|Publication number||US3547115 A|
|Publication date||Dec 15, 1970|
|Filing date||Apr 5, 1968|
|Priority date||Apr 5, 1968|
|Publication number||US 3547115 A, US 3547115A, US-A-3547115, US3547115 A, US3547115A|
|Inventors||Peter S Stevens|
|Original Assignee||Peter S Stevens|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Referenced by (40), Classifications (28)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
United States Patent Peter S. Stevens 116 30th St.. Mahattan Beach, Calif.
 lnventor  Patented Dec. 15,1970
 OSTEOARTICULAR PROSTHETIC METHOD 10 Claims, 13 Drawing Figs.
OTHER REFERENCES Downs ORTHOPAEDIC INSTRUMENT NEWS No. 4,
Nov. 1965, Published by Down Bros. and Mayer & Phelps LTD. Surrey. England pages l3, l4 copy in Group 335 Primary ExaminerRichard A. Gaudet Assistant Examiner-J. Yasko Attorney-Robert C. Comstock ABSTRACT: An osteoarticular prosthesis and prosthetic method which is particularly adapted for use on the distal humerus. The prosthesis has an outer articular surface corresponding to the articular surface being replaced. The bone upon which the prosthesis is to be mounted is preferably first trimmed to fit a keyhole-type opening in the prosthesis. The prosthesis has a sharpened leading edge and is transversely driven onto the bone. Once in place, the prosthesis is locked against displacement by its keyhole-type interengagement with the bone. The prosthesis may be manufactured in quantity in a limited number of standard sizes instead of being custom made.
PATENTED 05m SIQYG 3547.115
SHEET 2 BF 2 FIG. 10.
INVEHTOR PETER 5. STEVENS P0552? C CoA/i srocK A TTOE'NE Y OSTEOARTICULAR PROSTHETIC METHOD BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The invention relates to an osteoarticular prosthesis and prosthetic method which is particularly applicable for use in replacing a defective distal humeral or similar articular surcumbersome, too difficult to emplace, and/or too expensive to have met with wide use or notable success. Such has been the case with prior distal humeral prostheses.
Previous prosthetic devices designed to replace a defective distal humeral joint surface have consisted of a metal or plastic replica of the distal humerus which is attached to an intramedullary nail, with or without side plates. The prosthesis is affixed to a resected humerus by means of an intramedullary nail, and by screws through the side plates, if such are provided on the prosthesis. Such prostheses are not available on a mass-production basis, but are custom made by the prosthetics manufacturer from X-rays and measurements of each particular patient. Hence, they are very expensive.
The use of the above-mentioned prosthesishas been very limited because of several disadvantages: (l) The operation is an extensive one, requiring a wide exposure and necessitating the destruction of most of the joint capsule and the removal of the origins of a variable number of the forearm muscles. (2) The prosthesis tends to become unstable, because the intramedullary nail may rotate. (3) A considerable amount of bone is lost, since the distal humerus is replaced by prosthesis; and, if the prosthesis must later be removed, arthrodesis of the joint without marked shortening will be very difficult, if not impossible. (4) The prosthesis is complex in shape, difficult to manufacture, and hence is available only on a custom-made basis, and is necessarily expensive.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The invention relates to an osteoarticular prosthesis and method which are particularly adapted for use on the distal humerus and which overcome the problems of the previous devices and methods described above and in which the prosthesis meets all of the following requirements: l It must be chemically inert. (2) It must be easy to manufacture. (3) It must be so designed that several sizes will accommodate all distal humeral joints, to permit manufacture on a massproduction basis. (4) It must restore normal mechanics of the elbow joint. (In other words, both the hinge motion of the ulna and the hinge and rotational motion of the radius must be preserved). (5) It must be completely stable on the humerus. (6) It must spare bone, in case a later arthrodesis is required. (7) It must be easy to emplace. (8) It must be simple, and not require multiple screws, etc. to hold it in place. (9) It must be durable.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a prosthesis and prosthetic method in which the prosthesis comprises a member which is adapted to be driven transversely onto the partially trimmed articular surface of the bone. The prosthesis itself may further trim the bone as it is driven into place, to provide a perfect fit. The prosthesis provides an articular sur face which replaces the articular surface of the joint, with the removal of a minimum amount of bone. In the case of the distal humerus, there is no cutting of muscle attachments and generally only the ulnar collateral ligament and medial capsule are incised.
