|Publication number||US3420291 A|
|Publication date||Jan 7, 1969|
|Filing date||Dec 29, 1965|
|Priority date||Dec 29, 1965|
|Publication number||US 3420291 A, US 3420291A, US-A-3420291, US3420291 A, US3420291A|
|Inventors||Chandley George D, Uram Stuart Z|
|Original Assignee||Trw Inc|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (5), Referenced by (18), Classifications (7)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Jan. 7, 1969 gHANDLEY ET AL 3,420,291
METHOD FOR REDUCING METAL CASTING POROSITY Filed Dec. 29, 1965 INVENTOR. George 0. C'fiawd/ey J/aar/ Z. Ufa/27 y w @zvwhg 15%! W ATTORNEYS United States Patent 7 Claims Int. Cl. B2211 23/00 ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE Casting process wherein molten metal is cast into a preheated, gas permeable mold and thereafter a substantial positive gas pressure is applied to the material in the mold to effect a condition of pneumatic forging, thereby substantially reducing the amount of microporosity in the casting produced.
The present invention relates to a method of casting by means of which microporosity is substantially reduced, if not eliminated.
Metal castings normally contain varying amounts of porosity as a result of solidification shrinkage. With many metals, this porosity is substantially eliminated by subsequently hot working operations. However, certain alloys are very difiicult or impossible to hot work by conventional means. It is therefore necessary to reduce or eliminate porosity in such alloys during the actual casting.
Microporosity is a particularly difiicult problem when attempting to produce high quality hollow castings. In the past, attempts to overcome this problem during the casting operation have required the use of elaborate gating and risering techniques which added to the cost and complexity of the casting operation. Such techniques have not succeeded.
One of the objects of the present invention is to provide a method for casting to achieve a soundness approximating that achieved in wrought products without distortion of the casting and without destroying the original cast structure.
Another object of the invention is to provide a method for eliminating microporosity in alloys which are not forgeable.
Still another object of the invention is to provide a method of casting which produces very accurate dimensions in the casting and does not require extensive finishing operations which are required when a forging operation is employed.
A further object of the invention is to provide a method which can be used to produce high quality hollow castings.
A still further object of the invention is to provide a method of casting which achieves soundness in the casting without the use of extensive gating and risering techniques.
The method of the present invention involves the use of a pneumatic forging operation under isostatic conditions during solidification of the casting. Basically, the method involves positioning of gas permeable ceramic mold within an enclosure, the mold having a temperature determined to be optimum or appropriate for the casting of a part having the particular shape and thickness and casting the metal into the mold while the mold is at this elevated temperature. After completion of the casting, a substantial positive gas pressure is established in the enclosure, using a gas which is substantially unreactive with the metal. After solidification, the resulting casting may 'be recovered in the usual way by the destruction of the mold.
The ceramic mold which is used in accordance with the present invention is one which has a significant degree of gas permeability. Such molds are commonly produced by precision investment casting techniques utilizing wax or Wax and resin mixtures as a disposable pattern material. One such method involves coating a disposable pat tern of wax or the like by dipping it in an aqueous ceramic slurry having a temperature about the same as that of the pattern material to form a refractory layer of a few mils in thickness. A typical slurry may contain ceramic materials such as zirconium oxide, a binder such as colloidal silica, and a thickener and 'low temperature binder such as methyl cellulose. The initial layer while still wet is then dusted with small particles (40 to 200 mesh) of a refractory glass composition such as that known as Vycor which is a finely divided high silicon oxide glass containing about 96% silica and a small amount of boric acid together with traces of aluminum, sodium, iron and arsenic. The dusted wet refractory layer on the pattern is then suspended on a conveyor and moved through a drying oven having a controlled humidity and temperature, wherein the coated pattern is dried adiabatically.
The steps of dipping, dusting and adiabatic drying are then repeated using air at progressively lower humidities for succeeding coats. For example, the first two coats can be dried with air having a relative humidity of 45 to 55%. The third and fourth coats can be dried with a relative humidity of 35 to 45%, the fifth and sixth coats with a relative humidity of 25 to 30%, and the final coats with a relative humidty of 15 to 25%.
The first layer is preferably applied to a thickness of 0.005 to 0.020 inch, and the fine refractory particles are dusted onto the wet layer with sufficient force to embed the particles therein. It is preferred that the dusting procedure used provide a dense uniform cloud of fine particles that strike the wet coating with substantial impact force. The force should not be so great, however, as to break or knock off the wet prime layer from the pattern. This process is repeated until a plurality of integrated layers is obtained, the thickness of the layers each being about 0.005 to 0.020 inch.
After the mold is built up on the pattern material, the pattern can be removed by heat, and then the green mold is ready for firing. Generally, firing temperatures on the order of 1,500 to 1,900" F. are used. The resulting shell molds are hard, smooth, and relatively permeable and measure on the order of /s to inch in thickness.
