|Publication number||US3683161 A|
|Publication date||Aug 8, 1972|
|Filing date||Sep 8, 1970|
|Priority date||Sep 8, 1970|
|Publication number||US 3683161 A, US 3683161A, US-A-3683161, US3683161 A, US3683161A|
|Inventors||Walter O Stadlin, Bruce F Wollenberg|
|Original Assignee||Leeds & Northrup Co|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (1), Referenced by (17), Classifications (11)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
United States Patent Stadlin et al.
 COMPUTING ECONOMIC POWER DISTRIBUTION IN POWER TOOLS  Inventors: Walter O. Stadlin, Eagleville; Bruce F. Wollenberg, Chalfont, both of Pa.
 Assignee: Leeds & Northrup Company,
221 Filed: Sept. 8, 1970  Appl. No.: 70,274
 U.S.Cl. ..235/l51.2l,444ll, 307/57  Int. Cl ..G06l 15/56, 006i" l5/O6, H02) 3/06  Field of Search ..235/l5l.2l, 150; 307/57;
[561 References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,400,258 9/1968 Stadlin ..235/l5 l .21
Primary ExaminerEugene 0. Bot:
Assistant Examiner-Edward 1. Wise Attorney-William G. Miller, Jr. and Raymond F. MacKay  ABSTRACT The economic dispatch of generation in intercon nected areas is computed by determining the generation which will cause the incremental cost of power at each of the interarea tie points, as calculated from the interconnected areas. to be equal at the existing load level. A computer having its own loss matrix is utilized in each area. It computes the tie point costs on the basis of cost information sent from the areas interconnected to it, and it also sends its own costs to those areas. In each area the desired generation and net tie line interchange are computed to provide a basis for controlling the area's generation.
6 Claims, 5 Drawing Figures PATENEBAUG 8 1972 SHEET 1 BF 5 FIG. 1
INVENTORS' WALTER 0. STADLIN BRUCE F. WOLLENBERG tum-a... Arfiwzm AGENT PATENTED M1 8 I972 SHEET 2 BF 5 AREA EDC l DO N TIMES TO CONVERGE FIG. 2
DO FOR E ACH LOSS MATRIX INPUT DO M TIMES l 2P =EP =0 A ed A id 4 00 FOR EACH SOURCE OF POWER GENERATOR TIE UNE 2P =2P +P A qd A gd gd STORE P AND EP STORE u HSPm PM Pt ,P| 1 OR PH f rd m+ ra 29. bPg 1 PM AND SP" CONTNUE AX 'QSAX CONTlNUE 'ERROR sxwb/ com-mus PATENTEDAUB 81972 3.683.161
sum 5 0r 5 AREA EDC 52 no N mass TO convenes 84 CONTINUE as 9e P P Y CONTINUE cou1'muz v N u ERROR EXIT To HM COMPUTING ECONOMIC POWER DISTRIBUTION IN POWER TOOLS BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to a method for the computation of the allocation of generation as between a plurality of generators interconnected in groups to form separate areas with the areas in turn being intercom nected by tie lines to form a power pool. More particularly, this invention relates to a method for computing the generation required of each of the generators making up the separate areas to establish for the power pool a minimum total cost for the power generated by the pool for the purpose of obtaining maximum economy of operation while meeting the load requirements of the pool and its scheduled interchange with other pools.
In the past, the computation of the allocation of generation among the separate generators of the interconnected areas of a pool has involved the use of computers which utilize a loss matrix or similar method for introducing into the computations the effect of transmission losses. The parameters of the matrix related to the overall computation problem involved in the pool as contrasted with a loss matrix which utilizes parameters which related only to the particular losses involved in the individual areas of the pool. Thus, in earlier systems such as the system shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,400,258, issued to one of the present inventors on Sept. 3, 1968, means have been described for the calculation of the desired generation for each of the generating stations of the separate areas of the pools but by virtue of the incorporation of the constants relating to the transmission losses of the pool in a single matrix in addition to the incorporation of the loss constant dealing with a particular area in still another matrix there has been a duplication of computational facilities in order to make possible the separate and individual operation of the areas in the pool with predetermined tie line flows between them as compared with the operation of the pool with an economic distribution of the total generation so that the tie line flows between the areas carried out the economic distribution desired.
In some systems for computing the generation at the various generating stations of each area as well as the power interchange between the areas, it has been necessary to utilize means for dealing with a plurality of interconnecting tie lines between some of the individual areas by calculating an average condition for those tie lines as, for example, in the system described in Economic Control of Interconnected Systems" by Leon K. Kirchmayer, published by John Wiley & Sons, I959.
