|Publication number||US3455788 A|
|Publication date||Jul 15, 1969|
|Filing date||Nov 15, 1966|
|Priority date||Nov 15, 1966|
|Publication number||US 3455788 A, US 3455788A, US-A-3455788, US3455788 A, US3455788A|
|Inventors||Janet C Curry, Wilton V Dudley|
|Original Assignee||Lever Brothers Ltd|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (4), Referenced by (28), Classifications (10)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
July 15, 1969 Y J, ETAL 3,455,788
MULTIPLE INOGULATION DEVICE Filed Nov. 15, 1966 INVENTORS JANET C. CURRY a WILTON V. DUDLEY iheir ATTORNEYS United States Patent 3,455,788 MULTIPLE INOCULATION DEVICE Janet C. Curry, Palisade, and Wilton V. Dudley, Paramus, N.J., assignors to Lever Brothers Company, New York, N .Y., a corporation of Maine Filed Nov. 15, 1966, Ser. No. 594,493 Int. Cl. C12b 1/02; B65d 1/24 US. Cl. 195-139 6 Claims ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE This invention relates to improvements in an apparatus for simultanetously streak inoculating a substrate with a plurality of microbial cultures. The apparatus consists essentially of an inoculum block containing a plurality of small receptacles adapted to hold suspensions of microbial cultures, and an applicator unit composed of a plurality of applicator elements attached to a holder with a handle and insertable in the receptacles in the inoculum block.
This invention relates to improvements in an apparatus for simultaneously streak inoculating a substrate, such as an agar gradient plate, with a plurality of microbial cultures.
The utilization of traditional techniques in screening antimicrobial compounds to determine their effectiveness has demonstrated how difiicult it is to attain an adequate screening standard. The reasons for this difliculty are thought to be the considerable amount of equipment, time and space which are necessary to test the response of each microbial organism to the anti-microbial compound being tested. In small laboratories, screening may necessarily be confined to one or two well-known test organisms, such as Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. The limited amount of information derived from these tests is inadequate in many instances to predict the realistic activity of an antimicrobial compound under normal conditions of use.
Considerably more screening information can be acquired by using a gradient plate screening procedure based on a method reported by W. Szybolski in Science 116: 4648 (1952). A square phage-typing dish is placed on an inclined platform so that a base layer of agar can harden on it in the form of a wedge. A second layer of agar containing the germicide is hardened with the plate in a level position. A concentration gradient is formed as the base layer is diluted by diffusion from the second layer. The phage-typing dish with the two diffused layers of agar constitutes the gradient plate. Streak inoculation of the surface of the two layers results in the development of a growth front which is a function of the MEC (minimum effective concentration). Assuming linearity, the length of the area showing heavy growth is measured with MEC values calculated by direct proportion.
An object of the present invention is to provide an apparatus with which multiple streak inoculations of microbial culture suspensions can be applied simultaneously and rapidly to a substrate to increase the spectrum of culture growths available for comparison.
Referring to FIGURE 1 of the single sheet of drawings, the apparatus of the present invention consists essentially of an inoculum block 10 and an applicator unit 11 with a handle 12. The inoculum block 10 may be constructed of metal, glass or some similar material. Aluminum is preferred because of its light weight and ease of sterilization after each use. The block 10 contains a plurality of small receptacles or wells 13 adapted to hold suspensions of the microbial cultures to be applied to a substrate, such as an agar gradient plate or some other surface suitable for screening antimicrobial com-pounds.
The applicator unit 11 is composed of a plurality of applicator elements 16, such as small brushes, with the same number of elements 16 as there are receptacles 13 in the inoculum block 10. The applicator elements 16 are arranged linearly and fastened to a holder 17, preferably by inserting them into small holes 18 in the holder 17. They may be fastened permanently, or be detachable for ease of sterilization. The holder 17 is preferably constructed of the same material as the inoculum block 10, but any suitable material can be used. The holder 17 is fitted with a handle 12 with which the applicator unit 11 is manipulated. The applicator elements 16 are so positioned on-the holder 17 that they can be inserted simultaneously into the receptacles 13 to adsorb specimens of the microbial cultures contained in the receptacles 13.
FIGURE 2 illustrates the manner of using the apparatus of this invention to inoculate a gradient plate substrate 26. In FIGURE 2, the applicator elements 16 are drawn across a substrate 26 contained in a phage-typing dish 24 to inoculate the substrate 26 by depositing thereon specimens of individual microbial cultures as streaks 25.
In the preferred embodiment, the applicator elements are positioned near one edge of the holder 17. The opposite edge 23 may then rest upon a flat surface and the holder 17 will act as a support for the elements 16 when not in use by holding them away from contact with contaminating objects. When a square phage-typing dish with raised sides 24 is used to contain a gradient plate substrate 26, the applicator elements are moved along the substrate 26 without edge 23 touching the same, in a linear direction and deposit the desired amount of inoculum in streaks 25 along the substrate 26. Manipulation of the holder 17 permits the application of controlled, equalized pressure on the applicator elements 16, resulting in a plurality of straight streak inoculations 25 of approximately the same width.
