|Publication number||US3520091 A|
|Publication date||Jul 14, 1970|
|Filing date||Aug 24, 1967|
|Priority date||Aug 24, 1967|
|Publication number||US 3520091 A, US 3520091A, US-A-3520091, US3520091 A, US3520091A|
|Inventors||Raphael Osmond Philip|
|Original Assignee||Raphael Osmond Philip|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (6), Referenced by (17), Classifications (8)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
July 14, 1970 o. P. RAPHAEL 3,520,091
METHOD OF GRINDING THE EDGES OF LENSES Filed Aug. 24, 1967 LENS TEMPLATE SHAPED U G FINISHED I BLANK LENS N PfE A GUIDED LIG T I, W
GRINDING GRINDHING BY OPERATION OPERATION My 1' C410, F76. 5 ATTORNEYS United States Patent US. Cl. 51-284 4 Claims ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE For smoothly grinding the edge of a lens a first template-guided grinding operation is carried out in a conventional manner, followed by a second grinding operation in a lightweight machine devoid of template guidance.
This invention relates to a method of grinding the edges of lenses, for example spectacle lenses.
The conventional method, as described for example in British patent specification No. 788,471, is to press the edge of the lens against a revolving abrasive Wheel while slowly rotating the lens about an axis, the distance between this axis and the axis of rotation of the abrasive wheel being controlled by a template which determines the ultimate size and shape of the lens. The cross-section of the ground edge of the lens is determined by the shape of that part of the periphery of the abrasive wheel which comes into contact with the lens.
When the abrasive medium is relatively coarse, as is usually the case, especially with diamond particles which are often used for this purpose, there is a corresponding coarseness of the ground surface of the edge of the lens. This coarseness is manifest in two ways. Firstly, it is apparent on any part of the edge of the lens which has been ground approximately flat, such as bevel faces. Secondly, it is apparent on the continuous peripheral line where the ground edge of the lens meets the clear front or rear surface of the lens. The latter effect is usually the more important, particularly in the case of spectacle lenses.
The main object of the invention is to provide a method for reducing such coarseness of the ground edge of the lens.
Other objects will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the following description.
According to the invention, these and other objects are achieved by carrying out a template-guided first edge grinding operation in a grinding machine, e.g. in the conventional manner, and then subjecting the lens to a second edge grinding operation in another grinding machine free from template guidance and in which a lighter contact pressure is applied than in the first grinding operation.
Owing to the light pressure applied in the second operation, only a small amount of material is removed, so template control is unnecessary, the edge of the lens itself providing sufficient guidance.
The force with which the lens is held against the abrasive wheel may be due solely to the weight of the lens and its holding mechanism, and no additional loading need be provided as would normally be the case in the template-controlled first edge grinding operation. Indeed, if desired, the force could be reduced even further, for example by supporting some of the weight of the said parts by a spring or counterweight.
The second edge grinding operation may be carried out with the same or a different abrasive wheel to that used in the first operation. Preferably, a different abrasive wheel is used, the surface of which is such that a variation in the cross-section of the ground edge is thereby produced. For example, if the cross section of the lens edge 3,520,091 Patented July 14, 1970 ice produced by the first operation is a V of 120 included angle, the second operation may provide smaller included angle of, say, It is not essential for the modified cross-section to apply to both sides of the lens, since the effect of the coarseness of the first grinding operation is normally most apparent at the edge of a convex lens surface. For example, in the case of a lens of convexconcave form the edge may first be ground to a V crosssection of included angle, the V being symmetrical. The second grinding operation may be performed on a grinding wheel having a V groove one flank of which is at the same angle as the rear flank of the V, i.e. 60 from a plane normal to the wheel axis, but with its front flank inclined at a steeper angle, say 30, from the said plane, so that a chamfer or bevel is ground at the peripheral edge between the convex surface of the lens and the front face of the original 120 V.
Preferably the groove of the grinding wheel of this machine has an included angle of less than 120, which groove may be asymmetrical with respect to a plane normal to the axis of the grinding wheel.
Since the lens is only lightly pressed against the grinding wheel and is free from template control, in some cases there may be a risk of vibration of the lens. The apparatus may include a vibration damping device operative on the lens-supporting head to smooth out vibration of the head and hence of the lens, thereby providing a more even contact with the grinding wheel and a yet smoother finish.
The invention may be performed in various ways, and a specific embodiment will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a plan view of an edge grinding machine used in the second stage of the method embodying the invention;
FIG. 2 is a side view looking in the direction of the arrow II in FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is an enlarged fragmentary view of a grinding wheel for grinding a V on the edge of a lens in a conventional manner; and
FIG. 4 is an enlarged fragmentary view of a grinding wheel in the machine used to carry out the present invention; and FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating the method according to the present invention.
Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, the machine comprises a lens mounting head 10 which is of lightweight construction of generally H shape configuration in plan. It is pivoted on a horizontal shaft 11 so as to be movable up and down in the direction of the arrow A in FIG. 2. The horizontal shaft 11 is supported in a yoke 12 which is pivotally mounted on a vertical post 13 so that the head 10 can swing laterally in the direction of the arrow B in FIG. 1.
The lens 14 has already had a V section edge ground thereon, this edge having an included angle of 120. It has been ground in a conventional edge-grinding machine using a grinding wheel 15 (FIG. 3) having therein a symmetrical groove of 120 included angle. The conventional machine in question grinds the V section edge by applying the lens 14 to the grinding wheel 15, the lens being slowly rotated about its optical axis and the grinding wheel being rotated at high speed. The lens is applied to the grinding wheel 15 with substantial pressure, and a template shaped to correspond with the desired profile of the lens limits the extent to which the lens can be ground away and so determines the shape of the lens. Thus this first grinding operation is under template control or guidance.
For the finishing operation in the machine as illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2 the lens 14 is clamped between two pads 16 and 17 in the front of the head 10. The pad 16 is mounted on the inner end of a shaft 18 which is journalled in a portion 19 of the head so as to be rotatable therein but not movable axially. The other pad 17 is mounted on a shaft 20 which is journalled in a formation 21 of the head so as to be rotatable therein together with an outer tubular shaft 22, and to be movable axially. The pad 17 and its shaft 20 are urged to the left in FIG. 1 by means of a light coil spring 23, and can be withdrawn towards the right in FIG. 1 to release the lens 14 by pulling a knob 24 attached to the end of the shaft 20.
Th shaft 11 is rotatable and at its left hand end in FIG. 1 is connected by means of universal joints 25 and 26 and a somewhat flexible shaft 27 to reduction gearing 28 associated with an electric motor 29. During operation of the machine the motor 29 rotates the shaft 11 slowly at a uniform speed, the transmission shaft arrangement 25, 26, 27 permitting lateral movements of the head 10 in the direction of the arrow B.
Fixed to the shaft 11 at each side of the head 10 are sprockets 30 and 31. Corresponding sprockets 32 and 33 are fixed to the shafts 18 and 22 respectively. Pivotally mounted on the shaft 11 are arms 34 and 35 which carry at their forward ends idler sprockets 36 and 37. A chain 38 connects the sprockets 30 and 32, the upper run of the chain being tensioned by the idler sprocket 36, while another chain 39 connects the sprockets 31 and 33, the upper run of this chain being tensioned by the idler sprocket 37. Thus the slow rotation of the shaft 11 produces corresponding slow rotation of the shafts 18 and 20 and of the lens 14 clamped between the pads 16 and 17. Below the front of the head 10 there is a grinding wheel 40 the shaft of which is supported in bearing blocks 41. This shaft 42 carries a belt pulley- 43 which is connected by a belt 44 and a corresponding pulley to an electric motor (not shown) which rotates the grinding wheel 40 at high speed.
As shown in FIG. 4 the grinding wheel 40 has a circumferential groove the right-hand flank 45 of which makes an angle of to a vertical plane through the base of the groove, the slope of this flank thus corresponding to the slope of the right-hand flank of the grinding wheel 15 in FIG. 3. The left-hand flank 40, on the other hand, makes an angle of only 30 with this vertical plane, in contrast to the 60 angle of the left-hand flank in FIG. 3.
Extending rearwardly from the head 10 is a rod 47, and pivotally attached thereto is a vertical rod 48 carrying at its lower end adisc 49. This disc is immersed in a viscous liquid in a container 50. These parts constitute a damping device whereby any tendency to rapid vertical vibration of the head 10 will be resisted by the viscosity of the liquid whereas slow movements such as are produced by the slow rotation of the non-circular lens 14 are not appreciably resisted.
In operation, the slowly rotating lens 14, upon which a 120 bevel has already been formed by coarse grinding on the wheel 15, is allowed to come into contact with the rapidly rotating grinding wheel 40. The rear right-hand or flank of the V-shaped edge of the lens 14 will make line contact with the flank 45 of the groove in the wheel 40 since both have the same angle of slope. The lefthand or front flank of the lens edge, however, is at a different angle of slope from the left-hand flank 46 of the groove in the wheel 40 so that this flank will grind away a bevel or chamfer 51 on the front peripheral edge of the lens 14, i.e. where the front flank of the V-shaped edge meets the convex front surface 52 of the lens..This bevel or chamfer 51 -will eliminate coarseness at the said peripheral edge. Such an operation is shown schematically in FIG. 5 of the drawings.
A lubricant such as water can be applied to the grinding surfaces during the grinding operation in a conventional manner.