Still other systems for calculating the values of generation and the interchange power between the areas have been disclosed, for example, in the Kirchmayer US. Pat. No. 3,117,221, issued Jan. 7, 1964, wherein there has been incorporated a computation not only of the transmission losses but also of the cost of wheeling power through an area.
It is, therefore, an object of this invention to provide a novel method for determining the desired generation for the generators in the separate areas interconnected to form a power pool so as to constantly maintain maximum economy of operation for the pool consistant with restrictions on generator and tie line loading.
A further object of this invention is the provision of a novel method for determining the desired generation for the generators of the stations in the separate interconnected areas of the pool as required for maximum economy of operation of the pool while taking into account the transmission losses on the tie lines interconnecting the areas.
A still further object of this invention is the provision of a novel method for establishing signals representing the desired generation for the generators making up the pool as may be required for satisfying the load of the pool while taking into account the transmission losses on tie lines between the areas with the use of a separate computer for each of the areas.
Still another object of this invention is the provision of a means for computing the economic distribution of total generation in a power pool for maximum economy without the utilization of a pool loss matrix or its equivalent.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In carrying out the present invention there is provided a method for automatically computing the economic distribution of the generation in a group of areas interconnected for the transmission of power therebetween when at least two of these areas are interconnected by a plurality of transmission lines. This method comprises several steps of which the first is the automatic computation of the incremental cost of power at a boundary point on each tie line between that area and the areas interconnected thereto, based on the incremental generation costs and the incremental transmission losses in that area. The method also includes the step of automatically computing in each of the areas interconnected thereto a second incremental cost of power at the same boundary points mentioned above based on the incremental cost of power generation and the incremental cost of transmission losses in the interconnected areas. In addition, there is included the step of automatically comparing for each area, the first and second incremental costs calculated for each of the boundary points as set forth above and then as a final step there is an automatic computation from the results of this comparison, of the magnitude of the power generation required from each of the power sources and the net interarea tie line interchanges on each of the ties between the respective areas as needed to maintain equality between the sum of the total actual generation and the total actual interchange of the area and the sum of the desired generation and the desired tie line interchanges as computed.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. I is a diagrammatic showing of a power pool showing the tie lines between the individual areas and the communications channels needed between the computers of the areas.
FIGS. 2, 3, 4 and 5 are block diagrams of parts of the algorithm to be followed by a digital computer in making the necessary calculations.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS FIG. 1 shows a power pool 10 which includes 4 interconnected areas, namely areas I, 2, 3 and 4. Area I is shown as having transmission lines 12 and 13 connecting it to area 2 for the interchange of power therebetween. Area 1 is also connected by transmission lines 14 and 15 to areas 4 and 3, respectively. There is also shown a plurality of tie lines 16 and 17 connecting area 4 and area 3 for interchange of power between those areas while the tie line 18 connects area 3 to area 2. Areas 1, 2 and 4 have tie lines 20, 21, 22 and 23 which connect to other power pools. For example. tie lines 20 and 21 connect area 1 to an external power pool and the tie lines 22 and 23 connect areas 2 and 4 respectively to other pools.
As shown in FIG. 1, each of the areas may incorporate a number of generation sources such as the generator 24 whose actual output P is supplied to a station or generator bus 26 at which point the incremental cost of generating power C may be determined as will be explained subsequently. The power generated in each of the areas is absorbed by the loads of the areas (not shown) and is also transmitted as required over the individual tie lines interconnecting each individual area to other areas of the pool.
Each of the areas of the power pool is shown as having a computer such as the computer 31 of area 1 whose purpose is to compute the desired generation, P for each of the generators in the area as well as the desired net tie line interchange 2 for that area. This computation in each of the computers 31-34 is preferably made by a digital computer in accordance with a program following the algorithm to be described subsequently. This computation requires that each of the computers have as an input the measured value of the actual generation for each of the generators in the particular area P as well as a measured value for the actual tie line flow over the tie lines into the particular area P In addition to these measured values, which are made in the particular area in which the computer is located (the local area), the computer of each area must receive from the computer of each area to which it is interconnected (the foreign areas) the following information based upon values computed during the last economic dispatch computation made by the computers of the foreign areas:
P,],= the tie line power flow over each tie line to the local area from a foreign area.
