|Publication number||US3755803 A|
|Publication date||Aug 28, 1973|
|Filing date||Mar 31, 1970|
|Priority date||Apr 2, 1969|
|Also published as||DE2015295A1, DE2015295C2|
|Publication number||US 3755803 A, US 3755803A, US-A-3755803, US3755803 A, US3755803A|
|Inventors||P Cole, R Vaughn|
|Original Assignee||Unisearch Ltd|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (13), Referenced by (73), Classifications (35)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
United tates 1 1 Cole et ai. Aug. 28, 1973 ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM 2',s99,s46""'8/19s9 Hollmann gig/2.:
. 2,774,060 l2 1956 Th  Invemm Adelalde; 3,493,955 2/ 1970 340/258 Richard Vaughn Mamubra N 3,577,136 5/1971 Wolf 340/280 uth Wales. both of Australia 3,389,391 6/1968 Keeler et a]. 343/6.8  Assignee: Unisearch Limited, Kensington, New FOREIGN PATENTS OR APPLICATIONS wales l,085,7 04 10/1967 Great Britain 340/280  Filed: Mar. 31, 1970 1 Primary Examiner-John W. Caldwell ] Appl' 2431? V 7 mm Assistant ExamineF-Scott F. Partridge Foreign Application Priority Data Attorney-McGlcw & Toren Apr. 2, 1969 Australia ..52968/69 ABSTRACT An electronic surveillance system in which a passive 'i 253; label attached to an article under surveillance is inter-  m i 340/258 280 282 rogated by means ofa transmitted signal in a first form 3 g z 5 I 310/8 8 of energy, the label using the energy of that signal to return a signal to a receiver which gives an indication of the presence of the label if a reply signal has predeter-  References Cited mined characteristics. In order to enable the receiver UNITED STATES PATENTS to distinguish the reply signal from the original trans- 3,432,852 3/1969 Arnold 343/ mitted signal the label is constructed to produce the 3,63l,442 l2/l97l FCUBI'OH 343/6.8 reply signal in a form of energy different from that of 31500373 3/l970 Mmasy 340/280 x the original transmitted signal. It is preferred that the gzgagg' first form of energy is accoustic energy and the second 3:52l:280 7/1970 Janco et all. .3. 343/6.8 energy is electmmagnefic energy 3,399,405 8/1968 Daniel, Jr. 343/6.8 X 14 Claims, 6 Drawing Figures TRANS/M7752 ANTi/V/VA 05mm g LABEL MAa/wmm.
ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM The facilities offered by the present invention provide for the open or secret interrogation by radio and- /or acoustic waves of information from prepared passive labels by a remote sensing apparatus.
The intended application of the invention is in the prevention of theft of merchandise from shops or warehouses, of books in libraries or of appropriate items in factories or other places, by tagging such items with a label and locating a receiver covering each exit so that the unauthorised passage of such tagged items through each exit will be detected.
The basic principle of operation of any interrogating system for passive labels is as follows. Energy in some form is transmitted to the label by a transmitter and transmitting antenna unit. This energy is then processed in some way by the label, and the resulting energy retransmitted by the label as a reply" signal. This reply energy is then detected, suitably processed and information extracted therefrom by a sensitive receiver and receiving antenna unit. It is basic to all interrogation systems that the very small reply energy from the label be distinguished from the very much larger transmitter or interrogation energy. This distinction can be obtained by various methods; the present invention utilises a method which achieves the desired result by incorporating means in the label capable of changing the type of the energy, so that the reply energy is of a different type from the interrogate energy. For example in the system described below, the interrogate energy is in the form of acoustic energy while the reply energy is in the form of magnetic field energy.
To be successful the system should and does provide the following features:
a. The labels are passive, with indefinitely long storage life, can be read non destructively, are durable under various environmental and handling conditions, are small and have low manufacturing cost.
b. The labels can have any orientation relative to and considerable distance from the-sensing apparatus, can be in motion, and can be separated from the sensor by optically opaque barriers.
c. The signal is distinguishable from background clutter signals accidentally produced by the environment of the label being interrogated.
