Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3455268 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateJul 15, 1969
Filing dateOct 13, 1966
Priority dateOct 13, 1966
Publication numberUS 3455268 A, US 3455268A, US-A-3455268, US3455268 A, US3455268A
InventorsGordon Samuel J
Original AssigneeGordon Samuel J
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Nonsymmetric shroud-propeller combination for directional control
US 3455268 A
Abstract  available in
Images(2)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

July 15, 1969 5. J. GORDON 3,

NONSYMMETRIC SHROUD-PROPELLER COMBINATION FOR DIRECTIONAL CONTROL 2 Sheets-Sheet 1 Filed Oct. 15, 1966 IINVEINTOR. SAMUEL J. GORDON ATTORNEY 5. J. GORD N 3,455,268

0 NONSYMMETRIC SHROUD-PROPELLER COMBINATION FOR DIRECTIONAL CONTROL I 2 Sheets-Sheet 2 July 15, 1969 Filed Oct. 15. 1966 ST'FRl/VG CONTR INVENTOR SAM UE L J. G ORDON United States Patent 01 3,455,268 Patented July 15, 1969 U.S. Cl. 1141 66 15 Claims ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE A nonaxisymmetric airfoil shroud in combination with a propeller of a water borne ship is used to provide a force radial to the axis of the shroud. The axis of the shroud is maintained parallel with the axis of the propeller shaft regardless of the circumferential position of the shroud with respect to its axis. Rotation of the shroud through 180 degrees changes the radial force direction from a maximum right to left force and thus causes the ship to turn in the same manner as by a conventional rudder. An up or down force is also available by rotation of the shroud to the appropriate position. Effective rotation of the shroud is achieved by mechanical change of the circumferential position of the nonaxisymmetry of the shroud.

This invention relates to a combination of a nonsymmetric shroud and a propeller for providing directional control of ships and other fluid borne vehicles such as ground-effect machines.

The use of shrouds in conjunction with propellers is well known as a method for improving the performance of the propeller. The shroud controls the inflow velocity of the water and consequently the pressure distribution in the vicinity of the propeller. The accelerating type of nozzle (so called Kort nozzle) or shroud shown in FIG. 1 increases the flow rate at the propeller. This flow rate increase produces a decrease in pressure in the vicinity of the propeller to a level below that which would exist if the propeller were not enclosed by the shroud. Similarly, the decelerating type of nozzle (so called pumpjet) shown in FIG. 2 decreases the flow rate and increases the pressure level at the propeller. With either type of shroud a pressure differential exists between the outer surface and the inner surface of the shroud. This pressure differential, acting on an element of arc length of the shroud, produces a radially directed force on the element. The conventional shroud is axisymmetric so that the net radial force integrated over the circumference of the shroud is zero.

However, if as in this invention the shroud is purposely designed to have a circumferential variation in its pressure differential, a substantial radial force will be developed.

It is an object of this invention to advantageously use this radially directed force in the steering of ships and other fluid borne vehicles.

It is a further object of this invention to use this radially directed force to apply a lifting or depressing force at the bow or stern of a ship or other fluid borne vehicle to control its attitude and/ or motion in the vertical plane.

It is a feature of this invention that in contrast to a conventional rudder the steering device may produce ahead thrust rather than drag when the vehicle is not turning and may continue to produce either ahead thrust or very low drag at all turning rates. It is a further feature that the invention will allow a single screw vessel to turn either to starboard or to port while backing down. Another feature is that the device will produce a side thrust whose direction does not change when the direction of the propeller stream is reversed in contrast with the necessity to reverse the rudder when reversing engines.

his a further feature of this invention that when not used primarily for steering, as in straight-ahead motion, the device 'has the additional beneficial effect of reducing the displacement of a ship in a manner similar to that of a Hydrofoil.

It is another feature of the steering device that it can provide a totally immersed vehicle, such as a submarine, with directional control in both the horizontal and vertigal planes through the movement of a single control surace.