C,],= the incremental cost at a tie point on each tie line associated with the flow of the power P,],. g :]r=IhG rate of change of the incremental cost of power flow over each tie line with changes in tie line power flow evaluated in the region of Pd,
In addition it will be necessary to introduce into the computers 31-34 measured values of the sum of the tie line interchanges between the particular area and the interconnected areas of the pool 2P which for area 1 in pool 10 of FIG. 1 is the sumriiation of the tie line flows over the ties 12-15. Also, it is necessary to sum up the tie line flows to other pools as, for example, by measuring P which in FIG. 1 is shown as including the measurement of the tie line power flow over the ties 20-23.
As will be described subsequently, it will be necessary to calculate the incremental cost C, of power at the tie points on the interarea ties such as shown on tie line 12. The points at which these costs may be calculated can be at a particular bus to which the tie is connected or at other points, wherever it is convenient for purposes of power system operation.
It will be noted that each of the computers 31-34 has communication channels shown by dashed lines interconnecting the computers in the areas which are interconnected by tie lines. Over the communication channels 41, 42 and 43 the necessary information is sent from the respective computers 32, 33 and 34 to computer 31 while over the channels 41 and 42 similar information is sent back from computer 31 to computers 32 and 33. The communications over channel 43 supplies information between computer 34 and computer 31. Computer 34 is in the reference area, namely area 4. Communications channels 46 and 47, respectively, connect the computers 34 and 33 in one case and 33 and 32 in the other case with communications over both channels going in both directions. Thus, as will be evident from FIG. 1, it will be necessary to have communication channels between all areas which have interconnecting tie lines between them for the purpose of interchanging the information described above.
Fundamental economic theory has demonstrated that the incremental cost (dollars/MWh) at any point on a power system must be the same when computed from all connecting areas for the system to be in economic balance. This principle has been applied to generators within an area as, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 2,836,730 issued to E. D. Early on May 27, 1958 and U.S. Pat. No. 2,836,731 issued to W. G. Miller, Jr. on May 27, I958. Likewise, the principle can be applied to the interchange among areas as illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 3,l l7,22l issued to L. K. Kirchmayer on Jan. 7, 1964 and also illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 3,400,258 issued to W. O. Stadlin, one of the present inventors, on Sept. 3, [968. Further theoretical background for this proposition may be found in the previously mentioned publication Economic Control of Interconnected Systems," by Leon K. Kirchmayer.
For control of power interchange between areas of an interconnection to be advantageous to the areas, it is necessary for the incremental costs of power at the boundary of interconnected areas to be the same when it is calculated from either of the interconnected areas. In general an area's incremental cost at the boundary will increase with increased power flow out of the area because of the necessity for increasing its total generation. For the purposes of the computations described herein, the functional relationship between the incremental cost and the tie line power flow can be considered monotonic though it need not necessarily be considered linear. it will be evident that optimum operation of the power pool 10 of FIG. 1 can be defined as that operation which causes an interchange over the tie lines within the pool as well as over the tie lines to external pools as necessary to produce the greatest monetary benefits for the areas of the pool, that is, areas 1-4.
For the purpose of computing in each of the areas the desired generation for each of the generators in the area and the desired power interchange over the ties to the area, it is advantageous to make the computations in the area by treating each of the tie lines to the area in a manner equivalent to the treatment given to a generator in the area. Thus, if a particular area views an interconnecting tie line it has with another area as being equivalent to a generator in its area whose cost function is determined by the interconnected area, then the desired power flow on the interconnecting tie line can be computed by comparing the incremental cost of power at the tie point with the cost of other sources of energy, that is the generators in its own area as well as with the cost at other tie points. Thus, for each area, optimum operation within an area is achieved when all sources are supplying power at the same values of incremental cost of delivered power, that is, the cost of power at the hypothetical load center of the area.
For the purpose of computing in each of the computers 31-34 of FIG. 1 the desired generation of each of the generators of the separate areas as well as the desired net interchange on the tie lines of the areas, the computers may advantageously be programmed so as to carry out the steps of computation set forth in FIGS. 2, 3 and 4, which will now be explained in detail.
