|Publication number||US3589193 A|
|Publication date||Jun 29, 1971|
|Filing date||Jul 24, 1969|
|Priority date||Jul 24, 1969|
|Publication number||US 3589193 A, US 3589193A, US-A-3589193, US3589193 A, US3589193A|
|Inventors||Thornton William E|
|Original Assignee||Thornton William E|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (6), Referenced by (36), Classifications (7)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
United States Patent 3.057192 lO/l962 Huffman etal.
Inventor William E. Thornton 513i Lancelot Drive, San Antonio, Tex. 78218 Appl No 844,417 Filed July 24, 1969 Patented June 29, 1971 ERGOMETER l0 Claims, 7 Drawing Figs.
US. Cl 73/379 R, 73/ l 33 int. Cl G0ll 5/02 Field of Search 73/l 33, 379; 272/73, 79
References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 3.092994 6/1963 Moller 73/134' 3,375,717 4/1968 lmpellizzeriertal 73/379 3,442,131 5/1969 Leyten .1 73 379 2,784,59l 3/1957 Shoor 73/379 FOREIGN PATENTS 475,603 7/1951 Canada 272/79 Primary Examiner-Charles A. Ruehl Anorney.lessup & Beecher ABSTRACT: An electrical ergometer capable of imposing measurable work loads on the users muscles for medical and/or physical therapy purposes. The ergometer includes a torque motor with a plurality of controllable feedback loops for causing the motor to develop different types of easily adjustable forces as it is driven by the user.
SHEET 1 [1F 3 Mam ERGOMIETIEIR BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION There is a wide variety of different types of such ergometers known to the art, the most common type being the externally powered tread mill, as well as units incorporating various types of weights, and the bicycle or pedal type of ergometer.
The usual prior art ergometer exhibits certain deficiencies. The most serious shortcoming is the fact that the forces presented to the muscles are not properly defined. It is known, for example, that the efliciency" of a muscle is directly related to the nature of the load imposed on it. For example, a large pure resistance force rapidly tires the muscle.
Since a frequent present day medical use of the ergometer is to achieve high physiological workloads for prolonged periods, it is essential that the ergometer be a type which may be operated for such prolonged period without excessively tiring the patient. A feature of the ergometer of the present invention is that it can be used without excessive tiring for prolonged periods, so as to improve the efiiciency of the cardiovascular system, a procedure known to the medical art as cardio-vascular conditioning.
It has been found that in order to maintain a relatively large workload on the patient for a prolonged period, as required, the muscles must be coupled to a load which will not tire them rapidly. The types and magnitudes of the forces applied to the muscles then become critical. It has also been found, in a manner analogous to mechanical engines, that the muscles require an inertial flywheel effect in some minimum ratio to other forces in order for them to function efiiciently.
Specifically, the electrical ergometer of the present invention is particularly advantageous in that the various forces may be applied separately to the muscles in any desired magnitude in order to study muscle action. In addition, improved controls and instrumentation may easily be provided in conjunction with the electrical ergometer of the present invention to create, sense, display and record, rapid changes in forces, powers and work, as will be described.
The type of forces that may be applied to the muscles of the user by the improved ergometer of the invention may include the following:
F is a first type of force X is the displacement K is a constant.
The first type of force F is exemplified by gravitational force or weight. In this case, X will be the vertical displacement of the weight above its resting position. It should be noted that the force F is always mixed with inertia in nature.
F,=M A (2) Where:
F is a second type of force M is a mass A is acceleration. The second type of force is inertial force and is rarely encountered in pure form, except in freely falling bodies.
F is a third type of force R is resistance V is velocity n is a power depending on the source.
The third force may be considered a family of forces depending upon the value of n. The value ofn may typically vary from F2 in viscous drag type of devices; through n=1 in some types of eddy-current brakes, to n= X in sliding friction after a starting transient.
F is a further type of force K is a constant X is a constant.
This latter force F, is a spring force and is rarely encountered in nature.
