|Publication number||US3395698 A|
|Publication date||Aug 6, 1968|
|Filing date||Oct 1, 1965|
|Priority date||Oct 1, 1965|
|Publication number||US 3395698 A, US 3395698A, US-A-3395698, US3395698 A, US3395698A|
|Inventors||Laurence E Morchouse|
|Original Assignee||Mc Donnell Douglas Corp|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (61), Classifications (9)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Aug. 6, 1968 L. E. MoREHousE PHYSIOLOGICALLY PACED ERGOMETRIC SYSTEM 3 Sheets-Sheet l Filed Oct. l, 1965 PHYSIOLOGICALLY PACED ERGOMETRIC SYSTEM 5 Sheets-Sheet 2 Filed Oct. l, 1965 Aug, 6, 1968 l.. E. MoREHoUsl-z PHYSIOLOGICALLY PACED ERGOMETRIC SYSTEM 3 Sheets-Sheetl 5 Filed Oct. l, 1965 I N VENTOR MM5/01m;
United States Patent O 3,395,698 PHYSIOLOGICALLY PACED ERGOMETRIC SYSTEM Laurence E. Morehouse, Los Angeles, Calif., assignor, by
mesne assignments, to McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., a corporation of Maryland Filed Oct. 1, 1965, Ser. No. 492,033 11 Claims. (Cl. 12S-2.05)
This invention relates generally to physiological conditioning and exercising devices and systems and `more particularly to such systems in which the magntiude of physical effort input is automatically controlled by a physiological output signal from the body of the person undergoing the conditioning.
It has recently become well established that prolonged lack of physiological stressing or exercising causes serious degenerative physiological effects in the human body. These elfects include for example; deterioration of the structure, function and adaptation capability of the cardiovascular, neuro-muscular, metabolic, respiratory, and many other organic systems. Eventually the deterioration progresses to pathological states known as hypokinetic diseases. One serious example of such a disease is ischemic heart ydisease in which the heart muscle cells suffer from oxygen starvation; the heart becomes weaker, smaller and less efficient as a pump causing it to beat faster even when the body is at rest. This condition of the heart not only causes a high susceptibility to heart failure, particularly when placed under stress such as, for example, sudden exertion or emotional excitation, but, equally seriously, severly diminishes the ability of the heart to recover from heart failure or thrombosis whether caused directly by the ischemia or not. In addition the described deteriorative condition of the heart and other organs, whether or not acute, detracts severely from the individuals general physiological and mental welfare with obviously highly undesirable effects on the life, and all its physical, intellectual, and emotional products, of the individual.
The general problem has become gradually better known and understood with the development of industrialized societies in which large7 statistically observable segments of the population lead sedentary, to varying degrecs of inactivity, lives; while specific aspects of the problem have quite suddenly become critically of interest with the advent of recent experiments and proposed experiments in which the body is made inactive for prolonged periods of time while being isolated even from the stresses caused normally by the gravitational environment.
As may be inferred from the above, the present invention finds particularly useful application in the field of heart disease, its prevention and its cure; and, although in the cause of clarity and brevity of presentation, most of the following discussion and presentation of examples of the invention are directed to such applications and make use of direct signals from the heart, it is to be expressly understood that the many advantages of the invention are equally vwell manifest in the prevention and cure of other hypokinetic ydiseases and in which signals from the body utilized by this system may be other than from the heart. Such other signals for example may be chemical, electromyographic (i.e., skeletal muscle signals), thermo-electric, piezoelectric, or the like; and other diseases may be those of practically any other organ or part of the body. In addition, the inventions usefulness extends to non-human animals such as racing or working dogs or horses and porpoises.
Typical of such other parts of the body over which there has recently arisen a great ldeal of concern are the structurally rigid bones of the body which apparently suffer a severe softening, akin to dissolution, when totally inactive and when removed from stresses. Similarly skeletal 3,395,698 Patented Aug. 6, 1968 and smooth muscles may become `deteriorated due to nonstressing or injury or the like.
These effects or diseases for the most part are substantially identical to those which occur in the body during the aging process; however, although the latter natural processes apparently cannot be effectively controlled or reversed, the deteriorating effects due to inadequate exercise can be readily retarded and in most cases dramatically reversed by a proper program of physical exercise. These hypokinetic diseases and their cure are profound ramifications of the axiom that use of an organ makes it, while `disuse destroys it.
The problem of reconditioning a heart is not a simple one and must be accomplished in a manner to .rebuild the heart structure without endangering it by demanding from it a magnitude of work which will overtax it in its deconditioned state. At the same time, however, suflicient work in adequately increasing amounts must be provided or the program will be ineffective. Obviously a program proper for one individual may lbe substantially ineffective for -another and probably dangerous for yet another. In addition the sedentary patient who is concerned or frightened and may be relatively physically lazy due either to his nature or his temporary condition, requires constant motivation, in the forms of confidence regarding safe exertion of his heart and satisfaction regarding progress, in reconditioning him.
