Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3755008 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateAug 28, 1973
Filing dateMar 24, 1971
Priority dateMar 24, 1971
Also published asDE2214445A1
Publication numberUS 3755008 A, US 3755008A, US-A-3755008, US3755008 A, US3755008A
InventorsEhrreich J, Reti A
Original AssigneeGraham Magnetics Inc
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Process for enhancing magnetic properties of metal powder by heat treating with salt
US 3755008 A
Abstract
A process for enhancing the magnetic properties of small particulate ferromagnetic powders, e.g. particles below the critical diameter for which an untreated particle's domainboundary energy equals its magnetostatic energy, the process comprising heat treating said particles. In the more favorable embodiments of the invention, the particles are heated in intimate association with a particulate refractory material which serves as a shield for effectively preventing excessive sintering of the metal particles.
Images(4)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

United States Patent n 1 Ehrreich et a1.

1 1 PROCESS FOR ENHANCING MAGNETIC PROPERTIES OF METAL POWDER BY HEAT TREATING WITH SALT [75] lnventors: John E. Ehrreich, Wayland; Adrian R. Reti, Cambridge, both of Mass.

[73] Assignee: Graham Magnetics, Inc., Graham,

Tex.

[22] Filed: Mar. 24, 1971 [21] Appl. No.: 127,851

[52] US. Cl. 148/105, 75/O.5 AA, 75/0.5 BA,

148/102, 148/103, 148/112 [51] Int. Cl. H01f 1/02 [58] Field of Search 75/0.5 AA, 0.5 BA;

[5 6] References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,503,947 4/1950 Haskew 264/111 2,885,366 5/1959 ller. 106/308 3,663,318 5/1972 Little et a1. 148/105 3,669,643 6/1972 Bagley er a1. 148/105 3,672,867 6/1972 Little 148/105 3,567,525 3/1971 Graham et a1... 148/31.57 3,255,052 6/1966 Opitz 148/105 [4 1 Aug. 28, 1973 1,838,831 12/1931 Hochheim et al. 148/105 2,974,104 3/1961 Paine et a1 148/105 X 3,188,247 6/1965 de Vos et al 148/101 3,206,338 9/1965 Miller et al. 148/105 3,535,104 10/1970 Little, Jr. et a1. 75/0.5

OTHER PUBLICATIONS Thrush, P. W. et a1., (Edit.) Dictionary of Mining, Minerology & Related Terms (US. Dept. Interior), 1968, pp. 908 & 956.

Primary Examiner-L. Dewayne Rutledge Assistant Examiner-W. R. Satterfield Atromey--Cesari & McKenna [57] ABSTRACT 7 Claims, NoDrawings PROCESS FOR ENHANCING MAGNETIC PROPERTIES OF METAL POWDER BY HEAT TREATING WITI-I SALT BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to a process for making magnetic particles formed of exceptionally small metal particles, and to the particles formed thereby.

In recent years there has been a great deal of activity in making small metallic particles for use in various fields of technology. For example, metal powders are utilized in catalytic-type processes wherein they may be carried on an inert carrier or may be used directly. Metal powders also find some utility in pyrotechnic formulations and in manufacture of special-purpose mixtures such as, for example, might be used in manufacture of magnets. Metal powders also find use in manufacture of magnetic tapes such as those used in information retrieval systems.

Very small metallic particles are particularly useful in a number of these applications because of their high surface area or some other such inherent property. It is often convenient that such very small metallic parti cles be magnetic. Magnetic characteristics not only make them useful for many special applications, but also make them more easily recoverable and easier to manipulate. However, it has remained a problem to produce metallic particles of high magnetic character when the particles are very small, e.g. below the socalled critical diameter of a given metal.

As disclosed by Thomas O. Paine at pages 149150 of Magnetic Properties of Metals and Alloys published by American Society for Metals, Cleveland, 0. (1959), the critical diameter is that for which a particles domain-boundary energy equals its magnetostatic energy.