The invention consists of one or more propeller shrouding surfaces each of which produces a net force or thrust. Each of these forces acts along a line which intersects the propeller axis. Thus each force will have a component perpendicular to the axis of the propeller or, in other words, a side thrust component. By suitably controlling the geometry of the shroud or shrouds these side thrust components can be combined in such a manner that a resultant force of a desired magnitude and direction will act upon the vehicle to control its motion.

The novel features which are believed to be characteristic of the invention together with further objects and advantages thereof, will be better understood from the following description considered in connection with the accompanying drawings in which several embodiments of the invention are illustrated by way of example.

FIGURE 1 is a cross sectional view of an axisymmetric accelerating shroud.

FIGURE 2 is a cross sectional view of an axisymmetric decelerating shroud.

FIGURE 3 is a port stern profile in partial cross section of a semicircular shroud and its positioning mechanism.

FIGURE 4 is a stern view of the shroud of FIGURE 3 showing the shroud in two positions.

FIGURES 5 and 6 are cross sectional views of nonaxisymmetric shrouds.

FIGURE 7 is a partial cross section of a variable geometry shroud.

FIGURE 8 is a perspective view of an outboard propeller fitted with a nonaxisymmetrical shroud.

Referring now to the drawings, FIGURE 1 represents, in cross section, the accelerating type of shroud 10 surrounding circumferentially a propeller 11. The mean curvature line 12 of the accelerating type shroud is convex toward the center of the shroud. As is well known from airfoil theory, the velocity of the fluid 14 in which the propeller 11 and shroud 10 are immersed will be greater along the inner surface 13 than along the outer surface 15 for a properly designed shroud having this direction of mean curvature in its airfoil cross section. The increased fluid velocity on the inside of the shroud 10 decreases the pressure level in the vicinity of the propeller 11 to a level below that which would exist if the propeller were not within the shroud 10. The accelerating shroud 10 improves the effectiveness of propellers operating under high-thrust, low fluid velocity conditions such as encountered by tugboats by absorbing some of the thrust load from the propeller and by improving the inflow conditions at the propeller so that the torque required to turn it is reduced.

A decelerating shroud 20 is shown in cross section in FIGURE 2 and is observed to have a mean line of curvature 21 which is convex outward. This configuration will cause the velocity of the fluid to be less at the inner surface 22 than at the outer surface 23 thereby causing the pressure at the propeller 11 to be higher than for an unshrouded propeller. The decelerating shroud 20 in its axisymmetric form is useful in reducing the cavitation efiects on the propeller which exist when the pressure drop across the propeller reduces the pressure of the fluid below its vapor pressure. The shrouded propeller is working in a fluid at higher pressure than an unshrouded propeller and hence the allowable pressure drop across the propeller before vapor pressure is reached is greater than for the unshrouded propeller. By eliminating cavitation losses, the decelerating shroud improves the effectiveness of the propeller.

The attack angle 16 and the shape of the shroud airfoil cross section would, in practice, be chosen to be consistent with the pressure drop design requirements While producing small turbulence of the shroud and propeller fluid streamlines 17.

The pressure dilferential across the surfaces 13, 15 of the conventional axisymmetric accelerating shroud 10 of FIGURE 1 and the pressure differential across the surfaces 22, 23 of the conventional axisymmetric decelerating shroud 20 of FIGURE 2 are not used in any direct manner. The objective in the prior art was to provide only an increase in propulsive effectiveness. For the axisymmetric shroud the force which acts radially on the shroud, due to the pressure difierential across the two surfaces, is distributed evenly over the circumference. As a consequence the net radial force produced by either the accelerating shroud 10 or the decelerating shroud 20 is zero.

It should be observed that the direction of the pressure differential is opposite for the accelerating and decelerating shrouds-a characteristic which will be utilized in certain embodiments of this invention.

