Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3717879 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateFeb 20, 1973
Filing dateDec 3, 1968
Priority dateDec 3, 1968
Publication numberUS 3717879 A, US 3717879A, US-A-3717879, US3717879 A, US3717879A
InventorsGanssle E
Original AssigneeNeotec Corp
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Collapsible reflector
US 3717879 A
Abstract
This disclosure is directed to a collapsible reflector including a number of substantially rigid foldable panels covered with a reflecting surface spaced around a central hub and flexible reflecting material located between adjacent panels; the substantially rigid panels being folded adjacent the hub in a small volume for stowing and upon deployment providing the required stiffness and contour control for the reflector.
Images(4)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

United States Patent Ganssle 1 Feb. 20, 1973 [54] COLLAPSIBLE REFLECTOR [72] Inventor: Eugene R. Ganssle, Silver- Spring,

[73] Assignee: Neotec Corporation, Rockville, Md.

[22] Filed: Dec. 3, 1968 211 App]. No.: 780,771

52 u.s.c| ..343/915,350/292 51 Int.Cl. ..H0lq 15 20 58 FieldofSearch ..343/915;350/292,302

[5 6] References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS Balton ..343/915 Holland et a1. ..343/9l5 Mason et al. ..343/9l5 Carman et al. ..343/915 Primary Examiner-Herman Karl Saalbach Assistant Examiner-Saxfleld Chatmon, Jr. Attorney-Leonard S. Selman [57] ABSTRACT This disclosure is directed to a collapsible reflector including a number of substantially rigid foldable panels covered with a reflecting surface spaced around a central hub and flexible reflecting material located between adjacent panels; the substantially rigid panels being folded adjacent the hub in a small volume for stowing and upon deployment providing the required stiffness and contour control for the reflector.

10 Claims, 6 Drawing Figures Pmmwr 3717. s19

sum 2 or 4 INVENTOR. EUGENE R GANSSLE AT TORNE Y PATENTED FEBZU i975 SHEEI 3 0F 4 INVENTCR. E UGENE R. GANSS LE W dam ATTORNEY PATEnmFtseoma v 7 ,879

I snmuora Fls. 6

f /1NVENTOR EUGENE R. GANSSLE ATTORNEY COLLAPSIBLE REFLECTOR The reflector of the present invention is intended for use as a means for reflecting radiant energy. The radiant energy may be either in the visible light spectrum or it may be microwave energy in which case the reflector may be used as an antenna assuming the shape of a paraboloid of revolution, for example. Since, for normal operating frequencies, the size of the reflector must be quite large, certain problems with respect to handling arise. For use in space, for example, it is desirable that such an antenna be foldable for storage in a launch vehicle and easily and automatically erectable when it reaches its destination.

The present invention not only overcomes the disadvantages of those antennas which are not suited for space application due to their construction using sliding parts and auxiliary means for erecting and locking the reflector in its erected configuration, but it also is superior to other known space antennas in that it is constructed to provide the necessary rigidity and contour control which is lacking in devices suggested heretofore.

The reflector of this invention takes the form of an automatically erecting surface of revolution which consists of a plurality of substantially rigid panels spaced around a central hub member and connected thereto by hinge means so that they may be folded adjacent the hub member for storage. The reflecting surface of the panels can be solid skin, a supported flexible reflecting material or any combination thereof. The panels are each articulated at approximately the center thereof and hinge means are provided so that the outer portion thereof may be folded adjacent the inner portion of the panel hinged to the hub member. Flexible reflecting material is located between the adjacent sets of panels. Contoured radial formers may be spaced across this area sufficiently often to provide an additional degree of contour control for the flexible reflecting material. The formers are each split and the parts hinged together to allow them to be folded adjacent the hub in a manner similar to that of the panels.

Deployment energy can be provided by springs, electric motors, hydraulic, pneumatic or pyrotechnic pressure, or other equivalent means. Restraining means are usually provided which are released at the moment it is most advantageous for the reflector to deploy itself in its operational configuration.

Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to provide a reflector which is collapsible into a minimum space, but which when erected has the required rigidity of structure to provide the optimum contour of the reflector when in operation.

Another object of this invention is to provide a reflector which is automatically erectable when it reaches a predetermined destination.

Other objects of the invention will in part be obvious and will in part appear hereinafter.

The invention accordingly comprises the apparatus possessing the construction, combination of elements and arrangement of parts which are exemplified in the following detailed disclosure, and the scope of. the application of which will be indicated in the claims.

2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the reflector of this invention shown in its erected configuration;

FIG. 2 is a front view of the reflector partially broken away to show the internal structure;

FIG. 3 is a side view of the reflector shown in its collapsed condition and in dotted lines in its open position;

FIG. 4 is a back view of the reflector shown in its collapsed condition;

FIG. 5 is a segmented view of the outside support ring; and

FIG. 6 are schematic representations of some of the other possible configurations the reflector may have in its collapsed condition.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT Referring to the drawings, there is shown in FIG. 1 a reflector 10 erected in operational configuration for use as a reflector of microwave energy. The reflector comprises a plurality of panels 12 spaced around a central hub 14. The panels 12 consist of a substantially rigid frame composed of struts 16., as shown exposed in FIG. 2, and each panel is covered with a reflecting material 18. The reflecting material 18 may be a relatively stiff copper or aluminum mesh, for example, or even a solid sheet of metal stretched across the frame. Between each alternating pair of substantially rigid panels 12 is a sheet of flexible reflecting material 20 which may be composed, for example, of a flexible mesh of expanded aluminum fixed to a sheet of Mylar. Contoured radial formers 22, as shown in FIG. 2, are spaced sufficiently often to provide the desired degree of contour control for the flexible reflecting material 20.

The broken away portion of FIG. 2 shows the internal structure of the antenna in detail. The hub structure is substantially circular in shape and is composed of supports 24 covered by a solid skin 26 which is a reflecting material. In the preferred embodiment of the invention the hub has a diameter no larger than the diameter of the antenna in its collapsed condition. The panel struts 16 are hinged at joints 28 to the hub 14 and each panel 18 is articulated at approximately its midpoint and is hinged to itself at joints 30. The articulation joints 30 as well as joints 28 comprise spring biased hinge means 31, shown schematically in FIG. 3, which supply energy for erecting the antenna. The formers 22 are also articulated at approximately their midpoint and the two portions of each former may similarly be joined by spring biased hinge means 31. The formers are also hinged to the panels 12 and/or to the hub 14 where they intersect these structures.

Restraining means 32, as shown in FIG. 2, may comprise a simple link cable which with connecting cables 33 attach to a number of latches 34 which engage holding means 36 on the outer portions of panels 12, more clearly shown in FIG. 3. The cables may be released by detonating upon signal an exploding link 39 which will release latches 34 and allow the antenna to deploy itself to its operational configuration. Alternate means of restraining the panels include individual solenoid released latches, individual pyrotechnical releases, or pushrod actuated latches, or the like. To control the rate of deployment, a hydraulic damper 35 or equivalent structure is provided on hub 14 as shown in FIG. 2. Other means of rate control include pneumatic dampers, escapement mechanisms or a centrifugal brake. Most reliable deployment will occur if all the panels 12 are synchronized to deploy at the same rate. This can be accomplished by a cable system which is constrained to deploy simultaneously by attachment to a common rotating fitting 37, as shown in FIG. 2, or other means such as synchronized motors, push rods,

torque rods, or the like. The cable system consists of two cables attached to the panels 12. Cable 47, as shown in FIG. 3, extends from the common rotating fitting 37, through the hubQaround pulley 35 and attaches to the inboard section 43 of the panels 12 thus constraining all inboard sections to the motion of the rotating fitting 37. Cable 49 is attached at one end to the hub structure, passes around pulleys 48 and 50 and is attached at its other end to outboard section 45 of the panels 12, thus constraining the motion of the outboard sections to that of the inboard sections. Deployment energy can be provided by springs such as the spring biased hinge means mentioned and additionally by electric motors or hydraulic, pneumatic, or pyrotechnic pressure or other means which will be apparent to those familiar with such deployment systems.

