Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3456582 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateJul 22, 1969
Filing dateSep 29, 1966
Priority dateSep 29, 1966
Publication numberUS 3456582 A, US 3456582A, US-A-3456582, US3456582 A, US3456582A
InventorsJohn A Mcclenathan
Original AssigneeBeloit Corp
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Crownless electromagnetic press roll loading
US 3456582 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

y 1969 .J. A. MCCLENATHAN 3,456,582


Jay/v ,4. MCQ 01/4 THAN HY M i-vrmlwliw y 2 1969 J. A. MCCLENATHAN 3,456,532

CROWNLESS ELECTROMAGNETIC PRESS ROLL LOADING POM/5E BY @Wwrrmwws United States Patent F 3,456,582 CROWNLESS ELECTROMAGNETIC PRESS ROLL LOADING John A. McClenathan, Beloit, Wis., assignor to Belolt Corporation, Beloit, Wis., a corporation of Wisconsin Filed Sept. 29, 1966, Ser. No. 582,906 Int. Cl. 1330b 3/00, 3/04 US. Cl. 100155 1 Claim ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE This invention relates generally to pressure rollers and more particularly to pressure rollers of the type which can exert either a uniform pressure along the nip of the rollers or a continuously variable pressure along the nip of the rollers. The pressure rollers of the present invention have particular utility when used in conjunction with a paper making machine.

Many processing machines have rollers by means of which a relatively wide and flat portion of a web is advanced and simultaneously subjected in a continuous manner to .a processing function which applies various degrees of pressure to the web. Depending upon the type of processing function to which the web is subjected, the rollers, henceforth will be designated as pressure rollers. Such pressure rollers may be in the form of a single roll which is in rotatable contact with a flat surface, or may be a pair of rollers which are urged together to press the web therebetween, as is the case with web squeezers of the paper making industry.

The arrangement of all such pressure rollers is primarily the same. In most instances both ends of each roller are journalled by pivots or shafts and are driven through one of the shafts or at a point on the outer circumference of the roll. With roller pairs, each roller may be driven individually or through the intervention of an intermediate transmission connected to the two rollers.

The pressing force which is exerted by the pressure rollers is exerted upon the end bearings which are displaced in lateral frame walls, for example by hydraulic fluid or by spring means, and is conveyed to the web through the nip region between the rollers. The transfer of pressure from the end support to the nip region of the rolls not only requires correspondingly large bearing supports due to the high occurring stresses, but also the rolls themselves must have a relatively large diameter in order to minimize deflection or bending at the center of the rolls. It is a well known fact that any deflection or bending will result in a nonuniform pressing of the web as it passes between the rolls. Such non-uniform pressure causes many difficulties and represents a problem well known in connection with pressure rollers of the paper making industry. In order to minimize deflection or bending of the pressure rolls, one solution is to make the rolls of solid material. This, however, requires a large amount of material which greatly increases the cost of such pressure rollers. Furthermore, it may be intended, by the use of the solid roll construction, to increase the weight of the roll in order to gain a more effective pressure.

FL C6 Furthermore, increasing the total weight of the roll will also increase the inertia thereof as well as increase the needed bearing capacity at the ends of the roll.

Crowning the roll surface will only provide a relatively narrow range of roll loading wherein uniform nip pressure is maintained across the roll face. With additional loading by magnetic means, as set forth in the present invention, the loading may be changed without changing the roll surface to maintain a uniform nip pressure across the roll face.

Therefore, one of the primary objects of the present invention is to provide pressure rolls which are relatively light weight and which rolls are capable of exerting a uniform pressure profile along the axial length thereof, and which rolls are relatively inexpensive to manufacture and highly efiicient in operation.

Another object of the present invention is to provide a pair of pressure rolls especially for use in connection with the paper making industry, which will make it possible to considerably and safely reduce the weight of the pressure rolls and the end support means therefor.

Another object of the present invention is to provide pressure rolls, especially for the use in connection with the paper making industry, which will have a substantially reduced inertia.

