Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3710399 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateJan 16, 1973
Filing dateJun 23, 1970
Priority dateJun 23, 1970
Publication numberUS 3710399 A, US 3710399A, US-A-3710399, US3710399 A, US3710399A
InventorsHurst H
Original AssigneeHurst H
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Ossicle replacement prosthesis
US 3710399 A
Abstract
A prosthesis for surgically replacing the three bones of the middle ear when said bones are defective or missing. The prosthesis consists basically of two struts held mechanically and loosely in close proximity and parallel to and partly overlapping each other in such a manner as to allow their combined length to adjust freely to movements of the tympanic membrane without tearing or breaking connections to delicate tissues, while maintaining continuous transmission of sound oscillations from the tympanic membrane to the oval window. The transmission of sound oscillations between the struts is accomplished by a magnetic couple. The proximal strut is attached to the tympanic membrane and the distal strut is attached to the oval window using established surgical procedures. Some such procedures are briefly described elsewhere in this specification.
Images(1)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

United States Patent [191 Hurst 1 Jan. 16,1973

[54] OSSICLE REPLACEMENT PROSTHESIS 221 Filed: June23,l970

2| Appl.No.:57,834

Related US. Application Data [63] Continuation-impart of Ser. No. 756,971, Sept. 3,

I968, abandoned.

[52] US. Cl ..3/l, 128/13 [51] Int. Cl. ..A6ll 1/24 [58] Field of Search ..3/l; 128/13; 24/73 MS, 201 B;

292/2515; 287/DIG. I2

[56] References Clted UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,186,052 6/1965 Bobrow ..24/20l B OTHER PUBLICATIONS "Smyth Clothespin Strut," Richards Manufacturing Co. Catalog, Micro-Surgery Instruments and Implants, 1965, Richards Mfg. Co., Memphis Tenn., page 31.

"Amstrong Modification of Schuknecht Gelfoam-Wire Prosthesis," Richards Manufacturing Co. Catalog, Micro-Surgery Instruments and Implants, I965, Richards Mfg. Co., Memphis, Tenn., page 34.

Primary ExaminerRichard A. Gaudet Assistant Examiner-Ronald L. Frinks [57] ABSTRACT A prosthesis for surgically replacing the three bones of the middle ear when said bones are defective or missing. The prosthesis consists basically of two struts held mechanically and loosely in close proximity and parallel to and partly overlapping each other in such a manner as to allow their combined length to adjust freely to movements of the tympanic membrane without tearing or breaking connections to delicate tissues, while maintaining continuous transmission of sound oscillations from the tympanic membrane to the oval window. The transmission of sound oscillations between the struts is accomplished by a magnetic couple. The proximal strut is attached to the tympanic membrane and the distal strut is attached to the oval window using established surgical procedures. Some such procedures are briefly described elsewhere in this specification.

1 Claim, 4 Drawing Figures OSSICLE REPLACEMENT PROSTHESIS CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 756,97l filed Sept. 3, [968, now abandoned.

BACKGROUND OF THE. INVENTION This invention pertains to surgical replacement of defective or missing bones of the middle ear by implanting a prosthetic device and is indexed by the Patent Office as Class 3-l.

Attention is called to the very high proportion of delayed failures of ossicle replacement implants. Most such failures are caused by the failure of a rigid prosthesis to yield to unidirectional movements of the tympanic membrane. In most cases movements are caused by air pressure changes. Some are caused by swelling of certain tissues, etc.

The tympanic membrane must respond to two unrelated kinds of movements. Its first and objective function is to transform airborne sound waves into corresponding mechanical oscillations which, via the ossicle chain, will move the oval window diaphragm inward and outward to correspond in time and magnitude with the said sound waves. These movements are of very small magnitude, even for loud sounds, and are ofequal magnitude inwardly and outwardly resulting in zero mean movement of the tympanic membrane. These movements rarely, if ever, damage tissues or bones. The second kind of movement to which the tympanic membrane is subjected is usually caused by changes in air pressure which force the membrane unidirectionally inward or outward. The eustachian tube opens, occasionally, and allows air to enter or leave the tympanic cavity and thus equalize the pressure on the membrane, allowing it to return to its normal position, but the eustachian tube is closed most of the time and so does not protect the middle ear parts from injury from such movements. In the normal ear the joint connecting the malleus to the incus provides for such movements without injury to tissues or bones and without interruption of sound transmission.

