|Publication number||US3769148 A|
|Publication date||Oct 30, 1973|
|Filing date||Oct 12, 1971|
|Priority date||Oct 12, 1970|
|Publication number||US 3769148 A, US 3769148A, US-A-3769148, US3769148 A, US3769148A|
|Original Assignee||Ici Ltd|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (7), Referenced by (4), Classifications (14)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
E1 ted States Patent [191 an'low FIBROUS SHEET MATERIALS AND FILTER ELEMENTS FORMED THEREFROM  Inventor: George Edwardfiarlow, Harrogate,
England  Assignee: Imperial Chemical Industries Limited, London, England  Filed: Oct. 12, 1971  Appl. No.: 188,463
 Foreign Appiication Priority Data Oct. 12, 1970 Great Britain 48,301/70  US. Cl. 161/123, 93/1 C, 131/10 R, 131/10 A, 156/166, 156/178, 156/201,
 Int. Cl A24d l/0 6, B32b 3/00, 1332b 3/30  Field of Search 161/121, 123, 128, 161/129, 132, 133, 134, 135,142, 143, 146,
198, 150, 173; 131/8, 9,10 A, 10 R, 261 B;
 References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,916,039 12/1959 Miiller 93/1 C 11 3,769,148 [4 1 Qct.3@,1973
Scott 161/129 3,501,369 3/1970 Drelich et al. 161/150 3,607,512 9/1971 Mathe 131/10 R 2,667,170 l/1954 Lebert 131/9 3,596,663 8/1971 Schultz et al. 131/10 A 3,490,461 l/1970 Osmalov et al. 131/9 Primary Examiner-George F. Lesmes Assistant Examiner-Paul J. Thibodeau Attorney-Cushman, Darby & Cushman [5 7] ABSTRACT 3 Claims, No Drawings FIBROUS SHEET MATERlALS AND FILTER ELEMENTS FORMED THEREFROM The present invention relates to fibrous sheet materials,'to filter elements formed from such fibrous sheet materials, and to a method for the production of such filter elements. Particularly, though not exclusively, the invention is concerned with filter elements for cigarettes and the like.
It is known to produce cigarette filter elements from creped or corrugated absorbent paper which is compressed into the desired shape by passage through a tubular die. Filter elements produced in this manner using so-called Myria paper are described in UK. Patent Specifications 790,694 and 796,679. Furthermore, it is known to produce cigarette filter elements by contacting absorbent cellulose fibres with a corrugated paper, see for example, U.K. Patent Specification 639,919.
A deficiency of such filters is that they have an insufficient wet hardness, that is they become soft when moistened; this interferes with the performance of the filters.
According to the present invention, a fibrous sheet.
material comprises an absorbent, paper-like cellulose wadding in sheet form having an array of substantially aligned fibres bonded thereto on one side thereof.
Preferably, the fibrous sheet material is creped or corrugated having grooves running longitudinally thereof. I
Also according to the present invention, a fibrous sheet material comprises an absorbent, paper-like cellulose wadding in sheet form, which is uncalendered or has been only slightly calendered, having substantially parallel corrugations therein and extending longitudinally thereof, and an array of fibres bonded to one side of the paper-like cellulose wadding, the fibres extending in the direction of the corrugations and occupying at least some of the grooves formed thereby. Preferably, all the grooves are occupied by some of the fibres.
The invention further includes a rod-like filter element formed from fibrous sheet materials according to the invention. i
Desirably, the absorbent, paper-like cellulose waddings used in the present invention exhibit the following properties:
i. Air permeability (ccsJcm lsec. water) 100 ii. Bulk )ccs/gm) 4 iii. Substance (gms/metre*) iv. Ratio ClB l7 where C Compressibility (percent retained thickness, 135 gms. to '850 gms.)
B Bulk (cos/gm) v. Product of Air Permeability and Compressibility 500.
The properties serve to define cellulose waddings which used in the form of filter elements, especially for cigarettes, possess the optimum filtration efficiencies over the practical range of filter deniers.
The fibrous sheet materials of the invention are preferably made by contacting one side of an absorbent, paper-like cellulose wadding in sheet form with an array of substantially aligned fibres and subjecting the assembly to a bonding treatment whereby the fibres are bonded to the cellulose wadding. Continuously thereat 1 cm. head of with or subsequently thereafter, the fibrous sheet material is formed into a rod-like filter element by compressing the fibrous sheet material during its passage through one or more suitably shaped dies or formers. The rod-like filter element is then subjected to a bonding treatment to provide additional bonding between the fibres and the cellulose wadding. If the bonding treatment is a heat treatment, then the die(s) or former(s) may be heated to effect the bonding during formations of the filter element. Preferably, the fibrous sheet material is corrugated before its passage through the die(s). This may be achieved, forexample, by corrugating or creping the cellulose wadding before the application of the fibres thereto or by corrugating the fibrous sheet materiali.e., the cellulose wadding/fibre assembly.