In FIG. 2 the economic dispatch computation program is entered periodically, for example, every 5 minutes as indicated by block 60. The first block following the block 60 in the flow chart of FIG. 2 is block 62 which indicates that the iteration carried on by the program through the outer loop of the flow diagram is to be carried on N" times in order to converge to a solution. As indicated by block 64, the computation of the incremental transmission losses associated with power from each of the generators of the area as well as the tie lines of the area oP a P, is calculated for each of the inputs to the loss matrix. This calculation which is carried out in accordance with the equation shown in block 66 is a well known calculation and is referred to, for example, on page 49 of the above-mentioned Kirchmayer book, Economic Control of Interconnected Systems" and on page 75 of "Control of Generation and Power Flow on Interconnected Systems," by Nathan Cohn, published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. in 1966. In the equation in block 66, B,,,,, is the appropriate transmission loss coefficient while B is the transmission loss associated with zero power from the source being considered while P, represents the output of each of the power sources or transmission lines being considered in computing the transmission losses.
As indicated by the block 68, the computation of block 66 is continued for each of the loss matrix inputs and after the transmission loss associated with each of the inputs is calculated, the program then continues to the step indicated in block 70, namely the setting of A, to 8 and the setting of All, to 4, A, being the incremental cost of power delivered to the hypothetical load center of the area in which the computation is being made. The values 8 and 4 for A, and AA, respectively are to be considered as typical and may be altered to extend or contract the range of It, in the solution. For example, if we assume that the particular program being discussed is being carried out by computer 31 of FIG. 1, then A, the incremental cost of delivered power for area 1.
Having set the value of A, and AA, the next step in the program is to enter a series of computations which are repeated M" times, as indicated by the block 72. The value of M is chosen in accordance with the desired accuracy of solution and may be typically set to 20. These computations include first a setting equal to zero of the total desired generation of the generating sources P as well as a setting to zero of the value of P tha is the sum of the desired tie line flow over all of the tie lines between the areas interconnected to the area for which the computation is being made. These latter settings are indicated in block 74.
Having made the settings indicated in block 74, the program then enters a portion which is repeated for each of the sources of power, where the sources of power include not only the generators but also the interarea tie lines. That repetition of the computations for each of the sources is indicated by block 76 which is followed by a branching point 78 which causes the program to branch to the series of computations indicated in block 80 if the source of power is a generator or to the series of computations indicated in block 82 if the source of power is an interarea tie line. Normally, the computations relating to the generators as indicated in block 80 will be carried out first. These computations include first a computation of the incremental cost at the station or generator bus for the power provided by the generator. That cost is indicated as C, and is calculated as a product of A, (the incremental cost of delivered power in the area) and the quantity (l minus the incremental transmission losses) associated with the generation of the particular generator involved.
The generation desired for the generator being considered is a function of the incremental cost of generation at the generator bus, and for a particular incremental cost as calculated by the previous calculation there will be then an associated generation value P, representing the amount of generation required to provide power at the cost figure C, The next step in the computation is to compare the level of generation associated with the computed cost figure C, with the generator's high and low limits, that is, determine whether P, is greater than or equal to the low limit P, or less than or equal to the high limit P,,,. If P, is beyond one of the limits, then the desired generation P will be set to equal either P or P,,,, depending upon which limit is exceeded; otherwise, the desired generation P will be set to equal P, which was previously computed as the function of the incremental cost C. The value P for a particular generator is then added to the total of the values 2P which have been accumulated as a result of the s me computations for other generators and the new total, P,,,, as a result of this computation will then be avai able for summing with the desired generation calculated for the next generator to be considered. The last step of the computation as shown in block 80 is to store (save) the value P for the particular generator being considered as well as the sum of the desired generations.
Following the computations set forth in block 80, the program then continues as indicated by block 84 until the computations have been done for each source of power, as indicated by block 76. If we assume that all of the generators have been considered and the calculations of the desired generation for each of them has been determined, then the block 78 will cause the computations in block 82 to be made for each of the interarea tie lines.
The computations for the interarea tie lines include first a computation of the incremental cost at the tie point C, which is calculated in a similar fashion to the calculation for the costs at the generator bus except that the incremental loss quantity is computed with regard to the tie line being considered. After the cost C, is computed, it is then necessary to determine the power flow P, over the tie line which will provide the level of power flow associated with the calculated cost C In order to make this calculation, it is necessary to utilize infonnation transmitted from the area at the other end of the particular tie line being considered; thus, as shown by the second equation in block 82, the value of P, is determined by adding to the negative of the tie line flow value P transmitted from the foreign area to which the tie interconnects a quantity which is computed by dividing the difference between the cost at the tie point C, and that which was computed in the foreign area C I]! by the rate of change of the tie line cost in the foreign area, namely DCJ OP,],.
