Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3602332 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateAug 31, 1971
Filing dateJan 8, 1969
Priority dateJan 8, 1969
Also published asCA928626A1, DE2000434A1
Publication numberUS 3602332 A, US 3602332A, US-A-3602332, US3602332 A, US3602332A
InventorsBonderinko Hollenbeck
Original AssigneeGrace W R & Co
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Lead-loaded microporous acoustic panel
US 3602332 A
Abstract  available in
Images(3)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

United States Patent ll-ll 3,602,332

12 1nv6n16'r M0 Holkubetk [561 References c1166 m UNITED STATES PATENTS g Qf'j' z 'g i 2,999,041 9/1961 Lappala 181/33 .1) la 3,046,172 7/1962 11616.33... 181/33 .11) 73 A &C 3,072,582 1/1963 Frost 181/33 (.11) l l, 3,112,283 11/1963 Hansen @1111. .1s1/33 .11

, 3,160,549 12/1964 Caldwelletal. 181/33 .1)

3,215,225 11/1965 Kirschner l8l/33(.l) 3,253,947 5/1966 McClueret a1. 181/33 (.11) [54] LEAD-LOADED MICROPOROUS ACOUSTIC PANEL Primary Examiner-Robert S. Ward,Jr.

v F Attorneys-William L. Baker, C. E. Parker, Metro Kalimon [52] :jg g Isl/33G I and Theodore C. Browne I 161/159 [51] lnt.Cl. E04b 1/86, ABSTRACT: Sound, particularly airborne sound, is attenu- B32b 3/26, 1332b 5/ 18 ated using a microporous sheet of a resilient, normally solid [50] Field of Search. 181/33, polymeric material (e.g. polyethylene), which sheet has finely 33.1, 33.1 1; 161/159461 divided lead particles uniformly dispersed therein.

- EXTRACTE 1e p 6' E'XTRACTED l "68 .5 v .s .1 .e

, SAIMPLE W11, 113 /5 PATENTEU was] IQTi I SHEEI 1 OF 3 0 N 0 m N.

354E562: S ESS 09 PATEHTEH AUG31 IHYl SHEET 3 OF 3 w. m w m NI OOON m wE LEAD-LOADED MICROPOROUS ACOUSTIC PANEL This invention relates to a method of attenuating sound, and, more particularly, to a method of attenuating sound using a lightweight sheet material having excellent sound attenuating properties.

Of increasing concern to architects and structural engineers is the problem of unwanted sound or noise. Of particular concern is the problem regarding noise transmitted by pressure waves in the air, often termed airborne noise. One major contributing factor is the increase in the sources of airborne noise, for example, urban population, automotive vehicles, appliances and machinery, etc. The result is a demand for better and more efficient methods and materials for reducing undesirable sound, particularly air-transmitted sound.

The reduction of sound has been often accomplished in the past through the use of sheet lead. The superior performance of sheet lead barriers as airborne sound-attenuating media, for instance, over other barrier materials has been attributed to sheet leads high density, freedom from stiffness, good damping capacity and integrity as a nonpermeable membrane. Sheet lead, however, is heavy making it costly to ship and manipulate. Moreover, thin lead sheet is easy to tear when handled.

A material has now been found which is ideally suited for use as a sound-deadener, especially in the form of a barrier for deadening airborne sound. The material comprises a lightweight, microporous, resilient, normally solid, polymeric material containing uniformly dispersed finely divided lead particles. It has been discovered that such a sheet is similar in performance to sheet lead of equivalent weight per area with respect to the attenuation of sound, particularly airborne 7 sound. Such an advantageous result is somewhat unexpected in view of the fact that porous or permeable materials in the past have been considered to be undesirable for use as airborne soundattenuating media. The lightweight sheets of the invention, for example of less than about 1 pound per square foot, have high strength and high attenuation performance as compared to lead sheets The present discovery enables effective airborne sound deadening with less costly, lighter weight, flexible barrier materials. Moreover, when the pores of the material of the present invention are interconnecting or open, the material is permeable, permitting good oxygen/water vapor transmission in applications where such transmission is critical or desirable. The mechanisms ac countable for the highly desirable sound attenuating characteristics of the porous material of the invention even when the pores are open are not completely understood.