A distinction from clutter signals and the encoding of the information is made by choosing a combination of the type of interrogate energy and type of reply energy such that apart from the label, objects found in nature do not possess the necessary combination of characten istics to enable them to receive the type of interrogation energy, to convert this energy to the correct type of reply energy, and then re-radiate this reply energy in the correct way.
In order to assist in understanding the nature of the invention one form thereof is hereinafter described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. I is a block diagram showing the basic components of the system,
FIG. 2 is an isometric view of a label card for use with the system,
FIGS. 3 and 4 are views in plan and elevation of the label card showing further details, and
FIG. 5 shows one electrode configuration for the resonator incorporated in the label.
FIG. 6 is a block diagram of a pulsed system.
The system to be described is intended for detecting the presence only of a label at a distance of l metre, as might be required for example in a theft-detection system.
The general principleof the system is to provide in the label card a means of receiving energy in acoustic fonn, converting it to electromagnetic energy, and reradiating it as electromagnetic energy or more precisely in this case as magnetic energy. Since the transmitted energy is in acoustic form, and the reply from the label is in a different energy form, namely magnetic, it is thus possible to separate the small label reply from the large transmitted interrogate signal.
The basic components of the system are shown in the block diagram in FIG. 1. The system consists of a. An W, IOOkc/s power oscillator l,
b. A suitable electrical-to-acoustic energy transducer and acoustic antennae unit 2, (For example a barium titanate piezoelectric resonator coupled to the atmosphere by an acoustic horn) which is driven by the power oscillator l and radiates acoustic energy through the air illuminating the volume through-out which it is desired to detect the label,
c. A label 3 described in detail below,
d. A magnetic coil pair 4 connected to a sensitive receiver 5 which detects the reply magnetic field produced by the label when illuminated by the acoustic field. I
The construction of a suitable passive label is shown in the isometric drawing FIG. 2. The label consists of an inner plastic card 6 approximately 2 by 1 inches in size which serves as a protection and supporting substrate for the inner sensitive elements. Cardboard covers 7 and 8 sufficiently thin so as to be essentially transparent to I00 kc/s acoustic radiation, are glued to each side of the plastic card. Further details of the label are shown in FIGS. 3 and 4. In FIG. 3 the plastic card 6 and sensitive element 5 are shown with the cardboard covers 7 and 8 removed.
The acoustic energy is detected by its action in causing resonant vibration of a I00 kc/s flexural-mode resonator 9. In this example the resonator 9 shall be taken as being made of quartz, however any other material having suitable mechanical properties, low acoustic damping, and high piezoelectric coefficients could be used. The flexural vibration mode is used to lower the acoustic impedance level of the resonator and hence to provide a better acoustic impedance match to the air.
Approximate dimensions of the resonator 9 are 1.5 cm long by 0.75 cm wide by 0.010 inch thick. The resonator 9 is set into a cut-out in the plastic card 6, between but not in contact with the cardboard covers 7 and 8. In order to cause minimum damping by its support, it is held at the flexural-mode vibrational nodal-points by four dimples projecting from the sides of the cut-out in the plastic card.
Suitable electrodes are plated onto the resonator 9, one possible electrode configuration being shown in FIG. 5, such that the acoustic vibrational energy in the resonator is converted to electrical energy available between the electrodes 10 and 11 through the piezoelectric properties of the quartz.
This electrical energy, or more precisely the piezoelectric displacement current between electrodes 10 and 11, produces a current through a 10 turn, one square inch area coil 12 connected between electrodes and 11. Coil 12 is conveniently produced on the surface of the plastic card 6 by well-known printed circuitboard techniques. The magnetic field produced by this current flow through coil 12 is then detected by the Helmohltz coil pair 4 and receiver 5, thus enabling the presence of the label to be detected as required.
Calculations show that the power losses occurring in various parts of the overall transmission path from transmitter to receiver are:
a. Acoustic propogation loss from the acoustic transmitter antenna 2 to the acoustic resonator or receiving antenna 9 in the label, 4ldb.
b. Acoustic path absorption between the acoustic transmitting antenna and the label, 3db.