Control of the shroud loading and the resulting side thrust can be accomplished in the following manner:

(I) Fixed shroud geometry with variable angular positioning In this system the shroud is constructed so that the airfoil cross section at any point on the circumference is of a given shape, however, the cross section may vary in its shape around the shroud periphery. In addition, the shroud may have any included angle of propeller encirclement up to and including 360; that is, it need not be a completely propeller-encircling shroud. By varying the position of the shroud with respect to the propeller stream by rotating it around the propeller axis, a side thrust of the desired magnitude and direction can be produced. For vehicles with more than one propeller, the side thrusts from the multiple shrouds can be combined to produce a force and/or moment of the desired magnitude and direction. Fixed shroud geometry embodiments of the invention are illustrated in FIGURES 3, 4, 5 and 6.

(II) Variable shroud geometry with fixed angular positioning In this system the shroud geometry may also be complete or incomplete in circumferentially enclosing the propeller. It consists of two concentric shrouds, one of which is rigidly attached to the ship and the other movable in respect thereto in a manner similar to a flapped airplane wing. By varying the angular relation of the movable portion with respect to the fixed portion, the loading distribution over the circumference of the shroud is varied to produce a side thrust of a desired magnitude and direction. As with the fixed shroud system, the side thrusts from multiple shrouds can be combined to produce a desired resultant force or moment on the vehicle. A variable shroud embodiment of the invention is shown in FIGURE 7.

One embodiment of the fixed shroud geometry with variable angular positioning type of steering control is shown in the two views of FIGURES 3 and 4. In particular, the shroud is semicircular, rotatable about the propeller axis, and adapted to a single screw vessel.

In this embodiment, the semicircular shroud 31 is rotatable about the propellar axis. The propeller 32 is fixed to the propeller shaft 33 which rotates Within and is supported by the propeller shaft bearing 34. The propeller shaft bearing 34 is supported by the shroud torque tube 35 which in turn rotates within the stern tube bearing 36 and stem tube 37. The stem tube 37 is fixed rigidly to the hull structure and keel 45 by its attachment to the stern post 46. Both the propeller shaft bearing 34 and the stern tube bearing 36 are fitted with packing glands 38 at their inboard ends and rope guards 39 at their outboard ends.

The shroud 31 is attached to the torque tube 35 at its outboard end by the shroud support struts 40. At the inboard end the torque tube 35 is fixed to the bull gear 41. Application of a torque to the pinion shaft 42 by a steering motor (not shown) causes the pinion 43 to rotate the bull gear 41 which in turn rotates the shroud 31 through the torque tube 35. The dunce cap 47 s rves its glnction of preventing flow separation at the propeller Rotation of the propeller 32 and motion of the ship through the water causes a flow field to be set up around the shroud 31. The flow over the shroud produces a hydrodynamic force on the shroud. For a shroud such as that illustrated in FIGURES 3 and 4, where the shroud is symmetrical about a plane containing the propeller and the shroud axis, the force lies in the plane of symmetry. This force T has both an axial component T and a radial component T Where, as illustrated, the axial component is the same direction as the propeller thrust, a significant propeller thrust augmentation will be realized as for the axisymmetric complete shroud.

When the shroud is positioned so that its plane of symmetry coincides with that of the ship, no turning force acts upon the ship, but T acts to reduce the ships displacement in a manner similar to a hydrofoil. As the shroud is rotated about the propeller axis through an angle 0, a side thrust is applied to the ship of magnitude T sin 0. This force component acts on the ship in a direction opposite to the shrouds displacement. If the shroud is displaced to starboard as shown in FIGURE 4, the force component acting to port at the stern causes the bow and the ship to swing to starboard.

It is to be noted that increasing the angular displacement of the shroud increases the magnitude of the turning force at the stern and the resultant turning moment on the ship without the very significant increase in drag that accompanies the deflection of a conventional rudder. Additionally, it is to be noted that reversing the propeller rotation does not reverse the direction of the turning force as occurs with the conventional rudder.

