Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3593789 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateJul 20, 1971
Filing dateOct 18, 1968
Priority dateOct 18, 1968
Publication numberUS 3593789 A, US 3593789A, US-A-3593789, US3593789 A, US3593789A
InventorsPrats Michael
Original AssigneeShell Oil Co
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Method for producing shale oil from an oil shale formation
US 3593789 A
Abstract  available in
Images(3)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

United States Patent [72] Inventor Michael Prats Houston, Tex. [21] Appl. No. 768,666 [22] Filed Oct. 13, I968 [45] Patented July 20, 1971 [73] Assignce Shell Oil Company New York, N.Y.

[54] METHOD FOR PRODUCING SHALE OIL FROM AN OIL SHALE FORMATION 11 Claims, 6 Drawing Figs.

[52] US. Cl 166/259, 166/247, 166/257, 166/261, 166/309 [51] Int. Cl ..E21b 43/24, E2 lb 43/26 [50] Field of Search 166/247, 256, 257, 259. 261, 272, 271, 309, 302, 299

[56] References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,780,449 2/1957 Fisher et al. 166/259 3.113.620 12/1963 Hemminger 166/247 X 3,342,257 9/1967 Jacobs et a1. 166/247 3,460,620 8/1969 Parker t 166/257 3,465,819 9/1969 Dixon 166/247 Primary ExaminerStephen .I. Novosad Attorneys-Louis .l. Bovasso and .l. H. McCarthy thereof. The zone is filled with a layer of granular material for permeability adjustment and a controlled combustion front is initiated by injecting a fluid comprising a mixture of oxygencontaining gas and aqueous liquid substantially near the top of the granular-filled fragmented zone so as to advance a combustion front down the zone and produce oil shale pyrolysis products.

PATENTEDJULZOIH?! 3593.789

saw 1 or 3 K A. \\A

l NVENTOR'.

M PRATS HIS ATTORNEY PMENTED JULZOIBT! 3,593,789 sum 2 [1F 3 GAS 29 26 S EPA RATOR [HEAT EXCHANGERT hiEATER I INVENTORZ M. PRATS HIS ATTORNEY PATENTEU JUL20 I971 SHEET 3 BF 3 SEPARATOR F I INVENTOR:

M. PRATS e. Merl A4 ms ATYTORNEY METHOD IFOR PRODUCING SHALE OIL FROM AN OIL SHALE FORMATION BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention This invention relates to an improved in situ combustion method of producing shale oil from a subterranean oil shale ormation by normalizing the permeabilities of the flow paths between the rubblized shale fragments in the fragmented formation under controlled combustion temperature conditions.

2. Description of the Prior Art The use of contained nuclear explosions has been proposed in subterranean oil shale formations in an attempt to break up the oil shale formation so that shale oil can be recovered from the rubbled zone by known techniques, such as in situ retortmg.

Experience has shown that when a relatively high-energy device, such as a nuclear bomb, is exploded within a subterranean earth formation, an almost spherical cavity filled with hot gases is formed. This cavity expands until the pressure within the cavity equals that of the overburden. On cooling, the roof of the cavity collapses since, generally, it cannot support itself, and a so-called chimney develops. Chimney growth ceases when the rock pile substantially fills the cavity, or, stable arch develops. In both cases, a substantially void space is formed below the overburden and above the rubble contained within the chimney. Surrounding the chimney isa fractured zone which results from the shock of the nuclear ex plosion.

A zone or chimney of fragmented oil shale resembles an oil reservoir in the sense that each is a permeable formation that contains combustible organic material. A combustion front can be advanced through such a formation by injecting an ox ygen-containing fluid such as air. The fragmented oil shale differs from an oil reservoir in having no matrix permeability and having relatively high, and widely varying, permeabilities in the channels that are formed by the interstices between the rock fragments.

In an oil reservoir in which the rock matrix is permeable, an efficient production of oil can often be attained by a dry, forward combustion process in which the combustion-supporting fluid is a gas such as air, and the combustion front is advanced in the direction of the air flow. The combustion generates hot combustion products that heat the oil, reduce its viscosity and displace most of it ahead of the combustion front. In some oil reservoirs, some advantage is provided by injecting a combustion-supporting fluid that contains an aqueous liquid; but such a use of an aqueous liquid is not essential, and it is avoided wherever its use involved problems such as gravity layover of the combustion front, damage to the reservoir formation, etc.