In the preferred embodiment, the inoculum block 10 contains a plurality of small guide channels 22 that are equal in number to the receptacles 13. The channels 22 are positioned on the upward face of the block 10 and lead from one end of the receptacles 13 to the near edge of the block 10. The depth of the channels 22 will depend on the size of the applicator elements 16 being used. Channels of approximately A; inch depth are preferred for use with small brushes.
The guide channels 22 are particularly helpful in preventing contamination of the applicator elements 16 and the inocula contained in the receptacles 13, when the elements 16 are inserted into or withdrawn from the receptacles 13. The channels 22 also serve as an obvious guide to the elements 16 when inserting them into the receptacles 13, and assist in removing excess microbial culture suspension from the elements 16 when the elements 16 are withdrawn along the channels 22 from the receptacles 13. The excess of each microbial culture suspension remains either in its receptacle 13 or channel 22, and cannot contaminate the other cultures. The channels 22 also act as rest supports for the elements 16 when not in use.
The spacing 14 of the receptacles 13 in the inoculum block 10 and the spacing 21 of the applicator elements 16 on the holder 17 depend upon several important considerations. If the streak inoculations 25 are placed too closely to each other on the gradient plate, the individual microbial growth fronts tend to merge into each other, making them indistinguishable and difiicult to measure. If the applicator elements 16 are so positioned on the holder 17 that they can at any time come in contact with each other, the possibility exists that an element 16 may become contaminated with microbial cultures from an adjacent element 16. It is therefore important that the dis tance 21 between the applicator elements 16 and the distance 14 between the individual receptacles 13 be sufficiently large that no likelihood of contamination exists and that no merging of parallel microbial colony strips on the substrate 26 "vcurs.
The number i receptacles 13 and applicator elements 16 can be varied according to the width of the substrate and the distance desired between each parallel inoculation. The width of the receptacles 15 can be varied according to the size and spacing of the applicator elements 16, so that the applicator elements 16 can be inserted simultaneously with ease. The length 19 and depth 20 of the receptacles 13 can also be varied according to the amount of microbial culture suspension to be held by each receptacle 13.
-If the standard, square phage-typing dish is used to contain a gradient plate substrate, the width of the dish is appropriate for a maximum of 12 streak inoculations using 12 applicator elements of equal size. Under these conditions the likelihood of contamination of the microbial cultures is very low.
In the preferred apparatus for inoculating a substrate in a phage-typing dish, the inoculum block contains 12 receptacles, each of approximately inch width, inch length, and /1 inch depth. They are evenly spaced and approximately ,5 inch apart on the upward face of the inoculum block. The applicator unit contains 12 applicator elements, evenly spaced on the holder to permit their simultaneous passage into the receptacles on the inoculum block. As applicator elements, red sable watercolor brushes of No. 1 size are preferred, although other suitable elements may be used.
The invention makes it possible to apply rapidly and efficiently a series of microbial culture specimens to a substrate, producing a plurality of microbial growth fronts in close proximity to each other for ease of comparison and measurement. A single operator, for example, can streak inoculate approximately 100 gradient plates within 15 minutes, each plate having 12 distinct micro-organisms. Screening procedures are accelerated through the use of the invention, and more information is available for a broadly-based prediction of the in-product activity of antimicrobial compounds.
The apparatus herein disclosed may also be used with the gradient plate procedure to measure other responses to compounds. For example, stimulation, pigment production changes, and mold sporulation effects can be measured. Synergism, antagonism and inactivation can also be studied using the disclosed apparatus with the gradient plate process.
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the embodiments of the inventiondescribed above are meant to be exemplary and are susceptible of considerable variation and modification without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Therefore, the scope of the invention Will not be deemed limited except as defined in the appended claims.
1. Apparatus for simultaneously applying a plurality of microorganisms in streaks to a substrate, comprising an inoculum bloc-k containing a plurality of linearly arranged receptacles for receiving and holding inocula, a plurality of guide channels which are equal in number to the receptacles and which lead along the upward face of the block from the edge of the receptacles to the edge of the block, and an applicator unit containing a plurality of applicator elements linearly attached to a holder and having a handle, the elements on the applicator unit being equal in number to the receptacles in the inoculum block, and being spaced at intervals equal to the spacing of the receptacles, and insertable in the receptacles to withdraw inocula therefrom.
2. Apparatus as described in claim 1, wherein the applicator elements are attached near one edge of the element holder.
3. Apparatus as described in claim 1, wherein the inoculum block and applicator element holder are constructed of aluminum.
4. Apparatus as described in claim 1, wherein the applicator elements on the applicator unit are brushes.
5. Apparatus as described in claim 1, wherein the applicator elements are fastened permanently to the element holder.
6. Apparatus as described in claim 1, wherein the applicator elements are detachable from the element holder.
References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,512,893 10/1964 Fulweiler.
2,838,781 6/ 1958 Molle l5257.06 2,956,931 10/ 1960 Goldberg.