It is believed that, prior to this invention, there was no device known for prosthetically connecting the cen tral area of the tympanic membrane direct to the oval window which did, or was claimed to, allow the tympanic membrane to move freely inward or outward while continuously transmitting sound oscillations from said membrane to the oval window diaphragm.

DESCRIPTION OF PRIOR ART Heretofore surgeons, when prosthetically replacing auditory ossicles, have connected the tympanic membrane to the oval window with a single strut, of metal, plastic or living bone. Such struts might take the form of wire, rod or tubing and were usually attached near the center of the tympanic membrane so as to obtain maximum sensitivity to sounds striking the membrane. The distal end of the prosthesis was implanted in the oval window diaphragm. This transmitted the sound oscillations to the inner ear. But when, post-surgically, the tympanic membrane was forced inward, the rigid strut pressed in upon the paralymph usually causing vertigo and sometimes rupture of the oval window membrane. This, in turn, caused loss of the fluid and/or cochlear fracture. If the tympanic membrane were forced outward the result was similar, usually requiring further surgery to restore hearing. Often permanent and irreparable damage resulted.

in trying to avoid these strains surgeons tried moving the point of attachment away from the center of the tympanic membrane. When a functional malleus long process was present the surgeon might attach the strut to the neck of the malleus long process. However, as the point of attachment was moved away from the tip of the malleus long process and toward the fulcrum of the malleus-incus complex, the availability of sound energy approached zero. Such attachments were less likely to fracture but were also less likely to restore a satisfactory level of hearing. Some surgeons tried making a firm attachment to the tympanic membrane and depended on contact with the oval window membrane or stapes footplate being sustained by pressure, by using a too long strut. This was found objectionable because:

1. Resulting pressure on the paralymph caused vertigo.

2. The healing process tends to relieve any sustained pressure on body tissues and it usually released the tight contact needed to transmit sound oscillations to the oval window.

3. Pressure tends to dampen oscillations.

4. Distorting the tympanic membrane, by stretching it over the overly long strut, reduced its ability to transform sound waves to mechanical oscillations. If the prosthesis was not attached to the oval window diaphragm but relied on pressure to transmit sound oscillations the results were intermittent and unreliable.

Bearing in mind that sound energy is here transmitted, not as sound waves travelling through the material of which the prosthesis is made, but rather by longitudinal oscillation of the entire prosthesis, it becomes evident that the prosthesis alternately pushes and pulls the oval window diaphragm. It is also clear that a pressure free contact would rattle and/or release the contact, interrupting the hearing.

DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING The accompanying drawings form a part of this specification in which like numerals are employed to designate like parts throughout same.

FIG. 1 Is a view of a section of an ear. The small circle shows the location in the ear of the implanted prosthesis replacing the three missing ossicles.

FIG. 1A Is an enlarged view of the structure enclosed in the small circle appearing in FIG. 1.

FIG. 2 Is a generally longitudinal section of the invention.

Section A-A ls a cross-sectional view of the invention taken at lines designated A-A on FIG. 2.

Numeral designations are explained hereinafter:

l. Strut, herein designated as distal strut, made of magnetic wire having a loop I0 for implanting in the oval window membrane. After removal of the stapes, absorbable gelatine foam is placed in the oval window and the loop 10 is placed in the foam near the center of the annulus. Tissue re-growth will include loop it] in new diaphragm. Some surgeons may prefer to use autogenous vein or fat plugs instead of gelatine foam.

2. Strut, herein designated as proximal strut. It has an arm 9 bent at an angle of about 85 more or less to match the relaxed slant of the tympanic membrane radius where it is to be implanted in the tympanic membrane 13 by grafting a strip of autogenous fibrous tissue 6 over the arm in such a manner as to seal the arm securely to the tympanic membrane. The other end of this strut 2 is embedded securely in the non-magnetic sheath 4.

3. Permanent magnet molded in the non-magnetic sheath.

4. Sheath, made of non-magnetic material, containing the permanent magnet 3, attached to the proximal strut 2 and having a guide hole for the body of the distal strut l.

5. Guide hole in sheath to keep the distal strut 1 parallel with the proximal strut and within the magnetic field of the permanent magnet 3.

6. Tissue graft used to secure arm 9 to the tympanic membrane 7. Oval window membrane, re-grown.

8. Vestibule.

9. Arm of proximal strut, for attaching to tympanic membrane.

l0. Distal strut loop, to be implanted in oval window membrane 7.

ll. Oval window niche.

l2. Annulus ofoval window.

