Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3728075 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateApr 17, 1973
Filing dateApr 13, 1971
Priority dateApr 13, 1971
Publication numberUS 3728075 A, US 3728075A, US-A-3728075, US3728075 A, US3728075A
InventorsCannan B
Original AssigneeServicemaster Ind
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Method of shampooing carpet on location
US 3728075 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

April 17, 1973 B. M. CANNAN METHOD OF SHAMPOOING CARPET ON LOCATION Filed April 13. 1971 I N VEN TOR. BER/VAR@ M. CAN/VA N A 7 70m/E yg United States Patent Ofiice 3,72875 Patented Apr. 17, 1973 US. Cl. 8--147 10 Claims ABSTRACT F THE DISCLOSURE Shampooing pile carpets on-location using mopheads made from a combination of seventy percent nylon, twenty percent cotton and ten percent rayon yarns. The looped yarns are aligned transversely to the direction in which the mop travels. The mop configurations are either circular, for use with rotary carpet shampoo devices or cylindrical for use with revolvingr drum It-ype shampoo devices. In using either of said devices a liquid detergent in predetermined quantities is applied to the carpet, and the mophead is mechanically moved over the wetted area to shampoo the pile. The resilient nylon fibers sustain the weight of the device and provide an aggressive scrubbing action helping to release the soil from the fibers. The absorbent cellulosic yarns in the mop soak up the soiled liquid detergent.

THE PRIOR ART On-location carpet cleaning is the series of processes applied to a permanently placed carpet which removes soil accumulations while preserving the color and fiber characteristics, restores the pile to an upraised condition consistent with the original pattern; all within the limits of previous usage, care, installation, age factors, at the same time keeping the soiling rate equal to or less than that of the carpet when newly placed.

The term carpet cleaning generally refers to carpet care methods employing liquids as compared to maintenance routines which are limited to dry soil extraction methods such as vacuuming, pile lofting and incidental treatment of localized spots and stains. These latter maintenance routines are incomplete in that they remove the loose dry soils while leaving behind the film-forming soils which are attached to the fibers. Carpet cleaning methods, on the other hand, remove both the loose dry soils and the attached soil films. This series of processes involves introducing a liquid with deterging and dissolving characteristics for these latter type filming soils. In addition, while the carpet pile fibers are in a damp and lubricated state, they can be caused by pile lofting and combing to be reoriented (even more so than in the previous day agitation) from a crushed and traffic distorted state to a uniform state more near their original configuration. This reorientation causes even more soil previously trapped among these tangled fibers to be freed and capable of removal either during the shampoo process or later, when the carpet has dried, by a dry vacuuming process.

One of the restricting factors in all care routines in onlocation carpet maintenance is that any process and apparatus must be applied from the upper at-surface face of the pile and any soil withdrawn from the depths of the pile must be taken up through the pile and removed from the at-surface level. In carpet cleaning, where liquids are introduced, they too must be introduced from this at-surface level, worked down into the pile and then withdrawn along with the loosened soil residues back up through and away from this top pile face. The soil removal processes for reaching deep down into the pile are many times multiplied in ditiicultiy in proportion to the actual depth of the pile. In the actual present state of the art the practical techniques for reaching this deepdown soil are imperfect and approach impracticability CJI when the difficulties are compounded by backing materials in the carpet which are absorbent and porous and allow soil and liquids to penetrate below the backing face into the cushion or onto the floor surface below. Thus, any liquids which are introduced into a carpet pile, be they water-based detergents or solvents, must have the characteristic of drying to a state where they will not form a tacky film residue which will attract and hold onto soil as it reaccumulates, either by traffic walk-off or from the atmospheric condition.