The fibrous sheet material is preferably formed into a rod-shaped filter element by feeding it into a conventional Molins rod making (cigarettefilter) machine which compressed the fibrous sheet material into a cylindrical rod-shaped filter element of the required size. A wrapping paper may'be fed into the machine as in conventional processes to maintain'the shape of the filter element. The bonding treatment applied to the filter element improves the wet hardness of the filter element.
Desirably, the fibrous sheet materials and the filter elements made therefrom contain from 15 percent to 55 percent by weight of the fibres. A typical composition is 30 percent by weight of fibre and 70 percent by weight of cellulose wadding. Preferably, the fibres used in the invention are heat bondable fibres which are bonded to the cellulose wadding by heat treatments.
The heat bondable fibres may be staple fibres or continuous filaments and are rendered bondable at temperatures which have no deleterious effects on the cellulose waddings. Desirable fibres are those which comprise two or more components wherein at least one is a heat bondable component. Examples of such fibres are sheath/core conjugate fibres and side-by-side conjugate fibers. The preferred fibres are synthetic polymeric fibres which are undrawn and are essentially uncrimped. A typically desirable fibre array is composed of side-by-side, continuous conjugate filaments comprising percent by weight of polypropylene and 50 percent by weight of polyethylene.
ther alone or in combination'with a heat treatment is envisaged.
The filter elements of the present invention are particularly suitable for cigarette filters. They have the advantages of increased wet hardness", particularly useful for so-called wet smokers, desirable pressure drop i.e., readily allowing smoke tobe drawn through, and high filtration efficiency. Although the filter elements of the invention are primarily designed for use as monofilters in view of their reduced cost, they may be used in conjunction with other filters in so-called duofilter systems.
Examples of filter elements made according to the present invention and their properties are listed in Table I. The fibres used in each case consisted of sideby-side conjugate continuous filaments of 50 percent by weight polypropylene and of 50 percent by weight polyethylene. D/C denotes drawn and crimped filaments, and S denotes spun filaments i.e., undrawn and essentially uncrimped. A pressure drop of less than about 8 cms of water is required for a cigarette filter element to allow the smoker to draw easily on the cigarette. The filter elements of the invention given in Table I fit this requirement and also have a satisfactory high filtration efficiency.
Table II shows the pressure drop and filtration efficiency properties of three commercially available cigarette filter elements. A comparison with the monofilters in Table I shows that the examples of the invention have much higher filtration efficiencies than the monofilters of Table II and have filtration efficiencies substantially the same as that of the more expensive duo filter.
Table III shows that the Myria paper filter element has low wet hardness and that the cellulose acetate and the Myria" paper/cellulose acetate duo-filter element have much higher values for wet hardness. The filter element made from 100 percent British Tissues cellulose wadding also has poor wet hardness. However, the examples of the invention in Table III have reasonably high wet hardness values.
The results given in Tables I, II and III are in respect of filters having lengths of l 5 mm. and diameters 7.6 to
rod-like filter element at 8 mm diameter is given by the expression Denier 8 /(Rod diameter) The rod diameter was measured using a Molins gauge.
6. The hardness of the rod-like filter element is expressed as percent Height retained Mercer gauge reading (mrn X l00/lnitial Diameter (mm) The sample was subjected to a load of 300 grns in a Mercer thickness gauge and after 15 seconds the diameter was noted.
7. The air permeability of wadding samples were measured using a Shirley Air Permeability apparatus in a standard atmosphere of relative humidity 65 i 2 percent and a temperature of 20 2C.
8. The filtration efficiency of a rod-like filter element for a cigarette was measured on a standard "cigarettesmoking machine having a puff volume of 25 ml, a puff" duration of 2 seconds and a puf frequency of one per minute. A cigarette (Players Medium) was lit at the first puff and the machine was run for 10 cycles. The cigarette smoke was drawn through a filter train (the machine drawing 25 i 0.5 ml of air per cycle) comprising the filter rod of the invention and a glass fibre filter/screw top/and ring assembly.
