Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3502316 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateMar 24, 1970
Filing dateJan 26, 1968
Priority dateJan 26, 1968
Also published asUS3845011
Publication numberUS 3502316 A, US 3502316A, US-A-3502316, US3502316 A, US3502316A
InventorsTore V Saether
Original AssigneeAcushnet Process Co
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Elastomeric platform and support therefor
US 3502316 A
Images(2)
Previous page
Next page
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

March 24, 1970 1". v. srAvETHEvR 3,502,316

ELASTOMERIG PLATFORM-AND SUPPORT THEREFOR 2 Sheets-Sheet 1 Filed Jan. 26, 1968 INVENTOR. TORE V. SAETHER March 24, 1970 T. v. SAETHER 3,502,316

ELASTOMERIC PLATFORM AND SUPPORT THEREFOR Filed Jan. 26. 1968 2 Sheets-Sheet .2`

INVENTOR. ToRE v. SAETHER United States Patent 3,502,316 ELASTOMERIC PLATFORM AND SUPPORT THEREFUR Tore V. Saether, Mattapoisett, Mass., assignor to Acushnet Process Company, a corporation of Massachusetts Continuation-impart ofapplication Ser. No. 438,959, Mar. 11, 1965. This application Jan. 26, 1968, Ser. No. 710,418

Int. Cl. A47c 7/02 U.S. Cl. 267-110 6 Claims ABSTRACT 0F THE DISCLOSURE An elastomeric platform for furniture is manufactured with particular control and correlation over four of its physical properties, so that the durometer, Shore A, hardness of the platform is from about 55 to about 80 (measured by ASTM D-676-59T); the modulus at 50% elongation of the platform is from about 150 to about 600 p.s.i. (measured by ASTM D-4l2-62T); the tear resistance of the platform is at least about 100 pounds per inch (measured by ASTM D-624-54, die C); and the tension set of the platform is not more than about 35% (measured by ASTM D-4l2-62T). Such control and correlation achieve substantial improvements in the performance of the platform when installed underl tension as a supporting member in a furniture frame, these irnprovements including minimum permanent deflection and distortion of the platform by cold iiow, minimum stress relaxation and consequent long life of the platform under severe conditions of use, and capability of the platform to be installed over a range of tensions from slightly above zero up to about with full retention of the aforesaid advantages, whereby the platform is more versatile and useful as a supporting member in a greater variety of specific applications.

This application is a continuation-impart of my earlier copending application Ser. No. 438,959, filed Mar. 11, 1965, now abandoned.

The present invention relates to an improved elastomeric platform which forms a support for cushions, upholstery and the like in articles of furniture. In some instances the platform may form the seating surface. The elastomeric platform of the present invention has certain specified hardness, tear resistance, modulus of elongation and tension set which provides a minimum of permanent deflection and distortion of the platform by cold flow under ordinary conditions of use.

For many years strips of textile fabric have been widely used in articles of furniture as the support for cushions and the like. While such textile fabric strips provide a satisfactory support the resiliency and flexible characteristics of the support are severely limited. If the strips are not tight enough the tendency is for the support to sag excessively. If the strips are sufficiently tight to avoid sagging, the resiliency and exibility of the support is restricted within fairly narrow limits and seating comfort is largely determined by the amount of padding in the cushions or upholstery used in the article of furniture. The strips have the further disadvantages of high installation cost and extrusion of the upholstery down between the strips.

More recently elastomeric platforms such as a rubber platform have been suggested as the support in place of the textile fabric strips. But in use these platforms have not proven to be entirely satisfactory. Up until now the elastomeric platform has been suspended in the furniture frame by means of metal clips or hooks. The metal clips 3 ,5 02,3 16 Patented Mar. 24, 1970 ICC are attached to the platform and special attachment means must be built into the frame of the furniture to accommodate the metal clips. The location of the attachment means in the frame must be indexed to correspond to the location of the metal clips carried by the platfonn. Building special attachment means into the furniture frame is expensive and it is virtually impossible to achieve such precise indexing that the platform in successive articles of furniture will have the desired resiliency when stretched to tit the frame. A description of such metal attachment clips may be found in patent application Ser. No. 265,932 filed Mar. 18, 1963, now Patent No. 3,179,469.

