|Publication number||US3736968 A|
|Publication date||Jun 5, 1973|
|Filing date||Nov 25, 1970|
|Priority date||Nov 25, 1970|
|Publication number||US 3736968 A, US 3736968A, US-A-3736968, US3736968 A, US3736968A|
|Original Assignee||Sun Studs|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (70), Classifications (16), Legal Events (1)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
June 5, 11973 United States atet [191 Mason  METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR Primary ExaminerD0nald R. Schran PROCESSING LOGS Attorney-Daniel P. Chernoff and Jacob E. Vilhauer, Inventor:
Howard C. Mason, Oregon City, Oreg.
 ABSTRACT A method and apparatus for processing logs to obtain  Assignee: Sun Studs, Inc., Roseburg, Oreg.
Nov. 25, 1970  Filed:
an optimum amount of wood products of predeter-  Appl. No.: 92,581 mined quality from each log. The method includes the steps of positioning each log along a reference axis, electronically scanning the log to determine certain of its dimensions with respect to the reference axis, computing the center axis of the largest surface of a preselected shape that can be superimposed within the measured dimensions, and repositioning the log with the center axis parallel to an index line such as the 0 2 M133 4 9 M W0; 2 B M :5 4 M W34 4 "4 1N4 Sh C n r a u e n S L m C s t UIF NIH 555 [ll  References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS cutting line of a predetermined processing equipment. Scanning arrangements and processing apparatus are disclosed for practicing the steps of the method in the processing of logs of different diameters.
3,459,246 8/1969 Ottosson...........................144/312R 3,037,538 6/1962 Graham............................144/209A 5 Claims, 7 Drawing Figures Patented June 5, 1973 3 Sheets-Sheet 2 i n 87 [I mall]: 66 75 62 7067"/ 55 F I24 7 HOWARD c. MASON INVENTOR BY /%Z v W ATTY Patented June 5, 1973 3 Sheets-Sheet 5 llllllllllmlllllll M fez FIG. 7
lllllllllllllllllll] HOWARD C. MASON I NVENTOR ATTY.
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING LOGS BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for the processing of logs to produce optimum results. More particularly, the invention is related to a method and apparatus for the processing of logs of different diameters to obtain the maximum amount of salable wood products of a predetermined quality from each log.
In processing logs, such as in peeling veneer or sawing logs into cut lumber, it is desirable to obtain the maximum amount of salable wood products of high quality from each log. New saws and saw arrays, as well as improved methods of treating and softening logs, are continuously being developed to permit the processing of logs with a minimum of wood wastage. However, a major problem still exists in the wood industry in determining how a given log should be divided in an optimum fashion, and then in automatically controlling a predetermined processing equipment to divide the log in the selected fashion.
It is conventional in the lumber industry to reduce logs to cut lumber by means of a saw array, and a saw carriage that is movable with respect to the saw array under the control of an operator. Prior to gripping of a given log in the saw carriage, the log is positioned with its best side up, as determined from a visual inspection by the operator. With the log aligned with its best side up, (i.e., usually the side most free from crooks), the log is gripped in the saw carriage and moved through the saw array repeatedly, with cants or flitches of various widths being removed from the log on each pass as determined arbitrarily by the operator in accordance with certain rules of thumb.
In such practice, many factors are not considered that should enter into a determination of the optimum manner of dividing or breaking down a given log. For example, all logs are tapered from one end to the other. Consequently, some wastage always occurs in producing lumber of regular or rectangular dimensions therefrom. Furthermore, logs are commonly of very irregular and/or elliptical diameter, and include crooks along their length, as well as depressions or extensions in their outer surfaces. For obvious reasons, each of these factors has a significant effect upon the way the log should be divided to achieve optimum results. Accordingly, it would be desirable to eliminate operator judgment from the determination of how to divide each given log, in favor of a system which would precisely and automatically evaluate all the above factors in arriving at an optimum solution.
US. Pat. No. 3,459,246 to Ottosson represents an advance in the art in this regard in that it describes an apparatus for sawing logs that includes an automatically controlled saw array. The Ottosson system further includes means for examining an incoming log with a photocell array to determine the smallest diameter of the log, and uses this information to automatically set the saw array for dividing the log. In other words, in the Ottosson system, each log is sawed in accordance with a programmed cutting schedule determined by the measured minimum diameter of the log. This tends to reduce the wastage that occurs as a result of log taper, and can partially compensate for irregularities in the logs surface that result in a noticeable reduction in the log diameter.
However, the Ottosson system does not include means for repositioning a log after scanning. Consequently, a crooked log of a given diameter is processed in the same fashion as a straight log of the same diameter, with significant wastage resulting. Furthermore, unnecessary wastage results due to the other factors such as elliptical diameter and irregular surface depressions and extensions. Therefore, the Ottosson system does not produce optimum results in the division of logs into cut lumber.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide a method and apparatus for processing logs that overcomes the disadvantages of conventional methods.
It is another object of the invention to provide a method for processing logs to obtain the maximum amount of wood products of a predetermined quality from a given log.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a method for processing logs wherein certain dimensions of each log are accurately measured and the largest surface of a preselected shape that can be superimposed within the measured dimensions is determined.
It is yet a further object of the invention to provide apparatus for repositioning the log with respect to a predetermined processing equipment for maximum utilization of the wood encompassed by such surface.
It is yet a further object of the invention to provide novel apparatus for practicing the method described herein.
The inventor of the method and apparatus described herein has determined that there is an arithmetical best solution for the division of each circular area of a different diameter, such as a log cross section, into rectangular components of a given size or set of sizes, such as the cross sections of pieces of cut lumber. The inventor also has found that to obtain the maximum amount of salable wood products from a given log, it is desirable to measure accurately certain of the dimensions of the log and to determine the largest surface of preselected shape that can be superimposed within the measured dimensions of the log.