13.Tympanic membrane.

14. External ear canal.

The proximal strut 2, the permanent magnet 3 and sheath 4 of FIG. 2 are herein referred to as the proximal assembly.

FIG. 3 Is a generally longitudinal view of a variation of the invention made entirely of wire, herein designated as variant. The permanent magnet forms part of one strut, the other strut is magnetically attracted to it. Its functions, actions and attachments essentially correspond with basic invention FIG. 2.

l5. Interlocking loops, on variant, to hold the bodies of the struts parallel and in proximity to each other.

16. Distal strut of variant, to attach to oval window membrane.

17. Distal loop of variant, implanted same as loop l0.

l8. Proximal strut of variant.

1). Proximal arm of variant, to be attached to tympanic membrane same as arm 9.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2 of the drawing, the selfadjusting ossicle replacement prosthesis is seen to consist of two struts, herein designated by reference numerals l and 2, and made of biochemically inert wire. The distal strut 1 must be composed of material magnetically responsive to the permanent magnet 3, embedded in the sheath 4. The distal strut has a loop to be implanted in the oval window membrane 7 as shown in FIG. 1. The sheath 4 is composed of non-magnetic material whose purpose is to hold the distal strut l loosely in close proximity to the permanent magnet 3 and parallel to the proximal strut 2. The guide hole 5 in the sheath 4 must be large enough to allow distal strut l to slide FREELY yet small enough to keep said strut generally parallel with proximal strut 2. Proximal strut 2 is securely embedded in sheath 4 and has an arm 9 bent at an angle more or less to generally match the radius of the relaxed tympanic membrane.

When all three ossicles are missing or defective and a functional (original or reconstructed) tympanic membrane is present, the surgeon should measure the distance from the tympanic membrane to the annulus of the oval window and select the correct size prosthesis. Next remove all vestiges of the stapes footplate and place absorbable gelatine foam, (or autogenous fibrous tissue such as vein or fat) in the oval window. The loop 10 of the distal strut 1 is placed in the center of the annulus 12 of the oval window. The proximal strut 2 is securely attached near the center of the tympanic membrane with its arm 9 lying preferrably across the center along a radius extending toward the edge of the membrane, so as to utilize that portion of the tympanic membrane having the greatest sensitivity to sound waves. The arm 9 is secured to the tympanic membrane by placing a small bit of autogenous fibrous tissue over the arm so as to seal the arm to the membrane with minimal stiffening of the tympanic membrane beyond the arm.

When the proximal assembly is set in motion by sound waves striking the tympanic membrane 13 the magnetic lines of force surrounding the permanent magnet are distorted by the magnetic reluctance of the stationary distal strut 1. Resistance to this distortion causes the distal strut to be moved to correspond with the movements of the proximal assembly. The magnetic couple offers no significant resistance to the relatively slow unidirectional movements of the proximal assembly in relation to the distal strut which are caused by unidirectional movements of the tympanic membrane, but it does resist the rapid alternations caused by sound waves striking the tympanic membrane and oscillating the proximal assembly longitudinally. This resistance causes the distal strut 1 to move the oval window diaphragm correspondingly in time and magnitude with the sound waves.

In a telephone receiver the central portion of its diaphragm is set in motion by an alternating magnetic field acting against the resilient suspension of its center. In this invention the magnetic field is set in motion by the sound waves acting upon the tympanic membrane and oscillating the magnet itself.

It should be noted that the magnetic couple in this invention is not for the purpose of holding the struts so tightly together that sound oscillations might be transmitted by frictionally sustained rigidity between the moveable parts of the prosthesis. Such rigidity would not yield to protect delicate tissues. It is demonstrable that sound oscillations will be transmitted across such a magnetic couple as contained in this invention if one strut completely surrounds the body of the other strut, as in a solenoid, with zero friction between the surfaces of the parts. (It appears desirable to have some minimal friction to prevent rattling of the struts striking together.)

By reshaping the arm 9 into a loop it can be connected to an existing and functional malleus, as in the report by J. L. Sheehy in LARYNGOSCOPE(76:1165- 80, July, 1966). A similar shape of loop enables it to be attached to the long process of a functional incus,

replacing only the stapes. It may be thus useful as protecting the implant in the oval window, of an incus replacement, form strain during the healing process, and so reducing the incidence of fistula.

