Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3595386 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateJul 27, 1971
Filing dateJan 27, 1969
Priority dateJan 27, 1969
Publication numberUS 3595386 A, US 3595386A, US-A-3595386, US3595386 A, US3595386A
InventorsHradel Joseph R
Original AssigneeHradel Joseph R
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Process for beneficiation of nonmagnetic material
US 3595386 A
Abstract  available in
Images(1)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

United States Patent References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 460.962 l0/l89l Gouyard 209/219 Inventor Joseph R. Hradel 6482 South Mission Road, Mount Pleasant. Mich. 48858 Appl. No. 794,103

Filed .Ian. 27, 1969 Patented July 27, 1971 PROCESS FOR BENEFICIATION OF NONMAGNETIC MATERIAL 6 Claims, 1 Drawing Fig.

Int. Cl B03c 1/00 Field of Search A. 209/39. 40,

2l9,2l4,2l5,2l2.2l3,232,220,2l8,478,216. 227. 131.1. 3l4,8,8.l;2l0/222. 223

2,325.149 7/l943 Rakowsky t. 209/232 X 2,71 1,249 6/l955 Laurila 209/219 2,748,940 6/1956 Roth 209/219 3,294,237 l2/l966 Weston 20 /227 X 3,372,803 3/l968 De Lisle 209/214 X 3,289.836 l2/l966 Weston 209/214 Primary Examiner- Frank W. Lutter Assistant Examiner- Robert Halper Attorney-C. Kenneth Bjork ABSTRACT: A novel process for beneficiating nonmagnetic ores and other source materials, particularly lean iron ores, wherein paramagnetic material in such ores is given a temporary positive magnetic susceptibility, passed within the field of a moving permanent magnet system before the material decays to its natural state, and the so activated paramagnetic substance separated by deflection toward the magnet system and recovered from nondeflected diamagnetic material in admixture therewith.

PROCESS FOR BENEFICIATION OF NONMAGNETIC MATERIAL The present invention relates to a novel process for separating paramagnetic material from diamagnetic material and more particularly is concerned with a novel process for beneficiating ores which are not naturally magnetic such as, for example, lean nonmagnetic iron ores including tailings from conventional ore processing, to recover the bulk of the useful and desired metal values therefrom.

Current ore beneficiating employing electromagnetic and magnetic separatory techniques as exemplified by US. Patents Nos. 2,954,122, 2,325,l49 and 2,558,635 are applicable only in separating and recovering from ore bodies the naturally magnetic portions of the ore or those metal values which can be given a prolonged magnetism from an induced electromagnetic force and which retain this magnetism until the material is demagnetized by passage through an opposing electric coil or other demagnetizing means.

Many lean ores, particularly ferrous ores, which are abundantly and widely distributed throughout the world are not presently mined because they are not susceptible to beneficiation by such known techniques; Additionally, nonmagnetic tailings resulting from beneficiation of magnetic ores contain a large percentage of iron values which at present are discarded because these values are unresponsive to separation by magnetic beneficiation techniques now practiced.

Now, unexpectedly l have discovered a novel process for separating and recovering nonmagnetic but paramagnetic metal values, particularly nonmagnetic iron values, form ores and other source materials including tailings from gangues resulting from conventional iron separatory techniques.

It is a principal object of the present invention to provide a novel process for separating and recovering paramagnetic materials which are nonmagnetic, i.e. are not naturally magnetic or will not hold any induced magnetism for a prolonged period of time, from diamagnetic materials.

It is also an object of the present invention to provide a novel process for beneficiating and recovering iron values from source materials which do not respond to and cannot be used in conventional magnetic beneficiating techniques.

