Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3532521 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateOct 6, 1970
Filing dateFeb 3, 1969
Priority dateOct 27, 1966
Publication numberUS 3532521 A, US 3532521A, US-A-3532521, US3532521 A, US3532521A
InventorsBakan Joseph A, Emrick Donald D, Haines Robert C Jr
Original AssigneeNcr Co
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Amalgamation mixture containing encapsulated mercury
US 3532521 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

3,532,521 AMALGAMATION MIXTURE CONTAINING ENCAPSULATED MERCURY Joseph A. Bakan, Dayton, Donald D. Emrick, Kettering, and Robert C. Haines, Jr., Dayton, Ohio, assignorsto The National Cash Register Company, Dayton, Ohio, a corporation of Maryland No Drawing. Continuation of application Ser. No. 589,846, Oct. 27, 1966. This application Feb. 3, 1969, Ser. No. 796,203

Int. Cl. A61k /02 US. Cl. 106-35 ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE A premix dental amalgam mixture is disclosed wherein minute, rupturable, capsules containing mercury are mixed with a pre-determined amount of dental alloy such that the mixture, when triturated, forms a hardening mercury-alloy amalgam.

This is a continuation of application for US. Letters Pat. Ser. No. 589,846, filed Oct. 27, 1966.

This invention relates to an improvement in the formation of amalgams and compositions for the formation of amalgams in which mercury is encased in minute rigid rupturable spherical shells of polymeric material to prevent amalgamation with the other components of the complement alloy prior to the time the amalgam is to be used. More specifically, this invention relates to the formation of a premix of a mixture of the correct pro portion of liquid mercury and alloy metal that amalgamates upon the application of stirring or pressure.

An amalgam is a special type of alloy in that one of its constituents is mercury. The amalgam restoration of teeth is possible only because of the unique characteristics of mercury. It is this metal which makes possible the plastic mass which can be inserted and finished in the 2 Claims teeth, and which will then harden to a structure that reing of the filling, or, rather, the condensation of the amalgam.

The proportioning of the mercury and alloy is a critical factor in the success of the restoration of teeth. The amount of alloy and mercury to be used is usually defined as the alloy-mercury ratioi.e., the parts by weight of alloy to be combined with the proper amount of mercury. For example, an alloy-mercury ratio of 5/8 indicates that 5 parts of alloy are to be used with 8 parts of mercury by Weight. The ratio may vary for different alloy compositions, particle size, heat treatment and even condensation technique. The alloy-mercury ratio generally employed is 5/ 8, but with the use of finer grained alloys, the ratios of 5/7 or even 5/ 6 may be prescribed.

A Wide variety of alloy and mercury dispensers. or proportioners, is available in the dental profession. They are of two general types. The most common type is the dispenser which is based on volumetric proportioning; the other type is based on measurement by weight. A consid erable difference in accuracy is found among dispensers. Usually, With volumetric devices, the alloy tends to cling to the walls and corners causing incorrect proportioning.

The object of this invention is to permit the transportation of mercury in a previously proportioned mix or premix with the alloy particles for subsequent formation of an inlay filling for caries in human teeth- 3,532,521 Patented Oct. 6, 1970 the mercury in the premix being in the desired proportion to the other metals that an amalgam is formed upon the exertion of pressure, or trituration, whereby the rupturable, seamless capsule walls surrounding the mercury are ruptured and the mercury released.

This invention at once prevents the amalgamation until it is desired and allows the correct amount of mercury to be included With the alloy by encapsulating the mercury in a seamless pressure rupturable capsule which prevents amalgamation until the pressure of mulling ruptures the capsule and allows the mercury to combine with the alloy.

The present invention provides a method of packaging, storing, and handling mixtures of the accurately measured aliquots of normally liquid mercury and a solid, particulate alloy. Premature amalgamation is not possible because of the interposition of the inert capsule wall between the encapsulated liquid mercury phase and the solid fragments of the capsule wall. The mercury remains in isolation until the capsule is ruptured. In the resulting amalgam, the detritus of the ruptured wall is not incompatible with the other components of the amalgam.