If the log is to be reduced to cut lumber or veneer the preselected surface should have parallel sides. Therefore, if the log is measured in two dimensions so that a planar profile of the log can be plotted, a planar surface such as a rectangle or parallelogram is selected. However, if the log is measured in three dimensions so that a volumetric representation of the log can be plotted, a volumetric surface such as a cylinder is selected. In either case, the largest surface of the preselected form that can be superimposed within the measured dimensions of the log encompasses the maximum amount of lumber within the log that can be reduced to cut lumber of the desired rectangular dimensions or reduced to veneer. In the event the log is to be divided into irregular components, an appropriate surface of irregular form could be selected, although this is not a usual requirement of log processing systems.
Accordingly, the above objects of the invention are attained by a method which includes the steps of positioning a log along a reference axis, scanning the log to determine certain of its dimensions, computing the center axis of the largest surface of preselected form (such as a rectangle or a cylinder) that can be superimposed within the measured dimensions of the log, and repositioning the log with the center axis parallel to an index line such as the cutting line of a predetermined processing equipment, allowing maximum use of the wood encompassed within such surface. The method can be utilized in producing cut lumber from logs, or it can be utilized in other log processing operations such as peeling veneer.
Scanning arrangements and an automatically controlled sawmill are described for processing logs of different diameters.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a sawmill adapted to process lumber in accordance with the invention;
FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic side elevation view of a scanner and block charger for positioning logs, of the type used in the apparatus illustrated in FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a partial top elevation view of the scanner and block charger shown in FIG. 2, illustrating the outline of a log as initially positioned in the charger;
FIG. 4 is a diagrammatic view of a scan grid illustrating the axial alignment of a log before scanning and the axial alignment of the same log as repositioned in the charger of FIG. 2 just prior to engagement in the saw carriage;
FIG. 5 is a diagrammatic side elevation view of a cant scanner and charger assembly of the type used for positioning cants in the sawmill disclosed in FIG. 1;
FIG. 6 is a top elevation view of the cant scanner assembly illustrated in FIG. 5 with a cant positioned for scanning therein; and
FIG. 7 is a diagrammatic view of a scan grid illustrating the axial alignment of a cant before scanning and the axial alignment of the same cant as repositioned for further processing upon leaving the cant scanner illustrated in the FIG. 5.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION According to the invention, logs of different diameter are automatically processed to obtain an optimum amount of salable wood products of a predetermined quality from each log. Each log is supplied to a processing apparatus and aligned in a charger along a reference axis. The log is then examined, such as by a photoelectric scanning device, to accurately determine certain of the dimensions of the log.
The scanning can be carried out in numerous ways. One convenient way of scanning the log is to utilize a single array of photoelectric scanning devices generally positioned along the length of the log and oriented to scan the log along one side for measuring the length of the log and the diameter of the log at spaced intervals along the length thereof. This permits the plotting of a two-dimensional representation or planar profile of the log. The term plotting" is used to mean the orientation of data representations within data processing equipment and not physical plotting, although the latter is possible. After the first scanning operation, the log is repositioned in the log processing apparatus and divided into subcomponents such as cants or flitches.
The cants or flitches are then rescanned along a flat side prior to being processed into cut lumber.
Alternatively, a single set of scanning devices can be used, and the log can be periodically rotated beneath the scanning devices, to derive a series of readings that measure the spaced diameters of the log at the different angular positions. This permits the plotting of a three dimensional representation of the log.
In yet another scanning method, two arrays of scanning devices are positioned along the length of the log, oriented in different planes (for example, at right angles to each other) to simultaneously measure the spaced diameters of two different sides of the log. This method of scanning also permits the plotting of a three dimensional representation of the log.
The dimensional data derived from the scanning devices is supplied to an electronic data processing unit for evaluation or plotting. From the dimensional data, the electronic data processing unit produces an output that represents the coordinates of the largest surface of preselected form that can be superimposed within the measured dimensions of the log taking into account certain arbitrary factors that relate to the predetermined acceptable quality of the wood products to be derived from the log. As previously explained, if the scanning device used in one from which a planar profile of the log can be plotted a planar surface with parallel sides, such as a rectangle or parallelogram, is selected. However, if a scanning device is used which produces data from which a volumetric profile of the log can be plotted, a volumetric surface with parallel sides, such as a cylinder, is selected. In addition, the output of the data processing unit includes information representing the coordinates of the center axis of the selected surface. The output signals of the data processing unit are used to control the repositioning of the log in a carriage with the calculated center axis parallel to an index line such as the cutting line of a saw array.
Upon evaluation of the dimensional information the data processing unit also selects, from a number of possible sawing or processing patterns that were previously designed by empirical methods and stored in the processing unit memory, a processing pattern which is the optimum pattern for the largest surface. Such an optimum pattern is the pattern that will yield the maximum amount of wood products of a desired quality from the given log. For example, if it is desired to divide a log into 2 inch X 4 inch studs, the optimum pattern would produce the greatest possible number of studs of acceptable quality from the given log. After selection, the processing program for the selected pattern is automatically carried out by the processing apparatus under the control of the data processing unit.
The method described herein can be used with saw arrays for producing cut lumber from logs, or can be used with other processing apparatus such as that used for peeling veneer.
One preferred apparatus for practicing the method of the invention is illustrated in the drawings in the form of a sawmill especially adapted for sawing logs into cut lumber such as 2 inch X 4 inch studs. The sawmill is designed for processing, continuously, logs of predetermined lengths ranging from 84 to 104 inches and having different diameters, for example ranging from 5 to 50 inches.
In accordance with the method of the invention, each of the logs, referred to hereinafter as blocks, is scanned along one side whereby a planar profile of the dimensions of the log can be plotted, and is regarded as including a volume of usable wood encompassed within the largest parallelogram that can be superimposed within the measured dimensions. The center axis of the optimum surface or parallelogram for a given block is also determined from data obtained during photoelectric scanning of one side of the log. The best or optimum solution for dividing each block is the solution that provides the greatest number of cants of 2 inch or 4 inch width and is determined after making allowance for such lumber grading factors such as acceptable sawing variations, shrinkage, surfacing, saw kerf, and for allowable wane consistent with acceptable grade standards. After a block is divided into cants, the cants are scanned along a flat side whereby a planar profile of each cant is plotted. An optimum solution is then determined for dividing each cant into the maximum number of studs of 2 inch X 4 cross section.