It is presently accepted that at any age all deteriorations due to lack of exercise can be arrested and in most instances the deterioration can be reversed. In a proper regimen of exercise, the heart becomes richer in oxygen, more massive and powerful, more eflicient as a pump and is able to beat more slowly and steadily under conditions of work and stress.
Increased resistance to heart ldisease as the result of reconditioning exercise may, in addition, be inferred from the epidemiological studies showing that the rate of heart attack -deaths is significantly less among physically active than among sedentary populations. The mechanism underlying this relationship may be associated with the level of serum cholesterol concentration found in `the blood of active people. Exercise reduces the serum cholesterol concentration especially when performed after meals. But probably contributing even more to heart attack resistance and particularly to recovery capability is the development of supplementary capillary blood vessels in the muscle tissues of one who has exercised strenuously. These extra vessels help to share the burden by providing -blood flow to the myocardium when a coronary artery becomes occluded. It has been discovered that when a heart is caused by volume of work output to beat at the rate of to beats per minute these extra vessels begin to develop while at the same time the heart otherwise improves its condition in the respects noted above.
Exercising devices in the prior art which have been adaptable for use by sedentary persons typically require either a constant or unknown work input. In addition the subject does not know his heartbeat rate so that in using the device it may be causing his heartbeat rate to be dangerously high or ineffectively low. Furthermore, a work output magnitude which causes the proper heartbeat rate for a particular individual on one day Imay, because of a change of conditions, be thoroughly incorrect the next day. Still 'further it must be noted that lche rate of work increase required for one subject in one period of the regimen will not be satisfactory for another person or for the same person during another portion of the program. In other words rates of recovery are highly nonlinear and different for different subjects.
Accordingly such prior art devices which require unknown or constant work inputs or which utilize a set program of increased work input suffer severe disadvantages in failing to extract from the subject the appropriate magnitude of work, which may be highly variable, required to cause the heartbeat rate, or other physiological condition, to follow a desired elevated value.
In addition to the above disadvantages and limitations of the prior art devices, it is further to be noted that the prior art devices are typically bulky, heavy, esthetically unattractive, and not readily portable and not adaptable for use in confined spaces. In addition they are generally formidably expensive for private use.
Other disadvantages of the prior art devices are that they often are not versatile to the needs of different types of subjects; and they are neither adequately reliable nor accurate. In addition, other disadvantages typically encountered in the prior art are that the device is not successfully designed for controlled use within safe limits or for ease and comfort and psychological pleasure in use. In other words, safety, personal satisfaction and incentive factors associated with the system are undesirably deticient.
It is accordingly an object of the present invention to provide an ergometric system which is not subject to these and other disadvantages and limitations in the prior art.
It is another object to provide such a system which automatically paces the work input in accordance with a physiological signal from the exercising subject and which eliminates the need for an additional operator thereby eliminating a source of possibly dangerous error in adjusting the work rate.
It is another object of the system to provide an er-gometric system which extracts ywork from the subject at any rate whether steady or fluctuating whereby the subjects heartbeat rate or other physiological conditions is caused to follow a prescribed, predetermined desired program which is intrinsically and inherently safe for the subject.
It is another object of the present invention to provide such a system which is compact and portable, versatile to different patient conditions and needs, reliable and accurate, maintenance free and rugged, esthetically attractive, and motivationally desirable with respect to ease, comfort, and pleasure in use.
It is another object to provide such an ergometric system for Calibrating persons or animals in terms of optimizing their rate of work output under certain conditions and requirements.
It is another object to provide such a system which automatically promptly shuts down when predetermined physiological signals are received from the subject.
It is another object to provide such a system in which the rate :of work output from the subject is automatically innitely, or smoothly, adjustable over a wide range of magnitude.
It is another object to provide a direct or absolute ergometric indicator of physiological work eciency.
It is another object to provide suc-h a system in which the subject need monitor no more than one simple parameter during the automatic system operation.
It is another object to provide such an ergometer system which, while being exceedingly compact, may be readily utilized to generate useful energy for use, for example, in earth isolated environments such as space capsules or interplanetary transports wherein the additional energy which may be generated for hygienic purposes may be stored for emergencies or otherwise put to use.
Very briefly, these and other objects of the present invention are achieved in one example thereof which includes a work resistance machine, or work sink, which the patient operates during the regimen of exercise. The magnitude of resistance in the work machine is electrically controlled and is determined by the electrical output signal from a heartbeat rate amplifier.
The electrical input signal to the amplifier in this example is derived from an electrical heart-rate meter, the
input termin-als of which are in turn connected to a heartrate sensing transducer physiologically coupled to the patient.
