Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3671794 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateJun 20, 1972
Filing dateMar 20, 1970
Priority dateMar 24, 1969
Also published asDE2013888A1, DE2013888B2
Publication numberUS 3671794 A, US 3671794A, US-A-3671794, US3671794 A, US3671794A
InventorsDoi Ken-Ichi, Nakamura Hiroto, Sato Akira
Original AssigneeMatsushita Electronics Corp
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Shadow mask support mechanism for a color television image tube
US 3671794 A
Abstract
A shadow mask support means including three leaf springs for supporting a rectangular shadow mask on a face panel at three sides of a frame of the mask, said three leaf springs having a predetermined relationship with respect to the spring constant and deflection so that, even when the image tube is subjected to a shock load or the shadow mask in thermally expanded, the change in the relative position of the shadow mask and the face panel is minimized.
Images(1)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

United States Patent N akamura et a1.

[54] SHADOW MASK SUPPORT MECHANISM FOR A COLOR TELEVISION IMAGE TUBE [72], Inventors: Hiroto Nakamura; Akira Sato, both of Takatsuki; Ken-ichi Doi, Kobe, all of Japan [73] Assignee: Matsushlta Electronics Corporation,

Osaka, Japan [22] Filed: March 20, 1970 [21] Appl. No.: 21,422

[30] Foreign Application Priority Data March 24, 1969 Japan ..44/24045 [52] U.S. Cl. ..313/85 S, 313/286 [51] Int. Cl. ...H0lj 29/06, HOlj 31/20 [58] Field ofSearch ..3l3/85 S, 269

[56] References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,452,234 6/1969 Lindeman ..3l'3/85 S 1 June 20, 1972 3,454,813 7/1969 bewinson ..313/85 S 3,449,611 6/1969 Schwartz et aL. ....313/85 S 3,492,522 l/1970 Pappadis ..313/85 S 3,524,972 8/1970 Cooper et a1. ..3l3/85 S FOREIGN PATENTS OR APPLICATXONS 790,713 7/1968 Canada ..313/85 S Primary Examiner-Robert Segal Attorney-Stevens, Davis, Miller & Mosher [57] ABSTRACT A shadow mask support means including three leaf springs for supporting a rectangular shadow mask on a face panel at three sides of a frame of the mask, said three leaf springs having a predetermined relationship with respect to the spring constant and deflection so that, even when the image tube is subjected to a shock load or the shadow mask in thermally expanded, the change in the relative position of the shadow mask and the face panel is minimized.

1 Claim, 5 Drawing Figures PATENTEDJum m2 M M W 4 A. mm m K. 00/

INVENTORS ATTORNEYS SHADOW MASK SUPPORT MECHANISM FOR A COLOR TELEVISION IMAGE TUBE The present invention relates to a mechanism for stably supporting a rectangular shadow mask of a color television image tube on a face panel at three points.

In a color television image tube, three shadow leaf springs are normally used for resiliently supporting a rectangular shadow mask on a face mask. Each of the leaf springs comprises a pin projecting from the inner surface of the side wall of the face panel, and a leaf spring having one end engaging said pin and the other end secured to the outer surface of the side wall of the mask frame. Three such leaf springs are disposed with suitable spacings in a space between said frame and said face panel. The spacings of the leaf springs have a great influence on the supporting characteristics of said mask on said face panel, and in some instances the leaf springs cannot withstand the shock load applied from outside. Further, in some cases, the center of the shadow mask is displaced or the mask is rotated about a point at or near the center thereof when it is thermally expanded.

Therefore, an object of the present invention is to minimize the relative displacement between a face panel and a rectangular shadow mask supported thereon at three points even when the image tube is subjected to a mechanical shock load or when the shadow mask is thermally expanded.