Referring now to FIG. 1, a sawmill is generally illustrated including a block infeed network 11, a charger and scanner array 12, a saw carriage 14, and a twin band mill 15. The sawmill further includes an intermediate transfer conveyer arrangement 16 interconnecting the band mill with a cant scanner generally indicated at 18. A cant guide 19 is arranged between scanner l8 and a cant processing station 20 that includes a 4 inch gang edger 21 and a 2 inch gang edger 22. A conveyor system generally indicated at 25 receives cut lumber from the edgers and precedes an unscrambler 26 and a sorter 27 that ultimately supply sorted lumber to a stacker 29. A data processing unit generally indicated at 30 is provided for automatically controlling all the components of the sawmill in a manner explained hereinafter. It should be understood that the conveyors and chains shown in the drawings are of conventional design and are schematically illustrated to permit simplication of the drawings. Suitable power means, not shown, are associated with each of the conveyors and chains to drive them at the desired speeds in the directions indicated by the arrows.
Referring more particularly to the components mentioned above, block infeed network 11 includes a horizontal block infeed chain 35, and an inclined block infeed chain 36 arranged at the rear of chain 35. infeed chain is adapted to receive blocks deposited thereon, for example by means of a lift truck, and both chains are adapted for transferring blocks therealong.
dicated, at a lower level than block infeed chain 35.
Therefore, operator controlled ejection means, not shown, can be used for transferring reject blocks from the infeed chain to chain 41 for transport to the chipper.
A conveyor 46 and a transfer chain 47 are arranged to communicate between chain 41 and a cutoff saw 49, having an infeed roller set 50 associated therewith. The cutoff saw is a conventional unit adapted for reducing logs to a suitable block size for processing in the chipper. The sawmill also includes an inclined conveyor chain 51 adapted to communicate directly with chipper 34.
Referring now to FIGS. 1-3, the block charger and scanner array 12 are particularly illustrated as comprising a block alignment yoke 55 including two sets of vertically opposed V-members or Vs 56. Each set of Vs includes a fixed lower V 58 and an upper V 59 adapted for power movement between a closed or clamped position shown in solid outline in FIG. 2 and an open or retracted position shown in dotted outline in FIG. 2.
The lower Vs are positioned beneath the upper end of chain 36 and are suitably constructed to receive and support blocks as they leave the end of chain 36. The upper Vs occupy a noninterfering position when retracted and are adapted for gripping and firmly clamping blocks against the lower Vs when closed. The block is centered in the Vs and retained in a fixed position along a lengthwise axis that is arbitrarily used as a reference axis during the scanning operation described hereinafter. It should be apparent that the reference axis is not coincident with the center axis of the log, but the reference axis will always pass through the ends of the log.
The positioning of the upper Vs is automatically controlled by processing unit 30. However, a manually controlled override switch and a block rotating mechanism, not shown, are provided by which the V's can be opened and the block rotated for realignment. This enables each block to be clamped in the block alignment yoke with its best side up as determined by an operator.
A block charger 60 is provided in conjunction with the alignment yoke, having arms 62, 64 positioned outwardly on either side of the V-members to selectively engage the ends of a block clamped within yoke 55. For this purpose, each charger arm includes an enlarged outer portion 66 having spikes 67 fastened thereto. Each charger arm otherwise includes a multiposition stacked hydraulic cylinder set works 70 adapted for extending the length of the arm, independently, in increments, such as 1 [10th inch increments. The upper end 69 of each charger arm is secured to a power assembly 72 controlled by processing unit 30. The power assembly is adapted for moving the arms, selectively, into and out of contact with the ends of a block in yoke 55. in addition, the power assembly is designed to pivot the charger arms upwardly, to the position b shown in dotted outline in FIG. 2, wherein a block carried thereby is generally positioned along a scanning path indicated at 74. The power assembly is further adapted for driving the charger arms and block as a unit whereby the block traverses path 74 through a block scanner 75 and ultimately is rested in a region adjacent saw carriage 14 in position 0 shown in dotted outline in FIG. 2. During this entire phase of the operation the block is positioned along the reference axis, running longitudinally of the block, as determined by the original positioning of the block in the alignment yoke 55.
Referring to FIGS. l-3, the block scanner 75 is particularly illustrated as comprising an upper hood 77 and a lower hood 79 spaced therefrom. The upper hood is positioned above scan line 74 and serves as a housing and reflector for a line source of light 80, such as a neon tube, supported therefrom and extending parallel to the length of a block oriented in the charger arms. Source 80 produces light of appropriate intensity and direction to illuminate the upper half of each block as it traverses the scanner. Lower housing 79 supports a plurality of light responsive elements 82, such as photocells and electrical circuitry associated therewith. The photocells are arranged in a line directly beneath light source 80 for exposure thereby, being interspersed at predetermined intervals along the length of lower hood 79. The photocells are adapted to produce an electrical output in the presence of light and to produce no output in the absence of light. Accordingly, the presence of any portion of a block between light source 80 and each individual photocell can be detected.
In the preferred embodiment illustrated 55 photocells are utilized being spaced at 2 inch intervals over a 110 inch span along the length of the scanner. The output of each photocell is connected to a conventional electronic unit, not shown, for amplifying the output of the photocell and supplying the amplified output to processing unit 30. In the embodiment illustrated, the photocell array is actuated, by means not shown, upon the approach of the charger arms and 550 readings are obtained from each photocell during the traverse of a given block, each reading being taken at a 1 10th inch interval of horizontal travel of the block through the scanner. The data procured from such a scanning sequence is supplied to processing unit 30 and utilized in the calculation and plotting of the block dimensions. From such data processing unit 30 calculates the center axis of the largest parallelogram that can be superimposed within the measured and plotted dimensions of the block and independently controls the operation of the hydraulic set works 70 of each charger arm 62, 64 to realign the block with the center axis parallel to an index line, such as a saw line, prior to engagement in the saw carriage, in a manner explained in more detail hereinafter.
