Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3722677 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateMar 27, 1973
Filing dateJun 3, 1971
Priority dateJun 4, 1970
Also published asCA936975A1, DE2127413A1
Publication numberUS 3722677 A, US 3722677A, US-A-3722677, US3722677 A, US3722677A
InventorsLehnert B
Original AssigneeLehnert B
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Device for causing particles to move along curved paths
US 3722677 A
Abstract  available in
Images(1)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

United States Patent 1 Lehnert [54] DEVICE FOR CAUSING PARTICLES TO MOVE ALONG CURVED PATHS [76] Inventor: Bo Peter Lehnert, Sommarvagen 1,

8-182 74 Stocksund, Sweden [22] Filed: June 3, 1971 [21] Appl. No.: 149,732

[30] Foreign Application Priority Data June 4, 1970 Sweden ..7788/70 [52] U.S. Cl. .209/144, 55/3, 55/100,

209/211, 209/227 [51] Int. Cl ..B04c 3/06 [58] Field of Search ..209/21 1 215, 227,144; 210/222, 223; 55/100, 3

[5 6] References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,417,189 5/1922 McCarthy ..209/2l5 X I451 Mar. 27, 1973 3,277,631 10/1966 Sunnen ..55/l00 X Primary ExaminerTim R. Miles Assistant ExaminerWilliam Cuchlinski, Jr.

Att0rneyFlynn & Frishauf [57] ABSTRACT A cylindrical vessel confines a volume therein, the cylindrical vessel being subjected to an axial magnetic field, and a radial electrical field. In order to provide for laminar flow of particles introduced into the vessel and removed therefrom, electrodes establishing the electrical field are formed as rings located at the end surfaces of the cylindrical vessel, and connected to tap points on a voltage divider, to establish an electrical gradient which is substantially parallel to planes passing through the curved paths of movement of the particles.

6 Claims, 1 Drawing Figure DEVICE FOR CAUSING PARTICLES TO MOVE ALONG CURVED PATHS The present invention relates to a device adapted within a confined volume to establish and control movement along curved paths of particles, by example for the purpose of separating those particles from other particles, use being made of a magnetic field and an electric field, the major component of each of said fields being at least substantially perpendicular to each other.

Particles which are present within a confined volume and subjected to the influence of two fields oriented as above will, under that influence, be imparted a movement which is perpendicular to the main direction of the electrical as well as of the magnetic field. By the use of conveniently shaped electrodes defining between themselves the electric field, for example by use of an outer circular electrode which conveniently may also form the outer wall of the confined volume, and an inner centrally located electrode, it is possible to control the movement of the particles in such a way that the corresponding paths will be circumferentially closed and generally circular. Such a device can be looked upon as a centrifuge the radial velocity gradient of the particles being however different from that of the conventional mechanical centrifuge. In a mechanical centrifuging apparatus, the angular velocity of particles at different radial distances is the same. Thus the circumferential velocity increases when the radial distance increases. In contrast thereto, in a device forming the subject of the present invention where the movement of the particles is generated by the influence of electric and magnetic fields the circumferential velocity will remain constant and independent of the radial distance. Stated in other words, this means that those particles which are nearest the center of the device exhibit a very high angular velocity.

In centrifuges it is normal practice continuously to supply particles to be centrifuged and, likewise, continuously to extract separated particles. The corresponding internal particle transport through the centrifuge in combination with the high particle rotation velocities results in soon exceeding the value of Reynolds number, where the laminar flow ceases and is replaced by a turbulent flow pattern. The generation of such a turbulence seriously disturbs the desired radial differences of the locations of the particles as determined by the different mass of the particles. Such disturbances detrimentally affect the overall operation ofthe device.

The object of the invention is to provide a device of such a design that disturbances of the types above referred to are either prevented from arising or so minimized that their negative effect is significantly reduced.

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE INVENTION Electrodes are provided, so located and energized that the gradient of the dominating component of the electrical field is controlled, which component is substantially parallel to curved planes passing through the curved paths of movement of the particles.

In accordance with a concept of the invention the control of the electrical field intensity gradient uses electrodes acting between the common center of rotation of the particles and the outer wall of the confined volume. One feature of the invention which is of special value from structural and operational points of view is that those electrodes may be disposed at the one or both end surfaces of the confined volumes meaning that they do not have to pass axially through the volume.

One embodiment of the invention will now be described in greater detail, reference being made to the accompanying drawing which is an exploded perspective view diagrammatically illustrating the main components of a device adapted to operate as a particle separator.