It is particularly an object of the invention to provide a prosthesis which is held in place on the bone by a keyhole or similar interlocking engagement with the bone upon which it is mounted. Once in place, the prosthesis is completely stable and no pins or screws are required to maintain it in position.
Another object of the invention is to 'provide a prosthesis and prosthetic method particularly for the distal humerus in which a single shape of prosthesis in a limited number of standard sizes is provides an adequate fit for substantially all adults. The prosthesis is thus adapted to be manufactured in quantity, rather than being custom made. A comparisonof an X-ray of the particular elbow with a template determines the proper size of prosthesis to be used. This prosthesis and method are accordingly far more economical than those requiring custom-made prostheses.
It is accordingly among the objects of the invention to provide a prosthesis and method having all of the advantages and benefits set forth above and described hereinafter in this specification. The invention also comprises such other ob jects, advantages and capabilities as will later more fully appear and which are inherently possessed by the invention.
While there have been shown in the accompanying drawings Another object of the invention is to provide a prosthesis and prosthetic method particularly for the distal humerus in which a single shape of prosthesis in a limited number of standard sizes provides an adequate fit for substantially all adults. The prosthesis is thus adapted to be manufactured in quantity, rather than being custom made. A comparison of an X-ray of the particular elbow with a template determines the proper size of prosthesis to be used. This prosthesis and method are accordingly far more economical than those requiring custom made prostheses.
It is accordingly among the objects of the invention to provide a prosthesis and method having all. of the advantages and benefits set forth above and described hereinafter in this specification The invention also comprises such other objects, advantages and capabilities as will later more fully appear and which are inherently possessed by the invention.
While there have been shown in the accompanying drawings preferred embodiments of the invention, the same are susceptible of modification and change without departing from the spirit of the invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a top plan view of a distal humeral prosthesis, with one end thereof partially broken away and shown in section to indicate the chisel-joint edge;
FIG. 2 is a sectional view of the same taken along line 2-2 of FIG. I;
FIG. 3 is an end view of the medial end ofthe prosthesis;
FIG. 4 is a side elevational view of the driver;
FIG. 5 is a side elevational view of a damaged distal humerus before trimming;
FIG. 6 is a similar view of the same after trimming in preparation for mounting the prosthesis;
FIG. 7 is a sectional view of the same taken along line 7-7 of FIG. 6, with the trimmed portion indicated in phantom lines;
FIG. 8 is a side elevational view, showing the prosthesis being mounted on the humerus;
FIG. 9 is a side elevational view, showing the prosthesis in place on the humerus;
FIG. 10 is a plan view of a size template;
FIG. 11 is a plan view of the size template in use with an X- ray superimposed thereon;
FIG. 12 is a diagrammetical view of the prosthesis showing the dimensions used in determining the various sizes;
FIG. 13 is an end view similar to FIG. 3 of an alternative embodiment of the invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT A preferred embodiment which has been selected to illustrate the invention comprises an elongated generally cylindrical distal humeral .prosthesis 10, which can be formed 'of titanium, stainless steel or othersuitable material. The prosthesis has a curved outer or articular surface 11 which correspondsto the capitellar andtrochlear portions of the elbowjoint.
