisting essentially of about 2 to 30% of an aqueous solution of a textile resin selected from the class consisting of N-methylol acrylamide and dihydroxy dimethylol ethylene urea, about 1 to of an aqueous solution of a catalyst selected from the group consisting of zinc nitrate and magnesium chloride, about 2.5 to 40% of an aqueous emulsion of a film-forming synthetic acid polymer prepared by polymerizing a monomeric mixture comprising an acrylic ester and at least weight percent of an acrylic acid, and water; said aqueous dispersion being applied to the textile material in the range of to weight percent of the textile material proportion of acid polymer solids on said textile material being from about 0.25 to about 5.0 weight percent based on the dry weight of the textile material;
(b) drying the textile material at a temperature in the range of about 225 F. to 300 F. for a time insufficient to initiate curing of the textile resin; and
(c) heating the textile material at a temperature in the range of about C. to 200 C. for a time sufii cient to cure the textile resin.
10. A process for imparting soil release and durable press characteristics to a textile material comprising linear polyester a-nd cellulosic fibers, which comprises applying thereto N-methylol acrylamide, an acid textile resin catalyst and a synthetic acid emulsion polymer which is stable under the conditions of application, subjecting said textile material to high energy irradiation to eilect addition polymerization of the vinyl group of said N-methylol acrylamide with itself and with the cellulose, and heating said textile material to react the methylol group of said N- methylol acrylamide with the hydroxy groups of the cellulose under the influence of said acid catalyst, said acid emulsion polymer comprising at least 20 weight percent acid calculated as acrylic acid and the proportion of acid polymer solids on said textile material being from about 0.25 to about 5.0 weight percent based on the dry weight of the textile material.
References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,725,308 11/1955 Nickerson 8-1163 X 2,731,364 1/1956 Reibnitz 8-1163 X 2,754,280 7/1956 Brown et al. 811S.6 X 2,755,198 7/1956 Stewart 8-116.3 X 2,804,402 8/1957 Williams 8-1163 X 2,810,624 10/1957 Wardell 8-1163 X 2,868,748 1/1959 Frazier et al. 8-115.6 X 2,977,665 4/1961 McElrath 8-1163 X 2,987,421 6/1961 Sherwood 117-139.4 3,011,917 12/1961 Dreisbach et a1. 117-1395 3,049,446 8/1962 Goldstein et al. 8-1163 X 3,079,279 2/1963 Van Loo 8-1163 X 3,125,405 3/1964 Gardon 8-1163 3,125,406 3/1964 Herman 8-1163 3,152,920 10/1964 Caldwell et al. 117-1388 3,236,685 2/1966 Caldwell et al. 117-1388 3,246,946 4/ 1966 Gardon 8-1163 OTHER REFERENCES Stillo et al.: Tex. Res. 1., vol. 27, pp. 949-961 (1957).
Mazzeno et al.: A.D.R., p. 299-p. 302, May 5, 1958.
Nuessle et al.: Tex. Res. 1., vol. 33, pp. 146-160 (1963).
Walsh et al.: Tex. Res. 1., vol. 35, pp. 648-654 (1965).
Peper et al.: A.D.R., vol. 54, No. 21, p. 36-42, Oct. 11, 1965.
NORMAN G. TORCHIN, Primary Examiner.