The ceramic shell mold is preheated, either before introduction into the enclosure, or while it is so enclosed, to a temperature approaching the solidification point of the metal to be cast therein. Generally, this means heating the mold to a temperature within the range from about 600 F. below the solidification point, to a few degrees below the solidification point.
The molten metal, superheated to a temperature appropriate to the shape to be poured, is then introduced into the mold either in air or under vacuum conditions, depending upon the nature of the alloy being cast. When the casting has been completed, the enclosure is made gas tight, and then the inert gas is introduced into the enclosure under substantial pressures ranging from about 1,000 to 4,000 pounds per square inch, with 2,000 to 3,000 pounds per square inch being preferred. The gas used is inert in the sense that it is not reactive substantially with the molten metal. For reactive melts such as the so-called superalloys, an atmosphere of a completely inert gas such as helium or argon is provided.
The pressure of the gas in the enclosure exceeds the strength of the metal casting during solidification. As a result, the metal solidifies under isostatic conditions, resulting in the production of a casting of extreme soundness. The method has been found to virtually eliminate microporosity in alloys which evidenced such microporosity even under the most carefully controlled casting conditions.
A further description of the present invention will be made in conjunction with the attached sheet of drawings in which:
FIGURE 1 is a cross-sectional view of the components of the casting assembly prior to casting of the metal therein; and
FIGURE 2 is a view similar to FIGURE 1 but illustrating the assembly after casting has been completed, and during application of the gas pressure during solidification.
AS SHOWN IN THE DRAWINGS In FIGURE 1, reference numeral indicates generally a high pressure container which is lined with a lining 11 composed of an insulating refractory material or an exothermic material. A porous ceramic shell mold generally indicated at reference numeral 12 is posi.ioned in the container 10 and is preheated, either outside the container 10 or while in the container to a temperature approximating the solidification point of the metal to be introduced into the mold. The shell mold 12 includes a casting cavity 13, a gating cavity 14 and a runner 16, in accordance with usual practices of mold design.
An insulating cover 17 is positioned over the liner 11, and the cover 17 having a centrally disposed aperture 18 which is arranged to overlie the gating cavity 14.
A refractory cover 19 is threadedly engaged, or otherwise secured to the top of the container 10, and a funnel 21 is inserted into a central aperture 22 of the cover 19. The funnel serves to direct molten metal through the aperture 18 and ultimately into the casting cavity 13 of the mold 12.
The pouring may occur in air or under vacuum conditions, depending upon the nature of the metal or alloy being poured. Immediately after pouring, the funnel 21 is removed, and a cap 23 (FIGURE 2) is threadedly engaged with the threads existing along the aperture 22. The insertion of the cap 23 serves to make the entire enclosure 10 gas tight. A high pressure gas stream is introduced into the container 10 by means of a fitting 24 and a conduit 26 connected to a pump or other suitable device for introducing the gas under high pressure into the container.
The high pressure gas environment is maintained during solidification of the metal which may take from a few minutes to 30 minutes or so. At the completion of the solidification, the container is disassembled, and the mold broken away from the solidified casting. The casting can then be processed with normal manufacturing methods.
The following specific examples illustrate the method of the present invention, and the advantages achieved through its use.
EXAMPLE I A number of jet engine blades were cast from a nickel base superalloy having a solidification point of about 2,350 F. A mold constructed as shown in FIGURES l and 2 was preheated to approximately 2,500 P. and placed in the container. The container was lined with exothermic material which had been preheated to a temperature of about 2,450 F. The pouring funnel was placed in position, and the entire assembly was evacuated to a pressure of approximately microns of mercury. The alloy was melted, superheated to 3,000 B, and poured into the mold cavity. The funnel was then removed, the cover was screwed on, and a pressure of 2,000 pounds per square inch of argon was fed into the pressure chamber. This pressure was maintained on the casting for 10 minutes. The apparatus was disassembled and the resulting casting was sectioned and evaluated for microporosity. The average amount of porosity in a controlled casting without the use of the high pressure environment was 1.2%. The average amount in the root section of the casting solidified under the conditions of high gas pressure was 0.12%, indicating a reduction of microporosity of approximately EXAMPLE II A inch diameter bar with a pour cup on one end was made in air from the alloy Hastalloy B. The bars were made under identical conditions, except for the use of the high pressure gas environment in some samples. Those samples which solidified in the high pressure environment exhibited an X-ray soundness which was quite satisfactory, while the bars which solidified under normal conditions contained extensive shrinkage porosity.
From the foregoing it will be understood that the method of the present invention provides a means for securing castings of a soundness heretofore unattainable in the absence of subsequent hot working. The resultant casting is very accurate dimensionally and does not require extensive finishing operations.