As mentioned previously herein, the improved ergometer of the invention is constructed so that a variety of different forces, such as those described above, may be exerted on the muscles of the user, each in a controlled manner, so that any desired force balance may be achieved. The actual mechanisms embodying the invention may be of the linear type, or may be of the pedal type, as mentioned above.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIGS. 1, 2, 3, 4A and 4B are schematic representations of instrumentalities by which the various types of forces described above may be exerted on the :muscles of the user;
FIG. 5 is an electrical diagram, in conjunction with certain elements, and illustrating appropriate feedback loops for a torque motor so as to achieve the different types of forces developed in the electrical ergometer of the present invention; and
FIG. 6 is a circuit by which the various analogs of force, velocity, displacement, power and work, for example, are produced for recording purposes.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATED EMBODIMENT As mentioned above, FIGS. l-3, 4A and 4B are schematic representations of elementary means for achieving the forces described above. For example, with respect to equation (I i.e., F,=K, this force may be achieved by constant force springs, such as the illustrated Negator spring assembly 10 in FIG. II.
An elastic flat and set spring 11 is wound on a reel 12, and the end of the spring is coupled to a second reel 14. The second reel is mounted on a shaft 16 with a pulley 18. Then, as a force F is applied to a belt 20, for example, wrapped around the pulley 18, the resulting rotation of the pulley causes the shaft 16 to rotate which, in turn, rotates the reel 14. When the reel 14 is rotated, it is resisted by the elastic set of the spring 111. The magnitude of the constant force F may be controlled by the spring size, or by varying the radii of the reels 12 and 14, and ofthc pulley 18.
The second force, as represented by F =M A in equation (2), is represented in FIG. 2 by a flywheel 30 which is mounted for rotation on a shaft 32, and which includes a pulley 34 on the shaft. Then, when the force F is applied to a belt 36 around the pulley, the rotation of the pulley causes the flywheel to rotate so as to obtain a torque which is equal to the moment of inertia of the flywheel l multiplied by its angular acceleration A simple mass supported on a low friction support could be used to achieve the force of equation (2), but it is simpler to use rotating masses, which may be mounted on ball or other low friction bearings, and subsequently translating the resulting torques into linear forces through a pulley and belt assembly, such as described above. The magnitude of the force F may be controlled by selecting the mass and configuration of the flywheel 30, by varying its mass distribution or by selecting different radii for the pulley 34, or even by using a gear arrangement.
The force F;, of equation (3) may be produced by the eddycurrent brake 40 illustrated in FIG. 3. This particular eddycurrent brake is a Faraday disc arrangement, and it comprises a highly electrically conductive disc 42 which is composed for example, of an appropriate nonmagnetic material, such as copper, aluminum or the like, and which is mounted for rotation within a U-shaped permanent magnet 44. The resulting force F =RXV" which, in this case is F,-,=RXV, may be conveniently developed b the assembly shown in FIG. 3.
As before, a pulley 46 is mounted on a shaft 48 with the disc 42, so that the torque may be converted to the linear force F by means of an appropriate strap 50 which is wrapped around the pulley.
The magnitude of the force F, may be adjusted by selecting the strength of the U-shaped permanent magnet 44, or by relative positioning of the poles, or by varying the gap between its poles. Also, the magnitude of the force is a function of the speed of the disc 42 and of its configuration.
. The force F,=K, X set forth in equation (4) may be.
generated by a simple linear spring 52 such as shown in FIG. 4A, or by a coiled spring 54, such as shown in FIG. 4B. In the latter instance, the coil spring 54 exerts an angular force on a shaft 56, and a pulley 58 is mounted on the shaft. A belt 60 is wrapped around the pulley, so that the force F, is developed as the belt is pulled so as to rotate the pulley 58 and the shaft 56. Magnitude of this latter force I" may be determined by the spring constants, or by the pulley ratio in FIG. 48.
Although, as mentioned-above, the mechanical ergometers described in the prior art are simple and reliable, and although they are self-contained units, they do not possess any high degree of flexibility insofar as the setting and adjustment of the various types of forces are concerned. For research purposes, for example, the electrical crgometer of the present invention, an embodiment of which is shown in FIGS. 5 and 6, has certain advantages.
