Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3725888 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateApr 3, 1973
Filing dateApr 5, 1971
Priority dateApr 5, 1971
Also published asDE2216236A1, DE2216236B2
Publication numberUS 3725888 A, US 3725888A, US-A-3725888, US3725888 A, US3725888A
InventorsSolomon E
Original AssigneePyrotector Inc
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Detector system
US 3725888 A
An intruder detector system that utilizes both a Doppler effect detector system and an optical detector system monitoring the same space. An alarm output signal produced by either detector under alarm conditions is prevented from activating an alarm unless the other detector also is producing an alarm signal.
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

36794- sss: SR ge a I: W 24514 XR anamaaa ge United States Patent 1191 1111 3,725,888 Solomon [451 Apr. 3, 1973 v S /5 [54] DETECTOR SYSTEM 3,564,529 2 1971 Kaufman et al. ..340 258 1) 9 I 3,573,8l7 4/1971 Akers ..340/258 52-; [75] Inventor Elias Duxbury Mass 3,242,486 3/1966 Corbell.... ..340/258 A [73] Assignee: Pyrotector, Incorporated, Hingham, 3,560,950 2/1971 Peters ..340/258 D Z3? Mass. fit [22] Filed. Apr 5 1971 Primary Examiner-David L. Trafton Attorney-Robert E. Ross fi a [21] Appl. No.: 131,222 )5 57 ABSTRACT [52] CL "340/258 340/258 6 An intruder detector system that utilizes both a DOP. [51] Int CL Gosh 13/16 Gosh 3/18 pler effect detector system and an optical detector Field of 3 0 25 R A, B, 25 system monitoring thfi same space. An alarm output signal produced by either detector under alarm conditions is prevented from activating an alarm unless the 5 References Cited other detector also is producing an alarm signal.

UNITED STATES PATENTS 3 Claims, 1 Drawing g r 3,010,102 11/1961 Ketchledge et al 340/228 S X ie i a 10 *1 l i T V50 C/fiCW/T I man/route)? k 5 THAAljH/ITER 2 0R, R l Tam/rowan I CE/V AMPLIFIER may I MIXER DUE-CT wrscmro/e I 1 M0 ALARM 5 N; I qA-rs ACTUATOR l AMPLIFIEQ Pl/DI'OELECTRIC 4 ms: l E R s T DISCEIMINATDR OUT, /I 0 rzcm V $/AT f I Em AND ENTRY oeuy 1 1 BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION a. Field of the invention This invention relates to electronic intruder detection devices.

b. Description of the prior art One form of widely used device for intruder detection utilizes an accoustic generator that creates a pattern of standing waves in a space to be protected. Reflected waves are received by the detector, and if the reflected waves maintain a predetermined frequency, no alarm signal is created. However the motion of a person in the room or air currents due to heat from a fire will cause a change in the frequency received, and this change is utilized to actuate an alarm.

Another device of this type utilizes microwaves in the electro-magnetic spectrum, with the method of operation being substantially as described with respect to the acoustic system.

Although such devices have achieved considerable commercial success, they have the disadvantage of being extremely subject to false alarms from extraneous sounds from both inside and outside the protected space. For example, outside sounds such as automobile engine noises, sirens, thunder, airplanes, or construction equipment can contain sufficient high frequency components to cause an alarm response of the acoustic type of detector. Internally, sounds of thermostats or other devices with contacts, electric motors, telephones, doorbells, or the motion of animals such as cats, rodents, or guard dogs can cause an alarm response, as can air turbulence due to hot air heating systems.

In the case of the microwave type of detector, a false alarm may be caused by spurious R.F. signals or motion of a person or article in an area beyond the confined space, since the transmission passes through any wall not made of metallic material.

Although some of these causes of false alarms can often be prevented by the use of delay features in the alarm portion of the circuit, or by controlling the sensitivity of the device, such features reduce the effectiveness of the device in detecting intruders.