Clearly, then, the more ideally-arranged magnetic particles will have a higher magnetostatic energy than less ideally-arranged magnetic particles of the same size. This effect has been used by investigators such as Miller and Oppegard who, in work described in U. S. Pat. No. 3,206,338, caused very small particles to be produced in a magnetic field, thereby enhancing the arrangement of the atoms within each particle to provide a relatively ideal magnet; and, consequently obtaining greater magnetostatic energy for each particle than would have been achieved without use of a magnet. The resulting particles exhibit magnetic behavior at unusually small particle sizes, i.e. particle sizes in the order of 0.01 micron (100 Angstroms) in crosssectional direction and 0.05 microns (500 Angstroms) in length.

This utilization of a magnetic field, although practically employed on a laboratory basis, does present practical problems when it is scaled up for production of commercial quantities of metal powders. Moreover, the products produced thereby are still not at their optimum order. An alternative, less cumbersome, method of achieving very small, yet magnetic, particles isdesirable.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Therefore, it is an object of the invention to provide a novel process for making very small magnetic partimizing any sintering of said particles.

Other objects of the invention will be obvious to those skilled in the art on reading this application.

The above objects have been accomplished by heat treating small ferromagnetic metallic powders at temperatures high enough to permit a crystalline or atomic rearrangement within the metal particle.

The most advantageous means for producing said powders is believed to be by reduction of a soluble metallic salt to the metal by a strong reducing agent, eg a "metal borohydride like sodium borohydride. However, formation of metal particles by decomposition of metal carbonyls or by other precipitation reactions, may also be used to provide particles for use in the invention.

The term ferromagnetic as used herein is meant to cover not only alpha iron, cobalt, nickel, gadolinium and dysprosium, but is also meant to cover materials such as the Heusler-type alloys which are ferromagnetic, albeit the individual elemental components thereof are not. These latter compositions include manganese alloys with copper and aluminum or indium, with arsenic and with antimony. The manganese atom therein is generally considered to contribute the ferromagnetic activity in the alloy environment.

Heat treatment temperatures in the range of from 250C to 650C have proven effective with cobalt, iron, and mixtures thereof. Those skilled in the metallurgical arts will understand that the heat cycle will have various equivalents when higher temperatures are used for shorter times or when lower temperatures are used for longer times.

In a particularly advantageous embodiment of the invention, the thermal treatment is carried out while maintaining the metal particles in intimate contact with a refractory substance, say a high-melting salt like sodium chloride. The presence of such a refractory material has been found to sub-stantially inhibit excessive sintering of the metal particles during heat treatment. The presence of the refractory material is particularly important at higher temperatures at which the particles tend to undergo a favorable realignment more readily. At such temperatures, the tendency for particulate sintering is particularly high.

The refractory substance should usually have some physical or chemical property which makes it readily separable from the magnetic particles. Mere differential magnetism is not usually a convenient means although it can be utilized for magnetic separation. Differential specific gravity can be exploited in a centrifugal separation process. It is usually more advantageous to use a chemical parameter such as water solubility to effect the separation of the refractory material from the metal. Thus water-soluble salts such as sodium chloride, etc, are most advantageously used.

ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION In order to point out more fully the nature of the present invention, the specific embodiments of the present process and products produced thereby are set forth below:

Working Example 1 A quantity of 71.4 grams of CoCl .6I-I,O was dissolved in 300 milliliters water. In a second vessel, 11.4 grams of sodium borohydride were dissolved in 300 milliliters of water.

The borohydride solution was charged into the cobalt salt solution and agitated with a magnetic stirrer. This resulted in the reduction of the cobalt to a particulate 85 oersteds 0.35

Saturation Magnetic Moment Coercivity Squareness The magnetic measurements set forth above and elsewhere in this specification were made on a vibrating string magnetometer. The samples were air-stable because they had been exposed to air before measurement and therefor had an oxide protective layer thereon. Generally, two hysteresis loops were traced for each sample; one at about 1 kilooersted peak-field and one at about 8 kilo-oersteds. This methodis quantitative and requires only a small sample, e.g. several milligrams of the magnetic powder being measured.