A subsurface detonation of a relatively high-energy explosive device, such as a nuclear bomb, is a desirable method of forming a vertically extensive zone of fragmented oil shale or rubble within a subterranean oil shale formation. As discussed hereinable, the underground nuclear detonation tends to form a chimney of rubble, i.e., a vertically extensive cylindrically shaped zone having a void space at the top. It has been suggested, as for example, in a U.S. Pat. to Hemminger, No. 3,1 13,620, to produce shale oil from a chimney of rubble by igniting the hydrocarbons at the top of the fragmented zone and injecting a combustion-supporting fluid near the top of the fragmented zone and advancing a combustion front down through the zone while producing oil shale pyrolysis products from near the bottom of the zone. In such a combustion process, in comparison with a combustion drive in an oil reservoir, the proportion of organic material remaining in the combustion zone is greater than in an oil reservoir while the heat capacity of the rocks in the zone is smaller. The presence of the greater proportion of organic material increases the proportion of combustion-supporting fluid that tends to be consumed in generating unnecessary heat. As soon as a portion of oil shale has been pyrolyzed, any additional heating of the residue is unnecessary. The proportion of organic material that is left by the pyrolysis of an oil shale is more than is needed to provide the heat used in pyroilyzing the oil shale.

ln advancing an underground combustion front, the genera tion of unnecessary heat may be avoided by incorporating aqueous liquid in the combustion-supporting fluid. The aqueous liquid reduces the temperature and rate of fuel consumption in the combustion zone. Because of the relatively low heat capacity in a fragmented oil shale, the water-to-air rates of such a combustion-supporting fluid is relatively critical and amount to about three-fourths as much as required for a viscous oil reservoir.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is an object of this invention to provide an improved method for producing shale oil by underground combustion retorting of fragmented oil shale under controlled in situ combustion conditions.

It is a further object of this invention to normalize the effective permeabilities of the interstices between the oil shale fragments within a fragmented zone so as to increase the sweep efficiency of the recovery process.

These objects are carried out by igniting the hydrocarbons present at the top of a chimney or fragmented zone of rubble formed within an oil shale formation. A combustion-supporting fluid comprising a mixture of oxygen-containing gas and aqueous liquid is injected substantially near the top of the fragmented zone thereby advancing a combustion front down the zone. Oil shale pyrolysis products are produced from substantially the bottom of the fragmented zone. A layer of granular material is deposited substantially across an upper portion of the fragmented zone at a location between the depths at which the combustion-supporting fluid is injected and oil shale pyrolysis products are produced. The permeability of the layer is adjusted to a permeability that is substantially uniform across the top of the fragmented zone and is significantly less than the average permeability of the fragmented zone. The combustion front is advanced by injecting the combustion supporting fluid while distributing the aqueous liquid of the mixture substantially across the top of the layer of granular material. Shale oil is then recovered from the oil shale pyrolysis products.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING FIG. I is a vertical cross-sectional view of an oil shale formation prior to detonating a relatively high-energy explosive device within the formation;

FIG. 2 is a vertical cross-sectional view of the oil shale formation of FIG. I after the explosive device has been detonated;

FIG. 3 is a vertical cross-sectional view of the final rubble zone created by detonating the explosive device of FIG. 1;

FIG. 4 is a vertical sectional view of the rubble zone of FIG.

FIG. 5 is a vertical sectional view of an oil recovery process applied to the oil shale formation of FIG. 1; and

FIG. 6 is a vertical sectional view of an alternate oil recovery process applied to the oil shale formation of FIG. 1.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS FIG. 1 shows a subterranean oil shale formation 111 having a relatively high-energy explosive device 12 located within the formation Ill. The device 12 may be either nuclear or nonnuclear; if a nuclear device is detonated within the oil shale formation 11, a strong shock wave from the nuclear device begins to move radially outwardly, vaporizing, melting, crushing, cracking and displacing the oil shale formation 11. After the shock wave has passed, the high-pressure vaporized material expands, and a generally spherical cavity 14 (FIG. 2) is formed which continues to grow until the internal pressure is balanced by lithostatic pressure. The cavity 14 persists for a variable time depending on the composition of the oil shale formation 11. The cavity roof 20 then collapses to form a chimney 15 (FIG. 3). Collapse progresses upwardly until the volume initially in cavity 14 is distributed between the fragments of the oil shale of formation 11. The size of the substantially cylindrical rubble zone, i.c., chimney 15 formed by the collapse of the cavity 14, may be estimated from the fact that the initial cavity 14 (FIG. 2) expands until the pressure within the cavity is about equal to the lithostatic pressure.

A zone of permeability 17 within and around the fragmented oil shale formation is formed surrounding the chimney 15 as can be seen in FIG. 3. lfdesired, the permeability of the zone 17 may be increased by surrounding the primary explosive device of FIG. 1 which forms the central cavity with a plurality of devices of lesser explosive energy, subsequently detonated in the manner disclosed in a copending application to Closmann et al., Ser. No. 653,l 39, filed July l3, I967.