The mode of control of the mechanical resistance of the work machine component includes increasing the resistance until the patients heartbeat rate has achieved a predetermined level, and automatically varying the resistance to cause the heartbeat to maintain the desired rate. The regimen may prescribe that the heartbeat rate be maintained constant for a predetermined period and then programmed throug-h a decreasing work output to taper off the activity and gradually return the patient to his normal level of heart activity and heart excitation.
Alternately na desired heartbeat rate program for a particular patient may be set up on a programmer the output signal from which is compared at all times with the output signal rate from the sending transducer. The error signal generated from this signal of comparison is then continuously fed into the control mechanism for the variable work resistance. In this mode of control any desired program of heartbeat rate to t the needs of an individual patient may be inserted in the program; and the patient, by simply monitoring at most one simple indicator and monitoring with his physical effort a predetermined reading thereon, will automatic-ally follow the regimen prescribed for him irrespective of how complicated the work profile of the prescribed program may be and irrespective of the complex physiological effects which may be occurring in the subject. The subtle conditions and changes do not require anyones attention, yet the procedure is intrinsically safe and effective for the patient. To reiterate, the very subtle changes required to match the external work load to the physiological level of eifort are made automatically and do not demand the attention or concern of either the patient or of an observer. In his manner, both such persons can focus their attention on the patients responses to the exercise.
In a presently preferred embodiment of the invention the work sink includes a bicycle type sprocket and pedals the drive from which is coupled to the variable resistance or load therefor. The machine is equipped with a revolutions rate meter indicating revolutions per minute (r.p.m.).
In practice the only instruction to the patient is that he maintain approximately a predetermined r.p.m. rate; the work that he does is then solely a function of the magnitude of the mechanical resistance against which his pedaling effort is accomplished. The system is found to be strikingly appealing to patients. They achieve a motivationally important satisfaction when they maintain the r.p.m. meter reading at the prescribed value against the varying resistance while pedaling, particularly when they understand that the resistance torque which they feel is a measure of their otherwise invisible heartbeat rate.
Further details of this and of other examples of the invention, including highly compact and portable examples thereof, and its principles of operation will be presented below in connection with a discussion of the accompanying drawings presented by way of example only and in which:
FIGURE 1 is a block diagram illustrating the structure and operation of one example of an ergometer system constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention;
FIGURE 2 is a block diagram of an alternative example of such a system; and
FIGURE 3 is a schematic view of yet another example of an ergometric system constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
With specific reference now to the figures in more detial it is stressed that the particulars shown are by Way of example and for purposes of illustrative discussion only and are presented in the cause of providing what is believed to be the most useful and readily understood description of the principles and structural concepts ol the invention. In this regard no attempt is made to show structural details of the physiologically paced ergometric system in more detail than is necessary for a fundamental understanding of the invention, the description taken with the drawings making it apparent, to those skilled in the fields of physiological practice and research, mechanics, and electronics, how the several forms of the invention may be embodied in practice. Specifically the detailed showing is not to be taken as a limitation upon the scope of the invention which is defined by the appended claims forming, along with the drawings, a part of this specification.
In FIGURE l, a physiological source of. work and physiological source of signal representative of the rate of that work is represented by a body which may be a human body or that of an animal such as, for example, a horse, dog, or a porpoise. In a practical application of the invention the system may be utilized to regulate automatically a regimen of exercise for a human as indicated earlier, or it may be utilized for Calibrating a body source of work in terms of, for example, maximizing the practical total work output of a particular subject by optimizing the rate of work output in the terms of duration of effort. Regarding humans, for example, one subject may provide one-half horsepower for minutes to achieve his maximum safe work output for a day, while another subject maximizes his output by working at the rate of one-fourth H.P. for two hours. Such a calibration and rating for a person is of value in preparing for emergencies wherein additional energy may be needed, as for example, to complete a space mission. Other such human applications include aiding athletes in selecting sports for which they are best suited and on conventional military, research, or mountain climbing expeditions wherein such calibration studies aid in determining the optimum between maximizing the duration of the mission and minimizing the food supply and consequent weight of pack.
Regarding animals, it may be noted that the selection of the particular type of race or work best suited for particular animals can be most advantageously made if the optimum amount of work for the animal is known. Furthermore one of the goals of current sea laboratory work is to determine to what extent and for what durations of time sea animals can be used for useful work.
A transducer 12 is coupled to the body it) and may be of the well known electrocardiogram electrode type for providing an electrical output signal representative of the heartbeat and the heartbeat characteristics of the subject. For many purposes of analysis and observation the remainder of a conventional electrocardiogram strip chart recorder 14 may be coupled to an output channel of the transducer 12. The recorder 14 may be used continuously; however, typically it has been found adequate for the recorder to be used primarily for sampling and spot analysis of the output of the transducer 12.
