Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3567026 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateMar 2, 1971
Filing dateSep 20, 1968
Priority dateSep 20, 1968
Publication numberUS 3567026 A, US 3567026A, US-A-3567026, US3567026 A, US3567026A
InventorsKolm Henry H
Original AssigneeMassachusetts Inst Technology
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Magnetic device
US 3567026 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

U United States Patent 13,567,026

[72] Inventor Henry H. Kolm OTHER REFERENCES Mead, Wayland Mm Diffusion of Eddy Currents;'K. w. Atwood and 11. L. Libby, [21] PP 7614,48 A.E.C. Research and Development Report, Hanford Labora- 1221 Wed Sept-20,1968 tories, Richland, Washington, December 1963 (Group 260- g"- sum n h I (:1 324 Subclass 40) Sslgnee use n cc no ogy Superconducting Magnets, Hulm et al.. p. 50, int. Sci. and

Cambndge Mass Tech. May, 1963 Auslegeschrift 1012871, Werner, Oct. 14, 1952 [54] MAGNETIC DEVICE Primary Examiner-Reuben Friedman 4 Claims, 7 Drawing Figs. Assistant Examiner-T. A. Granger [52] 210/222 Attorneys-Thomas Cooch, Martin M. Santa and Robert Shaw [51] 801d 35/06 [50] Field of Search 210/222,

ADSTRACT; Apparatus for separating colloidal and subcolloidal ceramlc magnetic components from a slurry by passmg [56] References Cited the slurry through a column containing a magnetic material, as

UNITED STATES PATENTS a magnetic grade stainless steel wool. The steel vvool is sub- 2 430 157 11/1947 Byrd Jr. 209/232x lected K DC magnet field i magnemimn P 2786047 3/1957 Jones; et a] 210 ,223X and provides a large number of regions; of very high magnetic 2 954 122 9/1960 Colbum i l 2l0/222X field gradient along the paths of travel of the slurry to attract 3l5O291 9/1964 La uer 33 5/21 6X and retam the magnetic components. At intervals, the DC 3177408 4/1965 fl at 335/216) magneticfield is removed, and the steel wool is demagnetized. 3239725 3/1966 a 335/216 A preferred method of demagnetization is the application of 3,279,602 10/1966 Kofienstenegtgiu 209/223x an AC magnetic field, upon removal of the DC field, the AC 3394330 7/1968 Schindler 335/216 field being gradually reduced to zero. Eddy current means is provided to apply an eddy current field to the steel wool to FOREIGN PATENTS shake the components from said regions of the steel wool dur- 801,003- 9/1958 Great Britain 210/223 ing the intervals.

PATENTEU UAR -2 SHEET 2 OF 2 \NWn I i 1" I llillu 25 l9 FIG. 4 22 CURRENT SUPPLY L 27 nemAe wsglzm /36 6 CURRENT SLOW-RISING NC 28 CURRENT FAST RISING 29 A-C C CURRENT 4a as I m FIG. 6A

40 41 Q E TIME 2 1/ 311/ 2 1r INVENTOR E HENR .KOLM 2 FIG. as BY 2%- TTORNEY MAGNETHC DEVICE This invention was made in thecourse of work performed under a contract with the Air Force Office of Scientific Research.

The present invention relates to separators adapted to remove magnetic and conductive nonmagnetic components from a slurry, the nonmagnetic components being removed by novel eddy current means other than separator apparatus.

it is frequently desirable to separate magnetic components from a slurry of predominantly nonmagnetic particles suspended in water or some other vehicle. The problem arises, for example, in ore dressing where the magnetic component may be an impurity or a usable mineral, and in the food industry where the magnetic component may be harmful steel chips introduced during a processing operation. To perform this separating function a number, of wet separators? are in commen use. All of these rely on the technique of magnetizing the magnetic component by means of an applied magnetic field and simultaneously subjecting the magnetized particles to a divergent (fringing) magnetic field, that is, a magnetic gradient. The magnetic force experienced by each particle is directly proportional to three quantities: the induced magnetization of the particle, the size of the particle and the magnetic gradient. .The effectiveness of a magnetic separator is directly dependent upon this magnetic force since this is the force which holds the magnetic particles against the competing forces of viscosity, turbulence and gravitation. Very little can be done to enhance the first of these quantities, the induced magnetization. lf the substance being separated is ferromagnetic, its magnetization saturates in a moderate magnetic field and does not increase at higher field intensities. If the substance is paramagnetic, its magnetization increases linearly with the applied field intensity but is usually too weak in fields which can be applied in practice to be useful for separation although, as later discussed herein, the advent of practical superconducting magnets makes paramagnetic substances susceptible to magnetic separation on an industrial scale. The second quantity, particle size, is dictated by the intirnacy of admixture of the magnetic component; and this usually (at least on the applications of most interest) requires that the parent substance be ground to colloidal size before magnetic separation can be effected. The third quantity, mag netic field gradient, therefore, is the crucial variable in the process; and its enhancement is of primary concern to designers. It is necessary not only to achieve the strongest possible field gradient, but also to produce it over a surface area large enough'to collect a reasonable quantity of magnetic material before the capacity of the separator is exhausted. To achieve this aim, designers of the prior art use serrated steel plates, steel balls, wire mesh screens and ribbon mesh screens, usually arranged in multiple layers bridging the gap of an electromagnet. The types of separators justdescribed are adequate only for separating magnetic particles of coarse size present in small quantities, and even under such favorable conditions their collecting area is so small that they require elaborate mechanical devices to move new collecting areas into the magnet continuously while the saturated area is being washed. The gradients produced in these known fabricated structures are so weak that effective separation requires flow rates so slow and retention times so long as to be unrealistic for industrial application in the majority of cases. It has been proposed, also, to provide loosely packed steel wool and iron filings as the magnetic filtration material, the material being placed between poles of permanent magnets, which rarely provide fields above 500 gauss, and electromagnets designed to achieve magnetic fields below 5,000 gauss. These latter separators fail to provide the high field gradients hereinafter discussed, and, furthermore, are not useful in connection with corrosive materials of great commercial interest as, for example, kaolin slurries, but appear to be useful for removing highly magnetizable particles from noncorrosive petroleum slurries.

Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a separator employing a corrosion resistant ferromagnetic wool or the like adapted to remove magnetic components from a slurry or the like more completely and efficiently than is possible with the before-mentioned separators.

A further object is to provide separator apparatus which is adapted to remove colloidal and subcolloidal ferromagnetic components from a slurry or the like but which can be used to remove colloidal and subcolloidal ceramic magnetic components and paramagnetic components as well, and on an industrial scale.

In separators of the present invention, the ferromagnetic wool is placed in a high DC magnetic field which is reduced to zero at regular intervals ,to permit removal of trapped components from the wool by flushing. It has been found, however, that the wool retains some residual magnetization, and for this and other reasons a sizable amount of the components are not flushed from the separator. A further object of the invention is to provide means, and particularly eddy current means, adapted to vibratethe wool to shake loose retained components during the intervals of flushing.

Although the eddy current concept is particularly useful for the purposes discussed in the previous paragraph, it will be apparent in the discussion to'follow that it has other novel utility as well. A still further object is, therefore, to provide eddy current apparatus of more general utility, including apparatus adapted to remove conductive particles, magnetic or nonmagnetic, from a slurry.

Other and still further objects will be evident in the specification to follow and will be'particularly delineated in the appended claims.

By way of summary, the objects of the invention are attained, generally, in a magnetic separator adapted to remove magnetic components from a slurry or the like, that comprises, a magnetic material comprising randomly oriented corrosion resistant fibers adapted to provide a plurality of paths therethrough to effect intimate contact between the slurry and the fibers. Inlet means is provided to. introduce the slurry to the column and outlet means to remove'the slurry therefrom. Magnetizing means is provided to effect magnetization of the magnetic material. The fibers are compressed to a density sufficiently high to provide a multiplicity of regions of very high magnetic field gradient within the space occupied by the material to attract and retain the magnetic components at said reg ons.

The invention will now be described with reference to the accompany drawings in which:

FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of an embodiment of the present invention showing two columns for receiving a slurry containing magnetic components which are removed from the slurry and retained within the columns;

FIG. 2 is an isometric view, partially cutaway, of one column, and shows a magnetic material comprising randomly oriented corrosion resistant fibers adapted to separate the magnetic components from the slurry;

FIG. 3 is an isometric view showing a plurality of such columns disposed between magnetic pole pieces with a central magnetic core and coil adapted to magnetize the pole pieces;

FIG. 4 is a three dimensional view, on an enlarged scale, of two of the fibers shown in FIG. 2;

FIG. 5 is a view taken upon the line 5-5 in FIG. 4 looking in the direction of the arrows;

FIG. 6A is a schematic representation showing a column similar to the columns of FIG. 1 with means for magnetizing and demagnetizing the magnetic material within the columns and having, also, means for applying magnetic pulses to the material to effect vibration thereof, there being shown, as well, also schematically, an eddy current means for removing conductive materials, magnetic or nonmagnetic, from a slurry; and

FIG. 6B is a graph showing a sinusoidal wave to provide a slow-rising field for the eddy current means and a square wave to provide a fast-rising field therefore.

Referring now to FlG. l a magnetic separator 1 is shown for removing magnetic components, as steel particles or the like, from a slurry containing water or some other vehicle as the fluid carrier. The separator is useful to remove such magnetic components which may appear in the slurry as a foreign matter, or, in some instances, the magnetic components may be separated out for their own use. The separator l illustrated consists of two nonmagnetic casing tubes or columns designated 2 and 3, each of which contains a corrosion resistant magnetic material d, as shown in FIG. 2. As explained hereinafter, there are times when two or more such columns may be used; but, for purposes of explanation at this point, it is necessary to refer to only one; and for that purpose the explanation now to be made will be made with reference to the column designated 2. The column 2 may be a single column, as that shown in H6. 2, or it may consist of the plurality of the individual columns in FIG. 3 which may be connected in series or parallel to provide a composite column 2.