Still another object of the invention is to provide pressure rolls having a variable pressure profile along the axial length of the nip, and the pressure exerted therebetween can be varied at different points along the length of the nip.

One of the primary advantages of the present invention is the use of a relatively small diameter nip roll which permits increased unit nip pressure without the use of heavy backing rolls, which are otherwise used to transmit loading forces through the pressure roll.

Still another object of the present invention is to provide pressure rollers which are heated as a function of their natural operation, to facilitate the removal of water from the web and thereby increase the efiiciency of the paper making machine.

A feature of the present invention is the use of a variable magnetic field which passes from one roller into and through an adjacent roller which is constructed of material having magnetic properties.

Briefly, the present invention provides a roller having a plurality of electromagnets, and which magnets can rotate with the roller or remain stationary relative to an exterior rotatable shell. A second roller, of magnetic material, is positioned adjacent the roller having electromagnets and is attracted thereto by a magnetic field. The magnetic field generated within the roller can be varied along different axial points of the roller thereby applying a controllably variable pressure profile along the axial length of the roller. Not only can the nip pressure profile be variably controlled along the axial length of the roller, but the absolute magnitude of nip pressure may be controlled from no load to maximum load.

The invention, however, will be more fully realized by the novel structure of this invention and more fully understood from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals throughout the various use of the drawings are intended to designate similar elements or components and wherein:

FIGURE 1 is an elevational sectional view of pressure rollers constructed in accordance with the principles of this invention;

FIGURE 2 is an elevational sectional view taken along the line IIII of FIGURE 1;

FIGURE 3 is an elevational sectional view of an alternate embodiment of the present invention;

FIGURE 4 is still another alternate embodiment of the present invention;

FIGURE 5 is a further alternate embodiment of the present invention;

FIGURE 6 is a top plan view of the electromagnetic roller of FIGURE 5; and

FIGURE 7 is a diagrammatic representation of the electromagnetic pressure roller of the present invention showing a particular pressure profile.

As seen in FIGURE 1, a magnetic roller 10 is positioned for rotatable engagement with a second roller 11. The roller 11 is constructed of magnetic material, such as cast iron or steel. A rotatable hollow shell 12 forms the outer surface of the magnetic roller 10. A stationary core 13 is positioned within the shell 12 and concentric therewith. In this embodiment, the core 13 is preferably stationary and only the outer shell 12 is rotatable.

As seen in FIGURE 2, the core 13 has a cross section similar to an I beam. Although this configuration has been found advantageous, it will be understood that other types of core members can be used. A plurality of electromagnets 15 are secured to a plurality of brackets 16 of the core 13. The electromagnets 15 have U-shaped cores 15A with leg portions extending upwardly toward the roller 11. In one embodiment of the present invention, a gap 17 is provided between the extremity of the legs of the core 15A and the interior surface of the shell 12. Therefore, the shell 12 must be sufiiciently rigid to support the squeezing force from the roller 11. Another embodiment of the present invention is one in which the extended leg portions of the cores 15A are slidably engaged with the interior surface of the shell 12 in such a manner as to support the shell 12, as seen in FIGURE 2.

By way of example, the magnetic field which is generated by the electromagnet 15, passes from one leg of the magnet 15 through the non-magnetic shell 12 and into the surface of the magnetic roll 11 which is adjacent the electromagnet 15. The magnetic field then passes through the roller 11 in a line substantially parallel to the axis thereof and then through the non-magnetic shell 12 into the other extended legs of the electromagnet 15. Therefore, the complete magnetic circuit for each electromagnet includes a portion of the roll 11. By increasing the magnetic field which is generated by each electromagnet 15, the roll 11 is attracted toward the surface of the shell 12 with increased force. Furthermore, different ones of the electromagnets 15 can be energized at different levels thereby providing a variable pressure profile along the axial length of the nip between the rollers 10 and 11. The hysteresis losses, as well as frictional heat, may be used to increase the viscosity of water being removed by the press, thereby increasing the efliciency of the squeeze rollers 10 and 11.

