|Publication number||US3415737 A|
|Publication date||Dec 10, 1968|
|Filing date||May 19, 1967|
|Priority date||Jun 24, 1966|
|Also published as||CA1014137A, CA1014137A1, DE1645715B1|
|Publication number||US 3415737 A, US 3415737A, US-A-3415737, US3415737 A, US3415737A|
|Inventors||Harris E Kluksdahl|
|Original Assignee||Chevron Res|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (10), Referenced by (115), Classifications (18)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
10, 1968 H. E. KLUKSDAHL 3,415,737
I REFORMING A SULFUR'FREE NAPHTHA WITH A PLATINUM'RHENIUM CATALYST Filed May 19. 1967 2 V m 1020 PLATINUM -CATALYST Z, 1000- .J
960 LU u g PLVATINUM-RHENIUM u CATALYST l I o 100 200 300 HOURS ON STREAM FIGJ as P o PLATINUM-RHENIUM Z, CATALYST as o o v E 80 PLATINUM CATALYST Q 3 7a Q .J 76
n U l l HOURS ON STREAM FIG.2
INVENTOR Ail 471M ATTOYRNEYS United States Patent 3,415,737 REFORMING A SULFUR-FREE NAPHTHA WITH A PLATINUM-RHENIUM CATALYST Harris E. Kluksdahl, San Rafael, Califi, assignor to Chevron Research Company, San Francisco, Calif., a corporation of Delaware Continuation-impart of application Ser. No. 560,166, June 24, 1966. This application May 19, 1967, 501'. No. 639,719
7 Claims. (Cl. 208-139) ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE Reforming a sulfur-free naphtha in the presence of hydrogen with a catalyst composition of a porous solid catalyst support and 0.1 to 3 weight percent platinum and 0.01 to 5 weight percent rhenium, and the novel supported platinum-rhenium catalyst.
Cross-reference This application is a continuation-impart of application Ser. No. 560,166, filed June 24, 1966 now abandoned.
This invention relates to hydrocarbon reforming processes, and more particularly to a novel catalytic composition and to a process for reforming of a naphtha fraction in the presence of the novel catalyst. The new catalyst comprises platinum and rhenium supported on a porous solid carrier.
Prior art Catalytic reforming is well known in the petroleum industry and refers to the treatment of naphtha fractions to improve the octane rating. The more important hydrocarbon reactions occurring during reforming operation employing catalysts comprising dehydrogenation-promoting metal components include dehydrogenation of naphthenes to aromatics, dehydrocyclization of normal p-araffins to naphthenes and aromatics, isomerization of normal paraflins to isoparaffins, and hydrocracking of relatively longchained parafiins. Hydrocracking reactions which produce high yields of light gaseous hydrocarbons, e.g., methane and ethane, are to be particularly avoided during reforming as this decreases the yield of gasoline boiling products. Furthermore, since hydrocracking is an exothermic process, as contrasted to reforming which, in general, is endothermic, hydrocracking reactions which result in the production of high yields of light gaseous products are generally accompanied by severe temperature excursions which can result in temperature runaways in a reforming operation.
Because of the demand for high octane gasoline for use as motor fuels, etc., extensive research is being devoted to the development of improved reforming catalysts and catalyticreforming processes. Catalysts for successful reforming processes must possess good selectivity, i.e., be able to produce high yields of high octane number gasoline products and accordingly, low yields of light gaseous hydrocarbons or carbonaceous by-products. In general, high octane number gasoline products can be obtained from a given feed by using more severe conditions of high temperature or low space velocity; however, the gasoline yield generally suffers accordingly as the octane number of the product is increased. Catalysts are thus often rated on the yield-octane number selectivity; i.e., compared on the basis of gasoline yield obtainable at the desired product octane number. The catalysts should also possess good activity in order that the temperature required to produce a certain quality product need not be too high. Apart from good selectivity and activity, it is also necessary that catalysts possess good stability in order that the activity and selectivity characteristics can be retained during prolonged periods of operation.
Catalysts comprising platinum, for example, platinum supported on alumina, are well known and widely used for reforming of naphthas and gasoline boiling range materials in order to produce high octane number gasolines. Platinum catalysts are highly selective toward the production of high octane aromatics and highly active for the several reactions that occur during reforming. However, platinum catalysts are also very expensive because of the high cost of platinum and will probably become even more expensive as a result of the restricted availability of the metal. These economic factors have led the petroleum industry to seek less expensive substitutes for platinum and to investigate catalytic promoters to use with the platinum catalysts to increase their activity, stability, and in particular the gasoline yield-octane number selectivity, thereby making platinum catalysts more economical for reforming operations.
Rhenium has been proposed in the prior art for use in catalytic reforming as a substitute for more common catalytic components such as platinum. However, rhenium has been found to be extremely poor for reforming. Thus, rhenium alone supported on charcoal or alumina was found to possess only limited reforming activity and to require excessively large concentrationsof the metal, above 5 weight percent, to obtain good activity. Rhenium has also been suggested for use with palladium for reforming; thus a catalyst comprising palladium and rhenium impregnated on alumina, which catalyst was presulfided, was shown to have better initial reforming activity than a presulfided palladium-alumina catalyst when used to reform a sulfur-containing naphtha. However, the activity of the palladium-rhenium presulfided catalyst decreased significantly after only limited use.
I prepared a catalyst comprising platinum and rhenium composited with alumina, but when tested for the reforming of a naphtha fraction, the catalyst caused excessive hydrocracking. The production of large amounts of light gases, such as methane and ethane, was significantly higher than the production of light gases with a catalyst comprising platinum alone on alumina. In other words, the platinum-rhenium catalytic composition was found to be less selective for the production of high octane gasoline products than a platinum-alumina catalyst. Also, upon introduction of the naphtha fraction to the reaction zone, a severe exotherm was observed in the catalyst bed. I also prepared a catalyst comprising platinum and rhenium on alumina, sulfided said catalyst, and tested it for the reforming of a sulfur-containing feed. The catalyst exhibited poor selectivity and activity. The yield of high octane products was low, thus making the reforming process unattractive economically. Thus, although rhenium has been suggested for use with noble metals such as palladium, it was found that such combination was not satisfactory under the above conditions.
It came as a surprising discovery that when certain conditions of operations are followed and/or the catalyst subjected to certain pretreatments, a catalyst comprising platinum and rhenium supported on alumina possesses high activity, and, particularly, good selectivity and stability, for the reforming of sulfur-free feeds. It Was especially unexpected to find that a supported platinumrhenium catalyst would initially show undesirable hydrocracking, and then after reforming is continued the hydrocracking becomes negligible. In fact after the initial period the catalyst comprising platinum and rhenium on alumina is so far superior to a catalyst comprising platinum alone on alumina that the initial poor reforming, which results in the production of high yields of light gaseous hydrocarbons, can be tolerated for the time needed to reduce the excessive hydrocracking activity of the catalyst. It is possible to get longer run lengths with higher yields of high octane products with the platinum-rhenium supported catalyst than with a platinum catalyst without rhenium.
Summary of the invention In accordance with the present invention an improved reforming process can be conducted in the presence of catalysts comprising platinum and rhenium incorporated on or in porous solid carriers. Rhenium in small concentrations, less than about weight percent, is effective as a promoter for platinum reforming catalysts, measurably lowering the yield decline rate, i.e., increasing the stability of the catalyst, when sulfur is excluded from the feedstock. Thus, in accordance with the present invention reforming of a fulfur-free naphtha fraction is accomplished by contacting said fraction at reforming conditions and in the presence of hydrogen with a catalyst comprising a porous solid catalyst support having disposed thereon in intimate admixture 0.01 to 3 weight percent platinum and 0.01 to 5 weight percent rhenium.
