Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3517514 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateJun 30, 1970
Filing dateMar 8, 1968
Priority dateMar 8, 1968
Publication numberUS 3517514 A, US 3517514A, US-A-3517514, US3517514 A, US3517514A
InventorsVisser Christiaan
Original AssigneeB M A Batenburg, C J Vrendenberg, Ver Touwfabrieken Nv
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Soil protection mats
US 3517514 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

C. VISSER ATTORNEY June 30, 1970 SOIL PROTECTION MATS Filed March 8, 1968 T R C N r/g. Y N m H m M 2 5% w 9A a a N a w V. g mm w M2. 5 a c W ya, a F 0 5w my; w MMZMW m WW A 0 5 F E M; a Z; k W Z? ZR 2 Ki, 3 if 22 Z L w? W 5.x NZ i M/ Z5? 5,; Q 050 F/ Z156 Z i 5 MM; NZ f M 0 f 6 f. fl z E am N N 10 m P 7 W 7 l 2 P H $3. 2 M m it. C a W a; 8 2% 2? may. p a J 5 i: ii mama United States Patent 3,517,514 SOIL PROTECTION MATS Christiaan Visser, deceased, late of Berwijk, Netherlands, by B. M. A. Batenburg, executor, Beverwijk, Netherlands, assignor to C. J. Vrendenberg, Nunspeet, and N.V. Vereenigde Touwfabrieken, Rotterdam, Netherlands Filed Mar. 8, 1968, Ser. No. 712,336

Int. Cl. E02!) 3/12 UtS.Cl. 61--38 10 Claims v.used. They resist attack by Erioc'heir sinensis. Combinations ofnatural and synthetic fibers are employed; the decay of the former restores porosity to the fabric when soil tends to clog the same Bundles of long loose fibers are fastened in the mats. They extend upwardly therefrom into the water. They cause mud particles in the water to deposit on the mats. This aids in securing the mats and in land reclamation work Waffle-like formation may be used. The ribs strengthen the fabric. The compartments between ribs are thin and have relatively great permeability. Ribs or strips of polyester material reinforced with glassfiber may be attached. Strength and rigidity; are correspondingly increased.

- SPECIFICATION Field of the invention withthe aid of stakes, piles, or pegs.

Description of the prior art Dutch patent application 192,274 describes a bottom covering consisting of a number of flexible and elastic foils of synthetic material of very small thickness. Such bottom coverings have disadvantages. They shut oil the soil completely, as a result of which seeping water cannot be let through, causing buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the mats tending to displace or damage them. Moreover such thin foils are vulnerable to puncture and tearing, and special measures must be taken to protect them from damage.

So-calIed technical fabric has also been used as material for the protection of the soil. This fabric consists of fine-mesh woven material, usually fine-mesh. woven .synthetic threads. The si zes of the meshes are so chosenthat they prevent passage of soil material therethrough, while permitting water seeping from the soil to pass through the meshes. Such technical-fabric has the disadvantage that the fine meshes in the longrun'become' clogged: as a result of whichthe' s'oil 'is"again shut offcompletely, with the above-mentioned disadvantages." An additional serious disadvantages of the woven materials as the phenomenon that at the place where the fabric is fastened to the soil jthe meshesabout the fastening stake or peg become wider, permitting the underlying soil to be washed away. In fact, because an opening is made in the fabric by the pile orlthe peg, at thatpoint the threads of the woof Patented June 30, 1970 as well as the warp threads are bound to diverge from each other, as a result of which an area with wider meshes is formed around the opening, through which loose constituents of the soil may be washed away.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION By the present invention mats are provided for the protection of soil from flowing water which do not present the above-mentioned disadvantages. According to the invention this object is achieved by the provision of a revetment comprising mats which consist essentially of fibers which are randomly oriented and intertwined by non-woven techniques known per se. The present invention has disclosed a unique advantage of this sort of revetment in that when the mats of randomly oriented fibers are pierced by stakes, piles, or pegs, the randomly oriented fibers compact into a dense ring about the fastening piles or pegs and in effect constitute a protective collar thereabout, and no inadmissibly large openings are formed anywhere in the mats. It has also disclosed that owing to the relatively loose connection between the fibers and their random orientation the mats can conform themselves closely to the surface configuration of the underlying soil without cracking, splitting or tearing.