The input portions of the electrocardiogram, i.e., the non-recording portions thereof are, in this example, connected to a danger discriminator network 16 which may, when desired, continually monitor the heartbeat wave form in a manner to monitor electronically the output of the transducer 12 t0 watch for danger signals caused from, for example, over-exertion without continuously operating the electrocardiogram strip chart recorder as a whole. The operation of the danger discriminator network in this regard is to provide a system shutdown signal, when, for example, the s-t portion of the electrocardiograph drops below a certain predetermined level or when the q-r portion of the wave form manifests an undesired characteristic.
Similarly a temperature sensor 18 may be coupled thermally to the source 10 to provide a different type of physiologically actuated system shutdown signal. In this mode of control when the body temperature passes a certain predetermined level thereby presaging heat exhaustion the electro output signal of the sensor 18 is operated upon by the danger discriminator network 16 to form the desired shutdown signal. Still a further sensor which has been utilized is a chemical transducer 20 which is chemically coupled to the body 10 as by a probe insertion into the bloodstream thereof in a manner, for example, to monitor the blood lactic acid content whereby, when the latter reaches a predetemned undesirable level, the danger discriminator network again functions to create a system shutdown signal.
Utilized typically for purposes of continuous monitoring of the electrical output signal of the transducer 12 is a tape recorder 22 and a heartbeat triggered oscillograph 24. The tape recorder provides a permanent record which may be analyzed or observed when desired and may be utilized for later comparison with other like records. The oscillograph 24 provides a continuous, real time, graph of the heartbeat wave form from the body 10. When desired, motion or still photographs may be made of the scope presentation of the oscillograph 24 as for use in detailed analysis or later comparison work.
Further, in this example, discriminator network 26 is coupled to an open output terminal of the transducer 12 for purposes of operating on the heartbeat wave train signals from the tranducer 12 to prepore them 4for conversion by an integrator amplifier 28 into an analog voltage signal, the instantaneous amplitude of which is proportional to the frequency of the heartbeat rate. The filterdiscriminator network 26 may be `of substantially conventional design of the character to reject spurious signals outputted by the transducer 12. These 'rejected signals may, for example, comprise spurious heartbeats or electromyogram signals from the skeletal or smooth muscles. The network 26 also operates on the wave train signals to reinsert therein a synthesized heartbeat signal when the subjects heart has skipped a Ibeat or when for other reasons the transducer 12 has failed to output the typical signal.
The integrator amplifier 28 is in effect a converter which operates in cooperation with the discriminator portions of the network 26 to convert the frequency of the heartbeat signals into the voltage analog as mentioned above. 'Ihe 4output terminal lof the amplifier 28 may be coupled to a heartbeat rate meter 30 so that, when desired, the heartbeat rate may be visually monitored by either a trained observer or the subject himself.
The output terminal of the amplifier 28 is also coupled to an input terminal of the comparator network such as, in this example, a subtractor circuit 32. Another, parallel, input terminal to the subtractor circuit 32 `is connected to the output terminal of a programmer 34.
The programmer 34 in this example provides an analog output signal which is like that which is desired to be outputted from the body 10 after proper operation thereon by the transducer 12, the filter discriminator network 26, and Iintegrator amplifier 28. In other words, the output of the programmer 34 is representative of the ideal or prescribed output from ythe body 10. This signal is then compared in the subtractor circuit 32 with the output signal from the integrato-r amplifier 28 and the lresulting Ianalog error signal is coupled through an amplifier 36 to the control mechanism 40 for the variable work load device 42. The work load device 42 may be, in this example, a stationary bicycle type ergometer the resistance to the pedaling of ywhich may be varied by hysteresis or eddy current clutch type means, by lhydraulic controls, 'by mechanical friction, by varying the field current in an electrical generator the armature of which is rotated by the patient, or the like. Alternatively, the work device may be a treadmill whose resistance and/ or inclination angle is variedI It is to be note-d, however, that Iin any case, the subject is required to observe, and 'obey, `only one simple parameter such as, for example, r.p.rn. of the pedaling or the lineal velocity of the treadmill; the system automatically, then, controls the prescribed magnitude of effort to be outputted by the patient at every instant of time during the duration of the exercise regimen.
When the signal from the programmer 34 substantially matches that from the integrator amplifier 28 the resultant error signal at the output terminal of the subtractor circuit 32 is zero, whereby the resistance control mechanism 40 is not changed to alter the magnitude of resistance associated with the variable Work load 42. When however the signal output of the integrator amplier 28 is, for example, less than the output signal from the programmer 34 yat a particular instant of time, indicating that the heartbeat rate and therefore the etort being expended by the body is less than the prescribed Value for that moment, the error signal developed at the subtract-or circuit 32 has a magnitude and polarity to cause the resistance control mechanism to adjust the resistance associated with the variable work load 42 whereby to increase the resistance felt by the body 1t) which is drivingly coupled thereto through the mechanical connection indicated by the line 44 as shown. This mechanical connection may of course be simply the placement of the patients feet upon the pedals of a bicycle type ergometer, or other like harnessing connection.