The carpet cleaning methods most commonly used are outlined below:

(l) Rotary brush shampoo method An effective practical method in widespread use today involves pile lofting and dry vacuuming of loose soils prior to shampooing. The shampooing is done with a water-base detergent wherein a shampoo machine with a rotary nylon brush is used to speread the shampoo liquid fed from a tank afiixed to the machine, mechanically agitate the fibers and loosen the soil film. The upper pile fibers in contact with the brush bristles are actually scrubbed by the bristles. Those fibers below and out of direct contact with the bristles are caused by the fiexing action of the resilient bristles ot wipe against each other and thus assist the detergent in loosening and capturing the soil. -Upon evaporation of the Water and other possible volatile solvents, the suspended soil and detergent residues are vacuumed away as dry soil. A second pile brushing or loting While the carpet is still damp and lubricated realigns fibers and yarns into an upraised state which restores the carpet to a near normal and pleasing appearance and also serves to speed drying. It also causes trapped soil to be freed for removal during the vacuuming process after the carpet is dry. Liquid shampoos are applied at rates ranging from SAO gallon per hundred square feet to 1%@ gallon per hundred square feet under average residiental type soil conditions on which this method is considered to be effective and practical. Drying time (a function of ambient humidity/ temperature conditions and fiber type) can vary from four hours to sixteen hours. vacuuming after shampooing while the carpet is still mostly damp can remove already dried detergent/ soil residues (termed soil crystals by some) at or near the pile surface, but the main soil crystal removal is accomplished after a thorough drying period, usually of twenty-four hours minimum.

(2) Drum type dry foam methods Another carpet cleaning method involves a carpet shampoo machine with a drum-type nylon brush which is operated in straight line paths back and forth over a carpet. The soil removal processes are fsimilar to that of the rotary brush type machine described before. Typically the carpet is first vacuumed with an upright vacuum to remove loose soil. Then the shampoo process is begun. The typical machine is fitted with a detergent storage tank and a foam generating assemblage, usually a small air compressor and a carburetor which intermixes air and detergent with especially high foaming characteristics. The pregenerated foam is applied to the carpet from the revolving brush as it is moved over the carpet and the pile fibers agitated and the foam worked over and into the pile. Some machines have a vacuum attachment to accumulate foam from the pile surface. This is done in a separate pass. The detergent is applied at rates ranging from 1/10 gallon to 710 gallon per hundred square feet. Because of this very light application the carpet can be dry in one hour. The soil conditions for which this method is effective must 'be restricted to the at-surface level. More 3 deeply soiled carpets treated with this method appear streaked and irregular in appearance. As in the rotary brush method the dried detergent/soil residue must be in a powdery soil crystal from and be vacuumed away after the carpet is thoroughly dry. The method, although slow and less effective than the rotary brush method, requires less skill and judgment and experience by the operator, and can be operated by said inexperienced personnel with less chance of damage to carpet surfaces.

(3) Hand sponging methods A carpet cleaning method oered by some professional carpet maintenance companies does not employ powdered equipment in the shampoo process but makes use of natural spong'es manually worked by the operator from a hands and knees position. The carpet is lirst vacuumed, usually with an upright type vacuum cleaner, and may be prelofted when considered necessary by the operator. A detergent liquid is placed in a foam generating machine vvhich intermixes air with the water-base detergent. This lather is manually spread over a small section of the carpet by a hand held and directed scoop. The operator has a bucket of warm, clear rinse water into which he immerses the sponge, squeezes it out manually and works the foam over the pile surface. From time to time he rerinses the sponge in the water, transferring loosened soil he has accumulated. The pile is vacuumed, combed and brushed to a uniform appearance while still damp. As in the first two cleaning methods discussed the dried, loosened soil/detergent residues remaining are vacuumed away when the carpet has dried. The actual amount of detergent applied is subject to much latitude and operator judgment. It can range from 2/10 gallon per hundred square feet to approximately 1 gallon per hundred square feet. The carpet can be dry in from two to twelve hours. The method is effective on lightly soiled carpet. More deeply soiled carpets appear irregular and uneven in appearance.