These and other objects and advantages readily will become apparent from the detailed description presented hereinafter when read in accordance with the FIGURE of the appended drawing which shows a schematic flow diagram of one embodiment of the process of the present invention.

in general the process of the present invention comprises providing a particulate nonmagnetic source material which cannot be rendered permanently magnetic but which contains at least one paramagnetic substance to be separated and recovered. This source material is passed through or within the effective range of an electric coil thereby upsetting said material and imparting a temporary positive magnetic susceptibility to said paramagnetic material and a negative magnetic susceptibility to any diamagnetic material present therein. The so upset material is brought within the field of a moving permanent magnet system before the positive magnetic suscepti bility in the paramagnetic material decays to a state where said paramagnetic material is not attracted by said magnetic system thereby deflecting and separating said paramagnetic material from diamagnetic materials present which received a negative magnetic susceptibility from exposure to said coil. The term upset for the purpose of this specification is defined as the act of disturbing the electromagnetic equilibrium of a paramagnetic or diamagnetic material form its natural state by electromagnetic means.

This method is particularly adapted for use in separating and recovering iron values from nonmagnetic ore bodies and other source materials as has been pointed out hereinbefore. Representative examples of such iron source materials are iron ores containing such paramagnetic materials as the spicu- -lar and cherty hematites consisting largely of Fe embedded in diamagnetic gangues of the nature of silica as are found in the upper central United States. These materials, although lean, represent an economically beneficiable reserve beyond that which is currently being recovered if consideration is given to the fact that differences in magnetic susceptibility values constitute a basis for separation of iron compounds form their gangues. Other iron bearing compounds are contained in lean ores such as mascarite, the nonmagnetic fraction of pyritic magnetite, pyrite, siderite, limonite, and the green potassium iron silicate as well as the tailings from previous beneficiations of these ores. All of these are available in abundant quantities in various parts of the United States as well as throughout the world. Hereinafter the term ore" as used in the specification will mean and include both naturally occurring nonmagnetic ores such as the lean ores exemplified hereinbefore as well as tailings and other source materials resulting from prior beneficiation or separatory processes.

Ordinarily in carrying out the practice of the present invention, an ore is crushed or ground to break it down and effect separation of the paramagnetic metal values from diamagnetic gangue materials. Usually the ore is crushed to pass a number 60 US. Standard Sieve, and particulate materials ranging from 60 to 325 mesh or finer have been found to be particularly suited to the practice of the present invention. Coarser particles can be employed, if desired, provided that effective physical separation from gangue material is realized.

The crushed ore is subjected to the influence of an energized electric coil of sufficient energy and for a period of time to establish a temporary positive magnetic susceptibility in the paramagnetic materials present therein and a negative magnetic susceptibility in any diamagnetic substances which may be in admixture therewith. The resulting positive and negative magnetic susceptibilities in the upset material are not per manent or even prolonged in duration but are of short duration, i.e. exist from less than a second to a minute or more and ordinarily have a maximum of about several minutes.

The so upset ore is passed within the field of at least one rotating permanent magnet, usually a plurality of such magnets, before the positive magnetic susceptibility given to the paramagnetic material in the ore decays to a state where the material becomes unresponsive to the permanent magnet system. One particularly effective system employs a plurality of magnets mounted on a moving frame, for example, a rotating drum. This system has been found to be of a high utility since the rotation of the magnets serves to substantially eliminate undesirable buildup of the paramagnetic material, even for a short period of time, on the magnets or clogging of the deflection chamber, adjacent thereto if such is employed in the apparatus for carrying out the process.

Optimum in-separation of the active paramagnetic material from diamagnetic material in admixture therewith is realized by utilizing a minimum period of time between upset and subjection to the magnetic field. The sooner the material is brought under the influence of the permanent magnet the more positive and greater will be the deflection and consequent separation of the desired paramagnetic product. As indicated hereinbefore, at a maximum about one minute is employed and preferably this time is from less than a second up to several seconds.

The deflected paramagnetic product after it is passed beyondthe magnetic field is collected separately from the nondeflected diamagnetic byproduct. In some instances it is to be understood that the nondeflected diamagnetic material may be the desired product or both materials may be of interest.