In the preferred practice of the invention the size of the fibers and the non-woven technique are selected to produce mats which have sufi'icient porosity to permit passage of seeping water therethrough and in which owing to the sizes and forms of the passages present between the fibers in the vertical direction no solid soil particles can escape through the mat.

The mats of the invention may be formed of natural or synthetic textile material. In a preferred embodiment synthetic fibers are employed. These fibers are not attacked by the water and can easily be worked up into non-woven fabrics, while they have great tensile strength, as a result of which the mats made from them are very strong and practically immune from damage by sharp objects. In one preferred embodiment the mats are formed of polypropylene fiber, which appears to have the special advantage of not being attacked by Eriocheir sinensis. The mats can be produced in great lengths and of any desired thickness and strength, and can be fastened together in conventional manners.

In one advantageous embodiment the mats are made from a combination of natural and synthetic fibers. In this arrangement the decay of the natural fibers reestablishes porosity of the mats, or can even increase the size of the openings therein, after prolonged periods of use.

In another desirable embodiment of the inevntion the mats are provided on the surface in a number of places with bundles of long, loose fibers fastened in the mats. These bundles of fibers will extend in the water upwardly from-the surface of the mats and thus form a means for detaining mud particles from the water. Thus in this embodiment the mats for the protection of the soil may serve at the same time as devices for the deposition and collection of mud for weighting down the mats or for aiding in land reclamation works.- 1 1 In further embodiments the mats of the invention are densified on one or both of the surfaces, so as to adjust the openings therein to control their permeability for water. When synthetic fibers are used, this densification of the surface can be achieved in a very simple way by subjecting the surfaces of the mats to a heat-treatment similar to so-called heat sealing but conducted only to the extent appropriate to achieve the desired permeability control.

In yet another embodiment of the invention the tensile strengths of the mats are increased very considerably by the provision of'an additional quantity of fibrous material in the form of strips extending over the length and the width of the mats, so that compartments with relatively great permeabiliy are present between the strips, producing a somewhat wafile-like construction, and in order to ensure greater rigidity and strength, the mats may, for instance, be provided in a simple way with strengthening strips of polyester material reinforced with glass fiber.

The mats may be applied to horizontal and sloped surfaces or even in vertical positions, behind rows of pales, for example.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS In the accompanying diagrammatic drawings:

FIG. 1 represents a section of an embodiment of revetment mat used in and constituting a part of this invention; FIG. 2 represents a section of a second embodiment;

FIG. 3 represents a stake driven through the cmbodiment of FIG. 1 and into an underlying terrain, and illustrates the effect thereof on the mat, and

FIGS. 4 and 5 represent sections of further embodiments.

DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Referring to FIG. 1, in its simplest embodiment the invention comprises a revetment mat of non-woven fabric of randomly oriented fibers 10. The mat is prepared by the known techniques employed in the textile art for forming non-woven fabrics, and is preferably relatively thin and strong so that a roll thereof may cover a substantial area of soil to be protected. While the thickness and density of the non-woven fabric may be varied within quite wide limits, determined in part by the nature of the soil and violence of the water flow to be coped with, thicknesses of one-eighth to one-half inch or so are preferred, or the mat may be of varied thickness comprising freely pervious areas 11 and strengthening areas 12 for example, of the waflle-like form illustrated in FIG. 2.

When the revetment mats so formed, as illustrated in FIG. 3, are pierced by a stake, peg, or pile 15 driven through the mat or mats and into the underlying soil, the randomly oriented fibers thereof compact into a denser ring 16 around the fastening pile or peg 15. The more dense structure of the collar area guards against washing away of the soil proximate to the stake or pile 15, and the porosity of the randomly oriented structure in surrounding relation to the collar 16 is not altered or opened up by the securement.

For long life and resistance to decay the mats are preferably made of, or comprise structurally stabilizing proportions of, decay resistant fibers, polypropylene fiber being preferred. In certain instances it is desirable to combine with the structurally stabilizing quantity of polypropylene fiber or the like, a filling quantity of natural fiber susceptible to bio-chemical degradation. As will be evident from FIG. 4 the decay of the natural fiber 17 in use will produce further voids in the mat structurally stabilized by the synthetic fiber 18, thereby increasing its porosity to compensate for clogging of various pores therein.