The center of the prosthesis 10 is drilled out to form a cen tral cylindrical opening 12, forming an inner open areawhich extends substantially along the' longitudinal axis of the prosthesis 10.for its entire length. slot 13 having a width somewhatless thanthe width and diameter of the opening 12, intersects the opening 12 and extends from the opening 12 to the outer surface of the prosthesis 10.-The cylindrical opening "12 and slot 13 combine to formakeyhole shaped opening which extends along the entire length of the prosthesis 1Q,
The capitellar end 14 of the prosthesis 10 is somewhat rounded in configuration, but is preferably sharpened to pro 'v'ide a chisellike pointed edge 14a on the end of the prosthesis which is driven onto the bone. The outer articular surface of the prosthesis 10 is preferably polished to a: mirror gloss or made as smooth as possible, so as to minimize friction. On the contrary, the inside surfaces of the opening-Hand slot 13 are preferably left unpolished to present somewhat rough surfaces which will increase the frictional engagement between these surfaces and the bone surfaces which they engage. The medial end 15 of the prosthesis 10 is preferably flat and is preferably polished or smooth.
f The inside of the prosthesis 10 is provided with a concentric groove or keyway 16, which extends along the lower or inner portion of the slot 13 and along the adjacent portion of the jcylindrical opening 12. The keyway 16' is disposed a short distance inwardly from the medial end 15 of the prosthesis 10.
' An elongated driver 17 is adapted to be used'to mount the prosthesis l0 onthe humerus. The driver 17 has an elongated preferably knurled handle portion 18 which is adapted to be manually grasped'by the surgeon. The driver 17 has an inner end portion 19 of reduced diameter. The junction between the handle 18 and inner end portion 19 comprises a transverselydirected shoulder 20 which is adapted to fit against and engage the medial end 15 of the prosthesis l0-when the driver 17 is-in use.
The inner end portion-19 of the driver 17 is provided with a radially directed pin 21 which protrudes outwardly. The pin 2 1 has a pair of substantially parallel sidewalls which are dimensioned to fit within and engage the sidewalls of the ikeyway 16 in the prosthesis 10.
The driver 17 is engaged with the prosthesis 10 by inserting The operative technique for installingthe prosthesis is as follows:
An incision is made over the medial humeral epicondyle ind the ulna nerve is identified and retracted proximally. The ulnar collateral ligament is incised and the joint is thereby ex- Iposed. It is sometimes necessary to incise the lateral aspect of the joint as well as the media]. The joint is partially dislocated traction onthe forearm, so that both trochlea and capitelliim may be visualized. The artieular surface of the distal humerus'lis then chiseled away, using an osteotome, until the eross section of the distal humerus approximates that of the in- 'terior cross section of the prosthesis 10, as shown in FIGS. 6 and 7 of the drawings.
The prosthesis, with the driver, 17 attached, is then positioned medially to the reshaped distal humerus and gently hammered on in a-lateral direction, as shown in FIG. 8 of the; drawings. vThe sharpened capitellar side of .the prosthesis acts like an }o'steotome, soi'thatthe prosthesis as his driven on trims the bone to provide for a perfect fit. When the prosthesis 10 reaches the point where the inner end of the driver 17 engages or closely approaches the adjacent end of the humerus, the driver 17 is removed and the prosthesis l0 driven the remaining distance by hammering on the flat medial end 15 of the prosthesis 10.
The ulnar collateral ligament is then reattached to the medial humeral epicondyle, the ulna nerve is released, and soft tissue closure is performed in the usual manner.
When the prosthesis'is in place, as shown in FIG. 9 of the drawings, it is immovable and no pins or screws are required to maintain its position. It cannot move distally because the bone is thicker in thelcentral opening12 than in the slot 13, and it cannot move laterally or medially because the roughly machined surfaces of the central opening 12 and slot 13 provide sufficient gripping engagement with the bone.
It will be noted that the distal humeral joint surface has thus been replaced by a relatively lightweight stainless steel, titanium or other articular surface. The new articular surface is held in place by interengagement between the prosthesis and the bone. Little bone has been removed, no muscle attachments have been cut, and generally only the ulnar collateralligament and medial capsule have been incised.
