Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3697898 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateOct 10, 1972
Filing dateMay 8, 1970
Priority dateMay 8, 1970
Also published asDE2122337A1, DE2122337C2
Publication numberUS 3697898 A, US 3697898A, US-A-3697898, US3697898 A, US3697898A
InventorsBlachier Bruno L, Champeau Andre R
Original AssigneeCommunications Satellite Corp
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Plural cavity bandpass waveguide filter
US 3697898 A
Abstract
A waveguide filter having two cascaded double-tuned cavities which are resonant in two independent orthogonal modes and provide a bandpass response. An elliptic function is obtained from the bandpass microwave filter structure by using a direct-coupling iris which selectively couples identical resonant modes between adjacent cavities.
Images(2)
Previous page
Next page
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

United States Patent Blachier et al.

[54] PLURAL CAVITY BANDPASS WAVEGUIDE FILTER [72] Inventors: Bruno L. Blachier, Rockville; Andre R. Champeau, Bethesda, both of [73] Assignee: Communications Satellite Corpora- I tion [22] Filed: May 8, 1970 21 App]. No.2 35,869

52 Us. 01. ..333/21 A, 333/73 w 51 1m. 01 ..H0lp 1/16, HOlp 7/06, H03h 13/00 [58] Field of Search ..333/73, 73 C, 73 W [56] References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS Currie ..333/73 W Kinzer et al ..333/73 W 1451 Oct. 10,1972

Fox ..333/73 W 2,432,093 12/1947 Fox ..333/73 w 2,541,375 2/1951 Mumford ..333/73 w 2,729,794 1/1956 061m ..333/73 w 2,632,808 3/1953 Lawson ..333/73 w 2,518,092 8/1950 Sunstein ..333/73 Primary Examiner-Herman Karl Saalbach Assistant Examiner-Wm. H. Punter Att0rney.l. Frank Osha and Alan J. Kasper [57] ABSTRACT A waveguide filter having two cascaded double-tuned cavities which are resonant in two independent orthogonal modes and provide a bandpass response. An elliptic function is obtained from the bandpass microwave filter structure by using a direct-coupling iris which selectively couples identical resonant modes between adjacent cavities.

14 Claims, 5 Drawing Figures PATENTEDncr 10 1972 INVENTORS /v0 L. BLACAHEK FYI/DRE ,6. CHHI'IPEHa Vlad A4 ATTORNEYS PLURAL CAVITY BANDPASS WAVEGUIDE FILTER BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The subject matter of the present invention is 5 generally concerned with the use of plural doubletuned resonant cavities to approximate the behavior of complex lumped element microwave filters. More particularly, the invention is a bandpass microwave filter including a plurality of coupled resonant cavities, each of which is tuned to support more than one independent mode of propagation at frequencies within a given pass band. A plurality of irises selectively couple propagating modes in each resonant cavity.

Bandpass filters which are simple, light weight and effective in the microwave region of the frequency spectrum remain in the early stages of development. It is well known that conventional lumped circuit series or parallel resonant elements are impractical in the microwave region because of substantial radiation losses due to the high current densities present at these frequencies. The difficulties in constructing inductances and capacitances having the dimensions required to provide the pass band at a microwave center frequency add to the undesirability of conventional circuitry.

It is well known that at frequencies above a particular cutoff frequency it is possible to achieve propagation of a wave through a microwave transmission medium. The medium is typically a hollow element of circular, rectangular or a square cross section which guides the propagating wave from one point to another with a minimum of distortion and attenuation. The wave transmitted down such a waveguide will typically have a single polarization. However, depending upon the shape of a cross section of the waveguide, the wave may propagate with more than one polarization. Should the wave be confined to a particular length of waveguide it may oscillate at its natural resonant frequencies in more than one mode. A cavity, defined by this length of waveguide, will behave like a conventional resonant circuit and can provide a filtering function equivalent to the lumped element resonant circuit.

Since the single cavity filter may not provide sufficient off-band attenuation to give the desired frequency selectivity, a plural cavity design canbe used to provide this selectivity. The plurality of cavities may be directly coupled together as a series of resonant elements by quarter wavelengths of transmission line tions Microwave Theory and Technique, Volume 17,

No. 12, December 1969 at page 1,108. These dimensional limitations are incompatible with spacecraft or other size or weight limited environments.