In the embodiment of FIG. 5, the flexible mat 20 is provided in a number of places on its surface with bundles of long, loose fibers 21 fastened in the mats. These fibers 21 may be from one to many inches long and the bundles may be suitably spaced apart, preferably by distances approximating the length of the fibers 21, to perform the desired function of trapping mud particles carried by the flowing water for causing deposition of mud on the mat for aiding in retaining it in place, and for causing accretion in land reclamation work, for which the longer fibers 21 are particularly desirable. As illustrated in this embodiment the mats may be stiffened and strengthened by strips 22 of polyester material reinforced with glass fiber, which may be bonded to the randomly oriented fibers by an adhesive coating, a mutual solvent for causing adhesion,

and/ or by fusing or sealing together by the application of heat as previously described.

While there have been described herein what are at present considered preferred embodiments of the invention, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that minor modifications and changes may be made Without departing from the essence of the invention. It is therefore understood that the exemplary embodiments are illustrative and not restrictive of the invention, the scope of which is defined in the appended claims, and that all modifications that come within the meaning and range of equivalents of the claims are intended to be included therein.

What is claimed is:

1. The combination with an area of soil juxtaposed to flowing water of a revetment covering, said revetment covering comprising (a) a number of flexible revetment mats fastened together and to said area of soil,

(b) said revetment mats being formed of non-woven fabric of randomly oriented fibers.

2. A combination as claimed in claim 1, in which (c) said revetment mats of randomly oriented fibers comprise at least a structurally stabilizing proportion of synthetic fiber.

3. A combination as claimed in claim 1, in which (0) said revetment mats of randomly oriented fibers comprise at least a structurally stabilizing proportion of polypropylene fibers.

4. A combination as claimed in claim 1, in which (c) said revetment mats of randomly oriented fibers comprise a structurally stabilizing proportion of synthetic fibers and a filling proportion of biodegradable fibers the decay of which augments the porosity of the mats.

5. A combination as claimed in claim 1, in which (c) said revetment mats of randomly oriented fibers are provided with bundles of long loose fibers fastened in the mats and extending upwardly from the upper surfaces thereof.

6. A combination as claimed in claim 1, in which (c) said revetment mats of randomly oriented fibers are more dense in at least one of their surfaces than in regions removed from the surfaces thereof. 7. A combination as claimed in claim 1, in which (0) said revetment mats are secured by stakes, the

randomly oriented fibers of said mats forming densified collars adjacent to said stakes.

8. A combination as claimed in claim 1, in which (c) said revetment mats of randomly oriented fibers are provided on their surfaces with strips of additional material.

9. A combination as claimed in claim 8, in which said strips of additional material are arranged perpendicular to each other imparting a wafile-like formation to the revetment mats.

10. A combination as claimed in claim 8, in which said strips consist of polyester reinforced with glass fiber.

References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 826,619 7/1906 Smith 61-38 1,859,923 5/1932 Hough 61-38 2,172,409 9/1939 Rex 6l-38 3,097,413 7/ 1963 Draper 2872.2 X 3,299,640 1/1967;' Nielsen 613 3,360,421 12/1967 Sands 2872.2 X 3,377,231 4/ 1968 Newman 2872.2 X 3,401,467 9/ 1968 Koester.