A substantially void space 18 is formed at the top of the chimney of rubble 15. When used throughout this specification, the terms fragmented zone" and fragmented zone of rubble refer to the chimney 15 or any other rubbled or fracture-permeated zone formed by the explosion of a relatively high-energy explosive device. In order to normalize the effective permeabilities of chimney 15 in accordance with the teachings of my invention, a layer 22 of granular material (FIG. 4) is deposited across an upper portion of the chimney 15 at a depth between those at which fluids are to be injected and produced from chimney 15 as will be discussed further hereinbelow. This may be accomplished by extending a well 13 into communication with the void space 18 at the top of chimney l and injecting the granular material from an external source (not shown) through well 13 and across, for example, the upper portion of the rubble within chimney 15. The permeability of the layer 22 of granular material is adjusted to one that is uniform across the chimney and is low relative to the average permeability within the chimney 15 in a manner to be discussed further hereinbelow.

Referring now to FIG. 5, a preferred arrangement for producing shale oil from the fragmented zone of FIG. 4, is illustrated. A well 19 is extended to the bottom of the chimney 15 thereby establishing communication with the rubble zone. Well 19 is preferably drilled into the bottom of the rubble 15a within chimney 15 while the rubbled zone is hot, or at least warm, from the aforementioned explosion. Well 19 may be cased at least along the portion traversing the overburden l6 and the formation 11, as at well casing 20, with casing 20 ccmented therein as is well known in the art. Well 19 is equipped with a tubing string 27. A combustion supporting fluid is injected through the annulus formed between tubing string 27 and casing 20 above packer 24 and through openings 25 formed in well 19. The openings 25 may be formed by perforating means well known in the art, as for example, a bullet or jet-type perforator. The fluid then passes into the void space of the upper portion of chimney l5 and down through the layer 22 and into therubble 15a.

The combustion-supporting fluid comprises a mixture of combustion-supporting gas, such as air or oxygen, and aqueous liquid, such as water, and is injected in a manner that distributes the liquid substantially uniformly across the top of the layer 22. Such a distribution of the aqueous liquid may be accomplished by mechanical means well known in the art, such as by fixed or rotating deflectors or jets (not shown) which disperse the water and air mixture, for example, over the surface of the granular layer 22. The injection of air mixed with water that is mechanically distributed throughout the areal extent of the void space 18 within chimney 15 limits the combustion temperature and oxygen consumption of the combustion front. Because of the relatively high proportion of organic fuel that may remain in chimney 15 after the organic components have been pyrolyzed, the injected air must be mixed with enough water to limit the amount of oxygen consumption.

Alternatively, water and air, again for example, may be injected over layer 22 in the form ofa foam. For example, such a foam may be preferably formed by dispersing about 0.2 percent by weight of a foaming agent in water and dispersing the air in the aqueous phase in a proportion of about 2 cubic feet of aqueous phase per 1000 standard cubic feet of air.

A suitable foaming agent is Adofoam," a liquid mixture of anionic surface-active agents, manufactured by Conoco Petrochemicals of Houston, Texas. Nonionic surfactants and mixtures of anionic-nonionic surfactants may also be used.

As the combustion front advances down the chimney 15, oil shale pyrolysis products are recovered at the bottom of well 19. These products pass up through tubing string 27 where the shale oil and gas entrained in the recovered products passes through a heat exchanger 28 and into a separator 29. At this point, the shale oil and gas components are separated as is well known in the art. The recovered combustion-supporting gas may be recirculated from separator 29 through pump 26 and heater 31 as is also well known in the art.

Referring now to FIG. 6, wherein like numerals refer to like parts of FIG. 5, an alternate process for recovering shale oil from chimney 15 is shown. In place of the same well being opened into both the void space 18 and the bottom of chimney IS, a well 30, independent of well 19, is opened into the lower end or bottom of chimney 15. Thus, the circulating combustion-supporting gas is injected through tubing string 27 and onto the granular layer 22 disposed across the upper portion of the rubble 15a within chimney 15. As the combustion front moves downwardly in the manner discussed hereinabove, oil shale pyrolysis products are recovered up well 30 at its lower and adjacent the bottom of rubble 15a. Again, conventional equipment and techniques, such as heater 31, pump 26, separator 29 and heat exchanger 28, may be used for pressurizing, heating, injecting, producing and separating componcnts of the oil shale-pyrolysis products circulating out of the chimney 15.

