Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3574507 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateApr 13, 1971
Filing dateJul 31, 1969
Priority dateJul 31, 1969
Publication numberUS 3574507 A, US 3574507A, US-A-3574507, US3574507 A, US3574507A
InventorsKydd Paul H
Original AssigneeGen Electric
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Air/fuel mixing and flame-stabilizing device for fluid fuel burners
US 3574507 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

United States Patent Inventor Paul II. Kydd Scotia, N.Y.

July 31, 1969 Apr. 13, 1971 General Electric Company Appl. No. Filed Patented Assignee AIR/FUEL MIXING AND FLAME-STABILIZING DEVICE FOR FLUID FUEL BURNERS 5 Claims, 6 Drawing Figs.

US. Cl 431/350, 60/39.72, 263/19 Int. Cl F23d 13/24 Field of Search 60/39.72; 431/350; 263/19 (A) [56] References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,176,465 4/1965 Colley 60/39.72 3,269,115 8/1966 Nelson 60/39.72X 3,393,516 7/1968 Markowski 60/39.72X

Primary Examiner-Carroll B. Dority, Jr. Attorneys-Richard R. Brainard, Paul A. Frank, Charles T. Watts, Leo I. Ma Lossi, Frank L. Neuhauser, Oscar B.

Waddell and Joseph B. Forman ABSTRACT: Baffle means are located in the paths of fluid fuel streams issuing at high velocity from a plurality of jet orifices in an elongate burner pipe. These downstream baffles significantly laterally deflect the fuel streams and result in both the promotion of fuel/air mixing and the provision of low-velocity flame-stabilizing regions.

PATENTED APR 1 '3 I971 574-. 5

' sum 1 or z Fig.


b Jaw/a40- HI'S AIR/FUEL MIXING AND FLAME-STABILIZING DEVICE FOR FLUID FUEL BURNERS BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The use of fluid fuel burners broadly encompasses two types of application: (a) equipment in which the amount of air admitted to the combustion system is at most only slightly larger than that required to sustain combustion and (b) systems in which the flow of air admitted to the combustion system is considerably in excess of the amount required to sustain combustion and the object is to raise the temperature of the flow. Gas burners for firing industrial and domestic heating equipment is an example of the first type of application, while the burner for a fired exhaust heat-recovery steam generator (used in conjunction with a gas turbine) is an example of the second type of application.

This invention is primarily of interest for the latter type of application and, when the term air" is employed herein, both riormal air and oxygen-containing gas streams are encompassed.

The problems encountered with the latter type of burner application differ in many respects from those encountered in the former type. Examples of difficult, but desirable, conditions to achieve and maintain in the presence of grossly excessive airflows are: (a) operating with a short flame length (about l-2 feet) with jet orifices having diameters in excess of 0.050 inches; (b) providing acceptable fuel/air mixing; (c) operating with positive flame retention and stable combustion at air velocities from 1,500 to 6,000 f.p.m., and (d) adjusting to a wide range of fuel flows.

One example of prior-art solutions to the above problems is described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,05l,464, Yeo et al., wherein an array of spaced air jets is provided adjacent a gas supply means, the air jets having varying air-supplying capacity such that a greater or lesser portion of the air jet array contributes to the combustion depending upon the amount of gas supplied. The air jets are located in at least one mixing wall flanking the gas supply means, Flame retention is accomplished by the provision of shielded eddy pockets adjacent certain ports for the discharge of gaseous fuel, called ignitor ports, as distinguished from main gas ports. These eddy pockets are in part defined by projections, which extend into paths of the fuel gas streams leaving the ignitor ports, but not the main gas ports from which the gas streams flow unimpeded. As described in the Yeo et al. specification, it is necessary to supply various raw gas or gas/air mixtures to the burner to vary the stage of operation. For example, at high fire operation either raw gas or a rich gas/air mixture is supplied. For minimum and low rates of operation the burner ports are supplied with a combustible mixture of gas and air containing all or substantially all the air required for combustion. This requirement of premixing of fuel gas and air poses a distinct problem. It is inconvenient to mix fuel gas and external air for admission to a burner and fuel cannot be mixed with hot air sources, such as hot turbine exhaust air.

