Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3740600 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateJun 19, 1973
Filing dateDec 12, 1971
Priority dateDec 12, 1971
Publication numberUS 3740600 A, US 3740600A, US-A-3740600, US3740600 A, US3740600A
InventorsB Turley
Original AssigneeGen Electric
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Self-supporting coil brace
US 3740600 A
A wedge-shaped device to be frictionally inserted between adjacent pressed-to-form, edge-wise-wound, coils of a salient pole machine to prevent separation of the coils from the poles by the tangential component of centrifugal force acting on the coils. A flange portion integrally secured to the inner end of the wedge extends in opposite directions to be interposed in close relationship between the rotor core and each of the adjacent coils to hold the wedge in place.
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

United States Patent i1 1 i111 3,740,60fi

Turley 1 June 19, 1973 [54] SELF-SUPPORTING COIL BRACE 729,414 5/1903 Reist 3l0/l94 X [75] Inventor: Barry J. Turley, Wattsburg, Pa.

Primary Examiner-D. F. Duggan [73] Asslgneei General Electl'lc CmnPanYv Erie Attorney-Walter C. Bernkopf, Frank L. Neuhauser [22] Filed: Dec. 12,1971 and Oscar B. Waddell et al.

21 A I. No.: 206 826 1 pp 57 ABSTRACT [52] U S Cl 310/194 310/214 310/269 A wedge-shaped device to be frictionally inserted be [51] 02k 3/52 tween adjacent pressed-to-form, edge-wise-wound, [58] Field 216 218 coils of a salient pole machine to prevent separation of 310/194 180 60 A 269 the coils from the poles by the tangential component of centrifugal force acting on the coils. A flange portion [56] References Cited integrally secured to the inner end of the wedge extends in opposite directions to be interposed in close UNITED STATES PATENTS relationship between the rotor core and each of the adichlrnd jacem Coils to hold the wedge in place 1e 5 Claims, 4 Drawing Figures Pat gnted June 19, 1973 3,740,600


I I! n SELF-SUPPORTING COIL BRACE BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates generally to dynamoelectric machines and in particular to rotor construction of salient pole machines.

In dynamoelectric machines intended for relatively high speed operation, the stresses induced in the structure due to centrifugal forces introduce special problems in regard to sufficiency of mechanical strength of rotor components, in particular the field coils on a salient pole rotor for a synchronous machine. These coils tend to be relatively heavy and not very strong or rigid as a unit. Hence, if such a coil is not firmly supported on the pole body and very well braced, it tends to move as a unit, its turns tend to move relative to one another or the coils tend to becomedistorted, all of which can damage the coil itself or the coil along with other parts of the machine.

Various schemes have been employed to prevent the coil movement relative to the rotor poles. It is well known to extend the pole tips beyond the coil surface and provide a securing means between these tips and the rotor. It is also well known to provide a wedge-like device between pairs of coils to bias them radially inwardly and tangentially toward their respective poles. However, means must be provided to retain the wedge itself in position to prevent its movement in an outward radial direction.

A common design in rotors of dynamoelectric machines entails the pressin'g-to-form of coils so as to allow the centrifugal force on the coil to be restrained by the respective pole tip. However, under high stress the coil is susceptible to distortion and the inner turns may slide tangentially to negate the press-to-form effect. A brace is again required with the attendant need for a means of securing the brace.

lt'is therefore an object of this invention to provide an improved field pole structure for a rotor of a salient pole machine.

Another object of this invention is the provision for tangential stabilization of pressed-to-form rotor coils.

Yet another object of this invention is the provision for preventing the distortion of pressed-to-form rotor coils under high stress conditions.

Still another object of this invention is the provision for a coil brace which is self-supporting.

A further object of this invention is the provision for a coil brace'which is economical to manufacture and install, and extremely functional in use.

These objects and other features and advantages become more readily apparent upon reference to the following description when taken in conjunction with the appended drawings.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION A self-supporting device is installed between adjacent pairs of pressed-to-form coils so as to mutually restrain the opposing inner corners thereof from lateral movement caused by the high stresses resulting from centrifugal forces. Adjacent pairs of spaced coils from at their opposing sides an acute angle 45 into which the wedge-shaped device conforms. The device extends radially inwardly beyond the inner surface of the coils where it flanges in opposite directions into two legs which are interposed in close relationship between the rotor core and the respective coil inner surfaces to hold the device in place. The device prevents distortion of the coils at the inner portion thereof and allows the pole tips to counteract the principal centrifugal forces acting on the coils. No special securing devices are required and the braces are applied to conventional coil arrangements without modifications being made thereto.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a salient pole rotor with the brace installed in accordance with the pre ferred embodiment.