The sound-attenuating material of the invention is preferably employed in the formof a sheet or film, having a thickness, generally, of from 10 to 200 mils. In use for reducing airborne sound the material of the invention is preferably employed in the form of a sheet secured to a conventional construction material such as, for example, gypsum board, wood, rock wool or fiberglass batt, functioning as a barrier between the source of the unwanted sound the point of reception. lt can also be used effectively hung in plenums in a fashion similar to lead sheet. 7

The amount of lead dispersed in the porous material of the invention can vary over a relatively wide range. At least an amount of lead is employed which is sufficient to effect sound attenuation. Generally, the material will contain about to 80', preferably about to 25, percent by weight of resilient, normally solid polymeric material and about to 95, preferably about 45 to 75 percent by weight of lead particles. Additional optional additives, for instance, other fillers such as silica, high density ore particles and carbon black, stabilizers, flame retardants, plasticizers, antioxidants, processing aids, etc., can be used in an amount of up to about 50 weight percent.

By the term microporous as used here and in the claims is intended a material possessing pores having an average diameter in the range of about 0.01 to about 10 microns. The pores can be open, as mentioned above, or closed, that is, noninterconnecting. The void volume of the porous material of the invention will generally be in the range of about 30 to 70 percent. Preferably, as an airborne sound attenuating barrier, the material has an average pore diameter in the range of about 0.01 to l and a void volume of about to 60 percent.

The nonnally solid polymeric material in which the lead particles are dispersed should be resilient in order toallow for flexibility. Suitable nonnally solid resilient polymeric materials include thermoplastic resins, for example, polyolefins such as polyethylene, polybutene, polypropylene, etc., and vinyl polymers such as polymers of vinyl chloride, vinyl acetate, vinyl alcohol, etc., natural and synthetic elastomeric materials such asnatural rubber, butyl rubber, polyurethane rubber,

'acrylonitrile polymers, etc., as well as copolymers of the aforementioned materials.

Finely divided lead powder or dust having an apparent diameter of less than 40 microns is preferably employed in the porous material of the invention. Compounds containing lead such as'lead oxide, lead silicate, lead sulfide, etc., can also be used and the term lead particles as employed in the specification and the claims is intended to include elemental lead, and compounds of lead which would not have a deleterious or undesirable affect, for example be highly toxic, on the finished material of the invention.

The porous sound deadening material of the invention can be prepared by any of the suitable known polymer processing techniques. For instance a microporous sheet can be prepared by mixing a particulate, resilient, normally solid polymeric material such as polyethylene with a liquid solvent, for instance, hydrocarbon, or with a particulate solid material and heated to a temperature above the melting point of the polymer but below the decomposition temperature of solid liquid solvent or particulate solid material, molded or suitably shaped and then cooled to a temperature below the hardening point of the polymer. The liquid solvent or particulate solid can then be removed by known techniques, for example, evaporation, extraction with a solvent for the liquid or particulate solid which is a nonsolvent for the polymer, etc. The liquid solvent or particulate material removed to form the pore structure of the final material may be one which is capable of plasticizing the resilient, normally solid polymeric material employed. Thus a small amount of the material can be left in the final porous product to produce a more flexible product. I

The porous sound-attenuating materials of the invention can also be prepared using foaming or blowing agents such as azobisbutylnitrile, celogen, etc.

In the present invention, a polyolefin such as polyethylene is preferably employed as the resilient normally solid polymeric material. Suitable pore-forming agents for use with the polyolefin may be soluble or insoluble in water. Representative of the water-insoluble pore-forming agents are organic esters such as the sebacates, phthalates",' stearates, adipates and citrates; epoxy compounds such as epoxidized vegetable oil; phosphate esters such as tricresyl phosphate; hydrocarbon materials such as petroleum Qil including lubricating oils and fuel oils, hydrocarbon resin and asphalt and pure compounds such as eicosane; low molecular weight polymers such as polyisobutylene, polybutadiene, polystyrene, atactic polypropylene, ethylenepropylene rubber; ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer, oxidized polyethylene coumarone-indene resins and terpene resins; tall oil and linseed oil.

Illustrative of the water-soluble pore-forming agents are ethylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, polypropylene glycol, clycerol, and ethers and esters thereof; alkyl phosphates such astriethyl phosphateiipolyvinyl alcohol; polyacrylic acid and polyvinyl pyrrolidone.

Suitable extracting solvents for the above pore-forming agents which are nonsolvents for the polyolefin will be evident to those skilled in the art. In the present invention, petroleum mineral oil is the preferred solvent pore-forming agent and suitable extracting solvents for the petroleum mineral oil include chlorinated hydrocarbons; such as trichloroethylene,

tetrachloroethylene, carbon tetrachloride, methylene chloride, tetrachloroethane, etc; hydrocarbon solvents such as hexane, benzene, petroleum ether, toluene, cyclohexane, gasoline, etc.

