Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3533761 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateOct 13, 1970
Filing dateFeb 27, 1968
Priority dateFeb 27, 1968
Also published asDE1907687A1
Publication numberUS 3533761 A, US 3533761A, US-A-3533761, US3533761 A, US3533761A
InventorsMarvin B Pierson
Original AssigneeMarvin B Pierson, Armco Steel Corp
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Method for finishing metallic coatings on a strand and the article produced
US 3533761 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Oct. 13, 1979' PIERSON 3,533,761


' v ATTORNEYS Patented Oct. 13, 1970 3,533,761 METHOD FOR FINISHING METALLIC COATINGS ON A STRAND AND THE ARTICLE PRODUCED Marvin B. Pierson, Armco Steel Corp., Middletown, Ohio 45042 Filed Feb. 27, 1968, Ser. No. 708,598 Int. Cl. C23c 1/02, 1/04, 1/06 US. Cl. 29--191 11 Claims ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE A method of finishing a molten metallic coating on a cylindrical strand wherein a swirling gas jet is directed at a moving strand carrying still molten coating metal so as to remove excess coating metal and break up pneumatically the oxide skin on the coating metal into small, uniformly distributed particles, and a product produced by this process.

The apparatus used with this invention includes a nozzle having a plurality of slots equally spaced about the strand pass line and directed tangentially toward a strand passing therethrough.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates generally to the coating of a cylindrical strand such as wire or tubing with any of the conventional metallic coatings including aluminum and its alloys, zinc and its alloys, terne, and the like.

The continuous hot dip coating methods according to the prior art have endeavored to produce an oxide free coating. That is, these prior art coating methods have utilized a variety of finishing means such as dies, rolls, wipers, gas jets, and the like which substantially prevent coating metal oxides formed prior to the finishing operation from passing the finishing means and exiting on the product. It should be understood that the molten metal surface will oxidize immediately after the product leaves the finishing means, however, as used in this application, the term oxide free will refer to a coating on which no oxide skin is visible from a normal visual examination.

More specifically, it is recognized in the art that the exposed surface of the bath of molten coating metal develops a noxide or scum layer. This is particularly true in the case of aluminum, wherein the oxide skin is unusually tough and gummy. The efforts of workers in the prior art have been to devise a method wherein the strand could be withdrawn from the bath of molten metal without picking up this oxide layer.

For example, US. Letters Patents 2,914,423 and 3,060,889, both in the name of Earl L. Knapp contemplate a process wherein the wire is withdrawn vertically from the coating metal bath, so that the moving wire will pull up the molten coating metal to a portion of the finishing die. An oxide sock, will extend from the bath to the die, while the substantially pure metal (oxide free) under the oxide layer is withdrawn as a coating on the wire.

A horizontal coating operation utilizing a coating metal container having close tolerance entry seal and exit dies permits passage of the strand through the bath without contacting the oxide layer on the surface of the bath. By restricting the area of the exposed coating metal meniscus, and by directing a non-oxidizing gas with sufficient mass and velocity against the meniscus, an oxide free coating can be successfully produced. However, this technique has not been successfully used to produce heavier coating weights (coating weights in excess of .30 ounce per square foot of surface for zinc).

However, under certain circumstances such as in the coating of copper plated tubing, it is impossible to use close tolerance dies for the coating bath, thereby necessitating a flooding technique as described in co-pending application Ser. No. 616,680, in the name of Kenneth G. Coburn et a1. While this flooding technique eliminates the problem of close tolerance dies, it also means that the molten coating metal is exposed to the atmosphere before finishing is accomplished, and hence the problem of oxide control becomes a factor once again.

As already indicated in connection with vertical coating methods, the prior art has heretofore thought that the only solution would be found in devising a method for removing, eliminating, or restraining this oxide layer.

The instant invention, in its broadest aspect, depends upon exactly the opposite concept. That is, this invention is directed to the production of what might be called an oxide finish coating. An oxide finish coating is produced when the relatively heavy, visible oxide formed on the molten coating metal prior to and during finishing is applied to the strand by the finishing means. As previous-' ly indicated, this type of coating has heretofore been largely undesirable.