As mentioned hereinabove, the extended leg portions of each of the electromagnets 15 may be in slidable contact with the interior surface of the shell 12. In this instance, a hydraulic lubricating system using oil or air or a combination of both may be used to reduce wear between the leg portions and the interior surface of the shell 12.

As seen in FIGURE 3, a magnetic roller 10a has a plurality of rotating magnets 17. The magnets 17 are contoured to fit firmly within the shell 12a and are rotatable therewith. The magnetic field which is generated by the magnets 17 passes through the shell 12a and into the roller 11. Therefore, the magnetic circuit of each of the electromagnets 17 is completed only in the nip region of the rollers 11 and 12a. The direction of the magnetic flux which is generated by each adjacent electromagnet 17 may be either aiding or opposing the magnetic fiux which is generated by each adjacent electromagnet 17. However, it will be understood that as the electromagnets 17 are moved closer together within the roll it is preferable to have the magnetic flux passing through adjacent extended portions of the electromagnets in the aiding direction. That is, the arrowhead lines indicating the flux path will be in the same direction passing through the extended leg portions 17a of the electromagnets 17.

Although the embodiment shown in FIGURE 3 has only one magnetic roller 10a, it is not to be construed limited solely thereto. The roller 11 may be replaced by a roller which is constructed similar to the roller 1012. In this instance, the magnetic field generated by each roller would produce substantially twice the pressing force as compared to the roller 11 being merely of magnetic material.

As seen in FIGURE 4, a magnetic roller 1012 has a center shaft 18 which, in turn, supports a plurality of electromagnets 19. The electromagnets 19 are maintained in a fixed position relative to the shaft 18 by a key 21. Each of the electromagnets 19 is provided with an annular ring 19a. As seen in FIGURE 4, the cross section of each of the rings 19:: is somewhat L-shaped having an extended flange 1% extending radially outwardly of the shaft 18. The annular rings 19a are placed on the shaft, one next to the other, in such a manner as to cause the extended radial portion of each ring to provide a magnetic flux path for the electromagnetic coils 22. That is, the radially extended portion 19b of each ring 19a provides a flux path for the two electromagnetic coils on opposite sides thereof, as indicated by the arrowhead lines 23. A plurality of non-magnetic spacer rings 24 are positioned over each of the electromagnetic coils 22 and between adjacent radially extended portions. Suitable O-rings or other seal means may be provided between the radially extended portions of the rings 19a and the ring spacers 24 to prevent moisture or other foreign material from collecting on the electromagnetic coils 22.

The rings 19a are wound with wire or small copper tubing in which a coolant may be circulated, if necessary. The thermal expansion of the non-magnetic rings 24 and of the magnetic rings 19a should be substantially the same to provide an even surface at elevated operating temperatures. As mentioned hereinabove, the roller 11 may be replaced by a roll which is constructed substantially the same as the magnetic roller 10b to provide an increased squeezing pressure at the nip region of the rollers.

As seen in FIGURES 5 and 6, the magnetic roller 10c has a plurality of fins 26 extending radially outwardly of the roller. Preferably, each of the fins 26 is discontinuous throughout the axial length of the roller 100. Therefore, each pair of fins 26 constitutes a U-shaped core of an electromagnet. An electromagnetic coil 27 is wrapped about each of the cores of the magnetic roller 100 between each of the fins 26. Although the coils 27 are shown as being wrapped in the same direction about the core, it will be understood that each adjacent coil is wrapped in the opposite direction to produce flux paths which are opposing between successive coils. Furthermore, it will be understood that through the use of a commutator, only the coils which are in the immediate area of the nip roll 11a need be energized to complete the magnetic flux path. A nonmagnetic spacer 28 is fashioned so as to fit within the open area between the extended finned portions 26, thereby providing a continuous roller surface for the magnetic roller 100. Furthermore, a non-magnetic spacer or cover ring 35 is provided between each row of electromagnets associated with the roll 10c. That is, the spacer 35 is an annular ring which is placed between adjacent annular rows of electromagnets to prevent interaction between the magnets of one row with the electromagnets of the adjacent row. The non-magnetic spacer 35 also serves as a covering over the open end of each annular segment of the electromagnets of the roll 10c. Preferably, the roller 11a, of magnetic material, has a greater diameter than the roller 11 so as to be more etfective when used with the embodiment disclosed by roller 10c.