Some improvement over the metal attachment clips can be realized at considerable expense by using adjustable turnbuckles in place of the clips. But adjustable turnbuckles do not solve the problem. As frequently happens it is necessary to adjust the span of the support to t different articles of furniture by as much as three inches on each side. If this is done and the turnbuckles are fully extended, there is twelve inches of solid metal in the support which seriously impairs the comfort of the seat.

It also happens that each furniture manufacturer has his own specific requirements for the amount of resiliency and exibility that is required in the base support. The required amount of resiliency and flexibility is determined by the particular article at hand and the characteristics of the cushions or upholstery padding. It has been determined that the resiliency and flexibility in a seat depend primarily upon the proper combination of stretch or tension in the platform, and also, the durometer hardness and modulus of the material from which the paltform is made. In one article of furniture the desired seating comfort may be achieved by stretching the platform up to 20% beyond normal dimensions and, in a different article of furniture, the same platform may be installed without stretch and just be drawn taut. Furthermore, within one article of furniture, the platform may be stretched as much as 20% in one direction and subjected to no stretch at all in another direction.

This practice of installing the elastomeric platform under widely different conditions of tension further complicates the problem. As is known, elastomers such as rubber when under tension for a period of time will take a permanent set and the amount of permanent set is, among other things, a function of the state of cure and tension in the rubber. In use, as the elastomeric platform takes a permanent set, the comfort of the seat changes and a large amount of permanent set in the elastomeric platform will destroy seating comfort. In the case of metal attachment clips, this problem can be overcome by supplying different sized platforms tailormade for a specified installation stretch, but this greatly increases the inventory which adds to the expense and handling problems.

The present invention overcomes these problems and there has been devised a satisfactory seating support which comprises an elastomeric platform having physical properties controlled within specified limits to maintain seating comfort over the range of tension customarily employed by furniture manufacturers, and to also achieve other substantial improvements in the porformance of the platform. In a preferred embodiment resilient adjustable attachment means are employed for assembling the platform in a furniture frame.

When the physical properties of the platform are controlled and correlated to each other in accordance with the teachings of this invention, one important result is that the platform is subject only to a minimum of permanent deection and distortion by cold flow and therefore the platform does not sag or otherwise gradually distort in a detrimental way over long periods of use. This important advantage of the platform is illustrated by the fact that when heavy loads, e.g. 200 lbs., are continuously applied to it for long periods of up to 20 weeks, the platform will deform permanently by cold flow from its original configuration on the order of only up to 5% underthe stated conditions.

Another important advantage of an elastomeric platform made in accordance with the invention is that the platform undergoes only a minimum of stress relaxation after it is subjected to regular pounding with a standard weight for 250,000 to 500,000 cycles, which simulates up to years or more of actual use. Thus, the improved platform of the invention has a very long life and can be reliably used in applications involving years of use without the danger of failure.

A further advantage that is achieved in an elastomer platform made in accordance with the invention is that the platform can be installed in a furniture frame with a degree of stretch or tension anywhere within the range from slightly above zero (i.e. just taut) up to about without any appreciable impairment of the previouslydescribed advantages pertaining to the durability and long life of the platform. As a result, the platform is highly versatile and can be used to advantage in a greater variety of specific applications than can conventional platforms. This feature is not only important from the technical functional viewpoint but also from a commercial viewpoint because one of the problems that has been encountered heretofore with conventional elastomer platforms, due to inability to foretell the performance of any particular one of such platforms in any particular application, has been the relatively high costs and burdens of having to manufacture the platforms on a largely tailormade basis geared to the mode of attachment, degree of installed tension, and other parameters of each specific application that have an effect upon the performance and life of the platform. Thus, the economic savings that would be derived from the ability to mass-produce a relatively small inventory of a few basic elastomer platforms, capable of being used in a wide variety of specific applications, has not been realized heretofore. With the high degree .of versatility of elastomer platforms made in accordance with the invention, the aforesaid economic savings in manufacture are more readily achieved and this, in turn, should encourage more widespread use and acceptance of elastomer platforms.