A preferred magnetic material 4 is a fine steel wool of magnetic grade stainless steel.(other corrosion resistant ferromagnetic wools as nickel or others may be used) adapted to provide a plurality of paths therethrough to effect intimate contact between the slurry and the magnetic material, the slurry being introduced to the column through an inlet 5 and being removed therefrom through an outlet 5. The steel wool is compressed to a density which gives it the desired specific magnetic reluctance, and, as later discussed herein, enough magnetic flux leaks through the voids between individual randomly oriented steel wool strands to create a column having a large number of regions of high magnetic gradient. The column 2 is subjected to a magnetic field by placing it with a coil 6, or the magnetizing means may be a yoke comprising a core 8 coupled at the ends thereof to a pair of pole plates 9 and It The fibrous material 4 is compressed to a density sufficiently high to provide a multiplicity of regions of very high magnetic field gradient within the column to attract and retain the magnetic components; it has been found, for present purposes, that the material should be compressed to achieve a specific permeability of the order of one-fourth to threefourths the bulk reluctance of the steel wool or other ferromagnetic material of which the material 4 is made.

The present invention is, thus, adapted to provide a large number of regions of high magnetic field gradient, as more particularly explained hereinafter, along the paths of travel of the slurry to attract and retain the magnetic components. To affect the slurry, the regions mentioned must exist in the space through which the slurry passes in its movement through the column 2. If, for example, the reluctance of the magnetic material 4 in the column is nearly equal to the bulk reluctance thereof, the magnetic flux will be confined to the interior of the material 4; and little or no flux (i.e. environmental or background field) will be found in the path of travel of the slurry. On the other hand, as the amount of magnetic material approaches zero, the reluctance of the column will approach the reluctance of air, resulting in low flux density in the column 2 and effectively no regions of high magnetic field gradient. Thus, if the reluctance is too low, there is, in effect, a magnetic short circuit; and if it is too high, there is an open circuit. Magnetic steel wool is particularly suited for present purposes because the individual strands of the wool have directional and other discontinuities that cause magnetic flux to leave a strand and pass through the adjacent space. Thus, as the slurry passes axially through the column 2, the paths of travel provide intimate contact between the slurry and the magnetic material 4 at a multiplicity of regions of very high magnetic field gradient.

As previously mentioned, the vehicle or carrier fluid of the slurry can be water. Although other carrier fluids are of interest, water slurries are commercially of great importance; and it is necessary, when removing magnetic components, as here, from water or other corrosive slurries, that the material 4 used be corrosion resistant. Corrosion is particularly harmful in separators of the present type because, in addition to destroying the complete fibers of the wool, it has the immediate effect of removing the serrated edges of the wool upon which the effectiveness of the present devices to a considerable extent depends, as later discussed in greater detail with particular reference to FIGS. 3 and 5. To prevent the harmful effects of corrosion in the present device, a magnetic grade stainless steel wool is used as the material 4.

The magnetics of the present invention will now be explained with particular reference to FIGS. 4 and 5, where two filaments or fibers of the material 4 are shown at l5 and 16. Assuming a DC magnetic field in the vertical or Y direction shown, a magnetic flux will exist, as represented, for example, by the lines designated 24. The flux lines will enter the fiber 15 to remain there for various distances depending, in part, upon the contour of the fiber in an X-Y or Y-Z plane. Thus, the flux 24 will leave the fiber l5 (and also the fiber 16) to create regions 18, 19 and 19, of very high magnetic field gradient within the volume of the material 4. The flux lines in the vicinity of the region 18 are numbered 20, 21 and 22. The lines 20 and 21 pass into the fiber 15, out into the region 18 and thence into the fiber l6 whereasthe flux line 22 passes directly from the fiber 15 to the fiber H6 at the point of contact therebetween, designated 17. When fibers are used for the material 4, most of the flux passes through the region 18 as the point contact at 17 is a low reluctancepath, and the fiber becomes saturated in the vicinity of the point as the cross dimensions thereof decrease. Furthermore, a large percentage of the contacts between fibers are of the point type shown in FIG. 4 so there is little tendency for a magnetic short circuit to exist. Also a large percentage of the volume occupied by the fibers consists of the regions such as 18, so there is, in a given volume, a considerable collecting area per unit volume available for retention of the magnetic components. Furthermore, the serrated profile of the fibers offers a large number of valleys, as 25, which also provide collection regions of high field gradient for the components. It should be noted, in this connection, that the magnetic components as they accumulate tend to short circuit the gaps, such as 18, thereby to reduce its effectiveness; thus, the increase in the percentage of the volume occupied by such regions is of more than negligible importance, and the detrimental effect of corrosion is evident.