Keeping the foregoing comments in mind, it is a primary object of this invention to provide a method and apparatus for finishing a metallic coating so as to produce a heavier coating of uniform coating thickness, both longitudinally and transversely of the strand than previously possible.

It is a further object of this invention to provide a method and apparatus for producing a smooth, oxide finish metallic coating on a cylindrical strand.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In its broadest concept, this invention contemplates that a moving strand is passed through a bath of molten coating metal. Some distance from the coatingbath, a swirling gaseous jet is positioned which, by virtue of its twisting action, causes the surface oxide to be broken into very small uniformly distributed particles.

The swirling gas jet also is utilized to create a dam or air knife effect to control the quantity of molten coating metal adhering to the strand, and hence controlling coating weight.

The apparatus used with this invention includes a jet nozzle having a plurality of slots radially spaced about the opening, and directed tangentially toward the strand passing through the nozzle.

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a schematic view showing a portion of a metallic coating line utilizing the method and apparatus of this invention.

FIG. 2 is a cross sectional view showing the nozzle of this invention.

FIG. 3 is an end elevational view of one of the components of FIG. 2 showing the tangential slot pattern.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT In general, the hot dip coating of wire, tubing, and the like includes the steps of thoroughly cleaning or otherwise preparing the surface of the base metal for the reception of the molten coating. These preparatory steps do not per se form a part of this invention, and it is to be understood that this invention contemplates such a pretreatment prior'tothe time the wire arrives at the molten coating bath.

Exemplary preparatory procedures now in commercial use are described in detail in Sendzimir Pats. 2,110,893

2,136,957, and 2,197,662, and in the co-pending application 616,680 referred to earlier. In general, these references contemplate that the strand is cleaned of oils,

greases and the like by passage through an oxidizing furnace wherein carbonaceous material is burned from the surface, and a very thin controlled oxide coating is formed thereon. The strand is then subjected to a heat treatment in a reducing atmosphere wherein the previously formed oxide layer is removed. Finally, without reexposing the wire to atmosphere, it is passed directly into a bath of molten coating metal.

Instead of the described treatment in an oxidizing furnace, alkali or other chemical cleaning involving wetting and drying of the strip surface, or even abrasive treatment may be used, so long as the surface of the wire is sufiiciently cleaned that an extremely rapid and thorough wetting by the molten metal itself takes place in the coating bath.

Turning now to FIG. 1, the strand being coated is indicated at 10. As previously indicated, it is to be assumed that the surface of the strand has been thoroughly cleaned by an appropriate pre-coating treatment. The tube 12 extends between the reducing furnace and the coating bath, so as to provide a suitable protective atmosphere for the strand prior to immersion in the coating bath.

The coating bath is schematically indicated at 14. As is well known in the art, this coating bath will be pro vided with entrance and exit dies aligned so as to define a path of travel for the strand being coated. (While the illustrated examples show a horizontal path of travel, the invention is equally applicable to a vertical coating operation.) According to this invention, the entrance die should provide relatively close clearance for the strand being coated in order to prevent excessive leakage of the coating metal.

By comparison, the exit die indicated at 16 in FIG. 1 should provide considerable clearance for the passing strand in order to insure that an excess of coating metal is carried out by the moving strand. This excess of coating material carried by the strand is schematically shown at 18.

The excess of coating metal may be applied in various ways besides exiting from a loose tolerance die. For example, the molten coating metal may be poured onto the passing strand as taught in co-pending application 616,- 680 noted earlier, or it may be flooded onto the strand by passing the strand through a trough containing molten coating metal.

The apparatus used with this invention comprises a jet nozzle indicated generally at 20 located a substantial distance away from the exit die 16.

The jet nozzle is shown in more detail in FIGS. 2 and 3. It comprises a female element 22 having a cylindrical bore 24 terminating in the conical wall 26. As seen in FIG. 2, the right hand portion of the bore 24 is threaded as at 24a. The element 22 is also provided with an aperture 28 through which the strand being coated passes.

