|Publication number||US3775078 A|
|Publication date||Nov 27, 1973|
|Filing date||May 22, 1972|
|Priority date||May 22, 1972|
|Publication number||US 3775078 A, US 3775078A, US-A-3775078, US3775078 A, US3775078A|
|Inventors||T Elmer, H Meissner|
|Original Assignee||Corning Glass Works|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (21), Classifications (27)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Elmer et al.
United States Patent 91 PROCESS FOR MAKING CARBON-CONTAINING CERAMICS  Inventors: Thomas H. Elmer, Corning;
Helmuth E. Meissner, Painted Post both of NY.
 Assignee: Corning Glass Works, Corning,
 Filed: May 22, 1972 211 Appl. No.: 255,845
 US. Cl. 65/32, 65/31, 117/46 CB,
' 117/46 CC  Int. Cl. C03c 21/00  Field of Search", 65/31, 32;
117/46 CB, 46 CC [5 6] References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,102,047
8/1963 Rivington 117/46 CC Q Nov. 27, 1973 3/1943 Hood et al. 65/31 Primary Examiner-Arthur D. Kellogg Attorney-Clarence R. Patty, Jr. et a1.
[57 ABSTRACT A process for carbon-impregnating a refractory porous article,particularly a porous glass article, comprising the steps of impregnating the porous article with a polymerizable furan derivative, polymerizing the furan derivative in situ in the article to form a resin, and firing the article in a nonoxidizing atmosphere to a temperature at least sufficient to convert the resin to carbon, is disclosed. The resulting article has useful thermal and electrical properties.
- 4 Claims, 2 Drawing Figures ANNEALING POINTS OF POROUS GLASSES lMPREGNATlNG SOLUTION VOLUME FURFURYL ALCOHOL 7 o d J l 1 I050; w 1 I 1 LL! 2 Z I000 0. S v i PATENTEDNDVUIQH I 3 8 sum 10F 2 ANNEALING POINTS 'OF POROUS GLASSES MIMPREGNATING SOLUTION- v VOLUME FURFURYL ALCOHOL PMENIEUunmms I SHEEI 20F 2 VISCOSITY CURVES OF POROUS GLASSES mm m Glmi. D
A m 0 6, l O 2 M Y B mm 8 6 4 2 D8 6 4 TEMPERATURE- c Fig. 2
PROCESS FOR'MAKING CARBON-CONTAINING CERAMICS BACKGROUND THE INVENTION The present processrelates generally to the production of carbon-containing ceramic articles and particularly to the manufacture of carbon-containing porous glasses.
Processes for carbon-impregnating glasses in order to impart electrical conductivity thereto are known. US.
Pat. No. 2,556,6l6,'for example, describes a process glasses. There are, however, numerous disadvantages associated with the use of sugar solutions :to' impregnate glasses, particularly when concentrated: solutions arerequired. Concentrated solutions have rather highviscosity and must be heated to lower viscosity if complete.
impregnation of porous glasses is: to be achieved. The
hot concentrated solutions theni tend to caramelize readily to produce highly viscous solutions'which can no longer permeate porous articles. v Sugar solutions are also subject "to fermentation if al= lowed to stand in air, requiring the use of stabilizingadditives to obtain useful pot life. In addition, decomposition of sugar does not take placeat temperatures below about 100 C, so that migration of the sugar solution from the center of an impregnated article towards its external surface may occur on drying. Thismay result in a depletion of sugartand carbon) from the centersof a thick-walled structure, depriving itofthe useful ef-- fects of the carbon phase. And finally, sugar'contains large numbers of hydroxyl groups which can cause autooxidation of the carbon chains in the sugar and, hence, loss of some of the desired carbon from the glass Most of the other-organic materials which-have been considered for the purpose of impregnating-porous ceramics also have disadvantages- A suitablepyrolyzable organic compound must be liquid or liquid-soluble, treatable to cause decompositionin situ without exces sive' evaporation or excessive release of thermal energy, and capable of producing large quantities ofcarbon decomposition products .within the pore structure of the material upon suitable treatment of' the refractory body. No organic impregnants yet proposed for this purpose have provided'all of these features incombination with a reasonable degree of process convenience.