0. Acoustic to electric conversion loss in resonator 9 lOdb.
d. Magnetic propogation loss" between the reactive power available at the resonator 9 output electrodes 10 and 11 to the real power magnetically induced in the receiving coil-pair 4 75db.
The overall transmission path loss is thus l29db.
The noise bandwidth of the receiver is 1000 c/s. Narrower bandwidths are not practical due to the acoustic Doppler shift associated with a person carrying the label through the field. The consequent input noise level of the receiver allowing for a receiver noise figure of 3db is 17ldbW. With a transmitted power of.+ 20 dbW, the input signal level at the receiver is l09dbW. The signal-to-noise ratio at the receiver is thus 62db and the system is not receiver noise limited.
There are certain obvious variations from the design example described in detail above which may be made to suit particular applications.
In particular some of them are:
a. The frequency of operation of the system can be decreased or increased. Decreasing the frequency improves the system signal to noise ratio, however the size of the label is also increased. Increasing the frequency reduces the system signal to noise ratio and decreases the size of the labels. The attenuation of acoustic waves through the air also increases with frequency and this has the important advantage of increasing the discrimination of the system against spurious signals from labels outside the desired detection volume since these signals suffer attenuation due to the longer acoustic propogation path. For example at an operating frequency of 200 KHZ acoustic attenuation in air is 8 db/m. Consequently signals from extraneous labels will be attenuated by 8 db per metre of their distance from the detection volume.
b. Due to reciprocity, the system can also be operated in reverse in the sense that magnetic field energy can be transmitted to the label by the coil-pair 4, converted to and re-radiated as acoustic energy by the label, and this acoustic energy received by the acoustic transducer-antenna 2. This alternative system can have advantages in installations where the atmospheric magnetic field noise energy is higher than the atmospheric acoustic noise energy. Atmospheric acoustic noise energy is normally low at 100 KHZ and increasingly so at higher frequencies due to the acoustic attenuation of the air at these frequencies.
c. Changes may be made in transmitter power level.
(1. As previously stated, due to acoustic Doppler shift, receiver bandwidths of less than 1000 c/s are not possible. Hence system signal to noise ratio cannot be increased by using narrow receiver bandwidths. However for the same average transmitted power, it is possible to obtain an increase in signal to noise ratio effectively equivalent to that achieved by narrowing the receiver bandwidth by pulsing the transmitter and synchronously time gating the receiver. The transmitter pulse width will be determined by the receiver bandwidth, and the pulse repetition frequency by the rate at which a label will be carried through the detection volume. For a constant average transmitted power, the signalto-noise ratio is increased by the ratio of the pulse repetition period divided by the pulse width. For the particular embodiment here described, suitable values are a transmitter pulse length of 6 m/sec, a pulse repetition period of 300 m/sec, with the receiver synchronously gated on for a 3 m/sec period following 3 m/sec after the commencement of each transmitter pulse.
One particular embodiment of such a pulse system is shown in FIG. 6. The principal components are:
l. A IW, IOOkc/s master oscillator 13,
2. A 37 db, l00kc/s gated power amphifier 14 which when gated on by pulse generator 15 delivers W average power, 5 kW peak power to antenna unit 21. Amplifier 14 is gated on for a 6 msec pulse period with a pulse repetition period of 300 in see by pulse generator 15.
3. A suitable electrical-to-acoustic energy transducer and acoustic antenna unit 21, which is driven by power amplifier l4 and radiates acoustic energy through the air illuminating the volume through-out which it is desired to obtect the label.
4. A label 22 identical to label 3 previously described.
5. A magnetic coil pair 24 connected to a sensitive receiver 18 which detects the reply magnetic field produced by the label when illuminated by the acoustic field. The bandwidth of receiver 18 is l000c/s.
6. A gate 19 following receiver 18 which is gated open by pulse generator 17 for a 3 m sec period following 3 in see after the commencement of each transmitter pulse.
7. A final amplifier and detector unit 20 of bandwidth l000c/s which operates an appropriate alarm equipment if the detector output exceeds a certain threshold level during the on-gated period.
