US3453202A - Hydrogenation of coal tar - Google Patents

Hydrogenation of coal tar Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3453202A
US3453202A US597370A US3453202DA US3453202A US 3453202 A US3453202 A US 3453202A US 597370 A US597370 A US 597370A US 3453202D A US3453202D A US 3453202DA US 3453202 A US3453202 A US 3453202A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
coal tar
iodine
hydrogenation
hydrogen
catalyst
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US597370A
Inventor
Louis D Friedman
Ralph Tracy Eddinger
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
FMC Corp
Original Assignee
FMC Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by FMC Corp filed Critical FMC Corp
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3453202A publication Critical patent/US3453202A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G49/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds, not provided for in a single one of groups C10G45/02, C10G45/32, C10G45/44, C10G45/58 or C10G47/00
    • C10G49/007Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds, not provided for in a single one of groups C10G45/02, C10G45/32, C10G45/44, C10G45/58 or C10G47/00 in the presence of hydrogen from a special source or of a special composition or having been purified by a special treatment
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G1/00Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures from oil-shale, oil-sand, or non-melting solid carbonaceous or similar materials, e.g. wood, coal
    • C10G1/08Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures from oil-shale, oil-sand, or non-melting solid carbonaceous or similar materials, e.g. wood, coal with moving catalysts
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G65/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only
    • C10G65/02Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only
    • C10G65/12Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only including cracking steps and other hydrotreatment steps