(4) Wet vacuuming This carpet cleaning method typically referred to in the trade as steam cleaning involves removing both loose and film-type soils by introducing proportionately larger quantities of water-based detergents into the pile of the carpet and almost simultaneously withdrawing them along with the thus captured soil by means of vacnum suction through a narrow slot drawn over the pile surface. Typical steam equipment comprises a wheel mounted dolly containing a liquid storage reservoir and a soiled residue accumulating receiver. This unit also contains a pump, a detergent mixture heating element and the vacuum-producing pump or fan assembly. The operating head is attached by hoses to the dolly. The head itself has a row of spray nozzles arranged parallel and within two or three inches of the vacuum intake slot. The spray nozzles are directed so that the liquid is jetted into the pile surface at an angle and in the direction of the vacuum slot so that the uprushing air may immediately entrain these droplets and loosened soil before they fall down and away from that part of the pile where the air has sufficient velocity to keep them airborne, or to strip them and any soil they have loosened or entrained oi at the fibers on which they have impinged. Liquids sprayed outside of this active air zone in the pile remain behind. The detergents are of the low or non-foaming type and are largely made up of water conditioners, typically one or more of the polyphosphates which may be in the moderately high alkaline area, ranging from pH 9.5 up as high as pH 11.5. The operating head, which can weigh up to 50 pounds, is drawn by the operator in parallel paths across the carpet. He controls the feed rate by an adjusting valve in the handle section. Quantities of 5 to 12 gallons per hundred square feet are introduced. Depending on operator technique, fiber characteristics and carpet construction from 11/2 to 4 gallons per hundred square feet may remain behind in the lower levels of the pile and below the backing. Drying may take from 8 hours to 24 hours, and sometimes longer under circumstances of highly absorbent carpet (such as heavy wool pile) and high humidity. The high wetness provides conditions for shrinkage for those carpets with low dimensional 'stability to moisture. Some typical detergent residues do not have the properties of drying to a crystalline state and have been known to increase soiling. The machinery requires a high electrical input over and beyond the limits of standard circuitry and requires seeking out two separately fused circuits.

THE INVENTION The present invention provides a method similar to those described in (l) and (2) above, but instead of using shampoo brushes and permitting all of the loosened soil detergent mixture to dry to the powdered crystalline state, much of it is adsorbed and removed from the carpet as liquid in a wet mop assemblage. In the instance of the rotary carpet shampoo machine this is accomplished by using an adsorbent circular mop-like disc made from particular yarns as an agitator or scrubber rather than the nylon bristle shampoo brush. -In the instance of the drum-type carpet shampoo machine, this is accomplished by using a drum to which is fabric made in a mop-like construction of particular yarns as an agitator or scrubber is attached, rather than using the usual drum-type brush. Both of these machines can operate on electrical circuits fused for residential or commercial standard Wall outlets.

The fiber materials from which the mop is made are critical. 'I'he fibers must be capable of soaking up and retaining a large quantity of soiled detergent solution; they must be suftciently stiff when in a wet state to maintain an open and elastic consistency when subjected to the full Weight of the rotary machine or the drum machine, and of suicient aggressiveness to provide a scrubbing action to the carpet pile surface; they must be suiciently elastic to cause the pile yarns to compress and relax in such a Way as to wipe against each other, thus setting up their own self-scrubbing action, loosening the soil films attached and embedded in and among the fibers; and they must have non-ravelling and non-frying consistencies to withstand both the agitation of the fibers against the carpet pile surface and repeated launderings t0 free them of the adsorbed soil and detergent residues. I have found that the mop should be made from looped yarns, 30% to 90% by weight of which are nylon, with the remainder Cellulosic, namely cotton and/or rayon. Cotton may comprise all of the Cellulosic material present in the mop, but preferably it constitutes from onehalf to three-fourths of the cellulosic fibers, with the remainder being rayon. Rayon will absorb about twice its weight of water while cotton absorbs about one and a half times its weight. Rayon also releases the adsorbed soil more readily than cotton. The wet strength of rayon is not suicient to withstand the abrasion resulting from the scrubbing of the mop against the pile of the carpet. Consequently I prefer that at least one-half of the cellulosic fibers be cotton, because it has excellent wet strength, although its ability to absorb liquid is somewhat less than that of rayon.