8. An as table multivibrator pulse generator 15 which provides a 6 in sec pulse having a 300 in sec pulse repetition rate to gated amplifier 14 plus a trigger pulse to delay generator 16 synchronised with the leading edge of the gating pulse to 14.
9. A monostable multivibrator pulse generator 16 which is triggered by the trigger pulse from 15 and hence provides a second trigger pulse to pulse generator l7 delayed 3 m see after the trigger pulse from l5.
10. A monostable pulse generator 17 which is triggered by the delayed trigger pulse from 16 and whence provides a 3 m sec duration on-gating pulse to receiver gate 19.
e. The use of a pulse system as described in (d) above also enables the system to eliminate spurious returns from labels outside the desired detection volume by taking account of the longer acoustic propogation time to such remote labels. For example for a transmitter pulse length of 6 m sec and a receiver gate interval of 3 m sec as described in (d) above, returns from labels at distances greater than 1.8 m will be eliminated.
The particular embodiment herein described has used in the label a resonator of piezoelectric material which converted received acoustic energy to electrical energy by menas of the piezoelectric effect. It is also possible to use a resonator of magnetostrictive material which converts received acoustic energy to electrical energy by means of the magnetostructive effect. In the latter case the fluctuating magnetic moment induced in the magnetostrictive material would be detected directly by a receiver coil-pair 4 and no transmitting coil 12 would be necessary on the label.
1. An electronic surveillance system, comprising transmitter means for transmitting signals having a first form of energy, a passive label for attachment to an article to be placed under surveillance, signal answering means mounted on said label for receiving the signals from said transmitting means and producing signals having a second form of energy and corresponding to the received signals, receiver means responsive to the signals transmitted by said signal answering means for receiving and processing the signals of the second form of energy, control means for defining a surveillance volume, said control means including modulator means coupled to said transmitter means and rendering said receiver means unresponsive to signals from said answering means when the phase of the signals from said answering means relative to the phase of signals from said transmitter means exceeds a given value.
2. A system as in claim 1, wherein said modulator means constrains said transmitter means to produce a series of regular pulses and gate said receiver means synchronously so as to switch on said receiver means at a predetermined time after the commencement of each transmitter pulse and for a predetermined period.
3. A system as in claim 1, wherein one of said transmitter means and said answering means transmit acoustical energy.
4. A system as in claim 1, wherein said transmitter means transmits acoustical energy.
5. A system as in claim 1, wherein said answering means transmits acoustical energy.
6. A system as in claim 4, wherein said answering means transmits electromagnetic energy.
7. A system as in claim 5, wherein said transmitter means transmits electromagnetic energy.
8. A system as in claim 1, wherein said answering means includes second receiver means on said label for receiving the signals of the first form of energy, transducer means on said label coupled to said receiver means for responding to the signals on said second receiver means for forming signals of the second form of energy, and second transmitter means on said label responsive to said transducer means for transmitting the signals of the second form of energy.
9. A system as in claim 1, wherein said answering means includes an electroacoustic resonator on said label.
10. A system as in claim 9, wherein-said resonator is piezoelectric.
11. A system as in claim 9, wherein said resonator is magnetostrictive.
12. An apparatus as in claim 10, wherein said answering means includes an antenna connected to said resonator.
13. A system as in claim 1, wherein said label includes a plastic card having a cutout, said answering means including a piezoelectric resonator adapted to vibrate in a flexural mode, said resonator including electrodes attached to the surface of said piezoelectric resonator, and an antenna formed on the surface of the card connected to said electrodes.
14. A system as in claim 13, wherein said label includes covering means sandwiching the plastic card between them for protecting the resonator and said antenna.