In contrast to the Yeo et al. mixture, which is used for fluid fuel-buming operations in the presence of great excesses of air, U.S. Pat. No. 3,037,553, Jackson, describes a gas burner for heating equipment specifically designed to operate without any excess flow of air and to provide for close proportioning of the air/gas mixture. Unaerated gas jet streams exiting at high velocity from the burner pipes strike a gas-impingement structure consisting of bars disposed within an air injection duct. This combined structure is provided to break up the gas jet streams and aerate the gas. The air injection duct permits the ejected gas to induce the proper airflow for combustion to pas therethrough and is apparently relied upon to provide a zone of relatively low-velocity flow for gas ignition and flame propagation. Although the gas jet streams are high-velocity flows, the airstream must not have any significant velocity, because of the construction disclosed. Therefore, there is no indication that the combination of gas-impingement and airinjection duct structures would function in the presence of high-velocity airflows. Further, this combined structure is not suitable for use in applications in which a wide range of fuel flows and fuel jet velocities are encountered.

What is needed in the art is a mechanically simple and rugged burner construction with a turndown ratio of at least 5:1 with which unaerated fluid fuel may be burned with a short, nonluminous flame with positive flame retention in the presence of great excesses of air having velocities ranging up to 6,000 f.p.m.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The instant invention solves the above-mentioned need and, in addition, enables the utilization of larger fuel jet orifices having diameters in the 0.050 inches-0.150 inches range, thereby increasing the capability of the burner to combust dirty" fuel, a major problem in the field. These objectives are attained by placing flame-holding baffle structures of significant lateral dimension downstream of the jet orifices to provide significant lateral deflection of each fluid fuel stream whereby the desired fuel/air mixing is achieved and a lowvelocity flame-stabilizing region is provided thereover for each flame. In addition, the lateral spread of the baffles into the airstream provides a more uniform flame temperature distribution.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING The exact nature of this invention as well as objects and advantages thereof will be readily apparent from consideration of the following specification relating to the annexed drawing in which:

FIG. I is a perspective view showing a single burner element with a pair of flame-holder wings affixed thereto representative of the prior art;

FIG. 2 is an elevational view of the preferred construction of the gas burner/flame-holder unit of the instant invention;

FIG. 3 is a sectional view taken on line 3-3 of FIG. 2;

FIG. 4 is a plan view of a modification of the prior-art gas burner device to embody the flame holders of the instant invention;

FIG. 5 is a sectional view taken on line 5-5 of FIG. 4; and

FIG. 6 is a sectional view through an array of the burners of FIGS. 2, 3 showing the flame profiles and low-velocity regions provided by the instant invention.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT A single prior-art burner/flame-holder unit 10 is shown in FIG. I, which in its simplest construction includes hollow cylindrical tube 11 closed at one end by cap 12 and open at the opposite end thereof for connection to a source (not shown) of fluid fuel, such as gas or vaporized oil. A typical mounting plate arrangement 13 is employed to mount the burner unit 10 so that it projects into a combustion chamber.

Jet orifices, or ports, I4 located at intervals along the length of fuel tube 11 admit fluid fuel into the trough-shaped mixing space 16 defined by diverging flame-holder webs 1'7, 18 provided with a plurality of apertures 19, 21, respectively, spaced longitudinally thereof. Apertures 19, 21 direct air from the passing stream into mixing volume 16 in distinct jets providing a multitude of small combustors distributed along the burner length.

It has been shown that by replacing the flame-holder wings l7, 18 of the prior-art burner 10 (FIG. I) with s single undulating metal strip 31 extending along fuel tube 32 (FIGS. 2 and 3) and welded (or otherwise attached) to the top of tube 32, a more effective burner unit is produced. The points of attachment 33 are located midway between fuel orifices 34 with flame-holder strip 31 arched over each orifice 34 as shown. This distance s and h may each vary from about 2 inches to about 6 inches. The width w of flame-holder strip 31 will range from about three-fourths inch to about 1%. inches and the orifice size may range from about 0.050-0.150 inches in diameter.

These relatively large orifice diameters facilitate the utilization of gaseous or vaporized fuels containing such impurities as particulate matter and substances, which would form soot in the fuel tubes 32, if not passed by the orifices. Ordinarily, such large orifice sizes must be avoided, because the discharged fuel is not adequately mixed with the air before it is burned. With the construction in H65. 2 and 3 each issuing stream of fuel is deflected as it impinges upon wavy flame-holder strip 31 being forced to move laterally a significant distance in order to pass beyond flame holder 31. In traversing this path the fuel becomes thoroughly mixed with the air streaming by tube 32 as may be seen in FIG. 6.

In addition to promoting mixing of the fuel with air, strips 31 provide low-velocitywake regions 36 along most of the upper surface thereof in which the flame can stabilize, while the lateral spread of the burning gas regions 37 results in a more uniform flame temperature distribution. The strips 31 must provide an imperforate transversely extending width of at least three-fourth inches in order to produce a large enough wake for flame stabilization.

