Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3520263 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateJul 14, 1970
Filing dateSep 16, 1968
Priority dateSep 16, 1968
Publication numberUS 3520263 A, US 3520263A, US-A-3520263, US3520263 A, US3520263A
InventorsBerry Robert D, Witcher Jay
Original AssigneeUs Navy
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Constant depth buoyancy system
US 3520263 A
Images(2)
Previous page
Next page
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Jilly 14, 170 D, BERRY ETAL 3,520,263

CONSTANT DEPTH BUOYANCY SYSTEM Filed Sept. 16, 1968 2 Sh eetsSheet 1 MGG 52%,, Pow ER CONTROL 1 SUPPLY ELECTRONICS I l I I7 FIG. I. T20

42 4s 50 PRESET ELECTRICAL DEPTH DEPTH SiGNAL M66 BUOYANCY Posmou VEHICLE w- 5 CONTROLLER z svsrsm 2 L 40 44 48 52 DEPTH SENSOR 58 HQ 2 INVENTORS.

GERALD F. BAKER AGENT.

y 1970 R. D. BERRY ETAL 3,520,263

CONSTANT DEPTH BUOYANCY SYSTEM Filed Sept. 16, 1968 2 Sheets-Sheet 2 DAHPING RATIO .9

REF. l

DEPTH United States Patent US. Cl. 11416 1 Claim ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE A constant depth control system for an ocean vehicle is provided which maintains a constant depth by adjusting the displacement of a rubber gas bag to achieve neutral buoyancy when a feed back pressure equals a reference pressure. The displacement of the gas bag is related to the differential pressure between the gas inside the bag and the water outside the bag. Rate feed back is electronically controlled so that when a design depth (sea pressure) is approached, bag displacement is automatically adjusted to reduce the velocity of the system. The system may be adjusted to be neutrally buoyant and at zero velocity at the precise time that a preset reference sea pressure is reached.

GOVERNMENT INTEREST The invention described herein may be manufactured and used by or for the Government of the United States of America for governmental purposes without the payment of any royalties thereon or therefor.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION For purposes of oceanographic study and exploration it is sometimes desirable to send a vessel to a predetermined submerged depth and to maintain the vessel at that depth.

Numerous systems have been suggested for effecting depth control by adjusting the buoyancy of a vessel including dropping ballast or releasing buoyant material; pumping water in and out of buoyancy tanks; and hovering controls by means of mechanical and fluid thrust devices.

The present invention relates to an improved system which maintains a constant depth of a vehicle by adjusting the displacement of a rubber gas bag to achieve neutral buoyancy when a predetermined reference pressure is equaled by feed-back pressure. The displacement of the gas bag is related to the differential pressure between the gas inside the bag and the water outside the bag. 7

The system according to the present invention is very stable and can be set to remain at a predetermined depth. The system does not require forward vehicle motion in order to maintain depth. Fuel may be supplied by a gas blow down system, pump or self pressuring fuel system.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING FIG. l is a diagrammatic view of one embodiment of the system;

FIG. 2 is a schematic of the system of FIG. 1, indicating the mode of operation;

FIG. 3 is a root locus plot of the system; and

FIG. 4 is a mathematical block diagram of the system.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The system shown in FIG. 1 comprises a flexible gas bag 12 consisting of rubber or the like. The gas bag shown is of cylindrical configuration with the ends of the cylinder confined by attachment of two circular end plates "ice 25, 26. The end plates are biased toward the center of the bag 12 by means of a tension spring 14. Spring 14 is fastened to the end plates 25, 26 by means of tubular guides 30, 31, respectively. The amount of gas 13 in gas bag 12 may be decreased by the opening of vent valve 15 or increased by supplying fuel from supply tank 17 to a monopropellant gas generator 11 by opening valve 16. Valves 15 and 16 may be electrically controlled from an electronic control center 19. Control center 19 is adapted to receive signals from a differential pressure transducer 23 and a sea pressure transducer 24 and to relate signals to a preset parameter representative of the pressure calculated for the desired depth to be maintained. A pay load 20, as well as other components such as the power supply 18 and the control section 19, may be hung from the guides 30, 31 by means of hangers such as 21, 22. It may be assembled with a minimum of effort and cost from hardware similar or identical to the hardware being tested for the Underwater Gas Generator programs now being conducted. Major components would include:

' (a) Pressurized hydrazine fuel tank 17 (b) Monopropellant gas generator (MGG) 11 (c) Flexible rubber gas bag 12 with rigid end plates 25,

26 pulled together with a heavy coil spring 14 (d) Two solenoid valves 15, 16 for filling and venting the gas bag 12 (e) Power source (battery) 18 (f) A differential pressure transducer 23 (g) A sea pressure transducer 24 (h) Control electronics 19 (i) Rope of sufficient length to recover system Items (a), (b), (c), and (i) may be found among items procured for the Navy deep sea recovery tests. Items ((1), (e), (f) and (g) are off-the-shelf items. The only item that needs to be custom fabricated is item (h), the control electronics.

The system maintains a constant depth by adjusting the displacement of the rubber gas bag to achieve neutral buoyancy when the feedback sea pressure equals the reference pressure. The displacement of the gas bag is related to the differential pressure between the gas inside the bag and the water outside the bag. The differential pressure is a function of the spring extension. As the bag fills with gas, the spring is extended creating more spring force which in turn requires a greater differential pressure to balance the greater spring force. If the bag vent valve is opened the gas escapes causing a reduction in spring extension and differential pressure. If the system should sink below the design depth (sea pressure) the control system would call for a greater differential pressure between the gas and water which would cause the fill valve to open sending hydrazine fuel into the monopropellant gas generator. The fuel would decompose into gas and enter the gas bag causing an extension of the spring and subsequent rise in differential pressure. This should cause positive buoyancy and a gradual rising of the system. The control electronics includes rate feedback so that as the design depth (sea pressure) is approached the bag displacement is adjusted to reduce the velocity of the system. If the control system is properly designed the vehicle should be neutrally buoyant and at zero velocity at the precise time that reference sea pressure is reached.

Reference is now made to FIGS. 3 and 4 wherein the following reference symbols are utilized for brevity of explanation.

G (s) =Depth controller transfer function K =Buoyancy controller transfer function G (s) =Gas bag and associated hardware transfer function K =Gas bag volume feedback transfer function G (s) :Vehicle dynamics transfer function K =Depth feedback transducer transfer function 4 The drag force is assumed proportional to the velocity for small 3c X l The heart of the system is the gas bag-MGG buoyancy v( 2 control system which is the inner control loop of the block (S) (s) diagram including K (s), G (s), and K Earlier analog studies of a nearly identical system for the Navys Moray 1 V vehicle indicated that there was no particular problem where associated with stabilizing the buoyancy system at a con- K zl D stant depth. For a constant depth, the closed loop transfer 10 function of the inner loop can be approximated by T vzm/ D Assume G (s) is a proportional plus reset plus rate conk troller with the following transfer function. 1 T 1 5 1 K because 1 s 1+ Ts) PV=MRT 1 V=MRT/P K|: T+Kd s (1+T/ R, T, P are nearly constant for a vehicle at constant s(1+ Ts) depth.

where M f M in- 0l1t) K= roportiona1ity constant =integration rate time constant 0 12' Kd=derivative constant f T=derivative filter time constant The block diagram is now 1 K (K +T +T/ 1 X d 8 T Y 10,, -kv X i s(1+Ts) (I-i-T S) s(1+T s) V o o n( T The closed loop transfer function:

where K la ni c l K K k G (s) is determined from the basic equations of motion, F =ma Water surface l depth vehicle W l o -DX W: weight of system in water B=buoyancy force D=drag coefficient F W-BDx=mx =W(S) -B (S) DSX :mS X

The forward transfer function, G(s), is

It would be desirable to choose the controller parameters in such a way that zeros occur between the dominant poles of the system transfer function, s=0, and

The buoyancy system time constant should be much smaller in all instances than the vehicles, i.e.,

For non-oscillatory response the zeros should be real. A good response can be achieved by selecting K =T and =8T The zeros then occur at T should be chosen less than T and should be small enough that both zeros are still negative real numbers.

In FIG. 3 is shown the root locus plot of the system. Since the endurance of the system is a function of fuel used, the primary consideration in the design of a long duration control system would be minimization of fuel consumption.