The result of the instant invention is to utilize a single package of preweighed alloy pellets or powders and preweighed capsules containing liquid mercury droplets, obviating the measuring and errors inherent in prior practices. This represents a significant advance in the art over previous systems, wherein elemental mercury and the other mixed components of the amalgam were maintained in separate, isolated, relatively large containers until such time as the amalgam components were needed.

The mercury droplets can be encapsulated by any of the known methods such as that of US. Pat. No. 2,800,457, which issued on July 23, 1957, to B. K. Green et al. The preferred method is illustrated by the following example in which mercury droplets are encapsulated with a rigid,

rupturable, seamless, Wall of a gum arabic-gelatin complex.

EXAMPLE I One hundred eighty milliliters of an 11% solution of a high quality, acid-extracted, pigskin gelatin (285-305 Bloom strength, isoelectric point pH 8-9) and one hundred eighty milliliters of an 11% solution of gum arabic in water were separately prepared. Forty milliliters of a 2% solution of a copolymer of ethylene and maleic anhydride having a molecular weight of 6000 (sold as Monsanto EMA21 by Monsanto Chemical Corp., St. Louis, Mo., USA.) and forty milliliters of a 2% solution of another copolymer of ethylene and maleic anhydride exhibiting a molecular weight ranging from 60,000 to 70,000 (sold as Monsanto EMA-31 by Monsanto Chemical Corp, St. Louis, Mo., USA.) were mixed together.

The foregoing solutions were added, in sequentia, to 1200 milliliters of water in a vessel, the viscosity of which had been adjusted by the addition of 4 grams of gum guar. The pH of the solution was adjusted to approximately 6.5 at 45 degrees centigrade by the addition of a 10 percent solution of sodium hydroxide after the mixture had been slowly cooled.

Approximately five pounds of pure mercury metal was dropped from a dropping funnel into the agitated mixture. The average mercury drop size was approximately to 300 microns. The entire system was allowed to cool to about 25 degrees centigrade while being stirred, then chilled in an ice bath to less than 10 degrees centigrade. To the system was added 10 milliliters of a 25%, by weight, aqueous pentanedial solution. The system was stirred for about sixteen hours, the temperature gradually being increased to an end point of about 25 degrees centigrade, and the extraneous material decanted from the capsules. The capsules were washed with two liters of hexylene glycol during two hours of agitation. The first hexylene glycol was decanted and the capsules were rinsed for one additional hour in an agitated two-liter quantity of hexylene glycol. The second quantity of hexylene gylcol was decanted and a vacuum Buchner funnel was used to remove the traces of hexylene glycol. Toluene was poured over the capsules and removed with vacuum filtration as a further washing step. The capsules were complete at this time.

Other examples of capsule wall materials include gelatin-gum arabic complexes, gelatin-carrageenan complexes, phased-out succinylated gelatins, and ethyl cellulose. The capsules are preferably less than 400 microns in diameter and the thickness of the capsule walls is preferably less than microns thick. It must, of course, be understood as apparent that the spherical capsule diameter must be, in every case, more than twice the capsule wall thickness-such being a simple, inherent, requirement in order for the capsules to contain some material. It is obvious that a capsule cannot exist with a spherical diameter which is less than twice the capsule wall thickness.

As previously noted, the detritus of the ruptured cell walls is negligible with respect to the volume of the other reactants. The fragments do not hinder the amalgamation process in any way, nor is there any deleterious etfect upon the resulting amalgam.

The component granules of the complementary alloy may, or may not, be encased in a rigid, rupturable, seamless wall. The American Dental Association Specification No. 1 requires a 65% minimum of silver, a 6% maximum of copper, a 2% maximum of zinc, and a minimum of tin in an alloy for use in an amalgam alloy.