Another type of volumetric space surveillance system (as opposed to a line of sight type of detector) is an optical detector which utilizes the rate of change of light intensity to actuate an alarm. This type of device is also prone to false alarms, due to unpredictable sudden changes in ambient illumination such as head lights from passing cars, lightning, lightbulb failure or momentary power failure.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In accordance with the present invention a detector system comprises-a Doppler effect intruder detector and a volumetric optical detection system combined to monitor the same space. The outputs of the detectors are connected to an AND gate, with the output of the AND gate being connected to alarm actuating means. Phenomena that cause false alarms in Doppler effect detectors and those that cause false alarms in optical detection are so different that the possibility is very slight that phenomena that affect each will occur simultaneously.

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING The single FIGURE of the drawing is a block diagram illustrating a detector system embodying the features of the invention.

DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT Asillustrated in the drawing a detector system embodying the features of the invention comprises a Doppler effect detector 10 and a photo-electric detector 12 positioned for surveillance of the same space to be protected from intruders. The detectors l0 and 12 cooperate to energize an alarm on detecting an intruder or other condition in a manner to appear herein after.

Both Doppler effect detectors and optical detectors are known in the art and the specific types of detectors to be described are by way of example only, since other types may be used without departing from the scope of the invention.

The detector 10 comprises a tuned circuit resonating at, for example, 40 kHz which drives a piezq-ele ctric tranducer transmitter, which radiates at 40 kl lz into the protected space. When the detector is in use, a

standing wave pattern of 40 kHz is established in the space, a portion of which is reflected back to the transducer, which also has a resonating frequency of 40' kHz. The output of the receiver transducer is fed into an amplifier and mixer which also receives a 40 kHz signal from the tuned circuit driver. If there is no disturbance in the ultra-sonic waves, the frequency received at the receiver transducer and therefore at the mixer is the same as the 40 kHz signal from the tuned circuit driver. However if there is any movement of a body in the protected space a different frequency is received at the receiver transducer, which when amplified and compared with the driver frequency in the mixer, produces a beat frequency. The detector allows this beat frequency to filter through to the delay integrator, which insures that the beat frequency is present for a predetermined time before transmitting a signal to the AND gate.

In the illustrated embodiment theoptical detector system 12 comprises a photo-electric detector which is positioned to receive ambient light from the same space into which the Doppler effect system 10 is transmitting, an amplifier and discriminator which receives the signal from the photo-electric detector, and an output pulse generator which feeds an alarm pulse to the AND gate.

The photo-electric devices may be photoresistive or photo-generative and may have various optical filters to make the device insensitive to light of certain band widths.

The discriminator responds to a predetermined change in illumination reaching the photo-electric detector to provide an output pulse to the AND gate.

As illustrated schematically, if the rate of change of the light received by the photo-electric detector is below a certain value, no signal is transmitted to the pulse output generator whereas if the rate of change is above said minimum value a signal is transmitted to the pulse output generator to produce an alarm pulse to the AND gate.

If both the Doppler effect detector and the optical detector provide an output signal at the same time, an output alarm signal will be transmitted to the alarm activating device, However the AND gate will not allow the alarm to be actuated if only one detector provides an output signal.

Although each detector in the above described system is subject to the false alarm conditions previously described, no single false alarm cause will cause a false alarm in both detectors simultaneously. The probability that a false alarm condition that affects the Doppler type detector will occur simultaneously with a false alarm condition that affects the optical detector, if not absolutely non-existent is very slight. The inhibiting of each detector by the other does not, however reduce the effectiveness of the detector in providing an alarm in response to an intruder.

in the illustrated embodiment of the invention, an entry and exit delay feature may be provided between the AND gateand the alarm actuating device to allow personnel time to leave the protected space after energizing the detector system, without actuating the alann, and when re-entering, to allow them time to de-energize the system before the alarm is actuated by their presence.

Since certain obvious changes may be made in the embodiment described herein, it is intended that all matter contained herein be interpreted in an illustrative and not a limiting sense.


1. An intruder detector system, comprising first and second detector devices arranged to monitor substantially the same confined space, each of said detector devices being responsive to the entry of an intruder to provide an output signal, one of said detectors being responsive to a Doppler effect to produce its output signal, the other being responsive to a change in light intensity to produce its output signal, means receiving the output of each of said detectors, said means producing an-alarm output signal only when said detectors produce an output signal simultaneously.

