Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3552779 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateJan 5, 1971
Filing dateMay 31, 1968
Priority dateMay 31, 1968
Publication numberUS 3552779 A, US 3552779A, US-A-3552779, US3552779 A, US3552779A
InventorsHenderson Homer I
Original AssigneeHenderson Homer I
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Dual-conduit drill pipe for earth boring
US 3552779 A
Abstract  available in
Images(3)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Jan. 5, 1971 H, HENDERSON I 7 3,552,779 v -DUALCONDUIT DRILL PIPE FOR EARTH BORING I Filed May 51,. 1968 Sheets-Sheet 1 MQT HOMER I. HENDERSON 1 I..HENDERSON 3.552.779

DUALCONDUIT DRILL: PIPE FOR EARTH BORING Filed May 51, 1968 3 Sheets-Sheet 2 T if.

IN V EN TOR.

-|1 HOMER I. HENDERSON H. l. HENDERSON DUAL-CONDULT DRILL PIPE FOR EARTH BORING Jan. 5, 1971 3 Sheets-Sheet 5 Filed May 51, 1968 T+AT FIG. 7

' INVENTOR.

HOMER I. HENDERSON United States Patent 3,552,779 DUAL-CONDUIT DRILL PIPE FOR EARTH BORING Homer I. Henderson, 2220 Live Oak, San Angelo, Tex. 76901 Filed May 31, 1968, Ser. No. 733,350 Int. Cl. F161 39/04 US. Cl. 285-433 2 Claims ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE A dual-conduit drill pipe comprising individual lengths, or joints, which lengths are permanently assembled components forming dual. longitudinal passages, or conduits, and which lengths are adapted to be threadedly connected, one to another, to form a string of dual-conduit drilling pipe. One object of the invention is to solve the high thermal stress problem due to differential thermal expansion experienced in dual-conduit drilling operations, wherein the fluid in one conduit may be .at a considerably higher temperature than the fluid in the other conduit. For shallow drilling this is herein accomplished by extruding a dualconduit section of a soft, low strength aluminum alloy, with the high thermal conductivity of the aluminum alloy providing a heat exchange factor sufiicie-nt to reduce the differential temperature and hence the thermal stress to safe values. Intermediate depth drilling requires higher strength aluminum alloys, and these cannot be extruded in such a full section, multiple-void, hollow-shape and consequently two extrusions are made and assembled by welding in such a manner as to provide for limited, relative longitudinal movement and expansion of the inner tube. Deep drilling requires a high strength, high hardness aluminum alloy and such an alloy can be extruded onlyas cylinders, or tubes, at this stage of the extrusion art. Consequently, for deep drilling the outer tube has welded thereto longitudinal, inwardly projecting, fins to space and retain the inner tube and to provide for relative longitudinal movement and expansion. For extreme depth drilling the latter construction can be of steel. The lightness of aluminum is desirable in a drill pipe, in all respects except for imposing weight on the drill bit. To solve this shortcoming, there is a disclosed, special, heavy, dual-conduit drill pipe of steel, that is immune to buckling when caused by minor differential thermal expansion, found at the bottom of the hole.

, For purposes of simplicity and clarity a dual-conduit drill pipe may be considered as comprising two main portions; an outer tube, and a concentric inner tube with the annulus between the tubes forming one flow conduit, and the bore of the inner tube the second flow conduit. The outer tube having a heavier wall than the innertube, and designed to take the strains of torque and tension imposed by drilling processes. It is often termed the drill tube. The inner tube is often termed the core tube inasmuch as its main function is to provide an inner flow conduit for the drilling fluid to return to the earths surface and thereby transport the bit cuttings, and, or cores, to the earths surface.

Earth boring with multiple-conduit drill pipe has been attempted and practiced for several decades. Still, however, there is no satisfactory drill pipe. The first attempts were with multiple concentrically assembled tubes, rigidly connected one to the other. It was found in drilling that the difference in temperature of the descending fluid and ascending fluid, caused a similar difference of temperature in the walls of the conduits, and consequently differential thermal expansion (or contraction) resulting in thermal stresses sufficient to bend the as- "ice sembly, resulting in flexing of the drill pipe, and causing crooked holes, stuck pipe, and pipe failures.