Conveniently, the starting material is passed by gravity flow through an energizing coil past the magnet system and the separated materials further passed into a collection system. Alternatively, a liquid pumping system for handling an ore in aqueous suspension can be employed. This latter procedure assures that the throughput rates of the ore can be controlled by the pumping rates thus reducing to a minimum, e.g. a fraction of a second, the time required to transport the ore between the energized upset coil and the permanent magnet system. This provides the added advantage that the flow rate through the coil can be adjusted and maintained to be the same as the flow rate past the moving permanent magnets thereby serving to further control the product distribution and eliminate congestion in the vicinity of the magnets and/or the collectors.

The collected paramagnetic product can be recovered and used directly, or. in the case of iron ores, can be further processed concentrated and otherwise converted, for use in particular situations.

Alternating current in the upset coil is preferred over direct current in that the former offers the further advantage that minimum clogging or buildup in the core is found. This is particularly true when utilizing silicate and sulfur based iron ores, e.g. marcasite, pyrite, and pyritic hematite. Oxide and hydroxide ores are less prone to clogging and a direct current source is just as effective as an alternating current for these latter materials.

One embodiment of a hydraulic system for carrying out the present process is shown schematically in the FIGURE of the drawing. in this embodiment, a mixing-holding-feed hopper l0, usually fitted with a valve near its bottom, is provided. This hopper is connected at its bottom to the top of a flow through electrically powered upset coil 12. The bottom of the hopper 10 is connected to the top ofa deflection chamber 14. This chamber I4 is curved along one side of its length 5 so as to coincide generally with the contour of a cylindrical frame 16 holding a plurality of permanent magnets 18. Preferably the wall of the chamber adjacent the magnet system is in close proximity to this system. The bottom of chamber 14 is fitted with a divider 20 which serves to direct diamagnetic byproduct to a gangue thickener collecting vessel 22 and paramagnetic product to a product collector 24. Conveniently the intake at the top of the deflection chamber has a cross-sectional area about equal to that of the two discharge outlets of the bottom of this chamber. Ordinarily, the cross-sectional area of each of the discharge outlets is slightly smaller than 0.5 that of the intake. This, in turn, provides for a slight back pressure in the system thereby providing during operation cleaner cuts in a more rapid manner with less recycle. Each of the containers 22 and 24 is fitted respectively with a conduit 26 and 28 which fed to a common transport conduit 30. Conduit 30 in turn is connected through pump 32 to hopper 10. The hopper 10 is fitted with an ore supply conduit 34 which extends to an ore supply reservoir 36. Conduit 30 can be fitted with a makeup conduit 38 connected to a fluid supply source (not shown).

in operation of this system, in one embodiment a ground ore and a liquid carrier, usually water, with or without additional agents such as, for example surfactants, are blended in the hopper 10 to provide a slurry of predetermined consistency. This slurry is controllably fed through the coil 12 where the ore is upset and the paramagnetic material of the ore is given a temporary positive magnetic susceptibility. The so upset ore containing slurry is directed to the inlet of the deflecting chamber 14. As the slurry passes through this chamber 14 and past the revolving magnets 18 the paramagnetic material is deflected towards and attracted by the magnets. This material follows the contour of the chamber adjacent the magnets 18 and drops form outlets at the bottom of the collection chamber 14 into the collector 24. The nondeflected diamagnetic material falls directly into the gangue collector 22.

The materials are settled in their respective collectors, and recovered by conventional means. The supernatant liquid is removed form the collectors 22 and 24 by conduits 26 and 28 being pumped into conduit 30 and returned to hopper 10 for reuse. Such reuse of the carrier liquid provides for the maximum of product recovery as any useful values retained in the liquid will be again passed through the beneficiation process. The diamagnetic gangue can be recycled for further beneficiation if desired.

Alternatively, the hydraulic conduit and pumping system can be eliminated and dry material by gravity or force fed from the hopper through the energizing coil. passed through the field of the moving permanent magnet system and on intc the collection bins.

Other modifications can be employed. Also electrical assemblies, mechanical and hydraulic systems suitable for use in the practice of the invention for any particular applications are within the knowledge of one skilled in the art to which this process pertains.