Also, in accordance with the present invention, a novel catalytic composition of matter has been discovered comprising a porous solid catalyst carrier having disposed thereon in intimate admixture 0.01 to 3 Weight percent platinum and 0.01 to 5 weight percent rhenium. The novel catalyst of the present invention is found to be highly active and stable for the reforming of naphtha and gasoline boiling-range hydrocarbons, and, in fact, is superior to commercial reforming catalysts containing platinum but no rhenium.
Brief description of the drawings The present invention may be better understood and will be further explained hereinafter with reference to the graphs in FIGURES 1 and 2, which show, for comparison purposes, data from simulated life tests indicating the reforming activity and stability of a conventional catalyst comprising platinum on an alumina support, and a catalyst comprising latinum and rhenium on an alumina support. The conditions of operation were more severe than normally used in a reforming operation in order to simulate the response of the catalysts to much longer tests (life tests). The graph in FIGURE 1 shows the average catalyst temperatures as a function of length of test or hours onsteam required to maintain a IOU-octane (F-l clear) product for each of the two catalysts. The graph in FIG- URE 2 shows as a function of the time on-stream, the yield of C liquid product, or gasoline having a 100- octane rating produced during reforming with each of the two catalysts. From FIGURE 2 it is seen that the process using the platinum-rhenium catalyst yields significantly higher amounts of lOO-octane gasoline product than the process using the platinum catalyst. The catalyst temperatures and C liquid product volume percents used to make the comparisons in the graphs were obtained only after the hydrocracking activity of the platinumrhenium catalyst had subsided to that of the platinum catalyst. Thus, the catalysts had been on-stream for several hours before making the comparison shown in the graphs of FIGURES 1 and 2.
Theory of the invention It is not fully understood Why rhenium promotes platinum-containing catalysts for the reforming of naphtha. While not intending to limit the scope of the present invention or be bound by any theoretical explanation, there is evidence indicating that rhenium forms an alloy with the platinum and that this alloy may, in part, be responsible for the improved performance of the platinumrhenium catalyst over a conventional platinum catalyst.
X-ray and electron diffraction studies of the metallic phases present in catalysts comprising various concentrations of platinum and rhenium supported on alumina indicate platinum-rhenium phase changes remarkably similar to that observed in bulk platinum-rhenium alloy systems, i.e., systems with no support present. Thus, reference to a phase diagram of the bulk platinum-rhenium alloy system [see, for example, Hansen, M., and Anderko, K., Constitution of Binary Alloys, McGraw-Hill (1958)] shows that for concentrations of rhenium from 0 to about 40 atomic Weight percent and at temperatures below at least 1750 C., only one platinum-rhenium phase exists, that of the face center cubic (f.c.c.) crystal structure for platinum. Above 40 atomic percent rhenium, the hexagonal close pack (h.c.p.) structure of rhenium can also be observed. Studies conducted with samples of catalysts comprising platinum alone on alumina, rhenium alone on alumina, and various concentrations of platinum and rhenium on alumina showed that for concentrations of rhenium on the catalyst of less than about 50 atomic weight percent, the h.c.p. rhenium structure was not present, or, at least, could not be detected; only the f.c.c. platinum structure existed. At higher concentrations of rhenium on the catalyst, i.e. above about 50 atomic weight percent rhenium, the h.c.p. rhenium structure could be observed. The platinum-rhenium catalyst samples used to investigate the crystal structure of the metals were prepared by heating the catalysts to elevated temperatures, for example 850 C., in either wet or dry hydrogen to reduce the metals to the metallic state.
It is also known from studies with bulk platinumrhenium systems that the addition of rhenium to platinum decreases the lattice spacing of the f.c.c. platinum unit cell. The decrease in lattice spacing as rhenium is added to platinum under conditions to form an alloy can be observed from the increase in the angle of diffraction, 20, using CllKoz radiation, from the (311) plane of the f.c.c. platinum structure. Increasing the rhenium concentration in platinum-alumina catalysts also produces an increase in the diffraction angle, 20 from the (311) plane of the f.c.c. platinum structure. The addition of rhenium to the platinum-rhenium catalyst causes a large enough shift with the expected direction in magnitude in the ditfraction angle, 20, to strongly indicate formation of an alloy.
Additional evidence favoring the theory of alloy formation for platinum-rhenium supported catalysts is the observation that the size of the f.c.c. platinum particles decreases as rhenium is added to platinum-alumina catalysts. The f.c.c. platinum particle size, as determined by electron diffraction investigations of catalyst samples reduced in hydrogen at a constant temperature, decreases as rhenium is added until about the equiatomic platinum-rhenium composition is reached. The metal particle size is related to how easily the metal sinters; i.e., the smaller the particles, the less the metals have sintered. This ease in sintering is in turn related to the melting point of the metals; i.e., the higher the melting point of the metals, the more ditficult it is for sintering to occur. Thus, the decrease in size of the f.c.c. particles as rhenium is added to platinumalumina catalysts is believed to be due to the increase in melting point of the alloy formed. This observation is consistent with the chemistry of bulk platinum-rhenium alloy systems which show that the addition of rhenium to platinum increases the melting point of the f.c.c. crystals.
Description of the invention The porous solid carrier or support which is employed in the preparation of the platinum-rhenium catalyst of the present invention can include a large number of materials upon which the catalytically active amounts of platinum and rhenium can be disposed. The porous solid carrier can be, for example, silicon carbine, charcoal, or carbon. Preferably, the porous solid carrier is an inorganic oxide. A high surface area inorganic oxide carrier is particularly preferred, e.g., an inorganic oxide having a surface area of 50-700 m. gm. The carrier can be a natural or a synthetically produced inorganic oxide or combination of inorganic oxides. Typical acidic inorganic oxide supports which can be used are the naturally occurring aluminum silicates, particularly when acide treated to increase the activity, and the synthetically-produced cracking supports, such as silica-alumina, silica-zirconia, silicaalumina-zirconia, silica-magnesia, silica-alumina-magnesia, and crystalline zeolitic aluminosilicates. Generally, however, reforming processes are preferably conducted in the presence of catalysts having low cracking activity, i.e., catalysts of limited acidity. Hence, preferred carriers are inorganic oxides such as magnesia and alumina.
A particularly preferred catalytic carrier for purposes of this invention is alumina. Any of the forms of alumina suitable as a support for reforming catalysts can be used. Furthermore, alumina can be prepared by a variety of methods satisfactory for the purposes of this invention. The preparation of alumina for use in reforming catalysts is Well known in the prior art.