The polyolefin and pore-forming agent can be mixed by any conventional manner which will produce a substantially uniform mixture. To produce a particularly uniform mixture, the components can be premixed at room temperature in a blender. The polyolefin pore-former blends may then be fluxed in a conventional mixer such as a Banbury mixer or melt homogenized in a convention two roll mill.

After being suitably mixed, the composition is molded or shaped in any conventional manner. Specifically, it can be fed to an cxtrunion, calendaring, injection molding, or compression molding machine to be processed into its final form.

Extraction of the shaped polyolefinic material may be carried out at a temperature which canrange anywhere from room temperature up to the melting point of the polyolefin as long as the polyolefin does not dissolve. The time'of the extraction will vary depending on the temperature used and the nature of the pore forming agent being extracted. For example, when a higher temperature is sued, the extraction time for petroleum mineral oil of low viscosity can .be only a few minutes, whereas if the extraction is performed at room temperature, the time required for extraction of a polymeric poreforming agent can be in the order of several hours.

The invention is further illustrated by the following examples:

EXAMPLE 1 A composition containing 10 parts by weight of an ethylenebutene copolymer (99 mole percent ethylene-l mole percent butene), 27 parts by weight of petroleum oil (Shellflex 411, 547 SSU at 1 10 F.), 43 parts by weight of lead oxide, 12 parts by weight of amorphous silica, 1.5 parts by weight of an antioxidant, and 1 part by weight of carbon black, was added to a Hobart mixer and mixed until a uniform blend was achieved. The blend was then introduced to a standard extruder to which was attached a sheeting die. The temperature profile along the length of the extruder from the feed end to the die end progressively decreased from 325 F. to 305 F. and the die temperature held at 300 F. The extruded sheet was then immersed in hexane for l hour to extract the oil. The extracted sheet was 0.135 inches thick and weighed 0.90 lbs. per sq. ft.

The microporous sheet produced in Example I was tested for airborne sound attenuation properties according to the procedure and specifications of ASTM E90-66T. In this test, the sound insulating property of a partition element is expressed in terms of the sound transmission loss. The sample to be tested is mounted as a 4'X8 partition between two reverberation rooms, one of which, the source room, ,contains one or more sound sources. The rooms are so arranged and constructed that the only significant sound transmission between 5 them is through the test specimen. The traitsmission loss is the difference expressed in sound of sound incident on the test partition to the sound power transmitted through and radiated by the partition. Measurements are made in a series of frequency bands. Table I gives the results obtained in three specific tests of the sheet prepared in Example I. For comparative purposes, a lead sheet having a thickness of 0.150 inches and a weight of 0.98 lbs. per sq. ft. was subjected to the same three tests.

in Test I, the material to be tested is employed as the partition in the form of a free hanging sheet. The sheet was fastened to wood stops that had been attached to the test opening on the receiving room side. The joint between the perimeter of the test sheet and the test opening was sealed with a flexible mastic. I

In Test II, the material is tested as part of a simulated floorceiling assembly. The simulated floor assembly used as the partition consisted of a 5/8 inch plywood floor, 2 by 8' wood joints spaced 16 inches o.c., ceiling side, 3/8 inch thick gyp-v sumboard nailed to the joints with U2 inch thick acoustical tile glued in a typical manner. The material to be tested for sound attenuation is placed adjacent the plywood. For comparative purposes, the assembly is first tested without the test material adjacently placed.

in Test III, the material is tested in a'simuIated wall assembly. In this test, the partition consisted of U2 inch thick gypsum board on both sides of 2'X4 wood studs placed l6 inches o.c. The material to be tested is placed behind gypsum board on one side only and held in place by the board. For 35 purposes of comparison, the assemblyis first tested without the test material included.

A single figure rating, the Sound Transmission Class, of the performance of the materials tested in the above tests was calculated from the transmission loss data, according to the 40 method described in Determination of Sound Transmission Class (RM 14-2)," American Standard Acoustical Terminology, 51.1, American Standards Association. in this method, the sound transmission loss values at the test frequencies centered between 125 and 4000 Hertz are compared with 45 those of a reference contour (the STC contour). The Sound Transmission Class for each of the materials tested in each test is reported i Table I.

From the results shown in Table I it can be seen that the sheet of the invention functions ideally as a sound attenuator.