A cylindrical container confines the volume within which the particle separation is to take place. Container 10 has a lower circular bottom 11 and a top end wall 12. The orifice 13 of a conduit 14 through which the particles to be separated are introduced into the container opens in the center of bottom 11. The separation proper will be described below. At the upper end of the container there are two conduits. The first one is constituted by a pipe 15 connected to the central axis of the container and serving as an outlet for separated light particles whereas the other one, formed by a pipe 16, is connected at the circumference and forms an outlet for heavier particles.

Coils 19, 20 surround a lower and an upper pole face 17, 18 respectively. Direct current is supplied to the coils from external current sources S An axially oriented magnetic field B is generated between pole plates 17 and 18. A plurality of electrodes 21 are concentrically disposed, in relation to the longitudinal central axis of the container, at the bottom 11 of the container. Electrodes 21 are preferably closed in the circumferential direction and each connected to a wire 22 having a slide contact engaging a tap on a voltage divider 23 fed with direct voltage from a source S As is realized, an arrangement as now described will make it possible to let the different annular electrodes 21 assume mutually different electrical potentials.

Operation: Conduit 14 is presumed, via some feeding device such as a pump or the like, to be connected to a vessel containing particles to be separated. The majority of the particles supplied may be electrically neutral but that the total amount of particles must always comprise a certain number of charged particles. The charged particles can be formed by electrical discharge taking place between electrodes 21 inside the container 10. As will appear below, the relative number of charged particles can be low which-is a significant advantage of the invention. Moreover, the total amount of particles may comprise particles of different masses or, stated in other words, the charged particles as well as the neutral ones may comprise relatively light and relatively heavy individual particles.

A positively charged particle inside the container will be subjected to the influence of an electrical field E and a magnetic field B. As is understood, electrical fields will be set up between the annular electrodes and the field intensity lines will pass between those electrodes. This means that in the layer next above bottom 11 those electrical fields will exhibit dominating components which are horizontal and radial. Provided that the potential distribution is generally as has been illustrated on the drawing, i.e. any given electrode has a higher potential than the next adjacent one closer to the central axis of the container, that particle will, under the influence of the just-mentioned electrical field vector, be subjected to a force acting radially inwards. As soon as the particle has started its corresponding inward movement and, in the course thereof, passes across the magnetic field B it will in a manner known per se under the common influence of those two fields assume a resulting average velocity represented by vector V. Due to the circular shape of the electrodes the particle will thus describe a circular path having superimposed on it small radial lateral deflections caused by heat energy movements. Collisions between charged and not charged particles will convey that circular movement to the uncharged particles (the neutral gas) meaning that the crossing magnetic and electric fields and currents will bring all of the gas to rotate around the central longitudinal axis of container 10. As is understood, charged as well as neutral particles of mutually different masses will in response to the corresponding differences in the centrifugal forces acting upon them eventually assume balanced positions at different radial distances from the axis of rotation in the layer close to bottom 11.

The above described rotation of the charged and neutral particles in the bottom layer is propagated upwards throughout all of the confined volume. The physical explanation of that phenomenon is as follows. The particlemixture constitutes an electrically conductive gas which, in the presence of a magnetic filed, has very pronounced direction-dependent properties. In the direction along the magnetic field intensity lines the gas behaves as an electrical conductor of very high specific conductivity. In any direction perpendicular to those field lines the conductivity is likewise great, but only as long as the gas is at rest. As soon as a radial electrical current passes across the magnetic field a rotational movement will be imparted to the gas. This gives rise to a counter-electromotive force, in exactly the same manner as in an ordinary electric motor. As a result thereof the magnetic field intensity lines in the gas may be considered vertical extensions of the electrode rings 21 all the way from the bottom 11 of the container to its top end wall 12. The electrical current density along the field lines will be so high that the rotational movement initiated at the bottom is propagated upwards throughout the entire confined volume until its angular velocity has assumed a substantially constant value along any individual field intensity line. As has been pointed out above, it is a special advantage of the invention that the separation achieved covers neutral particles as well and this so also when the percentage of uncharged particles is low. The reason for this is that rotation of uncharged particles is obtained through collisions between them and the charged ones. Accordingly, the net result will be that charged as well as neutral particles will, along the entire axial extent of the container, be caused to rotate under the influence of forces which, in an initial phase, solely affect charged particles close to the bottom of the container. The neutral particles will naturally during their rotation be affected neither by the magnetic nor by the electrical field. On the other hand, they will be subjected to the centrifugal force C. That force is balanced by a radially inwards acting force, a pressure gradientVP,

the generation of which is due to the fact that the mass density increases with increasing radial distance from the central axis. The higher mass density has two aspects. Firstly, due to the influence of the centrifugal force, the absolute particle concentration will generally tend to be greater in the circumferential regions than at the center. Secondly, the centrifugal force is directly proportional to the particle mass for which reason there will also arise a relative dissimilarity, i.e., the concentration of heavier particles will be greater at greater radial distances.