The value of P, is then compared as is done in block 80 with the lower and higher limits set for the tie line, namely P and P,,,, and the desired tie line power flow P is then set equal to P, if P, is within the limits; otherwise it is set equal to the particular limit which is exceeded.
Thus, P the desired power transfer over the tie line being considered, is determined and stored and that value is added to the previously accumulated total P,,, for the tie lines previously considered to get a new tal P which is also then stored for purposes of the next computation relating to the tie line power flow.
Once all of the generators and all of the interarea tie lines have been considered and the associated desired values for the generation of the generators and the power flow over the tie lines has been calculated, the computations carried out by blocks 80 and 82 are not continued and the comparison shown in block 86 is made. There the absolute value of the sum of all of the calculated values for the desired generation of the separate generators in the area and the sum of the desired values of all of the interarea tie lines to the area are compared with the measured total actual generation of the generators of the area and the measured total of the tie line power flows between the areas, and if the comparison gives a value which is not less than a small numbers which is established as a criteria for the accuracy to which the iteration is to be carried, then the program begins a series of steps which are intended to alter the value of A, either in an upper or a lower direction depending upon the direction necessary for convergence of the solution. The next step after that shown in block 86 would be the step shown in block 88 which is carried on as long as the program has not iterated more than M times, as shown by block 72, or in other words as long as the block 89 indicates that the program should continue to iterate the value of A The consideration indicated by the steps shown in block 88 is whether the sum of the total desired generation of the generators in the area and the total desired power flow over the interarea tie lines is greater than the actual generation in the area and the actual power flow over the interarea tie lines. if the desired values are greater than the actual values, then, as shown in block 90, A, is decreased by a value AA The value of AA as computed in block 90 for the next iteration, is computed as one half of the present AA whose value may initially be 4, as indicated by block 70. A, may start at a value of 8 as indicated by block 70. The program then progresses from block to block 72 and another iteration is carried out. If the total desired values for the generation and the interarea tie line flows are not greater than the actual values, then the value for A, is increased by a value AA AA, is altered as in block 90, and the program progresses to block 72 and is continued until the computation converges sufficiently or has been carried out M" times as indicated by block 72.
Should the necessary convergence as tested in block 86 fail to materialize within the M" times that the iteration is carried out, then block 89 will cause the program to transfer to block 94 which will exit from the program and indicate an error. Upon the occurrence of an error, A, will have reached either the upper or the lower value of its range. For the initial value shown in block 70 the range of A, would be zero to sixteen dollars per megawatt hour. An error with a correspondingly high value of A, would be an indication of either too little generating capacity and/or too little tie line capacity.
When the comparison made in block 86 shows that the iteration of A, is completed within the desired accuracy, then the program continues N" times to convergence utilizing for the computation in block 66 the new values computed for the various sources, that is the generators and interarea tie lines as values for P,,,. Actual interarea tie line values P could also be used for P,,,, the choice depending on the convergence characteristics of a particular power system. Once convergence has been reached, the next step will be that shown in block 98, namely a summation of the total desired interchange over the interarea ties 2P with the actual measured interchange over the ties from the area under consideration to external pools, namely P so as to thereby obtain the total net interchange or the area E P Having obtained the total net interchange for the area the next series of steps in the program as shown by FIG. 3 is for the purpose of determining the information to be sent to the interconnected areas relating to the cost of power at the tie points and the rate of change of that cost with changes in tie line power flow. The first step in that determination is the step shown in block where a new value A, is found by summing the A, previously stored with the value AA After that step, the program goes through the series of calculations now to be described for each of the tie lines 1 between the area in which this computer is operating and the other areas within the pool which are interconnected to it.
A series of computations is carried out as shown in block 102. The first calculation involves the computation of a tie point cost which is to be transmitted from the local area to the interconnected area to which the tie connects C,],. That cost is obtained by computing the product of A,,, as obtained in block 100, times the quantity (1 minus the transmission losses over the tie line).
Knowing the cost just calculated, it is possible to compute a fictitious value for the power flow over the tie P" by adding the value P,];, that is the value received from the interconnected area to the quantity obtained by dividing the difference between the local cost C and the cost at the same tie point r]; 88 sent from the other area by the change in cost with respect to the change in tie line flow as determined and sent from the other area, namely 6G,] an], which represents the slope of the cost curve at the interconnected area.
The value P, is then compared with the low limit P and the high limit P and if the value P, is not beyond either of the limits, then the value P which represents a fictitious desired tie line power flow will be set equal to P,'; whereas if P, exceeds one of the limits, P will be set to that limit.