Conversely from the example set forth below, when the output signal from the integrator amplifier 28 is greater at a particular instant of time than that from the programmer 34 thereby indicating that the subject is exerting more than the desired rate of work, the output signal from the subtractor circuit 32 is of the opposite polarity and of a magnitude to cause a resistance control meohanism 40 t-o adjust the variable work load 42 whereby the body 10 performs a lesser rate of work.
The programmer 34 may provide its prescribed output signal in response to an interval timer and an adjustment for a desired, for example, 150 pulses per minute, heartbeat rate analog signal. Alternatively the input for the programmer may be a card with a prescribed pre-punched program thereon or a magnetic tape instruction record or the like. When the desired duration of the program is indicated, a stop signal may be sent along a signal lead 45 directly to the resistance control mechanism 40, lthereby to decrease gradually, or abruptly, the amount of resistance associated with the variable work load 42.
As mentioned above, the system may include a number of physiologically activated, cut oit signal capabilities which cause the out-put signal from the danger discriminator network 16 to be fed to the resistance control mechanism 40 thereby to shut down the magnitude of resistance associated therewith. In addition, however, a trained observer who may be present in certain situations, such as for example, when an injured patient or a space traveller is being systematically reconditioned in a critical regimen of exercise; and the observer may determine from the oscillograph 24 lor from observations and conversations with the subject that the exercise should be terminated. In such -a case, the observer may institute an abrupt or programmed stop sequence by pressing a button on the stop and restart control network 46. Similarly when the exercise program is `to be resumed a restart control button may be pressed to cause the programmer 34 to begin its programmed analog anew.
It is often desirable to observer at any given point in time the rate of work being accomplished by the body 10. To this end a work rate meter 48 may be connected to the variable work load 42. Similarly a `total work indicator S0 which integrates the work rate of the meter 48 iS connected, as shown, to the variable work load 42.
Referring to FIGURE 2, an example of the invention is illustrated in which a pair of working bodies 52, 54 are mechanically coupled to respective electrical generators 56, 58. In this embodiment of the invention it is presumed that it is desirable not only to provide a prescribed regimen of exercise for the working bodies 52, 54 but also to accumulate and utilize the energy produced by the prescribed exercise in an energy storage or utilization Cil device 60, which is coupled to both of the electrical generators 56, 58. It is further presumed in this example that the working bodies 52, 54 have each been calibrated as discussed above so that the prescribed regimen of exercise is constructively proper for each of the bodies and whereby the energy accumulated or utilized from each of the working bodies is maximized by virtue of the same prescribed program.
As in the example, of the previous figure, each of the bodies 52, 54 is coupled respectively to a sensor transducer 62, 64 which is, in turn, coupled through a filterdiscriminator network 66, 68 and anintegrating ampliiier circuit 70, 72 respectively. Again, a heartbeat rate meter 74, 76 may be coupled to an output terminal of the ampliliers 70, 72, respectively, for the purposes of observing, when desired, the instantaneous status of the heartbeat rate of each of the working bodies 52, 54.
Each one of a pair of programmers 7S, 30, functioning independently from the other, and with a particular program inserted therein, prescribed for its respective working body, is coupled to one of the comparing input terminals of a substractor 82, 84, while the other comparing input terminal is connected to a respective one of the programmers 73, Sti. T he error signal from each of these subtractor circuits 82, 84 is fed to a eld current control network 86, 88 connected respectively to the generators 56, 58 for purposes of varying the amount of resistance to armature rotation thereof and electrical current output therefrom which is fed to the energy storage or utilization device 60. The status of the device 60 which may be indicated by an indicator 90 may be fed by means of, for example, an electrical analog signal along the conductor 92 -to each of the programmers 78, 80, for the purposes of, for example, shutting down the system when the energy storage has achieved a desired level in the device 60.
In FIGURE 3, an example of the invention is illustrated schematically which is particularly advantageous in use as a compact ergometric system which is portable, which may be readily and conveniently used by a desk worker, or which may be used by persons in conned quarters such as, for example, submarines, sea laboratory capsules, or space capsules.