In a rubble-filled nuclear chimney such as chimney 15, the interstices between the fragments of oil shale have widely different effective permeabilities. A fluid-filled void, such as void space 18, usually exists above the rubble l5 and tends to create an essentially constant pressure differential between any portion of the upper part of the fragmented zone (i.e., the chimney of rubble) and the point at which fluid is withdrawn from near the bottom of the chimney. Fluid injected into the upper portion and withdrawn from near the bottom of the chimney tends to finger through the fragmented oil shale by flowing rapidly through some portions and bypassing others. Such an injection of combustion-supporting fluid causes a combustion front to advance rapidly along some highly permeable channels and bypass other less permeable portions of the fragmented zone. During such a nonuniform advance, conductively transported heat causes the pyrolysis of the oil shale in the bypassed portions, but the pyrolysis products are burned as they flow into zones in which combustion is occurring. This results in an inefficient process that tends to consume much air and organic material while producing relatively little shale oil. The permeability-reducing granular layer 22, deposited at the top of rubble 15a as disclosed hereinabove, materially reduces such fingering or bypassing tendencies. For example, where the interstices within the rubble 15a have relative permeabilities that range from one to 100, the relative velocities of the flows within the interstices tend to cover a similar range. If the permeability-reducing granular layer 22 has a uniform relatively low permeability, the variations between the flow velocities are relatively small; for example, if the granular layer 22 has a permeability of 10, it reduces the range of the relative permeability from one to 10. In general, a granular layer that causes at least a fivefold reduction in the permeability of the fragmented zone limits the velocity variation to less than about 20 percent and provides a significant improvement in the efficiency of the shale oil production.

The granular layer 22 may be deposited within chimney 15 by gravel-packing techniques known to those skilled in the art .the gravel packing. The extent to which the permeability is reduced by a particular granular layer may be determined by determining the pressure drop between the points at which fluid is injected and produced.

If desired, the volume of the permeable zone may be increased'by opening and/or enlarging perforations or fractures into the oil shale in and around the fractured zone 17 surrounding the void space 18 and circulating fluid between the void space 18 and the rubble a resulting from the detonation including flow through a flow path enelusive of such openings prior to injecting the combustion-supporting fluid. The tendency for the inflowing fluid to flow laterally outward into such openings before or during a downward flow through rubble 15a toward the location from which the outflowing fluid is produced in enhanced by the flow resistance imparted by layer 22. a

I claim as my invention: 1. In a method for producing shale oil from a subterranean oil shale formation comprising the steps of:

placing a relatively high-energy explosive device within the formation; exploding the relatively high-energy explosive device within the formation thereby forming a cavity within the formation having a roof beneath the overburden which subsequently collapses to form a fragmented zone of rubble within the oil shale formation and extends fractures through the oil shale formation, the fragmented zone having a substantially void space formed adjacent the top thereof; depositing a layer of granular material of a preselected granular size substantially across an upper portion of said fragmented zone at a location between the depths at which a combustion-supporting fluid is to be injected and oil shale pyrolysisproducts are to be produced; and adjusting the permeability of said layer to a permeability that is substantially uniform across the top of the fragmented zone and is significantly less than the average permeability of said fragmented zone. 2. The method of claim 1 including the steps of: igniting the hydrocarbons present in the formation adjacent the top of said fragmented zone; injecting a combustion-supporting fluid comprising a mixture of oxygen-containing gas and aqueous liquid substantially near the top of said fragmented zone thereby advancing a combustion front down said fragmented zone from the top to the bottom thereof;

combustion-supporting fluid includes injecting air mixed with sufficient water to limit the amount of oxygen of said combustion front.

5. The method of claim 2 wherein the step of injecting a combustion-supporting fluid includes injecting said mixture in the form of a foam comprising 02 percent by weight of a foaming agent in the water and the oxygen-containing gas is dispersed in the aqueous phase in a proportion of approximately 2 cubic feet of aqueous phase per [000 standard cubic feet of air.

6. The method of claim 1 including the step of repeating the step of depositing said layer prior to producing said oil shale pyrolysis products.

I 7. The method of claim 1 including the step of repeating the step of depositing said layer while producing said oil shale pyrolysis products.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of depositing said layer includes depositing granular materials graded into a sequence ranging from coarse to fine in moving upwardly through said layer.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of depositing said layer includes depositing said layer prior to igniting said hydrocarbons.