Having a fictitious value P determined by changing the value of A by A) it is then possible to determine a AP by subtracting from the fictitious value P the computed desired tie line flow P and checking to see if that difference is equal to zero, as shown in block 104. If it is not, the computation shown in block 106 is carried out. In block 106 the computation involves a determination of the change in cost at the tie points with changes in tie power flow as determined from the area at which the computer is located, namely OCJ O P,], by multiplying the quantity (1 minus the incremental transmission loss) by the quantity AA and dividing by AP and then subtracting 2 times the constant B (which represents the self constant of the tie as it relates to tie line losses) and also multiplying by M.
if the quantity AP is equal to zero and thus the statement in block 104 is true, then the incremental cost change calculated for the local area, as shown in block 108, is set at a maximum value K and the program proceeds to block 110 where the value for the tie line power flow calculated at the local area P,], is set equal to P and as indicated by the block 112, the computation is then repeated for another tie line.
Once the computation in block 106 is made, the next step after that computation is to detennine whether or not the calculated incremental cost at the tie point, as computed in block 106, was equal or less thanzero, as shown in block 109. If the value was less than or equal to zero, then the incremental cost in the local area would be set to a minimum value of K as shown in block 111 and the program would progress into block 110; whereas if the value of the incremental tie point cost was not equal to or less than zero, the program immediately progresses to block 110 and the value of the incremental tie costs for the local area as computed in block 106 is stored as the incremental cost to be sent to the interconnected area along with the sending of the value Pd, and the value C,],.
From the above description of FIG. 3 it will be evident that by incrementing the value of A, the program has computed a cost figure Cd, representing the cost of the power provided by this area to the tie point when the power flow is at a value Pd, and a comparable incremental change in tie cost 6G,] DE], is also transmitted so that those three items of informationcan be utilized in the interconnected area as a basis for determining the amount of power flow which is desired over the tie line for economic operation.
The above discussion of FIGS. 2 and 3 relates specifically to the computations which would be carried on in the computers in areas 1, 2 and 3 of FIG. 1. Similar computations would be carried on in computer 34 of area 4 with the exception of a few minor changes which will now be discussed. Since area 4 is acting as the reference area, it is necessary to take into account in determining the incremental cost the magnitude of the interchange between the reference area and the power pool and the external power pool to which it may be connected as by the tie line 23. This change will be evident from the modifications of the algorithm shown in FIG. 2 which should be made as indicated in FIG. 4 for the computer 34 of area 4. In FIG. 4 the blocks 98a, 86a and 88a indicate that those portions of the algorithm have been changed, the block 98a being utilized in place of the block 98 of FIG. 2 while the blocks 86a and 88a, respectively, replace blocks 86 and 88 of FIG. 2. It will be noted that the block 98a is placed in a different part of the flow chart as compared with the block 98 of FIG. 2 for it is advantageous to make the calculation set forth in block 980 prior to the entry of the iterative portions of the program where the value calculated in block 98a is utilized as, for example, in block 860 and 880.
In block 98:: the desired net interchange of area 4, that is the net interchange over the interconnecting tie lines 14, I6, 17 and 23, X P is computed as the value P representing the actual total net interchange between pool 10 and the external pools as measured over the interconnections 20, 21, 22 and 23 minus the quantity ZQ P which represents the sum of the desired interchange values computed in the foreign areas, that is, the areas interconnected to area 4 and transmitted to area 4 for this computation over additional communication channels not shown in FIG. 1.
Between block 980 and block 86a, the steps of the computation necessary in area 4 are the same as those previously described for the other areas.
In area 4, the determination as to whether or not the incremental cost iteration has been completed is based upon the absolute value of the desired generation of area 4 plus the desired net interchange of area 4 minus the actual generation of area 4 and also minus the actual net interchange of area 4. As shown in block 86a, that absolute value is compared with e and if it is not less than e, the iteration of A, continues as stated in block 89 and the test shown in block 88a is made.
In block 88a the test comprises the comparison of a quantity which is a sum of the desired generation as computed for area 4 and the desired tie line interchange as computed for area 4 with the respective actual values for those quantities. The program then proceeds in a similar fashion as described with regard to FIG. 2.