This embodiment of the invention comprises a compact, aesthetically attractive foot pedal console which contains a pair of reciprocatable pedals 102, 104 which are connected to opposite sides of a sprocket 106 as ndicated by the dashed lines 108 through a pair of reciprocating connecting rods 110. The sprocket 106 has an axis of rotation, normal to the plane of the drawing, indicated at 112, and is rotationally coaxially connected to a drive gear 114. The drive gear 114 is in turn mechanically rotationally coupled to a variable resistance load mechanism 116, the degree of resistance of which is adjustable by the setting of a control 118. Thus, reciprocating action of the pedals 102, 104 through the connecting rods causes a work input to the variable resistance load mechanism 116. The magnitude of the resistance associated with the mechanism 116 may Ibe constant for a particular regimen of exercise and be set in advance for a particular patient by positioning of the control 118 by an expert observer or doctor.
Also coupled mechanically to the console 100 is the physiological source of energy 120 which again is presumably the human for whom the regimen of exercise has been prescribed. A transducer sensor 122 is also coupled to the source 120 and provides an electrical output signal which is converted by a heart rate meter 124 into an analog electrical signal which is proportional to the heartbeat rate of the patient. The heartbeat rate meter 124 is electrically coupled to a metronome 126 the frequency of which is electrically controlled thereby and which is of the character including a pair of alternately [lashing lights 128, 130. The frequency of the flashing lights 128, constitutes un instruction signal to the patient giving him a cadence for the actuation of the pedals 102, 104. When the heartbeat rate is low the metronome signals are of a relatively higher frequency; when on the other hand the heartbeat rate is high, the metronome flashing is caused to be slower thereby in either event the work outputted by the source 120 through the sprocket 106 is automatically controlled to be that which provides the prescribed heartbeat rate.
The duration of the regimen of exercise is also prescribed fo-r the individual in accordance with his particular program of conditioning or reconditioning; and to this end a timer device 132 is included in the desk top console, indicated by the bracket 134.
There have thus been disclosed and discussed a number of examples of a physiologically paced ergometric system which achieves the objects and exhibits the advantages set forth hereinabove.
What is claimed is:
1. Automatic physiologically paced ergometric system comprising:
sensor transducer means of the character adapted to be coupled to a physiological source of work and source of physiological signal representative of the magnitude of such work at a given point in time for providing an electrical output signal responsive to and representative of physiological effort associated with said source of work;
electrical means coupled to said transducer means for generating an analog signal representative of the status of a predetermined physiological criterion associated with said source; programmer means for -generating an electrical analog signal representative of a program of desired status of said predetermined physiological criterion;
comparator means having input terminals coupled to said electrical means and to said programmer means for generating an error signal representative of distinctions between the said analog signals; and
variable work load means adapted to be mechanically coupled to said source of physiological work and having an electrically actuated control means for regulating the amount of work inputted to said load means, said control means being coupled to said comparator means.
2. Automatic physiologically paced ergometric system comprising:
sensor transducer means of the character adapted to be coupled to a physiological source of work and source of physiological signal representative of the magnitude of such work at a given point in time for providing an electrical output signal responsive to and representative of physiological etfort associated with said source of work;
heartbeat tachometer means coupled to said transducer means for -generating an electrical analog signal representative of the heartbeat rate associated with said source;
programmer means for -generating an electrical analog signal representative of a predetermined program of said heartbeat rate versus time;
comparator means having input terminals coupled to said tachometer and to said programmer means for generating an error signal representative of voltage distinctions between said analog signals; and variable work load means adapted to be mechanically coupled to source of physiological work and having an electrically actuated control means for regulating the amount of work inputted to said load means, said control means having an input terminal coupled to said comparator means whereby said error signal is impressed upon said input terminal of said control means. 3. The invention according to claim 2 in which said heartbeat tachometer means includes filter-discriminator network means coupled to said transducer means for rejecting spurious heartbeat signals.
4. The invention according to claim 3 which further includes integrator-amplifier means coupled to said lterdiscriminator network means for generating said electrical analog signal representative of said heartbeat rate.
5. The invention according to claim 4 in which said comparator means includes a subtractor network for generating said error signal representative of the dilerence between said analog signals.
6. The invention according to claim S which further includes an electrocardiogram type strip chart recorder means coupled to said transducer means.
7. The invention according to claim 6 which further includes a danger discriminator network intercoupled between said control means for said variable work load means and said strip chart recorder means for detecting danger indication characteristics in the heartbeat signals and for generating an override, system shut down signal to said control means in response thereto.
8. Automatic physiologically paced ergometric system comprising:
sensor transducer means of the character adapted to be coupled to a physiological source of work and source of physiological signal representative of the magnitude of such work at a given point in time for providing an electrical output signal responsive to and representative of physiological eifort associated with said source of work; electrical means coupled to said transducer means for generating an analog signal representative of the difference between the status of a predetermined physiological criterion associated with said source and a desired extraordinary status of said criterion;
adjustable pacer means coupled to said electrical means for generating an instructional signal, readable by said source representative of said difference analog signal; and
work load means adapted to be mechanically coupled to said source of physiological work.