The mask support mechanism of the present invention will now be described with reference to a preferred embodiment shown by way of example in the accompanying drawings;

FIG. 1 is a plan view of a mask support mechanism embodying the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a detailed view of a portion of the mechanism shown in FIG. 1;

FIGS. 3a and 3b respectively show vector diagrams representing the relative relationship among three spring forces of the leaf springs;

FIG. 4 is a diagrammatical view showing the spring deflection in the leaf spring.

Referring to FIG. 1, a rectangular face panel 1 is combined with a first leaf spring which is attached to the upper side thereof and which has a pin 11 located on the vertical center line Y-Y of the face panel. A leaf spring 12 engaging the pin 11 at its one end has a spring portion 13 extending from the vertical center line Y-Y toward the right as seen in FIG. 1 and secured at the other end to the outer surface of the side wall of a frame 2 provided in a rectangular shadow mask 3. Therefore, the spring in the first leaf spring acts along a line 14 which intersects the vertical center line Y-Y. On the left and right sides of the panel, there are disposed a second and a third leaf springs and respectively which have pins 21 and 31 respectively located on the same horizontal line X'X'. Springs 22 and 32 which respectively engage with said pins 21 and 31 at respective one of their ends have spring portions 23 and 33 respectively which extend toward the bottom side of the face panel 1 and are secured to the frame 2 at their distal ends. The spring 22 of the second leaf spring 20 acts along a line 24 which intersects a line 34, along which the third leaf spring 30 acts, at a point on the vertical center line Y-Y. in FIG. 1, the reference X-X shows a horizontal center line of the face panel 1.

According to the above described three point support mechanism, the distance by which the horizontal line X'X' is offset from the horizontal center line toward the lower side of the face panel has an important effect on the shock absorbing characteristics of the mechanism. In the past, it has been believed that an excellent characteristics will be obtained for withstanding a shock load acting along the image tube axis or a shock load which will be applied on the tube when it is dropped, if said distance is selected to one-fourth of the vertical side length of the frame 2.

However, according to the inventors, it has been found that, when the spring portions 23 and 33 of the second and the third leaf springs 20 and 30 are arranged so as to intersect a horizontal line X"X' which is located below the horizontal center line X-X and spaced therefrom by a distance equal to one-fourth the vertical side length of the frame, the most ex- 4 cellent shock absorbing characteristics can be obtained.

Further, in addition to the above described locations of the three leaf springs 10, 20 and 30, the direction and the amount of the spring forces acting along the lines 14, 24 and 34 are also important. Assuming that identical leaf springs are used in the mask support mechanism and the spring of each leaf springs develops a spring force of F kg, the spring forces can be represented as in FIG. 3a. These forces will produce a resultant force shown by the reference T and a resultant moment shown by R in FIG. 3b, both the resultant force and moment being applied to the shadow mask 3. These forces will cause a temporary or permanent deviation of the location of the mask 3 when the temperature of the mask 3 is increased, with the result that the color purity of the image tube will be adversely affected.

The present invention aims at eliminating said undesirable deviation of the mask location, while at the same time, obtaining a sufficient shock absorbing effect.

When the second and the third leaf springs 20 and 30 having springs of F kg are arranged with the angle 0 in FIG. 2 selected to a nominal value of 714 and the spring force of the first leaf springs 10 is determined to about 0.25 F kg which is equal to 2 F sin 714 the spring forces of the three leaf springs are substantially balanced and the resultant force T and the moment R can be reduced to a minimum value. The spring of the first leaf springs 10 may be designed to have a spring force of 0.25 F kg by reducing the spring constant (ln an elastic system obeying the Hooke law, the magnitude of the applied force F, and the elongation x are related by F kx, where the constant k is called the spring constant; i.e. spring constant force/deflection force/elongation). This design may be effective to minimize said deviation of the thermally expanded mask. However, if the spring constant of the first leaf springs 10 is reduced by for example simply reducing the cross-section of the spring, the supporter will become too weak to withstand a shock load which may be applied to the tube when it is dropped. The present invention has been accomplished by noting the fact that the spring force is the product of the spring constant and the deflection and is characterized by the fact that both the spring constant and the deflection are changed to obtain a spring force of 0.25 F.