The following examples will serve to further illustrate the present invention but are not meant to limit it thereto.

EXAMPLE 1.

Nonmagnetic cherty hematite tailings or spicular hematite having various amounts of iron (expressed as percent Fe 0 and ground to pass a 60 mesh U.S. Standard Sieve but be retained on a 325 mesh sieve were passed dry through a 2,500 ohm upset coil energized by an alternating current circuit and operating at 16 volts. These tailings were discard nonmagnetic gangue products resulting from conventional magnetic ore beneficiation processes.

Each of the upset materials was retained for a predetermined period of time and then passed within the field of a revolving permanent magnet system. The amount of sample attraction, i.e. beneficiation of the iron source, by the permanent magnets was determined.

The results of this study which was designed to illustrate the operability of the present process for beneficiating paramagnetic, but not permanently magnetic, materials from diamagnetic substances admixed therewith are summarized in table I. These results also show the criticality of passing the upset material within the field of the permanent magnet system within a short period after being activated by the upset coil to achieve optimum in beneficiation.

TABLE I Percent sample fraction in beneficiate (time in min. after being upset) Iron source material percent iron Time between upset and passage through magnet field.

EXAMPLE 2.

Using a separatory apparatus of general construction similar as that shown in the FIGURE of the drawing, an aqueous slurry of a cherty hematite tailing (one kilogram of iron source material) and having a known iron content (expressed as percent Fe 0 and ground to a predetermined particle size range was pumped through an alternating current (l6 volts) energized upset coil (2,500 ohms). The resulting upset iron source material was pumped into a deflection chamber which was adjacent a plurality of permanent magnets mounted on a revolving drum. The time between upset and passing of a given particle of the iron source material in the field of the magnets was a fraction of a second at a maximum. The product materials were collected in separate bins, the gangue material being recycled for a total treating time of five minutes. After this period of time, the beneficiated iron product was recovered and the iron content determined by conventional analytical techniques.

The results of this study are summarized in table ll which follows.

TABLE II Beneficiated product Ore pat'ticulation (mesh sieve) Fe in Wt. Iron feed percent content Gangue Run Retained (percent of (percent (percent No. Passed 0n F9103) feed F8203) F0203) Dry iron source materials of particle size ranging from about 60 to 325 mesh and which had been freed of all naturally magnetic materials were passed by gravity feed through Various modifications can be made in the present invention without departing from the spirit or scope thereof for it is understood that l limit myself only as defined in the appended claims I an upset coil of 7,500 ohms and activated by alternating curl Clalml rent at a potentlal of [6 volts. The upset material was passed 1 A process for Separating nonmagnetic paramagnetic through 'f l f a revolvmg magnet material from diamagnetic material which comprises: system In a Single P the P between of a. providing a finely divided mixture of paramagnetic and P and field Q belng 'f l0 diamagnetic material, said mixture being further characseconds. The diamagnetic materials. i.e. tailings, which were terized as being not naturally magnetic, not named by the magnet system were Collected Separately b. passing said mixture within the effective range of an elecfrom the paramagnetic tron product, Le. beneficlate. that had icaIly energized upset coil thereby upsetting aid mix. received a temporary posltlvc magnetic Susceptibility and was t re and imparting a temporary positive magnetic suscepdeficc ed t war s th m gn Thi latter material W35 tibility to said paramagnetic material of said mixture and separated from the magnetic field and recovered. The iron a negative magnetic susceptibility to said diamagnetic contents of the recovered fractions were determined by conmaterial of said mixture, said temporary positive and ventional analytical techniques. negative magnetic susceptibilities existing in said materi- The results of a number of runs with various iron source als for a period of time of from less than i second up to materials are summarized in table ill. about several minutes TABLE III Percent of iron compounds Percent iron Percent compounds recovery In Run No. Iron source material Nature otlron values in loading from loading beneficiate stock stock product In tails l. Pyritlc hematite.... FeS-FezOr lusterous..... 88. 4 89. 3 90. 0 25. 5 2. Marcasite FeSz yellow 66. 0 87. 7 70. 0 37. 0 3.. yrite...... FeS black 96. 5 98. 8 98. 0 30.0 4.. Siderite FeCO; yellow 55.0 34.0 95.0 35.0 5.. KFesillcate Green ore 54. 1 21. 3 70. 0 50.0 6.. Limonite Fe(OH); yellow 67. 5 22. 6 95. 0 60. 0 7.. .do ..do 47. 2 17. 7 80. 0 30. O 8.. Cherty siderite FeCO; red 60. 0 30. O 95. 0 45. 0 9.... Hematite F620] splcular-..- 78.0 56. 8 70. 0 25.0 10... ..do F920: ch tty 72. 0 69. 3 90. 0 37. 0 l1 ..do. d0 52.0 38.0 60.0 20.0 1 d0 do 25.0 52.0 35.0 10.0