For example, torque motors are rotary devices which have an output torque directly proportional to input current, with a sine wave response which is tlat to 8-10 seconds or less. Furthermore, torque motors have an appreciable torque at reasonable size and currents, and are capable of providing useful loads for crgometer purposes without the requirement for large gear ratios.
For that reason, the torque motor is used as a component of the embodiment of the electrical crgometer shown in FIG. 5. By means of appropriate feedback loops, as will be described, in a closed servo system, the various forces described above may be simulated. Also, the magnitude of the individual forces may be readily controlled electrically.
The electrical crgometer shown in FIG. 5, for example, includes a torque motor 10 which, for example, has a pulley 12 mounted on its drive shaft 14, the pulley being driven by a pedal assembly 16 which comprises a further pulley I8 coupled to the pulley 12 by means of a belt 20. The pulley 18 is rotated by pedals 22, the assembly 16 being mounted in an appropriate frame, as is the torque motor 10 and its pulley 12. The pulleys l2 and 18 may be toothed, and the belt 20 may be toothed for a more positive drive.
A linear tachometer goneratorfll) is mechanically coupled to the torque motor 10, and the tachometer develops a signal E which may be considered to be equal to the angular velocity of the torque motor t'u. The torque motor 10 is energized by a constant current generator 32 which provides a constant current through the torque motor 10 for a given feedback load, regardless of speed. The current generator 32 cnergizes the torque motor and causes it to tend to turn in one direction. When the user operates the pedals 20, he turns the torque motor In the opposite direction, causing the linear tachometer generator 30 to generate the signal E.
A voltage 5,, is applied to the the current generator 32, and this voltage is the sum of three separate voltages E,, E and E,,, the latter voltages being intended to represent the various forces described above. For example, the voltage E, is developed at the output of an operational amplifier 34, whose input is connected to a constant voltage source E,,.
The operational amplifier 34 is shunted by a potentiometer R,, and this potentiometer may be adjusted, so that the voltage E, has any desired constant value, with the operational amplifior 34 providing a low impedance source for the constant voltage. Also, the constant voltage E, may be set to any desired value, by an appropriate adjustment of the potentiometer R,. The voltage E, is the electrical analog of the force F, of equation (I) which is a constant force. Also, this force may have any desired value, as determined by the setting of the potentiometer R,.
The system of FIG. 5 also includes a multiple channel feedback loop. A first channel in the feedback loop includes an operational amplifier 36 which is shunted by a potentiometer R and which is connected directly to the output of the linear tachometer generator 30. The operational amplifier 36 produces the voltage E which is the electrical analog of the force F of equation(3). That is, the voltage E varies with the velocity'tb as represented by E applied to the input of the operational amplifier 36. Therefore, the electrical analog of the force F, is also applied to the input of the current generator 32.
The feedback loop includes a second channel incorporating a first operational amplifier 38 having its input coupled to the output of the generator 30 through a capacitor 40, and shunted by a resistor 42. The operational amplifier 38 produces a voltage E" at its output which, due to the differentiating action of the circuit element 40 and 42 is equal to da'i/dt which equals This latter voltage is translated by a second operational amplifier 44, the latter amplifier being shunted by a potentiometer R,,. The operational amplifier 44 develops a voltage E,, at its output, which is the electrical analog of the force F of equation (2). That is, the voltage E is proportional to the acceleration iii of the torque motor 10.
The constant current generator 32 is activated by the voltage E,,, which is the sum of the voltages E,, E and E,,. This latter generator, therefore, causes the torque motor to exhibit forces when the pedals 20 are operated, and which are of different types, as represented by the equations (2), (3) and (4) set forth previously herein. Also, merely by adjusting the potentiometers R,, R and R,,, the different types of forces may have any desired magnitude.