DAVID J. WILLIAMOWSKY, Primary Examiner P. C. KANNAN, Assistant Examiner

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US826619 *Mar 28, 1906Jul 24, 1906Walter A SmithRevetment.
US1859923 *Mar 11, 1929May 24, 1932Woods Brothers Construction CoMethod and apparatus for anchorage of mattresses to screen poles
US2172409 *Nov 8, 1937Sep 12, 1939Rex Alfred GMattress
US3097413 *May 26, 1960Jul 16, 1963Draper Brothers CompanyUnwoven papermaker's felt
US3299640 *Dec 31, 1963Jan 24, 1967Roblon AsMeans for influencing the sub-marine migration of material
US3360421 *Apr 23, 1965Dec 26, 1967Du PontBonded nonwoven backing material having perforate selvage and carpet made therefrom
US3377231 *Jun 11, 1964Apr 9, 1968Kendall & CoNeedled textile laminates and method for producing same
US3401467 *Jun 5, 1967Sep 17, 1968Orr Felt & Blanket CompanyPaper makers' felt
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3670506 *May 17, 1971Jun 20, 1972RhodiacetaProcess for stabilizing soils
US3696623 *Jun 29, 1971Oct 10, 1972Hoechst AgWoven mat
US3722222 *Mar 9, 1971Mar 27, 1973Bitumarin NvSupport means for slope revetments
US4002034 *Jun 25, 1975Jan 11, 1977Walter MuhringMatting for the prevention of hydraulic erosion
US4098955 *Oct 7, 1976Jul 4, 1978E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And CompanyPrevention of shipworm infestation of wooden marine structures
US4135843 *Jul 21, 1977Jan 23, 1979Construction Techniques, Inc.Erosion control mat
US4168335 *Feb 22, 1978Sep 18, 1979Akzona IncorporatedUnderwater terrain reinforcement matting
US4242010 *Aug 14, 1978Dec 30, 1980Ingenior F. Selmer ASMethod and means for protecting a sea bottom surface and an installation on same
US4337007 *Mar 25, 1980Jun 29, 1982Imperial Chemical Industries LimitedUnderwater erosion control structure
US5007766 *Nov 27, 1989Apr 16, 1991Synthetic Industries, Inc.Shaped barrier for erosion control and sediment collection
US5651641 *May 31, 1995Jul 29, 1997Nicolon CorporationGeosynthetics
US5735982 *Mar 10, 1995Apr 7, 1998American Excelsior CompanyErosion control blanket and method of manufacture
US5786281 *Feb 3, 1997Jul 28, 1998American Excelsior CompanyErosion control blanket and method of manufacture
US5795835 *Aug 14, 1996Aug 18, 1998The Tensar CorporationBonded composite knitted structural textiles
US5965467 *Sep 2, 1997Oct 12, 1999The Tensar CorporationBonded composite open mesh structural textiles
US6020275 *May 9, 1996Feb 1, 2000The Tensar CorporationBonded composite open mesh structural textiles
US6056479 *Sep 2, 1997May 2, 2000The Tensar CorporationBonded composite open mesh structural textiles
US6729807Nov 7, 2002May 4, 2004Profile Products L.L.C.Integral lofty polymer grid and fiber web matrix turf reinforcement mats
US7001111Oct 24, 2003Feb 21, 2006Maxwell Victoria HLandscape/erosion control product
US7484330Feb 10, 2006Feb 3, 2009Terra-Mulch Products LlcBlended mulch product and method of making same
US7681353Feb 10, 2006Mar 23, 2010Terra-Mulch Products LlcErosion control medium
US7966765Dec 24, 2008Jun 28, 2011Terra-Mulch Products, LlcBlended mulch product and method of making same
US8256158Jul 2, 2009Sep 4, 2012Profile Products LlcVisual attenuation compositions and methods of using the same
US8555544Jul 2, 2009Oct 15, 2013Profile Products L.L.C.Visual attenuation compositions and methods of using the same
US20040091326 *Nov 7, 2002May 13, 2004Profile Products L.L.C.Integral lofty polymer grid and fiber web matrix turf reinforcement mats
US20040202851 *Apr 8, 2003Oct 14, 2004Goodrum Richard A.Turf reinforcement mat composite including support mat core and attached fiber matrix
US20050089376 *Oct 24, 2003Apr 28, 2005Maxwell Victoria H.Landscape/erosion control product
US20070003369 *Jul 1, 2005Jan 4, 2007Hanson Robert NSediment control wattle
US20070180763 *Feb 10, 2006Aug 9, 2007Lougheed Doris EBlended mulch product and method of making same
US20070184744 *Feb 10, 2006Aug 9, 2007Lougheed Doris EErosion control medium
US20070186463 *Feb 15, 2006Aug 16, 2007Lougheed Doris EBlended mulch products for spray application to a surface
US20090120148 *Dec 24, 2008May 14, 2009Terra-Mulch Products LlcBlended mulch product and method of making same
US20120034039 *Feb 9, 2012Victoria Lynn Hawkins-MaxwellLandscape Erosion Control Fabric with Mulch Blocking Members
US20150104257 *Oct 10, 2013Apr 16, 2015Watershed Geosynthetics LlcFormed in place filled structure with synthetic turf
DE2431043A1 *Jun 27, 1974Jan 8, 1976Naue Kg E A HMat for protection against water erosion - has sandwich construction with reduced water flow resistance on landward side
U.S. Classification405/19
International ClassificationE02B3/12
Cooperative ClassificationE02B3/126
European ClassificationE02B3/12C5
Legal Events
Oct 11, 1983AS02Assignment of assignor's interest
Owner name: KONO, ALEXANDER C.
Effective date: 19830921
Oct 11, 1983ASAssignment
Effective date: 19830921