It is therefore, one object of the present invention to provide a process for carbon-impregnatingporous glass and other refractory porous materials which provides advantages in material handlingand-impregnation efficiency not obtainable using 7 sugar-impregnation or other prior art techniques.
It is further object of this invention to provide a process which produces carbon-impregnated glasses having improved thermal properties in comparison with materials produced using prior art processes.
Other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed examples thereof, and from the appended DRAWING wherein FIG. 1 shows the effect of the process of the present invention on the annealing point of a porous glass, and FIG. 2 compares the viscosity-temperature curve of a carbon-impregnated glass produced according to the present invention with the viscosity-temperature .curve ofa carbonglass produced according to a prior art process.
SUMMARY OF THE. INVENTION Briefly, our invention includes a process for carbonimpregnating a refractory porous article which comprises the steps of impregnatingthe pore structure of a porous article with a polymerizable furan derivative suchas furfuryl alcohol, furfural, or furfuramide, polymerizingthe furan derivative in situ inthe porous article to form a resin, and firing the article in a nonoxidizing atmosphere to a temperature atleast sufficient to convert the resin to carbon. For the purposes of ourprocess, the refractory porous article maybe a porous glass article a continuously-porous refractory ceramic material suchas silica, alumina or zirconia, or a continuouslyporous refractory foam;
2O P'olymerizable furan derivatives which are employed in our process are typically 2- substituted derivatives, including furfuryl alcohol, furfuramide and furfural. These may be polymerized in situ in the glass to form a; black, infusible, and non-volatile resin through condensation reactions induced, forexample, by heating, adding a catalytic amount of acid or acidic salts as dehydratingsand/or polymerizing agents, or exposing to intensive light; Following'condensation of :the selected furan derivative to a resin, conversion of the resin to carbon may be accomplished by firing in a nonoxidizing atmosphere.
Carbon is an excellent drying agent, particularly for porous glass, effectively removing hydroxyl groups which, if leftin the structure, soften the glass. For this purpose, relatively small amounts of furan derivatives are required to produce high-annealing-point glasses; however, higher concentrations of furan derivatives are useful to provide sufficient carbon to make the glass electrically conductive.
The selected furan derivatives may be employed either alone or in combination with other organic or inorganic diluents or solvents. They offer significant advantages over other impregnants, including. low viscosity in pure or dissolved format roomtemperature, and low cost. Also, noextemalcatalyst is required for resinification, and, in the case of'furfuryl alcoholand furfural, water may. be used as a'diluent'. Examples of other diluents which may suitably be employedare aromatic phenols such as phenol and beta-napthol, and aromatic amines. such as aniline, alpha-naphthylamine and ptoluidine.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 of the drawing demonstrates the effect of a furfurylalcoholimpregnant on the annealing point of a porous 96 percent silica glass treatediaccording to the process of the present invention. The points plotted are the measured annealing points (10 poises viscosity) of consolidated, carbon-containing glass strips which were impregnated as porous glasses with water, furfuryl alcohol or mixtures thereof, dried, and fired according to the invention. The various mixtures are shown on the horizontal axis of the diagram. The marked effect of the process of the invention on the annealing points of the treated glasses is evident; even minor amounts of impregnant significantly increase the annealing point of the glass.
FIG. 2 ,of the drawing consists of a plot of viscosity in poises versus temperature in degrees centigrade for two carbon-containing glasses, one produced according to the process of the present invention and 'oneproduced according to a wellknown prior art process. The higher viscosity of the glass produced according to the process of the present invention is evident; this viscosity-temperature relationship makes the carboncontaining glasses of the present invention eminently suitable for use in high temperature applications.
DESCRlPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The process of the present invention has particular utility in the treatment of porous glasses to increase the annealing point thereof. Examples of such glasses include high-silica porous glasses such as the so-called 96 percent silica glasses which are used in high temperature and thermal-cycling applications because of their high annealing point and low thermal expansion. The manufacture'of such glasses is described in detail in US. Pat. No. 2,106,744 to Hood et al., generally involving the heat treatment of certain phase-separable alkali-borosilicate glasses to form an alkaliand boronrich phase and a silica-rich phase, and the subsequent acid-leaching of the phase-separated glass to remove thealkaliand boron-rich phase. The resulting glass articles-which typically comprise at least 94 percent silica by weight and have a multiplicity of interconnecting, submicroscopic pores resulting from the removal of the soluble phase, may be used as porous glasses or, optionally, consolidated to transparent, non-porous glass articles by appropriate heat treatment.