Definitions

  • This invention relates to improvements in the hydrogenation of coal tar and similar materials. More particularly, the invention pertains to the visbreaking of coal tar by hydrogenation in the presence of elemental iodine as the hydrogenation catalyst.
  • coal tar In order to constitute a practical and economical source of gasoline, coal tar must be converted into a form suitable for processing in an oil refinery. As is well known, the modern refinery is designedprimarily to ⁇ operate with petroleum or crude oil; it cannot be operatedusing coal tar as rawv material without extensive modification in design and construction. As a consequence coal tar requires further processing in yorder tov adaptit as a refinery stock.
  • the method normally employed to convert coal tar into a suitable raw material capable of being used by the refinery is hydrogenation.
  • This treatment -transforms coal tar into a relatively mobile, oily fluid which ⁇ can be easily handled and transported.
  • Such liquefcation of coal tar by partial hydrogenation in commonly referred to as visbreaking.
  • hydrogenation upgrades the quality of the coal tar whereby it is substantially comparable to a high grade crude oil stock.
  • the hydrogenation is particularly beneficial in that it frees the coal tar of oxygen, nitrogen and sulfur compounds which are undesirable'and which may poison the hydrocracking catalysts used in the refinery.
  • the coal tar of oxygen, nitrogen and sulfur compounds which are undesirable'and which may poison the hydrocracking catalysts used in the refinery.
  • preliminary hydrogenation or visbreaking is a necessary and essential adjunct in order to render coal tar suitable as a refinery stock material.
  • a 50/50 mixture of hydrogen and diluent gas using iodine as the catalyst is as effective as hydrogen when employing such typical catalysts as cobalt molybdate or nickel tungsten sulfide.
  • iodine and hydrogen exist in equilibrium with hydrogen iodide which may constitute the active catalyst.
  • the nature of the diluent gas is not critical. That is to say, mixing the hydrogen with such diverse gases as hydrogen sulfide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen, carbon dioxide and the like does not significantly effect the iodine-catalyzed hydrogenation.
  • the only requirement is that the hydrogen not fall appreciably below the 'lower limit as above spelled out.
  • reformer gas which is composed of hydrogen and carbon monoxide. It is produced by reacting coke with steam; the cost of the hydrogen in the mixture is about one-tenth that of an equivalent amount of pure hydrogen.
  • the aforesaid mixture is effective even where the hydrogen constitutes only 25% ⁇ of the hydrogenation gas.
  • iodine is not poisoned by sulfur, commonly present as hydrogen sulfide in reformer gas.
  • iodine is remarkably selective in its catalytic action as a visbreaking agent and this is another valuable aspect of the invention. Specifically, we have found that where ⁇ coal tar is visbroken using iodine as the catalyst, the oxygen-containing compounds are reduced in preference to hydrogenation of the aromatic components. Since these oxygen-containing compounds are characterized by the presence of relatively polar ether linkages, their selective reduction by the iodine catalyst lowers the viscosity of the coal tar much more effectively than the catalytic agents now in use. Thus, in comparison tests, iodine hydrogenation of coal tar results in a ratio of aromatic hydrogen to total hydrogen of 1 to 4 thereby demonstrating only slight reduction of aromatic ring systems.
  • ammonium molybdate and copper chromite typical prior art catalysts, exhibited ratios -of 1:8.5 and 1:13, respectively, indicating a high degree of aromatic ring reduction. That is to say these catalysts did not display the unusual specificity for the oxygen compounds.
  • Such preferentially catalytic activity of iodine taken together with its previously enumerated advantages make it eminently suitable as a visbreaking catalyst for converting coal tar into a high grade refinery stock material.
  • the invention can be operated in conjunction with a two-stage coal tar hydrogenation.
  • the two-stage operation is desirable in those instances where the coal tar refinery and the oil vrefinery are located in close proximity to one another.
  • a mixture of coal tar, hydrogen-containing gas, and iodine is introduced into a coal tar hydrogenator, and hydrogenation is carried out under reaction conditions as above defined.
  • the resulting visbroken tar which is now a owable, oily liquid is conveyed from the hydrogenator to a separator station where oli gases are removed and aqueous waste liquors separated out and discarded.
  • the oil is next piped to a hydrogenator where the secondstage hydrogenation is carried out with other catalysts, eg., nickel tungsten sulfide, cobalt molybdate or the like.
  • the second-stage hydrogenation removes residual nitrogen as ammonia, oxygen as water, sulfur as hydrogen sulfide and any iodine which may be present in the form of an organic iodide.
  • the products from the oil hydrogenator are conducted to a receiver from which the contaminant free oil is removed. Of gases from the receiver and the visbreaker are led to a scrubber where carbon dioxide and iodine are removed. From the scrubber the off gas is led to an absorber station where high Btu and LP gases are taken off, while the purified hydrogen passes into the char stripper.
  • the charge to the stripper is composed of bottoms from the visbreaker.
  • iodine is stripped from tar solids and off gas at both the visbreaker and hydrogenator units.
  • the net iodine consumption is less than .5% based on the weight of the charge.
  • the autoclave was pressurized to 3200 p.s.i. with a gas mixture consisting of 50 mol percent hydrogen and 50 mol percent carbon monoxide, and was heated rapidly to 740 F. This temperature was ymaintained for three hours, during which time the maximum pressure in the bomb reached 4500 p.s.i. but dropped gradually to 4000 p.s.i. At the end of the heating period, the reactor was cooled, depressurized and emptied.
  • the reactor products were filtered and 87 weight percent of oil, based on the dry, solids-free tar, were recovered along with 3.7 weight percent of solids including the catalyst.
  • the viscosity of the oil was lowered from about 100,000 to less than 100 centipoises.
  • the yield of hydrogenated oil was as high as that obtained when this same tar was hydrogenated with iodine or cobalt molybdate catalyst and 100% hydrogen.
  • a process for visbreaking coal tar comprising hydrogenating the coal tar at elevated pressures and temperatures in the presence of an iodine catalyst while using as the hydrogenating gas a mixture of hydrogen and diluent gas in a mol percent ratio rof from about 25 mol percent: mol percent to about 75 mol percentz25 mol percent and recovering the visbroken coal tar.