A cavity may resonate in more than one independent mode at its natural frequencies. The modes resonating in a waveguide cavity may have an orthogonal orientation, that is, a vertical polarization and a horizontal polarization. By definition two modes which are orthogonal are separated by a difference in polarization and will not experience any mutual interference.

The theory behind single mode filters in waveguides is equally applicable to the dual-mode case in which two orthogonal modes independently resonate in a single cavity. It has been shown by George Ragen in Microwave Transmission Circuits (1964) on page 673 that a single cavity may behave like a two cavity filter. By coupling one of the orthogonal modes to the other orthogonal mode the dual-mode effect may be achieved, provided that each independent mode is properly tuned to the resonant frequency of the desired 0 signal. It follows that if the resonant frequencies of a dual-mode cavity and the coupling between its different modes are adjusted to coincide with the corresponding quantities for a lumped element filter, the behavior of the filter will be approximated by the cavity over a limited frequency band.

Although the use of the dual mode in a single resonant cavity has been known in the prior art, the synthesis of filter response curves based upon plurality of dual-mode cavities has not been taught by the prior art. Furthermore, the selective coupling of identical modes between a plurality of cavities resonating with orthogonal modes has not previously been considered.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention provides a lighter, more compact structure for achieving the bandpass response functions discussed above. The invention uses N physical waveguide cavities which resonate in two independent orthogonal modes and are coupled together to provide the filtering capacity of 2N cavities resonating in a single mode. The coupling is provided by structural discontinuities within the physical cavity. The discontinuity may be a screw mounted in the cavity wall.

One feature of the invention is the use of selective polarization discriminating couplings between the N cavities to transfer energy between identical modes in the coupled cavities. The selective couplings may be polarization discriminating irises, transmission lines or microwave bridge elements.

A further feature of the invention is the use of a phase inversion means in coupled cavities to provide a subtraction capability between identical modes in the coupled cavities. This subtraction capability can provide steep response skirts for the pass band of a filter.

DESCRIPTION THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1a illustrates a filter configuration having two resonant cavities and embodying the principles of the present invention.

FIG. 1b is a drawing of the different electrical field polarizations along the length of the filter shown in FIG. la.

FIG. 2a is a drawing of a typical lumped element 1r network which at low frequencies provides the elliptical function response.

. tion of microwave structure of FIG. la.

FIG. 3 is an illustration of the typical elliptic function response.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT Referring at this point to the drawings, FIG. la illustrates a preferred embodiment of the invention which defines the fundamental principles that distinguish the invention from the prior art. A circular waveguide section 1, which may be typically coupled to a rectangular waveguide at joints 2 and 3, is limited at both ends by reflective plates 4 and 5. The circular section is divided by a third reflective plate 6 which defines two physical cavities 7 and 8. Since, in general, frequency is inversely proportional to wavelength (A) and the resonant frequency of a cavity is proportional to its length, selectivity at the desired center frequency requires that each of the filters physical cavities be typically )t/2 in length.

Each physical cavity is capable of resonating in two independent orthogonal modes at the center frequency of the usable bandwidth of the waveguide. The principles applicable to this type of circular waveguide filter operating in the H mode may obviously be extended to waveguides having square, rectangular or elliptical cross sections which are capable of supporting two or more independent modes at a resonant frequency. However, the circular waveguide filter is preferred due to its better selectivity, lower insertion losses and smaller weight.

The polarization of the resonant orthogonal modes is conventionally defined by horizontal and vertical vectors as shown in FIG. lb which are independent of each other and can propagate within the cavity without interference. If the cavity has perfect symmetry and proper dimensions, both modes will propagate at the same frequency. However, this structural condition is not obtainable in practice, and it is convenient to provide two tuning screws, symmetrically inserted into the cavity along radii which are coincident with the horizontal and vertical vectors of the orthogonal modes, to permit the independent tuning of both modes to the same desired frequency. Tuning screws 9 and 10 are placed in the walls of the first cylindrical cavity 7 to provide a capacitive tuning capacity for the cavity over a portion of the frequency band in the respective vertical and horizontal modes. Tuning screws 11 and 12 are similarly mounted in the walls of cavity 8 to provide a capacitive tuning capacity. All fundamental modes propagating in the filter may thereby be tuned to the same desired frequency. These tuning screws are normally placed at the center of the cavity at a distance of approximately (M4), where electric fields are a maximum and the action of the screws is most effective, and where currents are at a minimum and negligible additional losses are introduced.