Attempts have been made in dual-conduit pipe, as in applicants Pat. No. 3,208,539, to use an outer tube and a concentric inner tube spaced with spacing fins welded on the inner tube and with one end of the inner tube rigidly secured to said outer tube by welding and the other end engaging a sealing sleeve of the mating length of pipe, with said unwelded end free to expand and contract thermally in said sleeve. This was a partial solution of the problem, but left several unsatisfactory conditions: (1) To get the spacing fins into, or out of, the outer pipe it was necessary to use internal flush pipe which is prohibitive with practical wall thicknesses because of weakness at the joints. (2) For long life drill pipe it is essential to use thick-wall tool joints. Attempts have been made to use such by substituting spacing springs for the spacing fins, but vibration plus galvanic corrosion of the inner pipe has resulted in early failure of the springs and inner tube. (3) It has been found impractical to securely weld the spacing fins at one end to the inside of the outer pipe. (4) It has been found that due to corrosion and abrasion that several thin-walled inner tubes will fail during the life of an outer tube, and that inner tube removal and replacement is difficult and expensive.

One object of this invention is to provide a dual-conduit drill pipe in which the heat exchange coefficientbetween the walls of the two conduits is sufficiently high, so that in normal drilling the temperature difference of fluid in the two conduits is reduced to where the differential thermal stress in the conduit walls is sufficiently low as to be tolerable.

Another object of this invention is to provide a dualconduit drill pipe connected by relatively thick walled steel tool joints.

Another object of this invention is to provide a dualconduit drill pipe wherein the inner core tube shares the tensional stress when excessive tensional strain is put on the outer drill pipe.

An object of the invention is to provide a dual-conduit drill pipe wherein the inner tube can be removed, and replaced, with facility in the field, and without any dismantling or damage to the outer pipe or tool joint.

A further object of the invention is to provide dualconduit drill pipe wherein the inner tube is free to move longitudinally, and expand or contract, relative to the outer tube, within limits.

Still a further object of the invention is to provide a heavy, warp-resisting, all-steel, dual-conduit drill collar to put weight on the drill bit when used in conjunction with aluminum dual-tube drill pipe.

Another object of this invention is economy. By extruding the full section of the drill pipe, or just the outer tube and fins, a big reduction in shop time and expense is effected, reducing considerably the per foot cost of dual-conduit pipe.

Another object of this invention is to provide a dualconduit drill pipe that is relatively light in weight to facilitate handling and to increase the maximum length of pipe that a given drill rig can handle.

Other objects and advantages of this invention will become apparent from the description with the accompanying drawings wherein:

FIG. 1 is a longitudinal vertical sectional view taken on line 11 of FIG. 2, and is an embodiment of this invention adapted for shallow depth drilling.

FIG. 2 is a sectional view taken on line 22 of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a longitudinal sectional view, taken on line 33 of FIG. 4, and is an embodiment of this invention adapted for intermediate depth drilling.

FIG. 4 is a sectional view taken on line 44 of FIG. 3.

FIG. 5 is a cross sectional view of an embodiment of this invention adapted for deep drilling.

FIG. 6 is a cross sectional view of a dual-conduit drill collar, adapted for this invention. The section was taken on line 66 of FIG. 7.

FIG. 7 is a longitudinal sectional view taken on line 7-7 of FIG. 6.