Glasses prepared by the method of the aforementioned Hoodet al patent are known in the art by the general designation 96 percent silica glasses, without particular regard for the exact silica content thereof, and this general designation is used herein with that meaning. Thus it will be understood that the term porous 96 percent silica glass as it appears herein is used in the generic sense to include all porous alkaliborosilicate glasses produced from alkali-borosilicate glasses in accordance with the. above-described method, irrespective of the exact silica content of the glass.
The furan derivative which is preferred for use in the process of the present invention is furfuryl alcohol. This compound is not only miscible with water in all proportions, but it can be readily polymerized in situ in a porous glass or other ceramic" body to a nonvolatile resin by heating. In addition, relatively low concentrations of furfuryl alcohol are sufficient to substantially improve the high temperature characteristics of the final glasses, and while higher concentrations do not further increase'the annealing point of the glass, they do produce electrically conductive glasses.
We have found that the stability of aqueous furfuryl alcohol solutions is a function of furfuryl alcohol content, and that, particularly with solutions under about 70 percent alcohol by volume separation into an alcohol-rich and an alcohol-poor phasecan occur on standing for long periods of time. This can readily be avoided by making the solutions slightly basic, as by adding a minor amount of ammonium hydroxide, and such an addition does not interfere with the beneficial effects of the furfuryl alcohol impregnant on the properties of the resulting carbon-glasses.
impregnation of the selected refractory porous article with afuran derivative is typically accomplished by immersion of-the porous article intothe furan derivative, or into a furan derivative-containing solution or mixture, for a period of time at least sufiicient to insure thorough penetration by the impregnant into the pore structure of the material. Immersion treatments may range from several minutes to several days, depending on the porosity, pore size, pore configuration, thickness, and degree of dryness of the refractory porous article. In the case of a water-soaked article, for example, longer immersion times will be required to achieve concentration equilibrium with the impregnating solution than in the case of a dry article. Thus, drying of the glass prior to impregnation may in'some instances be desirable.
Following immersion, the surfaces of the impregnated article are typically rinsed and freed of excess solution, and then the article is subjected to treatment to cause the polymerization of the furan derivative to a non-volatile resin in situ in the pores of the article. For this purpose, we prefer a treatmentcomprising gradual heating to a temperature at least sufiicient to promote condensation and polymerization of the furan derivative. Temperature in excess of about 180 C are seldom required to achieve a useful degree of polymerization.
Gradual heating during this stage is preferred because it allows time for theescape of water and condensation by-products of the furan polymerization process from the pore structure of the material. Excessively rapid heating rates result in pressure within the article due to trapped vapors, and the resulting stresses can cause breakage; thus the rate of heating to the condensation temperature should be below that which will cause breakage of the article.
Once the furan derivative has been converted into a non-volatile resin, firing in a non-oxidizing atmosphere is undertaken to decompose the resin to carbon. Preferably, the early stages of the decomposition process are carried out in a reducing atmosphere to minimize carbon oxidation. This may be accomplished, for example, by heating in flowing forming gas; Also, theinitial heating rate should be quite low to permit the escape of water and other decomposition products and to control the rate of shrinkage of the decomposing resin. Excessively rapid shrinkage of the carbon phase can cause stresses which can break the article.
At temperatures above about 800 C the use of a reducing atmosphere is of lesser importance and a vacuum or an inert or non-oxidizing atmosphere such as nitrogen may instead be employed. Also, at temperatures above about 450 C, increased heating rates may be used, since most of the volatile decomposition byproducts have by then been driven off, .and since stresses resulting from shrinkage of the resin are partly relieved by the concurrent shrinkage of the porous article.