Coupling screws 13 and 14 are also mounted into the wall of each of the respective cavities 7 and 8 at the center of the cavity where electric fields are at a maximum. Each screw 13 and 14 provides a means, inside the cavity, which is capable of coupling the electric field from one of the independent orthogonal modes to the other. The screws are oriented along a radius at a 45 angle to the fundamental orthogonal mode vectors to insure maximum coupling from one mode to the other and to provide an identical effect on the frequency of both modes.

It should be obvious from vector analysis that by changing the radial angle of the coupling screw within the cavity, the amount of power transferred from one mode to the other mode will vary as a sinusoidal function of the radial angle. For example, as the radial angle of screw 13 is shifted in the clock-wise direction, about the center axis of the waveguide, the amount of coupling goes to zero when the screw is coincident with the vertical mode. A displacement of screw 13 by from the illustrated position will also result in a maximum coupling, but phase shifted by the couplings will be equal in magnitude but opposite in sign.

Couplingscrew 14 is mounted in cavity 8 at an angle of 45 between the two orthogonal modes and is shifted by 90 from the radial orientation of screw 13. The coupling provided by screw 14 is, therefore, equal to the coupling provided by screw 13 but of opposite sign. As will be shown below, this difference of sign in the two cavities is necessary to achieve the elliptic function response of the filter.

It is not desirable, as a practical matter, to use a coupling screw mounted in a radial direction other than at a 45 angle to the orthogonal mode vectors since the screw would affect the frequency of each orthogonal mode by a different amount and therefore complicate tuning of the two modes by the tuning screws. Since the amount of coupling from one mode to another also depends upon the length of the capacitive coupling structure in the cavity, the degree of coupling is preferably adjusted by varying the length of the coupling screw which extends into the cavity. As is well known in the art, the capacitive coupling effect may also be provided by any equivalent structural discontinuity within the cavity such as a dielectric rod or dent in the waveguide wall.

An input slot or iris l5 and an output slot or iris 16 are provided in the reflective plates 4 and 5 and couple the polarized transmitted wave in a rectangular waveguide to the waveguide filter. Since the wave propagating in a rectangular waveguide is normally polarized in only one direction, a discriminating coupling at the input to the filter is not necessary. FIG. 1b illustrates a vector representation of the input wave V, and the output wave V which are assumed to have a vertical polarization in the rectangular waveguide of the preferred embodiment. Propagation within the cavities 7 and 8 is, however, in the cross polarized mode andreflection of the coupled, horizontal mode at plates 4 and 5 without transmission to the rectangular waveguide is necessary to support resonance in the dual mode.

The geometry and orientation of the coupling slots 15 and 16 are selected to maximize coupling of any incoming and outgoing waves having the proper polarization, but to minimize coupling of other polarizations and to confine the opposite component of the resonating cross polarized waves within cavities 7 and 8. Geometrically, in this particular case, the irises are rectangular slots which are narrow with respect to their length to achieve good polarization discrimination. The

slots are oriented in the waveguide to pass the vertically polarized input and output waves but to reflect the horizontal component of the resonant cross polarized mode within the cavities. Accordingly, the slot lengths are positioned to be normal to the vertically polarized mode and parallel to the horizontally polarized mode.

It should be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that the input structure need not be limited to a rectangular waveguide which transmits waves having a single polarization. Any other kind of transmission line may be used which propagates signals having one or more modes, provided that adequate polarization discriminating coupling at the input is achieved. In addition, other geometries and orientations of the coupling structure at the input and output to the filter may be selected to pass waves having a desired polarization into and out of the resonant cavities and to reflect the undesired components of the orthogonally polarized waves within the cavities.

A third iris 17, located in plate 6 which is transposed transversely in the cylindrical waveguide section 1, inductively couples the two physical cavities 7 and 8. This iris has, typically, a geometrical configuration and an orientation which will selectively couple each of the orthogonal modes resonating in the cavities 7 and 8. As will be explained below, in order to achieve the elliptic function it is necessary that the horizontal mode propagating in resonant cavity 7 be maximally coupled to the horizontal mode propagating in resonant cavity 8 and that some lesser degree of coupling exist between the vertically polarized modes of cavities 7 and 8.