The preferred embodiment of this invention for shallow drilling is shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2. The dualconduit drill pipe 10 is an aluminum alloy extruded as a multi-void, hollow-shape as shown by FIG. 2. This aluminum alloy may be 6063-T6, with a tensional yield strength of 31,000 p.s.i. and a hardness of 80 BHN. The length of these extrusions is normally determined by the length of the drills mast and, whether or not, the drill pipe is handled manually. The ends of the outer tube 11 are cut to length and internally threaded to receive their respective sections of the steel tool joints, box 14, and pin 15, as shown in FIG. 1. The upper end of the inner tube (core tube) 12 is cut to length as shown by 22, and the end chamfered. A sleeve 19, carrying an O- ring 21 is fitted on the upper end of 22 and welded as at 20. The sleeve 19 may be placed at either end of the inner tube, if so elected, but the election cannot be varied in a single drill pipe string. The lower end of the core tube 12 is cut to length as at 18 and the end is internally tapered as shown. A small gap 47 is left between the ends of the core tube segments 18 and 22 to provide for shop error and differential thermal expansion between the aluminum segments 18 and 22, and the steel joints 14 and 15. The steel tool joints are conventional. The threads 16 may be coated with epoxy cement just prior to make-up, to assure that this threaded connection will not loosen in service. This connection can be broken if heated moderately. The arrows 23 show the direction of fluid flow. A core rising in the core tube is shown at 24.

It will be seen that these lengths can be assembled, as in FIG. 1, to form a string of dual-conduit drill pipe. The drilling fluid descends in the tube annulus 48 between the outer tube 11 and the inner tube 12. The drilling fluid ascends within the core tube 12.

Upon examination of the cross section FIG. 2, it will be recognized that this dual-conduit is an excellent counter-flow heat exchanger. The surfaces A, B, C, D, FIG. 2, are all at the same temperature, the temperature of the turbulently flowing fluid in this annulus. This large surface area of equal temperature tends to stabilize distortion of the drill pipe due to differential thermal expansion.

The thermal conductivity of aluminum, at the temperatures involved, averages 118 B.t.u./hr./sq. ft./degree F./ foot of thickness; while the conductivity of steel is 26 B.t.u. The ratio of these conductivities:

This is one big advantage when using aluminum instead of steel, for dual-tube drill pipe. A second reason based on the physical properties is the specific weights: steel is 0.283 1b., while aluminum is 0.100 1b., both per cu. in., and the ratio is 1/2.83, therefore aluminum pipe is a great favorite with men who must handle drill pipe.

The analysis of the differential thermal expansion stresses for dual-tube drill pipe is best made by starting at the bottom of the bore hole, where the temperature differential is known. Referring now to FIG. 7, which is drill collar on the bottom of the hole. The arrows 40 indicate the fluid flow direction, down in the tube annulus 48, and up in the core tube 33. Consider the section just above the bit, where the fluid in the annulus is just entering the bit nozzle and is at some temperature T. After this fluid has passed through the bit and is entering the core tube, it has an increased temperature 4 T-l-AT due to the fluid friction in the nozzles and the bit passages.

When drilling with water, and with a 4 /2 inch O.D. drill pipe, it is customary to circulate 2 bbl./min., and the pressure drop across the bit is then normally 100 p.s.i. the hydraulic horsepower of this bit flow:

HP=g.p.m. x p.s.i./1714:84 x 100/17l4=4.9 HP 1 HP is equivalent to 42.44 B.t.u./rnin., and 4.9 HP=208 B.t.u./min. Assume that all of this energy went into heating the fluid (which it does not). A flow of 2 bbl./ min. is 700 lbs. of water/min. One B.t.u. isdeflned as that quantity of heat required to raise the temperature of 1 lb. of water 1 F. Therefore the temperature rise in the water:

20.29? B.t.u./lb. or AT=0.297 F.