Description

July 1, 1969 D. FRIEDMAN ETAL HYDROGENATION'LOF COAL TAR Filed Nov. :asl 196e United States Patent O 3,453,202 HYDROGENATION F COAL TAR Louis D. Friedman, New Brunswick, and Ralph Tracy Eddinger, Princeton Junction, NJ., assignors to FMC Corporation, New York, N.Y., a corporation of Delaware Filed Nov. 28, 1966, Ser. No. 597,370 Int. Cl. Cg 23/ 02, 1/06; C10c 1/00 U.S. Cl. 208-40 6 Claims This invention resulted from work done under Contract 14-01-0001-235 with the Oflice of Coal Research in the Department of the Interior, entered into pursuant to the Act establishing the Ofice of Coal Research, 30 U.S.C. 66l-668.
This invention relates to improvements in the hydrogenation of coal tar and similar materials. More particularly, the invention pertains to the visbreaking of coal tar by hydrogenation in the presence of elemental iodine as the hydrogenation catalyst.
The production of gasoline and related distillate fuels from coal tar is well known and is described at length in the technical literature. In essence, the process consists in hydrogenating coal tar whereby it is converted int-o an oily liquid from which gasoline is recovered by fractional distillation.
In order to constitute a practical and economical source of gasoline, coal tar must be converted into a form suitable for processing in an oil refinery. As is well known, the modern refinery is designedprimarily to `operate with petroleum or crude oil; it cannot be operatedusing coal tar as rawv material without extensive modification in design and construction. As a consequence coal tar requires further processing in yorder tov adaptit as a refinery stock.
The method normally employed to convert coal tar into a suitable raw material capable of being used by the refinery is hydrogenation. This treatment -transforms coal tar into a relatively mobile, oily fluid which` can be easily handled and transported. Such liquefcation of coal tar by partial hydrogenation in commonly referred to as visbreaking. Aside from improving its physical form, hydrogenation upgrades the quality of the coal tar whereby it is substantially comparable to a high grade crude oil stock. The hydrogenation is particularly beneficial in that it frees the coal tar of oxygen, nitrogen and sulfur compounds which are undesirable'and which may poison the hydrocracking catalysts used in the refinery. Moreover, the
char solids normally present in coal tar can be readily removed from the liquefied material. A still further benefit derived from initial hydrogenation is that easily cracked cyclic hydrocarbons in the coal tarnotorious in causing fouling of catalyst bed-are -transformed into more stable naphthenic systems. l'
Manifestly, preliminary hydrogenation or visbreaking is a necessary and essential adjunct in order to render coal tar suitable as a refinery stock material.
Although visbreaking converts coal tar into a usable refinery feed, the process is not entirely satisfactoryas now practiced. For instance, the catalyst systemcom monly a metal sulfide or molybdate suspended on metal grid-is subject to clogging by the suspended char particles contained in the coal tar. Catalyst poisoning is another serious and vexing problem. This results in the need for catalyst regeneration with consequent loss of time. Other problems of a lesser nature also plague the art.
It has now been discovered that the problems attendant the visbreaking of coal tar can be greatly diminished by conducting the process in the presence of a homogeneous catalyst system wherein the catalyst is elemental iodine or hydrogen iodide formed by reaction of hydrogen with iodine and the provision of such a process constitutes the principle object and purpose of the invention. Other objects and purposes will become manifest subsequently.
In carrying out the process of the invention, generally excellent results are achieved by conducting the iodine catalyzed visbreaking at pressures from about 500 lb./sq. in. to about 5,000 lb./sq. in., preferably in the neighborhood of 1,000 to 3,000 lb./sq. in. The temperature is usually held to the range of 700 F. to 900 F., preferably of the order or 740 F. to 840 F. Although the amount of iodine catalyst is not critical, it should be used sparingly in the interest of good economics. In this connection we have ascertained that an iodine content of from about 0.2% to about 10.0% based on the coal tar provides a generous proportion of catalyst, -while for practical purposes a range of from about 0.6% to about 1.0% is preferred.