The male element of the jet nozzle is indicated generally at 30, and includes the threaded portion 32 which will mate with the threads 24a of the female element. The element is also provided with a portion 34 of reduced diameter, which terminates in the conical surface 36. It will be apparent that the angle of the conical surface 36 on the end of the male element 30 is identical to the angle of the conical surface 26 at the end of the bore in the female element 20. It will also be seen that the male element is provided with a central aperture 38 of the same size as the aperture 28 in the female element, and through which the strand being coated passes.

Referring now to FIG. 3, it will be observed that the conical surface 36 of the male element is provided with a plurality of slots 40. These slots are arranged so that their axes are substantially tangent to the external surface of the tube being coated.

In operation of this nozzle, the male element 30 is threadedly received into the female element 20. This arrangement permits the provision of an adjustable annular slot opening 42. The area between the bore 24 of the female element and the portion 34 of reduced diameter of the male element, in effect provides a plenum chamber which will be supplied with a suitable wiping gas through the tube 44. By virtue of the angular positioning of the slots 40, the nozzle of this invention provides a spiraling or twisting jet action upon the excess coating metal carried by the strand 10.

While applicant does not intend to be bound by theory, it is believed that this spiraling, twisting jet action on the molten coating metal is two fold. First of all, it is believed that the jet creates a dam effect or air knife action which will prevent excess molten coating metal from passing through the nozzle. This action is similar in effect to a conventional jet or air knife wiper.

The second feature or effect of this twisting jet is believed to represent a substantial departure from the practice of the prior art. That is, as indicated at the outset of this specification, the excess molten metal on the strand rapidly develops an oxide skin, referred to in the art as an oxide sock. With a conventional concentric jet nozzle, using high enough pressures and placed close enough to the exit die of the coating bath, it is possible to restrain this oxide sock along with most of the excess molten coating metal applied to the strand, resulting in a relatively light, oxide free metallic coating. As efforts are made to produce a heavier coating, the conventional jet permits an intermittent breaking of the oxide sock, causing an unsightly finish and non-uniform coating. Usually, when an oxide ringlet or segment breaks off, the coating thickness immediately following the ringlet is significantly less than normal. There is also a periodic tendency for the whole oxide sock between the coating bath and the nozzle to build up, break off, and pass totally through the nozzle on the tube. It is believed that the swirling gas jet of this invention eliminates these shortcomings by providing a turbulent twisting action which causes the oxide sock to break up continuously into very small segments or particles which remain on the coating. Thus, the instant invention represents the first successful application of an oxide finish coating. The oxide formed ahead of the finishing means is intentionally and continuously applied to the product in a controlled manner.

It has also been found that the method of this invention is capable of producing far heavier coatings on a horizontal pass without appreciable sag of coating metal with respect to the strand. This excellent transverse uniformity of coating is believed to be achieved in part by the redistribution of coating metal caused by the swirling, twisting action of the jet, in part by the chilling action of the jet, and in par-t the oxide skin finish which tends to support the molten metal film until solidification is completed in a subsequent water quench.

In an exemplary operation utilizing the nozzle of this invention in connection with the coating of a inch outside diameter tubing, the preferred design for the nozzle is as follows: the diameter of the apertures 28 and 38 should be &5 inch; the angle of the conical surfaces 26 and 36 to the tube 10 being coated should be eight slots 40 were provided in the conical surface 36, each of the slots being inch wide and inch deep, and tangent to a inch diameter circle centered in the bore. (The direction of the swirling action is unimpor tant.)

As indicated earlier, the threaded engagement between the female and male elements 20 and 30 respectively provides an adjustableannular slot opening 42. It has been found that this annular opening is useful to minimize splatter of the coating metal at low speeds. However, at speeds on the order of 50 feet per minute and faster, better operation is obtained when the annular opening is sealed off by threading the male element 30 into the female element until it is fully seated.

Preheated air, super-heated steam, or other oxidizing gases are preferred as the wiping agent since the oxide produced on the coating is beneficial in resisting the sagging of the coating. Other gases such as nitrogen and argon can be used.

The plenum pressure can be varied between /2 and 3 p.s.i., and is the basic control for coating Weight on the unit. -It has been found that this method and apparatus, operating horizontally and using the pressure range set up above can successfully produce coating weights from about to about .60 ounce per square foot of strand surface without observable coating metal sa'g.