FIG. 2 is a partial transverse-sectional view thereof with certain directional forces indicated. I

FIG. 3 is a partial sectional view of a pressed-to-form coil with distorting forces acting thereon.

FIG. 4 is a perspective view of the coil brace of the preferred embodiment of this invention.

In the drawings as hereinafter described, a preferred embodiment is depicted; however, various other modifications and alternate construction can be made thereto without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT Reference is now made to FIG. 1 which illustrates a dynamoelectric rotor 10 having a salient pole type of field structure for a synchronous machine. The magnetic core 11 is made up of a number of laminations stacked in axial alignment on a shaft 12.

Secured to and projecting radially outward from the core 11 toward the stator inner surface 15, is a plurality of arcuately arranged, equally spaced poles 13. The number of poles is significant only insofar as it relates to the feasibility of a pressed-to-form coil arrangement. Since this invention relates to such an arrangement, the number of poles is restricted to a minimum of eight, wherein the angular spacing therebetween is s 45. The geometry of a salient pole rotor is such that the utilization of the pressed-to-form coil concept is most effective when this minimum number of poles is employed.

The plurality of poles 13 are substantially identical with each comprising a pole body 14 and an integrally formed head 16 having oppositely protruding tips 17 and 18. Each pole extends the axial length of the core and has a coil 19 disposed thereon so as to surround the pole body 14 and occupy the space between the rotor core 11 and the pole tips 17 and 18.

The coils 19 comprise a plurality of flat turns 21 assembled together in a manner commonly known in the art as edge-wise-wound windings. Insulation material 20, such as asbestos, is interspersed between adjacent turns to prevent the flow of current therebetween.

Between adjacent coils a V-shaped, interpolar gap 22 exists, convergent toward the center and terminating at the core periphery where the inner corners of adjacent coils are separated by a narrow space 23 (FIG. 2). Disposed in each of these spaces is a coil brace 24 which is peculiar to this invention.

Referring now to FIG. 2 a portion of the rotor 11 is shown in cross-section with a pair of adjacent poles l3 and their coils 19 being illustrated. The pole bodies 14 are secured to the core 11 by T-shaped tongues 26 which are inserted into similar shaped slots in the rotor core and secured therein by wedges 27 which draw the bodies 14 rigidly against the periphery of the rotor. Other securing arrangements such as bolts may be utilized, the important feature being that of having poles distinct from the rotor core and adapted to be radially drawn in to secure the associated coil in close relationship between the rotor core and the pole tips 17 and 18.

As stated hereinbefore a pressed-to-form coil arrangement is used only on rotors having eight or more poles. The significant feature of such an arrangement is that the pole tips and coil windings are canted so as to be disposed substantially at, but slightly beyond, the angle of being in tangential relationship with the rotor core, thereby resulting in a relatively stable disposition with respect to movement caused by centrifugal forces. In FIG. 2 the resultant centrifugal forces acting on the respective sides of the coil when the turns are considered as an integral unit are represented by the vectors a, and b while those forces acting on the single innermost turn 28 are represented by the vectors c and d. It can be seen that as the turns are considered individually, the resultant forces acting thereon tend to move outwardly toward the tip edges 29 and 31 as we approach the innermost turn 28.

FIG. 3 shows a representative portion of a pressed-toform coil 19 wherein the centrifugal forces 32 acting outwardly are counteracted by the restrictive forces 33 of the pole tip. The resulting compression tends to increase as the outer edge 34 is approached, and the coil tends to deform to a configuration indicated by the dotted lines. As the temperature of the coil rises due to heat generation this deformation phenomena becomes even more a reality.

Referring back to FIG. 2 one side of the coil 19 (in dotted line) is shown as it would appear in a deformed condition. When the. composite center of gravity is transferred outwardly to a new position 30, the vector e representing the resultant centrifugal force acting thereon is found to pass outside the tip edge 29. When this condition exists the coil, and in particular its innermost turns, will tend to separate from the pole body 14 and may eventually result in a failure.