It has also been discovered that elemental iodine retains its high catalytic efiiciency even though 4the hydrogenating atmosphere contains relatively large amounts of other gases and this constitutes a further and unexpected advantage of the invention. In fact, we have ascertained that a hydrogen concentration as low as 25 mol percent does not significantly retard the catalytic action of iodine. As a consequence many waste and by-product gases which contain hydrogen can be used as a hydrogenation gas in the iodine-catalyzed visbreaking of coal tar. Normally, hydrogenation catalysts lose effectiveness when the hydrogen concentration falls below 70 mol percent; some even lose efficiency when the hydrogen content drops below .mol percent. By contrast a 50/50 mixture of hydrogen and diluent gas using iodine as the catalyst is as effective as hydrogen when employing such typical catalysts as cobalt molybdate or nickel tungsten sulfide. At the present time we have not been able to account for this singular catalytic activity of elemental iodine. Possibly, the iodine and hydrogen exist in equilibrium with hydrogen iodide which may constitute the active catalyst.
The nature of the diluent gas is not critical. That is to say, mixing the hydrogen with such diverse gases as hydrogen sulfide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen, carbon dioxide and the like does not significantly effect the iodine-catalyzed hydrogenation. The only requirement is that the hydrogen not fall appreciably below the 'lower limit as above spelled out. We have found it particularly convenient and economical to practice the invention using reformer gas which is composed of hydrogen and carbon monoxide. It is produced by reacting coke with steam; the cost of the hydrogen in the mixture is about one-tenth that of an equivalent amount of pure hydrogen. The aforesaid mixture is effective even where the hydrogen constitutes only 25% `of the hydrogenation gas. Moreover, iodine is not poisoned by sulfur, commonly present as hydrogen sulfide in reformer gas.
As a consequence it becomes possible touse waste gases such as steam-hydrocarbon reformer gases as the hydrogenating medium. The present invention thus makes available to the art the advantages and benefits attendant the use of iodine as a visbreaking catalyst While at the same time eliminating the usual economical drawbacks of this efficient albeit expensive catalytic agent.
It has been further ascertained that iodine is remarkably selective in its catalytic action as a visbreaking agent and this is another valuable aspect of the invention. Specifically, we have found that where `coal tar is visbroken using iodine as the catalyst, the oxygen-containing compounds are reduced in preference to hydrogenation of the aromatic components. Since these oxygen-containing compounds are characterized by the presence of relatively polar ether linkages, their selective reduction by the iodine catalyst lowers the viscosity of the coal tar much more effectively than the catalytic agents now in use. Thus, in comparison tests, iodine hydrogenation of coal tar results in a ratio of aromatic hydrogen to total hydrogen of 1 to 4 thereby demonstrating only slight reduction of aromatic ring systems. On the other hand, ammonium molybdate and copper chromite, typical prior art catalysts, exhibited ratios -of 1:8.5 and 1:13, respectively, indicating a high degree of aromatic ring reduction. That is to say these catalysts did not display the unusual specificity for the oxygen compounds. Such preferentially catalytic activity of iodine taken together with its previously enumerated advantages make it eminently suitable as a visbreaking catalyst for converting coal tar into a high grade refinery stock material.