10. The method of claim 1 including the step of extending at least one well through said formation and into communication with both said void space and substantially the bottom of said fragmented zone;

packing off the communication in said well formed between said void space and the bottom of said-fragmented zone; and subsequently injecting said combustion-supporting fluid down said well and through said layer and producing said oil shale pyrolysis products from the bottom of said fragmented zone up said well. 11. The method of claim 1 including the step of extending at least a first well through said formation and into communication with said void space and subsequently injecting said combustion-supporting fluid down said first well and through said layer; and

extending at least a second well through said formation and into communication with the bottom of said fragmented zone and subsequently producing said oil shale pyrolysis products from the bottom of said fragmented zone and up said well.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2780449 *Dec 26, 1952Feb 5, 1957Sinclair Oil & Gas CoThermal process for in-situ decomposition of oil shale
US3113620 *Jul 6, 1959Dec 10, 1963Exxon Research Engineering CoProcess for producing viscous oil
US3342257 *Dec 30, 1963Sep 19, 1967Standard Oil CoIn situ retorting of oil shale using nuclear energy
US3460620 *Jun 12, 1967Aug 12, 1969Phillips Petroleum CoRecovering oil from nuclear chimneys in oil-yielding solids
US3465819 *Feb 13, 1967Sep 9, 1969American Oil Shale CorpUse of nuclear detonations in producing hydrocarbons from an underground formation
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3951456 *Jan 3, 1975Apr 20, 1976Occidental Petroleum CorporationProcess for effecting even retort working fluid flow throughout an in situ retort containing carbonaceous deposits
US4036299 *Sep 22, 1975Jul 19, 1977Occidental Oil Shale, Inc.Enriching off gas from oil shale retort
US4045085 *Apr 14, 1975Aug 30, 1977Occidental Oil Shale, Inc.Fracturing of pillars for enhancing recovery of oil from in situ oil shale retort
US4089375 *May 13, 1977May 16, 1978Occidental Oil Shale, Inc.In situ retorting with water vaporized in situ
US4121662 *Jun 3, 1977Oct 24, 1978Kilburn James SWater purification with fragmented oil shale
US4148359 *Jan 30, 1978Apr 10, 1979Shell Oil CompanyPressure-balanced oil recovery process for water productive oil shale
US4266826 *May 24, 1976May 12, 1981Occidental Oil Shale, Inc.In-situ recovery of constituents from fragmented ore
US4344488 *Aug 18, 1980Aug 17, 1982Marks Alvin MCharged aerosol petroleum recovery method and apparatus
US4387768 *Apr 13, 1981Jun 14, 1983The Standard Oil CompanyModified in situ retorting of oil shale
US6068053 *Nov 7, 1997May 30, 2000Baker Hughes, Ltd.Fluid separation and reinjection systems
US6250391 *Jan 29, 1999Jun 26, 2001Glenn C. ProudfootProducing hydrocarbons from well with underground reservoir
US7357180 *Apr 22, 2005Apr 15, 2008Shell Oil CompanyInhibiting effects of sloughing in wellbores
US7644765Oct 19, 2007Jan 12, 2010Shell Oil CompanyHeating tar sands formations while controlling pressure
US7673681Oct 19, 2007Mar 9, 2010Shell Oil CompanyTreating tar sands formations with karsted zones
US7673786Apr 20, 2007Mar 9, 2010Shell Oil CompanyWelding shield for coupling heaters
US7677310Oct 19, 2007Mar 16, 2010Shell Oil CompanyCreating and maintaining a gas cap in tar sands formations
US7677314Oct 19, 2007Mar 16, 2010Shell Oil CompanyMethod of condensing vaporized water in situ to treat tar sands formations
US7681647Mar 23, 2010Shell Oil CompanyMethod of producing drive fluid in situ in tar sands formations
US7683296Mar 23, 2010Shell Oil CompanyAdjusting alloy compositions for selected properties in temperature limited heaters
US7703513Oct 19, 2007Apr 27, 2010Shell Oil CompanyWax barrier for use with in situ processes for treating formations
US7717171Oct 19, 2007May 18, 2010Shell Oil CompanyMoving hydrocarbons through portions of tar sands formations with a fluid
US7730945Oct 19, 2007Jun 8, 2010Shell Oil CompanyUsing geothermal energy to heat a portion of a formation for an in situ heat treatment process