The novel reforming catalyst comprises the desired porous solid catalyst support and disposed thereon in intimate admixture catalytically active amounts of platinum and rhenium. The catalyst proposed for use in the present invention preferably comprises platinum in amounts of from about 0.01 to 3 weight percent and more preferably from about 0.2 to 1 weight percent based on the finished catalyst. Concentrations of platinum below about 0.01 weight percent are too low for satisfactory reforming operations, while on the other hand concentrations of platinum above about 3 weight percent are generally unsatisfactory because they produce excessive cracking. Furthermore, due to the high cost of platinum, the amount which can be used is somewhat restricted. The concentration of rhenium in the final catalyst composition is preferably from 0.01 to 5 weight percent and more preferably 0.1 to 2 Weight percent. Higher concentrations of rhenium could be advantageously used but the cost of rhenium limits the amount incorporated on the catalyst. It is preferred that the rhenium to platinum atom ratio be from about 0.2 to about 2.0. More particularly, it is preferred that the atom ratio of rhenium to platinum does not exceed one. Higher ratios (i.e., greater than one) of rhenium to platinum can be used but gene-rally no further significant improvement is obtained.
Although platinum and rhenium can be intimately associated with the porous solid carrier by suitable techniques such as by ion exchange, coprecipitation, etc., the metals are usually associated with the porous solid carrier by impregnation. Furthermore, one of the metals can be associated with the carrier by one procedure, e.g., ion-exchange, and the other metal associated with the carrier by another procedure, e.g., impregnation. As indicated, however, the metals are preferably associated with the carrier by impregnation. The catalyst can be prepared either by coimpregnation of the two metals or by sequential impregnation. In general, the carrier material is impregnated with an aqueous solution of a decomposable compound of the metal in sutficient concentration to provide the desired quantity of metal in the finished catalyst; the resulting mixture is then heated to remove water. Chloroplatinic acid is generally the preferred source of platinum. Other feasible platinum-containing compounds, e.g., ammonium chloroplatinates and polyammineplatinum salts, can
also be used. Rhenium compounds suitable for incorporation onto the carrier include, among others, perrhenic acid and ammonium or potassium perrhenates. It is contemplated in the present invention that incorporation of the metals with the carrier can be accomplished at any particular stage of the catalyst preparation. For example, if the metals are to be incorporated onto an alumina support, the incorporation may take place while the alumina is in the sol or gel form followed by precipitation of the alumina. Alternatively, a previously prepared alumina carrier can be impregnated with a water solution of the metal compounds. Regardless of the method of preparation of the supported platinum-rhenium catalyst it is desired that the platinum and rhenium be in intimate association with and dispersed throughout the porous solid catalyst support.
Following incorporation of the carrier material with platinum and rhenium, the resulting composite is usually dried by heating at a temperature of, for example, no greater than about 500 F. and preferably at about 200 F. to 400 F. Thereafter the composite can be calcined at an elevated temperature, e.g., up to about 1200 R, if desired.
The carrier containing platinum and rhenium is preferably heated at an elevated temperature to convert the platinum and rhenium to the metallic state. Preferably the heating is performed in the presence of hydrogen, and more preferably, dry hydrogen. In particular, it is preferred that this prereduction be accomplished at a temperature in the range of 600 F. to 1300 F., and preferably 600 to 1000 F.
Reforming with certain of the catalysts of the present invention initially produces an excessive amount of light hydrocarbon gases unless proper pretreatment or startup techniques are utilized. The light hydrocarbon gases are produced as a result of the high hydrocracking activity or metal-cracking activity of the catalyst. It has been found that the hydrocracking activity can be diminished if the catalyst is sulfided prior to contact with naphtha. The presulfiding can be done in situ or exsitu by passing a sulfur-containing gas, for example, H 8, through the catalyst bed. Other presulfiding treatments are known in the prior art. Also, it has been found that on startup a small amount of sulfur, for example H 3 or dimethyldisulfide added to the reforming zone effectively reduces the initial hydrocracking activity of the catalyst. The exact form of sulfur used in the sulfiding process is not critical. The sulfur can be introduced into the reaction zone in any convenient manner and at any convenient location. It can be contained in the liquid hydrocarbon feed, the hydrogen-rich gas, the recycle liquid stream or a recycle gas stream or any combination. After operating the reforming process in the presence of sulfur for a period of time short in com parison with the over-all run length that can be obtained with the novel catalyst, the addition of sulfur must be dis continued in order to realize the full benefits of the present invention such as decreased yield decline rate or improved stability. The period of time required to reduce the initial hydrocracking activity will vary from several hours to several hundred hours depending on the amount of sulfur used, the severity of operation, and the platinum/ rhenium ratio. The time required to reduce the initial hydrocracking activity will vary inversely to the amount of sulfur, the severity and the platinum/rhenium ratio.
It has also been found that a small amount of an oxyanion of sulfur, such as a sulfate, sulfite, bisulfate, or bisulfite, associated with the catalyst composition imparts beneficial properties to the catalyst, e.g., helps to control the initially high hydrocracking activity. Thus, for example, sulfate associated with :a catalyst comprising alumina and catalytically active amounts of platinum and rhenium reduces the yield of light hydrocarbon gases initially produced during reforming as well as during the dehydrocyclization of normal heptane to aromatics. The oxyanions of sulfur can be incorporated onto the catalyst composition during preparation of the porous solid carrier. For
example, in the preparation of an alumina carrier, the aluminum salt used as a starting material can be the sulfate form. Precipitation of alumina generally results in a minor amount of sulfate associated with the alumina. An oxyanion of sulfur can also be incorporated onto the catalyst carrier by contacting the previously prepared carrier with suitable compounds containing oxyanions of sulfur, e.g., SO 80 HSO or H80 The oxyanions of sulfur for purposes of the present invention can advantageously be present in the final catalyst in an amount from 0.05 to 2 weight percent and preferably from 0.1 to 1 weight percent.
The catalyst of the present invention preferably exists during the reforming process with the platinum and rhenium in the metallic state. Thus, even though the catalyst is contacted with sulfur, and the metals apparently converted to the sulfide form, prior to or during reforming in order to reduce the initial hydrocracking activity of the catalyst, the catalyst is stripped of sulfur during the initial period of reforming. Thus, the sulfur will have been stripped off, and the metals, platinum and rhenium, converted to the metallic state, in approximately the same length of time necessary to reduce the high hydrocracking activity. In order for the metals to exist in a sulfided form throughout the reforming process, sulfur would have to be continually added to the catalyst. But, sulfur addition throughout the reforming process is not satisfactory for the purposes of the present invention.
The catalyst can be promoted for reforming by the addition of halides, particularly fluoride or chloride. The halides apparently provide a limited amount of acidity to the catalyst which is beneficial to most reforming operations. A catalyst promoted with halide preferably contains from 0.1 to 3 weight percent total halide content. The haiides can be incorporated onto the catalyst carrier at any suitabe stage of catalyst manufacture, e.g. prior to or following inorpocration of the platinum and rhenium. Some halide is often incorporated onto the carrier when impregnating with the platinum; for example, impregnation with chloroplatinic acid normally results in chloride addition to the carrier. Additional halide may be incorporated onto the support simultaneously with incorporation of the metal if so desired. In general, the halides are combined with the catalyst carrier by contacting suitable compounds such as hydrogen fluoride, ammonium fluoride, hydrogen chloride, or ammonium chloride, either in the gaseous form or in a water soluble form, with the carrier. Preferably, the fluoride or chloride is incorporated onto the carrier from an aqueous solution containing the halide.
Generally the form in which the catalyst is prepared is controlled by the manipulative process to which it will be subjected. Thus, if the reforming process of the present invention is to be conducted in a fixed bed or moving bed process, the catalyst mixture -will be formed into tablets, pellets, spheroidal particles, or extruded particles; whereas if a fluidized bed operation is desired, the catalyst will be provided in a finely-divided form.