It should be observed that the effects so far discussed, the separation and the axial propagation of the rotational movement, do not per se call for presence of a plurality of annular electrodes 21. In principle, those effects are attainable by means of a single central electrode and a single outer electrode both disposed at the bottom 11 of the container. In accordance with the invention, presence of the additional electrodes does, however, yield a substantial technical advantage. Potentiometer 22, 23 makes it possible, in response to the actual operational conditions, to adjust and control the potentials of the individual electrodes in such a way that there is created a certain desired radial potential distribution permitting control of the rotational velocities of the particles in different radial layers. As was earlier mentioned one of the major disadvantages of prior art centrifuges of the general type discussed is that, at certain velocity distributions, there will occur turbulence which disturbs all of the flow pattern. In accordance with the present invention the potentiometer and the annular electrodes, permit, in each individual instance to select a velocity distribution which either completely eliminates or strongly reduces such turbulence so that a generally laminar flow pattern can be preserved.

It should be emphasized again that the drawing is diagrammatic and only intended to illustrate the general layout of one practical application of the invention, in a particle separator. The invention may, however, be applied in many other connections, the sole essential condition being that special electrodes are relied upon for control ofthe dominating component of the electrical field thus allowing the control of the velocity distribution above explained. Also as far as the detailed design is concerned many deviations and modifications are possible. By way of example, there is no need for the electrodes to be circular or completely closed in their circumferential direction but, on the other hand, it is obvious that for optimal ease and economy of manufacture, such a configuration is usually used. The electrodes may also be located differently from what has here been shown. Referring directly to the illustrated embodiment it can be said that a second set of annular electrodes may be mounted at the top end wall 12 of the container. In such a case it is possible electrically to connect the electrodes of the lower and upper sets which pairwise correspond to each other, in parallel. The negative terminal of voltage divider 23 is connected to the center of the cylindrical vessel, adjacent orifice 13.

What I claim is:

1. A device to impart movement along curved paths to particles located in a confined volume comprising:

a closed vessel (10, ll, 12) defining therein said confined volume and means providing access to and egress from the confined volumn;

means (17, 19; 18, 20) generating a magnetic field within the vessel;

means (S 21) generating an electrical field within the vessel;

said magnetic field generating means and electrical field generating means being located with respect to each other such that the major components of the magnetic and electrical fields are substantially perpendicular to each other;

wherein the electrical field generating means includes:

a source providing a plurality of tap points (22) to provide electrical potential over an electric gradient;

and a plurality of electrodes (21) located within the vessel and connected to respective tap points and establishing a gradient of the major component of the electrical field in planes substantially parallel to the planes of the paths of the movement of the particles to provide essentially laminar flow during such movement of the particle.

2. A device according to claim 1 wherein the closed vessel (10, 11, 12) is essentially cylindrical;

and said access and egress means comprise means (14) to feed particles into said confined volumn, and means (15,16) to extract particles therefrom;

said extraction means being located at mutually different radial distances from the central axis of the cylindrical vessel.

3. A device according to claim 1 wherein the closed vessel (l0, 11, 12) is essentially cylindrical and has circular end pieces;

and the electrodes comprise a plurality of rings located on at least one of the end pieces and facing the inside of the cylindrical vessel.

4. A device according to claim 3 wherein the electrode rings are closed, concentric rings.

5. A device according to claim 3 wherein the source includes a tapped voltage divider, the rings are concentric, and sequential rings are connected to sequential tap points on the voltage divider to provide said gradient of the electrical field.