Squareness is defined as the remanent magnetization divided by the saturation magnetic moment. Thus, remanence can be calculated by simply multiplying squareness by saturation magnetization. A sample of 500 milligrams of the resulting particles were heat treated at 300C under a hydrogen atmosphere for 30 minutes, cooled to room temperature while still under the hydrogen atmosphere, and purged with argon gas. Thereupon the magnetic properties were measured to be as follows:v

48 e m u/gram 356 oersteds 'Working Example 2 A quantity of five grams of the cobalt powder, taken from the product of Working Example 1 before the heat treatment thereof, was mixed with 80 grams of very fine sodium chloride powder. This salt powder had all passed through a 425 mesh screen.

The particulate mixture was comminuted in a quartcapacity ball-mill jar with ceramic balls for 48 hours. Thereupon, eight grams of the powdery mixture was subjected to the same heat treatment as the material discussed in Example 1, i.e. 300C for 30 minutes.

After the heat treatment the powder mix was washed four times with 100 milliliters of water and three times with 100 milliliters of tetrahydrofuran. The material was air dried, vacuum dried and its electromagnetic properties were measured to be as follows:

Saturation Magnetic Moment 67 e m u/gram Coercivity 560 oersteds Squareness 0.38

The presence of the particulate sodium chloride during the heat-treating step resulted in about a 38 per cent increase in the saturation magnetic movement value and nearly a sixty per cent increase in the coercive force value over those values obtained when the salt was not present during the heat treatment, i.e. in the heat treatment of Example 1.

Working Example 3 Effect of increasing Temperature In addition to the heat treatment at 300C, described in each of Examples 1 and 2, the materials from each Example were heat-treated for thirty minutes at a series of higher temperatures with the following results:

Saturation Magnetic Moment Temperature Example 1 Example 2 No Salt Salt Present From the above results, it seems clear that further increases in temperature will not enable obtaining higher saturation magnetic moment values during a cobalt powder treatment period as long as 30 minutes.

Coercive Force The optimum coercivity appears to bereached, during a 30-minute treatment of cobalt at a temperature below 450C.

Squareness Temperature Example 1 Example 2 No Salt Salt Present 300C 0.41 0.38 350C 0.42 0.35 400C 0.38 0.35 450C 0.18 033 550C 0.14 033 650C 0.08 0.28

temperatures are (1) generally more favorable than could be achieved at any temperature for the salt-free powders and (2) more resistant to thermal decay than the properties of the salt-free powders.

Working Example 4 A quantity of 71.4 grams of CoCl .6l-l,O was dissolved in 300 milliliters of water with 320 grams of sodium chloride which had passed a 425-mesh screen. This first solution was prepared in a Waring Blendor.

A second solution, containing 1 1.4 grams of sodium borohydride in milliliters of water, was prepared in a separatory funnel and then added dropwise to the Waring Blendor at the slowest agitation speed. The addition was slow enough to keep the exothermic reaction between the two solutions from increasing the temperature of the reaction medium much above 35C. Cobalt precipitated.

The precipitate, which included a large part of the original salt, was filtered, washed with 400 milliliters of acetone twice, redispersed in 400 milliliters of acetone, and air dried.

Forty grams of the dried material was enclosed in a glass container and heated to 350C in a hydrogen atmosphere, maintained at 350C for an hour, cooled while still under hydrogen, purged for 2 minutes with Saturation Magnetic Moment 91 e m u/gram Coercivity 500 oersteds Squareness 0.32

Working Example 5 Seventy-five milliliters of a 0.7 molar cobalt chloride and 0.3 molar FeCl solution is charged into a small stainless steel mixer which is maintained in a strong magnetic field of about 1,500 oersteds. A quantity of 75 milliliters of a one molar, aqueous, sodium borohydrate solution is slowly added to the solution of metal chlorides. The resultant reaction results in the precipitation of metallic particles which werewashed several times with water, washed with tetrahydrofuran, separated from the liquid with a magnet after each wash, and air dried.