The feedstock to be employed in the reforming operation is a light hydrocarbon oil, for example, a naphtha fraction. Generally, the naphtha will boil in the range falling within the limits of from about 70 to 550 F. and preferably from 150 to 450 F. The feedstock can be, for examle, either a straight-run naphtha or a thermally cracked or catalytically cracked naphtha or blends thereof. The feed should be essentially sulfur free; that is, the feed should preferably contain less than about 10 ppm. sulfur and more preferably less than 5 p.p.m., and still more preferably less than 1 ppm. The presence of sulfur in the feed decreases the activity of the catalyst as well as its stability.
In the case of a feedstock which is not already low in sulfur, acceptable levels can be reached by hydrogenating the feedstock'in' a presaturation zone where the naphtha is contacted with a hydrogenation catalyst which is resistant to sulfur poisoning. A suitable catalyst for this hydrodesulfurization process is, for example, an aluminacontaining support and a minor proportion of mlybdenum oxide and cobalt oxide. Hydrodesulfurization is ordinarily conducted at 700850 F., at 200 to 2000 p.s.i.g., and at a liquid hourly space volecity of 1 to 5. The sulfur contained in the naphtha is converted to hydrogen sulfide which can be removed prior to reforming by suitable conventional processes.
The reforming conditions will depend in large measure on the feed used, whether highly aromatic, parafiinic, or naphthenic .and upon the desired octane rating of the product. The temperature in the reforming operation will generally be within the range of about 600 to 1100 F. and preferably about 700 to 1050 F. The pressure in the reforming reaction zone can be atmospheric, or superatmospheric; however, the pressure will in general lie within the range from about 25 to 1000 p.s.i.g. and preferably from about 50 to 750 p.s.i.g. The temperature and pressure can be correlated with the liquid hourly space ve ocity (LSHV) to favor any particularly desirable reforming reaction as, for example, aromatization or isomerization or dehydrogenation. In general, the liquid hourly space velocity will be from 0.1 to 10 and preferably from 1 to 5.
Reforming generally results in the production of hydrogen. Thus excess hydrogen need not necessarily be added to the reforming system. However, it is usually preferred to introduce excess hydrogen at some stage during the operation as, for example, during startup. The hydrogen can be introduced into the feed prior to contact with the catalyst or can be contacted simultaneously with the introduction of the feed to the reaction zone. Generally, the hydrogen is recirculated over the catalyst prior to contact or the feed with the catalys. The presence of hydrogen serves to reduce the formation of coke which tends to poison the catalyst. Moreover, the presence of hydrogen can be used to favor certain reforming reactions. Hydrogen is preferably introduced into the reforming reactor at a rate varying from about 0.5 to about 20 moles of hydrogen per mole of feed. The hydrogen can be in admixture with light gaseous hydrocarbons. Excess hydrogen removed after separation from the products will generally be purified and recycled to the reaction zone.
After a period of operation when the catalyst becomes deactivated by the presence of carbonaceous deposits, the catalyst can be reactivated or regenrated by passing an oxygen-containing gas, such as air, into contact with the catalyst at an elevated temperture in order to burn carbonaceous deposits from the catalyst. The method of regenerating the catalyst will depend on Whether there is a fixed bed, moving bed, or fluidized bed operation. Regeneration methods and conditions are Well known in the art.
The process of the present invention will be more readily understood by reference to the following examles.
EXAMPLE 1 A conventional, rhenium-free catalyst comprising 0.7 weight percent platinum on alumina was tested and compared for cyclohexane dehydrogenation activity with a series of catalysts comprising various rhenium levels on the aforementioned platinum-alumina composition.
The platinum-alumina catalyst was prepared by impregnating alumina with chloroplatinic acid. The platinumrhenium-alumina catalysts were prepared by impregnating previously impregnated platinum-alumina catalysts with aqueous solutions containing perrhenic acid in sufficient concentrations to provide the desired level of rhenium on the finished catalysts. Drying was accomplished by heating the catalysts for 12 hours at F. and then for 3 hours at 400 F. The catalysts impregnated with platinum or platinum and rhenium were subjected to a hydrogen atmosphere at a rate of 6.9 liters H per minute per gram of catalyst for two hours at various temperatures.
The cyclohexane dehydrogenation runs were conducted at a temperature of 485 F., a pressure of one atmosphere, and a hydrogen to hydrocarbon (cyclohexane) ratio of 10. The hydrogen rate to the reactor was 6.9 liters H per minute per gram catalyst. Cyclohexane was contacted with the catalyst at a rate of 0.17 liter liquid hydrocarbon per hour per gram of catalyst. Cyclohexane dehydrogenation rates, measured in terms of millimoles benzene produced per gram of catalyst per hour, were determined for the different catalysts having different rhenium contents and prereduced at different temperatures. The results are presented in Table I.
TABLE I.-CYCLOHEXANE DEHYDROGENAIION RATES Hydrogen Wt. percent Be on alumina carrier containing prereduction 0.7 wt. percent of platinum temp., F.
The catalysts containing platinum and rhenium were in all instances more active for the dehydrogenation of cyclohexane than the catalyst containing only platinum. Thus, for example, the catalyst containing 0.7 Weight percent rhenium and 0.7 weight percent platinum and prereduced at 1000 F. had a cyclohexane dehydrogenation rate of 54 as compared to the cyclohexane dehydrogenation rate of 37 for the platinum catalyst prereduced at 1000 F. and containing no rhenium. Furthermore, it is noted that the dehydrogenation rate for the catalyst containing only platinum falls off more rapidly with increasing prereduction temperature than the catalysts containing rhenium in addition to platinum. For example, the catalyst containing only platinum and prereduced at 1000 F. had a dehydrogenation rate of 37 whereas the same catalyst prereduced at a temperature of 1600 F. had a dehydrogenation rate of only 15, a decrease of more than half. The catalyst containing 0.2 Weight percent rhenium in addition to platinum, and prereduced at 1000 F., however, had a dehydrogenation rate of 48 compared to a dehydrogenation rate of 35 for the same catalyst prereduced at a temperature of 1600 F. This is a decrease of less than one-third, and indicates that the platinum-rhenium catalysts are more stable than platinum catalysts containing no rhenium.
EXAMPLE 2 A catalyst containing 0.7 weight percent platinum and 0.7 weight percent rhenium on an alumina carrier was compared with a catalyst containing 0.7 weight percent platinum in an accelerated reforming process. Catalysts were prepared and dried as described in Example 1, and then heated in hydrogen for about /2 hour at 450 F. and about 1%. hours at 700 F. The hydrogen flow rate in all instances was 4.0 milliliters H per minute per gram catalyst.
The feed used in the reforming operation was a hydrofined, catalytically cracked naphtha having an initial boiling point of 151 R, an end point of 428 F. and a 50 percent boiling point of 307 F. The research octane number of the feed without antiknock additives (F-l clear) was 64.6. The naphtha contained less than 0.1 p.p.m. nitrogen or sulfur. The reaction zone conditions were maintained at a pressure of 300 p.s.i.g., a liquid hourly space velocity of 3, and a temperature sutficient to produce a C product with an octane rating (F-l clear) of 100. Thus, the temperature in the reaction zone, as measured'by the average catalyst bed temperature, was changed with time in order to maintain a product having octane. The reforming process was conducted under conditions to simulate a life test for the catalyst. That is, conditions were not necessarily maintained at levels used in a commercial reforming process but were, in general, more severe in order to test, in a relatively short time of a few hundred hours, how well the catalyst would perform in a commercial operation. Hydrogen produced during the reforming process was circulated to the reaction zone to provide about 5.3 moles hydrogen per mole hydrocarbon feed.