The spacing center-to-center of fuel tubes 32 (FIG. 6) may range from about 9inches-l8 inches. Using such an arrangement the flames remain stabilized in the presence of airflows ranging as high as 6,000 f.p.s. to produce increases in air temperature as required ranging from 100 to as high as l,00O F. or even higher. There is, of course, no need to induce airflow and the cooling effect of the airflow minimizes oxidation of the flame-holder strips 31.

A second embodiment is shown in FIGS. 4 and 5 wherein the prior-art wing structures 41, 42 are relied upon, not as flame holders, but as supports for the transversely extending spaced baffle flame holders 43 arching over the fuel orifices 44 in fuel tube 46. In the construction shown, an added set of wing apertures 47, 48 is located in the space between adjacent flame holders 43, but the critical aspect of this invention is the juxtaposition of flame holders 43 and fuel orifices 44, whereby the emerging gaseous or vaporized fuel strikes the undersurface of the bafflelike flame holder and is deflected laterally to each side in order to continue on its way.

Low-velocity regions (not shown) occur over the upper surfaces of flame holders 43 in the same manner as is illustrated in FIG. 6 for the simpler preferred construction of FIGS. 2 and 3 and flame stabilization results in the same manner. The distance from orifice 44 t the underside of flame holder 43 may be lit inches-3 inches. With this distance set at the higher end of this range greater mixing between air and fuel can occur before impingement on the baffle 43. Conversely with this distance set at the lower end of this range, less air/fuel mixing can occur.

The burner construction of this invention may be disposed in the airstream with the fuel tube extending vertically, horizontally or at some other desired angle to the horizontal so long as the orifice side of the fuel tube faces downstream.

The invention has particular applicability to a heat-recovery steam generator used in conjunction with a gas turbine wherein a bank, or banks, of burners according to this invention are disposed in a stack or duct-receiving exhaust gases from the gas turbine. The purpose of the burner system, which must operate under a wide range of conditions, is to raise the temperature of the large flow of turbine exhaust air through a controlled temperature rise and provide a uniform temperature in the discharged airflow.

Although all baffles shown are rectangular in transverse section, they could be formed as V-shaped (or convex) in cross section so long as the point of the V-shape (or the convex surface) is placed upstream. The imperforate transverse dimension seen by the gas flow must, of course, remain at least about three-fourth inch in order to provide the minimum size wake for flame stabilization and to give the added benefit of lateral spreading of the hot gases.


1. In an apparatus for heating a gas stream by the combustion of fluid fuel wherein the gas stream su ports the combustion process and flows past the burner cons ruction at velocities of the order of 1,500 to 6,000 f.p.m., fluid fuel is emitted from the burner, mixes with the gas stream, is burned and thereby heats the gas stream, the improvement comprising:

a. a hollow elongate burner body;

b. a row of spaced fuel orifices extending along and penetrating the wall of said burner body on the downstream portion of said wall;

c. at least one baffle strip located downstream of said burner body, mounted spaced therefrom and supported thereby having as opposite major surfaces thereof:

1. an upstream imperforate laterally extending major surface area facing and in register with each of said orifices for laterally spreading all fluid fuel flow impinging thereon into the adjacent high-velocity airflow for passage around said baffle strip; and

2. a downstream laterally extending major surface area facing downstream from said orifices for maintaining thereon a physically unconfined low-velocity flamestabilizing region, said baffle strip extending substantial distances transversely to the direction in which fuel flow emanates from said burner body.

2. The improvement recited in claim 1 in which the baffle strip extends along the burner body in a wavy configuration and is connected directly thereto.

3. The improvement recited in claim 1 in which a separate baffle strip is mounted over each fuel orifice.

4. The improvement recited in claim 3 in which a plurality of baffle strips are connected to a pair of wing structures extending along and attached to the burner body, said wing structures having apertures therethrough for the passage of air.