Saw carriage 14 is of conventional design, including spaced-apart carriage arms 83, 84 adapted to engage the ends of a block. Conventional means, not shown, are provided for moving the carriage arms into engagement with a block and for releasing the arms at the end of the sawing program. The carriage arms are formed with knife edges 86 designed to slice into the ends of recesses 87 formed therein, located so as to be centered over ends 66 of the charger arms when a block is engaged by carriage arms 83, 84. This permits gripping of the block in the saw carriage along the calculated center axis prior to release of the block by the charger arms.
Conventional means, not shown, are provided for driving the carriage arms, with a block gripped therein, along an index line such as a carriage center line or saw line 90 between a start position 91 indicated in FIG. 1 and a stop position 92. Intermediate stops at a backstand position 94 are also possible. A conventional slab chipper 95 is provided having heads 96 arranged on either side of the carriage center line between the start and backstand positions for removal of chips from the outer periphery of the blocks. The spacing of the slab chipper heads is automatically controlled by unit 30.
Twin band mill 15 is arranged along center line 90 for removing slabs from either side of a block traversing the center line. The band mill is of conventional design, comprising a pair of band saws 98, 99. Each band saw includes front and rear cutting edges and is adapted for selective lateral movement toward or away from center 7 line 90 in response to signals from processing unit 30.
Conveyors 101, 102 and rollers 103, 104 are adapted to receive cants removed from the blocks on forward passes;'and conveyors 107, 108 are arranged to receive cants removed from the blocks on rearward passes.
A main outfeed conveyor 110 is provided for receiving cants from the band mill. The main conveyor communicates with conveyor 107 by means of a conveyor 112, and with conveyor 108 by means of a series of conveyors 113, 114, 115. A conveyor 116 is adapted to receive cants from conveyors 101,, 102 and deliver them to the main outfeed conveyor. Intermediate transfer conveyor 118 is adapted to receive cants from outfeed conveyor 110 via chain 119 and to deliver such cants to cant scanner 18.
Referring now to FIGS. 5 and 6, the cant scanner is particularly illustrated as including a pair of parallel scan chains 121 each having a plurality of lugs 122 secured thereto in opposed pairs or sets, and a pair of crowder chains 124 arranged parallel with and overlying the scan chains. Cants are received on the scan chains from transfer conveyor 118 and are conveyed thereby through the cant scanner. The cants, such as cant 130, are arranged on the scan chains with their length transverse to the direction of movement of the chain. The cants are also positioned by conventional means with their worst side up, (i .e., the side having the narrowest strip of smooth surface) as illustrated in FIGS. 5 and 6.
Lugs 122 on the scan chains extend above the level of the crowder chains and the crowder chains are operated at a higher speed than the scan chains. Therefore, each cant is maintained in contact with a set of lugs on the cant chain during transfer through the cant scanner. The difference in speeds between the crowder chain and the cant chain is adjusted to a suitable value to maintain the cants in firm contact with the lugs.
The cant scanner comprises a hood 131 supported above the cant chains that serves as a reflector element and as a support for a plurality of detectors such as photocells 133. A pair of light sources such as lamps 135, 136 are supported on either side of the hood arranged to direct light upon the upper surface of each cant as it is guided beneath the hood. The light from these lamps is reflected by the smooth surfaces of the cant upwardly to the photocells. However, any light striking the rough or wane surfaces of the cant is absorbed or diffused whereby the photocells do not receive it. Accordingly, the photocells accurately detect the dimensions of the flat surface on the upper side of the cant. In the preferred embodiment 55 photocells are utilized, arranged in line along a 110 inch axis passing through the center of the scanner hood. As with the block scanner, a scan grid 55 inches wide is utilized, with measurements of the cant being taken every onetenth inch of its transverse of the scan grid. Therefore, the output data from the photocell array can be supplied to unit 30 where it is processed for calculation of an optimum parallelogram of wood of uniform thickness in the cant, as well as the center axis thereof.
A conveyor 140 is provided for receiving cants from the crowder chain, after scanning, and delivering such cants to a conveyor 142 having a set of cant guides 19 associated therewith. Each cant guide includes a stop 147 that is independently positioned by a hydraulic ram 148 at a desired lateral distance from the edge of conveyor 142. The stops of both cant guides are adjusted, under the control of processing unit 30, to contact the leading edge of the cant and to establish a desired alignment for each cant as it is projected onto conveyor 142. Thus, the cants are realigned or repositioned with the center axis of the optimum parallelogram parallel to the cutting line of the edger saws.
A cant chipper 144 is arranged downstream of conveyor 142 for removing any excess portions of the cants prior to sawing, and a conveyor 146 is adapted to receive cants leaving the cant chipper. Four inch gang edger 21 is arranged downstream of conveyor 146. A transfer conveyor 150 and an edger infeed conveyor 152 are arranged upstream of 2 inch gang edger 22. A selector fence 156 of conventional design is associated with conveyor 146. The fence permits passage of 2 inch cants and controls the transfer of 4 inch cants to the transfer chain for delivery to the 2 inch gang edger. Consequently, in the embodiment illustrated, all the cut lumber is reduced to 2 inch X 4 inch studs. It should be apparent, however, that other sawing arrangements are possible without departing from the invention.
An outfeed conveyor 160 receives cut lumber from gang edger 21 and a corresponding outfeed conveyor 162 receives cut lumber from gang edger 22. The cut lumber is delivered to an unscrambler 26 via a transfer conveyor 166, a conveyor 167, and a cross conveyor 169. The unscrambler is of conventional design and provides aligned cut lumber to a sorter 27 via a transfer conveyor 171.