US7730946Oct 19, 2007Jun 8, 2010Shell Oil CompanyTreating tar sands formations with dolomite
US7730947Oct 19, 2007Jun 8, 2010Shell Oil CompanyCreating fluid injectivity in tar sands formations
US7785427Apr 20, 2007Aug 31, 2010Shell Oil CompanyHigh strength alloys
US7793722Apr 20, 2007Sep 14, 2010Shell Oil CompanyNon-ferromagnetic overburden casing
US7798220Apr 18, 2008Sep 21, 2010Shell Oil CompanyIn situ heat treatment of a tar sands formation after drive process treatment
US7798221Sep 21, 2010Shell Oil CompanyIn situ recovery from a hydrocarbon containing formation
US7831133Apr 21, 2006Nov 9, 2010Shell Oil CompanyInsulated conductor temperature limited heater for subsurface heating coupled in a three-phase WYE configuration
US7831134Apr 21, 2006Nov 9, 2010Shell Oil CompanyGrouped exposed metal heaters
US7832484Apr 18, 2008Nov 16, 2010Shell Oil CompanyMolten salt as a heat transfer fluid for heating a subsurface formation
US7841401Oct 19, 2007Nov 30, 2010Shell Oil CompanyGas injection to inhibit migration during an in situ heat treatment process
US7841408Apr 18, 2008Nov 30, 2010Shell Oil CompanyIn situ heat treatment from multiple layers of a tar sands formation
US7841425Nov 30, 2010Shell Oil CompanyDrilling subsurface wellbores with cutting structures
US7845411Dec 7, 2010Shell Oil CompanyIn situ heat treatment process utilizing a closed loop heating system
US7849922Dec 14, 2010Shell Oil CompanyIn situ recovery from residually heated sections in a hydrocarbon containing formation
US7860377Apr 21, 2006Dec 28, 2010Shell Oil CompanySubsurface connection methods for subsurface heaters
US7866385Apr 20, 2007Jan 11, 2011Shell Oil CompanyPower systems utilizing the heat of produced formation fluid
US7866386Oct 13, 2008Jan 11, 2011Shell Oil CompanyIn situ oxidation of subsurface formations
US7866388Jan 11, 2011Shell Oil CompanyHigh temperature methods for forming oxidizer fuel
US7912358Apr 20, 2007Mar 22, 2011Shell Oil CompanyAlternate energy source usage for in situ heat treatment processes
US7931086Apr 18, 2008Apr 26, 2011Shell Oil CompanyHeating systems for heating subsurface formations
US7942197Apr 21, 2006May 17, 2011Shell Oil CompanyMethods and systems for producing fluid from an in situ conversion process
US7942203May 17, 2011Shell Oil CompanyThermal processes for subsurface formations
US7950453Apr 18, 2008May 31, 2011Shell Oil CompanyDownhole burner systems and methods for heating subsurface formations
US7986869Apr 21, 2006Jul 26, 2011Shell Oil CompanyVarying properties along lengths of temperature limited heaters
US8011451Sep 6, 2011Shell Oil CompanyRanging methods for developing wellbores in subsurface formations
US8027571Sep 27, 2011Shell Oil CompanyIn situ conversion process systems utilizing wellbores in at least two regions of a formation
US8042610Oct 25, 2011Shell Oil CompanyParallel heater system for subsurface formations
US8070840Apr 21, 2006Dec 6, 2011Shell Oil CompanyTreatment of gas from an in situ conversion process
US8083813Dec 27, 2011Shell Oil CompanyMethods of producing transportation fuel
US8113272Oct 13, 2008Feb 14, 2012Shell Oil CompanyThree-phase heaters with common overburden sections for heating subsurface formations
US8146661Oct 13, 2008Apr 3, 2012Shell Oil CompanyCryogenic treatment of gas
US8146669Oct 13, 2008Apr 3, 2012Shell Oil CompanyMulti-step heater deployment in a subsurface formation
US8151880Dec 9, 2010Apr 10, 2012Shell Oil CompanyMethods of making transportation fuel
US8151907Apr 10, 2009Apr 10, 2012Shell Oil CompanyDual motor systems and non-rotating sensors for use in developing wellbores in subsurface formations
US8162059Apr 24, 2012Shell Oil CompanyInduction heaters used to heat subsurface formations
US8162405Apr 24, 2012Shell Oil CompanyUsing tunnels for treating subsurface hydrocarbon containing formations
US8172335May 8, 2012Shell Oil CompanyElectrical current flow between tunnels for use in heating subsurface hydrocarbon containing formations
US8177305Apr 10, 2009May 15, 2012Shell Oil CompanyHeater connections in mines and tunnels for use in treating subsurface hydrocarbon containing formations