As earlier mentioned, in order to achieve the advantages and benefits of the invention in an elastomer platform, control and correlation are necessary in particular manner in four of the physical properties of the platform. Specifically, the platform must be maufactured to have a durometer, Shore A, hardness of from about 55 to about 80 measured by ASTM D-676-59T; a modulus at 50% elongation of from about 150 to about 600 p.s.i. measured by ASTM D-4l2-62T; a tear resistance of at least about 100 pounds per inch measured by ASTM D-624-54, die C; and a tension set of not more than about 35% measured by ASTM D4l2-62T. The aforesaid ASTM designations and those hereafter mentioned specifically refer to the corresponding test procedures thereby denoted, as prescribed by the American Society for Testing Materials for use as of Mar. 1l, 1965.

Determination of the aforesaid physical properties which are critical and essential in the elastomeric platform was solved in research work by means of a simple testing device which simulated conditions of use in a furniture frame. First, the best combination of stretch, durometer hardness and modulus to get initial seating comfort was determined. Then, in the testing device, various platforms made with these different combinations were tested by repeatedly dropping a l40-pound weight in free fall on the elastomeric platform suspended with the resilient attachment means of the present invention. Using this device and the data obtained, it was then determined which physical properties not only gave initial seating comfort but also gave the maximum life before breaking and retained the seating comfort for the longest period of time. It was found that when the physical properties of the rubber were held within specic limits, an assembly could be obtained which would have optimum seating comfort over a long period of time and maximum life when subjected to repeated flexing.

The above-defined critical and essential physical properties in elastomer platforms made in accordance with the invention may be achieved by suitable selection of conventional elastomer and compounding ingredients and relative proportions thereof. As is well known in the art, the compounding of elastomer or rubber formulations can be varied in known ways to change the physical properties of an article that is cured and molded from the formulation, and the knowledge of a skilled person in the rubber compounding art is suicient to enable him to decide which ingredient or which proportion of ingredient should be changed in order to bring about a desired change in the general direction or magnitude of any one of the nal physical properties that are essential in the present invention. Therefore, conventional elastomer ingredients, e.g. natural rubber, styrene-butadiene rubber, neoprene,

butyl rubber, nitrile rubber, chlorosulfonated polyethylene elastomer, polystyrene elastomer, polybutadiene rubber, ethylene-propylene elastomers and ethylene-Propyleneterpolymer elastomers, compounded with conventional ingredients such as carbon black and other inorganic solid fillers, curing agents, accelerators, promoters, lubricants, extenders, plasticizers, antioxidants and antiozonants, may be used to prepare formulations from which the improved platforms of the invention are produced by applicationof heat and pressure to the formulations in a platform mold, with suitable adjustments in the composition of the formulation by change of one or more ingredients therein and/ or of one or more relative proportions of ingredients therein as may be necessary to achieve the required critical and essential physical properties in the nal platform.

The resilient attachment straps of the present invention are preferably made of textile fabric material such as the upholsterer-s tape customarily employed in conventional webbing sometimes used for forming the platform seat. The conventional upholsterers tape or strap comes in rolls and in order to mount the elastomeric platform in the furniture frame it is only necessary to slip the free end of the strap through an opening in the platform and then tack, staple or otherwise attach the free end of the strap to any desired portion of the furniture frame. Thereafter the strap is pulled tight to provide the desired installment stretch in the elastomeric platform and the second end of the strap is attached to the frame and cutoff adjacent the place of attachment.

The resilient attachment straps of the present invention completely eliminate the need for building special attachment means into the frame of the furniture. The straps may be attached to the furniture frame in any desired location which is of advantage since the load can be distributed and corrolated to the strength of the frame. The length of the straps can be readily adjusted to t changes in dimension of the furniture frame and any desired installment stretch may be incorporated into the elastomeric platform in keeping with the required seating comfort for the padding which is to be used in the cushions or upholstery.

While the conventional upholsterers tape customarily used in furniture is preferred, the attachment straps may be made of any desired material provided however that the straps have some elastic resiliency but not more than, one-half the elastic resiliency of the elastomeric platform. An elasticity in the strap which exceeds more than about; One-half that of the elastomeric platform will interfere with control of the permanent set in the platform. Resilient elastic metal straps may be employed such as beryllium copper but as previously stated upholsterers tapes conventionally employed in fu-rniture is preferred since the textile fabric is soft and its resiliency ideally fits the specified control of the permanent set of the platform.