The prosthesis is preferably made in seven standard sizes, which will fit substantially all adults. All of the seven sizes haveexactly the same shape-theyare only larger or smaller.
trochlea. In other words, the present invention provides a universal distal humeral joint shape. Prostheses made to this one shape, of the appropriate size, will fit all joints well enough for adequate function. r
The formula forthis universal shape isi Capitellar diameter (D,) =0.55
Trochlear diameter (DJ =0.55
Intracondylar ridge diameter (D =O.48 Minimum diameter (D 0.35
Lateral capitellum to intracondylar (L =0.55 Lateral capitellum to minimum diameter (L FIG. 12 of the drawings shows the relationship between the above formula and the prosthesis 10.
This formula is forxthe articular surface, not for the bony distal humerus as seenonX-ray. For any given width, the articular surface, and. thus theprosthesis, will be of slightly greater diameter than the bone "because the prosthesis must replace the cartilage on the humeral articular surface, which is approximately one-sixteenth ofan inch thick? As for the shape of-t'he curved articular surfaces themselves, the capitellum is essentially a sphere, so that its cross section; in any plane is acircle..The shape of the intracondylarridge;
and of the curved surface between it and the trochlea are empirical and were developed to represent curvatures whichwould be compatible with substantially all elbows.
lt'is believed that seyensta ndard sizes of prosthesis, varying, in width in A: inch steps between the limits of 1% inch to inch is the optimum number of sizes required for an adequate;-
fit for substantially alladult elbows. For convenience in sel ing the proper sizepf prosthesis, a vp hototernplate 3.0ma provided which isshown in FIG. 1 the drawings.
"slall of the sizes. The photo ten plat e lio i To determine the proper size to use, the orthopedic surgeon need only take a good antero-posterior X-ray of the elbow in question or the contralateral elbow of the same individual. The X-ray and phototemplate 30 are then superimposed and a comparison made to determine which size of prosthesis most closely approximates the X-ray. in using the phototemplate 30, the surgeon should place the template curve midway between the humerus and the ulnar and radial bony surfaces on the X-ray. The template will then fall directly over the actual articular surface where the articular cartilages meet (see FIG. 11 of the drawings).
It may be noted that if the prosthesis is not properly positioned when it is first mounted on the-humerus, the engagement between the driver 17 and the prosthesis 10 which is provided by the pin 21 and keyway 16 provides a positive means for withdrawing the prosthesis 10 from the humerus so that it may be repositioned.
Once the prosthesis is in proper position, its keyhole type engagement with the bone prevents its displacement. The
muscles and tendons in the surrounding area may also act to hold it against displacement.
FIG. 13 of the drawings shows another embodiment of prosthesis 40 in which a slot 41 is provided in the upper of the prosthesis, such slot 41 being of dovetail configuration in cross section. This type of prosthesis is particularly useful where a greater proportion of the humerus has been damaged or destroyed or must be removed to install the prosthesis.
It will be noted that all embodiments of the prosthesis are installed laterally 'or transversely across the end of the humerus and that the prosthesis is provided with a dovetail or type of engagement with the humerus which acts to prevent longitudinal displacement of the prosthesis. In the case of the distal humerus, the prosthesis may be' driven on laterally or medially. In the case of other joints, the same or other transverse installation may be used.
In any embodiment of the invention, the prosthesis may, if desired, be provided with one or more holes for the purpose of removing material and thereby reducingthe weight of the prosthesis.
in addition to being used as a distal humeral prosthesis, the present invention is capable of other -erldoprosthetic applica tions such as in the knee joint, ankle joint, etc. In such applications, the shape of the prosthesis is modified in an obvious manner as required for the particular bone upon which the prosthesis is mounted and its outer articular surface is modified to that of the articular surface which it replaces.
1. A method of installing an osteoarticular prosthesis on the damaged end of a bone, said prosthesis being substantially cylindrical and having a longitudinal slot therein and an outer articular surface similar to the original articular surface of said damaged end of said bone, said method comprising shaping said damaged end of said bone to form a lateral cutaway portion shaped to accept said slot, mounting said prosthesis on said damaged end of said bone by positioning said prosthesis adjacent to one side of said damaged end of said bone with said slot aligned with said cutaway portion and then moving said prosthesis in a transversedirection across said damaged end of said bone from one side of said end of said bone to the other until said articular surface of said prosthesis assumes the position of the articular surface of said end of said bone, and securing said prosthesis against movement with respect to said end of said bone.