The importance of a high field gradient can best be explained with reference to FIG. 5, where induced north and south poles within the fibers l5 and 16 are designated N,, S and N S respectively, and the induced poles in a magnetic component 14 therebetween are designated N S The poles N S have equal magnitude; so if the values of S and N are also equal and if the particle 14 is located-half way between S and N no movement will occur. Any change in the position toward either S or N will result in an unbalanced force upon the particle and movement toward the closest pole, assuming no other forces. But other forces as that due to slurry movement through the column 2, turbulence of the like tend to sweep the particle 14 away from either S or N Only if the gradient is high and the forces due to S and N change very rapidly with changes in spatial position toward or away from either, will attraction be effective to remove and retain the components. In the present device, as mentioned, very high magnetic gradients are present.

The importance of the reluctance of the steel wool in the column 2 also becomes clearer after the explanation in the previous two paragraphs. As mentioned, when the fibers are saturated, the flux leaves the fibers at places of reduced cross dimensions; that is, at places where the reluctance in the fibers becomes greater than the reluctance ofthe adjacent air space, and the flux leaves also at places where the fibers are oriented to cross the field. And it is the flux lines (i.e. environmental or background field) in the adjacent air space which affect the magnetic components. But when the f eld strength within the volume occupied by the material 4 is low due, for example, to the high reluctance path in prior art devices resulting from the loosely packed wool, there is a tendency for the flux lines to pass through the fibers rather than into the space adjacent.

Therefore, three unfavorable conditions exist in separators with loosely packed steel wool: first, the field in the column is less for a given exciting field as might be effected between the pole plates 9 and 10; second, an inordinate amount of the magnetic flux in the column passes along through the fibers; and third, the distance between fibers will, on the average, be

greater. The level of magnetic field gradient that exists in an operating separator is lessened due to the third condition discussed, and the number of regions where a field gradient exists is lessened due to the first and second conditions.

For the foregoing reasons the present device has many more collection points or stations for the magnetic components in-a given volume than are present in priordevices, the regions of such points have a greater magnetic gradient than prior devices, and magnetic short circuits which become more pronounced as magnetic components are collected do not build as rapidly as they do in prior devices. Since the capacity of the present apparatus to retain the magnetic components far exceeds the capacity of prior devices, it can be used to filter magnetic components from a far greater quantity of slursubcolloidal particles are removed with facility by apparatus embodying the present inventive concept.

As magnetic components are collected by the wool in in creasing quantity, they gradually short circuit the collection regions forming paths for magnetic flux which bridge the magnetic gap. The paths are periodically broken during demagnetization, flushing and the vibration induced in the manner later discussed. However, to reduce the effect of such paths and other short circuits that occur,- perforated equipotential plates 11 (made of magnetic-type stainless steel, for example) in FIG. 2., having perforation 11', are provided at intervals substantially at right angles to the direction of magnetic flux flow. The plates 11 are sufficiently massive to ensure uniform distribution of magnetic flux over the entire cross section of the separator to, mitigate the bridging effect.

Turning again to'FlG. l, the apparatus illustrated, as mentioned, has two columns, the coil 6 being adapted to create an axial magnetic field irithe column 2 and a further coil 13 being adapted tocreate an axial magnetic field in the column 3. The two columns shown allow cycling of the separator. Thus, a switch 7 may'be closed to energize the coil 6 from a variable voltage DC source 30 while simultaneously removing a voltage from the coil 13, and electrically energizable valves 12 and 12' can be appropriately electrically interconnected to introduce slurry at the input 5 and remove it at 5. At the same time a switch 32' is closed to introduce a voltage from a variable voltage AC source 31 to the coil 13 to remove any residual magnetism from the circuit. Clear water introduced at 33 and removed at 33 flushes magnetic components from the column 3. The switch 7 connected to the coil 6 can then be opened and the DC source 30 connected to the coil 13, and the column 2 can be flushed; a switch 34 and variable voltage AC source 35 serve the same purposes as the elements 32 and 31 before mentioned. Appropriate electrical interconnection to execute the foregoing operations is, of course, provided, and the AC sources 31 and 35 are controllable so that the current output of each can be made to decrease gradually to effect more complete demagnetization.

The described apparatus can be used with magnetic fields within the column of say 12,000 gauss, but fields of 20,000 gauss can also be used; and the coils 6 and 13 can be superconductive to provide fields of 40,000 to 100,000 gauss and above for removing paramagnetic impurities, for example. Ferromagnetic impurities are removed or separated at the lower fields, but even ferromagnetics are removed more effectively at the higher fields.

