Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3701028 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateOct 24, 1972
Filing dateJul 13, 1971
Priority dateJul 13, 1971
Publication numberUS 3701028 A, US 3701028A, US-A-3701028, US3701028 A, US3701028A
InventorsMarkevich John Anthony
Original AssigneeBell Telephone Labor Inc
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Reduction of harmonic distortion
US 3701028 A
Abstract
Harmonic distortion generated in signal processors is reduced by pre-emphasizing the processor input signal and de-emphasizing the processor output signal.
Images(1)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Unite States Patent Markevich Oct. 24, 1972 [541 REDUCTION OF HARMONIC [561- References Cited DISTORTION UNITED STATES PATENTS [7 1 lnvemofl John Anthony Malkevich, Fair 2,956,153 10/1960 Farlow ..328/167 x 3,014,127 12/1961 Vlasak ..328/167 x [73] Assignee; Bell Telephone Laboratories, lnc r. 3,015,728 1962 Richman ..328/l67 X porated, Murray H111, NJ, 3,059,109 10/1962 Silberbach ..328/ 162 x 3,109,991 11/1963 Ocko ..332/1s x [22] My 1971 3,444,469 5/1969 Miyagi ..332/l8 x 21 Appl. No.: 162,129

Primary Examiner-John S. Heyman 52] US. Cl. ..328/167, 328/162,. 328/171, Guemheret 332/18, 307/237, 307/229 51 1111.01. ..H03b 1/04 [571 ABSTRACT [58] Field of Search ..328/16S, 167, 171, 162; Harmonic distortion generated in signal processors is reduced by pre-emphasizing the processor input signal and de-emphasizing the processor output signal.

4 Claims, 3 Drawing Figures PATENTE'num 24 m2 3.701. 028

FIG. I

I0 30 so u f f 55 SIGNAL 4 FIG. 2

ace F 335 336 T 334 337 500 :00 I 339 520 336 M333 332 530 I our 7 OPER :63 J AMP FIG. 3

. OUT I LOWER CL N6 I L L IN I i UPPER k a CLIPPING "1 RANGE INVENTOR J A. MARKEV/CH ATTORNEY 1 REDUCTION OF HARMONIC DISTORTION BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates generally to improving the operation of harmonically distortive signal processors and particularly a method and arrangement for reducing the harmonics generated by the operation of such processors.

An harmonically distortive signal processor is an electrical circuit or system which, ideally, provides an output signal comprising only frequencies present in the input signal thereto but which, as a result, for example, of nonlinearities in the processor, generates harmonies of the input signal in addition to the desired (ideal) output signal. Illustrative of such a processor is a center clipper used, for example, to substantially remove low level noise accompanying a speech signal, but which use generates harmonics of the speech waveform in the process, thereby distorting the speech.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a method and arrangement for reducing the harmonic distortion of signals processed in harmonically distortive signal processors generally, and in center clippers in particular.

The preceding and other objects are achieved by preemphasizing the processor input signal and deemphasizing the processor output signal. More specifically, pre-emphasis of the input signal is provided in a network having a positive-slope frequency response curve. De-emphasis of the output signal is provided in a network having a negative-slope frequency response curve.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS A clear understanding of the invention and of the preceding and other objects thereof may be gained from a consideration of the following detailed description and drawings, in which:

FIG. I is a block diagram illustrating the invention;

FIG. 2 is a center clipping arrangement which embodies the principles of the invention; and

FIG. 3 is the transfer characteristic of the center clipper shown in FIG. 2.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION FIG. 1 shows an arrangement for reducing harmonic distortion created by center clippers, nonlinear amplifiers and certain other electrical circuits and systems in which are generated unwanted harmonics of an input signal. In FIG. 1, signal processor 30 comprises such an harmonically distortive system. Ideally, only frequencies present in the input signal to processor 30 should appear in the output signal thereof. However, as a result, for example, of nonlinearities in processor 30, harmonics having as their respective fundamentals the above-mentioned input signal frequencies, are generated by processor 30 along with the desired (ideal) output signal. In the present invention the harmonic distortion thus generated is significantly reduced by extending input signals to processor 30 through preemphasis network and by thereafter extending the processed signals through de-ernphasis network 50. The input signals to be processed are applied to terminal '11 of pre-emphasis network 10 and the processed output signals appear at output terminal 55 of de -emphasis network 50.

De-emphasis network 50 is characterized by a negative-slope frequency response curve; the attenuation provided thereby is an increasing function of frequency. Thus, the harmonics generated in processor 30 are attenuated relative to their respective fundamentals by de-emphasis network 50. Since those fundamentals collectively comprise the desired processor output signal, de-emphasis network 50 thus reduces the harmonic distortion thereof.

Of course, de-emphasis network 50 also attenuates the various components of the desired output signal of processor 30 relative to each other. The higher the frequency of a given component the. greater its attenuation innetwork 50 relative to the other components of the desired output signal. Accordingly, pr'e-emphasis network 10, having a positive frequency response curve slope of magnitude advantageously equal to that of deemphasis network 50, is provided to anticipate that attenuation. The various frequency components of the input signal at terminal '11 are this increased in amplitude relative to each other in pre-emphasis network 10 in substantially inverse relationship to the relative attenuation thereof in de-emphasis network 50. Consequently, while the unwanted harmonics generated in processor 30 are attenuated in de-emphasis network 50, the frequency characteristic of the input signal at terminal 11 is substantially preserved in the output signal at terminal 55.