2. A detector system comprising a detection device of the type utilizing a change in frequency to cause an alarm output signal and a detector device utilizing a rate of change in light intensity to cause an alarm output signal, said detector devices being arranged to monitor substantially the same confined space, an AND gate, the output of said detectors being connected to said AND gate, the output of said AND gate being connected to an alarm actuating device, whereby the AND gate transmit a signal to the alarm actuating device only if both alarm devices produce an alarm output signal simultaneously.

3. A detector system, comprising a first detector producing an alarm signal output in response to a change in frequency between a transmitted signal and a received signal, and a second detector arranged to monitor at least a portion of a confined space being monitored by the first detector, said second detector being responsive to a predetermined change of light intensity to cause an alarm signal output, and means preventing said alarm signal output from either detector from actuating an alann unless the other detector also simultaneously generates an alarm signal output.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3010102 *Jul 5, 1947Nov 21, 1961Bell Telephone Labor IncCombination radar and thermalenergy detection system
US3242486 *Apr 20, 1962Mar 22, 1966Johnson Service CoIntrusion detection system
US3560950 *Mar 2, 1967Feb 2, 1971Peters DuaneWarning signal for swinging doors
US3564529 *Oct 21, 1965Feb 16, 1971Us NavyElectrostatic field rate detector
US3573817 *Feb 28, 1968Apr 6, 1971North American RockwellMonitoring system
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3801978 *Jul 20, 1972Apr 2, 1974E Systems IncUltrasonic-microwave doppler intrusion alarm system
US3866198 *Oct 17, 1973Feb 11, 1975Leopold CohenUltrasonic intrusion detection systems employing turbulence discrimination
US3898640 *Jul 24, 1973Aug 5, 1975Romen Faser KunststoffMethod and apparatus for providing space security based upon the acoustical characteristics of the space
US3922660 *Dec 12, 1974Nov 25, 1975American District Telegraph CoVolumetric intrusion alarm using both Doppler and net-change signal processing
US4010459 *Nov 5, 1975Mar 1, 1977Borge SchlogerSystems for the detection of moving objects within a survey area by microwave diffraction
US4087814 *Dec 27, 1976May 2, 1978Ernst SpirigIntruder alarm systems
US4141091 *Dec 10, 1976Feb 27, 1979Pulvari Charles FAutomated flush system
US4331952 *Sep 22, 1980May 25, 1982American District Telegraph CompanyRedundant sensor adapter
US4401976 *Jan 14, 1981Aug 30, 1983Stadelmayr Hans GMultiple sensor interconnected alarm system responsive to different variables
US4710750 *Aug 5, 1986Dec 1, 1987C & K Systems, Inc.Fault detecting intrusion detection device
US4833450 *Apr 15, 1988May 23, 1989Napco Security Systems, Inc.Fault detection in combination intrusion detection systems
US4940967 *Aug 31, 1989Jul 10, 1990Burle Technologies, Inc.Balanced digital infrared detector circuit
US4942384 *Mar 31, 1989Jul 17, 1990Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd.Composite type crime preventive sensor
US5189393 *Jun 7, 1991Feb 23, 1993The Watt Stopper Inc.Dual technology motion sensor
US5475365 *Dec 2, 1994Dec 12, 1995C & K Systems, Inc.Methods and apparatus for intrusion detection having improved immunity to false alarms
US5581236 *Jul 1, 1994Dec 3, 1996C & K Systems, Inc.Methods and apparatus for intrusion detection having improved immunity to false alarms
US5821642 *Nov 4, 1996Oct 13, 1998Hubbell IncorporatedArc prevention circuit for a mechanical switch
US5986357 *Feb 4, 1997Nov 16, 1999Mytech CorporationOccupancy sensor and method of operating same