The above comparison of Example 2 between the catalyst containing platinum and rhenium and the catalyst containing only platinum is shown in the appended figures. The change in average catalyst temperature needed in order to maintain the desired 100-octane (F1 clear) product is shown in FIGURE 1, and the yield of C gasoline having an octane rating of 100 is shown in FIGURE 2. The response of the platinum catalyst to the simulated life test was very poor. As seen in FIG- URE 1 it was necessary to increase the temperature exorbitantly in order to maintain a 100-octane (F-l clear) product. Moreover, the yield of C liquid product having the desired octane rating decreased significantly with time as shown in FIGURE 2. On the other hand, the catalyst containing platinum and rhenium displayed remarkable activity during the accelerated reforming test. From FIGURE 2 it can be seen that the naphtha feed was reformed to yield nearly 86 volume percent C product, having a 100-octane (F-l clear) rating, over almost the entire period of time of the test. From FIG- URE 1 it can be seen that the reforming temperature required to maintain a 100-octane (F1 clear) product increased only slightly as compared to the temperature increase in reforming with the platinum catalyst. It is apparent that rhenium improves the stability and activity of the platinum catalyst for reforming.
In Example 2, reforming with the catalyst comprising platinum and rhenium initially produced high yields of light hydrocarbon gases, particularly methane and ethane, compared to reforming with the catalyst comprising platinum without rhenium. Approximately hours of reforming were necessary in order to bring the light gas production with the platinum-rhenium catalyst down to the level of light gas production of the platinum catalyst. A large exotherm was also observed during the initial period of reforming With the platinum-rhenium catalyst. As an indication of the high yield of light gases produced during this initial ibreak-in period, measurements after 43 hours of operation showed 25.7 weight percent of the feed being converted to light hydrocarbon gases. The data used to make the comparison shown in the graphs in FIGURES 1 and 2 were obtained only after the yield of light gases using the platinum-rhenium catalyst approximated that of the platinum catalyst, i.e., after the initial 170 hours of operation.
The following examples illustrate the detrimental effect of sulfur in the feed on the catalytic reforming process of the present invention.
EXAMPLE 3 Two samples of catalyst were prepared and dried, as in Example 1, comprising 0.7 weight percent platinum and 0.7 weight percent rhenium supported on an alumina carrier. The samples were prereduced under various conditions and tested for the dehydrocyclization of n-heptane to aromatics. One sample, referred to as catalyst A, was contacted with hydrogen for 2 hours at 1000 F. and atmospheric pressure, and then for 2 hours at 900 F. and 20 p.s.i.g. The other sample, referred to as catalyst B, was contacted with hydrogen for 2 hours at 1000 F. and 250 p.s.i.g. The hydrogen flow rate was 1.4 milliliters gas per minute per gram of catalyst. The two catalyst samples were tested for the dehydrocyclization of n-heptane under reaction conditions including a temperature of 900 F. and a pressure of 250 p.s.i.g. Hydrogen was added TABLE I1 Catalyst Suliurinfeed, .m 200 p p 8. 3 0. 9
Moles aromatics produced/100 moles feed As can be seen from the above data, subjecting the catalyst containing platinum and rhenium to sulfur, has a deleterious effect upon the catalyst selectively.
EXAMPLE 4 A catalyst comprising approximately 0.6 weight percent platinum and 0.46 weight percent rhenium was prepared by impregnating a previously impregnated platinum-alumina support with an aqueous solution containing perrhenic acid. The catalyst was dried overnight in nitrogen at 300 F. and then heated for 200 hours in air at 700 F. and 400 hours in air at 900 F. Thereafter the catalyst comprising alumina impregnated with platinum and rhenium was subjected for one-half hour to a hydrogen atmosphere at 700 F. to reduce the metals. The catalyst was used in a reforming process using the feed described in Example 2. Different levels of sulfur were introduced into the feed during the process. The reforming conditions included a pressure of 5 00' p.s.ig., an LHSV of 2, and a hydrogen to hydrocarbon mole ratio of about 8.
The feed initially contained less than 0.1 p.p.m. sulfur. The F-l clear octane rating of the product produced during reforming was 97 with the average catalyst temperature being 920 F. 50 p.p.m. sulfur was introduced into the feed. The product octane number dropped to 91 and the average catalyst temperature increased to 929 P. On the addition of 500 p.p.m. sulfur to the feed, the product octane number dropped to 86 and the average catalyst tempertaure increased to 935 F. The C liquid volume yield remained approximately the same in all instances, i.e. at about 84 to 85 volume percent. The results are tabulated in Table III.
TABLE III Sulfur in feed, p.p.m. Average catalyst Product F-l clear temperature, F. octane number The detrimental effect of the presence of sulfur in the feed is readily apparent. The presence of sulfur in the feed decreases the endothermic reforming reactions which produce high octane gasoline. Thus, the catalyst temperature increases and the octane number decreases.
EXAMPLE 5 Cir of 5.3. The temperature was controlled throughout the reforming process to produce a F-l clear octane number product, The feed initially contained less than 0.1 p.p.m. sulfur. The starting temperature of the reforming process was about 940 F. During the first 845 hours of operation, the catalyst exhibited a low fouling rate; for example, from about 200 hours to 845 hours, the fouling rate was about 0.024 F. per hour. After approximately 845 hours of operation, 10 p.p.m. sulfur were added to the feed. The temperature required to make 100 F-l clear octane gasoline increased 20 degrees, that is, the catalyst became 20 degrees less active as a result of sulfur addition. After the removal of sulfur, the catalyst regained a small amount of activity but did not return to the activity which it exhibited prior to the addition of sulfur to the feed. The fouling rate of the catalyst after having seen sulfur was 0.045 F. per hour. Thus, it can be seen that even a small amount of sulfur in the feed, for example, 100 p.p.m. has detrimental effects on the catalyst.
The foregoing disclosure of this invention is not to be considered as limiting since many variations can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope or spirit of the appended claims.
1. A process for reforming a naphtha fraction containing less than about 10 p.p.m. sulfur which comprises subjecting said fraction to contact at reforming conditions and in the presence of hydrogen with a catalyst comprising an alumina support having disposed thereon in intimate admixture 0.01 to 3 weight percent platinum and 0.01 to 5 weight percent rhenium.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein said catalyst is promoted with from 0.1 to 3 Weight percent total halide selected from chloride and fluoride.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein said catalyst contains from 0.2 to 1 weight percent platinum and from 0.1 to 2 weight percent rhenium.
4. The process of claim 1 wherein said catalyst initially contains from 0.05 to 2 weight percent of an oxyanion of sulfur.
5. A process for reforming a naphtha fraction containing less than about 10 p.p.m. sulfur which comprises subjecting said fraction to contact at reforming conditions and in the presence of hydrogen with a catalyst comprising an alumina support having disposed thereon in intimate admixture 0.01 to 3 weight percent platinum and 0.01 to 5 weight percent rhenium, and excluding more than about 10 p.p.m. sulfur from the feed throughout the on-stream period of contact of said catalyst with the feed, except during the initial startup period with said catalyst which is substantially free of sulfur.