A unique geometrical configuration is shown in FIG. la for the iris 17. The coupling slot can be viewed as two overlapping, horizontal and vertical slots which are symmetrically oriented to coincide with the orthogonal vectors defining the two propagating modes in the respective physical cavities. The dimensions of the slot 17 are selected to provide the desired degree of coupling of the horizontal and the vertical modes. It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that other coupling means such as quarter wave length lines or additional geometrical configurations for the iris 17 may be used to provide the desired degree of coupling between the horizontal and vertical modes in each of the cavities. As an example, since identical modes in each cavity are coupled together, perfect polarization discrimination is not necessary and rectangular or elliptical shapes giving different degrees of coupling between the two modes may be selected. However, the iris structure illustrated in FIG. 1a has been proven to provide the desired independent control over the degree of coupling of the two orthogonal modes.

In order to more fully explain the operation of the present invention, an examination of the electrical field vectors within the cylindrical waveguide filter will now be made by referring once again to FIG. 1b. Assuming that the input polarization is vertical, horizontal coupling slot 15 will transmit the vertical mode V,- to resonant cavity 7. Vector V, will resonate within cavity 7 as mode vector R1 and the energy from the vertically polarized wave R1 will be transferred to the non-interfering horizontally polarized mode R2 by coupling screw 13. The horizontal and vertical signals R1 and R2 will simultaneously and independently propagate within the cavity 7 in the crossed mode as illustrated.

The vertical dimensions of iris 17 are selected to inductively couple the horizontal mode R2 of the electric field existing in cavity 7 to the cavity 8 as horizontal resonant mode R3. Mode R3 will be coupled to the vertical resonant mode R4 by coupling screw 14, resulting in the simultaneous and independent propagation of the crossed modes R3 and R4 within cavity 8. As previously discussed, coupling screw 14 is oriented at a angle to coupling screw 13 and therefore imparts a 180 phase shift to vertical resonant mode R4 with respect to vertical mode R1. As shown in FIG. lb, each of the cavities 7 and 8 have horizontal modes which are identical in phase and magnitude, however, the vertical modes are seen to be 180 out of phase. The horizontal dimension of iris 17 provides a coupling between the vertical mode R1 in cavity 7 and the vertical mode R4 in cavity 8. The coupling of these two modes which are 180 out of phase will provide the desired elliptic function. The coupling of modes R4 and R1 is smaller than the coupling of modes R2 and R3 and will only cancel the frequency response of the filter at the edges of the pass band resulting in the characteristic steep sides and notches of the elliptic filter response as seen in FIG. 3.

The microwave structure shown in FIG. la may be represented by an equivalent lumped element circuit and techniques for converting the functions of a microwave element to a circuit element have been examined in Microwave Transmission Circuits, Volume 9, MIT Radiation Laboratory Series, pp. 661-706. FIG. 2a is a circuit diagram of the classic 1r section which at low frequencies provides the elliptical function response shown in FIG. 3. FIG. 2b is a lumped element filter, derived from the 'rr section of FIG. 2a, which by conventional circuit synthesis techniques is equivalent to the light weight microwave structure of the present invention and provides an identical elliptical function response.

The equivalent circuit, illustrated in FIG. 2b, consists of four parallel tank circuits connected by two inductive couplings and two capacitive couplings. The first section of the physical cavity 7 resonates in mode R1 and R2 and is equivalent to the first resonant parallel circuits and 111 respectively in FIG. 2b. Similarly, resonant circuits 112 and 113 are equivalent to the resonant modes R3 and R4 present in the second physical cavity. The capacitive tuning screws 9 and 10 are equivalent to the capacitors 1 14 and l 15. The coupling between vertical mode R1 of the first physical cavity and horizontal mode R2 of the first physical cavity is equivalent to the capacitive coupling element 1 16. Tuning screws 11 and 12 are equivalent to the capacitors 117 and 118, while capacitive coupling screw 14 is equivalent to the capacitive coupler 1 19. The input and output irises l5 and 16 are inductive devices which are assumed to provide a lossless coupling of the waveguide to the filter; consequently, the two irises are equivalent to perfect transformers 120 and 121 which transfer all power in the input signal to the cavities and from the cavities to the output circuit. Referring at this time to the tank circuit 113 whose resonance is equivalent to resonant mode R4, the input from coupling capacitance 119 is inverted in phase by a crossover circuit 122 which is equivalent to the displacement of the coupling screw by 90. The output of this tank circuit is fed back to the input tank circuit by an inductor 123 which is equivalent to the inductive coupling of mode R4 to mode R1 through the horizontal portion of iris 17. The feedback of this negative resonant signal to the first resonant circuit provides the steep slope and the notches in the elliptical function response.