FIG. 2 shows an illustrative center clipping arrangement, including center clipper 300, which embodies the principles of the present invention. As can be seen from FIG. 3, which shows the transfer characteristic of center clipper 300, the gain of the-center clipper is substantially zero when the instantaneous magnitude of the input signal thereto lies within a clipping range defined by upper and lowerclipping levels. The center clipper gain outside the clipping range is substantially greater than zero. Thus, such center clippers are advantageously employed, for example, to attenuate crosstalk or other low level noise which might accompany a transmitted signal. The clipping levels are adjusted to correspond to anticipated noise levels so that center clipping a noisy speech signal, for example, substantially removes the noise components therefrom while substantially passing the speech components, the latter having greater amplitudes than the noise components. Of course, the center of the speech signal, that portion lying within the clipping range, is removed along with the noise and this harmonically distorts the speech.

Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, input signals to center clipper 300 in the arrangement of FIG. 2 are first pre-emphasized in pre-emphasis network and the center clipper output signals are then de-emphasized in de-emphasis network 500. The harmonic distortion generated by center clipper 300 is thereby significantly reduced.

Pre-emphasis network 100 illustratively includes operational amplifier 110, feedback resistor 130, and input network 115, the latter comprising resistor and capacitor 125, connected in parallel. De-emphasis network 500 illustratively includes operational amplifidesired center clipper output component is attenuated 6db relative thereto, and each higher-order harmonic is attenuated 6db relative to the next lower-order harmonic. In general, of course, the rate of pre-emphasis and corresponding de-emphasis employed in networks 100 and 500 will depend on the particular application.

Center clipper 300 illustratively includes operational amplifier 332, a first feedback path, comprising resistor 333, and a second feedback path comprising noninverting amplifier 335 and resistor 334, connected in series. In addition, oppositely poled diodes 336 and 337 connect the output terminal of amplifier 335 to positive source 338 and negative source 339, respectively.

The magnitudes of sources 338 and 339 are chosen so that both diodes 336 and 337 are nonconductive when the center clipper input signal is within the clipping range. Thus negative feedback is provided via both of the above-mentioned feedback paths and the gain of center clipper 300 is small (essentially zero). Once the center clipper input signal exceeds the clipping range, however, the output of amplifier 335 is clamped to a constant voltage via one of the two diodes 4 336 and 337, and negative feedback is thereafter pro vided via resistor 333 only. Thus, in accordance with the transfer characteristic of FIG. 3, the gain of center clipper 300 is substantially greater for input signals which exceed the clipping range than for input signals which lie within the clipping range.

It is to be understood that the preceding detailed description and embodiments are merely illustrative of the invention and that modifications obvious to those skilled in the art can be made without departing from the scope of the invention.

I claim:

l. A method of reducing harmonics generated in a center clipper including the steps of, pre-emphasizing the center clipper input signal and de-emphasizing the center clipper output signal.

2. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein the rates of pre-emphasizing and de-emphasizing are substantially equal.

3. A low distortion signal processing arrangement including, a center clipper, means for pre-emphasizing input signals for said center clipper and means for deemphasizing the output signals of said center clipper.

4. An arrangement in accordance with claim 3 wherein said pre-emphasis means and said de-emphasis means have frequency response curve-slopes of substantially equal magnitude.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2956153 *Nov 8, 1957Oct 11, 1960Sylvania Electric ProdElectrical noise reduction techniques
US3014127 *Dec 29, 1958Dec 19, 1961Motorola IncRadio receiver with noise blanking
US3015728 *Oct 22, 1959Jan 2, 1962Hazeltine Research IncNoise suppressor system for a superregenerative receiver
US3059109 *Sep 11, 1959Oct 16, 1962Motorola IncVehicle radio using zener diodes to both regulate and filter the bias voltage supply
US3109991 *Dec 15, 1955Nov 5, 1963Gen ElectricAudio limiter for phase modulation circuits
US3444469 *Apr 13, 1966May 13, 1969Nippon Electric CoVariable-emphasis communications system of the frequency or phasemodulation type
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3906383 *Oct 16, 1973Sep 16, 1975Commissariat Energie AtomiqueMethod and device for automatic correction of harmonic distortion
US3968384 *Oct 21, 1974Jul 6, 1976Gte Automatic Electric Laboratories IncorporatedConstant percentage clipping circuit
US4016497 *May 5, 1976Apr 5, 1977Bell Telephone Laboratories, IncorporatedFeedbackward distortion compensating circuit
US4035734 *Nov 7, 1975Jul 12, 1977Hartman & Braun AktiengesellschaftNoise suppression in measuring signals
US4103243 *Jan 3, 1977Jul 25, 1978Orban Associates, Inc.Method and system for controlling peak signal levels in a bandlimited recording or transmission system employing high-frequency pre-emphasis
US4166924 *Feb 22, 1978Sep 4, 1979Bell Telephone Laboratories, IncorporatedRemoving reverberative echo components in speech signals
US4323797 *May 9, 1980Apr 6, 1982Bell Telephone Laboratories, IncorporatedReciprocal current circuit
US4479250 *Jun 10, 1983Oct 23, 1984Motorola, Inc.Dual audio capture limiter squelch circuit
US7202731Jun 17, 2005Apr 10, 2007Visteon Global Technologies, Inc.Variable distortion limiter using clip detect predictor
US8085943 *Nov 29, 2000Dec 27, 2011Bizjak Karl MNoise extractor system and method
US8249271Jan 23, 2008Aug 21, 2012Karl M. BizjakNoise analysis and extraction systems and methods
US8611548Jul 23, 2012Dec 17, 2013Karl M. BizjakNoise analysis and extraction systems and methods
Classifications
U.S. Classification327/552, 381/94.2, 327/309
International ClassificationH03G7/00, H03G11/00, H03G7/08, H03G11/02
Cooperative ClassificationH03G11/02, H03G7/08
European ClassificationH03G7/08, H03G11/02