By setting the distal loop on an existing functional stapes footplate and securing an attachment to the footplate by grafting autogenous fibrous tissue over the loop, or some other method of securing a firm attachment, it may be used as a replacement for the incus, with or without using the malleus and without removing the stapes.

The variant (FIG. 3) embodies the permanent magnet as part of one strut. The entire strut may be a permanent magnet. The other strut must be magnetically attractive to it. It is made entirely of wire.

It is to be understood that the forms and materials of this invention, herein shown and described, are to be taken as preferred examples of same, and that various changes may be made in the materials and the size.

shape and arrangements of parts thereof, without departing from the spirit of the invention or the scope of the subjoined claim.

Having described his invention petitioner claims:

1. A Self Adjusting Ossicle Replacement Prosthesis consisting of two struts mechanically and loosely held in proximity and parallel to and partly overlapping each other so that their combined length-may freely adjust to unidirectional longitudinal movements of the one with respect to the other. to be surgically securely attached to the central area of the tympanic membrane by one end of one strut and to the oval window diaphragm by the other end of the other strut and with the struts magnetically coupled together so as to transmit sound oscillations from the tympanic membrane to the oval window without injury or interruption of sound transmission as the tympanic membrane is moved inward or outward by pressure changes, swelling. etc.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3186052 *Feb 1, 1962Jun 1, 1965Cole Nat CorpMagnetic connector
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1 * Amstrong Modification of Schuknecht Gelfoam Wire Prosthesis, Richards Manufacturing Co. Catalog, Micro Surgery Instruments and Implants, 1965, Richards Mfg. Co., Memphis, Tenn., page 34.
2 * Smyth Clothespin Strut, Richards Manufacturing Co. Catalog, Micro Surgery Instruments and Implants, 1965, Richards Mfg. Co., Memphis Tenn., page 31.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4024855 *Nov 18, 1975May 24, 1977Louis BucaloMagnetic filamentary structure and method for using the same
US4161943 *May 10, 1977Jul 24, 1979Paul NogierNeedle implanting apparatus
US4510627 *Oct 25, 1982Apr 16, 1985Treace Medical, Inc.Ossicular prosthesis
US4601723 *Jan 29, 1985Jul 22, 1986Mcgrew Robert NTelescoping self-adjusting ossicular prostheses
US4624672 *Mar 15, 1984Nov 25, 1986Edmundas LenkauskasCoiled wire prosthesis for complete or partial ossicular reconstruction
US4778466 *May 27, 1986Oct 18, 1988Morton BrotmanNasal prosthesis
US4817607 *May 15, 1987Apr 4, 1989Richards Medical CompanyMagnetic ossicular replacement prosthesis
US4840178 *May 15, 1987Jun 20, 1989Richards Metal CompanyMagnet for installation in the middle ear
US4871364 *Apr 18, 1983Oct 3, 1989Richards Medical CompanyMetal core ossicular replacement prosthesis
US4921498 *Aug 21, 1989May 1, 1990Richards Medical CompanyMetal core ossicular replacement prosthesis
US5104401 *Jan 16, 1990Apr 14, 1992Heinz KurzAuditory ossicles prosthesis
US5151105 *Oct 7, 1991Sep 29, 1992Kwan Gett CliffordCollapsible vessel sleeve implant
US5220918 *May 15, 1991Jun 22, 1993Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.Trans-tympanic connector for magnetic induction hearing aid
US5259032 *Nov 12, 1991Nov 2, 1993Resound Corporationcontact transducer assembly for hearing devices
US5370689 *Jul 23, 1992Dec 6, 1994Xomed-Treace, Inc.Method of implanting a middle ear prosthesis
US5425104 *Aug 17, 1994Jun 13, 1995Resound CorporationInconspicuous communication method utilizing remote electromagnetic drive
US5433749 *Mar 8, 1993Jul 18, 1995Clifford; Jerome R.Apparatus for enhancing hearing in an ear
US6432139Jan 29, 1999Aug 13, 2002Spiggle & TheisMiddle ear implant
US7668325May 3, 2005Feb 23, 2010Earlens CorporationHearing system having an open chamber for housing components and reducing the occlusion effect