Such a small temperature differential will cause insignifi cant stress in the pipe. The temperature differential continues to increase, however, as the fluid in the core tube moves upward since the earths temperature gradient is approximately 1 F./ 100 ft. When the fluid has moved upward 1000 ft., it is positioned where the earths temperature is 10 F. cooler than at the bottom of the hole. For simplicity, assume that the fluid in the pipe annulus at that point is also 10 F. cooler than at the hole bottom. The error due to this assumption is on the safe side as tests have shown that when drilling the fluid never reaches a temperature as high as the temperature of the formations, because of the low coefficient of heat conduction of the earths formations. If the fluid is allowed to remain static in the hole for several days, then it does reach formation temperature. In practice the fluid velocity in the core tube is 7.2 ft. sec., or 430 ft./min. The mass flow rate is 700 lbs/min. It is desired to find the required differential temperature across the core tube which will assure that the differential temperature between up-flowing and down-flowing streams will be constant. That is, the up-flowing stream will lose heat to the down-flowing stream equivalent to 1 F./100 ft. A normal core tube for 4 /2 in. drill pipe is: O.D.=2.500 in. I.D. =2.l87 in. and wall thickness=.156 in. The following formulas are from Marks Mechanical Engineers Handbook, 6th ed., pp. 4-100 and ff: q:UA(AT) where q=rate of flow, B.t.u./hr., U the over-all coeflicient of heat transfer; B.t.u./hr. sq. ft./ F.; A=area in sq. ft.; (AT) :the logarithmic means of the temperature difference. To evaluate 1 l h A hoA can be combined to l/h A Where It, is the coefiicient of heat transfers of the hot side film; h is the coeflicient of heat transfer of the cold side film; h is the mean average of h and h A is the area (sq. ft.) of each quantity, h is the coeflicient of heat transfer of the scale deposit; X is the thickness of metal wall in feet; and K is the coeflicient of conductivity of the metal.

With an aluminum core tube of the above dimensions,

and 100 ft. long:

1 1 1 X 1 1 .013 74 h A h,,A,, K/1 49,600 33,500 7,200

UA- --19,300 B.t.u./hr. through 100ft. of tube/ 1 F.

In one minute 700-lb. of new water comes into this 100 ft. section and 700 lbs. leaves it. If this 700 lbs. is to lose sufficient heat to reduce its temperature 1 F. then 700 B.t.u. transfer is required/min, Therefore:

q=700=322(AT) and AT=%;=2.2 F.

This indicates that as the fluid in the aluminum core tube moves upwardly from the bit, it soon reaches a point where it is 2.2 hotter than the fluid in the pipe annulus at the same horizon, and continues to lose heat at a rate to retain this temperature differential as it moves up the hole. i

To determine if such a differential temperature is structurally dangerous, we use the formula S=CE(AT) where S=stress, p.s.i., C=temperature coefficient, and AT is in F. For aluminum:

C=.000013, E=Youngs modulus= 10 p.s.i., and

AT=2.2 F.

Stress=S=.000013(10 10 )2.2=286 p.s.i.

The formula for allowable stress on an aluminum column from Roarks Formulas for Stress and Strain, 3rd ed., p. 238:

where L=column length in inches (assume each length to be 30 ft.), r=radius of gyration, in.

Allowable stress S Actually the factor of safety is larger than this since the beneficial heat conduction of the webs was not considered, for simplification reasons.

The extruded section, being integral, with full length web, has a section modulus greater than the section shown in the above patent.

FIG. 3 and FIG. 4 show a modification of this invention for moderate depth drilling. Due to the increase in depth, it must use an aluminum alloy of higher strength. By simplifying the extrusion section of FIG. 2 to that of FIG. 4 the aluminum alloy 6061 can be successfully extruded. It has a yield strength of 40,000 p.s.i., a 29% increase over the strongest alloy extrudable in the section of FIG. 2. In this modification a separate core tube 42 is used. A positioning sleeve 44, slotted to receive the webs 43 is welded onto this tube as shown. The core tube 42 is then inserted in the cavity left by the radial webs 43, and on the opposite end of the core tube is welded another positioning sleeve 45, also slotted to receive the webs 43. The sleeve 45 and the sealing O-ring sleeve 19 may both be welded to the core tube 42, as shown at 20A. It will be seen that in no place is the core tube welded to the drill tube 41 or the fins 43. The core tube 42 is free to move longitudinally relative to the outer tube 41, within limits. The gap 46 permits that amount of stretch of the drill tube 41 without subjecting the thin core tube 42 to stress. Since the fins are on the drill tube 41, they share in the tension load and after they contact the sleeve 44, the core tube must also share the load, which is highly desirable. In some areas where tension loads are severe, it may be desirable to reduce the length of the gap 46, even to zero. The gap 47 permits the core tube to lengthen thermally relative to drill tube 41. The weld 20A is near the open end of the tool joint box -14, so that it is accessible and easily Welded in the field, and just as easily cut out for field replacement of the core tube. It will be observed that the core tube is 6 free to thermally extend or contract. Innormal drilling the fluid in the core tube is always hotter than the fluid in the tube annulus 48, and any differential temperature results in a relative lengthening of the core tube, and this increase in length is accommodated by the tolerance gap 47.