A conventional stacking unit 29 is located downstream of the sorter. The stacking unit serves to automatically stack the cut lumber or studs in predetermined lots for delivery from the sawmill.
The operation of the sawmill described hereinbefore is automatically controlled by means of data processing unit 30, with the exception of certain operator responsive override controls, such as the block rotating control previously mentioned. Blocks are transmitted into the mill for processing via the block infeed conveyors and reach the alignment yoke. When a block drops into the lower Vs of the yoke, the Vs automatically close and clamp the block in a position along a reference axis such as that illustrated in FIG. 3.
Ordinarily, it is preferred that the block be positioned with the best side up. Therefore, after the clamping action, if the operator observes that the block is not so positioned, he can reopen the Vs, rotate the block on the lower Vs until its principal curvature or any excessive surface irregularity is arranged in a vertical plane. The Vs are then permitted to reclamp the block in that position and the block charger arms automatically grip the block at each end, in response to processing unit control signals. The Vs then retract allowing the charger arms to pivot the block upwardly and move it horizontally along the scan path.
As the block approaches the scan zone, the photocell array is actuated and scanning begins at a point corresponding to the zero line of the block scan grid schematically represented in FIG. 4. During the passage of the block through the scan zone, a signal is generated from each photocell for each one-tenth inch of block travel through the 55 inch scan zone. As light is occluded by portions of the block, the recorded signal from each of the blocked photocells changes whereby the profile of the leading edge of the block is detected. When the trailing edge of the block passes by a particular photocell, the signal from that photocell again changes whereby the profile of the trailing edge of the block is detected.
When the last point on the trailing side of the block has passed the photocell array, the data supplied to the processing unit is used in the computation of the maximum parallelogram which can be superimposed within the profile dimensions of the block. The center axis of the maximum parallelogram is also calculated and an electrical signal representing that center axis is transmitted to the charger arm set works. As the charger arms approach a position adjacent the saw carriage, the electrical signal from the processing unit controls the movement of the calibrated stacked hydraulic cylinders comprising the set works. The hydraulic cylinders are extended, individually, until the center axis of the optimum parallelogram is parallel with the sawing line of the saw carriage. The center axis can coincide with the sawing line or it can be offset therefrom by a small distance as is required by the particular cutting program selected.
With the block properly repositioned, the saw carriage arms close on each end of the block and the charger arms are released from the block. The charger arms are then withdrawn to their original location for handling the next block fed into the sawmill.
Referring now to FIG. 4, a planar profile of a typical block is shown in solid outline superimposed upon a grid that schematically represents the block scan grid. The parallelogram having the greatest width that can be superimposed within the block profile is represented by parallelogram X and the center axis of parallelogram X is represented by line Y. Line R represents the position of the reference axis of the block during scanning and line R represents the position of the reference axis after the block is repositioned in the saw carriage arms. It should be apparent that the block is repositioned after scanning so that center axis Y of parallelogram X is parallel to the base of the scan grid which is, in turn, parallel to the saw line. As shown, such repositioning results in the movement of both ends of the block which causes both angular and lateral adjustment of the reference axis.
Before sawing, the processing unit 30 positions the slab chipper heads to convert a calculated amount of slab from each side of the block into chips, in accordance with the appropriate preselected cutting pattern. As previously mentioned, the sawing pattern for each particular block is automatically selected by the processing unit from one of a number of empirically determined cutting patterns that are retained in the processing unit, a different pattern being provided for each l/lOth inch difference in width of the maximum parallelogram.
As the block is passing through the slab chipper, the two band saws of the twin band mill are moved into position for the first cuts, also under the control of the processing unit. When the band saws are positioned, the saw carriage completes its first pass through the band mill with the first pair of cants being removed, one from each side of the block, and delivered through the conveyor network previously described toward the cant scanner. The band saws are then repositioned for the second cuts and the saw carriage and block are passed back through the band mill with the second set of cants being removed and dropped, one on each side of the block. This process is repeated until the selected cutting program for the block has been completed.
Upon completion, the saw carriage stops in the backstand position between the band mill and the slab chipper and releases the remaining section of the block. The saw carriage then returns to the start position to receive the next block to be processed.
It should be noted that it is possible for the processing to include several passes of the block through the slab chipper in order to remove excess wood such as would occur with a flared block. This serves to prevent damage to the chipper in the event it is necessary to remove more wood than the chipper is capable of on the first pass.
The cants are transferred sequentially from the outfeed conveyor and indexed onto the lugged scan chains. The cants are positioned on the intermediate transfer conveyor with their narrow side up as illustrated in FIG. 6 and are maintained in this relative position during the remaining sawing operations. Each cant is carried onto the scan chains and maintained in contact with a set of lugs by the crowder chain. The position of the cant in contact with the lugs establishes a reference position for the cant during processing which is the equivalent of gripping the cant along a reference axis M as shown in FIG. 6. Each set of lugs retains its cant aligned along the reference axis M during transfer through the cant scanner. Therefore, each individual cant can be identified by its relative position during and after scanning. This facilitates the housekeeping task of the processing unit since a significant interval occurs between the scanning of a particular cant and the processing of that cant by the cant chipper and edger saw arrangement.
The cant scanning operation is similar to the block scanning operation previously described in that a 55 inch by 110 inch scan grid is utilized. In the embodiment described, 55 photocells are utilized, although a different number could be used if desired. The photocell array is actuated as each set of lugs approaches the zero line of the scan grid and as the cant traverses the scan line an output signal is derived from each photocell during each one-tenth inch of cant movement across the scan grid. As previously described, when light is reflected from the smooth upper surface of the cant the photocell produces a positive output. However, when light strikes the wane portions of the cant or is diffused by a front or trailing edge of the cant, the photocell produces no output. Accordingly, an accurate profile of the upper surface of the cant can be detected and measured.