Specifically, the rate of rotation of the torque motor 10 is converted to an analog voltage E which is proportional to the angular velocity of the torque motor, and which becomes the signal which drives the inertia and resistance legs of the force generator. Specifically, the output torque T of the torque motor 10 is converted into a force R, which is related as follows:
The foregoing is analogous to:
The spring force of FIGS. 4A and 4B is not included in the electrical crgometer of FIG. 5 because that force is seldom used. However, it could be added if so desired. Also, the resistance force could be changed to a viscous resistance RV for example, by adding a multiplier for the voltage E,,. Since the potentiometers R,, R, and R,, may be easily adjusted to any selected value, the magnitudes of the various voltages E,, E and E,, may be readily controlled and varied.
To make full use of the electrical crgometer of FIG. 5, for example, a record should be made of the instantaneous forces, displacements, power and work performed by the user. In mechanical devices, such as those described in the prior art, these records may be obtained, for example, from a strain gauge, and if the forces are converted to linear motion, they may be obtained by a velocity pickup. In the electrical er gometer of FIG. 5, for example, the desired records may be obtained in a simplified manner, and by a simple network, such as shown in FIG. 6.
In the circuit of FIG. 6, only the elementary analog computation is required to yield the needed analogs of force, velocity, displacement, power and work, for recording purposes. The simplified versions for the pedal crgometer, such as shown in FIG. 5, for example, can use much simpler instruments since only averages are important. For example, a simple tachometer, and a Vceder Root counter may be used with a gauge to indicate the various loadings.
As shown in FIG. 6, for example, the pedal drive for the torque motor 10 may be replaced by a drum and a handle I02 which is coupled to the drum by a line 104 reeled about the drum. The motor then is driven by the user drawing the handle, with an appropriate ratchet arrangement being provided (not shown) so that reciprocally pulling the handle 102 causes the motor to achieve a certain speed with a particular loading, as established by setting the potentiometers R R and R in the circuit of FIG. 5. A strain gauge 106 is provided in the line 104, so that a voltage may be developed which is proportional to the force exerted. it will be appreciated, of course, that a similar arrangement may be provided in conjunction with the pedal assembly of FIG. 5, so that a similar voltage may be generated which is proportional to the voltage developed by the pedal assembly. The resulting voltage E, from the strain gauge 106 is amplified in an amplifier 108, so that a voltage E l is developed which is proportional to force. It will be appreciated, therefore, that a suitably calibrated instrument may be connected to the output terminal 110, and the instrument may designate force directly.
In addition, the output E from the tachometer generator 30, which is proportional to velocity rb may be applied to an output terminal 112, and an appropriately calibrated instrument, connected to the output terminal would provide a direct indication of velocity.
The voltage E which is proportional to velocity (b may be integrated in a network including an operationalamplifier 114, and an integrating network made up of a capacitor 116 at its input, and a shunting resistor 118, to provide an output voltage E". The latter voltage may be applied to an output terminal 120, and a suitable voltmeter, or recorder, connected to the output terminal 120 may be calibrated to provide a direct indication of acceleration.
Likewise, the voltage E may be applied to an operational amplifier 122 and associated differentiating network including a resistor 124 at the input to the differential amplifier, and a shunting capacitor 126, so that a voltage E V is produced. The latter voltage may be applied to an output terminal 128, so that an appropriately calibrated meter connected to the output terminal may provide a direct reading of displacement.
A multiplier circuit 130 of any known type may be connected into the circuit to receive the voltages E and E so as to produce a voltage E" representative of force multiplied by velocity which equals power. The latter voltage may be applied to an output terminal 132, so that the power developed may be directly indicated by an appropriate meter, or recorder, connected to that output terminal.
The voltage E" may be applied through a resistor 134 to an operational amplifier 136, the operational amplifier being shunted by a capacitor 138 to form an integrating network, so that a voltage E applied to an output terminal 140 is a direct indication of the work done, and this value may be directly indicated by a suitably calibrated voltmeter, or recorder, connected to the output terminal 140.