The coil brace24 is therefore installed to prevent this lateral movement caused by deformation, so as to allow the pole tips to restrain the coil turns through the successive application of restrictive forces imposed by the individual adjacent turns. One of the braces 24 (FIGS. 1, 2, and 4) is installed between each pair of adjacent windings so as to mutually exert opposite forces thereon. It is supported by the coils themselves and requires no special attachments to retain it in place. The brace 24 (FIG. 4) comprises a wedge-like body 36 having an upper wall 37 and sidewalls 38 and 39, converging away from the upper wall and integrally attached to a flange portion 41, having legs 42 and 43 extending in opposite directions on either side of the body 36. Its length is substantially that of the axial length of the rotor core. The brace or any portion thereof may be hollow or may be of an, integral solid construction as that'shown in FIG. 4. Its composition may vary so long as it. is non-conductive and possesses the required strength to withstand the forces and heat to which it is exposed. An insulated metal construction has been found satisfactory. However, a solid fiberglass construction is preferred because of economy and ease of manufacturing.

Installation of the braces is simply accomplished by axially inserting them between adjacent coils after the coils have been installed on the pole bodies 14, but before the poles have been rigidly drawn in to the rotor core surface. The wedge-like body portion 36 is frictionally placed in a tight fit relationship between the adjacent coils with the legs 42 and 43 being placed under the respective coils in direct contact with the rotor core surface. As the poles are drawn inwardly in a manner such as that described hereinbefore, the legs become tightly sandwiched between their respective coils and the core surface, thereby securing the brace from any movement and obviating the need for special securing devices. Further, the coils are of the conventional press-to-form construction and require no modification to adapt them to use with the coil brace.

It should be noted that even though the brace structure as shown comprises a single elongate element it may be segmented into a plurality of axially spaced portions to accomplish substantially the same results.

What I claim as new and desire to secure by Letters Patent of the United States are:

1. An improved rotor for a salient pole machine of the type having a rotor core, a plurality of angularly spaced pole bodies projecting radially from the core, each of the pole bodies having a head on the outer end thereof with tips projecting in both directions from the pole body in concentric relation to the core, means for securing the pole bodies to the rotor core, and a coil embracing each pole body so that adjacent coils are angularly spaced in respect to one another and define interpolar spaces, each space having an included acute angle toward the rotor core, wherein the improvement comprises:

at least one brace disposed between the, coils in each of the interpolar spaces, said brace being tapered in cross-section so as to conform to and occupy only the radially inward portion of its interpolar spaces, with the preponderant remaining portion of the spaces being open to allow free ventilation to the coils, said brace having integrally secured on its radially inner end a flange portion having legs extending outwardly inopposite directions to be interposed in close frictional relationship between the rotor core and their respective coils, said legs comprising the sole means of securing said brace in the interpolar space and said brace acting to mutually exert opposing forces on the adjacent coils to prevent their movement away from the pole bodies when rotated.

2. An improved rotor as set forth in claim 1 wherein the coils are of the edge-wise wound type.

3. An improved rotor as set forth in claim 1 wherein said brace is an elongate member extending the axial length of the rotor core.

4. An improved rotor as set forth in claim 1 wherein the number of poles on the rotor is at least eight and the acute angle between poles is s 45".