It should be evident that various modifications can be made to the described embodiments without departing from the scope of the present invention.
We claim as our invention:
1. The method of casting a metal which is subject to contamination and microporosity which comprises positioning a gas permeable ceramic mold within an enclosure, casting the molten metal into said mold, sealing oil? the enclosure to make it gas tight, introducing a gas inert to the molten metal into said enclosure and enveloping the entire mold contained therein, the pressure of the gas within the enclosure being at least 1,000 pounds per square inch, and cooling said metal while exposed to said gas pressure to produce a casting having reduced microporosity.
2. The method of claim 1 in which said mold is heated to a temperature within about 600 F. of the solidification point of said metal immediately prior to casting said metal therein.
3. The method of claim 1 in which said gas pressure is in the range from about 1,000 to 4,000 pounds per square inch.
4. The method of claim 1 in which said gas pressure is in the range from about 2,000 to 3,000 pounds per square inch.
5. The method of claim 1 in which said gas is helium.
6. The method of claim 1 in which said gas is argon.
7. The method of claim 1 in which said metal is superheated before it is cast into said mold.
References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 315,741 4/1885 Henderson 1641 20 2,961,751 11/1960 Operhall et a1 16426 2,824,794 2/1958 Hathaway l6468 X 2,796,644 6/1957 Kuhn 164-119 XR FOREIGN PATENTS 73 8,757 10/1955 Great Britain.
I J. SPENCER OVERHOLSER, Primary Examiner.
V. K. RISING, Assistant Examiner.
U.S. Cl. X.R. 164120, 119
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US315741 *||Apr 14, 1885||Mold for casting steel|
|US2796644 *||May 3, 1952||Jun 25, 1957||Nat Lead Co||Method and apparatus for casting refractory metals|
|US2824794 *||May 18, 1954||Feb 25, 1958||Nat Lead Co||Process for fusion of high-melting metals|
|US2961751 *||Jan 13, 1958||Nov 29, 1960||Misco P C Inc||Ceramic metal casting process|
|GB738757A *||Title not available|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3590903 *||Mar 19, 1968||Jul 6, 1971||Monsanto Chemicals||Production of metal castings|
|US3693698 *||Mar 28, 1969||Sep 26, 1972||Inst Po Metalloznanie I Tekno||Method of casting volatile metals|
|US4021910 *||Apr 14, 1976||May 10, 1977||Howmet Turbine Components Corporation||Method for treating superalloy castings|
|US5014764 *||Nov 16, 1989||May 14, 1991||Aluminium Pechiney||Lost-foam casting of aluminum under pressure|
|US5088544 *||Oct 9, 1990||Feb 18, 1992||Aluminium Pechiney||Process for the lost-foam casting, under controlled pressure, of metal articles|
|US5335711 *||Apr 29, 1992||Aug 9, 1994||Ae Plc||Process and apparatus for metal casting|
|US5398745 *||May 7, 1993||Mar 21, 1995||Pcc Composites, Inc.||Method of directionally cooling using a fluid pressure induced thermal gradient|
|US5553656 *||Mar 20, 1995||Sep 10, 1996||Pcc Composites, Inc.||Method of directionally cooling using a fluid pressure induced thermal gradient|
|US5626179 *||Jun 2, 1995||May 6, 1997||Ald Vacuum Technologies Gmbh||Process for manufacture of castings of reactive metals|
|US6019158 *||May 14, 1998||Feb 1, 2000||Howmet Research Corporation||Investment casting using pour cup reservoir with inverted melt feed gate|
|US6070644 *||May 14, 1998||Jun 6, 2000||Howmet Research Corporation||Investment casting using pressure cap sealable on gas permeable investment mold|
|US6453979||Nov 16, 1999||Sep 24, 2002||Howmet Research Corporation||Investment casting using melt reservoir loop|
|US6640877||Jun 27, 2002||Nov 4, 2003||Howmet Research Corporation||Investment casting with improved melt filling|
|US9381569||Mar 7, 2013||Jul 5, 2016||Howmet Corporation||Vacuum or air casting using induction hot topping|
|EP0241426A1 *||Apr 6, 1987||Oct 14, 1987||Schweizerische Aluminium Ag||Process and plant for pressure casting|
|EP0421039A1 *||Nov 16, 1989||Apr 10, 1991||Aluminium Pechiney||Lost foam pressure casting process for metal pieces|
|EP0426581A1 *||Oct 29, 1990||May 8, 1991||Aluminium Pechiney||Process for the lost foam casting of metal pieces under controlled pressure|
|EP0677347A1 *||Apr 12, 1994||Oct 18, 1995||Pcc Composites, Inc.||A method for casting and densification|
|U.S. Classification||164/66.1, 164/119, 164/120|
|International Classification||B22D27/13, B22D27/00|