9. The invention according to claim 8 in which said electrical means includes a heatbeat rate meter and in which said pacer means comprises flashing metronome means whose frequency of flashing is controlled by said analog signal.
10. The invention according to claim 8 in which said work load means comprises a compact housing positionable within a conventional desk knee well and further including a pair of foot operated reciprocatable resistance pedals carried by said housing.
11. The invention according to claim 10 which further includes adjustable resistance means coupled to said reciprocatable pedals.
References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,848,992 8/1958 Pigeon 12S-2.05 3,285,070 1l/l966 McDonough 73-379 RICHARD A. GAUDET, Primary Examiner.
SIMON BRODER, Assistant Examiner.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2848992 *||Aug 30, 1955||Aug 26, 1958||Gerard Pigeon||Apparatus for controlling the pulse|
|US3285070 *||Jun 26, 1963||Nov 15, 1966||Elgin Elmac Entpr Inc||Muscular evaluation and exercising apparatus|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3518985 *||Feb 15, 1968||Jul 7, 1970||Quinton Wayne E||Control system for an exercise machine using patient's heart rate and heart rate acceleration|
|US3556083 *||May 2, 1968||Jan 19, 1971||Beckman Instruments Inc||Apparatus for measurement of electrodermal phenomena|
|US3643943 *||Jul 28, 1969||Feb 22, 1972||Curtis L Erwin Jr||Exerciser with work-indicating mechanism|
|US3675640 *||Apr 9, 1970||Jul 11, 1972||Gatts J D||Method and apparatus for dynamic health testing evaluation and treatment|
|US3693614 *||May 28, 1971||Sep 26, 1972||Schon Kenneth A||Exercise apparatus and method for paralytic patients|
|US3702113 *||Aug 20, 1969||Nov 7, 1972||Blockley Walter Vincent||Electrode apparatus for exerciser handlebar|
|US3705721 *||Nov 5, 1969||Dec 12, 1972||American Gage And Machine Co||Constant input energy absorbing apparatus|
|US3765245 *||Dec 31, 1970||Oct 16, 1973||Jaeger E||Dynamo ergometer|
|US3767195 *||Mar 3, 1969||Oct 23, 1973||Lifecycle Inc||Programmed bicycle exerciser|
|US3784194 *||Apr 20, 1972||Jan 8, 1974||J Perrine||Bilateral reciprocal isokinetic exerciser|
|US3802698 *||Feb 21, 1973||Apr 9, 1974||Exercycle Corp||Exercise control system|
|US3826491 *||Jun 18, 1973||Jul 30, 1974||Del Mar Eng Lab||Exercise treadmill|
|US3845756 *||Jun 28, 1972||Nov 5, 1974||Siemens Ag||Ergometer device|
|US3848467 *||Jul 10, 1972||Nov 19, 1974||E Flavell||Proportioned resistance exercise servo system|
|US3869121 *||Jul 5, 1973||Mar 4, 1975||Evan R Flavell||Proportioned resistance exercise servo system|
|US3902480 *||Dec 2, 1974||Sep 2, 1975||Robert J Wilson||Electro-mechanical isotonic or isokinetic exercising system|
|US4084810 *||Jul 26, 1974||Apr 18, 1978||Lars Osten Forsman||Energy absorbing unit for physical exercising devices|
|US4184678 *||Jun 21, 1977||Jan 22, 1980||Isokinetics, Inc.||Programmable acceleration exerciser|
|US4235437 *||Jul 3, 1978||Nov 25, 1980||Book Wayne J||Robotic exercise machine and method|
|US4276887 *||Jan 14, 1980||Jul 7, 1981||World Medical Marketing Corporation||Foot exerciser|
|US4280486 *||Oct 29, 1979||Jul 28, 1981||World Medical Marketing Corporation||Foot exerciser|
|US4299206 *||Jan 14, 1980||Nov 10, 1981||World Medical Marketing Corporation||Foot exerciser|
|US4312358 *||Jul 23, 1979||Jan 26, 1982||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Instrument for measuring and computing heart beat, body temperature and other physiological and exercise-related parameters|
|US4323237 *||Aug 30, 1979||Apr 6, 1982||Coats And Clark, Inc.||Adaptive exercise apparatus|
|US4354676 *||Oct 13, 1978||Oct 19, 1982||Pepsico, Inc.||Exerciser|
|US4358105 *||Aug 21, 1980||Nov 9, 1982||Lifecycle, Inc.||Programmed exerciser apparatus and method|
|US4367752 *||Apr 30, 1980||Jan 11, 1983||Biotechnology, Inc.||Apparatus for testing physical condition of a subject|
|US4409992 *||Oct 16, 1980||Oct 18, 1983||Sidorenko Georgy I||Electronic ergometer|