6. In a reforming process comprising contacting a naphtha feedstock containing less than about 10 p.p.m. sulfur at reforming conditions and in the presence of hydrogen with a reforming catalyst, comprising a dehydrogenation promoting metal component distributed throughout a porous solid catalyst carrier, and recovering a C gasoline fraction of improved octane rating, the improvement which comprises using as the catalyst an aluminacontaining carrier containing from 0.01 to 3 weight percent platinum promoted with an effective amount, less than 5 weight percent, of rhenium sufficient to measurably increase the stability of said catalyst when sulfur is excluded from the feedstock.
7. A process for reforming a naphtha fraction containing less than about 10 p.p.m. sulfur which comprises subjecting said fraction to contact at reforming conditions, including a temperature in the range from 700 to 1050 F. and a pressure from 50 to 700 p.s.i.g. and in the presence of at least 0.5 mole of hydrogen per mole of feed, with a catalyst comprising an alumina support having disposed thereon in intimate admixture from 0.2 to 1.0 weight percent platinum and at least 0.2 weight percent rhenium, the weight ratio of rhenium to platinum not exceeding 1.0.
References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS Smith et a1. 252-439 Haxton et a1. 208-65 Nixon 252-439 Schmitkons et a1. 208-139 Baldwin 208-139 Czajkowski et a]. 208-138 Capsuto et a1 208-139 Erbelding 208-254 14 3,287,171 11/1966 Holt 136-120 3,291,753 12/1966 Thompson 252-447 OTHER REFERENCES 5 Blom et al.: I&E Chem. 54, #4, 16-22 (April 1962).
Blom et a1.: Hydrocarbon Processing & Petroleum Refiner 42, #10, 132-134 (1963).
Muller et al.: Z. Chem. 5, 313-4 (1965).
DELBERT E. GANTZ, Primary Examiner. HERBERT LEVINE, Assistant Examiner.
US Cl. X.R.
UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Patent No. 3,415,737 December 10, 1968 Harris E. Kluksdahl It is certified that error appears in the above identified patent and that said Letters Patent are hereby corrected as shown below:
Column 1 line l6, "0. 1" should read 0. O1 Column 10, line 69 "2O p.s i .g. should read 250 psig Column ll, line 3 O milliliters" should read 80 milliliters Column 12, line 19, "100 p.p.m. should read 10 ppm Signed and sealed this 7th day of April 1970.
WILLIAM E. SCHUYLER, JR.
Edward M. Fletcher, Jr. Attesting Officer Commissioner of Patents
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2939847 *||Nov 21, 1957||Jun 7, 1960||Universal Oil Prod Co||Manufacture of noble metal catalyst|
|US2952611 *||Mar 11, 1958||Sep 13, 1960||American Oil Co||Regenerative platinum catalyst reforming|
|US2974111 *||Oct 13, 1958||Mar 7, 1961||Universal Oil Prod Co||Activated inorganic metal oxides|
|US3011967 *||Nov 24, 1959||Dec 5, 1961||Standard Oil Co||Platinum catalyst hydroforming and reactivation technique|
|US3224962 *||Jul 27, 1962||Dec 21, 1965||Shell Oil Co||Sulfide treatment of reforming catalyst|
|US3236765 *||Jul 31, 1962||Feb 22, 1966||Standard Oil Co||Denitrogenation of hydrocarbon mixtures|
|US3287171 *||Mar 27, 1963||Nov 22, 1966||Exxon Research Engineering Co||Platinum-rhenium anodic oxidation catalyst|
|US3291753 *||Sep 19, 1963||Dec 13, 1966||Exxon Research Engineering Co||Catalyst preparation|
|US3296118 *||Jun 15, 1960||Jan 3, 1967||Universal Oil Prod Co||Hydroforming with a platinum catalyst|
|US3330761 *||Oct 11, 1963||Jul 11, 1967||Mobil Oil Corp||Maintaining the selectivity of platinum group metal reforming catalyst|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3487009 *||Mar 24, 1969||Dec 30, 1969||Chevron Res||Low pressure reforming with a platinumrhenium-iridium catalyst|
|US3487010 *||Dec 10, 1968||Dec 30, 1969||Chevron Res||Iron-containing reforming catalyst|
|US3507780 *||Apr 7, 1969||Apr 21, 1970||Chevron Res||Startup procedure for a low content platinum rhenium-iridium catalyst reforming process|
|US3529029 *||Apr 7, 1969||Sep 15, 1970||Universal Oil Prod Co||Hydrogenation of aromatic hydrocarbons|
|US3537980 *||Mar 12, 1969||Nov 3, 1970||Chevron Res||Regeneration at low temperatures of platinum-rhenium reforming catalysts|
|US3617510 *||Sep 5, 1969||Nov 2, 1971||Universal Oil Prod Co||Hydroprocessing with a germanium-rhenium-group viii noble metal catalyst|
|US3617519 *||Jan 29, 1969||Nov 2, 1971||Universal Oil Prod Co||Controlled sulfur content in platinum-rhenium reforming|
|US3617520 *||Jun 25, 1969||Nov 2, 1971||Chevron Res||Sulfiding of low platinum content catalyst|
|US3617522 *||Sep 24, 1969||Nov 2, 1971||Universal Oil Prod Co||Catalytic reforming of a relatively lean charge stock|
|US3639273 *||Jul 11, 1969||Feb 1, 1972||Chevron Res||Catalyst composition comprising a mixture|
|US3658691 *||Mar 20, 1970||Apr 25, 1972||Keith Carl D||Serial reforming with platinum-rhenium on acidic support and platinum on non acidic support|
|US3676328 *||Jun 12, 1970||Jul 11, 1972||Atlantic Richfield Co||Reforming with five platinum rhenium catalyst beds|
|US3676329 *||Jun 12, 1970||Jul 11, 1972||Engelhard Min & Chem||Reforming with four or five platinum rhenium catalyst beds|
|US3764557 *||Jan 11, 1971||Oct 9, 1973||Chevron Res||Catalyst activation process and activated catalyst|
|US3819507 *||Jun 15, 1972||Jun 25, 1974||Sun Research Development||Dehydrocyclization of paraffins and catalyst therefor|
|US3846343 *||May 2, 1972||Nov 5, 1974||Erickson H||Process for preparing a platinum-rhenium catalyst on an alumina support|
|US3847794 *||May 29, 1973||Nov 12, 1974||Universal Oil Prod Co||Sulfur-free reforming with a platinum-tin catalyst|
|US3875047 *||Apr 18, 1973||Apr 1, 1975||Atlantic Richfield Co||Platinum-rhenium serial reforming in four beds|
|US3879484 *||Oct 1, 1970||Apr 22, 1975||Universal Oil Prod Co||Hydrocarbon isomerization process|
|US3925196 *||Oct 31, 1973||Dec 9, 1975||Exxon Research Engineering Co||Reforming process|
|US3932548 *||Mar 8, 1974||Jan 13, 1976||Universal Oil Products Company||Dehydrogenation method and multimetallic catalytic composite for use therein|
|US3939220 *||Jan 18, 1974||Feb 17, 1976||Universal Oil Products Company||Dehydrogenation method and multimetallic catalytic composite for use therein|
|US3951782 *||Mar 9, 1972||Apr 20, 1976||Chevron Research Company||Reforming with a group IIB-containing catalyst|