Firing to temperatures of at least about l,200 C is preferred to insure complete decomposition of the impregnant to carbon and, in the case of a porous glass, to allow the glass and porous carbon to consolidate to a dense, glassy, composite material. High-temperature soaking at these temperatures for periods of at least about one-half hour are useful in achieving this result. Even in the case of porous ceramic structures which are not to be consolidated by heating, firing tempera tures of at least about 1,200 C in an inert atmosphere being continued for about hours at bon, any. articles which remain porousshould be gradually cooled in nitrogen toat leastabout400 C priorto removal from the furnace to prevent oxidation of the carbon. On the other'hand, the cooling of "a consoli-' dated carbon glass is limitedonly by its thermal shock resistance, since an impervious glassy layer protects the carbon from: oxidation. Thus, consolidated carbon- .6 pregnating furfuryl alcoholsolutions, are set forth in Table I below, and are also presented graphically in glasses may safely be employed-at elevated temperatures evenunder'oxidizing conditions. Y
The-following example illustrates 'in 'detail aprocedure for using furfuryl alcohol inthe process of the present invention.. a
centimeter X 1.6,nii1limeters in size, were cut frompo rous glass tubing. The tubing had been washed in -l N have been present in-the pores of the'glass, and to reduce any residual acid remaining in the glass from theleaching processwhich could induce non-uniform poly-- .meriz ation of the furfuryl alcohol and thus non-uniform impregnation of the glass. The tubing was composed of 1 a glass which consisted of at least about98 percent 'silica byweight, about eight parts per million NagOona' dry basis, and les's than 2..perce'nt by weight B50 hav- 'ing an average pore size of about Aand surface are of about 240 square meters pergram.
20. l-lNO and rinsed in distilled water at 95 C to remove any. soluble contaminants, such as alkali, which might.
; Thestrips of porous glass were oven-driediin air and.
theneachwas immersed'in a differentimpregnating solution, composed of pure furfuryl alcohol, pure distilled water, or mixtures thereof; withthe immersion'process room temperature to assure thorough impregnation.
, Theimpregnatedstrips were then removed from the impregnating solution,,rinsed in distilled water (5"sec-:
onds) wiped, placed in an oven at C and gradually heatedfover aperiod of about 7 hoursto 150 Cin' air.
Upon cooling and removal from'the oven,.all but the distilled water-impregnated sample were. black as the result of the polymerization of the. furfuryl alcoholin the glass to a black, non-volatile resin.
Following the above heating process, the eleven samples were placed in 42 millimeter I.D. VYCOR brand glass tubes and fired in an electric furnace to convert? the resin to'carbon. This process comprised'firing initially informing gas (92 percent N 8 percent H, by volume) flowing throughthe tubes at a rate of about 80 cc. per minute while heating at a rateof about 21 C per hour from about 100 C toia temperature in the range from about 500550 C, andfurther heating atarate of about 100 C per hourtoa temperature in the range from about 850900 C. Thereafter, the samples n were further heated at a rate of about 100 C per hour,
FIG'. I of the drawing. The data show-thatthe annealing point of the porous. high-silica glass may be increased fromabout 1,02 3 C to about l,l35. C', with only a small concentration offurfuryl alcohol needed to bring about a greaterthan-IOO C increase in: the annealing point. FIG. I of thedrawing shows that the annealing point curve remains essentially flat over the concentra-. 5 tion range of about 10 to 100 volume percent furfuryl alcohol; indicatingthat incorporation of additional carbon in the glass does-not improve theannealing point. The average annealing} point of the samples,excluding Sample 1 whichwas' treated only with distilled water, was -l,135C. H j TABLE I,. ANNEALING POINTS OF TREATED GLASSES Annealing Point Sample No. Volume of Furfuryl Alcohol I (10 poises) 1 I 1 0 1023C 2 10; [138C 3 20 1134C 4 30 Notmeasureti 5 "40 38C 6 50 1129'C 7 6O -l 138C 8 33C 9 v 37C 10 Not measured 11 In thetfollowing'example, the viscosity-temperature, characteristics of-a carbon-impregnated glassprepared according to the process of the. present invention are compared with the viscosity-temperature characteristics of a .carbon impregnated glassprepared according to a priorart-process.
EXAMPLE t Two identical, strips ofporous glasstubing havingthe composition o'fthestrips described in Example I were washed; rinsed, and'driedas describedin Example I.