The groove 25 in the tool joint is to receive a Special elevator which elevator has an inwardly protruding flange to engage this groove.

For deep drilling the hardest and strongest possible aluminum alloy is desired, such as the 7075 alloy used in conventional drill pipe (yield strength 72,000 p.s.i.). Even the simple section of FIG. 4 cannot be extruded using this alloy and a simple tube 45 must be substituted therefore. In this case I prefer to carefully shop weld 57 the webs 49 onto this tube 45 as shown in FIG. 5, otherwise the construction is as shown in FIG. 3. It is preferable that these webs extend the full length of the drill tube 45 like those shown in FIG. 3. These fins can be resistance welded, or flash welded, or they can be edge welded, or, at intervals the tube 45 can be drilled and the fin and tube plug welded. Short segments of the full length webs 49, welded at each end will suffice, but some vibration of fins and core tube 42, will result in premature failure. Even an all steel construction can be used in the construction of FIG. 5 by providing sufficient gap spaces '46 and 47. The fans 50, are for centering.

In all drilling it is desirable that the drill pipe be free from compression. This is especially true of aluminum drill pipe. To assure that the drill pipe will be free of compression, a section of heavy, steel, dual-conduit drill pipe (normally termed drill collar) as shown in FIGS. 6 and 7, should be used with aluminum drill pipe to provide all the weight to be needed on the bit. This is quite similar to the drill pipe of my patent, cited above, except the outer tube 30 is exceedingly heavy. Much to heavy to be practical for drill pipe. This heavy construction has a three-fold purpose: (1) to provide as much weight as feasible per foot of length; (2) to provide sufficient metal in the drill tube 30 so that there is not undue weakness at the threads 31; (3) to assure that any stress in the thin-walled core tube 33, does not distort the thick-walled drill tube 30.

As discussed above, the temperature difference, between the pipe annulus fluid and the core tube fluid, at a point just above the bit is approximately 03 F. This is a negligible amount. As a consequence the core tube 33 can be rigidly connected at both its ends, to the drill tube 30, as shown at 35 and 38. This practice can be continued even though there be 200 feet of drill collar, since the temperature differential at the top (200 feet above the bit) is only 2+0.3=2.-3 F. It will be noted in FIG. 6 that the volume of metal in the drill tube 30 is many times the volume of metal in the core tube. The stress in the steel core tube with a temperature differential of 2.3 F., is:

S=CE(AT) Stress=S= (6.5 10- (30 X'10 )2.3 :450 p.s.i.

O.D. X 0.674

inch wall thickness with a moment of inertia=15.28 inches. The ratio of the stiffness modules of these two tubes:

Hence, it is obvious that a thermal stress of 450 p.s.i. in the inner tube will not cause measurable deflection of the outer tube, and that an all-welded rigid construction is feasible near the bottom of the hole. It is important that the fins 34, welded to the inner tube 33, be of such a width as to snugly fit the inner walls of the outer tube 30, and that they be spaced at short intervals, to prevent vibration of the tube 33, and to prevent eccentricities and/0r deflections that might result in wrinkling the thin walls of the stressed tube 33.

Although I have described my invention with a degree of particularity, it is understood that the present disclosure has been made only by way of example, and that numerous changes in the details of construction and the combination and arrangement of parts may be resorted to without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as hereinafter claimed.