5. An improved rotor as set forth in claim 1 wherein said brace is constructed of a non-conducting material.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US434206 *Dec 1, 1889Aug 12, 1890 Armature for dynamos
US729414 *Apr 11, 1902May 26, 1903Gen ElectricField-magnet structure.
US912551 *Jan 22, 1906Feb 16, 1909Bullock Electric Mfg CoField structure for dynamo-electric machines.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4028574 *Mar 20, 1975Jun 7, 1977Bbc Brown Boveri & Company LimitedSynchronous motor structure incorporating rotor having solid poles
US4054770 *Mar 10, 1976Oct 18, 1977The Electricity CouncilInduction heating of strip and other elongate metal workpieces
US4260921 *Dec 26, 1978Apr 7, 1981The Garrett CorporationPermanent magnet rotor assembly having rectangularly shaped tongues
US4332079 *Apr 7, 1980Jun 1, 1982The Garrett CorporationMethod of making rotor rectangularly shaped tongues
US5952755 *Mar 18, 1997Sep 14, 1999Electric Boat CorporationPermanent magnet motor rotor
US6232691 *Sep 17, 1998May 15, 2001Dellcom Aviation Inc.DC electric starter-generator
US6261437Nov 4, 1997Jul 17, 2001Asea Brown Boveri AbAnode, process for anodizing, anodized wire and electric device comprising such anodized wire
US6279850Nov 4, 1997Aug 28, 2001Abb AbCable forerunner
US6357688Feb 2, 1998Mar 19, 2002Abb AbCoiling device
US6369470Nov 4, 1997Apr 9, 2002Abb AbAxial cooling of a rotor
US6376775May 27, 1997Apr 23, 2002Abb AbConductor for high-voltage windings and a rotating electric machine comprising a winding including the conductor
US6396187Nov 4, 1997May 28, 2002Asea Brown Boveri AbLaminated magnetic core for electric machines
US6417456May 27, 1997Jul 9, 2002Abb AbInsulated conductor for high-voltage windings and a method of manufacturing the same
US6429563Feb 2, 1998Aug 6, 2002Abb AbMounting device for rotating electric machines
US6439497Feb 2, 1998Aug 27, 2002Abb AbMethod and device for mounting a winding
US6465979Feb 2, 1998Oct 15, 2002Abb AbSeries compensation of electric alternating current machines
US6525265Nov 30, 1998Feb 25, 2003Asea Brown Boveri AbHigh voltage power cable termination
US6525504Feb 23, 2000Feb 25, 2003Abb AbMethod and device for controlling the magnetic flux in a rotating high voltage electric alternating current machine
US6577487May 27, 1997Jun 10, 2003Asea Brown Boveri AbReduction of harmonics in AC machines
US6646363Feb 2, 1998Nov 11, 2003Abb AbRotating electric machine with coil supports
US6801421Sep 29, 1998Oct 5, 2004Abb AbSwitchable flux control for high power static electromagnetic devices
US6806615 *Mar 28, 2002Oct 19, 2004Hitachi, Ltd.Core, rotating machine using the core and production method thereof
US6822363May 27, 1997Nov 23, 2004Abb AbElectromagnetic device
US6825585Feb 2, 1998Nov 30, 2004Abb AbEnd plate
US6828701Feb 2, 1998Dec 7, 2004Asea Brown Boveri AbSynchronous machine with power and voltage control
US6831388May 27, 1997Dec 14, 2004Abb AbSynchronous compensator plant
US6867674Nov 30, 1998Mar 15, 2005Asea Brown Boveri AbTransformer
US6873080Sep 29, 1998Mar 29, 2005Abb AbSynchronous compensator plant
US6885273Feb 14, 2002Apr 26, 2005Abb AbInduction devices with distributed air gaps
US6891303May 27, 1997May 10, 2005Abb AbHigh voltage AC machine winding with grounded neutral circuit
US6894416May 27, 1997May 17, 2005Abb AbHydro-generator plant
US6906447May 27, 1997Jun 14, 2005Abb AbRotating asynchronous converter and a generator device
US6919664May 27, 1997Jul 19, 2005Abb AbHigh voltage plants with electric motors
US6936947May 27, 1997Aug 30, 2005Abb AbTurbo generator plant with a high voltage electric generator
US6940380May 27, 1997Sep 6, 2005Abb AbTransformer/reactor
US6970063Feb 2, 1998Nov 29, 2005Abb AbPower transformer/inductor
US6972505May 27, 1997Dec 6, 2005AbbRotating electrical machine having high-voltage stator winding and elongated support devices supporting the winding and method for manufacturing the same
US6995646Feb 2, 1998Feb 7, 2006Abb AbTransformer with voltage regulating means
US7019429Nov 27, 1998Mar 28, 2006Asea Brown Boveri AbMethod of applying a tube member in a stator slot in a rotating electrical machine
US7045704Apr 19, 2001May 16, 2006Abb AbStationary induction machine and a cable therefor
US7046492Dec 20, 2004May 16, 2006Abb AbPower transformer/inductor
US7061133Nov 30, 1998Jun 13, 2006Abb AbWind power plant
US7141908Mar 1, 2001Nov 28, 2006Abb AbRotating electrical machine
US7579738Oct 31, 2005Aug 25, 2009Greenee Energy Inc.Multi-phase electrical motor for use in a wheel
US20030030345 *Mar 28, 2002Feb 13, 2003Hitachi, LtdCore, rotating machine using the core and production method thereof
US20040056557 *Jul 17, 2003Mar 25, 2004Yuji EnomotoEpicycloidal motor
US20070096586 *Oct 31, 2005May 3, 2007Jerome CrosMulti-phase electrical motor for use in a wheel
DE29718421U1 *Oct 16, 1997Dec 11, 1997Siemens AgElektromotor
EP0866540A2 *Mar 17, 1998Sep 23, 1998Electric Boat CorporationA rotor for a motor or generator
EP0866540A3 *Mar 17, 1998May 31, 2000Electric Boat CorporationA rotor for a motor or generator
WO1998034328A1 *Feb 2, 1998Aug 6, 1998Asea Brown Boveri AbRotating electric machine with coil supports
U.S. Classification310/194, 310/269, 310/214, 174/DIG.210
International ClassificationH02K3/52
Cooperative ClassificationH02K3/527, Y10S174/21
European ClassificationH02K3/52B