One strip was then immersed in a solution composed of 5 0. millilitersof distilled water and 50 grams of sucrose, while the other strip wasimmersed in asolution composed of 50 millilitersof; distilled water and 50 milliliters OfflllftltYlfilCOhOLjBCth' strips'rernained in their respective solutions for 16 hours at room temperature to insure thoroughimpregnation ofjthe pore structure of the glass.
After immersion, the strips. were removed from the solutions, rinsed in distilled water (5 seconds), wiped, and then graduallyheatedin an'oven from 50 to C to removemoisture and polymerize the furfuryl alcohol.
Following this heatingprocess, the strips were fired according to the procedure described in Examples 1.
The firingprocess comprised heating initially in forming gas-flowing over the strips at about 80 cc. per minute, raising the temperature at a rate of about 21 C per hour from about 130 C to about 440 C, and at a rate of. about C per hour from 440 C to about 770 C. Thereafter, the strips were further heated at a rate of about 100 C per hour, in nitrogen flowing over the strips at about 28 cc per minute, raising the temperature from about 770C to about 1,230" and maintaining at that temperature for about one-half hour. -Finally, the strips were gradually cooled to room temperature in nitrogen and removed from the furnace.
: material as well as the thickness of the article.
= 7 I The viscosity-temperature curves of the. carboncOntaining strips produced as described were then determined on a beam bending viscosity measuring apparatus with the results shown in FIG. 2of the drawing. The curve denominated A is the curve obtained from the furfuryl alcohol-impregnated carbon-glass, and the prepared according to the prior art, having a higher viscosity (vertical axis) at each temperature (horizontal axis) in the entire range from about l,0201,160 C.
Other examples of carbon-impregnated articles prepared according to the process of the present invention include carbon glasses prepared with mixtures of furfural and phenol, as well as carbon glasses prepared with mixtures of furfural and aniline. The procedures employed in the preparation of these glasses were similar to the procedure outlined in Example'l above. Typically, the annealing point of these glasses ranged from about l,l30l,l35 C. Also, carbon glasses with log DC [resistivities as low as 1' ohm-centimeter have been prepared using pure furfuryl alcohol as the impregnant.
We have found that the desirable thermal and electrical properties typical of our glasses may be obtained over a wide range of varying process conditions. Hence, while wetypically employ impregnation treatments of about 16-24 hours for porous glasses, treatments may usefully range from as long as desired to as short as is required to achieve some impregnation of the porous refractory material. This will, of course, depend on the extent and nature of the porosity of the Similarly, the rate of heating the impregnated refractory porous structure and heating temperature employed to achieve condensation and polymerization of the furan derivative is not critical. Heating rates of up to about 200 C per hour can be employed if desired, and in the case of certain porous glasses, minor amounts of boric acid present in the glass or traces of dilute nitric acid remaining from leaching processes can cause complete resinification of furfuryl alcohol at temperatures as low as about 150 C, with the resulting polymer being highly cross-linkecl with up to four linkage points per monomeric unit. v
The pyrolysis of the furfuryl alcohol resin yields H O, C0, C0,, CH H and carbon as the principal products of pyrolysis, "with a cokereside comprising about 60 percent by weight of the resin remaining after heating to' l,000 C. This resin undergoes a linear'shrinkage of 20 percent corresponding to aflvolume shrinkage of about 50 percent, withthe maximum rate of shrinkage occurring at around 500 C and essentially complete shrinkage at 1,000- 1,200 C. The end product'of the pyrolysis is a nonporous, isotropic, 'glasslike carbon having a density of about 1.5 gramsper cc.
From the foregoing description and examples, it is apparentthat the process of the present invention provides a useful means for producing carbon-containing refractory articles offering improved thermal and electrical properties for many applications, and that the process disclosed offers advantages of both reproducibility and convenience over carbon-impregnation methods known in the prior art.
-l. A process for manufacturing a carbonimpregnated glass article having an annealing point (10 poise viscosity) of at least about 1,1 30 C. which comprises the steps of:
' a. impregnating a porous 96 percent silica glass article with a polymerizable furan derivative;
b. polymerizing the furan derivative .in situ in the glass article to form a resin; and
c. firing the glass article in a non-oxidizing atmosphere to a temperature of at leastabout l,200 C. to convert said resin to carbon.
2. A process according to claim 1 wherein the polymerizable furan derivative is selected from the group consisting of furfuryl alcohol, furfural, and furfuramide.