From the above discussion it should be obvious to one of ordinaryskill in the art that by cascading two cavities resonating in the double mode, the equivalent of a four cavity filter resonating in a single mode will result, accompanied by a substantial reduction in weight; In addition it should be obvious that the principles governing the two-cavity case will apply to N cavities, each operating in a double mode, and that the N double mode cavities will be equivalent to 2N cavities. Filters having an even number of cavities, which embody the present invention,.have been realized in the two and four cavity cases. Computer simulation has shown that the invention may be used in filters having an odd number of cavities as well. Furthermore, the interconnection of identical modes in the N cavity case may obviously be accomplished through the irises of cascaded cavities or may conveniently be facilitated by the direct connection of the cavities by polarization discriminating waveguide bridge elements. As is well known in the art the cavities may be in-line or may be folded to achieve a compact filter structure.

Although the preferred embodiment describes structure for achieving an elliptical function response, the fundamental principles of the invention can be used by one of ordinary skill in that art to achieve the normally flat, the Tchybycheff or other quasi-elliptic function responses.

We claim:

1. A plural cavity waveguide filter comprising,

a. a plurality of waveguide cavities, each resonating at its resonant frequency in a first and a second independent orthogonal mode;

b. first discontinuity coupling means oriented in each of said cavities for intra coupling said first mode to said second mode; I

0. second coupling means connecting selected ones of said cavities for inter coupling like oriented modes in said selected cavities said second coupling means including polarization discriminating means adapted to provide selective inter coupling between like oriented modes in said cavities.

2. The invention as recited in claim 1 wherein said first coupling means is adaptable to provide either an intra coupling having a first phase or an intra coupling having a second phase differing from said first phase by 180.

3. The invention as recited in claim 2 wherein said second coupling means includes a reflective plate directly connecting two of said cavities, said plate including an iris for selectively inter coupling the identical modes in said two cavities. V

4. The invention as recited in claim 1 wherein said filter includes tuning means in each of said cavities for independently tuning each of said modes to the cavity resonant frequency.

5. The invention as recited in claim 4 wherein said second coupling means is a reflective plate having a coupling iris, the dimensions of said iris being selected to provide said selective inter coupling between identical modes.

6. The invention as recited in claim 5 wherein said waveguide cavities are cylindrical waveguide sections and wherein said tuning means includes two adjustable screws mounted in said waveguide sections and coincidently disposed along said independent orthogonal resonant modes.

7. The invention as recited in claim 6 wherein said plurality of cavities include an input and an output cavity, said input cavity being coupled to an input waveguide by a first reflective plate having a polarization discriminating coupling iris, and said output cavity of the filter is connected to'an output waveguide by a second reflective plate having a polarization discriminating iris.

8. The invention as recited in claim 1 comprising N physical cavities resonating in said orthogonal modes whereby said filter is equivalent to 2N physical cavities resonating in a single mode.

9. A waveguide filter having an elliptic function response comprising:

a. a first waveguide cavity resonant in first and second independent orthogonal modes;

b. a second waveguide cavity resonant in said first and said second independent orthogonal modes;

c. tuning means in each of said cavities for independently tuning each of said resonant modes to its resonant frequency;

. coupling means in said first cavity for capacitively intra coupling said first resonant mode to said second resonant mode;

e. coupling means in said second cavity for capacitively coupling said first resonant mode to said second resonant mode and for shifting the phase of said second mode by with respect to said first mode of said first cavity;

f. inductive coupling means for selectively inter coupling said first resonant modes and said second resonant modes in said cavities.