US7691103Apr 6, 2010Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas SystemDevices for use in transluminal and endoluminal surgery
US7867160Jan 11, 2011Earlens CorporationSystems and methods for photo-mechanical hearing transduction
US7871439 *Jan 20, 2005Jan 18, 2011Heinz Kurz Gmbh MedizintechnikAuditory ossicle prosthesis with tuning option
US8057542Nov 15, 2011EnteroptyxOssicular prosthesis having helical coil
US8142500Apr 8, 2010Mar 27, 2012Heinz Kurz Gmbh MedizintechnikVariable-length ossicular prosthesis
US8262729Jul 2, 2009Sep 11, 2012EnteroptyxDynamic ossicular prosthesis
US8295523Oct 2, 2008Oct 23, 2012SoundBeam LLCEnergy delivery and microphone placement methods for improved comfort in an open canal hearing aid
US8396239Mar 12, 2013Earlens CorporationOptical electro-mechanical hearing devices with combined power and signal architectures
US8401212Oct 14, 2008Mar 19, 2013Earlens CorporationMultifunction system and method for integrated hearing and communication with noise cancellation and feedback management
US8401214Mar 19, 2013Earlens CorporationEardrum implantable devices for hearing systems and methods
US8480668Apr 6, 2010Jul 9, 2013Board Of Regents Of The University Of Texas SystemDevices for use in transluminal and endoluminal surgery
US8506628Nov 14, 2011Aug 13, 2013EnteroptyxOssicular prosthesis having helical coil
US8623011Oct 9, 2009Jan 7, 2014Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.Magnetic surgical sled with locking arm
US8696541Dec 3, 2010Apr 15, 2014Earlens CorporationSystems and methods for photo-mechanical hearing transduction
US8715152Jun 17, 2009May 6, 2014Earlens CorporationOptical electro-mechanical hearing devices with separate power and signal components
US8715153Jun 22, 2010May 6, 2014Earlens CorporationOptically coupled bone conduction systems and methods
US8715154Jun 24, 2010May 6, 2014Earlens CorporationOptically coupled cochlear actuator systems and methods
US8787609Feb 19, 2013Jul 22, 2014Earlens CorporationEardrum implantable devices for hearing systems and methods
US8824715Nov 16, 2012Sep 2, 2014Earlens CorporationOptical electro-mechanical hearing devices with combined power and signal architectures
US8845705Jun 24, 2010Sep 30, 2014Earlens CorporationOptical cochlear stimulation devices and methods
US8920496Mar 3, 2008Dec 30, 2014Sentient Medical LimitedOssicular replacement prosthesis
US8936637Oct 3, 2012Jan 20, 2015Heinz Kurz Gmbh MedizintechnikVariable-length passive ossicular prosthesis
US8986187Mar 18, 2014Mar 24, 2015Earlens CorporationOptically coupled cochlear actuator systems and methods
US9033957Jun 26, 2008May 19, 2015Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas SystemSurgical anchor and system
US9049528Jul 24, 2014Jun 2, 2015Earlens CorporationOptical electro-mechanical hearing devices with combined power and signal architectures
US9055379Jun 7, 2010Jun 9, 2015Earlens CorporationOptically coupled acoustic middle ear implant systems and methods
US9125681Sep 26, 2012Sep 8, 2015Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.Detachable end effector and loader
US9154891Jan 7, 2010Oct 6, 2015Earlens CorporationHearing system having improved high frequency response
US9186203Oct 9, 2009Nov 17, 2015Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.Method for exchanging end effectors In Vivo
US9226083Feb 15, 2013Dec 29, 2015Earlens CorporationMultifunction system and method for integrated hearing and communication with noise cancellation and feedback management
US9277335Jun 10, 2014Mar 1, 2016Earlens CorporationEardrum implantable devices for hearing systems and methods
US9295485Oct 9, 2009Mar 29, 2016Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.Loader for exchanging end effectors in vivo
US9326943Jun 22, 2010May 3, 2016Sandra M. SkovlundBiodegradable prosthesis
US20030097178 *Oct 2, 2002May 22, 2003Joseph RobersonLength-adjustable ossicular prosthesis
US20060189841 *Oct 11, 2005Aug 24, 2006Vincent PluvinageSystems and methods for photo-mechanical hearing transduction