3,234,107 2/1966 Kaufman et al.
ALVIN E. TANENHOLTZ, Primary Examiner US. Cl. X.R.
l5166; ll03.5, 120, 127; 220-21
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US1512893 *||Jan 12, 1922||Oct 21, 1924||U G I Contracting Company||Quantitative determination of hydrogen sulphide in illuminating and other gas|
|US2838781 *||Mar 29, 1954||Jun 17, 1958||Sherwin Williams Co||Multiple color paint tray|
|US2956931 *||Nov 10, 1958||Oct 18, 1960||Goldberg Sidney||Dispensing biological materials|
|US3234107 *||Feb 21, 1964||Feb 8, 1966||Pfizer & Co C||Diagnostic device|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3757376 *||Nov 17, 1971||Sep 11, 1973||J Coombes||Tool|
|US4010077 *||Feb 24, 1975||Mar 1, 1977||George Pardos||Bacteriological transfer loop|
|US4144135 *||Jul 20, 1977||Mar 13, 1979||Mpj Developments Limited||Spreader device and method of spreading inoculant|
|US4235971 *||Jun 9, 1978||Nov 25, 1980||Dynatech Laboratories, Incorporated||Inoculator|
|US4480031 *||Dec 2, 1982||Oct 30, 1984||Shaw Joseph R H||Replicator with slidable pins|
|US4951684 *||Mar 20, 1989||Aug 28, 1990||Syntex (U.S.A.) Inc.||Device for collecting biological material|
|US5028529 *||Nov 9, 1989||Jul 2, 1991||Ab Biodisk||Method and device for producing varying concentration patterns of chemically or biologically active substances|
|US5279964 *||Nov 8, 1991||Jan 18, 1994||Chrisope Technologies, Inc.||Storable inoculation device containing stabilized microorganisms|
|US6051423 *||Jul 31, 1998||Apr 18, 2000||University Technologies International Inc.||Biofilm assay|
|US6326190 *||Jan 18, 2000||Dec 4, 2001||University Technologies International, Inc.||Biofilm assay|
|US6596505||Apr 17, 2001||Jul 22, 2003||University Technologies International, Inc.||Apparatus and methods for testing effects of materials and surface coatings on the formation of biofilms|
|US6599696||May 2, 2002||Jul 29, 2003||University Technologies International, Inc.||Effects of materials and surface coatings on encrustation and biofilm formation|
|US7041470||Mar 27, 2002||May 9, 2006||University Technologies International, Inc.||Method of assaying the susceptibility of biofilms to anti-microbial agents|
|US7863034||Jul 21, 2006||Jan 4, 2011||Medvet Science Pty Ltd||Microbial streaking device|
|US8408860||Jan 11, 2008||Apr 2, 2013||Labtech Systems Limited||Method and apparatus for orientating a solid growth culture medium plate|
|US8691558||Jan 11, 2008||Apr 8, 2014||Lbt Innovations Limited||Method and apparatus for inoculating and streaking a medium in a plate|
|US8696294||Feb 28, 2013||Apr 15, 2014||Lbt Innovations Limited||Method and apparatus for orientating a solid growth culture medium plate|
|US9029129||Jan 11, 2008||May 12, 2015||Lbt Innovations Limited||Streaking applicator cartridge and a system for connecting same to a streaking apparatus|
|US20030032079 *||Apr 17, 2001||Feb 13, 2003||Howard Ceri||Apparatus and method for testing effects of materials and surface coating on the formation of biofilms|
|US20060166358 *||Dec 15, 2005||Jul 27, 2006||University Technologies International, Inc.||Biofilm incubation|
|US20070202564 *||Jul 21, 2006||Aug 30, 2007||Medvet Science Pty Ltd.||Microbial streaking device|
|US20100097893 *||Jan 11, 2008||Apr 22, 2010||Lab Tech Systems Limited||Method and Apparatus for Locating the Surface of Solid Growth Culture Media in a Plate|
|US20100099181 *||Jan 11, 2008||Apr 22, 2010||Labtech Systems Limited||Streaking Applicator Cartridge and a System for Connecting Same to a Streaking Apparatus|
|US20100172735 *||Jan 11, 2008||Jul 8, 2010||Labtech Systems Limited||Method and Apparatus for Orientating a Solid Growth Culture Medium Plate|
|US20100173416 *||Jan 11, 2008||Jul 8, 2010||Labtech Systems Limited||Method and Apparatus for Inoculating and Streaking a Medium in a Plate|
|CN1918280B||Jan 21, 2005||Sep 7, 2011||默德威特科技有限公司||Microbial streaking device|
|EP1720971A1 *||Jan 21, 2005||Nov 15, 2006||Medvet Science Pty. Ltd.||Microbial streaking device|
|WO1987005323A1 *||Mar 2, 1987||Sep 11, 1987||The University Of Manchester Institute Of Science||Sampling of material|
|U.S. Classification||435/309.1, 435/34, 220/507, 15/166, 435/32, 435/30|
|Cooperative Classification||C12M33/04, C12M33/06|