2. The method described in claim I, and securing. said prosthesis fixed in said position on said end of said bone'at the same time and by the same means by which said prosthesis is mounted on said bone.
3. The method described in claim 2, said prosthesis having a keyhole-type opening therein to receive and hold the reshaped bone by interlocking engagement.
4. The method described in claim 3, said keyhole-type opening having an open end at one end of said prosthesis, and driving said end of said prosthesis onto said bone so that said bone enters said openin through said open end.
5. The method descri ed in claim 4, said open end of said prosthesis having a cutting edge, and trimming said bone with said edge as said prosthesis is mounted on said bone.
6. The method described in claim 4, said prosthesis having an internal keyway intersecting said opening and mounting said prosthesis on said bone with a driver having means adapted to engage said keyway. I
7. The method described in claim 6, and driving said prosthesis laterally onto the distal humerus.
8. The method described in claim 3, and driving said prosthesis laterally onto the distal humerus.
9. The method described in claim 1, and providing a limited number of standard sizes of said prosthesis, all of which have articular surfaces of substantially similar configuration except for differences in size, one of said standard sizes being usable for substantially any adult.
10. The method described in claim 9, and determining the particular standard size of prosthesis to be used by 'a visual comparison of an X-ray of the contour of th the articular surface being replaced with a transparent phototemplate showing the articular surface of said standard sizes of said prostheses.
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3806961 *||Feb 15, 1973||Apr 30, 1974||Sulzer Ag||Phosthetic patella implant|
|US3896502 *||Jan 7, 1974||Jul 29, 1975||Nat Res Dev||Endoprosthetic bone joint devices|
|US3896503 *||Feb 6, 1974||Jul 29, 1975||Nat Res Dev||Endosphosthetic ankle joint devices|
|US3919725 *||Nov 30, 1973||Nov 18, 1975||Nat Res Dev||Endoprosthetic elbow joint devices|
|US3979779 *||May 21, 1975||Sep 14, 1976||Rosenthal Technik Ag||Ceramic implant|
|US4079469 *||Dec 9, 1976||Mar 21, 1978||Thomas Gordon Wadsworth||Elbow joint endoprosthesis|
|US4242758 *||May 30, 1978||Jan 6, 1981||University Of Leeds Industrial Service Ltd.||Elbow prosthesis|
|US4293963 *||Feb 14, 1980||Oct 13, 1981||Zimmer Usa, Inc.||Unrestrained elbow prosthesis|
|US4378607 *||Nov 26, 1980||Apr 5, 1983||Wadsworth Thomas G||Elbow replacement prosthesis|
|US4718414 *||Aug 7, 1986||Jan 12, 1988||Queen's University At Kingston||Instrument for elbow surface replacement arthroplasty|
|US5549673 *||Sep 8, 1993||Aug 27, 1996||Smith & Nephew Richards Inc.||Phonosurgery implant instruments and a system and method of implantation|
|US6241775||May 25, 1999||Jun 5, 2001||Chas. A. Blatchford & Sons Ltd.||Specification of an artificial limb|
|US7588603 *||Nov 5, 2004||Sep 15, 2009||Teknimed||Implantable orthesis and surgical kit for knee arthrodesis|
|US7749278 *||Jul 6, 2010||Smith & Nephew, Inc.||Method of implanting using a set of femoral prostheses|