In operation, the magnetic field which is generated by each of the electromagnetic coils 27 passes through the extended fin portions 26 and intothe roller 11a, as indicated by the arrowed lines 29. Therefore, the magnetic circuit for each of the electromagnetic coils 27 is closed only when a corresponding pair of finned portions 26 are adjacent the roller 110. On the other hand, the magnetic circuits of the remaining finned portions, which are not adjacent the roller 11a, are substantially discontinuous, thereby offering a relatively high impedance to the electromagnetic coils 27. Since only the electromagnetic coils which have their extended fin portions adjacent the roller 11a offer maximum load to the current supply connected thereto, relatively little power is consumed on the coils which have their extended fin portion separated by a non magnetic medium such as air. The coils 27 are electrically connected in parallel to a power source 30. A current control resistor 31 is connected between the coils 27 and the power source 30 to provide means for controlling the relative strength of the magnet field.

Seen in FIGURE 7 is a diagrammatic representation of one particular pressure profile which can be obtained by using the novel pressure rollers of the present invention. By way of example, the magnetic roller 10 may be divided into a plurality of magnetically controlled sections such as A, B, C, and D. The magnetic force generated by each section is variable independent of the other sections. Therefore, not only can the pressure rollers of the present invention provide a uniform pressure profile along the axial length of the nip, but also the pressure rollers of the present invention can provide a variable pressure profile along the axial length of the nip.

It will be understood that variations and modifications may be effected without departing from the spirit and scope of the novel concepts of this invention.

I claim as my invention:

1. An apparatus for applying pressure to a web comprising:

a surface of magnetic material for receiving the web thereon;

a cylindrical sleeve of non-magnetic material;

a plurality of electromagnets positioned within said sleeve for creating a magnetic field through said sleeve and into said surface of magnetic material; and

means connected to each of said electromagnets for supplying electric power thereto and providing means for varying the current to each of said electromagnets independent of one another thereby providing a variable force profile between said sleeve and said surface of magnetic material.

References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 639,062 12/ 1899 Kreuser. 1,208,880 12/1916 Wright et al. 1,369,516 2/1921 Bethke. 1,546,330 7/ 1925 Ullrich. 1,561,063 11/1925 Dunlap. 1,812,505 6/1931 Wertz 198-41 2,430,285 11/1947 Ferris. 2,940,584 6/1960 Kunz 198-41 3,067,718 12/1962 Kraft. 3,310,155 3/1967 Ungerer.

FOREIGN PATENTS 363,317 9/ 1962 Switzerland. 150,048 12/ 1961 U.S.S.R.