The strands of the steel wool have been called fibers and filaments. in fact, commercial stainless steel wool fibers, as shown in FIGS. d and 5, are flat ribbonswith sharp, serrated edges having a thickness in the various grades about one-tenth the value of the typical predominant width dimensions given below:

Grade Width Very fine 0.002 inches Fine 0.004 inches Medium 0006 inches Coarse 0 inches field being gradually reduced from some predetermined value to zero. The demagnetizing-field can be applied using the same coil as applies the magnetizing field, as: is shown schematically in FIG. 1. In FIG. 6A the demagnetizing field is provided by a separate coil 27-energized by the AC source 35, the coil 27 being shown in FIG. 2 would inside the coil 6. It is pointed out at thisjuncture that the coils 6 and 27 and later discussed coils 28 and 29 can be interleaved and arranged in various configurations to provide the desired field values. Thus, in FIG. 2, the coils designated 6 and 27 can include, also, coils to perform functions of the coils 28 and 29discussed in the following paragraph. On the other hand, a single coil, as 6, in appropriate circumstances and proper switching, can be connected to perform the functions of the coils T6, 27, 23 and 29.

Work done in connection with separators employing the present invention has shown that complete demagnetization of the material 4 and collected components to allow flushing is not practically possible. Also, the magnetic components become secured at various regions in the material 4 in a manner that renders them difficult to dislodge. it is necessary, then, to furnish some means for vibrating the steel wool during the flushing cycle. A most effective vibration action can be supplied by the eddy current device now to be discussed. A

sinusoidally alternating magnetic held 40 is FIG. 468 having a skin depth that is greater than the cross dimensions of the stainless steel fibers is supplied by the: coil 23 which is energized by an AC current supply 36. The frequency of the cur- 7 rent supply 36 is typically in the lower sonic range. A square wave alternating magnetic field 41 having an amplitude that is, preferably, lower than the sinusoidal wave 40 but which is 1r/2 radians out of time phase therewith provides, in combination with the field represented by the sinusoid 40, a vibratory action far greater than might be furnished, for example, by a single eddy current field as might be provided by a current having a frequency in the upper sonic range (i.e. l8,00020,000 cycles) and connected to either of the 'coils 2.8 and 29 during the flushing cycle, although a singleeddy current field may be used in particular apparatus. The square wave is supplied by the coil 29 which is energized by an AC current source 43 to furnish a square wave 41 at the same frequency as the frequency of the sinusoidal wave 40; but, whereas the sinusoid is slow rising and in the low frequency used (i.e. in the lower sonic range) has a skin depth that is large compared to the characteristic dimensions of the fibers, the square wave is abruptly alternating or faster rising and has a skin depth that is less than the characteristic dimensions of the fibers. The slow rising field 4-0 acts as a pulsed background field, the fast rising field 41 being applied to furnish a rate of change that is maximal when the background field 40 is also maximal thereby effecting a maximum vibratory force upon the steel wool. in some instances, it may be expedient to mix a small amount of copper wool in with the steel wool, the higher conductivity of the copper wool acting to increase the intensity of vibration within the column 2.

The previously discussed apparatus is adapted to remove magnetizable components from a slurry, but is not adapted to remove nonmagnetic components. 'The lower schematic representation in FIG. 6A comprising a nonconductive tank 37 connected in series with the column 2 by a pipe 42 is adapted to remove conductive components whether magnetic or nonmagnetic. The slow rising pulse 40, as before, is

' furnished by a coil 38 which is energized by the current source 36; and the fast rising pulse 41 is furnished by a coil 39 which is energized by the current source 43. Conductive components 42 within the slurry are propelled to travel in the direction of the arrow designated A to pass from the tank 37 through an outlet 4 the usable slurry passes through an outlet 45. The force on any conductive particle 42' will be to the left or right depending on whether the wave 40 leads or lags the wave 41 in time and on the relative orientation of the coils 38 and 39. Un-v like devices with no background field or a continuous background field in which the time varying field must be asymmetric to provide a unidirection net force, the present device, though having symmetric fields, produces a unidirectional force. And the force is maximized because the instant at which the rate of change is maximal coincides with the instant at which the field is maximal. Thus, the induced eddy currents reach their maximum at a time when the magnetic field is maximum, which optimizes use of the potentially available force. The use of high intensity pulsed fields, since the background field is needed for only a brief instant of time, represents a substantial saving of power over a continuous background field. in addition, as explained before, the period or rise time of the varying field is systematically matched to the object to be acted on, in such a way as to achieve the proper skin depth or penetration depth of the induced eddy currents. The eddy current apparatus discussed here represents an improvement over the prior art in that it uses two separately controlled pulsed or periodically varying magnetic fields, one having a substantially fast rise-time to induce eddy currents of appropriate skin depth in the particular object or particle to be acted on, and the other having a substantially slow rise-time to allow a background field to penetrate into the object to be acted on. The fast rising pulse has a skin depth equal to or smaller than the characteristic dimensions of the object to be acted on in the direction of field penetration while the slow rising pulse has a skin depth substantially greater than the dimension of the object to be acted on in the direction of field penetration. The two pulsed or periodic magnetic fields are timed in such a way as to have an expedient time phase relationship with respect to each other, here shown to be 7172 radians, lead or lag so that the abrupt rise coincides with the maximum or minimum of the sine wave and an expedient spatial relationship to one another in order to produce maximum force in the desired direction.