|US3962139 *||Nov 28, 1973||Jun 8, 1976||Stamicarbon B.V.||Catalyst preparation|
|US3968025 *||Feb 20, 1969||Jul 6, 1976||Chevron Research Company||Hydrocarbon conversion process|
|US3977999 *||Sep 7, 1972||Aug 31, 1976||Atlantic Richfield Company||Alumina compositions and methods for making and using same|
|US4002555 *||Jan 7, 1976||Jan 11, 1977||Chevron Research Company||Hydrocarbon reforming process|
|US4012313 *||Sep 12, 1975||Mar 15, 1977||Chevron Research Company||Catalytic reforming process and catalyst|
|US4013733 *||Oct 6, 1975||Mar 22, 1977||Uop Inc.||Dehydrogenation method|
|US4018839 *||Jun 7, 1976||Apr 19, 1977||Uop Inc.||Hydrocarbon isomerization process|
|US4018845 *||Jun 7, 1976||Apr 19, 1977||Uop Inc.||Hydrocarbon isomerization process|
|US4059645 *||Nov 10, 1976||Nov 22, 1977||Chevron Research Company||Alkylaromatic isomerization process|
|US4061592 *||Dec 12, 1975||Dec 6, 1977||Chevron Research Company||Hydrocarbon conversion catalyst|
|US4082697 *||Aug 23, 1976||Apr 4, 1978||Chevron Research Company||Catalyst carrier, its method of preparation and a reforming catalyst supported on the carrier|
|US4124490 *||Mar 2, 1977||Nov 7, 1978||Atlantic Richfield Company||Hydrocarbon reforming process|
|US4129497 *||Oct 13, 1977||Dec 12, 1978||Chevron Research Company||Hydrocarbon catalytic reforming process|
|US4137153 *||Mar 3, 1978||Jan 30, 1979||Uop Inc.||Hydrocarbon conversion with an attenuated superactive multimetallic catalytic composite|
|US4157989 *||May 18, 1978||Jun 12, 1979||Uop Inc.||Superactive multimetallic catalytic composite|
|US4165276 *||Sep 14, 1977||Aug 21, 1979||Uop Inc.||Hydrocarbon conversion with a superactive multimetallic catalytic composite|
|US4169813 *||Mar 13, 1978||Oct 2, 1979||Uop Inc.||Acidic multimetallic catalytic composite|
|US4178268 *||Jan 25, 1978||Dec 11, 1979||Uop Inc.||Selectively sulfided acidic multimetallic catalytic composite|
|US4179405 *||May 17, 1978||Dec 18, 1979||Uop Inc.||Acidic sulfur-free multimetallic catalytic composite|
|US4190557 *||Aug 10, 1978||Feb 26, 1980||Uop Inc.||Attenuated superactive multimetallic catalytic composite|
|US4210523 *||Feb 21, 1979||Jul 1, 1980||Uop Inc.||Hydrocarbon conversion with a superactive multimetallic catalytic composite containing two different types of rhenium sites|
|US4210524 *||Mar 7, 1979||Jul 1, 1980||Uop Inc.||Hydrocarbon conversion with a superactive multimetallic catalytic composite containing two different types of rhenium sites|
|US4210769 *||Apr 30, 1979||Jul 1, 1980||Uop Inc.||Hydrocarbon dehydrogenation with a superactive multimetallic catalytic composite for use therein|
|US4214980 *||Dec 9, 1977||Jul 29, 1980||Societe Francaise Des Produits Pour Catalyse||Catalytic hydroreforming process|
|US4222854 *||May 23, 1979||Sep 16, 1980||Chevron Research Company||Catalytic reforming of naphtha fractions|
|US4250056 *||Jan 15, 1980||Feb 10, 1981||Societe Francaise Des Produits Pour Catalyse||Catalysts for hydroreforming|
|US4251391 *||Apr 13, 1979||Feb 17, 1981||Exxon Research & Engineering Co.||Reforming with multimetallic catalysts|
|US4251392 *||Apr 30, 1979||Feb 17, 1981||Exxon Research & Engineering Co.||Reforming with multimetallic catalysts|
|US4261810 *||Mar 17, 1980||Apr 14, 1981||Mobil Oil Corporation||Startup procedure for reforming catalysts|
|US4261811 *||Apr 6, 1979||Apr 14, 1981||Standard Oil Company (Indiana)||Reforming with an improved rhenium-containing catalyst|
|US4268377 *||Oct 5, 1979||May 19, 1981||Uop Inc.||Hydrocarbon conversion with an activated multimetallic catalytic composite|
|US4295957 *||Jul 14, 1980||Oct 20, 1981||Exxon Research & Engineering Co.||Reforming with multimetallic catalysts|
|US4295958 *||Jul 14, 1980||Oct 20, 1981||Exxon Research & Engineering Co.||Reforming with multimetallic catalysts|
|US4295959 *||Oct 20, 1980||Oct 20, 1981||Uop Inc.||Hydrocarbon dehydrocyclization with an attentuated superactive multimetallic catalytic composite|
|US4298461 *||Nov 8, 1979||Nov 3, 1981||Standard Oil Company (Indiana)||Catalyst and process|
|US4299689 *||Oct 23, 1980||Nov 10, 1981||Uop Inc.||Hydrocarbon conversion with an attenuated superactive multimetallic catalytic composite|
|US4333854 *||Oct 23, 1980||Jun 8, 1982||Uop Inc.||Sulfided superactive multimetallic catalytic composite|
|US4356081 *||Apr 28, 1980||Oct 26, 1982||Gallagher James P||Catalytic reforming with rhenium-platinum catalyst containing more rhenium than platinum|
|US4369129 *||Apr 10, 1981||Jan 18, 1983||Exxon Research And Engineering Co.||Production of rhenium-containing reforming catalysts|
|US4416806 *||Mar 4, 1983||Nov 22, 1983||Elf France||Catalyst for production of aromatic hydrocarbons and process for preparation|
|US4440626 *||Apr 6, 1983||Apr 3, 1984||Exxon Research And Engineering Co.||Catalytic reforming process|
|US4440627 *||Apr 6, 1983||Apr 3, 1984||Exxon Research And Engineering Co.||Catalytic reforming process|
|US4440628 *||Apr 6, 1983||Apr 3, 1984||Exxon Research And Engineering Co.||Catalytic reforming process|
|US4560803 *||Jul 25, 1983||Dec 24, 1985||Exxon Research & Engineering Co.||Catalysts and process for oxidation of olefins to ketones|
|US4613424 *||Sep 9, 1985||Sep 23, 1986||Exxon Research And Engineering Co.||Catalytic reforming process|
|US4714538 *||Apr 10, 1987||Dec 22, 1987||Uop Inc.||Trimetallic reforming catalyst|
|US4714539 *||Apr 10, 1987||Dec 22, 1987||Uop Inc.||Reforming of hydrocarbons utilizing a trimetallic catalyst|
|US4714540 *||Apr 13, 1987||Dec 22, 1987||Uop Inc.||Reforming of hydrocarbons utilizing a trimetallic catalyst|
|US4737262 *||Feb 3, 1987||Apr 12, 1988||Institut Francais Du Petrole||Process for the catalytic reforming of a charge passing through at least two catalyst beds|
|US4737482 *||Sep 16, 1985||Apr 12, 1988||Exxon Research & Engineering Co.||Catalysts for oxidation of olefins to ketones|
|US4876392 *||Mar 28, 1988||Oct 24, 1989||Exxon Research & Engineering Company||Process for preparation of keystones by oxidation of secondary alcohols using a trimetallic catalyst comprising molybdenum, rhenium and a group VIII noble metal|
|US4962250 *||Jan 24, 1990||Oct 9, 1990||Mobile Oil Corp.||Process for the conversion of paraffins to olefins and/or aromatics and non-acidic zeolite catalyst therefor|
