Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3759009 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateSep 18, 1973
Filing dateJan 28, 1971
Priority dateJan 28, 1971
Publication numberUS 3759009 A, US 3759009A, US-A-3759009, US3759009 A, US3759009A
InventorsRansome F
Original AssigneeGordon T Kinder
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Composite load bearing panels
US 3759009 A
Abstract
Composite, load bearing panels comprising two thin metal sheets, preferably mild steel, having a low density cementatious core material therebetween. Each metal sheet has a plurality of integral keys pressed angularly outward the refrom to extend into the cementatious core material. The keys of one sheet, which extend to a depth greater than 50 per cent of the thickness of the core material, are alternately spaced in relation to the keys of the other sheet and act both as a mechanical bond for the sheets and the core material and as reinforcement to the panel giving it substantial strength in both tension and compression.
Images(1)
Previous page
Next page
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Unite States Patent 1191 Ransome 1 1 Sept. 18, 1973 [54] COMPOSITE LOAD BEARING PANELS 1,213,564 12/1959 France 52/378 [75] Inventor: Frank F. Ransome, Livingston, NJ. OTHER PUBLICATIONS [73] Assignee: Gordon T. Kinder, Martins Ferry, ()hi Text: International Congress on Lightweight Concrete, Vol. I, May 1968, pages 78, 194, William Clowes and [22] 1971 Sons, Ltd., London Scientific Library Call No. TP884, 21 Appl. No.: 110,409 L515, 1968.

[52] US. Cl 52/598, 52/588, 52/598, Prir nary ExaminerFrank L. Abbott 52/599, 52/725, 52/735 Assistant Examiner-James L. Ridgill, Jr. [51] 'Int. Cl. E04b 5/04, E04c 2/26 AttorneyWebb, Burden, Robinson & Webb [58] Field of Search ..52/596-599, 724, 725, 727, 425, 612, 334,

569, 430, 574, 436, 588 57 ST CT [56] References C ted Composite, load bearing panels comprising two thin UNITED STATES PATENTS metal sheets, preferably mild steel, having a low density 3 518 801 7 1970 Redey 52/425 cementum maerial herebetwem Each metal Z 6/191 1 Lewen 52/593 sheet has a plurality of integral keys pressed angularly 1,590,650 6/1926 s h k 52 2 outward the refrom to extend into the cementatious 1,837,451 12/1931 Lee 52/599 core material. The keys of one sheet, which extend to 1,956,354 4/1934 Junkers.... 521378 a depth greater than 50 per cent of the thickness of the 2,023,452 1935 =g 52/5'97 core material, are alternately spaced in relation to the 2,064,910 12/1936 Harper 5 k s of the other sheet and act both as a mechanical s bond for the sheets and the core material and as rein- 1,988,613 1/1935 TenorQlQ: 1:: 52/378 m the Panel l Substantial strength in both tension and compression. FOREIGN PATENTS OR APPLICATIONS 957,742 5/ 1964 Great Britain 52/597 7 Claims, 4 Drawing Figures PATENTEB SEPI 8 I975 Fig. 3

INVENTOR.

FRANK F. RANSOME 1 COMPOSITE LOAD BEARING PANELS My invention relates to composite panels and, more particularly, to load bearing panels having thin metal faces and a cementatious core material therebetween.

Load bearing panels often require considerations beyond the primary requisite of sufficient strength to support a given load. These additional properties can be any or all of fire resistance, sound absorption, easy fastenability to various support members and the ability to interlock with adjacent panels to form a complete load bearing structure. Metal products such as steel plates possess some of these properties, but others such as sound absorption and fastenability are lacking. In addition, the weight of the plates often create handling problems and the cost of such plates may be prohibitive. On the other hand, various types of cementatious materials qualify for many of the secondary considerations, but because of their inherent low tensile strength, they cannot be satisfactorily used in and of themselves as load bearing panels subjected to beam type loading.

To overcome-these individual problems, I have utilized the advantageous attributes of both the metals and the cementatious materials to achieve a composite panel which is structurally sound. At the same time, the panel is lightweight, highly fire resistant and can be easily made sound absorbing. Further, the panels may be easily fastened to various support members and may be.

interlocked with each other to form the desired structural member.

My invention is a composite load bearing-panel in which light gauge sheet metal, preferably mild steel, form the panel faces which are separated by a cementations core material. A plurality of mechanical keys are pressed at an angle from the face of the sheets to form a mechanical bond between the core material and the sheets. The keys extend beyond 50 per cent of the thickness of the core material and are preferably alternately spaced in rows with respect to keys of the same face, as well as the opposing face to maximize the reinforcement of the panel.