US8191630Apr 28, 2010Jun 5, 2012Shell Oil CompanyCreating fluid injectivity in tar sands formations
US8192682Apr 26, 2010Jun 5, 2012Shell Oil CompanyHigh strength alloys
US8196658Jun 12, 2012Shell Oil CompanyIrregular spacing of heat sources for treating hydrocarbon containing formations
US8200072Oct 24, 2003Jun 12, 2012Shell Oil CompanyTemperature limited heaters for heating subsurface formations or wellbores
US8220539Jul 17, 2012Shell Oil CompanyControlling hydrogen pressure in self-regulating nuclear reactors used to treat a subsurface formation
US8224163Oct 24, 2003Jul 17, 2012Shell Oil CompanyVariable frequency temperature limited heaters
US8224164Oct 24, 2003Jul 17, 2012Shell Oil CompanyInsulated conductor temperature limited heaters
US8224165Jul 17, 2012Shell Oil CompanyTemperature limited heater utilizing non-ferromagnetic conductor
US8225866Jul 21, 2010Jul 24, 2012Shell Oil CompanyIn situ recovery from a hydrocarbon containing formation
US8230927May 16, 2011Jul 31, 2012Shell Oil CompanyMethods and systems for producing fluid from an in situ conversion process
US8233782Jul 31, 2012Shell Oil CompanyGrouped exposed metal heaters
US8238730Aug 7, 2012Shell Oil CompanyHigh voltage temperature limited heaters
US8240774Aug 14, 2012Shell Oil CompanySolution mining and in situ treatment of nahcolite beds
US8256512Oct 9, 2009Sep 4, 2012Shell Oil CompanyMovable heaters for treating subsurface hydrocarbon containing formations
US8261832Sep 11, 2012Shell Oil CompanyHeating subsurface formations with fluids
US8267170Sep 18, 2012Shell Oil CompanyOffset barrier wells in subsurface formations
US8267185Sep 18, 2012Shell Oil CompanyCirculated heated transfer fluid systems used to treat a subsurface formation
US8272455Sep 25, 2012Shell Oil CompanyMethods for forming wellbores in heated formations
US8276661Oct 2, 2012Shell Oil CompanyHeating subsurface formations by oxidizing fuel on a fuel carrier
US8281861Oct 9, 2012Shell Oil CompanyCirculated heated transfer fluid heating of subsurface hydrocarbon formations
US8327681Dec 11, 2012Shell Oil CompanyWellbore manufacturing processes for in situ heat treatment processes
US8327932Apr 9, 2010Dec 11, 2012Shell Oil CompanyRecovering energy from a subsurface formation
US8353347Oct 9, 2009Jan 15, 2013Shell Oil CompanyDeployment of insulated conductors for treating subsurface formations
US8355623Jan 15, 2013Shell Oil CompanyTemperature limited heaters with high power factors
US8381815Apr 18, 2008Feb 26, 2013Shell Oil CompanyProduction from multiple zones of a tar sands formation
US8434555Apr 9, 2010May 7, 2013Shell Oil CompanyIrregular pattern treatment of a subsurface formation
US8448707May 28, 2013Shell Oil CompanyNon-conducting heater casings
US8459359Apr 18, 2008Jun 11, 2013Shell Oil CompanyTreating nahcolite containing formations and saline zones
US8485252Jul 11, 2012Jul 16, 2013Shell Oil CompanyIn situ recovery from a hydrocarbon containing formation
US8536497Oct 13, 2008Sep 17, 2013Shell Oil CompanyMethods for forming long subsurface heaters
US8555971May 31, 2012Oct 15, 2013Shell Oil CompanyTreating tar sands formations with dolomite
US8562078Nov 25, 2009Oct 22, 2013Shell Oil CompanyHydrocarbon production from mines and tunnels used in treating subsurface hydrocarbon containing formations
US8579031May 17, 2011Nov 12, 2013Shell Oil CompanyThermal processes for subsurface formations
US8606091Oct 20, 2006Dec 10, 2013Shell Oil CompanySubsurface heaters with low sulfidation rates
US8608249Apr 26, 2010Dec 17, 2013Shell Oil CompanyIn situ thermal processing of an oil shale formation
US8627887Dec 8, 2008Jan 14, 2014Shell Oil CompanyIn situ recovery from a hydrocarbon containing formation
US8631866Apr 8, 2011Jan 21, 2014Shell Oil CompanyLeak detection in circulated fluid systems for heating subsurface formations
US8636323Nov 25, 2009Jan 28, 2014Shell Oil CompanyMines and tunnels for use in treating subsurface hydrocarbon containing formations
US8662175Apr 18, 2008Mar 4, 2014Shell Oil CompanyVarying properties of in situ heat treatment of a tar sands formation based on assessed viscosities
US8701768Apr 8, 2011Apr 22, 2014Shell Oil CompanyMethods for treating hydrocarbon formations