In FIG. 2, the distance a between the horizontal center line X--X and the horizontal line XX' may be 54 mm for a 20 inch size rectangular image tube. ln this case, in order to make the first leaf springs 10 withstandable to the shock load in the direction of the tube axis, its spring constant must be about 60 percent of those of the second and the third leaf springs 20 and 30. Further, for image tubes of average size including those of 22 inch size, the spring constant of the first leaf springs may be selected to 50 to 60 percent of those of the second and the third leaf springs.

In the mask support mechanism in accordance with the present invention, the spring constant of the first leaf springs 10 is selected to be 50 to 60 percent of those of the second and the third leaf springs 20 and 30 and,, at the same time, the deflection of the spring, that is, the distance b shown in FIG. 4 in the first leaf springs 10 is reduced as compared with those of the other leaf springs 20 and 30 so that the effective spring force of the first leaf springs 10 is reduced substantially to 0.25 F kg. The spring deflection in the first leaf springs may be about 0.42 to 0.5 of those in the second and the third leaf springs and, by this arrangement, both the thermal characteristics and the shock absorbing characteristics of the mechanism for mounting the shadow mask on the face panel are highly improved.

What is claimed is:

l. A mask support mechanism for a color television image tube including a rectangular shadow mask supported on a rectangular face panel, said mechanism comprising a first leaf spring, one distal end of said spring engaging a pin provided on the upper side of said rectangular face panel and providing a spring portion extending from. a vertical center line toward one side only of said panel and secured at the other end to the outer surface of the side wall of a frame provided in said rectangular shadow mask, and a second and a third substantially identical leaf springs having ends engaging pins provided on the left and right sides of said panel, and each other end of said first, second and third springs being secured to the outer surface of the side wall of a frame provided in a rectangular shadow mask, a horizontal line connecting the spring portions of said second and third leaf springs being spaced from the horizontal center line of said face panel by a distance equal to one-fourth the shorter side length of the shadow mask frame, said shadow mask being resiliently supported at the inner side of said panel, the spring constant of said first leaf spring being selected to be 50 to 60 percent of those of the second and the third leaf springs and the spring deflection of the first leaf spring being determined to be small as compared with those of said second and third leaf springs, so that in the case of thermal expansion of the shadow mask the resultant force of the spring forces of said first, second and third leaf springs is substantially reduced.

III I! i

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3449611 *Jun 22, 1966Jun 10, 1969Nat Video CorpSuspension system for color television tube mask
US3452234 *Sep 15, 1967Jun 24, 1969Motorola IncMounting for a shadow mask assembly in a color cathode ray tube
US3454813 *Sep 12, 1968Jul 8, 1969Admiral CorpMask-frame captivator
US3492522 *Aug 15, 1967Jan 27, 1970Zenith Radio CorpShadow mask supported by v-shaped springs having apices directed toward gun
US3524972 *Oct 5, 1967Aug 18, 1970Nat Video CorpShadow mask bimetal strip means with motion-limiting bumper
CA790713A *Jul 23, 1968Philips NvCathode-ray tubes for reproducing colour television images
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4012661 *Aug 22, 1973Mar 15, 1977General Electric CompanyThermal compensation for color television picture tube aperture mask
US5502349 *Jul 5, 1994Mar 26, 1996Goldstar Co., Ltd.Elastic member for supporting shadow mask of color picture tube
US5982084 *Mar 30, 1998Nov 9, 1999Matsushita Electronics CorporationColor cathode ray tube
US6057641 *May 19, 1994May 2, 2000Sony CorporationCathode-ray tube with fixing springs for color selection electrode
US6320305 *Dec 18, 1998Nov 20, 2001Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaColor cathode ray tube with shadow mask
Classifications
U.S. Classification313/406, 313/286
International ClassificationH01J29/07
Cooperative ClassificationH01J29/073
European ClassificationH01J29/07B