The vibrating action can be provided by a single periodic Signal, as the sinusoid 40, in the high sonic (i.e., 18,000 to 20,000 cycles per second) or ultrasonic range. To be effective, the frequency of the magnetic signal must be high enough to provide a skin depth 4 that is equal to or smaller than the characteristic dimensions of the wool fibers in the direction of field penetration; the skin depth, as is known to workers in this art (see Radio Engineers Handbook, Terman, FirstEdition, McGraw-Hill Company, Inc., 1943, pages 34-35) being found in the following relationship:

where B,, is the intensity of the eddy-current inducing magskin depth is inversely proportional to the square root of conductivr y x of the material and the square root of the frequency f of the alternating magnetic field B,,:

V K f The attenuation of this field as it penetrates into the conducting material is caused by induced eddy currents, and it is the intended purpose of said alternating field to induce such eddy currents which will react to produce aforce to vibrate the material at the frequency of the eddy-current inducing field.


l. A magnetic separator for removing colloidal and subcolloidal ceramic magnetic components and paramagnetic components from a fluid carrier comprising, in combination, a substantial volume of ferromagnetic corrosion resistant wool material having a plurality of paths therethrough along which the carrier and components can travel to effect intimate contact between the carrier and said wool, a coil wound about the wool material and adapted to be connected to a source of electric current to produce a background field within the volume occupied by the wool material of an intensity of at least an average strength of 12,000 gauss, the 12,000 gauss field being substantially stronger than that required to magnetize the magnetic wool material to saturation throughout said volume and of sufiicient intensity substantially to magnetize ceramic magnetic components and paramagnetic components in the carrier such that said components are subjected simultaneously to the background field and a strong magnetic field gradient in the vicinity of the magnetic wool material, said background field and field gradient being sufficiently high in relation to the particle size of the components to attract and retain said components, a source of electric potential connected to energize the coil and adapted to be disconnected to allow flushing of the components from the wool material, and eddy-current means including a further source of electric potential connected to introduce an AC magnetic field having a skin depth that is less than the characteristic dimensions of the wool fibers in the direction of field penetration to provide vibratory action during the flushing, the frequency of the eddy-current field being at least in the upper sonic range of the order of 18,000 to 20,000 cycles per second and up.

2. A magnetic separator as claimed in claim 1 that includes a further coil wrapped about the wool material and in which the further source is an AC sourceof electric current connected to said further coil to produce upon energization the eddy current field.

3. A magnetic separator as claimed in claim 1 in which copper wool is mixed with the magnetic wool fibers to increase the intensity of vibration.