I. TRAVIS BROWN, Examiner.
J. C. CANNON, Assistant Examiner.
11mm STATES PATENT or has CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Patent No. 3,377,249 April 9, 1968 Francis W. Marco It is hereby certified that error appears in the above numbered patent requiring correction and that the said Letters Patent should read as corrected below Column 1 line 50 "only" should read oily Column 9 line 61 cancel "to" Column 12 line 72 "manufaitured" should read manufactured Column 16 line 6 "their" should read the Column 18 TABLE III first second, third fourth and fifth columns line 3 thereof, "80" "20" "Z 7/2 .0" "2 0/3 2" "167" should read 80 2O 3 7/3 0 3 0/3 2 and 167 same TABLE III same columns line 4 thereof "70" "30" "4.4/4 .0" "3 .O/4 O" "312" should read 70 30 4 3/4 0 3 0/4 0 and 312 Columns 19 and 20 TABLE VII in the footnote line 3 thereof, "X=4 3% zinc ntirate (Zn[NO 3 6H O) should read X=4 3% zinc nitrate (Zn (N0 2 oHzO) Column 21 line 63 "lots should read lots Column .22 line 9 "DACRON/COT" should read DACRON/COT- Column 23 lines 22 to 25 cancel "proportion of acid polymer solids on said textile material being from about 0 25 to about 5 0 weight precent based on the dry weight of the textile material and insert and being stable under the conditions of application;
Signed and sealed this 11th day of November 1969 (SEAL) Attest:
EDWARD M.FLETCHER,JR. WILLIAM E SCHUYLER, JR. Attesting Officer Commissioner of Patents
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2725308 *||Feb 27, 1953||Nov 29, 1955||Monsanto Chemicals||Composition for and treatment of textile materials|
|US2731364 *||Aug 16, 1952||Jan 17, 1956||Basf Ag||Process for improving cellulose textile materials and product thereof|
|US2754280 *||Apr 23, 1954||Jul 10, 1956||Rohm & Haas||Emulsions of ionically cross-linked resins and methods for making them|
|US2755198 *||Feb 27, 1953||Jul 17, 1956||Monsanto Chemicals||Novel compositions and treatment of textile materials|
|US2804402 *||Nov 18, 1953||Aug 27, 1957||Monsanto Chemicals||Treatment of cellulose containing textile materials and compositions therefor|
|US2810624 *||Apr 8, 1954||Oct 22, 1957||Rohm & Haas||Cellulose plisse fabric and method of producing by applying 1, 3-bis(hydroxy-methyl)-2-imidazolidone and chemical shrinking agent|
|US2868748 *||Sep 23, 1955||Jan 13, 1959||American Cyanamid Co||Emulsions of acrylic polymers|
|US2977665 *||Jul 5, 1957||Apr 4, 1961||William W Mcelrath||Process for non-shrinking fibrous materials|
|US2987421 *||Sep 19, 1955||Jun 6, 1961||Goodrich Co B F||Composition for treating textile materials, method, and article produced thereby|
|US3011917 *||Feb 16, 1956||Dec 5, 1961||Dow Chemical Co||Process for preparing permanently stiffened textiles|
|US3049446 *||Feb 5, 1960||Aug 14, 1962||Sun Chemical Corp||Process for the manufacture of urea, glyoxal and formaldehye reaction product useful for improving cellulosic textile materials|
|US3079279 *||Feb 3, 1961||Feb 26, 1963||American Cyanamid Co||Blends of imidazolidinones and aminoplasts and method for finishing cellulose containing textile material|
|US3125405 *||Jun 9, 1959||Mar 17, 1964||Method of crease-proofing cellulosic|
|US3125406 *||Feb 28, 1961||Mar 17, 1964||Process for making them|
|US3152920 *||Sep 20, 1962||Oct 13, 1964||Eastman Kodak Co||Antistatic, soil-resistant coatings|
|US3236685 *||Jun 20, 1962||Feb 22, 1966||Eastman Kodak Co||Process for treating textile fibers and other shaped products with coatings|
|US3246946 *||Feb 19, 1963||Apr 19, 1966||Rohm & Haas||Method of crease-proofing cellulosic fabrics and fabrics obtained|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3521993 *||Nov 15, 1967||Jul 28, 1970||Burlington Industries Inc||Soil releasing textiles|
|US3540835 *||Aug 11, 1967||Nov 17, 1970||Deering Milliken Res Corp||Carboxylic acid group containing copolymer is applied to textile which has been treated with an aminoplast resin to improve soil release characteristics thereof|
|US3617188 *||Nov 26, 1968||Nov 2, 1971||Crompton Shenandoah Co||Soil release fabrics and method for producing same|