|US4454885 *||Jun 22, 1981||Jun 19, 1984||Henry Ford Hospital||Assessing arterial systems|
|US4499900 *||Nov 26, 1982||Feb 19, 1985||Wright State University||System and method for treating paralyzed persons|
|US4579335 *||Feb 13, 1984||Apr 1, 1986||Rocco Centafanti||Method of and apparatus for use in exercising and in competition|
|US4632123 *||May 10, 1984||Dec 30, 1986||Baird Corporation||Radioactivity detection system|
|US4683891 *||Feb 11, 1985||Aug 4, 1987||Vincent Cornellier||Biomonitoring stress management method and device|
|US4732038 *||Jul 11, 1986||Mar 22, 1988||Delgiorno Daniel||Muscle testing method|
|US4765613 *||Jan 22, 1987||Aug 23, 1988||Paramount Fitness Equipment Corporation||Progressive resistance exercise device|
|US4805455 *||Apr 24, 1987||Feb 21, 1989||Myo-Tech Corp.||Muscle testing apparatus and method|
|US4819485 *||May 30, 1986||Apr 11, 1989||Myo-Tech Corp.||Muscle testing apparatus|
|US4828257 *||Feb 3, 1988||May 9, 1989||Powercise International Corporation||Electronically controlled exercise system|
|US4846466 *||Nov 20, 1987||Jul 11, 1989||Stima Iii Michael W||Microprocessor controlled electro-hydraulic exercise system|
|US4860763 *||Jul 29, 1987||Aug 29, 1989||Schminke Kevin L||Cardiovascular conditioning and therapeutic system|
|US4930770 *||Dec 1, 1988||Jun 5, 1990||Baker Norman A||Eccentrically loaded computerized positive/negative exercise machine|
|US5205801 *||Mar 29, 1990||Apr 27, 1993||The Scott Fetzer Company||Exercise system|
|US5256115 *||Mar 25, 1991||Oct 26, 1993||William G. Scholder||Electronic flywheel and clutch for exercise apparatus|
|US5297557 *||Oct 14, 1992||Mar 29, 1994||Del Mar Avionics||Stress test system with bidirectional filter|
|US5318487 *||May 12, 1992||Jun 7, 1994||Life Fitness||Exercise system and method for managing physiological intensity of exercise|
|US5527239 *||Feb 4, 1993||Jun 18, 1996||Abbondanza; James M.||Pulse rate controlled exercise system|
|US5571063 *||Sep 26, 1995||Nov 5, 1996||Ivanov; Yakov||Cycloergometer for improved function of impaired heart|
|US6115629 *||Mar 1, 1999||Sep 5, 2000||Digital Concepts Of Missouri, Inc.||Two electrode heart rate monitor measuring power spectrum for use with exercise equipment|
|US6430436||Sep 1, 2000||Aug 6, 2002||Digital Concepts Of Missouri, Inc.||Two electrode heart rate monitor measuring power spectrum for use on road bikes|
|US8503086||Aug 16, 2010||Aug 6, 2013||Impulse Technology Ltd.||System and method for tracking and assessing movement skills in multidimensional space|
|US8861091||Aug 6, 2013||Oct 14, 2014||Impulse Technology Ltd.||System and method for tracking and assessing movement skills in multidimensional space|
|US20080051261 *||Aug 14, 2007||Feb 28, 2008||Lewis Charles A||Exercise protocols for treadmills and bicycle ergometers for exercise, diagnostics and rehabilitation|
|US20090108082 *||Oct 31, 2007||Apr 30, 2009||Richard Goldmann||Programmatic climate control of an exercise environment|
|US20100302142 *||Dec 2, 2010||French Barry J||System and method for tracking and assessing movement skills in multidimensional space|
|US20130065730 *||Jan 7, 2011||Mar 14, 2013||Antonio Camerota||Machine for the power exercise of a user|
|EP0028209A1 *||Oct 13, 1980||May 6, 1981||Emil Frank Smidak||A device designed to stimulate exercise by the individual|
|EP0569879A2 *||May 7, 1993||Nov 18, 1993||Life Fitness||Exercise system and method for managing physiological intensity of exercise|
|EP1029506A2||May 7, 1993||Aug 23, 2000||Life Fitness||Exercise apparatus|
|EP1029507A2||May 7, 1993||Aug 23, 2000||Life Fitness||Exercie apparatus for maintaining a user's level of exercise|
|WO1980000124A1 *||Dec 12, 1978||Feb 7, 1980||R Polhemus||Feedback controlled exercise machine|
|WO2009023661A1 *||Aug 12, 2008||Feb 19, 2009||Mergenet Medical, Inc.||Exercise protocols for treadmills and bicycle ergometers for exercise, diagnostics and rehabilitation|
|U.S. Classification||600/520, 128/905, 600/523, 73/379.7, 482/3|
|Cooperative Classification||A61B5/222, Y10S128/905|