a a: a a: a
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2774060 *||Jun 15, 1953||Dec 11, 1956||Dale Belford||Detecting means for stolen goods|
|US2899546 *||May 25, 1954||Aug 11, 1959||hollmann|
|US3031643 *||May 16, 1960||Apr 24, 1962||Nat Company Inc||Transmission line fence burglar alarm|
|US3293595 *||Dec 6, 1963||Dec 20, 1966||Hitachi Ltd||Telemetering system|
|US3389391 *||May 5, 1967||Jun 18, 1968||Keeler Miner S||Vehicle identification responder|
|US3399405 *||Mar 29, 1966||Aug 27, 1968||Rca Corp||Vehicle identifier system|
|US3432852 *||Jun 19, 1967||Mar 11, 1969||Sylvania Electric Prod||Transponder having improved isolation|
|US3493955 *||Apr 17, 1968||Feb 3, 1970||Monere Corp||Method and apparatus for detecting the unauthorized movement of articles|
|US3500373 *||May 6, 1966||Mar 10, 1970||Nat Bank Of North America The||Method and apparatus for article theft detection|
|US3521280 *||Jan 16, 1969||Jul 21, 1970||Gen Res Corp||Coded labels|
|US3577136 *||Aug 4, 1967||May 4, 1971||Security Systems Inc||Short-range signaling system|
|US3631442 *||Mar 22, 1968||Dec 28, 1971||Robert E Fearon||Anti-shoplifting system|
|GB1085704A *||Title not available|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3849633 *||Jul 17, 1973||Nov 19, 1974||Westinghouse Electric Corp||Object identifying apparatus|
|US3914829 *||Jun 1, 1973||Oct 28, 1975||Eaton Corp||Releasably attachable clip|
|US4000488 *||Apr 19, 1974||Dec 28, 1976||Bernard Ephraim||Label alarm system|
|US4134538 *||Mar 16, 1977||Jan 16, 1979||La Societe Metalimphy||Process and apparatus for identification of objects|
|US4223830 *||Aug 18, 1978||Sep 23, 1980||Walton Charles A||Identification system|
|US4236068 *||Mar 29, 1979||Nov 25, 1980||Walton Charles A||Personal identification and signaling system|
|US4342904 *||Oct 27, 1980||Aug 3, 1982||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Lightweight ferromagnetic marker for the detection of objects having markers secured thereto|
|US4600829 *||Apr 2, 1984||Jul 15, 1986||Walton Charles A||Electronic proximity identification and recognition system with isolated two-way coupling|
|US4604623 *||Jun 30, 1983||Aug 5, 1986||X-Cyte Inc.||Surface acoustic wave passive transponder having non-reflective transducers and pads|
|US4605929 *||Jun 30, 1983||Aug 12, 1986||X-Cyte Inc.||Surface acoustic wave passive transponder having optimally-sized transducers|
|US4620191 *||Jun 30, 1983||Oct 28, 1986||Halvor Skeie||Surface acoustic wave passive transponder having parallel acoustic wave paths|
|US4625207 *||Jun 30, 1983||Nov 25, 1986||X-Cyte Inc.||Surface acoustic wave passive transponder having amplitude and phase-modifying surface pads|
|US4625208 *||Jun 30, 1983||Nov 25, 1986||X-Cyte Inc.||Surface acoustic wave passive transponder having acoustic wave reflectors|
|US4725841 *||Jun 30, 1983||Feb 16, 1988||X-Cyte, Inc.||System for interrogating a passive transponder carrying phase-encoded information|
|US4798175 *||Oct 9, 1986||Jan 17, 1989||Alfa-Laval Agri, Inc.||Electronic identification system|
|US4818855 *||Jan 7, 1986||Apr 4, 1989||Indala Corporation||Identification system|
|US5012224 *||Aug 3, 1990||Apr 30, 1991||Sensormatic Electronics Corporation||Audible tag for magnetic electronic article surveillance systems|
|US5021767 *||Oct 12, 1988||Jun 4, 1991||N.V. Nederlandsche Apparatenfabriek Nedap||Method and an apparatus for electronically identifying articles moving along a surface|
|US5367289 *||Nov 27, 1991||Nov 22, 1994||Sensormatic Electronics Corporation||Alarm tag for an electronic article surveillance system|
|US5523749 *||Apr 3, 1992||Jun 4, 1996||Integrated Silicon Design Pty. Ltd.||Identification system for simultaneously interrogated labels|