4. Apparatus as claimed in claim 1 in which a' plurality of perforated equipotential plates of magnetic-type stainless steel are disposed at axially separated regions in the wool material and within said coil to ensure uniform flow of the carrier through the wool material and uniform distribution of magnetic flux in the wool material.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2430157 *Jul 29, 1939Nov 4, 1947Byrd Jr WilliamMagnetic separator for removing finely divided magnetic material from liquids
US2786047 *Feb 11, 1952Mar 19, 1957Phillips Petroleum CoProcess for removing nickel catalyst from hydrogenated polybutadiene
US2954122 *Jun 17, 1957Sep 27, 1960Petroleum Res CorpMethod and apparatus for separating materials
US3150291 *Oct 2, 1962Sep 22, 1964Henry L LaquerIncremental electrical method and apparatus for energizing high current superconducting electromagnetis
US3177408 *Sep 18, 1961Apr 6, 1965Robert G MillsSuperconductor solenoid with overheat protective structure and circuitry
US3239725 *Dec 4, 1962Mar 8, 1966Ion Phvsics CorpSuperconducting device
US3279602 *Feb 18, 1963Oct 18, 1966Al IncMagnetic separation process and equipment therefor
US3394330 *Jan 16, 1967Jul 23, 1968Rca CorpSuperconductive magnet construction
GB801003A * Title not available
Non-Patent Citations
1 *Auslegeschrift 1012871, Werner, Oct. 14, 1952
2 *Diffusion of Eddy Currents; K. W. Atwood and H. L. Libby, A.E.C. Research and Development Report, Hanford Laboratories, Richland, Washington, December 1963 (Group 260-C1 324 Subclass 40)
3 *Superconducting Magnets, Hulm et al., p. 50, Int. Scl. and Tech. May, 1963
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3757948 *Mar 29, 1971Sep 11, 1973N BabushkinaFilter separator for wet enrichment of finely dispersed materials
US3838773 *Mar 16, 1973Oct 1, 1974Massachusetts Inst TechnologyVibrating-matrix magnetic separators
US3841486 *Dec 28, 1971Oct 15, 1974Siemens AgDevice for purifying the feed water of a steam power installation
US3873448 *May 9, 1973Mar 25, 1975Tenneco ChemMagnetic separator
US3902994 *May 16, 1973Sep 2, 1975Kelland David RHigh gradient type magnetic separator with continuously moving matrix
US3912634 *May 1, 1974Oct 14, 1975Eriez Mfg CoFilter cartridge for a magnetic separator
US3984309 *Sep 27, 1974Oct 5, 1976Allen James WMagnetic separator
US3985646 *Jul 25, 1975Oct 12, 1976J. M. Huber CorporationMethod for magnetic beneficiation of particle dispersions
US4005008 *Jul 25, 1975Jan 25, 1977J. M. Huber CorporationApparatus for magnetic beneficiation of particle dispersion
US4033864 *Jul 16, 1975Jul 5, 1977Sala Magnetics, Inc.Inlet and outlet apparatus for multiple matrix assembly for magnetic separator and modular matrix and matrix unit
US4046681 *Jul 10, 1975Sep 6, 1977Sala Magnetics, Inc.Multiple matrix assembly and matrix unit for magnetic separator with simplified sealing
US4054513 *Nov 17, 1975Oct 18, 1977English Clays Lovering Pochin & Company LimitedMagnetic separation, method and apparatus
US4078998 *May 6, 1975Mar 14, 1978Robin Roy OderMagnetic separator
US4079002 *Apr 15, 1976Mar 14, 1978Aquafine CorporationThin-section-matrix magnetic separation apparatus and method
US4087358 *Oct 12, 1976May 2, 1978J. M. Huber CorporationAugmenting and facilitating flushing in magnetic separation
US4110222 *Apr 12, 1976Aug 29, 1978English Clays Lovering Pochin & Company LimitedApparatus for separating magnetizable particles from a fluid
US4116829 *Mar 29, 1976Sep 26, 1978English Clays Lovering Pochin & Company LimitedMagnetic separation, method and apparatus
US4124503 *May 28, 1976Nov 7, 1978English Clays Lovering Pochin & Co. LimitedMagnetic separators, apparatus and method
US4129498 *Nov 24, 1975Dec 12, 1978English Clays Lovering Pochin & Co. LimitedMagnetic separation
US4142479 *Oct 5, 1976Mar 6, 1979Daidotokushuko KabushikikaishaMagnetic separators and apparatus for making the same
US4144163 *Jun 5, 1975Mar 13, 1979Sala Magnetics, Inc.Magnetodensity separation method and apparatus
US4147632 *Dec 19, 1977Apr 3, 1979J. M. Huber CorporationAugmenting and facilitating flushing in magnetic separation
US4157953 *Jan 28, 1977Jun 12, 1979Mawardi Osman KMagnetic separation of iron pyrite from coal
US4157954 *Oct 12, 1976Jun 12, 1979J. M. Huber CorporationMethod for improving production rates during benefication of particle dispersions
US4188296 *Jan 10, 1978Feb 12, 1980Etuo FujitaFuel combustion and magnetizing apparatus used therefor
US4190524 *Jul 21, 1975Feb 26, 1980English Clays Lovering Pochin & Co., Ltd.Magnetic separators
US4208278 *Feb 27, 1978Jun 17, 1980Stekly Zdenek J JSeparating chamber for magnetic separator
US4217213 *Aug 14, 1978Aug 12, 1980Siemens AktiengesellschaftDevice for the separation of minute magnetizable particles, method and apparatus
US4244822 *Aug 9, 1979Jan 13, 1981The Babcock & Wilcox CompanyIndustrial technique magnetic apparatus
US4247398 *Oct 29, 1979Jan 27, 1981Tdk Electronics Co., Ltd.High gradient magnetic separation apparatus
US4249994 *Feb 8, 1977Feb 10, 1981Commissariat A L'energie AtomiqueMethod for unclogging an electromagnetic filter and an installation for carrying out said method