The above discussion of FIG. 4 relates specifically to the computations which would be carried on in the computers in area 4 of FIG. 1. Different computations could be carried on in the computer 34 of area 4 when it is desirable to eliminate the need for additional communication channels by making the minor changes which will now be discussed. The calculations shown in blocks 86 and 88 would be varied from those shown in FIG. 2 and instead would be as shown in FIG. 5, wherein the block 86b and the block 88b respectively replace the blocks 86 and 88 of FIG. 2. As shown in block 8612, the test made involves the comparison of the sum of the desired generations as calculated, namely ZP with the sum of the measured generations of the area generators P If the absolute value of the difference is less than c, then the next step in the computation would be carried out by block 96 as indicated in FIG. 2; whereas otherwise the next step would be carried out by block 89 which continues the computation by carrying out the comparison shown in block 8812 where the value P is compared to the value P to see if it is greater than that value. In accordance with the results of that comparison the value A, is either increased or decreased as previously explained and as set forth in blocks 90 and 91 of FIG. 2.
Under some conditions it is advantageous to utilize in the pool a computer, at one area only, which acts as a master computer and which receives information from each of the areas of the pool indicative of the actual generation of each of the generators in those areas as well as the tie line flows. With that information this master computer can compute the desired generation values for each of the generators of the separate areas as well as the desired flow over the individual tie lines and that information can be transmitted to the respective areas as well as being utilized in the master computer. Basically, this arrangement allows for the use of one master computer without the necessity of using a loss matrix for all of the tie lines in the pool. it will be evident to those skilled in the art that either of the systems described in detail, namely for each of the areas with their own computer or with systems described with a master computer or satellite computer at the other areas, could be used depending upon which would be most advantageous for the particular pool involved.
in conjunction with the computations set forth above, each of the areas desirably incorporates a load frequency control system which will effectively modify the generation of the generators in the area in accordance with the computed desired values. The load frequency control system may be operated as a permissive control system utilizing the computed (desired) net interchange of the area as a basis for detennining whether the determination should be increased or decreased. For example, the desired net interchange for the area can be compared with the actual net interchange for the area and the difference can be modified by the existing frequency deviation in the area so as to produce an area control error sometimes known as area requirement which can be utilized as an input to a master controller. The master controller can then produce signals such as pulses of duration corresponding to the magnitude of the error and those pulses can be selectively allowed to modify the setting of the governor motor of the generators in the area in accordance with the relative value of the computed value of the desired generation P for a particular generator as compared with the actual generation 1" of that generator. Such systems are well known and are illustrated in the above mentioned book by Nathan Cohn entitled, Control of Generation and Power Flow in interconnected Systems". Particular reference is directed to that portion of the book following page 103 dealing with Control Executions. P for example, may be used as the base point setting for a generator. Participation settings, which are usually used in conjunction with base points, can be determined on the basis of the units regulating capability and associated economic factors depending upon the nature of the control system desired.
The combination of the computations described by FIGS. 2, 3, 4 and 5 and the simultaneous control of the generators in the several areas is important in that a number of the computations involve the use of actual measured values and when the above mentioned computing procedure is combined with an effective control system operable to carry out the desired economic distribution, the computation will be effective to provide accurate values for the desired generation of each of the generators and the desired net interchange for the areas.
What is claimed is: l. A method of operating a computing system to compute the economic distribution of the load among the power sources in each of a group of areas interconnected for transmission of power therebetween when at least two of the areas are interconnected by a plurality of transmission lines, comprising the steps of automatically computing a first incremental cost of power at a boundary point on each tie line between each area and the areas interconnected thereto, said computation being based on the incremental costs and the incremental transmission losses in that area, automatically computing in each of the areas interconnected thereto, a second incremental cost of power at the same boundary points based on the incremental costs and the incremental transmission losses in the interconnected areas,
automatically comparing for each area the first and second incremental costs calculated for each of the boundary points, and
automatically computing in accordance with the results of said comparisons the magnitude of power generation required from each of the power sources and the net interarea tie line interchange for the respective areas to obtain equality between the sum of the combination of the total actual generation and interarea tie line interchange and the combination of the total desired generation and the desired computed interarea tie line interchange.
2. The method of claim 1 in which the computing system includes a computer for each of the areas to make the automatic computations for the areas.
3. The method of claim 1 in which the computing system carries out all of the automatic computations in a single computer.
4. The method of claim 2 in which the computer in each particular area sends to the computers of each of the areas to which it is interconnected a signal representative of the incremental cost of power at the boundary point of each of the individual tie lines to those interconnected areas for the existing level of incremental cost of delivered power for the area.