Returning now briefly to FIG. 1, the action of the jet nozzle on the excess coating has been schematically illustrated. The excess coating metal will be run off the strand into a reservoir 46. This material is then conveyed by means of the pump 48 back to the coating bath 14.

It is believed that the foregoing description constitutes a full explanation of the invention. While the invention has been described in terms of an exemplary embodiment, no limitations are to be inferred or implied except as specifically set forth in the claims which follow.

The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:

1. In a continuous metallic coating method wherein the surface of a strand to be coated is thoroughly cleaned and thereafter the strand is passed through a bath of molten coating metal, the improved method of finishing said molten metal adhering to said strand comprising the steps of: v

(a) permitting an oxide layer to form on the molten coating adhering to said strand;

.(b) pneumaitcally breaking up said oxide layer into small, uniformly distributed particles; and

(c) solidifying said coating.

2. In a continuous metallic coating method wherein the surface of a strand to be coated is thoroughly cleaned and the strand passed through a bath of molten coating metal the improved method of finishing said molten coating adhering to the stand comprising the steps of:

(a) permitting an oxide layer to form on said molten coating adhering to said strand;

'(b) directing a swirling gas jet at said oxide covered molten coating; and

(c) solidifying said coating.

3. In a continuous metallic coating method wherein the surface of a strand is thoroughly cleaned, the improved method comprising the steps of:

(a) supplying molten coating metal to said strand;

(b) directing a swirling gas jet at said molten coating adhering to said strand; and

(c) thereafter solidifying said coating.

4. The method claimed in claim 3 wherein said jet utilizes an oxidizing gas.

5. The method claimed in claim 4 wherein said gaseous jet utilizes air.

6. In a continuous metallic coating method wherein the surface of a strand to be coated is thoroughly cleaned, the improved method comprising the steps of:

(a) supplying molten coating metal to said strand;

(b) forming an oxide layer on said coating metal applied to said strand;

(c) breaking up said oxide layer into small, uniformly distributed particles; and

(d) solidifying said coating with particles thereon.

7. A method for producing heavy metallic coatings comprising the steps of (a) cleaning the surface of a strand to be coated;

(b) passing said strand through a restricted opening into a bath of molten coating metal;

(c) withdrawing said strand from said bath through a non-restricted opening, whereby said strand will carry an excess of molten coating metal thereon;

(d) permitting an oxide layer to form on said coating adhering to said strand; and

(e) finishing said coating by breaking up of said oxide layer into small, uniformly distributed parts and subsequently solidifying said coating without the removal of said oxide layer.

8. A metallic coated object comprising:

(a) a cylindrical base metal strand; and

(b) a concentric, metallic coating adhering to said strand produced by applying a molten metallic coating to said strand, directing a swirling gas jet at the molten coating metal adhering to said strand and then solidifying said coating.

9. The method claimed in claim 7 wherein said step of finishing said coating includes the steps of directing a swirling gas jet at said oxide covered molten coating and thereafter solidifying said coating.

10. The object claimed in claim 8 wherein said metallic coating comprises zinc.

11. The object claimed in claim 8 wherein said metallic coating comprises aluminum.

References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 811,854 2/1906 Lee 1l7102 1,907,034 5/1933 Austin 117102 2,080,518 5/1937 Underwood 11863 X 2,084,150 6/1937 Lawrence 1l'863 2,110,893 3/ 1938 Sendzimir.

2,135,652 11/1938 Whitfield et al. 117l14 2,304,069 12/ 1942 Beckwith 1175 1 2,526,731 10/1950 Coburn 11868 X 2,914,423 11/ 1959 Knapp 117-102 3,060,889 10/ 1962 Knapp L 118-63 3,226,817 1/ 1966 Simborg et al. l18'63 ALFRED L. L-EAVITT, Primary Examiner T. E. BOKAN, Assistant Examiner US. Cl. X.R.