|US3632416 *||Oct 27, 1967||Jan 4, 1972||Nat Patent Dev Corp||Fibrous textile materials impregnated with hydroxyalkyl methacrylate casting syrups|
|US3632420 *||Sep 13, 1968||Jan 4, 1972||Deering Milliken Res Corp||Textile material with improved soil release characteristics|
|US3632421 *||Dec 9, 1968||Jan 4, 1972||Deering Milliken Res Corp||Textile material with soil release characteristics|
|US3632422 *||Dec 4, 1969||Jan 4, 1972||Burlington Industries Inc||Textile fabric having soil release finish and method of making same|
|US3634131 *||Feb 12, 1969||Jan 11, 1972||Deering Milliken Res Corp||Fugitively colored solid materials|
|US3649165 *||Aug 4, 1966||Mar 14, 1972||Deering Milliken Res Corp||Soil-release characteristics of textile materials|
|US3650801 *||Jul 25, 1968||Mar 21, 1972||Burlington Industries Inc||Oil release for 100% synthetic fibers|
|US3652212 *||Apr 17, 1967||Mar 28, 1972||Deering Milliken Res Corp||Multi-step in situ polymer formation to produce fabric having improved soiling characteristics|
|US3660010 *||Dec 17, 1969||May 2, 1972||Nat Starch Chem Corp||Treating textiles with soil release agents|
|US3717687 *||Mar 24, 1971||Feb 20, 1973||Lubrizol Corp||Composition and method of imparting premanent press and soil release properties to fabrics|
|US3778226 *||Apr 15, 1970||Dec 11, 1973||Du Pont||Durable-press and soil-release compositions|
|US3885911 *||Oct 14, 1968||May 27, 1975||Deering Milliken Res Corp||Textile material with soil release|
|US3900606 *||Oct 17, 1973||Aug 19, 1975||Pennwalt Corp||Temporary soil release resins applied to fabrics by spraying|
|US3909476 *||Oct 12, 1973||Sep 30, 1975||Pennwalt Corp||Temporary soil release resins applied to fabrics in laundering|
|US3922723 *||Jul 24, 1973||Dec 2, 1975||Karel Popper||Methods and articles for deodorizing using ion exchange manufacture|
|US3975154 *||Jun 9, 1975||Aug 17, 1976||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture||Process for producing and utilizing durable press fabrics with strong acid grafts|
|US3993830 *||Oct 23, 1973||Nov 23, 1976||Colgate-Palmolive Company||Soil-release finish|
|US4007305 *||Dec 23, 1974||Feb 8, 1977||Basf Wyandotte Corporation||Method of imparting nondurable soil release and soil repellency properties to textile materials|
|US4008293 *||Aug 1, 1974||Feb 15, 1977||Ppg Industries, Inc.||Crosslinkable coating compositions and method of using the same|
|US4081383 *||Sep 2, 1976||Mar 28, 1978||Rohm And Haas Company||Anti-soiling treatment for carpets and carpet yarns|
|US4092107 *||May 3, 1976||May 30, 1978||Akzona Incorporated||Process for finishing textile materials containing cellulose fibers|
|US4155123 *||Oct 28, 1975||May 22, 1979||Paul M. Klein, Jr.||Deodorizing manufacture for the foot using ion exchange material|
|US4318956 *||Aug 15, 1980||Mar 9, 1982||Rohm And Haas Company||Soil release on polyester textiles using cationic water soluble addition polymer|
|US4333183 *||Nov 9, 1978||Jun 8, 1982||Karel Popper||Deodorizing methods and articles using ion exchange manufacture|
|US4672005 *||Oct 22, 1984||Jun 9, 1987||Intera Corporation||Process for improving polymer substrate properties, and modified polymers produced thereby|
|US5658651 *||Sep 29, 1995||Aug 19, 1997||Creative Products Resource, Inc.||Fabric treatment and softener system for in-dryer use|
|US5968207 *||Feb 20, 1998||Oct 19, 1999||Milliken & Company||Esterified triclosan derivatives as improved textile antimicrobial agents|
|US5972041 *||Jan 8, 1998||Oct 26, 1999||Creative Products Resource, Inc.||Fabric-cleaning kits using sprays, dipping solutions or sponges containing fabric-cleaning compositions|
|US5997586 *||Jan 13, 1998||Dec 7, 1999||Smith; James A.||Dry-cleaning bag with an interior surface containing a dry-cleaning composition|
|US6025284 *||Dec 1, 1997||Feb 15, 2000||Marco; Francis W.||Sun protective fabric|
|US6033608 *||Mar 11, 1998||Mar 7, 2000||Milliken & Company||Method for making foam rubber tree bark-configured articles having manmade textiles backings|