|US5552778 *||Nov 23, 1994||Sep 3, 1996||International Business Machines Corporation||Multibit bimorph magnetic tags using acoustic or magnetic interrogation for identification of an object coupled thereto|
|US5767773 *||Jul 28, 1995||Jun 16, 1998||Kubota Corporation||Theft preventive apparatus and radio wave receiving signaling device|
|US5793305 *||Sep 29, 1995||Aug 11, 1998||Turner; Leigh Holbrook||Article sorting system|
|US5844484 *||Aug 25, 1994||Dec 1, 1998||Kubota Corporation||Theft preventive apparatus having alarm output|
|US5883575 *||Aug 12, 1997||Mar 16, 1999||Hewlett-Packard Company||RF-tags utilizing thin film bulk wave acoustic resonators|
|US5959532 *||Jul 27, 1995||Sep 28, 1999||Kubota Corporation||Theft preventive apparatus and radio wave receiving signaling device|
|US5986382 *||Aug 18, 1997||Nov 16, 1999||X-Cyte, Inc.||Surface acoustic wave transponder configuration|
|US6020819 *||Feb 12, 1998||Feb 1, 2000||Kubota Corporation||Radio wave receiving signaling device|
|US6060815 *||Aug 18, 1997||May 9, 2000||X-Cyte, Inc.||Frequency mixing passive transponder|
|US6107910 *||Aug 18, 1997||Aug 22, 2000||X-Cyte, Inc.||Dual mode transmitter/receiver and decoder for RF transponder tags|
|US6114971 *||Aug 18, 1997||Sep 5, 2000||X-Cyte, Inc.||Frequency hopping spread spectrum passive acoustic wave identification device|
|US6144299 *||Jul 4, 1997||Nov 7, 2000||Integrated Silicon Design Pty. Ltd.||Presence and data labels|
|US6208062||Feb 10, 1999||Mar 27, 2001||X-Cyte, Inc.||Surface acoustic wave transponder configuration|
|US6229442 *||Mar 14, 2000||May 8, 2001||Motorola, Inc,||Radio frequency identification device having displacement current control and method thereof|
|US6259991||Feb 10, 1999||Jul 10, 2001||X-Cyte Inc.||Environmental location system|
|US6531957 *||May 17, 2002||Mar 11, 2003||X-Cyte, Inc.||Dual mode transmitter-receiver and decoder for RF transponder tags|
|US6535108||Aug 18, 1998||Mar 18, 2003||Intermec Ip Corp.||Modulation of the resonant frequency of a circuit using an energy field|
|US6611224 *||May 14, 2002||Aug 26, 2003||X-Cyte, Inc.||Backscatter transponder interrogation device|
|US6633226||Feb 10, 1999||Oct 14, 2003||X-Cyte, Inc.||Frequency hopping spread spectrum passive acoustic wave identification device|
|US6724311||Nov 20, 2001||Apr 20, 2004||B&G Plastics, Inc.||Anti-theft hang tag|
|US6775616||Aug 20, 2003||Aug 10, 2004||X-Cyte, Inc.||Environmental location system|
|US6950009||Jun 17, 2003||Sep 27, 2005||X-Cyte, Inc.||Dual mode transmitter/receiver and decoder for RF transponder units|
|US6995654||Dec 15, 2000||Feb 7, 2006||X-Cyte, Inc.||Apparatus and method for locating a tagged item|
|US7023323||Oct 14, 2003||Apr 4, 2006||X-Cyte, Inc.||Frequency hopping spread spectrum passive acoustic wave identification device|
|US7086593 *||Apr 30, 2004||Aug 8, 2006||The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration||Magnetic field response measurement acquisition system|
|US7123129||Mar 18, 2003||Oct 17, 2006||Intermec Ip Corp.||Modulation of the resonant frequency of a circuit using an energy field|
|US7132778||Aug 20, 2003||Nov 7, 2006||X-Cyte, Inc.||Surface acoustic wave modulator|
|US7159774 *||Dec 16, 2005||Jan 9, 2007||The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration||Magnetic field response measurement acquisition system|
|US7741956||Jun 22, 2010||X-Cyte, Inc.||Dual mode transmitter-receiver and decoder for RF transponder tags|
|US8167204 *||Oct 17, 2008||May 1, 2012||The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration||Wireless damage location sensing system|