The electrical ergometer of the present invention, therefore, is most advantageous in that the desired forces may be simulated with any desired magnitude by a simple potentiometer adjustment. Moreover, the resulting voltages developed within the system itself may be used to provide appropriate instrumentation voltages, so that simple meters may be used to display on a direct basis, and by suitable calibrations, the various parameters described in FIG. 6.
What I claim is:
1. An electric ergometer for imposing measurable work loads on the muscles of a user, including: an electric motor having a drive shaft; circuit means for energizing said motor so as to cause said drive shaft to tend to rotate in a particular direction; manually operable means mechanically coupled to said drive shaft for rotating said drive shaft in the opposite direction; electric generating means coupled to said motor for generating an electric signal having a value related to the angular velocity of said drive shaft in said opposite direction; and electric feedback circuit means connected to said generating means and to said energizing circuit means for creating a force in said motor opposing such rotation in said opposite direction and which is a function ofsaid angular velocity.
2. The electric ergometer defined in claim 1, and in which said electric feedback circuit means includes a network for differentiating the signal from said electric generating means so as to create an additional force in said motor opposing such rotation in said opposite direction and which is a function of the angular acceleration of the drive shaft in said opposite direction.
3. The electric ergometer defined in claim 1 and which includes a network for introducing a constant signal to said energizing circuit means for creating a constant additional force in said motor opposing such rotation in said opposite direction.
4. The electric ergometer defined in claim 3 and which includes adjustable potentiometers in said last-named network and in said feedback circuit means for setting the aforesaid forces created in said motor to predetermined values.
5. The electric ergometer defined in claim 1 in which said manually operable means includes a rotatable pedal assembly.
6. The electric ergometer defined in claim 1 in which said manually operable means includes a linearly movable assembly.
7. The electric ergometer defined in claim 1 in which said manually operable means includes means developing an electric signal representative of the force exerted on said manually operable means; and circuitry coupled to said last-named means for developing an electric instrumentation signal indicative of said force.
8. The combination defined in claim 7 in which said circuitry includes a network coupled to said electric generating means for developing further instrumentation signals indicative of the work performed by the user.
9. The electric ergometer defined in claim 1 and which includes circuitry coupled to said electric generating means for developing instrumentation signals representative of the an gular velocity of said drive shaft.
10. The combination defined in claim 9 in which said lastnamed circuitry further develops an instrumentation signal representative of the angular acceleration of said drive shaft.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2784591 *||Jul 25, 1955||Mar 12, 1957||Shoor Bernard A||Cycle ergometer|
|US3057192 *||Sep 21, 1959||Oct 9, 1962||Union Oil Co||Chassis dynamometer|
|US3092994 *||Jul 13, 1959||Jun 11, 1963||Moller Waldemar||Device for the electric measurement of rotary moments|
|US3375717 *||Jun 29, 1965||Apr 2, 1968||Exercycle Corp||Exercising measuring system|
|US3442131 *||Jun 21, 1966||May 6, 1969||Mynhardt C V Geb||Ergometer|
|CA475603A *||Jul 31, 1951||Noel Ouellette||Exercising apparatus|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3745990 *||Oct 26, 1970||Jul 17, 1973||H Neis||Human motor coordination measuring apparatus|