Further details of the elastomeric platform of the present invention may be readily understood in connection with the description of the drawings which illustrate a preferred form of the invention and in which FIG. 1 is a top view illustrating the elastomeric platform in position in a wood furniture frame.

FIG. 2 illustrates use of a modified form of upholsterers tape.

FIG. 3 illustrates a preferred reinforcing of the openings in the platform.

FIG. 4 illustrates apparatus for determining the permanent set in the elastomeric platform.

FIG. 1 illustrates a top view of a wood frame 10 such as may be used in a casual chair. The frame has the usual seat opening 12 and stretched ac-ross the opening is the elastomeric platform 14 with attachment straps 16 which in the preferred form of structure shown are upholsterers tape of the type used in conventional articles of furniture. The elastomeric platform is 0.080 thick and it is provided with a plurality of openings 18 adapted to receive the straps. Best results in comfort are achieved by thinning the body of the platform in the area between the openings along the side of the platform (not shown). For example the thinned area may be 0.030 thick and extend from the edge of the body of the platform inwardly to about or just beyond the inner edge of the openings and l along the side to just short of the side edge of adjacent openings. Alternatively the rubber in the thinned area may be omitted so that the openings will be located in attachment tabs as shown in the drawings of the above mentioned patent application Ser. No. 265,932. A -bead of rubber (not shown) is preferably positioned along the periphery of the body portion of the platform to increase resistance to tear. As illustrated at 16(a) and 16(17) the elastomeric platform 14 is readily mounted across the opening of the frame by inserting the free end say 16(a) of a roll of upholsterers tape through the opening 18 and then the free end is stapled, tacked or otherwise attached to the wood frame as at 20. The strap is then adjusted to the desired length and a second portion of the strap 16(b) is attached to the wood frame as at 22.

As shown in the preferred form of structure of FIG. 1 the strap in the chair forms a loop havingtwo legs 16(a) and 16(b) each of which are spaced apart and attached to the wood frame at 20 and 22 respectively on either side of upright 24. It is not necessary to separate the legs of the loop of the fabric strap and the legs may be attached to the wood frame with one on top of the other as illustrated at 26. During assembly the length of the loop of each successive strap is adjusted to establish the particular tension or installation stretch desired by the manufacturer.

As illustrated in the drawing the loop of the strap may vary in length and the legs of the loop may be attached in any desired location such as to avoid an upright 24 or to distribute the load in the frame as illust-rated at 28 where the two legs of the loop have a tendency to pull the adjacent sides of the frame together. Any convenient arrangement of the loops is possible and the points of attachment of the legs of the loop may be selected independently of the location of the openings 18. Change in dimension of the wood frame is readily compensated for by changing the length of the loop without change in tension or stretch of the platform and without any noticeable change in seating comfort.

While the looped strap of FIG. l is the preferred form of structure, a single strap with only one leg may be used as illustrated in FIG. 2. As there shown a metal rod or other convenient keeper 30 is sewed or otherwise at` tached in a loop of the strap 31 as at 32 and in such case the strap is cut to a predetermined length of about three to six inches. The keeper is made large enough so that it will not pass through the opening 18. In use the free end 34 of the strap is pulled through the opening 18 and then attached to the wood frame with adjusted length for the tension or stretch desired in the platform.

The elastomeric platform shown in FIG. 1 is generally a square but it will be understood that the platform may ybe of any desired configuration such as that which is for example shown in a copending patent application Ser. No. 265,932 iiled Mar. 18, 1963.

The openings 18 of the platform are preferably reinforced for added strength by means of an insert such as the metal rod 36 which is embedded in the rubber so that the middle portion of the rod will reinforce the outside edge of the hole as shown in FIG. 3. A metal plate (not shown) with opening corresponding to opening 18 may also be embedded in the rubber to strengthen the opening 18.