10. An elliptic filter as recited in claim 9 wherein said inductive coupling means physically disposed between said first and said second waveguide cavities.

11. A filter as recited in claim 10 wherein said tuning means comprise two screws, mounted in the wall of each cavity, which are coincident with the vectors of said orthogonal modes.

12. A filter as recited in claim 11 wherein said inductive coupling means is a first reflective plate having a coupling iris whereby the degree of coupling between identical modes in each cavity is selectively adjusted by varying the dimensions of said iris.

13. An elliptic filter as recited in claim 12 wherein said first cavity of the filter is connected to an input waveguide by a second reflective plate having a polarization discriminating coupling iris, and said second cavity of the filter is connected to an output waveguide by a third reflective plate having a polarization discriminating coupling iris.

14. A filter as recited in claim 9 wherein a plurality of said first and second waveguide cavities are connected in cascade and wherein said inductive coupling means includes a first means for directly connecting adjacent cavities and a second means for inter connecting selected cavities.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2432093 *Jul 30, 1942Dec 9, 1947Bell Telephone Labor IncWave transmission network
US2476034 *Jul 16, 1945Jul 12, 1949Bell Telephone Labor IncConformal grating resonant cavity
US2518092 *Jul 24, 1945Aug 8, 1950Philco CorpUltra high frequency band-pass circuits
US2541375 *Jun 4, 1948Feb 13, 1951Bell Telephone Labor IncWave filter
US2632808 *May 8, 1946Mar 24, 1953Fano Roberto MFilter
US2694186 *Jan 4, 1951Nov 9, 1954Bell Telephone Labor IncWave filter
US2729794 *Oct 20, 1950Jan 3, 1956Sperry Rand CorpHigh frequency apparatus
US2890421 *Feb 26, 1953Jun 9, 1959Univ CaliforniaMicrowave cavity filter
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3936775 *Sep 30, 1974Feb 3, 1976Harvard Industries, Inc.Multicavity dual mode filter
US3969814 *Jan 15, 1975Jul 20, 1976Trw Inc.Method of fabricating waveguide structures
US4030051 *Jul 6, 1976Jun 14, 1977Hughes Aircraft CompanyN-section microwave resonator having rotary joint for variable coupling
US4060779 *Dec 27, 1976Nov 29, 1977Communications Satellite CorporationCanonical dual mode filter
US4135133 *May 16, 1977Jan 16, 1979Rca CorporationDual mode filter
US4180787 *Nov 21, 1977Dec 25, 1979Siemens AktiengesellschaftFilter for very short electromagnetic waves
US4218666 *Apr 27, 1979Aug 19, 1980Premier Microwave CorporationDual mode band rejection filter
US4260967 *Mar 26, 1979Apr 7, 1981Communications Satellite CorporationHigh power waveguide filter
US4410865 *Feb 24, 1982Oct 18, 1983Hughes Aircraft CompanySpherical cavity microwave filter
US4489293 *Feb 14, 1983Dec 18, 1984Ford Aerospace & Communications CorporationMiniature dual-mode, dielectric-loaded cavity filter
US4498061 *Mar 5, 1982Feb 5, 1985Licentia Patent-Verwaltungs-GmbhMicrowave receiving device
US4544901 *Jun 11, 1982Oct 1, 1985Agence Spatiale EuropeenneMicrowave filter structure
US4549310 *Mar 29, 1984Oct 22, 1985Rca CorporationCross-polarization corrector for circular waveguide
US4571563 *Jan 23, 1984Feb 18, 1986Agence Spatiale EuropeenneIntegrated microwave filter and method of constructing same
US4724408 *Aug 26, 1986Feb 9, 1988Alps Electric Co., Ltd.Waveguide filter
US4734665 *Jun 23, 1987Mar 29, 1988Ant Nachrichtentechnik GmbhMicrowave filter
US5012211 *Sep 2, 1987Apr 30, 1991Hughes Aircraft CompanyLow-loss wide-band microwave filter
US5349316 *Apr 8, 1993Sep 20, 1994Itt CorporationDual bandpass microwave filter
US5382931 *Dec 22, 1993Jan 17, 1995Westinghouse Electric CorporationWaveguide filters having a layered dielectric structure