The nylon yarns are incorporated to impart elasticity and resiliency to the wet mop so that the yarns can better conform to the pile contours of the carpet pattern, and can loosen the soil uniformly over the irregular surface. The elasticity also provides a continuous compression and decompression of the pile fibers below the contact surface, causing them to wor-k against each other. Cellulosic iibers tend to compact when set to form a feltlike mass which does not have this resiliency or elasticity to penetrate downwardly into the pile. Nylon yarns do contribute somewhat to the adsorptive properties of the mop, the liquids being held primarily by adhesion to the surface of the fibers.

In a preferred mop composition, I use seventy percent nylon, twenty percent cotton and ten percent rayon formed in loops from at least a two-ply yarn. The yarns are distributed uniformly over the face of the porous fabric backing so as to blend the properties of the several fibers over the entire area of the mop in contact with the carpet. I have tested other synthetic fibers as replacements for nylon but found them to be wanting. For example, polyester fibers lose their resiliency after being subjected to continuous exing during the shampooing operation and during laundering. Polyacrylonitrile fibers are too weak. Polyolefin fiber yarns lose their original elastic configuration if the mop is dried at elevated temperatures, which is the procedure usually followed after laundering to remove the soil. Vinyl fibers contain plasticizers which leach out upon contact with the detergent solutions, and are also sensitive to heat damage during drying after laundering.

The backing fabric is also important to the proper functioning of the wet mop assembly, especially in the circular configuration for use with the rotary shampoo machine. The fabric must be porous to allow free flow of shampoo liquids through from the topside of the wet mop as it is applied from the storage tank mounted on the machine. It must be strong to secure the mop yarn stitching from being torn away from the scrubbing or from laundering. It must be dimensionally stable when wetted to maintain the original circular dimension, both in use with shampoo liquids and during laundering. It must be dimensionally stable to the drying temperatures normally used following laundering operations. In the preferred configuration I prefer a non-woven nylon or polyester fiber spun-bonded fabric, reinforced with parallel stitchings of nylon or polyester thread.

The stitching threads used to form the yarn assemblage and the threads used to secure this assemblage to the backings and the threads used to stitch the two opposing faces of the circular mop configuration together must have wet strength characteristics and be resistant to dimensional change or weakening by wetting and shampoo detergents and laundry detergents. The threads must also be resistant to loss of strength from drying temperatures, and must be sufficiently strong to hold the various assemblages together well beyond the projected life of the mop yarn faces. I prefer that either a nylon thread or a polyester thread be used for this purpose.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION Referring now to the accompanying drawings:

FIG. l is a perspective view of a rotary shampoo machine showing the mop of the invention below the rotating disc.

FIG. 2 is a plan view of one form of a mop made in accordance with the invention.

FIG. 3 is a sectional view taken along the line 3 3 of FIG. 2.

FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a mop made in accordance with the invention which is adapted for use on a drum-type shampoo machine.

FIG. 5 is a view like FIG. 2 in which the loops are spirally disposed.

The rotary machine comprises a housing enclosing a perforated rotating disc 11 driven by a motor 12. A handle 18 extends upwardly from the housing 10 and carries a tank 14 containing liquid detergent. The detergent ows downwardly through the tube 16 is released through valve means 17 to the space above the rotary disc 11. The detergent passes through the perforations in the disc 11 and the bristles of the brush 20, secured to the disc, thus supplying cleaning solution to the surface of the carpet as the brush rotates. The apparatus described thus far is commercially available on the market. The mop of the invention is adapted to be interposed between the brush 20 and the carpet. The weight of the machine causes the bristles to become embedded in the fibers on the surface of the mo-p 22 so that they become coupled. When the brush 20 rotates, the mop rotates at the same speed because the friction between the brush and the surface of the mop is greater than the friction between the mop and the surface of the carpet. Although a close trimmed Very dense brush 20 has been shown as the coupling means, any rough surface, such as a molded rubber disc having splines projecting therefrom, will serve satisfactorily to couple the mop to the rotating disc. If desired, the mop may be mechanically secured to the disc 11.