EXAMPLE 4' c. bringing the so upset mixture within the field ofa moving A number of studies were run to determine the current consumption for various diamagnetic and paramagnetic substances in an upset coil. For these studies, a coil of2,500 ohms at a predetermined temperature was energized by alternating current of 16 volts potential and a core of a predetermined material placed within the coil. The time for consumption of a watt-hour of energy was measured. The results of these runs are summarized in table IV. The marked differences iii power consumption rates for the various materials as shown in the table indicates the coil influences a given materialin a specific manner, Le. gives it a temporary positive or negative susceptibility, and thus provides the basis for the present process for recovering useful paramagnetic materials from nonmagnetic source materials.

permanent magnet system within the time interval that the paramagnetic material retains its temporary positive magnetic susceptibility and is attracted and deflected towards said magnet system, and

d. recovering the so deflected paramagnetic material.

2. The process as defined in claim 1 wherein the upset material is passed through said electrically energized upset coil.

3. The process as defined in claim 2 wherein the upset mixture is passed adjacent to a rotating system of a plurality of permanent magnets.

4. The process as defined in claim 3 wherein the mixture comprises nonmagnetic iron source material and the time interval between upset and passage within the field of said mov- TABLE ing magnet system ranges from less than one second to about temp.. Core material Sec/watt hr. one mmute' I l v Hematite A L 605 5. The process as defined in claim 4 where n the iron source 5 Hematite p, l 2 5 material is a lean iron ore or tatlings resulting from conven- 62 Hematite C 1 tional ore processing operations, said material being substan- {85 1 tially free from naturally magnetic substances and said materigg i z gz 8g; al ranging from about 60 to about 325 mesh U.S. Standard 66 Zn dustji 594 Sieve. I I 2 6 iiii gtik'die 22 6. The process as defined in claim 5 wherein the iron source 56 Zirconium granula material is provided as an aqueous slurry and including the 2i Cuo 7 65 step of pumping said slurry through said energized coil and ad- 50 873 l Designates item to be paramagnetic. 7 Separate samples from different sources.

jacent said rotating system of permanent magnets.

UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE Patent No.

Dated July 27, 1971 Inventor(s) Joseph R. Hradel It is certified that error appears in the aboveiderit1f1d patent and that said Letters Patent are hereby corrected as shown below:

Column 1, line 11,

Column 1, line 67,

Oolumn 3, line 26,

Column 3, line #5,

Column 3, line 62,

change form" to --fromdelete the letter "s" before change "is fitted" insert --a.lso-- "form" to --from-- Signed and sealed this 1 8th day of January 1 972.