The response time of the system would not be a design consideration since no depth command changes would be desired. A very stable system with a high damping ratio would be ideal. The highest damping ratio that can be achieved for the system with the root locus of FIG. 3 is 0.9. A lower gain would result in a pole closer to the origin on the circle touching the origin. Therefore the angle formed by the line from that new pole to the origin and the negative real axis would be larger thus the damping ratio would be less. A higher gain would result in a pole further away from the real axis on the other branch of the locus. The angle between the line from this new pole to the origin and the negative real axis would be larger thus the damping ratio would be less. The location of the poles for the optimum gain are shown on the root locus plot.

What is claimed is:

1. A constant depth buoyancy system comprising:

flexible container means adapted to be compressed to a minimum internal volume and extended to a maximum internal volume;

said flexible member being substantially cylindrical and comprising a peripheral wall of rubber-like material and two end Walls; and biasing means between said end walls biasing said end walls toward a central position;

means for introducing a gas into said container under pressure;

means for exhausting gas from said container;

said means for introducing gas into said container comprising:

a monopropellant gas generator;

a fuel supply attached to said container;

first valve means between said fuel supply and said generator for supplying discrete amounts of fuel to said gas generator;

second valve means for exhausting gas from said container;

sensing means producing a first output representative of pressure external of said container;

second sensing means producing a second output representative of the differential between pressure within said container and pressure external of said container;

rate feedback means for producing a third output representative of the velocity of the system; and

means responsive to said first, second and third outputs for controlling said valve means for introducing fuel and for exhausting gas so that the volume of gas present in said container varies as necessary to acquire zero velocity and neutral buoyancy of the system when a predetermined sea pressure is reached.

References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,179,962 4/1965 Shear et a1. 9-8 3,257,672 6/1966 Meyer et a1. 9--8 3,322,088 5/1967 Harada et a1 11454 3,436,776 4/1969 Davis 11416 X TRYGVE M. BLIX, Primary Examiner

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3179962 *Dec 24, 1963Apr 27, 1965Poust Lester NFlotation apparatus and mechanical control therefor
US3257672 *Dec 24, 1963Jun 28, 1966Ingraham Chester SFlotation apparatus and electrical control therefor
US3322088 *Jun 15, 1965May 30, 1967Asahi Chemical IndApparatus for refloating submerged bodies
US3436776 *Feb 23, 1967Apr 8, 1969Texas Instruments IncSelf-ballasting streamer
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3942456 *May 15, 1974Mar 9, 1976Erno RaumfahrttechnikRescue equipment for submarine vehicles
US4183316 *Dec 5, 1977Jan 15, 1980The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The NavyVariable volume depth control
US4286539 *Oct 18, 1979Sep 1, 1981Joseph PignoneDual buoyancy device
US4364325 *Nov 24, 1980Dec 21, 1982The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc.Passive controlled buoyancy apparatus
US4538230 *Oct 29, 1982Aug 27, 1985Conoco Inc.Method and apparatus for controlling altitude
US5303552 *Jul 6, 1992Apr 19, 1994Webb Douglas CCompressed gas buoyancy generator powered by temperature differences in a fluid body
US5379267 *Nov 4, 1993Jan 3, 1995Sparton CorporationBuoyancy control system
US5460556 *Dec 30, 1993Oct 24, 1995Loral CorporationVariable buoyancy buoy
US6321676 *Jan 6, 2000Nov 27, 2001Seamagine Hydrospace CorporationUnderwater craft having sealed and inflatable buoyancy chambers
US6772705Sep 25, 2002Aug 10, 2004Kenneth J. LeonardVariable buoyancy apparatus for controlling the movement of an object in water
WO2011108917A1 *Mar 5, 2010Sep 9, 2011Albert Johan HoutmanSubmersible boat, comprising a diving tank having an inflatable buoyancy body
Classifications
U.S. Classification114/331, 441/29
International ClassificationF42B19/00, B63G8/00, F42B22/00, F42B19/04, F42B22/08, B63G8/22
Cooperative ClassificationF42B22/08, F42B19/04, B63G8/22
European ClassificationB63G8/22, F42B19/04, F42B22/08