'The filtration efficiency is calculated by the expressi n. 7
Weight of dry tar collected by filter rod Weight of dry tar on glass fiber filter/screw top/ring assembly 8 mm. X 100 TABLE I Pressure Weight of paperdrop Filtration like material (g./ Percent Type gff Composite (cms. efficiency Type of paper-like material Supplier sq. meter) fiber fiber denier water) (percent) Single-ply bleached dry crepe cellulose wad- British Tissues 17 40 DIC 77,000 4.58 43.7
ding (uncalendered). Limited.
Do... I7 30 D/C 82,500 6.55 49.3 Do... 17 20 D/C 77.400 6.16 48.4 Do 17 30 S 8l.400 5.64 47 TEST PROCEDURES TABLE rr 1. Bulk was measured in accordance with British Pressure Filtration Standard Specification 3983/1966. C f d H n I p (cn lsl efficiencty 2. Substance was measured by weighing 10 cm X 10 omposmon o m e 6 ement wa er) (percen) cm square samples and converting to gms/metre by "Myria" paper (monofilter) 1.7 26 calulatiom 5o Cellulose acetate (monofilter) 6.0 30
Myria paper/cellulose acetate (duo- 3. Compressrbrlrty was tested by taking an additional filt 49 thickness measurement according to'the procedure in British Standard Specification 3983/ 1966 but using a load of 135 gms instead of 850 gms. It was then ex- TABLE 1 pressed as Percentage retained thickness by calculating as follows Dry Composition of rod-like filter hardness hardness Thickness under 850 grns load/Th ckness under 135 a Denier (percent) (P gms load X 100 I u n 0 90 Pressm drop is measured by mwmingthe sample ciliulis i iieix::::::::11331133311: 5.32308. 5312 %3:7 in a holder connected to a supply of compressed air (8 M -ta" paper/cellulose acetate pounds/inch). The rate of the air flow is monitored gj f i g j l 694300 v 0 l usmg a flow meter and the rate rs ad usted to be 17.5 wadding 781,00 833 402 ccs/second. The pressure drop across the sample to 30%bywgt.bondedfibers,70%by w wgt. British Tissues cellulose marntam this flo rate is measured rn centimetres of wadding before heat treatment. 82.500 812 50.7 Waiei- 00.. qfzer heat treatment 82.500 87.2 59.9
5. Demer of rod-like filter element rs given by the ex- 20% by wgt. bonded fibers, by
wgt. British Tissues cellulose pressron. 77,400 84.3 56.4-
weight of 15 mm sample (grns) X 600,000. Denier of wadding after heat treatment.....
What we claim is: 1. A fibrous sheet material comprising 85 percent to 45 percent by weight of an absorbent, paper-like cellulosic wadding having substantially parallel corrugations therein and extending continuously longitudinally thereof, said wadding exhibiting the following physical properties throughout its structure:
i. Air permeability 100 ii. Substance iii. compressibility/Bulk 17 iv. Air permeability Compressibility 500 and 15 percent to 55 percent by weight of an array of fibres extending in the direction of the corrugations at least one heat bondable component.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US1141495 *||Nov 28, 1910||Jun 1, 1915||Arthur H Scott||Paper towel.|
|US2667170 *||Apr 1, 1950||Jan 26, 1954||Lebert Herbert A||Crimped wrapper for cigarettes|
|US2916039 *||Jan 22, 1957||Dec 8, 1959||Adolf Muller Paul||Filter for tobacco smoke|
|US3490461 *||Apr 20, 1967||Jan 20, 1970||Philip Morris Inc||Cigarette ventilation|
|US3501369 *||Nov 17, 1965||Mar 17, 1970||Johnson & Johnson||Nonwoven fabric and method of making the same|
|US3596663 *||May 29, 1969||Aug 3, 1971||Lorillard Co P||Ventilated smoking article|
|US3607512 *||Jan 3, 1969||Sep 21, 1971||Philip Morris Inc||Extruding tow filled mouthpiece rod having serrated inner surfaces clenching the tow|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4546040 *||Jun 11, 1984||Oct 8, 1985||Vyskummy ustav chemickych claken||Cigarette filter and method of manufacture|
|US6103061 *||Jul 7, 1998||Aug 15, 2000||Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc.||Soft, strong hydraulically entangled nonwoven composite material and method for making the same|
|EP0147216A2 *||Dec 21, 1984||Jul 3, 1985||Fabriques De Tabac Reunies S.A.||Method of re-using waste fibres|
|EP0147216A3 *||Dec 21, 1984||Jun 3, 1987||Fabriques De Tabac Reunies S.A.||Method of re-using waste fibres|
|U.S. Classification||428/182, 156/166, 428/400, 131/332, 156/178, 156/201, 131/341, 493/50, 131/343, 156/221|
|International Classification||A24D3/10, A24D3/00|