The magnetic properties of the resulting cobalt-iron mixture were measured to be as follows:

Saturation Magnetic Moment 40 e m u/gram Coercivity 312 oersteds Squareness 0.42

Heat treatment data will be given under Example 8. Working Example 6 When the Example 5 was substantially repeated, but with 75 milliliters of a chloride solution 0.9 molar in cobalt chloride and 0.1 molar in FeCl the following magnetic properties were measured on the resulting product:

Saturation Magnetic Moment 33 Coercivity 88 Squareness 0.35

Heat treatment data will be given under Example 8. Working Example 7 v The, powder product described in Example 5 is mixed with 16 times its weight of sodium chloride powder which had passed a 425 mesh screen. Eighty-five grams of the resulting mixture was dispersed in 300 milliliters of ethyl alcohol and ball milled for 24 hours using stone balls and a l-quart capacity ceramic ball mill, then recovered and dried.

Heat treatment data will be given under Example 8. Working Example 8 This example describes the heat treatment of the powders which were produced by the procedure described in Examples 5, 6 and 7. I

Small samples of each of these materials were heat treated at various temperatures under an argon atmosphere. Each sample held at the treatment temperature for 80 minutes under an hydrogen atmosphere after being brought up to temperature under an argon atmosphere. Then the samples were cooled under hydrogen, and purged with argon. Each cooled sample was washed four times, with water, washed four times with tetrahydrofuran, air dried and dried further under a vacuum.

1n the following table the values of magnetic properties of the non-heated materials are placed in parentheses.

Treatment Temperature of 250C Saturation Product Magnetic Coercivity Squareness Source Moment Example 5 48 (40) (312) 0.43 (0.42) Example 6 58 (33) 200 (88) 0.44 (0.35) Example 7 28 457 0.42

Treatment Temperature of 350C Saturation Product Magnetic Coercivity Squareness Source Moment Example 5 81 (40) 850 (312) 0.41 (0.42) Example 6 7.4 (33) 250 (88) 0.41 (0.35) Example 7 76 712 0.37

It is clear, therefore, that the process of the invention provides a means to improve the magnetic properties of particles produced by reduction of dissolved metal salts within a strong magnetic field.

It is of course to be understood that the foregoing examplesare intended to be illustrative and that numerous changes can be made in the reactant proportions, and conditions set forth therein without departing from the spirit of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

What is claimed is:

1. In a process for making a magnetic metallic powder of the type comprising a major portion of cobalt metal wherein said process comprises the step of forming metal particles by reacting a reducing agent with a metallic salt in solution and a subsequent thermal treatment of dried metallic powder formed of said particles, the improvement comprising the steps of A. intimately mixing a quantity of inorganic refractory salt powder material with said dried metal particles, said quantity being an amount effective to separate said metal particles from one another to markedly reduce the physical interaction of said metal particles during heating then B. heat treating the resulting mixture at a temperature above 250 C. to enhance the magnetic properties thereof, and then C. separating said metal particles from said refractory powder thereby providing a mass of magnetic metallic particles of enhanced magnetic properties.

2. A process as defined in claim 1 wherein said salt dust is water-soluble salt.

3. A process as defined in claim 1 wherein ing is carried out for less than one hour at a temperature of about 450C or below.