FIG. 4 of the drawing shows the collapsed reflector from the rear with all the panels 12 folded substantially flat upon themselves and against the hub as shown in solid lines in FIG. 3. Between the panels 12 the flexible material 20 is shown forming radial pleats 40 and also folded upon itself. The formers 22 supporting the flexible material are also folded at joints 38 substantially flat against themselves and against hub 14.

For optimum stiffness and contour control, the outboard tips of the formers 22 should be structurally interconnected by a peripheral set of links as shown in the enlarged fragmentary view of FIG. 5. Each link 41 and 42 is pivotally connected to the formers 22 and to each other to allow the formers to come together when the reflector is collapsed with the flexible material 20 radially pleated between the pair of formers. To provide a positive restraint for the formers upon deployment of the reflector, a pair of stop members 44 and 46 are provided on links 41 and 42, respectively. The two stop members will come into abutment with each other, as shown in FIG. 5, as the formers spread apart to their proper deployed positions. It should be understood that other means such as support wires or expandable metal members might also be used interconnecting the former tips.

FIG. 6 is a series of schematic representations of some of the other possible configurations the reflector may have in its collapsed condition. These are only some of the variations of the invention which may become apparent from this disclosure. One other extremely important variation of the invention is the aspect that within a given allowable stowed diameter in a space vehicle, for example, further growth in reflector size is achievable by adding outboard sections to a panel such as panel 12 in a radial direction, i.e., going from a two section panel to a panel having three, four or more sections as shown in FIG. 6.

Since certain changes may be made in the above apparatus without departing from the scope of the invention herein involved, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.

I claim:

1. A collapsible reflector adapted to automatically erect to the operational configuration of a surface of revolution, comprising:

a substantially circular hub member, said hub member having a diameter no larger than said reflector in its collapsed condition;

a plurality of substantially rigid folding panels spaced around said hub member and connected thereto by hinge means so that they may fold substantially flat against said hub member when said reflector is collapsed, each of said panels being articulated so that the outer portion thereof may also be folded substantially flat against the inner portion of said panels hinged to said hub member;

flexible reflecting material spaced between said panels; and

relatively stiffer reflecting material than said flexible reflecting material covering said folding panels, said flexible reflecting material being pleated when said reflector is in its collapsed condition in contrast to said relatively stiffer reflecting material on said panels which remains stretched sheet-like across said folding panels when said reflector is either collapsed or in its operational configuration, the rigidity of said folding panels providing the required stiffness and contour control for the reflector.

2. A collapsible reflector as described in claim 1 including a plurality of formers supporting said flexible reflecting material when said reflector is in its erected configuration, an inner portion of said formers being hinged to said hub member and folded substantially flat against said hub member when said reflector is collapsed and said formers being articulated so that an outer portion thereof may be folded substantially flat against the inner portion when said reflector is in its collapsed condition.

3. A collapsible reflector as described in claim 2 including linking members connecting the outer tips of said formers with one another to enhance the rigidity of said reflector, said linking members being foldable when said reflector is collapsed and having stop members thereon to aid them in unfolding to their proper connecting position as said reflector unfolds from its collapsed condition to its operational configuration.

4. A collapsible reflector as described in claim 1 including at least one other set of substantially rigid folding panels connected to the outer portion of said folding panels connected to said hub member.

5. A collapsible reflector as described in claim 1 wherein its operational configuration assumes the shape of a paraboloid of revolution.

6. A collapsible reflector as described in claim 1 wherein said hub member is covered with reflecting material.

7. A collapsible reflector as described in claim 2 including means for providing the force required to cause said reflector to automatically erect to its operational configuration from its collapsed condition.

said panels to the inner portion thereof to provide the force required to cause said reflector to automatically erect to its operational configuration.