Referring now to FIGS. 2 and 3, it will be noted that the mop is made from an assemblage of loops of yarn 24 secured to a backing material 26, which is porous, such as a spun-bonded nylon fabric of 4 to 6 o2. weight. The mop yarn loop assemblage is secured to the backing 26 by means of threads 28 which are disposed midway between the ends of the loops and circumferentially on the face of the circular backing. In the particular construction shown in FIG. 2 there are three concentric rows of loops covering the face of the backing 26. In place of concentric rows the loops may be stitched in a continuous spiraling pattern from an inner open circle ending in a fully closed circle at the ante circumference of the mop, is shown in FIG. 5. As indicated, in the preferred construction ten percent of the loops are rayon, twenty percent are cotton and seventy percent are nylon. 'Ihe compositions may be varied to change the properties as desired within the specified ranges. It is not essential that every tenth fiber loop be rayon, for example, but it is desirable to locate the dierent fibers as uniformly as possible over the entire area of the circular fabric backing 26. It is also possible to intermix the fibers prior to spinning so 'as to arrive at a single 3 ply yarn containing all three fibers in the prescribed lblend such as the above preferred mixture of nylon, 20% cotton and 10% rayon. I prefer that the fiber loops be disposed transversely of the direction in which the mop moves. I prefer that the fiber loops be disposed radially. The sides of the loops scrub against the pile of the carpet when the mop is rotated.

It will also be noted that the mop construction 4of FIG. 2 has loops on both sides of the double porous fabric backing 26. This serves two purposes. First the bristles or fingers depending from the rotary scrubber have something to look into; and secondly, the mop may be turned over when it has become soiled on one side and the other side used to continue the shampooing operation until it has become soiled.

In FIG. 4, I have shown a modified form of mop in the shape of a sleeve which is adapted to fit over the drum of a drum-type scrubber. In this construction, the securing threads 30 run spirally of the circumference of the sleeve. Again, the loops of yarn are disposed transversely of the direction which the drum travels.

In using the apparatus of the invention to shampoo carpets, it is required first of all to preloft the pile and vacuum up the loose debris. After this has been done, a solution of liquid detergent may be sprayed on a limited area of the carpet to be cleaned. Alternatively, the solution can be added through the mop from the tank 14 on the rotary shampoo machine. Th-e rotary machine is mo-ved from side to side in one direction and then to and fro in the other direction over the same area to work the mop into the fibers. Alternatively, the motion may consist of over-lapping circles. Whatever the direction of motion, it is desirable that the mop make two passes over the same area in different directions. An important improvement attributable to the invention is the immediate removal of soil as it is released by the detergent action. And when the carpet has dried, a considerable amount of loosened soil formerly left behind, such as by la brush method, has already been removed. The dry vacuuming operation serves to remove that soil which has been loosened by the mechanical movement of the fibers themselves against each other and which was not in direct contact with the mop.

A detergent solution suitable for use in connection with this invention contains an anionic surfactant, alcohol, brightener dye, formaldehyde bacteria stat, perfume and color. An alkaline builder/water conditioner may be used to adjust the pH to slightly above 7 to increase the rate at which the soil is loosened from the iibers. Modifications in the detergent solution may be made by ladding other ingredients, such as brown stain-preventing materials and solvent builders, such as chlorinated hydrocarbons to assist in removing grease and resinous materials.