The magnitude of the radial or side thrust T and the axial thrust T that might reasonably be expected from a particular semicircular shroud under typical operating conditions has been calculated. The operating conditions and the shroud characteristics are given below:

Propeller diametereleven feet Ship speedtwenty knots Shaft horsepower-6000 Thrust horsepower3750 Combined propeller and shroud thrust-87,100 lbs.

Shroudsemicircular of constant chord, camber and con- For the above conditions the effect of the semicircular shroud was calculated to be:

Predicted shroud radial or side force-134,000 lbs. Predicted shroud ahead-thrust contribution4300 lbs.

The predicted performance of this shroud may be com- 5 pared with the predicted performance of a conventional spade type rudder of area equal to that of the shroud:

Predicted maximum rudder side force or lift-91,000 lbs. Predicted rudder drag at maximum lift--15,000 lbs.

The maximum lift predicted for the rudder is seen to be only 68% of that predicted for the shroud. Additionally, the rudder produces a drag of 15,000 lbs. at maximum lift while the shroud produces a thrust of 4000 lbs.

The above predicted performance capabilities of the semicircular shroud indicate that such a shroud would be a very desirable way to perform ship steering. These predicted capabilities have not been experimentally verified but a high degree of confidence that these calculated results are reasonable rests on the favorable agreement of calculated and experimental results obtained on a much smaller propeller-shroud combination. The propeller had a 6.2-inch diameter and the semicircular shroud had a length of 4.8 inches, a NACA 66-210, a=6 section profile giving a design lift coeflicient of 0.2. It had a convergence angle of 3.4 degrees.

An illustrative operating condition in the above experiments was for a simulated ship speed of 4.3 ft./s e'c., for which condition the measured thrust was 18 lbs. and the measured lift was 4.2 lbs. The calculated value for the lift was approximately 6% higher. The thrust coeflicient was 4.7 8, At lower values of speed the thrust and lift increased, with an increasing disparity between the calculated and the measured lift. However, the thrust coefiicients of 1.65 and 4.78 for the different propeller-shroud combinations lead one to conclude from an examination of the speed versus thrust coefficient curve for the small propeller, that a comparable percentage error in lift will occur for the large propeller-shroud combination if it is assumed that the usual scaling allowed when using the thrust coefficient is valid.

Although the lift was only a small fraction of the thrust for the small propeller-shroud combination, the particular shroud used had a low lift coefficient. It is expected that lift will vary nearly linearly with lift coetficient so that forces on the order of five times those observed in the experiments would have been realized with a lift coefficient of 1.0.

The experiments showed that the gain in propeller thrust from the shroud was just enough to counter the additional appendage drag of the shroud; however, the torque and power requirements were reduced by an average of with the shroud in place.

A number of experiments were made with the propeller rotation and apparatus motion in reverse. Because of test equipment limitations, these runs were made somewhat gingerly at low propeller rpm, and simulated ship speed. Observed vertical forces were small, all around one pound, but all in the upward direction. This indicated that, as expected, the steering force would be in the same direction for a given shroud position with a ship proceeding either ahead or astern.

The resultant forces acting on the shroud-propeller system should be largely independent of small changes in the axial positioning of the propeller within the shroud. The calculations for the large propeller-shroud combination were made for the case where the propeller is located axially in the center of the shroud.

The clearance between the shroud and the propeller tips should be kept as small as practical so as to control the turbulence level at the interface between the propeller tips and the shroud.

The non-symmetrical shroud of FIGURES 3 and 4 had a constant airfoil cross section and encompassed one-half the circumference of the propeller. It is apparent that the circumferential enclosure of the propeller can be increased or decreased from a semicircle depending upon whether more or less axisymmetric shroud characteristics are desired for a particular application. It is also apparent that the shroud could be constructed with an airfoil cross section which is not constant.