The elastomeric platform 14 shown in FIG. 1 is made of cured rubber and any of the known synthetic plastic elastomers may be employed. But in order to avoid excessive sagging and to preserve the desired resiliency and flexibility for seating comfort under the varied conditions of installation tension which ranges from just pulling the platform up taut to stretching it up to twenty or more percent of its normal dimension, the elastomeric platform must be made from a material having certain physical properties. The determination of the life of the elastomeric platform and from this the determination of the optimum physical properties is arrived at readily by means of the apparatus illustrated in FIGURE 4.

In carrying out the test the distance across the central area of the body of the platform 14 in a direction parallel to the sides is measured between the inner edge of each of two opposite openings 18 with the platform at room temperature. As illustrated in FIG. 4, the platform 14 is then suspended over the opening 38 in a wood frame 39 by means of resilient attachment straps 16. The straps are so fastened to frame 39 that the platform when suspended over the opening is stretched to about 10% greater dimensions than its normal dimensions. This simulates the mean of the tension to which the platform is subjected when suspended in the frame of furniture. The frame 39 is positioned on a support plate 40 with platform 14 located over the opening 42 in the support plate. Conventional keepers 44 hold the wood frame in position on plate 40.

Plate 40 is mounted in a frame 45. A Weight 46 of one hundred and forty pounds having a bottom surface in the form of a cylinder six inches in diameter is suspended above the platform 14 by means of a conventional air lift 48. The air lift is adapted to lift the weight 46 up until it is four inches above the plane of the platform whereupon the weight drops by free fall onto the platform. A conventional cyclic timer 50 controls the dropping rate to twelve cycles or blows per minute. The platform is subjected to five hundred blows after which it is removed from the wood frame and allowed to relax for thirty minutes. The distance across the central area of the body 0f the platform in a direction parallel to the sides is again measured between the inner edge of each of the same two opposite openings 18 with the platform at room temperature. The permanent set is determined by the following formula:

Distance After Founding-Original D'stance Original Distance -=Percent Permanent Set.

Durometer, Shore A, ASTM D67659TMinimum 55;

Maximum 80 Modulus at 50% Elongation, ASTM De412-62T-150 to Tear Rlesistance, ASTM D-624-54, die C--At least 100 lbs./ inch minimum Tension Set, ASTM D-412-62T-35% maximum but preferably maximum.

The compounding of rubber and other elastomers to the above specifications is well known in the art. In general the thickness of the platform is from about 0.015 to about 0.150 but depending upon the article of furniture at hand other thicknesses may be employed.

In research work it was found that a platform with the above stated physical characteristic did not rupture under the test for permanent set and the percentage of permanent set did not exceed fifteen percent. With a permanent set of not more than fifteen percent the seating comfort was satisfactory for the range of installment tension conventionally employed. Preferably the percent of permanent set is not more than ve percent for best results.

As a specific embodiment of the invention, the following elastomer formulation was prepared from the indicated ingredients and proportions thereof expressed in parts by weight:

Proportion 100 10 Ingredient:

Natural rubber E.P.C. carbon black S.R.F. carbon black Zinc oxide Sulfur N isopropyl N phenyl-p-phenylene diamine (antiozonant) Saturated polymerized petroleum hydrocarbon 1 (plasticizer) 3.0 Stearic acid 1.5 Phenyl-p-naphthylamine (antioxidant) 1.0 N cyclohexyl 2 benzothiozolesulfenomide (accelerator) Petroleum hydrocarbon wax2 1.0` 1 This extender had a viscosity (Saybolt Furol) at 140 F. of 250 to 350 seconds.

2This wax had a viscosity (ASTM D-446) at 210 F. of

SUS maximum, a melting point (ASTM D-SI) of 150 l?.

minimum, a specific gravity at 60 F. of 0.928 and an 011 content (ASTM D-721) of 0.5 maximum.

The foregoing formulation was cured under heat and pressure in a platform mold and the resulting platform had the following physical properties:

Accordingly, the final platform had the essential controlled and correlated physical properties and was capable of providing the previously-described advantages and benefits of the invention.

As used in the description the term furniture includes all the usual household furniture such as beds, chairs, sofas, day beds and the like as Well as the usual furniture in trains, busses, airplanes, ships and the like. The frame of the furniture need not be wood and may be made of metal or the plastic materials conventionally employed.