PETER FELDMAN, Primary Examiner US. Cl. X.R.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US639062 *May 12, 1899Dec 12, 1899Emil KreuserElectromagnetic apparatus for separating ores.
US1208880 *May 26, 1913Dec 19, 1916Parvin WrightMagnetic separator.
US1369516 *Nov 5, 1917Feb 22, 1921Magnetic Mfg CompanyMagnetic separator
US1546330 *Apr 16, 1923Jul 14, 1925Krupp Ag GrusonwerkProcess and apparatus for disintegrating and finely grinding hard and soft substances
US1561063 *Feb 8, 1924Nov 10, 1925Dunlap Matthew ElbridgeMethod and apparatus for making plywood
US1812505 *May 9, 1929Jun 30, 1931Ohio Electric Mfg CoMeans for conveying magnetic material
US2430285 *Dec 23, 1940Nov 4, 1947Gen Motors CorpElectromagnetic ironing machine
US2940584 *May 8, 1956Jun 14, 1960Eastman Kodak CoRoll film processing apparatus
US3067718 *Nov 3, 1959Dec 11, 1962Johannes Zimmer MaschfApparatus for treating sheet materials
US3310155 *Oct 2, 1964Mar 21, 1967Ungerer IrmaMagnetic conveyor rollers
CH363317A * Title not available
SU150048A1 * Title not available
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4062097 *Dec 30, 1976Dec 13, 1977Valmet OyRoll having magnetic deflection compensation
US4290353 *Nov 28, 1979Sep 22, 1981Kleinewefers GmbhRoll for calenders or the like
US4301582 *Oct 16, 1979Nov 24, 1981Valmet OyRoller magnetically compensated and adjusted for deflection
US4376330 *Sep 29, 1980Mar 15, 1983Kleinwefers GmbhFlexure-resistant calender roll
US4384514 *Mar 3, 1981May 24, 1983Consolidated-Bathurst Inc.Nip control method and apparatus
US4467529 *Sep 24, 1982Aug 28, 1984CandorElectrostatic method and apparatus for treating material
US4493197 *Sep 29, 1982Jan 15, 1985Meiler Hans EFoulard machine
US4538514 *Jul 5, 1984Sep 3, 1985M.A.N.-Roland Druckmaschinen AktiengesellschaftInking or damping unit for rotary printing machines
US4653396 *May 7, 1985Mar 31, 1987Measurex CorporationRecirculating air calender roll controller
US4658716 *Apr 12, 1985Apr 21, 1987Measurex CorporationInfrared heating calender roll controller
US4671173 *Apr 25, 1985Jun 9, 1987Measurex CorporationSteam jet calender controller with condensate suction
US5392702 *Nov 15, 1993Feb 28, 1995Bellmatic, Ltd.Magnetic rolling system having rollers with laminated ply units disposed therein
US5782177 *Feb 20, 1996Jul 21, 1998Ems Elektromagnetische Systeme GmbhElectromagnetic roller arrangement
US5938579 *Jul 16, 1997Aug 17, 1999Cavazos; Arnold B.Magnetic roller
US6349637Sep 18, 2000Feb 26, 2002Sgm, S.P.A.Calender with magnetic device for adjusting the contact pressure between the rolls
US6464834 *Feb 23, 2001Oct 15, 2002Voith Paper Patent GmbhCalender roll and process for operating a calender roll
DE2658854A1 *Dec 24, 1976Jul 14, 1977Valmet OyDurchbiegungskompensierte, an den enden belastete walze, insbesondere presswalze in einer papiermaschine
DE2932857A1 *Aug 14, 1979Feb 26, 1981Messerschmitt Boelkow BlohmEinrichtung zum magnetischen ausgleich der durchbiegung eines rotierenden koerpers, insbesondere einer kalanderwalze
DE2941856A1 *Oct 16, 1979May 22, 1980Valmet OyWalze mit magnetisch kompensierter und/oder geregelter durchbiegung
DE3212834A1 *Apr 6, 1982Nov 18, 1982Valmet OyMagnetisch durchbiegungskompensierte und/oder -geregelte walze
DE19507828C1 *Feb 22, 1995Mar 28, 1996Rindfleisch Hans Jochen Dr IngElectromagnetic setting of press rollers force for saving material, energy, etc.
EP0188399A1 *Jan 6, 1986Jul 23, 1986Beloit CorporationElectromagnetic extended nip press
WO1996026369A1 *Feb 20, 1996Aug 29, 1996Rindfleisch Hans JochenElectromagnetic roller arrangement
WO2000047815A1 *Feb 8, 2000Aug 17, 2000Sgm SpaCalender with magnetic device for adjusting the contact pressure between the rolls
U.S. Classification100/155.00R, 492/20, 492/7, 100/163.00R, 492/8, 19/272, 100/299, 198/624, 100/917
International ClassificationD21G1/00
Cooperative ClassificationY10S100/917, D21G1/0053
European ClassificationD21G1/00C4D