Although an independent and separate process, the invention can be operated in conjunction with a two-stage coal tar hydrogenation. In fact the two-stage operation is desirable in those instances where the coal tar refinery and the oil vrefinery are located in close proximity to one another. In this combined operation of the invention, which is illustrated by the block diagram in the attached drawing, a mixture of coal tar, hydrogen-containing gas, and iodine is introduced into a coal tar hydrogenator, and hydrogenation is carried out under reaction conditions as above defined. The resulting visbroken tar which is now a owable, oily liquid is conveyed from the hydrogenator to a separator station where oli gases are removed and aqueous waste liquors separated out and discarded. The oil is next piped to a hydrogenator where the secondstage hydrogenation is carried out with other catalysts, eg., nickel tungsten sulfide, cobalt molybdate or the like. The second-stage hydrogenation removes residual nitrogen as ammonia, oxygen as water, sulfur as hydrogen sulfide and any iodine which may be present in the form of an organic iodide. The products from the oil hydrogenator are conducted to a receiver from which the contaminant free oil is removed. Of gases from the receiver and the visbreaker are led to a scrubber where carbon dioxide and iodine are removed. From the scrubber the off gas is led to an absorber station where high Btu and LP gases are taken off, while the purified hydrogen passes into the char stripper. The charge to the stripper is composed of bottoms from the visbreaker.
By operating in accordance with the aforedelineated procedure, iodine is stripped from tar solids and off gas at both the visbreaker and hydrogenator units. By recovering iodine from the waste liquor the net iodine consumption is less than .5% based on the weight of the charge.
The invention is illustrated in greater detail by the following non-limiting example.
Example One hundred grams of low temperature tar, obtained from the pyrolysis of a Wyoming subbituminous B coal in a iiuidized bed, was charged to a 300 cc. autoclave along with 2.0 grams of sublimed iodine. The autoclave was pressurized to 3200 p.s.i. with a gas mixture consisting of 50 mol percent hydrogen and 50 mol percent carbon monoxide, and was heated rapidly to 740 F. This temperature was ymaintained for three hours, during which time the maximum pressure in the bomb reached 4500 p.s.i. but dropped gradually to 4000 p.s.i. At the end of the heating period, the reactor was cooled, depressurized and emptied. The reactor products were filtered and 87 weight percent of oil, based on the dry, solids-free tar, were recovered along with 3.7 weight percent of solids including the catalyst. The viscosity of the oil was lowered from about 100,000 to less than 100 centipoises. The yield of hydrogenated oil was as high as that obtained when this same tar was hydrogenated with iodine or cobalt molybdate catalyst and 100% hydrogen.
As will be apparent to those skilled in the art numerous modifications and variations of the embodiments illustrated herein may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention or the scope of the appended claims.
What is claimed is:
1. A process for visbreaking coal tar comprising hydrogenating the coal tar at elevated pressures and temperatures in the presence of an iodine catalyst while using as the hydrogenating gas a mixture of hydrogen and diluent gas in a mol percent ratio rof from about 25 mol percent: mol percent to about 75 mol percentz25 mol percent and recovering the visbroken coal tar.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein the diluent gas is carbon monoxide.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein the diluent gas is reformer gas.
4. The process of claim 1 wherein pressure is 1,000 to 3,000 lb./sq. in. of hydrogen.
5. The process of claim 1 wherein the temperature is 700 F. to 900 F.
6. The process of claim 1 wherein the hydrogenating gas is a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide in a 50:50 mol percent ratio.
References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,348,832 5/1944 Mauch 208-40 2,847,359 8/1958 Beuther et al. 208-40 2,850,436 9/ 1958 Beuther et al. 208--40 2,974,107 3/1961 Mertens 20S-40 DELBERT E. GANTZ, Primary Examiner.
V. OKEEFE, Assistant Examiner.
U.S. Cl. X.R. 208-10, 44
'gg UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE CERTIFICATE 0F CORRECTION Patent No. 3 L*53, 202 Dated July lL 1969 Invencods) Louj S D. Friedman and Ralph T. Eddiger It is certified that error appears in the above-identified patent and that said Letters Patent are hereby corrected as shown below:
Column 3, line lil "5%" should read "0.05%" in the patent.
Silm Am) SEALED JAN 6 -4970 (SEAL) Attest:
Edward M. Fletcher, Jr. WILLIAM E. SHUYIIER, JR. nesting Officer Oommisioner ot Patents