It will be understood that it is intended to cover all changes and modifications of the preferred form of invention herein chosen for the purpose of illustration which changes and modifications do not constitute a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention.

What is claimed is:

1. A support member comprising an elastomeric platform having a durometer, Shore A, ASTM D-676-59T hardness of about 55 to about 80, a modulus at 50% elongation, ASTM D-412-62T `from about 150 to 600 p.s.i., a tear resistance, ASTM D-624-54 die C of at least pounds per inch and a tension set, ASTM D-412- 62T of not more than about 35%, a plurality of straps of textile fabric, a furniture frame, said straps being attached to the furniture frame and to the platform to suspend such platform in the frame of the furniture.

2. A structure as specified in claim 1 in which said platform has a plurality of openings therein and in which the straps are attached to the platform lby means of said openings.

3. A structure as specified in claim 1 in which the straps are looped through the said openings and both of the arms of the loops are attached to the furniture.

4. A structure as specied in claim 1 in which the platform is rubber.

5. A support member comprising an elastomeric platform having a durometer, Shore A, ASTM D-676-59T hardness of about 55 to about 80, a modulus at 50% elongation, ASTM D-41262T from about 150 to 600 p.s.i., a tear resistance, ASTM D-624-54 die C of at least about 100 pounds per inch and a tension set, ASTM D-412-62T of not more than about 35% and a permanent set of not more than about 15%, a furniture frame, a plurality of straps Which have an elastic resiliency of less than one-half the elastic resiliency of said platform, said straps being attached to the furniture frame and to the platform to suspend the platform in the frame of the furniture.

6. A structure as specified in claim 5 in which the straps are resilient textile fabric.

References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,163,359 6/1939 Van Derveer 160-378 2,932,871 4/1960 Phillips et al. 297--385 X 3,037,766 6/1962 Berg 267-110 3,117,819 1/1964 Kudriavetz 160-378 X 3,179,469 4/1965 Heuston 297-452 3,208,085 9/ 1965 Grimshaw. 3,375,861 4/1968 Marlow 160-371 FOREIGN PATENTS 800,828 9/ 1958 Great Britain.

REINALDO P. MACHADO, Primary Examiner PHILIP C. KANNAN, Assistant Examiner U.S. Cl. X.R.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2163359 *Aug 7, 1937Jun 20, 1939Karpen & Bros SSeat back and the like and method of forming
US2932871 *Jul 16, 1956Apr 19, 1960Hastings Mfg CoAnchors for safety belts and the like
US3037766 *Mar 8, 1960Jun 5, 1962Berg LaderResilient support for furnitures
US3117819 *Mar 5, 1962Jan 14, 1964Acushnet Process CompanyResilient chair support
US3179469 *Mar 18, 1963Apr 20, 1965Acushnet Process CompanyElastomer furniture support
US3208085 *Nov 19, 1962Sep 28, 1965Vitafoam LtdResilient cushion
US3375861 *Aug 10, 1964Apr 2, 1968Pirelli LtdSupport members
GB800828A * Title not available
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3888029 *Feb 1, 1974Jun 10, 1975Nat Advertising CompanyChangeable multiple image display apparatus
US5027459 *Apr 10, 1989Jul 2, 1991Perry Jr Leroy RAuxiliary frame and grid and interaction with mattress periphery
US6994401 *Sep 6, 2001Feb 7, 2006Lear CorporationSeat backrest cover module
US7455274 *Oct 24, 2003Nov 25, 2008Sutherland Jeffrey DCarrier for various-sized articles operatively supported by a vehicle
US7640611Jan 25, 2005Jan 5, 2010Kluft Earl SMattress design
US7917980Dec 29, 2009Apr 5, 2011Kluft Earl SMattress design
US20120018607 *Feb 9, 2010Jan 26, 2012Illinois Tool Works Inc.Molded load bearing surface and method of manufacture
WO1990011710A1 *Apr 9, 1990Oct 11, 1990Earl KluftAuxiliary frame and grid and interaction with mattress periphery
Classifications
U.S. Classification267/110, 160/385, 297/452.56, 160/378
International ClassificationA47C7/22
Cooperative ClassificationA47C7/282, Y10S297/02
European ClassificationA47C7/28A