As with the block scanner, data from each cant is processed in unit 30 and the widest parallelogram of wood of uniform thickness encompassed within the profile of the cant is determined. Data representing the center axis of the parallelogram is also calculated and supplied to the cant guides. In response to this data, the two adjustable set stops at the edge of the cant guide conveyor are set to predetermined positions. Accordingly, as the leading edge of the cant moves onto the conveyor into contact with these set stops, the cant is automatically positioned with the center axis of the optimum parallelogram of wood aligned parallel to the center line of the cant chipper and the edger saws. The cant is maintained in this alignment during subsequent sawing.
Referring now to FIG. 7, the profile of a typical cant is shown in solid outline superimposed upon a grid that schematically represents the cant scan grid. The widest parallelogram that can be superimposed within the cant profile is represented by parallelogram K and the center axis of parallelogram K is represented by line L. Line M represents the position of the reference axis of the cant during scanning and line M represents the position of the reference axis after the block is retained on conveyor 142. It should be apparent that the cant is repositioned after scanning so that the center axis L of parallelogram K is parallel to the base of the scan line and parallel to the edger saws. As shown, such repositioning results in the movement of both ends of the cant, causing both angular and lateral adjustment of the reference axis.
The processing unit also controls the movement of one or both heads of the cant chipper to locations which will convert to chips all except the wood within the widest parallelogram as the cant is driven through the chipper. As the edged cants leave the chipper they are carried by conveyor 146 into contact with fence 156. Two inch cants pass the fence member and are ultimately processed through a 4 inch gang edger. The 4 inch cants, however, are transferred by means of transfer conveyor 150 and conveyor 152 for processing through the 2 inch gang edger.
From these saws, the resulting cut lumber is passed onto the conveyor systems previously described and on through an unscrambler into the sorter. Studs from the sorter are usually made up into 7 foot kiln packages in a stacker at the end of the sorter, at which point they can be rolled out for transport to other areas, such as the drying kilns.
It should be apparent that in the sawmill described, the processing units and conveying systems are arranged for convenient handling of cut lumber. However, other arrangements are possible without departing from the scope of the invention.
Likewise, the block scanner is particularly designed for conveniently and accurately handling blocks of 8 foot lengths. However, other scanning systems and scanning grids could be utilized so long as the blocks are repositioned along an optimum cutting axis. As previously mentioned, it is possible to simultaneously scan the block along two planes to derive a threedimensional profile of the block. With such scanning, it is possible to calculate in a single step the maximum cylindrical surface that can be superimposed within the dimensions of a block. The block can then be repositioned with the center axis of the cylinder parallel to an index line for processing the block into cut lumber or into veneer.
In addition, with a single scanning array, a block could be repeatedly passed through the scanner, being rotated a predetermined amount such as 30, between each pass. This would produce data from the scanner output which could also be utilized to derive a three dimensional profile of the block. The center axis of the largest cylindrical surface that could be superimposed within the block could be identified and the block could then be repositioned for processing as previously described. The disadvantage of such scanning is the additional time required. In addition, such scanning requires more intricate housekeeping" operations in the processing unit. Therefore, such scanning is not preferred for the processing of cut lumber.
However, it should be apparent that any of the types of scanning described herein can be used to obtain more wood products from a given log than was heretofore possible. In addition, the invention described results in the automatic processing of blocks at a higher rate than was previously possible with a reduction in personnel.
It is claimed and desired to secure by Letters Patent:
1. A method of processing a log to obtain the optimum amount of wood products of a selected grade therefrom, comprising the steps of positioning the log with respect to a reference location,
scanning the log to determine certain of its dimensions with respect to the reference location,
plotting in a data processing equipment at least one planar profile of the dimensions of the log, said profile being taken in a plane passing through the ends of the log,
computing in a data processing equipment at least the center axis of the widest parallelogram that can be superimposed within the plotted profile of the log, and
repositioning the log with the center axis parallel to an index line' of a log processing equipment.
2. Log processing equipment comprising a saw array aligned with an index line,
aligning means for receiving and holding a log at a reference location,
photoelectric scanning means spaced from said reference location for producing an output signal representative of the dimensions of a log passed by said scanning means,
data processing means connected to said scanning means for evaluating said output signal and producing a data output signal in response thereto,
charger means for releasably gripping said log at said reference location and transporting the log past said scanning means, said charger means including means responsive to said data output signal for angularly repositioning said log with respect to said index line,
a saw carriage, aligned with said index line and movable with respect to said saw array, for receiving from said charger means said log when repositioned, and
control means associated with said saw carriage for selectively moving said carriage with respect to said saw array, said control means being responsive to said data output signal whereby said log carried by said saw carriage is divided into cants by the saw array in accordance with a preselected cutting pattern stored in said data processing means.
3. Log processing equipment as described in claim 2 further including a movable cant chain having means thereon for receiving and holding cants each at a reference position,
transfer conveyor means for receiving cants produced by said saw array and conveying said cants onto said cant chain,
cant scanning means for producing a cant output signal representative of the profile dimensions of a cant passed by said scanning means while being carried on said cant chain, said profile being taken along a flat side of said cant,
said data processing means being connected to said cant scanning means for evaluating said cant output signal and producing a cant data output signal in response thereto,
a cant sawing station spaced from said cant scanning means, including a sawing conveyor and a saw array aligned along a second index line with respect to said sawing conveyor, and
second transfer conveyor means for receiving cants from said cant chain and conveying said cants onto said sawing conveyor, said second transfer conveyor means including adjustable cant guide means responsive to said cant data output signal from said data processing means for repositioning each cant with respect to said second index line before sawing thereof by said saw array.
4. The method of claim 1 further including the steps dividing the log into cants,
positioning each cant with respect to a cant reference position,
scanning each cant to measure certain of its dimensions with respect to the reference position,
plotting in said data processing equipment a planar profile of the measured dimensions of the cant, said profile being taken along a flat side of said cant,
computing in said data processing equipment the center axis of the widest parallelogram that can be superimposed within the plotted profile of the cant, and
repositioning the cant with the center axis parallel to an index line of a cant sawing array.