|US8480756||May 24, 2010||Jul 9, 2013||Smith & Nephew, Inc.||Femoral hip stem implants|
|US8585768||Mar 17, 2006||Nov 19, 2013||Biomet Manufacturing, Llc||Elbow prosthesis|
|US8932362||May 14, 2010||Jan 13, 2015||Biomet Manufacturing, Llc||Elbow prosthesis|
|US8998995||May 7, 2012||Apr 7, 2015||Biomet Manufacturing, Llc||Elbow prosthesis|
|US9034050||Mar 18, 2011||May 19, 2015||Biomet Manufacturing, Llc||Elbow prosthesis|
|US9039779||Mar 13, 2013||May 26, 2015||Biomet Manufacturing, Llc||Adjustable lateral articulating condyle|
|US9114015 *||Aug 7, 2014||Aug 25, 2015||Linares Medical Devices, Llc||Implantable elbow joint assembly with spherical inter-support|
|US9289304||Oct 5, 2013||Mar 22, 2016||Robert A. Kaufmann||Prosthesis for partial and total joint replacement|
|US20050102031 *||Nov 5, 2004||May 12, 2005||Alain Leonard||Implantable orthesis and surgical kit for knee arthrodesis|
|US20060173546 *||Mar 17, 2006||Aug 3, 2006||Biomet Manufacturing Corp.||Elbow prosthesis|
|US20070112433 *||May 2, 2006||May 17, 2007||Philip Frederick||Orthopaedic implants and methods for making the same|
|US20100087928 *||Sep 18, 2009||Apr 8, 2010||Graham Thomas J||Elbow Prosthesis|
|US20100179661 *||Jul 15, 2010||Biomet Manufacturing Corp.||Elbow prosthesis|
|US20100222887 *||May 14, 2010||Sep 2, 2010||Biomet Manufacturing Corp.||Elbow Prosthesis|
|US20100228356 *||May 24, 2010||Sep 9, 2010||Phillip Frederick||Orthopaedic implants and methods for making the same|
|US20110172781 *||Jul 14, 2011||Biomet Manufacturing Corp.||Elbow prosthesis|
|US20110230972 *||Sep 17, 2010||Sep 22, 2011||Biomet Manufacturing Corp.||Elbow resurfacing prosthesis|
|US20140350684 *||Aug 7, 2014||Nov 27, 2014||Linares Medical Devices, Llc||Implantable elbow joint assembly with spherical inter-support|
|DE2811331A1 *||Mar 16, 1978||Sep 27, 1979||Schuett & Grundei Sanitaet||Ellenbogengelenk in form einer endovollprothese|
|DE3315401A1 *||Apr 28, 1983||Oct 31, 1984||Feldmuehle Ag||Kniegelenkendoprothese|
|EP0006314A1 *||May 25, 1979||Jan 9, 1980||Thomas Gordon Wadsworth||Elbow prosthesis and instrumentation for implantation of the prosthesis|
|EP0098466A1 *||Jun 23, 1983||Jan 18, 1984||Feldmühle Aktiengesellschaft||Implantable elbow joint|
|EP0201010A2 *||Apr 25, 1986||Nov 12, 1986||Queen's University At Kingston||Elbow Prosthesis|
|EP0801936A2 *||Apr 10, 1997||Oct 22, 1997||CHAS. A. BLATCHFORD & SONS LIMITED||Specification of an artificial limb|
|WO1997007753A1 *||Aug 22, 1996||Mar 6, 1997||Jean Chibrac||Joint prosthesis members and method for making same|
|WO2002043625A1 *||Nov 30, 2001||Jun 6, 2002||Depuy International Limited||A template for a modular joint prosthesis component|
|U.S. Classification||606/86.00R, 623/908, 606/87, 606/102|
|International Classification||A61F2/46, A61F2/30, A61F2/00, A61F2/38|
|Cooperative Classification||A61F2/3804, A61F2002/30823, A61F2002/30963, A61F2002/4623, A61F2002/30131, Y10S623/908, A61F2002/30387, A61F2002/30596, A61F2220/0025, A61F2230/0013, A61F2/30942, A61F2002/3009, A61F2002/3822, A61F2250/0091, A61F2/4657, A61F2/4605|
|European Classification||A61F2/46M, A61F2/30M2, A61F2/38B, A61F2/46B1|