29-l94, 197; 1l75l, 62, 102, 114, 1l863

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US811854 *Aug 18, 1903Feb 6, 1906John LeeProcess of tinning or coating metal sheets with tin or other metallic coatings.
US1907034 *Feb 15, 1929May 2, 1933Ohio Brass CoProcess and apparatus for treating coated articles
US2080518 *Jun 1, 1933May 18, 1937Western Electric CoMethod of and apparatus for coating strands
US2084150 *Sep 8, 1934Jun 15, 1937Western Electric CoApparatus for coating material
US2110893 *Jul 16, 1935Mar 15, 1938American Rolling Mill CoProcess for coating metallic objects with layers of other metals
US2135652 *May 26, 1937Nov 8, 1938Reynolds Metals CoProcess for metal coating
US2304069 *Dec 14, 1938Dec 8, 1942American Steel & Wire CoMetal coating process
US2526731 *Feb 13, 1945Oct 24, 1950Armco Steel CorpMethod of and apparatus for coating metallic strands with a metal coating
US2914423 *Sep 26, 1956Nov 24, 1959Armco Steel CorpMethod and apparatus for metallic coating of metallic strands
US3060889 *Sep 26, 1960Oct 30, 1962Armco Steel CorpCoating control device
US3226817 *Apr 17, 1963Jan 4, 1966Internat Nikoh CorpContinuous method for fabricating tubing
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3620805 *Mar 17, 1969Nov 16, 1971Martin CarlMethod for the continuous hot galvanizing of continuously formed elements
US3811406 *Nov 29, 1971May 21, 1974Connollys Blackley LtdApparatus for impregnating and coating stranded bodies
US3832973 *Sep 25, 1973Sep 3, 1974Kalle AgApparatus for the production of a multi-layer sheet material of microporous structure
US3845540 *Apr 28, 1972Nov 5, 1974Maneely IllinoisHot galvanizing process and apparatus
US3877975 *Apr 12, 1973Apr 15, 1975Raymond Anthony JohnMetallic coating of metal tubes and similar work pieces
US3886894 *Dec 14, 1972Jun 3, 1975M & B Metal Products CompanyApparatus for cleaning and coating wire
US3956537 *Apr 22, 1974May 11, 1976Anthony John RaymondGalvanizing
US3976815 *Apr 30, 1975Aug 24, 1976M & B Metal Products CompanyMethod for cleaning and coating rod
US4281617 *Dec 19, 1979Aug 4, 1981Western Electric Company, Inc.Apparatus for coating conductors
US4339480 *Mar 31, 1981Jul 13, 1982Bethlehem Steel CorporationCoating wires
US4414917 *Jan 3, 1983Nov 15, 1983Industrial Cleaning And Coating, Inc.System for selectively treating cables and the like
US5017407 *Aug 10, 1989May 21, 1991Australian Wire Industries Pty. .LimitedStabilisation of jet wiped wire
US5066519 *Aug 10, 1989Nov 19, 1991Australian Wire Industries Pty. LimitedControlling The Film Applied From The Dip Coating Of A Metal Filament
US5164229 *Jul 8, 1991Nov 17, 1992The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air ForceCeramic precursor
US5217533 *Jul 8, 1991Jun 8, 1993The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air ForceCoating apparatus for continuous fibers
US5492721 *Jun 8, 1993Feb 20, 1996Mag Maschinen Und Apparatebau Gesellschaft MbhPumping molten resin from supply into coating means, pulling wire through resin coating means with molten resin, returning excess resin to supply, controlling temperature, circulating resin, calibrating coating thickness, heardening resin coating
US5527563 *Dec 28, 1994Jun 18, 1996Allied Tube & Conduit CorporationFlow coat galvanizing
US8216033 *Aug 25, 2008Jul 10, 2012Process Air Solutions, LlcLow pressure blow-off assemblies and related methods
U.S. Classification428/629, 427/270, 427/329, 428/658, 427/349, 428/469, 428/632, 427/273, 427/431, 427/434.7, 427/434.6, 428/650, 427/436, 118/63, 428/640, 118/405, 428/939, 427/399, 427/259, 428/687, 427/433, 427/287
International ClassificationC23C2/26, C23C2/38
Cooperative ClassificationC23C2/26, Y10S428/939
European ClassificationC23C2/26
Legal Events
Feb 27, 1989ASAssignment
Effective date: 19881014
Feb 27, 1989AS06Security interest
Effective date: 19881014
Apr 25, 1988ASAssignment
Effective date: 19880314