50 In Test 1, wherein the materials were tested as free hanging sheets, the sheet of the invention exhibited a Sound Transmission Class rating very nearly that exhibited by the lead sheet,

TABLE I Sound transmission loss 1 Test II Test III Sheet of Lead Sheet of Lead Control Ex. I sheet Control Ex. 1 sheet 17 20 19 17 19 21 19 22 21 17 21 19 24 25 25 26 28 24 28 33 23 32 33 31 33 39 37 37 39 39 38 41 40 34 37 43 41 42 42 40 40 43 43 43 44 43 45 47 46 45 46 45 48 48 48 46 48 47 48 48 51 48 40 49 50 51 52 49 52 52 51 54 54 50 53 53 52 56 56 50 54 54 b5 59 58 46 b3 52 b5 59 58 44 57 49 54 60 59 46 53 52 56 60 60 a 50 56 43 46 45 41 45 43 1 According to AS'IM 1290-661. (1; ficcordlng to ASTM 1290-661 and American Standard Acoustical Terminology. American Standards Assn.

even though the sheet of the invention was lighter in weight. In

EXAMPLES ll -V Four sheets having the thicknesses shown in Table II were prepared using the ingredients and procedure of Example 1 except that the extraction step was omitted. Two adjacent sam- A direct comparison of the sound attenuation performance data listed in Table II of the extracted and unextracted sheets of Examples ll-V can be obtained by plotting the sound transmission loss data obtained for both the extracted and unextracted sheets as a function of the weight per square foot of the sheet at selected frequencies'The graphs shown in FIG. 1, 2 and 3 portray the performance of the extracted and unextracted' sheets as a function of their weight per square foot at the frequencies of 400, 800 and 2000 Hertz, respectively.

It is readily seen from FIGS. l-3 that the extracted or porous samples performed equally to, or better than the unextracted or nonporous samples with regards to sound attenuation.

This same performance can also be demonstrated by calcuples, each 12 inches by 12 inches, were cut from each of the 15 latihg the expected sfmhd attenuation Performance of the unextracted sheets and one each of the samples extracted with "acted Sheet accordlhg t9 the mass law and comparing this hexane as in Example I. The weight of each of the unextracted t the actual Performance obtaihed- The difference in d extracted samples i given i T bl [L weight per square foot between the unextracted and extracted samples is measured and the mass law applied to calculate the TABLE I1 decrease in sound attenuation to be expected by the loss (difference) in mass. This calculated loss is subtracted from the measured unextracted sound data to provide sound attenua- 9 tion data of an unextracted sheet having a mass equal to the I extracted samples. The mass law unextracted data, calculated Thickness Unextracted Ext a t d from the measured unextracted data, when compared with the (Mils) (Nonpcrous) (Porous) measured data of the extracted samples obtained above, confirmed that, for all four thicknesses of sample materials the exp II p 9 tracted or porous samples exhibited at least equal, or imgxzs: 8:2? 33: proved, sound attenuation properties over the unextracted or Example v 80 0J6 (156 nonporous samples of equal weight. 1

The porous sheet materials obtained in the following Examples also exhibit sound attenuating properties: The unextracted and extracted sheets of Examples ll-V were tested for sound attenuation properties in a sound 35 EXAMPLE Vl chamber constructed of 3/4 inches plywood having an internal volume of approximately 53 cubic feet and which is internally A porousfsheet {mghmg 0125 pounds?" square foot was insulated with glass wool. Within the chamber is a speaker enprepared the Ingredients and the procedine of Example closure having an internal volume of approximately 0.5 cubic kggfi g iusfq zfiggg g g gg fi zg g zg tgt g foot. The speaker enclosure is constructed of 3/4 inches 40 th I l p y p plywood with one inch inner wall of sound deadening tile. A e y we cop y section of the speaker enclosure swings open to allow for insertion of the test specimen. The speaker is 8 inch-8ohms. A 7 EXAMPLE signal is generated by an RCA WA'44C signal generator This Ten arts b wei ht of a 01 vin l chloride homo l mer is f thmugh channel Pafayette LA 224T having in inhe ient v iscosity gr 1 062 -1. 160 (Geon lo i e p) is Phfier to t w a 9 whlch the output voltage noted introduced to a Banbury Mixer along with 12 parts by weight A dynamlc mlcrophone 's cenmuy located m the mam body of amorphous silica, 43 parts by weight of lead oxide, 31 parts of the smind chamber separated from the speaker by the by weight of dioctyl phthalate plasticizer, 1 part by weight cartest q p' The mlcmphone detects the speaker mitput bon black and 1.5 parts by weight of an antioxidant. The inand dehvers voltage h secfmd chapel of the amphfiier' gredients were mixed at a temperature of about 250 F. until The Z 'Q I g g i i ms; homogeneous. Thehomogeneous mass wa s formed into a thin woun resis or across w c e ou u vo ge is mom re with a Simpson AC VT VM (.001 to 300 volts) and an oscil sheet weighing 0.46 pounds per square foot ona roll mill. loscope for wave form observation. Signals are generated at selected frequencies of 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 2000 and EXAMPLE vm 4000 hertz. The drop in decibels of the signal as it passes 115 parts by weight of natural rubber are uniformly mixed through the test specimeniscalculated asfollows: with 58 parts by weight sulfur, 6 parts by weight of stearic 20 log acid, 250 parts by weight of silica gel, 215 parts by weight where V,. is the voltage across mike output, with no test water and 257 parts by weight of lead oxide and the uniform specimen and V, is the voltage across mike output with the 60 mix molded into a sheet at a temperature of 275 F. The sheet test specimen. The loss in sound transmission for each sample was then heated to a temperature of 220 F. to evaporate the tested at the various frequencies is shown in Table [11. water.