The intensity of the cleaning procedure is modied to be commensurate with the condition of the carpet. To pick up at-surface level soil accumulations, a relatively small amount of detergent solution is applied (Le. 0.2 gallon per hundred square feet of carpet). 'I'his may be sprayed on the carpet, and within tive minutes the rotary scrubbing machine having the mop of the invention is moved over the carpet. To obtain a deeper penetration, the amount of solution should be increased to from 0.5 to 0.8 gallon per hundred square feet. The detergent in these amounts is preferably applied through the face of the mop. For more heavily soiled carpets, the detergent must be applied in the range of 1.0 to 1.5 gallons per hundred square feet, and the rotary mop must be passed over the area a greater number of times to work the solution more deeply into the pile of the carpet. For a salvage operation where the carpet is very heavily soiled, it may be necessary to go to 2.0 to 3.0 gallons per hundred square feet and use a vacuum scavenger tool to remove as much of the soiled champoo solution as possible after shampooing with the rotary mop.

The mop of the invention is superior to a bristle brush in that it is capable of removing the soil immediately upon release from the carpet -pile by the detergent, and additionally, it is less abrasive than the bristles of the brush and does not injure the fibers of the carpet. At the same time, because of the presence of the resilient nylon fibers, it has a strong tlexing ability to cause the bers down below the actual contact level to Work against each other, providing a self-scrubbing mechanical agitation among themselves.

When the mop has become saturated with soiled solu` tion removed from the carpet it is Washed in clean Warm water, wrung out and put back into use.

SPECIFIC EXAMPLE A direct comparison was made between the process of the invention and a prior process using a bristle brush on a soiled wool carpet used in a residence. The pile was lofted and vacuumed over the entire area of the carpet to remove dry, loose soil. The soil removed was weighed and found to amount to about *l ounce per 100 square feet. A diagonal line was drawn from one corner of the carpet to the other to divide it into two areas having a substantially equal degree of soil. The 'lirst area was shampooed with a rotary machine having a nylon bristle brush in contact with the carpet. Detergent solution was applied to the carpet through the bristles at a rate of about 11,41 gallons per 100 square feet. The machine was moved back and forth across the lirst area in one direction and then to and fro in a second pass over the same area but at right angles thereto.

After the carpet area was thoroughly dry which required about 6 hours, at 70 degrees F. and 40% RH., the area was vacuumed to remove dry detergent and soil residue from the iibers. 'Ihe amount of dry residue collected was about '0.2 ounce per 100 square feet.

The second area of the carpet was then shampooed using the same machine and the same detergent solution but the bristle brush was replaced with a round mop as described above having 70% nylon, 20% cotton and 10% rayon fibers. The detergent solution was applied at a rate of 11A gallons per 100 square feet through the mop. The machine was moved back and forth in one direction and then to and fr0 in a second direction to cover the same area in two passes. The mop was removed, rinsed in Warm water, wrung out and put back on the rotary machine from time to time as the soil built up in the mop fibers. The rinse Water was dark and discolored indicating that particles of fine sand, clay and carbonaceous material had been removed by the mop. After the carpet was completely dry, which required about '6 hours, the dry detergent and soil residue remaining on the surface of the fibers was removed by vacuuming. This amounted to about 0.5 ounce per 1'00 square feet.

Visual inspection of the first and second areas indicated that the second area was cleaner and more uniform in texture and pattern. Further, on close observation of the iibers along their entire length they appeared cleaner at the backing level depth and the feel was more like the original carpet than those in the rst area. It was apparent that when the mop was removed and rinsed, a great deal of soil was removed from the carpet which is not the case when a brush is used. Little or no soil is picked up by the bristles of the brush. Consequently, in the brush method all of the loosened soil must be removed by vacuuming after the shampooing operation. The test data indicate that about 21/2 times more soil is removed from the mop-shampooed rug than in the case Where the brush is used. This is in addition to the soil removed to the mop rinse water. It appears that the wet mop, unlike the brush, loosens and frees soil which is trapped in the yarn bundles. It is apparent, therefore, that the method of the invention removes substantially more soil from the carpet than does the conventional method utilizing a bristle brush.