|US3765245 *||Dec 31, 1970||Oct 16, 1973||Jaeger E||Dynamo ergometer|
|US3845756 *||Jun 28, 1972||Nov 5, 1974||Siemens Ag||Ergometer device|
|US4060239 *||Sep 9, 1976||Nov 29, 1977||Keiper Trainingsysteme Gmbh & Co.||Ergometer with automatic load control system|
|US4082267 *||May 12, 1976||Apr 4, 1978||Flavell Evan R||Bilateral isokinetic exerciser|
|US4358105 *||Aug 21, 1980||Nov 9, 1982||Lifecycle, Inc.||Programmed exerciser apparatus and method|
|US4972711 *||Feb 26, 1988||Nov 27, 1990||Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment Co.||Isometric lifting device|
|US5151071 *||Oct 5, 1990||Sep 29, 1992||Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment Co.||Isoinertial lifting device|
|US5256117 *||Oct 10, 1990||Oct 26, 1993||Stairmaster Sports Medical Products, Inc.||Stairclimbing and upper body, exercise apparatus|
|US5358461 *||Aug 16, 1993||Oct 25, 1994||Bailey Jr Russell M||Exerciser activated body-mounted lights and generators|
|US5499959 *||Mar 31, 1992||Mar 19, 1996||Stairmaster Sports/Medical Products, Inc.||Upper body exercise apparatus|
|US5540639 *||Sep 21, 1993||Jul 30, 1996||Stairmaster Sports/Medical Products, Inc.||Device to prevent arcuate motion of a user assist platform for an upper body exercise apparatus|
|US5656001 *||Feb 14, 1996||Aug 12, 1997||Racer-Mate, Inc.||Eddy current trainer for bicycles or other exercise equipment|
|US5785631 *||Oct 31, 1994||Jul 28, 1998||W.A.Y.S.S. Inc.||Exercise device|
|US5919115 *||Oct 28, 1994||Jul 6, 1999||The Regents Of Theuniversity Of California||Adaptive exercise machine|
|US6104096 *||Feb 1, 1999||Aug 15, 2000||Pedalite Limited||Electricity generation for pedalled vehicles|
|US6942603 *||Sep 24, 2002||Sep 13, 2005||Tonic Fitness Technology, Inc.||Control system of resisting and assisting force for a rehabilitation apparatus|
|US7066292 *||Jul 22, 2002||Jun 27, 2006||Shirouma Saiensu Kabushiki Kaisha||Pedalling power generation health machine|
|US7585251||Nov 30, 2004||Sep 8, 2009||Unisen Inc.||Load variance system and method for exercise machine|
|US7648446||Jun 8, 2005||Jan 19, 2010||Unisen, Inc.||System and method for electronically controlling resistance of an exercise machine|
|US7833135||Jun 27, 2008||Nov 16, 2010||Scott B. Radow||Stationary exercise equipment|
|US7862476 *||Dec 22, 2006||Jan 4, 2011||Scott B. Radow||Exercise device|
|US7976434 *||Dec 21, 2010||Jul 12, 2011||Scott B. Radow||Exercise device|
|US8647240||Oct 8, 2010||Feb 11, 2014||Innovative Applications, Inc.||Exercise device|
|US8939871 *||Feb 21, 2012||Jan 27, 2015||Bion, Inc.||Acceleration mechanism for exercise equipment|
|US20050001403 *||Jul 22, 2002||Jan 6, 2005||Yoshimasa Tahara||Pedalling power generation health machine|
|US20060046905 *||Nov 30, 2004||Mar 2, 2006||Doody James M Jr||Load variance system and method for exercise machine|
|US20060189452 *||Feb 23, 2005||Aug 24, 2006||Ming-Fu Chou||Magnetic resistance device for upright bikes|
|US20070149364 *||Dec 22, 2006||Jun 28, 2007||Blau David A||Exercise device|
|US20090011907 *||Jun 27, 2008||Jan 8, 2009||Radow Scott B||Stationary Exercise Equipment|
|US20090111658 *||Nov 20, 2007||Apr 30, 2009||Chih-Chen Juan||Loading apparatus for exercise machine|
|US20100113223 *||Jan 12, 2010||May 6, 2010||Unisen, Inc., Dba Star Trac||Methods for simulating resistance of road-going bicycle|
|US20110118086 *||Dec 21, 2010||May 19, 2011||Mr. Scott B. Radow||Exercise device|
|US20120217758 *||Feb 21, 2012||Aug 30, 2012||Bion Inc.||Acceleration mechanism for exercise equipment|
|US20160059069 *||Sep 3, 2014||Mar 3, 2016||Bojan R. Jeremic||Electronically controlled mechanical resistance device for rowing machines|
|USRE34959 *||Nov 8, 1991||May 30, 1995||Stairmaster Sports/Medical Products, Inc.||Stair-climbing exercise apparatus|
|U.S. Classification||482/2, 482/57, 73/862.18, 73/379.7|