US4261815 *Dec 31, 1979Apr 14, 1981Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologyMagnetic separator and method
US4265746 *Jul 30, 1979May 5, 1981Bon Aqua, Inc.Water treating apparatus and methods
US4265754 *Jun 6, 1980May 5, 1981Bon Aqua, Inc.Water treating apparatus and methods
US4265755 *Aug 23, 1979May 5, 1981Bon Aqua, Inc.Magnetic fluid treating unit
US4279748 *Mar 1, 1979Jul 21, 1981Inoue-Japax Research IncorporatedHigh-field gradient magnetic separator
US4294705 *May 31, 1979Oct 13, 1981Boliden AktiebolagMethod and an agent for chemical purification of water by means of chemical precipitation and magnetic sludge separation
US4299701 *Jan 25, 1980Nov 10, 1981DynaflexMagnetic fluid treating apparatus
US4304667 *Nov 30, 1979Dec 8, 1981FramatomeFilter for purifying a fluid containing ferromagnetic particles
US4306970 *Apr 4, 1980Dec 22, 1981Ishikawajima-Harima Jukogyo Kabushiki KaishaMagnetic particle separating device
US4352730 *Jan 26, 1981Oct 5, 1982Holec N.V.Method for cleaning a magnetic separator and magnetic separator
US4368387 *Apr 24, 1981Jan 11, 1983Magnesep CorporationMethod of separating isotopes
US4378252 *May 29, 1981Mar 29, 1983Bayer AktiengesellschaftMagnetic separation to improve purity of iron oxide pigments
US4432873 *Oct 9, 1981Feb 21, 1984Siemens AktiengesellschaftHigh gradient magnetic separation device
US4528096 *Jul 18, 1980Jul 9, 1985Siemens AktiengesellschaftDevice for high gradient magnetic separation
US4544482 *Dec 12, 1983Oct 1, 1985Siemens AktiengesellschaftApparatus for extracting magnetizable particles from a fluid medium
US4663029 *Apr 8, 1985May 5, 1987Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologyMethod and apparatus for continuous magnetic separation
US4664796 *Sep 16, 1985May 12, 1987Coulter Electronics, Inc.Flux diverting flow chamber for high gradient magnetic separation of particles from a liquid medium
US4668591 *Mar 11, 1985May 26, 1987Hitachi, Ltd.Magnetic separator matrix of cut pieces of an elongated crystalline magnetic alloy
US4769130 *May 25, 1983Sep 6, 1988A/S Niro AtomizerHigh-gradient magnetic separator
US4772383 *Aug 30, 1982Sep 20, 1988A/S Niro AtomizerHigh-gradient magnetic separator
US4874508 *Jan 19, 1988Oct 17, 1989Magnetics North, Inc.Magnetic separator
US5186827 *Mar 25, 1991Feb 16, 1993Immunicon CorporationApparatus for magnetic separation featuring external magnetic means
US5200084 *Sep 26, 1990Apr 6, 1993Immunicon CorporationApparatus and methods for magnetic separation
US5227683 *Feb 11, 1992Jul 13, 1993Colonel ClairMagnet assembly with concentrator for providing flux lines perpendicular to fluid flow direction within steel pipe
US5269915 *Apr 8, 1993Dec 14, 1993Colonel ClairMagnetic source and condenser for producing flux perpendicular to gas and liquid flow in ferrous and nonferrous pipes
US5466574 *Jan 15, 1993Nov 14, 1995Immunivest CorporationApparatus and methods for magnetic separation featuring external magnetic means
US5795470 *Jun 7, 1995Aug 18, 1998Immunivest CorporationMagnetic separation apparatus
US5876593 *Sep 15, 1997Mar 2, 1999Immunivest CorporationMagnetic immobilization and manipulation of biological entities
US5997812 *Aug 1, 1996Dec 7, 1999Coolant Treatment Systems, L.L.C.Methods and apparatus for the application of combined fields to disinfect fluids
US6013532 *Jun 19, 1997Jan 11, 2000Immunivest CorporationMethods for magnetic immobilization and manipulation of cells
US7056657Feb 6, 2002Jun 6, 2006Immunivest CorporationApparatus and methods for magnetic separation
US7681737Jun 8, 2004Mar 23, 2010Dow Corning CorporationMagnetic separator apparatus
US8268177Aug 13, 2008Sep 18, 2012Agency For Science, Technology And ResearchMicrofluidic separation system
US8627833May 20, 2009Jan 14, 2014Fronius International GmbhApparatus and method for cleaning welding torches
US20030146813 *Feb 5, 2003Aug 7, 2003Thomas HollyMagnet housing
DE2111986A1 *Mar 12, 1971Oct 21, 1971Huber Corp J MVorrichtung zur Erzielung einer hohen Sammelausbeute von in Schlamm enthaltenen magnetischen Teilchen
DE2501858A1 *Jan 17, 1975Jul 24, 1975English Clays Lovering PochinVerfahren und vorrichtung zum abscheiden magnetisierbarer teilchen, die in einer fluessigkeit suspendiert sind
DE2615580A1 *Apr 9, 1976Oct 21, 1976English Clays Lovering PochinVorrichtung zum trennen magnetisierbarer teilchen von einem stroemungsfaehigen medium
DE2628095A1 *Jun 23, 1976Jan 5, 1978Siemens AgMagnetische abscheidevorrichtung
DE2814463A1 *Apr 4, 1978Oct 12, 1978Tdk Electronics Co LtdGeraet zum abtrennen von feinen ferromagnetischen und/oder paramagnetischen teilchen
EP0032317A2 *Dec 30, 1980Jul 22, 1981A.P.V.-Carlson LimitedA method of liquid filtration
EP0236449A1 *Sep 9, 1986Sep 16, 1987Coulter ElectronicsApparatus for acoustically removing particles from a magnetic separation matrix.
WO1990010598A1 *Mar 7, 1989Sep 20, 1990George M ZimmermanAn improved magnetic-field amplifier
U.S. Classification210/222
International ClassificationG01N27/90, H01F7/20, B03C1/02, B03C1/24, G01N19/00, G01N19/04
Cooperative ClassificationG01N19/04, B03C1/24, H01F7/202, G01N27/90
European ClassificationG01N19/04, G01N27/90, H01F7/20B, B03C1/24