Claims (1)

1. A PROCESS FOR VISBREAKING COAL TAR COMPRISING HYDROGENATING THE COAL TAR AT ELEVATED PRESSURES AND TEMPERATURES IN THE PRESENCE OF AN IODINE CATALYST WHILE USING AS THE HYDROGENATING GAS A MIXTURE OF HYDROGEN AND DILUENT GAS IN A MOL PERCENT RATIO OF FROM ABOUT 25 MOL PERCENT: 75 MOL PERCENT TO ABOUT 75 MOL PERCENT; 25 MOL PERCENT AND RECOVERING THE VISBROKEN COAL TAR.
US597370A 1966-11-28 1966-11-28 Hydrogenation of coal tar Expired - Lifetime US3453202A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US59737066A 1966-11-28 1966-11-28

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3453202A true US3453202A (en) 1969-07-01

Family

ID=24391226

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US597370A Expired - Lifetime US3453202A (en) 1966-11-28 1966-11-28 Hydrogenation of coal tar

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3453202A (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3944480A (en) * 1974-03-29 1976-03-16 Schroeder Wilburn C Production of oil and high Btu gas from coal
US4101416A (en) * 1976-06-25 1978-07-18 Occidental Petroleum Corporation Process for hydrogenation of hydrocarbon tars
US4909923A (en) * 1984-06-22 1990-03-20 Nippon Steel Chemical Co., Ltd. Method for hydrogenation of coal tar pitch
US5097082A (en) * 1990-06-05 1992-03-17 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Production of saturated halohydrocarbons
US5208396A (en) * 1990-06-05 1993-05-04 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Production of saturated halohydrocarbons
WO2008028459A1 (en) * 2006-09-06 2008-03-13 Studiengesellschaft Kohle Mbh Solvent-free hydrogenation/hydrogenolysis of highly carbonised coals with borane and iodo catalysts

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2348832A (en) * 1938-04-19 1944-05-16 Mauch Karl Process for treating bituminous substances
US2847359A (en) * 1953-07-02 1958-08-12 Gulf Research Development Co Petroleum pitch and process for its manufacture
US2850436A (en) * 1954-03-16 1958-09-02 Gulf Research Development Co Method for the preparation of solid petroleum pitch
US2974107A (en) * 1959-01-27 1961-03-07 California Research Corp Preparation of quick-breaking bituminous emulsions characterized by improved demulsibility

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2348832A (en) * 1938-04-19 1944-05-16 Mauch Karl Process for treating bituminous substances
US2847359A (en) * 1953-07-02 1958-08-12 Gulf Research Development Co Petroleum pitch and process for its manufacture
US2850436A (en) * 1954-03-16 1958-09-02 Gulf Research Development Co Method for the preparation of solid petroleum pitch
US2974107A (en) * 1959-01-27 1961-03-07 California Research Corp Preparation of quick-breaking bituminous emulsions characterized by improved demulsibility

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3944480A (en) * 1974-03-29 1976-03-16 Schroeder Wilburn C Production of oil and high Btu gas from coal
US4101416A (en) * 1976-06-25 1978-07-18 Occidental Petroleum Corporation Process for hydrogenation of hydrocarbon tars
US4909923A (en) * 1984-06-22 1990-03-20 Nippon Steel Chemical Co., Ltd. Method for hydrogenation of coal tar pitch
US5097082A (en) * 1990-06-05 1992-03-17 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Production of saturated halohydrocarbons
US5208396A (en) * 1990-06-05 1993-05-04 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Production of saturated halohydrocarbons
WO2008028459A1 (en) * 2006-09-06 2008-03-13 Studiengesellschaft Kohle Mbh Solvent-free hydrogenation/hydrogenolysis of highly carbonised coals with borane and iodo catalysts

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3030297A (en) Hydrogenation of coal
CA1124194A (en) Hydrocracking of heavy oils/fly ash slurries
CA1072898A (en) Coal liquefaction process
US3755137A (en) Multi-stage ebullated bed coal-oil hydrogenation and hydrocracking process
US3532617A (en) Hydroconversion of coal with combination of catalysts
US3155608A (en) Process for reducing metals content of catalytic cracking feedstock
US3025231A (en) Catalytic hydrogenation of heavy oils such as shale oil
US3796650A (en) Coal liquefaction process
US1932174A (en) Production of valuable hydrocarbons
US3143489A (en) Process for making liquid fuels from coal
GB1418014A (en) Coal-conversion process
US3453202A (en) Hydrogenation of coal tar
US2654695A (en) Process for preparing liquid hydrocarbon fuel from coal
US3594305A (en) Process for hydrogenation of coal
US2738311A (en) Coal hydrogenation process
US3732085A (en) Thermally efficient nonpolluting system for production of substitute natural gas
US3152981A (en) Hydrogenation process employing hydrogen absorbed by the feed
US3542665A (en) Process of converting coal to liquid products
US3172836A (en) Hydrocarbon conversion process
US2814588A (en) Purification of petroleum coke
US3617474A (en) Low sulfur fuel oil from coal
US1931550A (en) Conversion of solid fuels and products derived therefrom or other materials into valuable liquids
US2574446A (en) Catalytic desulfurization of gas oilkerosene mixtures
US2100352A (en) Catalytic reaction
US4696733A (en) Process for selectively hydrogenating polycondensed aromatics