In a molding test, 22.9 grams of capsules containing approximately 99% mercury internal phase, prepared in the foregoing procedure, exhibiting diameters in the range of 100 to 200 microns were thoroughly mixed under conditions of low shear and no external pressure with 14.3 grams of an alloy meeting the American Dental Association Specification No. 1 (sold as Aristaloy by the Baker Dental Division of Englehard Industries, Inc., East Newark, N.J., U.S.A.). The resulting mixture could be stored indefinitely in unreacted form.

A portion of the mixture was triturated with a moderate application of pressure in a glass mortar with a glass pestle for two to three minutes. The resulting amalgam exhibited a smooth consistency before it was condensed into an 8 millimeter deep 16 millimeter in diameter, cylindrical mold cavity and allowed to harden for 24 hours. The mold was removed to reveal a solid, relatively hard, durable molded specimen exhibiting no indicia of weakness or faults.

As a general practice, once the amalgam is formed, it should not be permitted to stand more than 3 /2 minutes before its condensation into the prepared cavity. Amalgam that is more than 4 minutes old should be discarded and a new mix made.

The condensation is the forcing of the alloy particles as closely together as possible and into all parts of the prepared cavity.

The instant invention is not limited to use in preparing dental amalgams. Other uses are found in the repairing of jewelry, in soldering fine wiring, in micro-circuitry, etc.

One of the chief uses of the invention is that the encapsulated mercury does not exhibit its idiosyncratic movement and other proclivities, thereby facilitating transport and use. The encapsulated mercury is temporarily denatured.

What is claimed is:

1. An improved dental amalgam mixture comprising a comminuted metal amalgam alloy consisting essentially of a minimum of silver, a maximum of 6% copper, a maximum of 2% zinc, and a minimum of 25% tin and a plurality of droplets of mercury, each droplet of mercury being individually encapsulated in a minute, thinwalled, substantially spherical, pressure-rupturable capsule wherein the spherical diameter of the capsule is about 100 microns to about 400 microns, the thickness of the capsule wall is less than 10 microns, the capsule wall material being selected from the group consisting of copolymers of ethylene and maleic anhydride, gelatin, gum arabic, carrageenan, succinylated gelatins, and ethyl cellulose.

2. The dental amalgam mixture of claim 1 wherein the alloy-mercury ratio is from about to about /6, by weight.

References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,774,258 8/ 1930 English 3215 1,963,085 6/1934 Gray 32-15 2,218,755 10/1940 Kaufmann 10635 3,016,134- 1/1962 Borsuk l69 OTHER REFERENCES NCR Capsules Have Wide Possibilities, an article appearing in the October 1959 issue of The NCR Factory News, the National Cash Register Company, Dayton, Ohio.

JULIUS PROME, Primary Examiner J. H. MILLER, Assistant Examiner US. Cl. X.R.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1774258 *Jul 8, 1929Aug 26, 1930Raymond A EnglishDuplex capsule or the like
US1963085 *Aug 5, 1933Jun 19, 1934Arthur W GrayComminuted alloy
US2218755 *Jun 29, 1938Oct 22, 1940Kaufmann Hans PComposition of matter and method of preparation
US3016134 *Jul 1, 1959Jan 9, 1962Harold BorsukDental amalgam package
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3841860 *Jul 11, 1973Oct 15, 1974Dentsply Res & DevDental alloy
US5195663 *Nov 25, 1991Mar 23, 1993Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing CompanyMixing and dispensing assembly for preparations such as dental materials
DE102010014708A1Apr 12, 2010Oct 13, 2011Deutscher Berufs Und Erwerbs Imker Bund E.V.Lichtdichte Verpackung für Lebensmittel
U.S. Classification106/35, 264/4.4, 428/402.2, 106/135.1, 420/527, 524/23, 264/4.3, 428/402.22, 433/226, 106/140.1, 106/144.1, 420/501
International ClassificationA61K6/05, C22C7/00, A61K6/02, B23K35/02
Cooperative ClassificationC22C7/00, B23K35/0244, A61K6/05
European ClassificationA61K6/05, B23K35/02D5, C22C7/00
Legal Events
Jan 16, 1982ASAssignment
Effective date: 19811130