TABLE 111 Sound transmlsslonLoss (db) I Example I Example III Example IV Example V Frequency (H2) Ext. Non-ext. Ext. Non-ext. Ext. Non-ext. Ext. Non-ext.

4 4 11. 5 12. 5 12. 9 15 3. 5 19 4.8 5. r 12. 9 14 17. 0 17. 9 21. 3 21. 5 4. s 6. 1 12.1 14. 6 16.1 18. 6 19.1 20. 9 4.9 (10 12.8 16 17.5 17.9 19.3 20 r. 3 7. 9 17. 8 19.5 21. 8 22. 9 23. 2 24. 5 13 15 23. 5 25. 9 27.1 28. 2 29 29. 9 24. 7 26 32.5 33 33 33.4 34 33. 7

3. The barrier ofclaim 6 ivherein said polymeric material is a polyolefin.

4. A sound attenuating barrier comprising a layerof construction material, and, adjacent said layer, a microporous sheet comprising a resilient normally solid polyolefin containing about 20 to percent by weight of finely divided lead particles uniformly dispersed therein, said pores being interconnecting and having an average diameter in the range of about 0.01 to l microns and said sheet having a void volume in the range of about 30 to 70 percent. 7

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2999041 *Feb 4, 1957Sep 5, 1961Griffolyn Company IncReinforced tear-resistant material
US3046172 *Mar 26, 1959Jul 24, 1962Standard Products CoSpongy elastomeric materials and methods and products used in the manufacture of the same
US3072582 *Apr 1, 1959Jan 8, 1963Gen Tire & Rubber CoPolyether-urethane foams and method of making same
US3112283 *Sep 10, 1959Nov 26, 1963Chrysler CorpMolding composition comprising unsaturated monomer modified polyester and filler
US3160549 *Dec 29, 1960Dec 8, 1964Minnesota Mining & MfgVibration damping structures
US3215225 *Nov 29, 1961Nov 2, 1965Korfund Dynamics CorpLaminated acoustic panels with outer metal layers, fibrous core and viscoelastic damping layer
US3253947 *Mar 3, 1961May 31, 1966Porter Co Inc H KFlexible sound attenuating material
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3963881 *May 29, 1973Jun 15, 1976Thermo Electron CorporationUnidirectional condenser microphone
US4969535 *Jun 26, 1989Nov 13, 1990Grumman Aerospace CorporationAcoustic liner
US5014815 *Jun 26, 1989May 14, 1991Grumman Aerospace CorporationAcoustic liner
US5025888 *Jun 26, 1989Jun 25, 1991Grumman Aerospace CorporationAcoustic liner
US5648941 *Sep 29, 1995Jul 15, 1997Hewlett-Packard CompanyTransducer backing material
US6051913 *Oct 28, 1998Apr 18, 2000Hewlett-Packard CompanyElectroacoustic transducer and acoustic isolator for use therein
US6171689 *Jan 15, 1999Jan 9, 20013M Innovative Properties CompanyFormed by thermally induced phase separation from a diluent in combination with a thermoplastic polymer and a flame retardant; useful in clothing, wall or roofing barriers, optical films in electronics and electrical insulation
US7384686 *Mar 17, 2003Jun 10, 2008BollorePorous composite product in particular with a high specific surface preparation process and electrode formed of a porous composite film for an electro-chemical assembly
US7503430Sep 7, 2006Mar 17, 2009Usg Interiors, Inc.Reduced dust acoustic panel
EP0014085A1 *Jan 21, 1980Aug 6, 1980Glynwed Group Services LimitedAir compressor equipment
Classifications
U.S. Classification181/290, 428/317.9, 428/328, 428/314.8
International ClassificationG10K11/00, G10K11/16
Cooperative ClassificationG10K11/165
European ClassificationG10K11/165