(SEAL) Attest:

EDWARD M.FLETCHER,

Attesting Officer ROBERT GO'I'TSCHALK Ac ting Commissioner of Patents

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US460962 *Jan 6, 1891Oct 13, 1891 Electro-magnetic separator
US2325149 *Jul 29, 1940Jul 27, 1943Minerals Beneficiation IncProcess of separating ores
US2711249 *May 20, 1954Jun 21, 1955Fur Unternehmungen Der Eisen UDrum magnet separator
US2748940 *Sep 17, 1954Jun 5, 1956Erwin RothMagnetic separator
US3289836 *Oct 14, 1964Dec 6, 1966David WestonMethod and apparatus for the magnetic separation of particulate materials
US3294237 *May 31, 1963Dec 27, 1966David WestonMagnetic separator
US3372803 *Jul 30, 1964Mar 12, 1968Chembestos CorpMeans and method for removing iron from asbestos ore
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3830367 *Jun 26, 1972Aug 20, 1974Stone WHigh intensity wet magnetic separators
US4071442 *Aug 11, 1975Jan 31, 1978Occidental Petroleum CorporationMethod and apparatus for recovery of aluminum from solid waste
US4102780 *Mar 9, 1976Jul 25, 1978S. G. Frantz Company, Inc.Method and apparatus for magnetic separation of particles in a fluid carrier
US4235710 *Jul 3, 1978Nov 25, 1980S. G. Frantz Company, Inc.Methods and apparatus for separating particles using a magnetic barrier
US4239619 *May 7, 1979Dec 16, 1980Union Carbide CorporationProcess and apparatus for separating magnetic particles within an ore
US4351483 *Jun 4, 1980Sep 28, 1982Cia Minera Rio Colorado, S.A.Separation of arsenic from fluorite ore, by means of magnetic separation and flotation of the pyrites to which it is associated
US4506835 *Jun 7, 1982Mar 26, 1985Occidental Research Corp.Oil shale beneficiation
US4743364 *Mar 16, 1984May 10, 1988Kyrazis Demos TMagnetic separation of electrically conducting particles from non-conducting material
US4874508 *Jan 19, 1988Oct 17, 1989Magnetics North, Inc.Magnetic separator
US5049540 *May 17, 1989Sep 17, 1991Idaho Research FoundationMethod and means for separating and classifying superconductive particles
US6722503 *Mar 12, 2002Apr 20, 2004Sedgman, LlcIntegrally formed separator/screen feedbox assembly
US7435933 *Jan 12, 2007Oct 14, 20083M Innovative Properties CompanyEnhanced sample processing devices, systems and methods
US8003926Sep 5, 2008Aug 23, 20113M Innovative Properties CompanyEnhanced sample processing devices, systems and methods
US8128893Dec 21, 2007Mar 6, 20123M Innovative Properties CompanyThermal transfer methods and structures for microfluidic systems
US8481901Aug 22, 2011Jul 9, 20133M Innovative Properties CompanyEnhanced sample processing devices, systems and methods
US8931331May 18, 2012Jan 13, 20153M Innovative Properties CompanySystems and methods for volumetric metering on a sample processing device
US9067205May 18, 2012Jun 30, 20153M Innovative Properties CompanySystems and methods for valving on a sample processing device
US9168523May 18, 2012Oct 27, 20153M Innovative Properties CompanySystems and methods for detecting the presence of a selected volume of material in a sample processing device
US20030173260 *Mar 12, 2002Sep 18, 2003Watters Larry A.Integrally formed separator/screen feedbox assembly
US20070114229 *Jan 12, 2007May 24, 20073M Innovative Properties CompanyEnhanced sample processing devices, systems and methods
US20080152546 *Dec 21, 2007Jun 26, 20083M Innovative Properties CompanyEnhanced sample processing devices, systems and methods
US20080314895 *Sep 5, 2008Dec 25, 20083M Innovative Properties CompanyEnhanced sample processing devices, systems and methods
USD672467May 18, 2011Dec 11, 20123M Innovative Properties CompanyRotatable sample processing disk
USD677395Sep 7, 2012Mar 5, 20133M Innovative Properties CompanyRotatable sample processing disk
WO2016166410A1 *Apr 11, 2016Oct 20, 2016Magsort OyA device and a method for separating weakly magnetic particles
Classifications
U.S. Classification209/8, 209/232, 209/39, 209/214
International ClassificationB03C1/00
Cooperative ClassificationB03C1/00
European ClassificationB03C1/00