10. A collapsible reflector as described in claim 9 including link cable means to releasably restrain said reflector in its collapsed condition and exploding link means which are exploded to release said restraining means to allow said reflector to erect to its operational configuration.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2572430 *May 17, 1946Oct 23, 1951Breeze CorpAntenna structure
US2985881 *Dec 5, 1958May 23, 1961Herman HollandA reflector utilizing pre-stressed elements
US3360798 *Jan 13, 1965Dec 26, 1967Webb James ECollapsible reflector
US3397399 *Feb 7, 1966Aug 13, 1968Goodyear Aerospace CorpCollapsible dish reflector
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4291677 *Sep 22, 1978Sep 29, 1981Monk Robert JSolar energy collector
US4315265 *Jun 11, 1980Feb 9, 1982Trw Inc.Rigid collapsible dish structure
US4352113 *Jun 26, 1981Sep 28, 1982Societe Nationale Industrielle AerospatialeFoldable antenna reflector
US4612550 *Mar 31, 1983Sep 16, 1986Thomson CsfInverted Cassegrain antenna for multiple function radars
US4646102 *Sep 27, 1985Feb 24, 1987Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaDeployable antenna reflector apparatus
US4658265 *May 31, 1985Apr 14, 1987Messerschmitt-Boelkow-Blohm Gesellschaft Mit Beschraenkter HaftungFoldable and unfoldable antenna reflector
US4761655 *Nov 29, 1985Aug 2, 1988British Telecommunications PlcTransportable antenna for an earth station
US4780726 *Dec 3, 1984Oct 25, 1988Trw Inc.Depolyable reflector
US4845511 *Jan 27, 1987Jul 4, 1989Harris Corp.Space deployable domed solar concentrator with foldable panels and hinge therefor
US4862190 *May 15, 1987Aug 29, 1989Trw Inc.Deployable offset dish structure
US4989015 *Oct 26, 1987Jan 29, 1991Hughes Aircraft CompanyUnfurlable mesh reflector
US5642122 *May 11, 1994Jun 24, 1997Teledesic CorporationSpacecraft antennas and beam steering methods for satellite communciation system
US5864324 *May 15, 1996Jan 26, 1999Trw Inc.Telescoping deployable antenna reflector and method of deployment
US5898529 *Jun 20, 1997Apr 27, 1999Ball Aerospace & Technologies, Inc.Deployable space-based telescope
US6191757 *Apr 8, 1999Feb 20, 2001Hughes Electronics CorporationSystem for compact stowage of segmented dish reflectors
US6373449Sep 20, 2000Apr 16, 2002The Johns Hopkins UniversityHybrid inflatable antenna
US6624796 *Mar 15, 2001Sep 23, 2003Lockheed Martin CorporationSemi-rigid bendable reflecting structure
US7839567 *Sep 5, 2006Nov 23, 2010ThalesDeployable reflector in the form of a reuleaux triangle for a space observation instrument
DE3315111A1 *Apr 27, 1983Nov 3, 1983British AerospaceFaltbarer reflektor, insbesondere fuer raumfahrzeuge
DE3333013A1 *Sep 13, 1983Mar 21, 1985Autoflug GmbhRadar reflector of flat shape
EP1168498A2 *May 30, 2001Jan 2, 2002Lockheed Martin CorporationSemi-rigid bendable reflecting structure
WO2001022530A1 *Sep 20, 2000Mar 29, 2001Johns Hokpins UniversityHybrid inflatable antenna
Classifications
U.S. Classification343/915, 359/851
International ClassificationH01Q15/16, H01Q15/14
Cooperative ClassificationH01Q15/162
European ClassificationH01Q15/16B1
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Jan 24, 1985ASAssignment
Owner name: PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC COMPANY
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:004376/0149
Effective date: 19850521
Sep 3, 1981ASAssignment
Owner name: NEOTEC CORPORATION, 2431 LINDEN LANE, SILVER SPRIN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENT COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:003911/0936
Effective date: 19810903
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENT COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:003911/0936
Owner name: NEOTEC CORPORATION, A CORP. OF DE., MARYLAND