6. A device according to claim 1 wherein the mag netic filed extends axially of the cylindrical vessel.

Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4085039 *May 24, 1976Apr 18, 1978Allen James WMagnetic separator with helical classifying path
US4093427 *Jan 23, 1975Jun 6, 1978Schlenker R FMethod for separating isotopes
US4217213 *Aug 14, 1978Aug 12, 1980Siemens AktiengesellschaftDevice for the separation of minute magnetizable particles, method and apparatus
US6096220 *Nov 16, 1998Aug 1, 2000Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Plasma mass filter
US6203710 *Feb 22, 1999Mar 20, 2001David D. WoodbridgeLiquid decontamination method and apparatus
US6214223 *Jul 14, 1999Apr 10, 2001Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Toroidal plasma mass filter
US6217776Jan 5, 2000Apr 17, 2001Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Centrifugal filter for multi-species plasma
US6235202Aug 8, 2000May 22, 2001Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Tandem plasma mass filter
US6235250Sep 29, 1999May 22, 2001Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Nuclear waste separator
US6248240Dec 15, 1999Jun 19, 2001Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Plasma mass filter
US6251281Nov 30, 1999Jun 26, 2001Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Negative ion filter
US6251282Dec 8, 1999Jun 26, 2001Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Plasma filter with helical magnetic field
US6287463Nov 15, 1999Sep 11, 2001Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Collector cup
US6293406Aug 21, 2000Sep 25, 2001Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Multi-mass filter
US6303007Nov 15, 1999Oct 16, 2001Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Plasma injector
US6304036Aug 8, 2000Oct 16, 2001Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.System and method for initiating plasma production
US6322706 *Jul 14, 1999Nov 27, 2001Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Radial plasma mass filter
US6326627Aug 2, 2000Dec 4, 2001Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Mass filtering sputtered ion source
US6396223Apr 21, 2000May 28, 2002Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Cusp filter
US6398920Feb 21, 2001Jun 4, 2002Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Partially ionized plasma mass filter
US6403954Dec 8, 1999Jun 11, 2002Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Linear filter
US6410880Jan 10, 2000Jun 25, 2002Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Induction plasma torch liquid waste injector
US6515281Jun 23, 2000Feb 4, 2003Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Stochastic cyclotron ion filter (SCIF)
US6541764Mar 21, 2001Apr 1, 2003Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Helically symmetric plasma mass filter
US6576127Feb 28, 2002Jun 10, 2003Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Ponderomotive force plug for a plasma mass filter
US6632369Jul 11, 2001Oct 14, 2003Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Molten salt collector for plasma separations
US6639222Nov 15, 2001Oct 28, 2003Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Device and method for extracting a constituent from a chemical mixture
US6686800Feb 13, 2001Feb 3, 2004Quantum Applied Science And Research, Inc.Low noise, electric field sensor
US6719909Apr 2, 2002Apr 13, 2004Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Band gap plasma mass filter
US6723248Aug 16, 2002Apr 20, 2004Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.High throughput plasma mass filter
US6726844Jun 12, 2002Apr 27, 2004Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Isotope separator
US6730231 *Apr 2, 2002May 4, 2004Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Plasma mass filter with axially opposed plasma injectors
US6787044Mar 10, 2003Sep 7, 2004Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.High frequency wave heated plasma mass filter
US6797176Jul 3, 2003Sep 28, 2004Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Plasma mass filter with inductive rotational drive
US6939469Dec 16, 2002Sep 6, 2005Archimedes Operating, LlcBand gap mass filter with induced azimuthal electric field
US6956217Feb 10, 2004Oct 18, 2005Archimedes Operating, LlcMass separator with controlled input
US6961601Jun 11, 2003Nov 1, 2005Quantum Applied Science & Research, Inc.Sensor system for measuring biopotentials
US7088175Aug 14, 2003Aug 8, 2006Quantum Applied Science & Research, Inc.Low noise, electric field sensor
US7141968Oct 7, 2004Nov 28, 2006Quasar Federal Systems, Inc.Integrated sensor system for measuring electric and/or magnetic field vector components
US7141987Oct 7, 2004Nov 28, 2006Quantum Applied Science And Research, Inc.Sensor system for measurement of one or more vector components of an electric field
US7173437Jun 9, 2005Feb 6, 2007Quantum Applied Science And Research, Inc.Garment incorporating embedded physiological sensors
US7245956Aug 17, 2004Jul 17, 2007Quantum Applied Science & Research, Inc.Unobtrusive measurement system for bioelectric signals
US7831008May 12, 2008Nov 9, 2010General AtomicsMicrowave-powered pellet accelerator
US8379789Jul 27, 2011Feb 19, 2013Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (Proprietary) LimitedNuclear plant
EP1001450A2 *Nov 1, 1999May 17, 2000Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Plasma mass filter
EP1107283A2 *Sep 15, 2000Jun 13, 2001Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Negative ion filter
EP1115142A2 *Jul 14, 2000Jul 11, 2001Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Plasma mass filter
EP1115143A2 *Sep 15, 2000Jul 11, 2001Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Plasma filter with helical magnetic field
EP1119018A2 *Sep 15, 2000Jul 25, 2001Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.Inverted orbit filter
EP1723665A1 *Feb 9, 2005Nov 22, 2006Archimedes Operating, LLCMass separator with controlled input
WO2005078761A1Feb 9, 2005Aug 25, 2005Archimedes Operating LlcMass separator with controlled input
Classifications
U.S. Classification209/12.1, 96/2, 210/223, 209/722, 209/725, 209/227
International ClassificationH02K44/04, H02K44/00, B03C1/02, B03C1/023
Cooperative ClassificationH02K44/04, B03C1/023
European ClassificationB03C1/023, H02K44/04