5. The method of claim 4 in which the computer in each particular area sends to the computer of each of the areas to which it is interconnected a signal representative of the level of power flow associated with the incremental cost sent to the interconnected areas and signals representative of the rate of change of the incremental cost at each of the tie points associated with said level of tie line power flow.
6. A method of operating a computing system to compute the economic distribution of the load among the power sources in each of a group of areas intercom nected for transmission of power therebetween when at least two of the areas are interconnected by a plurality of transmission lines, comprising the steps of automatically computing a first incremental cost of power at a boundary point on each tie line between each area and the areas interconnected thereto, said computation being based on the incremental costs and the incremental transmission losses in the area involved in computation, automatically computing in each of the areas interconnected thereto, a second incremental cost of power at the same boundary points based on the incremental costs and the incremental transmission losses in the interconnected areas, automatically comparing for each area the first and second incremental costs calculated for each of the boundary points,
automatically computing from the results of said comparison the magnitude of power interchange required on each of the tie lines to obtain an economic interchange of power,
automatically computing in each area an incremental cost for generating power from each source of the area,
automatically computing in accordance with said last-named costs the associated desired generation for each of the sources,
comparing the sum of the combined total generation and total desired tie line flow for the area with the combination of the total actual generation and the total actual tie line flow for the area, and
adjusting the incremental cost of delivered power for the area to bring said sum towards zero.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3400258 *||Nov 29, 1963||Sep 3, 1968||Leeds & Northrup Co||Economic control of power pools|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3913829 *||May 29, 1974||Oct 21, 1975||Lester H Fink||Economic dispatch technique for interconnected power systems|
|US3932735 *||Feb 3, 1972||Jan 13, 1976||Westinghouse Electric Corporation||Method of controlling supply of power|
|US4607325 *||Mar 30, 1984||Aug 19, 1986||Honeywell Inc.||Discontinuous optimization procedure modelling the run-idle status of plural process components|
|US4855922 *||Mar 20, 1987||Aug 8, 1989||Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.||Apparatus and method for monitoring an energy management system|
|US6115698 *||Aug 18, 1995||Sep 5, 2000||Continental Power Exchange, Inc.||Apparatus and method for trading electric energy|
|US6473744||Aug 6, 1999||Oct 29, 2002||Mhc Investment Company||Apparatus and method for trading electric energy|
|US6882904||Nov 17, 2003||Apr 19, 2005||Abb Technology Ag||Communication and control network for distributed power resource units|
|US7288921 *||Jun 25, 2004||Oct 30, 2007||Emerson Process Management Power & Water Solutions, Inc.||Method and apparatus for providing economic analysis of power generation and distribution|
|US7343361 *||Dec 6, 2002||Mar 11, 2008||Siemens Power Transmission & Distribution, Inc.||Apparatus for market dispatch for resolving energy imbalance requirements in real-time|
|US7385300||Mar 13, 2007||Jun 10, 2008||Emerson Process Management Power & Water Solutions, Inc.||Method and apparatus for determining actual reactive capability curves|
|US7474080||Sep 12, 2007||Jan 6, 2009||Emerson Process Management Power & Water Solutions, Inc.||Method and apparatus for providing economic analysis of power generation and distribution|
|US7512540 *||Sep 26, 2001||Mar 31, 2009||Gluck Daniel S||Automated new energy technology consulting and demand aggregation system and method|
|US8504463||Aug 3, 2007||Aug 6, 2013||Geophonic Networks, Inc.||Bidding for energy supply|
|US8527389||Aug 4, 2003||Sep 3, 2013||Geophonic Networks, Inc.||Bidding for energy supply to resellers and their customers|
|US20050285574 *||Jun 25, 2004||Dec 29, 2005||Huff Frederick C||Method and apparatus for providing economic analysis of power generation and distribution|
|DE10009325A1 *||Feb 22, 2000||Aug 23, 2001||Deutsche Telekom Ag||Monitoring power balance in power supply network by transmitting changes in power values to nearest switching centre and forwarding to control center as required|
|WO2001041279A1 *||Aug 16, 2000||Jun 7, 2001||Automated Power Exchange Inc||Method and system of managing ac power networks based upon flow-gate market transactions|
|U.S. Classification||705/412, 307/57, 376/215|
|International Classification||G06Q10/00, H02J3/00|
|Cooperative Classification||G06Q50/06, G06Q10/04, H02J3/00|
|European Classification||G06Q10/04, G06Q50/06, H02J3/00|