An example of a non-symmetrical shroud which completely encloses the propeller circumferentially is shown in cross section in FIGURE 5. A net radial force is produced by the shroud since the force acting inwardly on the smaler cross section 51 is less than tht acting inwardly on the larger cross section 52. The cross section can be designed to decrease in any manner desired as one progresses from the larger to the smaller cross section around the periphery of the shroud. The shroud 50 could be substituted for the semicircular shroud 31 of FIGURE 3 and rotated in the same manner to provide directional or attitued control. It is apparent size of the airfold is not the only available variable in the non-symmetric shroud. The airfoil section and the convergence angle of the nose-tail line may also vary according to the cirmumferential position of the section.

Another embodiment of a circular non-symmetric shroud is shown in cross section in FIGURE 6. It is seen that shroud 60 has a decelerating airfoil section 61 with a dimetrically opposite accelerating section 62. A smooth transition from decelerating to accelerating sections is made along the shroud circumference. The outward force 63 of the decelerating portion of the shroud 60 acts in concert with the inwardly directed force 64 of the accelerating portion of the shroud to provide a greater side or radial force than could be obtained from a semicircular shroud of either the accelerating or the decelerating type. In addition to this desirable feature, the shroud 60 configuration is believed to be particularly suitable for use with large diameter propellers even when the shroud 60 is nonrotatably attached to stern of the ship with its accelerating section 62 at the greatest depth. When shroud 60 is so positioned it improves the performance of the large diameter propeller more perfectly matching its characteristics to the different loading presented by the water over the depth of the propeller diameter. Since water pressure increases /2 lb. per foot of depth, the pressure difference can be substantial. A propeller design which is good for the greatest depth will probably produce cavitation at the smallest depth. However, if a propeller is used with the shroud 60 having its accelerating portions at the greatest depth, cavitation will be a lesser problem because of the decelerating section 61 at the smallest depth and a better performance at the greatest depth will be provided by the accelerating section 62.

An embodiment of this invention employing variable shroud geometry with fixed angular positioning is shown in partial cross section in FIGURE 7. The complete shroud consists of two separate circular shrouds 71, 72 each of which in cross section is only a portion of a complete airfoil. The positioning of shroud 72 with respect to shroud 71 is adjustable so as to provide control of the magnitude and direction of the side thrust developed. This embodiment is adapted to control of a submarine 73.

In the embodiment of FIGURE 7, the complete shroud consists of a forward fixed ring 71 and an after movable ring 72. The forward ring 71 is attached to the hull structure 73 by rigid support struts 74. The after ring 72 is supported and positioned by four equiangularly spaced linear actuators 75 which are enclosed in the shroud structure. These actuators are attached to the forward ring 71 at their forward ends by rigid mountings and attached to the after ring 72 at their after ends by ball joints 76. The ball joints 76 allow the after ring 72 to vary in its alignment with the forward ring.

By extending one actuator and retracting the actuator diametrically opposite to it by changing the fluid pressure in pipes 77 in response to a signal to the steering control 78, the after ring 72 is canted with respect to the forward ring 71 thus altering the configuration of the shroud from its normal axisymmetric cross section. As a result of the canting, a net side thrust is produced which acts radially in the plane of the extended actuators. The magnitude of the side thrust is determined by the angular displacement of the axes of the forward and after rings.

If the second diammetric pair of actuators is deflected concurrently With the first pair, a component of side thrust will be produced which is perpendicular to the component generated by deflection of the first pair. The net side thrust will be the vector sum of the two components. It is thus possible by proper positioning of the four actuators to develop a side thrust of a desired magnitude which acts in any desired direction.

An embodiment of the non-symmetrical shroud wherein it is used only to provide an upwardly directed force and is not made rotatable about the propeller axis is shown in FIGURE 8. An outboard drive 80 is shown attached to the transom 81 of a boat. The outboard drive 80, or an outboard motor, is caused to steer the boat by rotating the propeller 82 in a horizontal plane about the vertical axis 83 and no rudder is necessary. However, boats which use outboard drives or motor have a tendency when under way to have an attitude in which the bow is much higher than the stern thereby greatly reducing the performance capabilities of the boat. This tendency to bow plane prevents the realization of the full speed capability of the hull form and is an inefficient use of engine power. The attitude of the boat can be greatly imp-roved by applying an upward force substantially along the vertical axis 83 as by the semicircular shroud 84. The shroud 84 is attached by a support 85 to a rotatable housing 86 to which is also attached a mount for the propeller 82. Thus when housing 86 is rotated both the propeller 82 and the concentric semicircular shroud 84 also rotate. In this way the shroud always acts to assist the propeller as with a thrust increase and is continuously providing and upward force which would act to keep the bow down to a more favorable boat attitude.