|US8497776 *||Dec 29, 2010||Jul 30, 2013||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Radio frequency identification system and method used to perform electronic article surveillance|
|US8692562||Aug 1, 2011||Apr 8, 2014||Wireless open-circuit in-plane strain and displacement sensor requiring no electrical connections|
|US9285471||Nov 21, 2005||Mar 15, 2016||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.||Method and apparatus for localization of RFID tags|
|US20020075152 *||Dec 15, 2000||Jun 20, 2002||Paul Nysen||Apparatus and method for locating a tagged item|
|US20040069847 *||Oct 15, 2002||Apr 15, 2004||Chester Kolton||Electronic article surveillance marker assembly|
|US20050007239 *||Apr 30, 2004||Jan 13, 2005||U.S.A. As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration||Magnetic field response measurement acquisition system|
|US20050270159 *||Jun 18, 2005||Dec 8, 2005||Brady Michael J||Combination radio frequency identification transponder (RFID Tag) and magnetic electronic article surveillance (EAS) tag|
|US20060124740 *||Dec 16, 2005||Jun 15, 2006||U.S.A. As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration||Magnetic field response measurement acquisition system|
|US20070115137 *||Nov 21, 2005||May 24, 2007||Lyon Geoff M||Method and apparatus for localization of RFID tags|
|US20090109005 *||Oct 17, 2008||Apr 30, 2009||Usa As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics & Space Administration||Wireless Damage Location Sensing System|
|US20120169500 *||Dec 29, 2010||Jul 5, 2012||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Radio frequency identification system and method used to perform electronic article surveillance|
|USRE29610 *||May 7, 1975||Apr 11, 1978||Knogo Corporation||Field strength uniformity control system|
|DE3438051A1 *||Oct 17, 1984||Apr 24, 1986||X Cyte Inc||Akustische reflektoren aufweisender, passiver transponder auf akustische oberflaechenwellen|
|DE3438052A1 *||Oct 17, 1984||Apr 24, 1986||X Cyte Inc||System zum abfragen eines passiven, phasenkodierte informationen aufweisenden transponders|
|EP0340015A2 *||Apr 27, 1989||Nov 2, 1989||Esselte Meto International GmbH||Antipilferage tags and systems|
|EP0341828A1 *||Apr 10, 1989||Nov 15, 1989||Esselte Meto International GmbH||Antipilferage tags and their use|
|EP0431343A2 *||Nov 9, 1990||Jun 12, 1991||Sensormatic Electronics Corporation||Audible tag for magnetic electronic article surveillance systems|
|EP0615285A2 *||Mar 11, 1994||Sep 14, 1994||British Technology Group Limited||Attaching an electronic circuit to a substrate|
|WO1986004171A1 *||Jan 10, 1986||Jul 17, 1986||Indala Corporation||Identification system|
|WO1989009984A1 *||Apr 10, 1989||Oct 19, 1989||Scientific Generics Limited||Antipilferage tags and their use|
|WO2000075038A1 *||Mar 24, 2000||Dec 14, 2000||Cascades Arnsberg Gmbh||Commercial packaging|
|WO2007061836A2 *||Nov 16, 2006||May 31, 2007||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.||Method and apparatus for localization of rfid tags|
|WO2007061836A3 *||Nov 16, 2006||Feb 21, 2008||Hewlett Packard Development Co||Method and apparatus for localization of rfid tags|
|U.S. Classification||340/572.1, 235/439, 367/2, 340/531, 340/572.8, 340/572.7, 340/552, 235/487, 235/488, 334/39, 367/93|
|International Classification||G06K7/00, G06K7/08, G06K7/10, G06K19/067, G06K7/02, G08B13/24|
|Cooperative Classification||G08B13/2422, G08B13/2471, G06K7/10009, G06K7/086, G06K7/02, G06K7/0008, G08B13/24, G06K19/0672, G08B13/2437|
|European Classification||G08B13/24B1M, G08B13/24B7A1, G08B13/24B3M, G06K7/02, G06K7/00E, G08B13/24, G06K7/08C2Q, G06K7/10A, G06K19/067Q|