What is claimed is:

1. A method for shampooing carpets containing soil on location which comprises:

(a) supplying detergent solution to the pile of the carpet;

(b) scrubbing the pile with a rotating mop comprising a mixture of nylon yarns and cellulosic yarns in loop form on the front face of the mop to dissolve the soil on the carpet and cause it to be absorbed by the mop as it is released from the carpet;

(c) Washing the absorbed soil from the mop; and

(d) repeating iirst two steps; said cellulosic fibers absorbing said soil and said nylon bers providing resiliency to loosen the soil in the carpet.

2. The method of claim 1 in which said mop comprises about 70% nylon, 20% cotton and 10% rayon.

3. The method of claim 1 in which said mop comprises a circular porous fabric backing and said loops are secured to said backing at a point intermediate the ends of the loops and disposed radially of said backing.

4. A method for shampooing carpets containing soil on location which comprises supplying detergent solution to the pile of said carpet and simultaneously scrubbing the pile with a rotating mop comprising looped yarns on the front face of the mop containing from .3G-% nylon to provide resiliency to loosen soil in the carpet and from 70q10% cellulosic material to adsorb the loosened soi 5. A method as in claim 1 wherein the rotating mop is a circular disc having yarn loops on both the front face and back face of the disc.

6. A method as in claim 5 which includes reversing mop faces when the front face is soiled.

7. A method as in claim 5 wherein the yarn loops on the back face of the mop are engaged with bristles of a rotary scrubber.

8. A method as in claim 4 wherein the rotating mop is a circular disc having yarn loops on both the front face and back face of the disc.

9. A method as in claim 8 which includes reversing the mop faces when the front face is soiled.

10. A method as in claim 9 wherein the yarn loops on the back face of the mop are engaged with bristles of a rotary scrubber.

References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,512,204v 5/1970 .Tagiel -15-98 X 3,531,815 l0/1970 MOSS etal. .l5-230.16 IJEON G. MAC-HLIN, Primary Examiner

Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3886622 *Jan 26, 1973Jun 3, 1975Western Sales & Supply CoTubular buffer element
US4063961 *Apr 26, 1976Dec 20, 1977Howard Lawrence FMethod for cleaning carpet
US4293973 *Oct 22, 1979Oct 13, 1981Schaer ErnstFloor cleaning device
US4418438 *Aug 2, 1982Dec 6, 1983Cutler Barry LRotary carpet cleaning pad
US5077859 *Feb 8, 1990Jan 7, 1992N/S CorporationVehicle washing apparatus
US5142727 *Oct 28, 1991Sep 1, 1992Koester James ACarpet scrubbing bonnet
US5806130 *Jan 7, 1997Sep 15, 1998Pascoe; Graciela C.Decorating tool
US6030464 *Jan 28, 1998Feb 29, 2000Azevedo; StevenMethod for diagnosing, cleaning and preserving carpeting and other fabrics
US6308368 *Dec 1, 1999Oct 30, 2001Patent Kg, CorporationCleaning pad
US9163200 *Dec 20, 2010Oct 20, 2015The Procter & Gamble CompanyLiquid cleaning and/or cleansing composition
US20110150788 *Jun 23, 2011Denis Alfred GonzalesLiquid cleaning and/or cleansing composition
US20110262504 *Oct 27, 2011Geert Andre DeleersnyderLiquid cleaning and/or cleansing composition
EP0899567A1 *Feb 20, 1990Mar 3, 1999Perseptive Biosystems, Inc.Perfusive Chromatography
U.S. Classification8/147, 15/98, 15/230.16, 134/6
International ClassificationA47L11/32, A47L11/00, A47L13/16
Cooperative ClassificationA47L13/16, A47L11/4041, A47L11/4038, A47L11/325
European ClassificationA47L11/40F4, A47L11/40F2, A47L13/16, A47L11/32A
Legal Events
Feb 9, 1987AS02Assignment of assignor's interest
Effective date: 19861230
Effective date: 19861230
Feb 9, 1987ASAssignment
Effective date: 19861230
Feb 2, 1987ASAssignment
Effective date: 19860101