|US5019664 *||Jan 24, 1990||May 28, 1991||Mobil Oil Corp.||Process for the conversion of paraffins to olefins and/or aromatics and low acidity zeolite catalyst therefor|
|US5036035 *||Mar 21, 1989||Jul 30, 1991||Research Association For Utilization Of Light Oil||Solid strong acid catalyst process for the production of the same and use thereof|
|US5066632 *||Mar 13, 1990||Nov 19, 1991||Exxon Research & Engineering Company||Reforming catalyst|
|US5227357 *||Mar 15, 1991||Jul 13, 1993||China Petro-Chemical Corporation||Method for preparing a catalyst for reforming naphtha|
|US5922639 *||Jun 14, 1996||Jul 13, 1999||Institut Francais Du Petrole||Catalysts for use in hydrocarbon conversion reactions and containing one doping metal chosen from the group consisting of titanium, zirconium, hafnium, cobalt, nickel, zinc, the lanthanides and alkali and alkaline-earth metals|
|US6007700 *||Jun 14, 1996||Dec 28, 1999||Institut Francais Du Petrole||Process for the catalyst conversion of hydrocarbons into aromatics using a catalyst containing at least one doping metal chosen from the group consisting of titanium, zirconium, hafnium, cobalt, nickel, zinc, and/or the lanthanides|
|US6083867 *||Aug 31, 1998||Jul 4, 2000||Phillips Petroleum Company||Hybrid catalyst system for converting hydrocarbons and a method of making and using such catalyst system|
|US6172273||Feb 23, 2000||Jan 9, 2001||Phillips Petroleum Company||Method for converting hydrocarbons to aromatics using a hybrid catalyst system|
|US6241952||Aug 12, 1999||Jun 5, 2001||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Countercurrent reactor with interstage stripping of NH3 and H2S in gas/liquid contacting zones|
|US6258256||Jan 4, 1994||Jul 10, 2001||Chevron Phillips Chemical Company Lp||Cracking processes|
|US6419986||Jan 10, 1997||Jul 16, 2002||Chevron Phillips Chemical Company Ip||Method for removing reactive metal from a reactor system|
|US6441263||Jul 7, 2000||Aug 27, 2002||Chevrontexaco Corporation||Ethylene manufacture by use of molecular redistribution on feedstock C3-5 components|
|US6495029||Aug 27, 1999||Dec 17, 2002||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Countercurrent desulfurization process for refractory organosulfur heterocycles|
|US6497810||Dec 7, 1999||Dec 24, 2002||Larry L. Laccino||Countercurrent hydroprocessing with feedstream quench to control temperature|
|US6548030||Sep 10, 2001||Apr 15, 2003||Chevron Phillips Chemical Company Lp||Apparatus for hydrocarbon processing|
|US6551660||Apr 18, 2001||Apr 22, 2003||Chevron Phillips Chemical Company Lp||Method for removing reactive metal from a reactor system|
|US6562749 *||Nov 26, 1996||May 13, 2003||Shell Oil Company||Process for the preparation of a catalyst or catalyst precursor|
|US6566569||Jun 23, 2000||May 20, 2003||Chevron U.S.A. Inc.||Conversion of refinery C5 paraffins into C4 and C6 paraffins|
|US6569314||Dec 7, 1999||May 27, 2003||Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company||Countercurrent hydroprocessing with trickle bed processing of vapor product stream|
|US6579443||Dec 7, 1999||Jun 17, 2003||Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company||Countercurrent hydroprocessing with treatment of feedstream to remove particulates and foulant precursors|
|US6602483||Jun 21, 2001||Aug 5, 2003||Chevron Phillips Chemical Company Lp||Increasing production in hydrocarbon conversion processes|
|US6623621||Dec 7, 1999||Sep 23, 2003||Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company||Control of flooding in a countercurrent flow reactor by use of temperature of liquid product stream|
|US6667270||May 22, 2002||Dec 23, 2003||Shell Oil Company||Bismuth-and phosphorus-containing catalyst support, reforming catalysts made from same, method of making and naphtha reforming process|
|US6777117 *||Mar 16, 2000||Aug 17, 2004||Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd.||Catalysts for water gas shift reaction, method for removing carbon monoxide in hydrogen gas and electric power-generating system of fuel cell|
|US6835301||Dec 7, 1999||Dec 28, 2004||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Production of low sulfur/low aromatics distillates|
|US6864212||Aug 8, 2002||Mar 8, 2005||Shell Oil Company||Bismuth- and phosphorus-containing reforming catalysts, method of making and naphtha reforming process|
|US7538063||Jan 6, 2005||May 26, 2009||Shell Oil Company||Bismuth- and phosphorus-containing reforming catalysts, method of making and naphtha reforming process|
|US8980785 *||Jan 13, 2011||Mar 17, 2015||Johnson Matthey Plc||Catalyst structures|
|US9340424||Feb 10, 2015||May 17, 2016||Johnson Matthey Plc||Catalyst structures|
|US20130039828 *||Jan 13, 2011||Feb 14, 2013||Johnson Matthey Plc||Catalyst structures|
|USB411483 *||Oct 31, 1973||Jan 28, 1975||Title not available|
|USRE31647 *||May 27, 1982||Aug 14, 1984||Mobil Oil Corporation||Startup procedure for reforming catalysts|
|CN101468313B||Dec 28, 2007||Aug 20, 2014||中国石油化工股份有限公司||Method for preparing reforming catalyst|
|DE2736996A1 *||Aug 17, 1977||Mar 9, 1978||Chevron Res||Reformierungskatalysator und kohlenwasserstoffreformierungsverfahren unter verwendung des katalysators|
|DE2752404A1 *||Nov 24, 1977||Jun 8, 1978||Chevron Res||Verfahren zur alternierenden reformierung und isomerisierung|
|DE2839795A1 *||Sep 13, 1978||Mar 15, 1979||Uop Inc||Katalysator und dessen verwendung|
|DE3038231A1 *||Oct 7, 1980||Apr 23, 1981||Exxon Research Engineering Co||Katalytisches reforming-verfahren|
|DE3410404A1 *||Mar 21, 1984||Sep 27, 1984||Chevron Res||Process for the conversion of hydrocarbons|
|DE3410404C3 *||Mar 21, 1984||Aug 5, 1999||Chevron Res & Tech||Verfahren zur Gewinnung von Aromaten und Wasserstoff aus Kohlenwasserstoffen|
|WO2014113135A1||Nov 19, 2013||Jul 24, 2014||Chevron U.S.A. Inc.||Paraffinic jet and diesel fuels and base oils from vegetable oils via a combination of hydrotreating, paraffin disproportionation and hydroisomerization|
|U.S. Classification||208/139, 502/230, 502/334, 502/223, 208/138, 502/217|
|International Classification||C08F4/26, C10M, C10G35/09, C07C5/367, C10G, B01J23/656|
|Cooperative Classification||C10G35/09, C07C5/367, B01J23/6567|
|European Classification||C07C5/367, B01J23/656H, C10G35/09|