3. A process according to claim 2 wherein the step of polymerizing the furan derivative in situ in the glass article comprises heating the glass article to a temperature at least sufficient to promote condensation and polymerization of said furan derivative.
4. A process according to claim 3 wherein the step of firing the glass article in a non-oxidizing atmosphere comprises heating the glass article in a reducing atmosphere to a temperature of at least about 800 C.
' I I I h
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2315329 *||Apr 25, 1940||Mar 30, 1943||Corning Glass Works||Method of making composite glass articles|
|US3102047 *||Jun 16, 1959||Aug 27, 1963||Gen Electric Co Ltd||Processes for production of low permeability carbon|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3901752 *||Mar 8, 1973||Aug 26, 1975||Owens Illinois Inc||Laminating process utilizing mixtures of pyrolyzable and polymerizable binders|
|US3930821 *||Jan 27, 1975||Jan 6, 1976||Corning Glass Works||Process for making carbon-containing glass resistors|
|US3930822 *||Jan 27, 1975||Jan 6, 1976||Corning Glass Works||Process for making carbon-containing glass resistors|
|US3940509 *||Dec 19, 1973||Feb 24, 1976||Universal Oil Products Company||Semi-conducting materials and a method for the manufacture thereof|
|US4116657 *||May 5, 1977||Sep 26, 1978||Corning Glass Works||Process for increasing the annealing point of 96% silica glass|
|US4180723 *||Mar 28, 1977||Dec 25, 1979||Corning Glass Works||Electrical contacts for electrically conductive carbon glasses|
|US4704342 *||Apr 2, 1985||Nov 3, 1987||Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation||Photomask having a patterned carbon light-blocking coating|
|US4772305 *||Jun 30, 1986||Sep 20, 1988||Corning Glass Works||Process for dewatering porous glass|
|US5451444 *||Jan 29, 1993||Sep 19, 1995||Deliso; Evelyn M.||Carbon-coated inorganic substrates|
|US5597617 *||May 25, 1995||Jan 28, 1997||Corning Incorporated||Carbon-coated inorganic substrates|
|US5912048 *||Aug 25, 1997||Jun 15, 1999||Air Products And Chemicals, Inc.||Passivation carbonaceous adsorptive membranes|
|US6534677||Jun 4, 2001||Mar 18, 2003||Engelhard Corporation||Non-crushable, non-friable, non-breakable carbon catalyst supports|
|US6706658||Dec 21, 2001||Mar 16, 2004||Engelhard Corporation||Catalyst for purification of aromatic acids|
|US6992037||Sep 17, 2001||Jan 31, 2006||Engelhard Corporation||Precious metal catalyst for debenzylation|
|US7371425 *||Sep 10, 2004||May 13, 2008||Cinvention Ag||Method for coating substrates with a carbon-based material|
|US7586002||Feb 4, 2004||Sep 8, 2009||Basf Catalysts Llc||Catalyst for purification of aromatic acids|
|US7659225||Feb 9, 2010||Basf Catalysts Llc||Precious metal catalyst for debenzylation|
|US20040158086 *||Feb 4, 2004||Aug 12, 2004||White James Ferguson||Catalyst for purification of aromatic acids|
|US20050079356 *||Sep 10, 2004||Apr 14, 2005||Jorg Rathenow||Method for coating substrates with a carbon-based material|
|US20050221976 *||Jun 3, 2005||Oct 6, 2005||Chen Jian P||Precious metal catalyst for debenzylation|
|US20080118649 *||Dec 21, 2007||May 22, 2008||Jorg Rathenow||Method for coating substrates with a carbon-based material|
|U.S. Classification||65/32.4, 65/31, 427/224, 338/334, 219/547|
|International Classification||H01B1/14, C03C17/22, C04B41/50, H01B1/18, C04B41/85, C03C23/00, C04B41/45|
|Cooperative Classification||C04B41/5001, C04B41/009, C03C2218/32, C03C23/0095, C03C17/22, C03C2218/11, C03C2217/282, H01B1/18, C04B41/85|
|European Classification||C04B41/00V, C03C17/22, H01B1/18, C03C23/00S, C04B41/85, C04B41/50B|