|US6036727 *||Sep 29, 1997||Mar 14, 2000||Creative Products Resource, Inc.||Anhydrous dry-cleaning compositions containing polysulfonic acid, and dry-cleaning kits for delicate fabrics|
|US6086634 *||Aug 4, 1997||Jul 11, 2000||Custom Cleaner, Inc.||Dry-cleaning compositions containing polysulfonic acid|
|US6179880||Jun 29, 1999||Jan 30, 2001||Custom Cleaner, Inc.||Fabric treatment compositions containing polysulfonic acid and organic solvent|
|US6180178||Oct 22, 1998||Jan 30, 2001||Milliken & Company||Method of producing support garments by applying polyurethane coatings to specific areas of fabric|
|US6194330||Jul 31, 1998||Feb 27, 2001||Milliken & Company||Polymer latex for ultraviolet absorbtion on fabric|
|US6197072||Oct 18, 1999||Mar 6, 2001||Milliken & Company||Esterified triclosan derivatives as improved textile antimicrobial agents|
|US6238736||Jul 24, 1998||May 29, 2001||Custom Cleaner, Inc.||Process for softening or treating a fabric article|
|US6254932||Mar 14, 2000||Jul 3, 2001||Custom Cleaner, Inc.||Fabric softener device for in-dryer use|
|US6263707||Sep 20, 1999||Jul 24, 2001||Milliken & Company||Opaque heat-moldable circular knit support fabrics having very high spandex content|
|US6482757||Jan 26, 2001||Nov 19, 2002||Milliken & Company||Polymer latex for ultraviolet absorption on different substrates|
|US6584668||May 20, 2002||Jul 1, 2003||Milliken & Company||Method of manufacturing yarns and fabrics having a wash-durable non-electrically conductive topically applied metal-based finish|
|US6640371||May 15, 2002||Nov 4, 2003||Milliken & Company||Topical incorporation of solid antimicrobial compounds on yarn surfaces through high pressure|
|US6770581||Mar 17, 2000||Aug 3, 2004||Milliken & Company||Absorbent fabrics, products, and methods|
|US6774067||Mar 15, 2001||Aug 10, 2004||Milliken & Company||Mat and method of manufacturing a mat|
|US7012033||Jan 24, 2003||Mar 14, 2006||Milliken And Company||Fluorochemical-containing textile finishes that exhibit wash-durable soil release and moisture wicking properties|
|US7396866||Dec 15, 2004||Jul 8, 2008||3M Innovative Properties Company||Fluorochemical diesters as repellent polymer melt additives|
|US20030144410 *||Nov 13, 2002||Jul 31, 2003||Vogt Kirkland W.||Polymer latex for ultraviolet absorption on different substrates|
|US20030200613 *||May 15, 2003||Oct 30, 2003||Green David E.||Topical incorporation of solid antimicrobial compounds on yarn surfaces through high pressure methods|
|US20040224587 *||Jan 24, 2003||Nov 11, 2004||Hayes Heather J.||Fluorochemical-containing textile finishes that exhibit wash-durable soil release and moisture wicking properties|
|US20060101585 *||Dec 28, 2005||May 18, 2006||Hayes Heather J||Fluorochemical-containing textile finishes that exhibit wash-durable soil release and moisture wicking properties|
|US20060128850 *||Dec 15, 2004||Jun 15, 2006||Jariwala Chetan P||Fluorochemical diesters as repellent polymer melt additives|
|US20060135673 *||Dec 15, 2004||Jun 22, 2006||Temperante John A||Fluorochemical esters blends as repellent polymer melt additives|
|US20090246258 *||Mar 28, 2008||Oct 1, 2009||Piyush Shukla||Antimicrobial and odor adsorbing textile|
|USRE28914 *||Jul 11, 1972||Jul 20, 1976||Deering Milliken Research Corporation||Treatment of a cellulosic-containing textile with a fluorocarbon, an aminoplast, and a synthetic acid copolymer, and textile obtained therefrom|
|EP0048447A2 *||Sep 17, 1981||Mar 31, 1982||SWS Silicones Corporation||Process for preparing silylated organic polymers and their use for treating textile materials|
|WO2014031790A1||Aug 21, 2013||Feb 27, 2014||Allylix, Inc.||Nootkatone as an insecticide and insect repellent|
|U.S. Classification||81/15.6, 525/164, 525/296, 525/244, 525/163, 38/144|
|International Classification||D06M15/273, D06M15/21, D06M15/263, D06M15/29, D06M15/267|
|Cooperative Classification||D06M15/267, D06M15/273, D06M15/29, D06M15/263|
|European Classification||D06M15/263, D06M15/273, D06M15/267, D06M15/29|