What .I claim is:
1. A method of grinding the edge of a lens which comprises carrying out a template-guided first edge grinding operation on said lens in a grinding machine using a first grinding wheel having a V-section groove in its periphery and then subjecting said lens to a second edge grinding operation in another grinding machine using a second grinding wheel having a V-section groove in its periphery, said lens being supported in a lens holder and a lighter contact pressure being applied in said second edge grinding operation than in said first edge grinding operation.
2. A method according to claim 1 in which said V-section groove of said second grinding wheel used in carrying out said second edge grinding operation has a smaller including angle than said V-section groove in said first grinding wheel.
3. A method according to claim 2 in which only one flank of said V-section groove in said second grinding wheel used in said second grinding operation is at a different slope from the corresponding flank of said V- section groove in said first grinding wheel used in said first grinding operation.
4. A method according to claim 3 applied to a lens having a convex surface on one side and a concave surface on the other side, the convex surface of said lens being on the same side as said flank of different slope in said second grinding operation.
References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,145,194 7/1915 Hansen 51--101 X 1,223,792 4/1917 Jeffrey et al. 51105 1,449,266 3/1923 Clarke 5ll0l 1,929,746 10/1933 Kurath 51105 2,293,291 8/1942 Gaspari.
2,747,337 5/ 1956 Geula 51-101 LESTER M. SWINGLE, Primary Examiner US. Cl. X.R. 51101,
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US1145194 *||May 5, 1914||Jul 6, 1915||Marinius Hansen||Machine for grooving lenses.|
|US1223792 *||May 14, 1914||Apr 24, 1917||Joseph A Jeffery||Apparatus for use in manufacturing articles of ceramic material.|
|US1449266 *||Apr 7, 1921||Mar 20, 1923||Clarke Edward W||Machine for grinding the edges of lenses|
|US1929746 *||Feb 25, 1929||Oct 10, 1933||Economy Fuse And Mfg Co||Grinding machine|
|US2293291 *||May 29, 1940||Aug 18, 1942||Gaspari & Co Inc J||Lens grinding machine|
|US2747337 *||Sep 2, 1953||May 29, 1956||Geula John H||Automatic edge grinder for optical lenses|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3834089 *||Feb 12, 1973||Sep 10, 1974||Raphaels Ltd||Monowheel plastic lens edger|
|US3894361 *||Sep 3, 1974||Jul 15, 1975||Dimelp Optical Co Inc||Lens grinding machine|
|US3919811 *||Apr 25, 1974||Nov 18, 1975||Lars Hedelin||Grinding wheel for forming a facet on the periphery of an eyeglass lens|
|US4084352 *||Mar 1, 1977||Apr 18, 1978||Wheeler Bradford J||Lapidary machine|
|US4373298 *||Jan 30, 1981||Feb 15, 1983||Coburn Optical Industries, Inc.||Automatic edge beveller for removing the sharp peripheral edges of ophthalmic lenses|
|US4807398 *||Nov 14, 1983||Feb 28, 1989||Ait Industries, Inc.||Lens edging machine|
|US4885875 *||Dec 30, 1987||Dec 12, 1989||Soper Peter H||Lens edging machine and method|
|US5410843 *||May 16, 1991||May 2, 1995||Wernicke X Co. Gmbh||Process for finishing the edge of corrective lenses made of plastic|
|US5954567 *||Oct 2, 1997||Sep 21, 1999||Ngk Insulators, Ltd.||Process for machining an edge portion of a ceramic article preform without chipping|
|US6328630 *||Oct 4, 1999||Dec 11, 2001||Hoya Corporation||Eyeglass lens end face machining method|
|US7403346 *||Jul 18, 2006||Jul 22, 2008||Nike, Inc.||Inclined-edged sports lens|
|US9102030 *||Jun 27, 2011||Aug 11, 2015||Corning Incorporated||Edge finishing apparatus|
|US20080024716 *||Jul 18, 2006||Jan 31, 2008||Reichow Alan W||Inclined-edge sports lens|
|US20120009854 *||Jun 27, 2011||Jan 12, 2012||Charles Michael Darcangelo||Edge finishing apparatus|
|US20150306726 *||Jul 7, 2015||Oct 29, 2015||Corning Incorporated||Edge finishing apparatus|
|WO2008010860A2 *||Apr 16, 2007||Jan 24, 2008||Nike International Ltd., A Corporation Of The Bermuda Islands||Inclined-edge sports lens|
|WO2008010860A3 *||Apr 16, 2007||Oct 30, 2008||Nike Inc An Oregon Corp||Inclined-edge sports lens|
|U.S. Classification||451/43, 451/249, 451/240, 451/256|
|International Classification||B24B9/06, B24B9/14|