Having described my invention, I claim:

1. In a dual-conduit drill pipe comprising an outer tube, an inner tube, support means concentrically supporting the said inner tube within the said outer tube, the annulus between said tubes forming one flow conduit, the bore of said inner tube forming a second fiow conduit, a box tool joint on one end of the said outer tube and a pin tool joint on the opposite end of the said outer tube threadedly and sealably connecting lengths of like said dual-conduit drill pipe when in a string of such pipe, said inner tube having a sealing sleeve on one characteristic end, said sealing sleeve sealingly engaging the non-characteristic end of the inner tube of the adjacent length of like pipe when in a connecting string, the improvement comprising:

said outer tube having longitudinal webs extending radially inward to the surface of the said concentric inner tube,

said Webs slidably supporting said inner tube,

said inner tube having secured on each end thereof, positioning sleeves that are axially slotted to slid ably receive the ends of said webs,

said slotted sleeves engaging said webs thereby preventing the said inner tube from rotating relative to said outer tube and limiting the longitudinal movement of the inner tube relative to the outer tube.

2. The drill pipe defined by claim 1 wherein:

the said outer tube, said inner tube, and said webs are made of aluminum metal.

References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,850,264 9/1958 Grable 285-133(A) 3,065,807 11/1962 Wells 285-133(A) 3,126,214 3/1964 Wong et al. 285-173 3,208,539 9/1965 Henderson 285133(A) FOREIGN PATENTS 226,173 3/1963 Austria 285133 228,017 6/1963 Austria 285-133 235,093 8/1964 Austria 285-433 THOMAS P. CALLAGHAN, Primary Examiner US. Cl. X.R.

Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3998479 *Dec 23, 1974Dec 21, 1976Smith International, Inc.Dual conduit drill stem member and connection
US4012061 *Dec 23, 1974Mar 15, 1977Smith International, Inc.Dual conduit drill stem member
US4236953 *Nov 21, 1978Dec 2, 1980Tokan Kogyo Co., LtdProcess for producing thermoplastic multi-walled pipes
US4566435 *Oct 15, 1982Jan 28, 1986Kabushiki Kaisha Komatsu SeisakushoSolar heat collecting apparatus
US4759571 *Oct 31, 1986Jul 26, 1988D. W. Zimmerman Mfg., Inc.Fluid transfer module with multiple flow paths
US4940098 *May 26, 1989Jul 10, 1990Moss Daniel HReverse circulation drill rod
US5799834 *Jun 18, 1997Sep 1, 1998Marley PumpTelescoping column pipe assembly for fuel dispensing pumping systems
US5853113 *Oct 21, 1996Dec 29, 1998Marley PumpTelescoping column pipe assembly for fuel dispensing pumping systems
US5862871 *Feb 20, 1996Jan 26, 1999Ccore Technology & Licensing Limited, A Texas Limited PartnershipAxial-vortex jet drilling system and method
US5921441 *Jul 2, 1998Jul 13, 1999Marley PumpTelescoping column pipe assembly for fuel dispensing pumping systems
US6464261 *Mar 23, 1999Oct 15, 2002Reslink AsPipe coupling
US7044232Feb 11, 2005May 16, 2006Zenith Oilfield Technology LimitedWell apparatus connection assembly
US8770628 *May 16, 2012Jul 8, 2014Reelwell, A.S.Seal assembly for nested dual drill pipe
US20130181439 *May 16, 2012Jul 18, 2013Espen AlhaugSeal assembly for nested dual drill pipe
EP0289673A1 *May 6, 1987Nov 9, 1988Pangaea Enterprises, Inc.Drill pipes and casings utilizing multi-conduit tubulars
EP0518254A2 *Jun 9, 1992Dec 16, 1992Steuler-Industriewerke GmbHDouble walled pipe and method of assembling the same
WO1986004950A1 *Feb 21, 1986Aug 28, 1986Raufoss AmmunisjonsfabrikkerDrilling pipe for making a drill string
Classifications
U.S. Classification285/123.3, 285/333
International ClassificationE21B21/12, E21B21/00, E21B17/18, E21B17/00
Cooperative ClassificationE21B17/00, E21B21/12, E21B17/18
European ClassificationE21B17/18, E21B17/00, E21B21/12