4. A process as defined in claim 1 wherein said heat treating is carried out at a temperature of about 350C or below.

5. A process as defined in claim 1 wherein said heating is carried out until the coercive force exceeds 500 oersteds. I

6. A process as defined in claim 1 wherein said heating is carried out until the coercive force exceeds 500 oersteds.

7. A fine magnetic powder of cobalt and formed according to the process defined by claim 1.

said heat-

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1838831 *Sep 17, 1927Dec 29, 1931Ig Farbenindustrie AgMetallic core for electromagnets
US2503947 *Mar 6, 1948Apr 11, 1950Comm Engineering Pty LtdMethod of molidng magnetic powder
US2885366 *Jun 28, 1956May 5, 1959Du PontProduct comprising a skin of dense, hydrated amorphous silica bound upon a core of another solid material and process of making same
US2974104 *Apr 8, 1955Mar 7, 1961Gen ElectricHigh-energy magnetic material
US3188247 *Oct 29, 1962Jun 8, 1965North American Phillips CompanUse of the hexagonal phase of the compound (fe, co)2p in particle size permanent magnets
US3206338 *May 10, 1963Sep 14, 1965Du PontNon-pyrophoric, ferromagnetic acicular particles and their preparation
US3255052 *Dec 9, 1963Jun 7, 1966Magnetics IncFlake magnetic core and method of making same
US3535104 *May 23, 1969Oct 20, 1970Du PontFerromagnetic particles containing chromium
US3567525 *Jun 25, 1968Mar 2, 1971Du PontHeat treated ferromagnetic particles
US3663318 *Oct 5, 1970May 16, 1972Du PontProcess for making ferromagnetic metal powders
US3669643 *May 5, 1970Jun 13, 1972Bell Telephone Labor IncMethod for the preparation of small cobalt particles
US3672867 *Dec 7, 1970Jun 27, 1972Du PontSubmicron ferromagnetic alloy particles containing cobalt,boron,and zinc
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1 *Thrush, P. W. et al., (Edit.) Dictionary of Mining, Minerology & Related Terms (U.S. Dept. Interior), 1968, pp. 908 & 956.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3855016 *Jun 28, 1973Dec 17, 1974Graham Magnetics IncAcicular cobalt powders having high squarenesss ratios
US4031786 *Aug 11, 1975Jun 28, 1977Warwick Electronics Inc.Tone selector circuit with multiplexed tone data transfer
US4097313 *Nov 22, 1976May 27, 1978Tdk Electronics Co., Ltd.Method of recovery of ferromagnetic metal or alloy particles by using a magnetic drum
US4146504 *Sep 26, 1974Mar 27, 1979Graham Magnetics Inc.Porous powders and a method for their preparation
Classifications
U.S. Classification148/105, 148/112, 148/102, 75/253, 148/103, 75/374
International ClassificationH01F1/06, H01F1/032, B22F1/00
Cooperative ClassificationH01F1/065, B22F1/0085
European ClassificationH01F1/06D, B22F1/00B1
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
May 18, 1992ASAssignment
Owner name: CARLISLE MEMORY PRODUCTSS GROUP INCORPORATED, STAT
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:GRAHAM MAGNETICS INCORPORATED;REEL/FRAME:006273/0407
Effective date: 19890123
Owner name: GRAHAM MAGNETICS INCORPORATED A DELAWARE CORPOR
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNORS:CARLISLE COMPANIES INCORPORATED A DELAWARE CORPORATION;CARLISLE CORPORATION A DELAWARE CORPORATION;DATA ELECTRONICS INCORPORATED A DELAWARE CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:006273/0396
Effective date: 19881207
May 18, 1992AS03Merger
Owner name: CARLISLE COMPANIES INCORPORATED A DELAWARE CORPORA
Owner name: CARLISLE CORPORATION A
Owner name: GRAHAM MAGNETICS INCORPORATED A DELAWARE CORPORATE
Effective date: 19881207
Feb 15, 1991ASAssignment
Owner name: VISTATECH CORPORATION, A CORP. OF DE, NEW YORK
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:CARLISLE MEMORY PRODUCTS GROUP INCORPORATED, A CORP. OF DE;REEL/FRAME:005600/0752
Effective date: 19910131
Feb 15, 1991AS02Assignment of assignor's interest
Owner name: CARLISLE MEMORY PRODUCTS GROUP INCORPORATED, A COR
Owner name: VISTATECH CORPORATION, 101 S. SALINA ST., STE. 800
Effective date: 19910131