US5614877 *Mar 15, 1995Mar 25, 1997Hughes Aircraft Co.Biconical multimode resonator
US5703547 *Feb 11, 1997Dec 30, 1997Cselt- Centro Studi E Laboratori Telecomunicazioni S.P.A.Dual-mode cavity for waveguide bandpass filter
US5731750 *Jan 29, 1996Mar 24, 1998Hughes Aircraft CompanySpherical cavity mode transcendental control methods and systems
US5804534 *Apr 19, 1996Sep 8, 1998University Of MarylandMiniaturization; resonators; tuners; mode coupling
US5867077 *Mar 12, 1997Feb 2, 1999Com Dev Ltd.Temperature compensated microwave filter
US5886594 *May 20, 1997Mar 23, 1999Agence Spatiale EuropeenneCircular waveguide dual-mode filter
US5909159 *Sep 19, 1996Jun 1, 1999Illinois Superconductor Corp.Aperture for coupling in an electromagnetic filter
US6046658 *Sep 15, 1998Apr 4, 2000Hughes Electronics CorporationMicrowave filter having cascaded subfilters with preset electrical responses
US6100703 *Jul 8, 1998Aug 8, 2000Yissum Research Development Company Of The University Of JerusalumPolarization-sensitive near-field microwave microscope
US6137381 *Apr 22, 1999Oct 24, 2000Illinois Superconductor CorporationAperture having first and second slots for coupling split-ring resonators
US6297715Mar 27, 1999Oct 2, 2001Space Systems/Loral, Inc.General response dual-mode, dielectric resonator loaded cavity filter
US6898419 *Apr 30, 2001May 24, 2005Nortel Networks CorporationRemotely adjustable bandpass filter
US8487832Jan 18, 2010Jul 16, 2013The Boeing CompanySteering radio frequency beams using negative index metamaterial lenses
US8493276Nov 19, 2009Jul 23, 2013The Boeing CompanyMetamaterial band stop filter for waveguides
US8493277 *Jun 25, 2009Jul 23, 2013The Boeing CompanyLeaky cavity resonator for waveguide band-pass filter applications
US8493281Mar 26, 2009Jul 23, 2013The Boeing CompanyLens for scanning angle enhancement of phased array antennas
US8659502Sep 13, 2012Feb 25, 2014The Boeing CompanyLens for scanning angle enhancement of phased array antennas
US20100328175 *Jun 25, 2009Dec 30, 2010Lam Tai ALeaky cavity resonator for waveguide band-pass filter applications
DE2754927A1 *Dec 9, 1977Jun 29, 1978Communications Satellite CorpHohlleiterfilter mit mehreren hohlraeumen
EP0104735A2 *Aug 11, 1983Apr 4, 1984Space Systems / Loral Inc.Electromagnetic filter with multiple resonant cavities
EP0788180A2 *Jan 29, 1997Aug 6, 1997CSELT Centro Studi e Laboratori Telecomunicazioni S.p.A.Multi-mode cavity for waveguide filters
EP0788181A2 *Jan 29, 1997Aug 6, 1997CSELT Centro Studi e Laboratori Telecomunicazioni S.p.A.Multi-mode cavity for waveguide filters, including an elliptical waveguide segment
EP0899808A2 *Aug 14, 1998Mar 3, 1999Hughes Electronics CorporationDual mode cavity resonator with coupling grooves
EP1020946A1 *Dec 4, 1999Jul 19, 2000Robert Bosch GmbhCavity resonator with tuning means for its resonance frequency
EP1101121A1 *Jul 8, 1999May 23, 2001Yissum Research Development Company Of The Hebrew University Of JerusalemPolarization-sensitive near-field microwave microscope
WO1988001794A1 *Jul 31, 1987Mar 10, 1988Hughes Aircraft CoDual mode waveguide filter employing coupling element for asymmetric response
Classifications
U.S. Classification333/21.00A, 333/209
International ClassificationH01P1/161, H01P1/20, H01P7/06, H01P7/00, H01P1/208, H01P1/16
Cooperative ClassificationH01P7/06, H01P1/2082, H01P1/161
European ClassificationH01P1/208B, H01P1/161, H01P7/06
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Mar 18, 1983ASAssignment
Owner name: INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SATELLITE ORGANIZ
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:COMMUNICATION SATELLITE CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:004114/0753
Effective date: 19820929