5. A method of processing a log including the steps placing the log in a reference position,
scanning the log to measure the diameter of the log at numerous locations spaced along the length of the log,
plotting in a data processing equipment a profile of the measured diameters of the log,
computing in said data processing equipment the coordinates with respect to said reference position of the cylindrical surface having the largest diameter defined within said plotted profile, and
repositioning said log with the sides of said cylindrical surface parallel to an index line of a log processing apparatus.
V UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTlON Patent No. 3 7 5 9 53 Dated JWE 5. 1973 Inventor(s) Howard C. Mason and Fred Sohn It is certified that error appears in the above-identified patent and that said Letters Patent are hereby corrected as shown below:
The invention is a joint invention of Howard C. Mason and Fred Sohn, rather than a sole invention of Howard C. Mason alone.
Column 4, line 26, change "in"'to --is-.
Signed and sealed this 21st dayof May 1974.
EDWARD M.FLETCHER,JR. c. MARSHALL DANN Attesting Officer I Commissioner of Patents FORM PO-IOSO (10-69) USCOMM-DC 60376-P69 U.5 GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: I969 0366-$34
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3037538 *||Jan 7, 1957||Jun 5, 1962||Graham Ernest J||Device for alining end portions of a log to a chucking device therefor|
|US3459246 *||Sep 23, 1966||Aug 5, 1969||Kahrs Maskiner Ab||Method and plant for treating lumber|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3875841 *||Sep 26, 1973||Apr 8, 1975||Nova Lumber Co Ltd||Sawmill apparatus|
|US3890509 *||Feb 7, 1974||Jun 17, 1975||Black Clawson Co||Automatic edger set works method and apparatus|
|US3941019 *||May 9, 1973||Mar 2, 1976||Oliver Machinery Company||Method and apparatus for cutting lumber and the like|
|US3960041 *||Jan 21, 1974||Jun 1, 1976||Warren Lyle D||Automatic sawmill|
|US3963938 *||Apr 16, 1975||Jun 15, 1976||Saab-Scania Aktiebolag||Apparatus for scanning cants to determine optimum edging cuts|
|US3970128 *||Apr 16, 1975||Jul 20, 1976||Saab-Scania Aktiebolag||Orientation of cant for translatory feed through edging cutters|
|US4074601 *||Dec 29, 1975||Feb 21, 1978||Warren Lyle D||Automatic sawmill|
|US4164248 *||Dec 30, 1977||Aug 14, 1979||Alpo Rysti||Method and apparatus for cutting off defective portions of lengths of timber|
|US4197888 *||Feb 21, 1978||Apr 15, 1980||The Coe Manufacturing Company||Log centering apparatus and method using transmitted light and reference edge log scanner|
|US4204798 *||Oct 31, 1977||May 27, 1980||Brewster Robert W||Automatic sawmill|
|US4239072 *||Aug 29, 1978||Dec 16, 1980||A Ahlstrom Osakeyhtio||Method and apparatus for edge-trimming a board|
|US4356850 *||Sep 29, 1980||Nov 2, 1982||Black Clawson, Inc.||Veneer lathe scanning system|
|US4378827 *||May 28, 1981||Apr 5, 1983||Sun Studs, Inc.||Veneer lathe lug charger system having enhanced accuracy and rate of production|
|US4378829 *||May 28, 1981||Apr 5, 1983||Sun Studs, Inc.||Veneer lathe log charger system having enhanced accuracy and rate of production|
|US4378830 *||May 28, 1981||Apr 5, 1983||Sun Studs, Inc.||Veneer lathe log charger system having enhanced accuracy and rate of production|
|US4379476 *||May 28, 1981||Apr 12, 1983||Sun Studs, Inc.||Veneer lathe log charger system having enhanced accuracy and rate of production|
|US4379477 *||May 28, 1981||Apr 12, 1983||Sun Studs, Inc.||Veneer lathe log charger system having enhanced accuracy and rate of production|
|US4384601 *||May 28, 1981||May 24, 1983||Sun Studs, Inc.||Veneer lathe log charger system having enhanced accuracy and rate of production|
|US4398580 *||May 28, 1981||Aug 16, 1983||Sun Studs, Inc.||Veneer lathe log charger system having enhanced accuracy and rate of production|
|US4412297 *||Oct 6, 1980||Oct 25, 1983||Black Clawson, Inc.||Ultrasonic log scanning and orientation system|
|US4441537 *||Nov 12, 1981||Apr 10, 1984||Plan-Sell Oy||Apparatus and method for aligning lumber|
|US4462443 *||Jun 14, 1982||Jul 31, 1984||Kockums Industries, Inc.||Positioning and feeding apparatus for lumber edger including improved clamp means|
|US4468993 *||Jun 11, 1982||Sep 4, 1984||International Paper Company||Small log bucking system|
|US4691751 *||Dec 20, 1985||Sep 8, 1987||Aihiko Ky||Method for sawing a tree trunk and for treating a uniformly thick slice of wood sawed off the trunk|
|US4710808 *||Aug 5, 1986||Dec 1, 1987||Mechanical Technology Incorporated||Machine vision differential measurement system|
|US4807677 *||Dec 29, 1986||Feb 28, 1989||Sbr Maschinen-Handelsgesellschaft Mbh & Co. Kg||Device for machining plate-shaped workpieces, as well as battens or timber strips|
|US4907294 *||Apr 28, 1988||Mar 6, 1990||U.S. Natural Resources, Inc.||Log scanning system|