In the accompanying drawings, I have shown my presently preferred embodiments in which:

FIG. 1 is an isometric of my composite panel;

FIG. 2 is a section taken along section lines II-II FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a section taken along of FIG. 1; and

FIG. 4 shows the interlocking of adjacent panels.

My composite load bearing panel, generally designated 10, includes a top face 11 and a bottom face 12 made from a metal such as mild steel and having a cementatious core material 13 therebetween, see FIG. 1. The sides 19 and 20 of the panel are merely extensions of the faces 11 and 12 and will be described in detail hereinafter.

The top and bottom faces 11 and 12, respectively, are mechanically bonded to the cementatious core material 13 by means of a plurality of keys 14 which are integral with their respective faces and which depend outwardly therefrom at an angle into the cementatious core 13. These keys 14 play a vital role in the overall performance of the load bearing panel 10, for they not only anchor the composite panel in assembled relationship by mechanical bonding, but they act as'reinforcers for the panel so that the panel has substantial strength in tension and compression.

section lines III-III movement of the faces in either direction under load conditions. Where'the load condition will be light or in one direction only, the angularity of the keys may varyfrom but, of course, the 90 angularity provides an added safety factor.

The depth of the keys 14 with regard to the thickness of the cementatious core 13 is also very critical and should be greater than 50 per cent of that depth so that the keys 14 of the top and bottom faces 11 and 12 overlap. Then it is not possible to have a straight shear plane through the core material since any shear plane would be continually disrupted by the keys 14 of either or both the top and bottom sheets 11 and 12, respectively.

In addition, the keys 14 should be staggered to optimize the reinforcing effects and the mechanical bond strength. I have found that satisfactory conditions are achieved when'the keys 14 of the top face 11 and bottom face 12 are staggered and alternated in directions crosswise, as well as lengthwise of the panel 10. For example, such a crosswise plane is shown in FIG. 2 where the keys 14 of the bottom face 12 alternate with the keys 14 of the top face 11. The same type of alternating relationship between the keys of the top face 11 and the keys of the bottom face 12 is shown in FIG. 3 for a-plane extending lengthwise of the panel 10. This staggering of the keys 14 is easily achieved by pressing the keys 14 to form rows. The keys of one row are staggered with respect to keys of adjacent rows, see FIG. 1. Therefore, keys of every other row are not traversed by a straight lengthwise plane passing therethrough, see FIG. 3 where the rows containing untraversed keys are shown dotted.

As stated earlier, the result of the key overlap is to prevent a straight shear plane from passing through the panel. In addition, the plurality of staggered keys balances the applied load since when any two adjacent tabs are in tension, the adjacent tabs thereto are in compression.

A very satisfactory key, both for purposes of mechanical bonding and reinforcing, is one in which the sides 15 and 16 of the key 14 angle toward each other away from the metal face and terminate in a flange 17 to form a somewhat T-shaped section, see FIG. 2. As illustrated, the flanges 17 from the keys 14 of opposing faces 11 and 12 are in overlapping relationship. Mechanical bonding is further increased by punching a plurality of holes 18 in both the flange l7 and the area between the sides 15 and 16 of the keys 14. The cementatious core material 13 fills these holes 18 as it is poured into the space formed by the metal periphery, and after solidification, the mechanical bonding is substantially increased.

The voids 25 formed in the faces 11 and 12 by the pressing out of keys 14 can be used for connecting the panel 10 with joists or other structural members utilized to support it.

The metal faces of the panel are preferably made out of mild steel sheets having an ultimate strength in the range of 30,000 psi and having a thickness between 22 and 30 gauge, inclusive. This provides adequate strength for the panel and at the same time permits easy pressing out of the keys and forming for the panel sides.

The cementatious core material 13 is preferably somewhat cellular. This reduces the weight of the resistance and at the same time, minimizes the cost. Al'- though I prefer to keep the density of the cementatious core below 20 lbs./cu.ft., the density can go as high as S lbs./cu.ft. and still be reasonable in termsof overall panel weight. While more dense material such as concrete can be employed, I prefer the lighter cementartious materials, of which there are many, since all the desirable properties can be achieved by the use thereof. Generally speaking, the thickness of the composite panel will vary between one-half and 3 inches, depending upon the span and the load requirements of the panel.

The panels can be easily interlocked with each other along the panel sides with the space therebetween filled with a grout of the core material to present a uniform surface and an equal sound and fire rating, see FIG. 4. This can be accomplished by double bending the top metal face to form the side having an upwardly extending free end 21. An adjacent panel having a side 19 with a downwardly depending free end 22 is interlocked therewith and the space therebetween is filled with core material 23.

It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that within the framework of thefabove specification, the key depth and spacing, as well as the face gauges, core materials and densities may be varied to accommodate almost any load over any given span condition.