The embodiments of the invention disclosed in the foregoing specification are illustrative of the application of the stated principles of operation and systems of control. These embodiments are not to be considered as indicative of the complete range of application of the invention and many modifications employing these inventive concepts will occur to those skilled in the art.

What is claimed is:

1. The combination of a fluid borne vehicle, a propulsion propeller carried by said vehicle for reacting with said fluid, and a shroud of the accelerating type encircling only the lower portion of said propeller and maintained in coaxial arrangement with said propeller, said propeller being located in proximity to the center of the lengthwise dimension of said shroud.

2. The combination of claim 1 in further combination with means for rotating said propeller and said shroud together in fixed relationship about a substantially vertical axis.

3. A combined hydrodynamic propulsion and steering appaartus for a water borne ship comprising,

a propulsion propeller attached to said ship for reacting with said water to provide a propulsive force in the direction of the length of said ship,

a non-axisymmetric shroud having an airfoil crosssection rotatably attached to said ship,

the axis of rotation of said shroud being coincident with the axis of rotation of said propeller,

said axes being substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis of said ship,

said propeller being in proximity to said shroud to propel water through said shroud,

the direction of water flow entering and leaving said shroud being in substantially the same direction and substantially parallel to the axis of said shroud,

a net radial force being exerted on said shroud by said flow of water because of the non-axisymmetric airfoil shape of said shroud, said radial force being substantially transverse to the direction of water flow,

means for rotating said shroud about its axis to change the direction of said radial force with respect to said ship,

said rotating means being capable of rotating said shroud through a substantial angle so that sufficient radial force can be directed to starboard or port of the ship to turn said ship,

said shroud being located near the stern of said ship to provide effective steering for said ship.

4. The apparatus of claim 3 wherein said propeller is at least partially within the leading and the trailing edge of said shroud.

5. The apparatus of claim 3 wherein the maximum angle of rotation is at least substantially 180 degrees so that maximum radial force can be exerted by the shroud to starboard or port on the ship.

6. The apparatus of claim 3 wherein the maximum angle of rotation is at least substantially 360 degrees so that the shroud may exert upward and downward forces on the stern of said ship as well as sideward forces.

7. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein the non-axisymmetric shroud is substantially semicircular and of substantially uniform airfoil cross section of the accelerating type.

8. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein the non-axisymmetric shroud is a complete circular shroud having an accelerating region and a diametrically opposite decelerating region, said accelerating and decelerating regions being joined to each other to form the circumference of the complete shroud.

9. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the accelerating and decelerating portions are joined by a smoothly varying accelerating to decelerating portion, each accelerating and decelerating portion being substantially one-half the circumference of the complete shroud.

10. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein the non-axisymmetric shroud is a complete circular shroud of airfoil cross-section, the size of the cross-sectional area of said shroud at one region being substantially greater than the cross-sectional area of said shroud at a diametrically opposite region, the cross-sectional area of the shroud intermediate these regions being smoothly varying.

11. The shroud of claim 10 where said airfoil crosssection is of the accelerating type.

12. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein the non-axisymrnetric shroud is substantially semicircular and of substantially uniform airfoil cross section of the decelerating type.

13. The apparatus of claim 3 wherein said propeller is located in proximity to the center of the lengthwise dimension of said shroud.

14. The combination of a fluid borne vehicle, a propulsion propeller carried by said vehicle for reacting with said fluid, and a non-axisymmetric shroud around said propeller and maintained in coaxial arrangement with said propeller, said propeller being located in proximity to the center of the lengthwise dimension of said shroud.