US20060251278 *May 3, 2005Nov 9, 2006Rodney Perkins And AssociatesHearing system having improved high frequency response
US20070083263 *Oct 6, 2006Apr 12, 2007Uwe SteinhardtOssiclse prosthesis with elastic rotary joint
US20070255273 *Apr 28, 2007Nov 1, 2007Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas SystemDevices for use in Transluminal and Endoluminal Surgery
US20080208337 *Jan 20, 2005Aug 28, 2008Heinz Kurz Gmbh MedizintechnikAuditory Ossicle Prosthesis with Tuning Option
US20080269779 *Jun 26, 2008Oct 30, 2008Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas SystemSurgical anchor and system
US20090092271 *Oct 2, 2008Apr 9, 2009Earlens CorporationEnergy Delivery and Microphone Placement Methods for Improved Comfort in an Open Canal Hearing Aid
US20090097681 *Oct 14, 2008Apr 16, 2009Earlens CorporationMultifunction System and Method for Integrated Hearing and Communication with Noise Cancellation and Feedback Management
US20090149697 *Aug 29, 2008Jun 11, 2009Uwe SteinhardtLength-variable auditory ossicle prosthesis
US20090198334 *Feb 6, 2008Aug 6, 2009Kraus Eric MOssicular Prosthesis Having Helical Coil
US20100010629 *Jul 2, 2009Jan 14, 2010Bhansali Sanjay ADynamic Ossicular Prosthesis
US20100048982 *Feb 25, 2010Earlens CorporationOptical Electro-Mechanical Hearing Devices With Separate Power and Signal Components
US20100202645 *Aug 12, 2010Earlens CorporationHearing system having improved high frequency response
US20100256636 *Apr 6, 2010Oct 7, 2010Raul FernandezDevices for Use in Transluminal and Endoluminal Surgery
US20100262236 *Oct 14, 2010Uwe SteinhardtVariable-length ossicular prosthesis
US20100312040 *Dec 9, 2010SoundBeam LLCOptically Coupled Acoustic Middle Ear Implant Systems and Methods
US20100317914 *Dec 16, 2010SoundBeam LLCOptically Coupled Active Ossicular Replacement Prosthesis
US20110077453 *Mar 31, 2011Earlens CorporationSystems and Methods For Photo-Mechanical Hearing Transduction
US20110087223 *Oct 9, 2009Apr 14, 2011Spivey James TMagnetic surgical sled with locking arm
US20110087224 *Apr 14, 2011Cadeddu Jeffrey AMagnetic surgical sled with variable arm
US20110087266 *Apr 14, 2011Conlon Sean PLoader for exchanging end effectors in vivo
US20110106254 *Mar 3, 2008May 5, 2011Sentient Medical LimitedOssicular replacement prosthesis
US20110142274 *Jun 18, 2010Jun 16, 2011SoundBeam LLCEardrum Implantable Devices For Hearing Systems and Methods
US20110144719 *Jun 18, 2010Jun 16, 2011SoundBeam LLCOptically Coupled Cochlear Implant Systems and Methods
DE10331644B3 *Jul 8, 2003Jan 20, 2005Technische Universität DresdenGehörknöchelchenprothese
DE29722084U1 *Dec 13, 1997Feb 12, 1998Heinz Kurz Gmbh MedizintechnikGehörknöchelprothese
DE102007041539A1Aug 31, 2007Mar 5, 2009Heinz Kurz Gmbh MedizintechnikLängenvariable Gehörknöchelchenprothese
DE102007041539B4 *Aug 31, 2007Jul 30, 2009Heinz Kurz Gmbh MedizintechnikLängenvariable Gehörknöchelchenprothese
DE102009016468B3 *Apr 10, 2009Dec 24, 2009Heinz Kurz Gmbh MedizintechnikOssicular prosthesis for replacing or bridging element of human ossicular chain, has partial branches deformable permanently and plastically, and folded into multiple straps transverse to longitudinal axis, before deformation of branches
DE202009004715U1Apr 10, 2009Jun 10, 2009Heinz Kurz Gmbh MedizintechnikLängenvariable Gehörknöchelchenprothese
DE202011052221U1Dec 7, 2011Jan 16, 2012Heinz Kurz Gmbh MedizintechnikLängenvariable passive Gehörknöchelchenprothese
EP2030595A2Aug 20, 2008Mar 4, 2009Heinz Kurz GmbH MedizintechnikOssicular prosthetics with variable length
EP2238946A1Mar 27, 2010Oct 13, 2010Heinz Kurz GmbH MedizintechnikOssicular prosthetics with variable length
EP2601909A1Jul 10, 2012Jun 12, 2013Heinz Kurz GmbH MedizintechnikPassive ossicular prosthetics with variable length
WO1999042060A1 *Jan 29, 1999Aug 26, 1999Spiggle & TheisMiddle ear implant
Classifications
U.S. Classification623/10, 600/12
International ClassificationA61F2/18
Cooperative ClassificationA61F2/18, A61F2002/183
European ClassificationA61F2/18