I claim: I

l. A composite load bearing panel comprising two thin metal faces having a cementatious core material therebetween, each metal face having a plurality of integ raljkey's positioned substantially 90 outward therefrom toextend into the core material to a depth of greater than 50 per cent of the core material thickness, the keys including a web portion extending from the metal face andterminating in a flange portion, at least one of the web portion and flange portion having a plurality of holes extending therethrough, said keys of one face being alternately spaced in relation to the keys of ,-.the other fa'c'eand being in overlapping relationship'so as to prevent failure by a straight shear plane, said'k'eys acting both as a mechanical bond between the faces and the core material and as reinforcement of the panel giving said pane] substantial strength in both tension and compression.

2. The panel of claim 1 wherein the webs of said keys of each sheet have sides which angle toward each other away from the metal face and terminate in the flange to define a substantially T-shaped key.

3. The panel of claim 1 wherein said keys of each face are positioned in rows crosswise of said face, the keys of a given row in each face being staggered in relation to the keys of an adjacent row, said rows of one face aligning with the rows of the other face in alternating key relationship.

4. The panel of claim 1 wherein each metal face extends outwardly at along at least one edge thereof to form pane] sides to encapsulate the cementatious core.

5. The panel of claim 4 wherein at least one side has a free end to accommodate a free end of an adjacent panel to form a space therebetween, said space being filled with grout.

6. The panel of claim lwherein the metal faces are mild steel sheets having a thickness between 22 and 30 gauge, inclusive.

7. The panel of claim 6 wherein the cementatious core material has a density less than 50 lbs./cu.ft. and preferably below 20 lbs./cu.ft.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US995069 *Jul 13, 1910Jun 13, 1911Henry L LewenReinforced concrete construction.
US1590650 *Jul 25, 1925Jun 29, 1926Schack CharlesAnchoring device for deck-coating material
US1837451 *Dec 19, 1930Dec 22, 1931Burgess Lab Inc C FPunch
US1956354 *Jul 15, 1930Apr 24, 1934Hugo JunkersStructural element
US1988613 *Mar 25, 1932Jan 22, 1935Braithwaite And Company EngineManufacture of roads, yards, aerodromes, and the like surfaces
US2023452 *Feb 6, 1933Dec 10, 1935American Brass CoWall construction
US2064910 *Sep 20, 1933Dec 22, 1936Harper Clarence SReenforced monolith building construction
US2091750 *Mar 2, 1936Aug 31, 1937Reynolds CorpComposite plank
US3264649 *Jul 16, 1962Aug 2, 1966Nicolet Ind IncInterlocking panels
US3518801 *Sep 30, 1968Jul 7, 1970Redey GeorgeAdjustable construction joint strips
FR1213564A * Title not available
GB957742A * Title not available
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1 *Text: International Congress on Lightweight Concrete, Vol. I, May 1968, pages 78, 194, William Clowes and Sons, Ltd., London Scientific Library Call No. TP884, L515, 1968.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4606156 *Aug 4, 1983Aug 19, 1986C-Tec, Inc.Access flooring panel
US4639204 *Jun 12, 1985Jan 27, 1987C-Tec, Inc.Apparatus for centrifugally casting concrete panels
US4719727 *Oct 4, 1985Jan 19, 1988C-Tec, Inc.Access floor panel
US4729859 *Sep 29, 1986Mar 8, 1988C-Tec, Inc.Method for casting concrete panels
US4945701 *May 16, 1989Aug 7, 1990Tate Access Floors, Inc.Composite concrete floor panel
US4967532 *Mar 7, 1990Nov 6, 1990Avco CorporationMeans for and method of making a cast structural fire proof panel assembly
US5031368 *Apr 29, 1988Jul 16, 1991Matthews Anthony WTiles for false floors
US5329741 *Mar 31, 1993Jul 19, 1994Raphael NicolaidisPortable constructional element and a process for its production
US5596860 *Sep 9, 1994Jan 28, 1997Insu-Form IncorporatedFoamed cement insulated metal frame building system
US5632126 *Mar 22, 1995May 27, 1997Agsten; Carl F.Wall system involving corrugated panels for making confinement cells
US6797219Nov 28, 2000Sep 28, 2004Steelcase Development CorporationMethod for manufacture of floor panels
EP0294265A1 *May 19, 1988Dec 7, 1988ELECTRICITE DE FRANCE Service NationalFireproof doors
EP1327732A1 *Dec 23, 2002Jul 16, 2003System AlbaneseEdge shuttering for concrete slabs
Classifications
U.S. Classification52/598, 52/599
International ClassificationE04C2/28, E04C2/26
Cooperative ClassificationE04C2/28
European ClassificationE04C2/28