|US4949769 *||Sep 15, 1989||Aug 21, 1990||Cameron Robert E||Log delivery mechanism|
|US5088363 *||Jun 20, 1990||Feb 18, 1992||Aaron U. Jones||Method and apparatus for an automatic sawmill|
|US5262956 *||Jun 26, 1991||Nov 16, 1993||Inovec, Inc.||Statistically compensated optimization system|
|US5368080 *||Jul 9, 1993||Nov 29, 1994||Industries P.H.L. Inc.||Apparatus and method for a board infeed system|
|US5444635 *||Sep 8, 1993||Aug 22, 1995||Alpine Engineered Products, Inc.||Optimizing technique for sawing lumber|
|US5761979 *||Mar 7, 1996||Jun 9, 1998||Mcgehee; Ronald W.||Edge trimming and board ripping apparatus and method|
|US5785102 *||Feb 20, 1997||Jul 28, 1998||Industries P.H.L. Inc.||Board edging infeed apparatus|
|US5870936 *||Oct 1, 1997||Feb 16, 1999||Mcgehee Equipment Company||Edge trimming and board ripping apparatus and method|
|US6524162||Jun 11, 1997||Feb 25, 2003||Hct Shaping Systems Sa||Slicing center|
|US6929043||Jul 19, 2002||Aug 16, 2005||Valley Machine Works Ltd.||Optimized board edger and method of operation thereof|
|US7017632 *||Jan 15, 2003||Mar 28, 2006||Coe Newnes/Mcgehee, Inc.||Position-based integrated motion controlled curve sawing|
|US7168353||May 26, 2005||Jan 30, 2007||Frecision Automation, Inc.||Material handling systems|
|US7171738||Oct 12, 2004||Feb 6, 2007||Precision Automation, Inc.||Systems for processing workpieces|
|US7245981||May 26, 2005||Jul 17, 2007||Precision Automation, Inc.||Material handling system with saw and wheel drag mechanism|
|US7483765||Feb 26, 2007||Jan 27, 2009||Precision Automation, Inc.||Gauge system|
|US7543615||Dec 16, 2004||Jun 9, 2009||U.S. Natural Resources, Inc.||Optimized board edger and method of operation thereof|
|US7571751||Dec 16, 2004||Aug 11, 2009||U.S. Natural Resources, Inc.||Optimized board edger and method of operation thereof|
|US7792602||Sep 7, 2010||Precision Automation, Inc.||Material processing system and a material processing method including a saw station and an interface with touch screen|
|US7835808||Nov 16, 2010||Precision Automation, Inc.||Method and apparatus for processing material|
|US7938156 *||Apr 20, 2006||May 10, 2011||Weyerhaeuser Nr Company||Method for optimizing lumber|
|US7966714||Jun 28, 2011||Precision Automation, Inc.||Multi-step systems for processing workpieces|
|US7975830 *||May 28, 2007||Jul 12, 2011||Microtec S.R.L.||Method and device for measuring the properties of moving objects|
|US8117732||Oct 22, 2008||Feb 21, 2012||Precision Automation, Inc.||Multi-step systems for processing workpieces|
|US8783140||Jun 9, 2010||Jul 22, 2014||Lean Tool Systems, Llc||Gauge system for workpiece processing|
|US20030019545 *||Jul 19, 2002||Jan 30, 2003||Woodford James D.||Optimized board edger and method of operation thereof|
|US20030102053 *||Jan 15, 2003||Jun 5, 2003||Kennedy Joe B.||Position-based integrated motion controlled curve sawing|
|US20050109423 *||Dec 16, 2004||May 26, 2005||Valley Machine Works Ltd.||Optimized board edger and method of operation thereof|
|US20060000326 *||May 26, 2005||Jan 5, 2006||Dick Spencer B||Material handling systems|
|US20060004478 *||May 26, 2005||Jan 5, 2006||Dick Spencer B||Material handling systems|
|US20070028730 *||Jul 24, 2006||Feb 8, 2007||Sawyer Philip P||Apparatus and methods for double ended processing|
|US20070240547 *||Feb 5, 2007||Oct 18, 2007||Dick Spencer B||Multi-step systems for processing workpieces|
|US20070246125 *||Apr 20, 2006||Oct 25, 2007||Philip Latos||Method for optimizing lumber|
|US20080009961 *||Feb 26, 2007||Jan 10, 2008||Dick Spencer B||Gauge system|
|US20080289722 *||May 22, 2008||Nov 27, 2008||Mcgehee Development Company Llc||Forest Products Lineal Cutter Assembly and Method|
|US20090100974 *||Dec 21, 2007||Apr 23, 2009||Sawyer Philip P||Method and apparatus for processing material|
|US20090105870 *||Oct 22, 2008||Apr 23, 2009||Precision Automation, Inc.||Multi-step systems for processing workpieces|
|US20090105871 *||Oct 28, 2008||Apr 23, 2009||Precision Automation, Inc.||Multi-step systems for processing workpieces|
|US20090105872 *||Oct 28, 2008||Apr 23, 2009||Precision Automation, Inc.||Multi-step system for processing workpieces|
|US20090273795 *||May 28, 2007||Nov 5, 2009||Microtec S.R.L||Method and device for measuring the properties of moving objects|
|US20090299519 *||Jan 26, 2009||Dec 3, 2009||Precision Automation, Inc.||Gauge system|
|DE3717124C1 *||May 21, 1987||Jul 28, 1988||Horst Dipl-Ing Luening||Verfahren zum Steuern ferneinstellbarer Saegen|
|EP0813943A2 *||Jun 18, 1997||Dec 29, 1997||Charles Hauser||Cutting center|
|WO2009072968A1 *||Dec 2, 2008||Jun 11, 2009||A-Sort Ab||Method and arrangement for log classification|
|U.S. Classification||144/357, 144/3.1, 144/400|
|International Classification||B23D59/00, B27B1/00, B27B31/06, B27B31/00, B27B29/00|
|Cooperative Classification||B27B31/06, B27B29/00, B23D59/008, B27B1/007|
|European Classification||B27B29/00, B27B1/00D, B23D59/00Z, B27B31/06|