5. The improvement recited in claim 1 in which the downstream major surface area is at least about three-fourth inch in least dimension.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3176465 *Aug 27, 1962Apr 6, 1965Gen ElectricVapor fuel injector flameholder
US3269115 *Apr 29, 1965Aug 30, 1966United Aircraft CorpJet engine afterburner continuous splash plate
US3393516 *Dec 5, 1966Jul 23, 1968United Aircraft CorpCurved exhaust deflector
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3830620 *Feb 22, 1972Aug 20, 1974Gen ElectricGas burner for heat-recovery steam generator
US4239482 *Apr 12, 1978Dec 16, 1980Durfee Edward PFuel burner with air-deflecting object and method therefor
US4493638 *Feb 12, 1982Jan 15, 1985The British Petroleum Company, P.L.C.Post-aerated burner for ground flare, and ground flare incorporating same
US4616994 *Oct 5, 1984Oct 14, 1986Heil-Quaker CorporationGas burner with means for reducing NOx emissions
US4651711 *Aug 14, 1985Mar 24, 1987Scheu Manufacturing CompanyForced air heater
US4652236 *Mar 10, 1986Mar 24, 1987Hans ViessmannAtmospheric gas burner assembly
US4737100 *Apr 30, 1986Apr 12, 1988John Zink CompanyDuct burner apparatus
US4904179 *Nov 21, 1986Feb 27, 1990Carrier CorporationLow NOx primary zone radiant screen device
US5715673 *Jun 25, 1996Feb 10, 1998Clean Energy Systems, Inc.Reduced pollution power generation system
US5956937 *May 29, 1997Sep 28, 1999Clean Energy Systems, Inc.Reduced pollution power generation system having multiple turbines and reheater
US6247316Mar 22, 2000Jun 19, 2001Clean Energy Systems, Inc.Clean air engines for transportation and other power applications
US6389814Dec 20, 2000May 21, 2002Clean Energy Systems, Inc.Hydrocarbon combustion power generation system with CO2 sequestration
US6523349Jun 19, 2001Feb 25, 2003Clean Energy Systems, Inc.Clean air engines for transportation and other power applications
US6598398May 21, 2002Jul 29, 2003Clean Energy Systems, Inc.Hydrocarbon combustion power generation system with CO2 sequestration
US6622470May 14, 2001Sep 23, 2003Clean Energy Systems, Inc.Semi-closed brayton cycle gas turbine power systems
US6637183May 14, 2001Oct 28, 2003Clean Energy Systems, Inc.Semi-closed brayton cycle gas turbine power systems
US6824710May 14, 2001Nov 30, 2004Clean Energy Systems, Inc.Working fluid compositions for use in semi-closed brayton cycle gas turbine power systems
US6868677May 24, 2002Mar 22, 2005Clean Energy Systems, Inc.Combined fuel cell and fuel combustion power generation systems
US6910335Aug 22, 2003Jun 28, 2005Clean Energy Systems, Inc.Semi-closed Brayton cycle gas turbine power systems
US6945029Nov 17, 2003Sep 20, 2005Clean Energy Systems, Inc.Low pollution power generation system with ion transfer membrane air separation
US7021063Mar 10, 2004Apr 4, 2006Clean Energy Systems, Inc.Reheat heat exchanger power generation systems
US7043920Jul 8, 2003May 16, 2006Clean Energy Systems, Inc.Hydrocarbon combustion power generation system with CO2 sequestration
US7882692Apr 30, 2007Feb 8, 2011Clean Energy Systems, Inc.Zero emissions closed rankine cycle power system
US8021145Jan 22, 2004Sep 20, 2011Neat Gas Burners LimitedGas burners
US20040003592 *Jul 8, 2003Jan 8, 2004Fermin ViteriHydrocarbon combustion power generation system with CO2 sequestration
US20040065088 *Aug 22, 2003Apr 8, 2004Fermin ViteriSemi-closed brayton cycle gas turbine power systems
US20040128975 *Nov 17, 2003Jul 8, 2004Fermin ViteriLow pollution power generation system with ion transfer membrane air separation
US20040221581 *Mar 10, 2004Nov 11, 2004Fermin ViteriReheat heat exchanger power generation systems
US20050126156 *Jan 31, 2005Jun 16, 2005Anderson Roger E.Coal and syngas fueled power generation systems featuring zero atmospheric emissions
US20050236602 *Nov 30, 2004Oct 27, 2005Fermin ViteriWorking fluid compositions for use in semi-closed Brayton cycle gas turbine power systems
US20050241311 *Apr 18, 2005Nov 3, 2005Pronske Keith LZero emissions closed rankine cycle power system
US20060194162 *Jan 22, 2004Aug 31, 2006Pompe Anthony L AGas burners
CN1742181BJan 22, 2004Jan 18, 2012卡利斯哈拉兰博斯Gas burners
DE2307102A1 *Feb 14, 1973Sep 6, 1973Gen ElectricGasbrenner fuer waermerueckgewinnungsdampfgenerator
EP0062402A2 *Feb 17, 1982Oct 13, 1982The British Petroleum Company p.l.c.Burner
EP0062402A3 *Feb 17, 1982Jan 26, 1983The British Petroleum Company P.L.C.Burner
EP0334736A1 *Mar 17, 1989Sep 27, 1989CHAFFOTEAUX & MAURYGas burners
U.S. Classification431/350, 432/222, 60/749
International ClassificationF23D14/00, F23D14/20
Cooperative ClassificationF23D14/20
European ClassificationF23D14/20