US8701769Apr 8, 2011Apr 22, 2014Shell Oil CompanyMethods for treating hydrocarbon formations based on geology
US8701788Dec 22, 2011Apr 22, 2014Chevron U.S.A. Inc.Preconditioning a subsurface shale formation by removing extractible organics
US8739874Apr 8, 2011Jun 3, 2014Shell Oil CompanyMethods for heating with slots in hydrocarbon formations
US8752904Apr 10, 2009Jun 17, 2014Shell Oil CompanyHeated fluid flow in mines and tunnels used in heating subsurface hydrocarbon containing formations
US8789586Jul 12, 2013Jul 29, 2014Shell Oil CompanyIn situ recovery from a hydrocarbon containing formation
US8791396Apr 18, 2008Jul 29, 2014Shell Oil CompanyFloating insulated conductors for heating subsurface formations
US8820406Apr 8, 2011Sep 2, 2014Shell Oil CompanyElectrodes for electrical current flow heating of subsurface formations with conductive material in wellbore
US8833453Apr 8, 2011Sep 16, 2014Shell Oil CompanyElectrodes for electrical current flow heating of subsurface formations with tapered copper thickness
US8839860Dec 22, 2011Sep 23, 2014Chevron U.S.A. Inc.In-situ Kerogen conversion and product isolation
US8851170Apr 9, 2010Oct 7, 2014Shell Oil CompanyHeater assisted fluid treatment of a subsurface formation
US8851177Dec 22, 2011Oct 7, 2014Chevron U.S.A. Inc.In-situ kerogen conversion and oxidant regeneration
US8857506May 24, 2013Oct 14, 2014Shell Oil CompanyAlternate energy source usage methods for in situ heat treatment processes
US8881806Oct 9, 2009Nov 11, 2014Shell Oil CompanySystems and methods for treating a subsurface formation with electrical conductors
US8936089Dec 22, 2011Jan 20, 2015Chevron U.S.A. Inc.In-situ kerogen conversion and recovery
US8992771May 25, 2012Mar 31, 2015Chevron U.S.A. Inc.Isolating lubricating oils from subsurface shale formations
US8997869Dec 22, 2011Apr 7, 2015Chevron U.S.A. Inc.In-situ kerogen conversion and product upgrading
US9016370Apr 6, 2012Apr 28, 2015Shell Oil CompanyPartial solution mining of hydrocarbon containing layers prior to in situ heat treatment
US9022109Jan 21, 2014May 5, 2015Shell Oil CompanyLeak detection in circulated fluid systems for heating subsurface formations
US9022118Oct 9, 2009May 5, 2015Shell Oil CompanyDouble insulated heaters for treating subsurface formations
US9033033Dec 22, 2011May 19, 2015Chevron U.S.A. Inc.Electrokinetic enhanced hydrocarbon recovery from oil shale
US9033042Apr 8, 2011May 19, 2015Shell Oil CompanyForming bitumen barriers in subsurface hydrocarbon formations
US9051829Oct 9, 2009Jun 9, 2015Shell Oil CompanyPerforated electrical conductors for treating subsurface formations
US9127523Apr 8, 2011Sep 8, 2015Shell Oil CompanyBarrier methods for use in subsurface hydrocarbon formations
US9127538Apr 8, 2011Sep 8, 2015Shell Oil CompanyMethodologies for treatment of hydrocarbon formations using staged pyrolyzation
US9129728Oct 9, 2009Sep 8, 2015Shell Oil CompanySystems and methods of forming subsurface wellbores
US9133398Dec 22, 2011Sep 15, 2015Chevron U.S.A. Inc.In-situ kerogen conversion and recycling
US9181467Dec 22, 2011Nov 10, 2015Uchicago Argonne, LlcPreparation and use of nano-catalysts for in-situ reaction with kerogen
US9181780Apr 18, 2008Nov 10, 2015Shell Oil CompanyControlling and assessing pressure conditions during treatment of tar sands formations
US9309755Oct 4, 2012Apr 12, 2016Shell Oil CompanyThermal expansion accommodation for circulated fluid systems used to heat subsurface formations
US20050269088 *Apr 22, 2005Dec 8, 2005Vinegar Harold JInhibiting effects of sloughing in wellbores
US20070137857 *Apr 21, 2006Jun 21, 2007Vinegar Harold JLow temperature monitoring system for subsurface barriers
US20090071647 *Apr 7, 2008Mar 19, 2009Vinegar Harold JThermal processes for subsurface formations
US20090272526 *Nov 5, 2009David Booth BurnsElectrical current flow between tunnels for use in heating subsurface hydrocarbon containing formations
US20110170843 *Sep 29, 2010Jul 14, 2011Shell Oil CompanyGrouped exposed metal heaters
Classifications
U.S. Classification166/259, 166/261, 166/247, 166/257, 166/309
International ClassificationE21B43/16, E21B43/24
Cooperative ClassificationE21B43/2403
European ClassificationE21B43/24F