US6078253 *Oct 15, 1997Jun 20, 2000Mytech CorporationOccupancy sensor and method of operating same
US6415205Aug 26, 1999Jul 2, 2002Mytech CorporationOccupancy sensor and method of operating same
US6538570Jun 22, 2000Mar 25, 2003Honeywell InternationalGlass-break detector and method of alarm discrimination
US7113092Nov 12, 2003Sep 26, 2006Qinetiq LimitedFerromagnetic object detector
US7194209 *Aug 21, 2003Mar 20, 2007Xantech CorporationInterference resistant infrared extension system
US7411489Jul 1, 2005Aug 12, 2008Cooper Wiring Devices, Inc.Self-adjusting dual technology occupancy sensor system and method
US7486193Feb 6, 2006Feb 3, 2009Cooper Technologies CompanyOccupancy sensor network
US7489128Mar 11, 2002Feb 10, 2009Kopp Keith AMRI protector
US7541924Feb 6, 2006Jun 2, 2009Cooper Technologies CompanyInfrared occupancy sensor
US7680283Feb 7, 2005Mar 16, 2010Honeywell International Inc.Method and system for detecting a predetermined sound event such as the sound of breaking glass
US7777632Feb 6, 2006Aug 17, 2010Cooper Technologies CompanyAcoustic occupancy sensor
US8044336Feb 1, 2006Oct 25, 2011Pyronix LimitedDetector and optical system
US8063375 *Jun 22, 2007Nov 22, 2011Intel-Ge Care Innovations LlcSensible motion detector
US8148989Jan 27, 2009Apr 3, 2012Keith KoppFerromagnetic detection enhancer compatible with magnetic resonance
US8164437Feb 2, 2006Apr 24, 2012Pyronix LimitedDetection apparatus
US8389924Sep 23, 2011Mar 5, 2013Pyronix LimitedDetector and optical system
US20030171669 *Mar 11, 2002Sep 11, 2003Kopp Keith A.MRI protector
US20040135687 *Nov 12, 2003Jul 15, 2004Qinetiq LimitedFerromagnetic object detector
US20050206515 *Mar 22, 2004Sep 22, 2005Alexander PakhomovSystems for protection against intruders
US20060177071 *Feb 7, 2005Aug 10, 2006Honeywell International, Inc.Method and system for detecting a predetermined sound event such as the sound of breaking glass
US20070182580 *Feb 6, 2006Aug 9, 2007Cooper Technologies CompanyOccupancy sensor network
US20070182581 *Feb 6, 2006Aug 9, 2007Cooper Technologies CompanyAcoustic occupancy sensor
US20070183329 *Feb 6, 2006Aug 9, 2007Cooper Technologies CompanyNetworking of switchpacks
US20080272281 *Feb 1, 2006Nov 6, 2008Pyronix LimitedDetector and Optical System
US20090167307 *Jan 27, 2009Jul 2, 2009Keith KoppFerromagnetic detection enhancer
USRE33824 *Oct 30, 1989Feb 18, 1992 Fault detecting intrusion detection device
DE3911180A1 *Apr 6, 1989Oct 19, 1989Matsushita Electric Works LtdMeldevorrichtung zur verhuetung von straftaten mittels eines verbund-sensorsystems
EP0147925A1 *Oct 9, 1984Jul 10, 1985C & K Systems, Inc.Combination infrared microwave intrusion detector
EP0255812A2 *Jul 29, 1987Feb 10, 1988ELKRON S.p.A.Monitoring device with infrared and radio-frequency sensor components
EP0276306A1 *May 12, 1987Aug 3, 1988Denning Mobile Robotics, Inc.Intrusion detection system
EP0367402A1 *Sep 28, 1989May 9, 1990C & K Systems, Inc.An intrusion detection system and a method therefor
WO2004044620A1 *Nov 5, 2003May 27, 2004Qinetiq LtdFerromagnetic object detector
WO2008061496A1Nov 13, 2007May 29, 2008S M S Smart Microwave SensorsMethod and radar arrangement for monitoring a monitoring area
U.S. Classification340/522, 367/94, 340/555
International ClassificationG01S13/56, G08B13/189, G08B13/24, G01S13/00
Cooperative ClassificationG08B13/2494, G08B13/24, G08B13/189, G01S13/56
European ClassificationG01S13/56, G08B13/189, G08B13/24, G08B13/24C2
Legal Events
Oct 9, 1990ASAssignment
Effective date: 19891018
Oct 9, 1990AS03Merger
Effective date: 19891018
Jun 18, 1990ASAssignment
Effective date: 19900605
Feb 8, 1983AS02Assignment of assignor's interest
Effective date: 19830103
Owner name: PYROTECTOR, INC.
Feb 8, 1983ASAssignment
Effective date: 19830103