15. The combination of claim 14 in further combination with means for rotating said propeller and said shroud together in fixed relationship about a substantially vertical axis.

References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,519,580 12/1924 Gill 60-232 XR 2,510,561 6/1950 De Laval 60232 XR 2,693,920 11/1954 Taylor 244-15 3,115,112 12/1963 Erlbacher 114166 3,244,135 4/1966 Meyerhoff 1l4-166 3,099,240 7/1963 Montague 11466.5

ANDREW H. FARRELL, Primary Examiner US. Cl. X.R.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1519580 *Nov 12, 1923Dec 16, 1924Gill Propeller Company LtdManeuvering or steering of ships and other vessels
US2510561 *Jul 22, 1944Jun 6, 1950Lockheed Aircraft CorpAirplane control surface
US2693920 *Dec 17, 1951Nov 9, 1954Gilbert Taylor ClarenceAdjustable lift-propulsion device for aircraft
US3099240 *May 24, 1961Jul 30, 1963Jr Charles A MontagueBoat construction
US3115112 *May 4, 1961Dec 24, 1963Erlbacher Robert WTubular rudder with relief means
US3244135 *Jun 16, 1964Apr 5, 1966Eastern Res GroupDevice for controlling ship movement
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3675424 *May 18, 1970Jul 11, 1972Lips NvNozzle for ship{40 s propeller with water ejection along the trailing edge of the nozzle
US3738307 *Jun 3, 1971Jun 12, 1973Strommen Straal Strommen RaufoPropeller nozzle
US4327469 *Mar 10, 1980May 4, 1982Mitsui Engineering And Shipbuilding Co., Ltd.Method for mounting ring-shaped construction on ship stern
US4957458 *Feb 28, 1989Sep 18, 1990Lips B.V.Flow guiding face(s) for a ship
US5620153 *Mar 20, 1995Apr 15, 1997Ginsberg; Harold M.Light aircraft with inflatable parachute wing propelled by a ducted propeller
US5722866 *Mar 2, 1993Mar 3, 1998Brandt; LennartPropulsion arrangement for a marine vessel
US6986689Jul 22, 2004Jan 17, 2006EnviropropcorporationSystem and apparatus for improving safety and thrust from a hydro-drive device
US7229331Jan 23, 2006Jun 12, 2007Enviroprop CorporationShroud for a hydro thrust device
US7267589Jan 17, 2006Sep 11, 2007Enviroprop CorporationSystem and apparatus for improving safety and thrust from a hydro-drive device
US7335074 *Jun 21, 2005Feb 26, 2008Howard ArnesonShroud enclosed inverted surface piercing propeller outdrive
US7854637 *Jun 12, 2006Dec 21, 2010Marine Propulsion Technologies, Inc.Multiple venturi nozzle system for watercraft
US8123578 *Mar 7, 2009Feb 28, 2012Becker Marine Systems Gmbh & Co.Device for reducing the power demand for the propulsion of a ship
US8403715Dec 6, 2011Mar 26, 2013Howard M. ArnesonMarine jet drive
US8430703Jul 30, 2008Apr 30, 2013Becker Marine Systems Gmbh & Co. KgDevice for reducing the drive power requirement of a ship
US20120083172 *Oct 5, 2010Apr 5, 2012Al Babtain Ahmed Abdulrahman AAuxiliary marine vessel propulsion system
CN101282874BJun 12, 2006Dec 8, 2010船用推进技术公司Multiple nozzle venturi system for watercraft
WO2007005209A2 *Jun 12, 2006Jan 11, 2007Wilderich C SchultzMultiple nozzle venturi system for watercraft
Classifications
U.S. Classification114/166, 416/189, 114/271, 440/67, 60/221
International ClassificationB63H25/06, B63H25/38
Cooperative ClassificationB63H25/38
European ClassificationB63H25/38