|Publication number||US3775286 A|
|Publication date||Nov 27, 1973|
|Filing date||Sep 7, 1971|
|Priority date||May 18, 1970|
|Also published as||CA965767A, CA965767A1|
|Publication number||US 3775286 A, US 3775286A, US-A-3775286, US3775286 A, US3775286A|
|Inventors||D Mukherjee, P Chowdhury, J Sama, A Basu, N Basak, A Lahiri|
|Original Assignee||Council Scient Ind Res|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (26), Classifications (7)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
United States Patent [191 Mukherjee' et a].
[ NOV. 27, 1973 HYDROGENATION OF COAL  Inventors: Dilip Kumar Mukherjee; Priya Bandhu Chowdhury; Jugal Kishore Sama; Amarendra Nath Basu; Nitya Gopal Basak; Adinath Lahiri, all of Bihar, India  Assignee: Council of Scientific Industrial Research, New Delhi, India  Filed: Sept. 7, 1971  Appl. No.: 178,482
 US. Cl. 208/10  Int. Cl C10g 1/06  Field of Search 208/9, 10
 References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,502,564 3/1970 Hodgson 208/9 1,946,341 2/1934 Szeszich 208/l0 Primary Examiner-Delbert E. Gantz Assistant Examiner-James W. Hellwege Attorney-Carlton Hill et al.
 ABSTRACT 11 Claims, No Drawings HYDROGENATKON F COAL This invention relates to the hydrogenation of coal. It is well-known that hydrogenation of coal can be carried out with iron catalysts besides many others requiring costlier elements. Iron catalysts for this process have been used in the form of powdered oxide prepared from its compounds, or as iron ore, or obtained as industrial wastes or by-products like red mud from aluminium industry.
In an alternative practice, powdered coal can be impregnated with iron salts like ferrous sulphate from their solution in water. Such impregnated iron salts have also been used along with powdered oxide with or without the addition of sodium sulphide or elemental sulphur.
1 For liquid phase hydrogenation of coal tar, extraneous carbonaceous matter such as coal or coke dust from gas producers, has been soaked with ferrous sulphate solution, mixed with caustic soda solution, dried and used as catalyst.
In all cases, the operating pressure is normally maintained as high as 700 kg. per sq. cm.
This invention has for its object improvements whereby the hydrogenation of coal may be carried out at considerably lower operating pressures.
This invention is based on the discovery that in the process of hydrogenation of coal, the catalytic action of theiron catalysts can be enhanced by the deposition of the metal in the form of hydrated iron oxide, on the surface ofpowdered coal, before it is subjected to the hydrogenation step.
Based on this discovery, this invention consists of a process of catalytic hydrogenation of coal wherein, as a preliminary step prior to the step of hydrogenation, an iron catalyst comprising hydrated iron oxide is applied in a thoroughly distributed state over the coal, by
the interaction of hydroxide ions with an iron salt solution. The active form of the catalyst is generated in situ by reaction with hydrogen sulfide and hydrogen under the conditions of hydrogenation.
The said deposition of the hydrated iron oxide is effected by the following consecutive steps:
1. Mixing powdered coal with a solution of an iron salt.
2. Gradually adding ammonium hydroxide to the resulting mixture.
3. Allowing the contents to settle, filtering and washing, if desired, with a wash liquor containing NH NO until the washings remain at a pH between 7 and 8.
4. Drying the washed product in a vacuum dryer or under an atmosphere of inert gas.
The hydrated iron oxide deposited on coal is converted into the active form of the catalyst in situ by reaction with hydrogen sulphide and hydrogen under the condition of hydrogenation.
The details of the above-mentioned steps may be varied as follows:
1. The coal may be powdered to a 60-200 mesh B.S., or 250 to 75 microns, before it is mixed with the solution of the iron salt.
2. The iron salt used may be ferrous sulphate, ferric chloride or ferric nitrate.
3. The iron solution may be heated to a temperature of 80100C before it is added to the powdered coal cipitation.
4. The strength of the ammonium hydroxide solution used may be about 1:1.
5. The mass resulting from the addition of ammonium hydroxide solution, may be allowed to settle for l to 2 hours.
6. The washing of the filtered mass may be carried out until the pH value of the washings is between 7 and 8, and in case the iron salt used is ferric chloride, until the washings are free from chloride ion.
7. The drying of the washed mass may be carried out at about 110C, until its moisture content is about 2-3%.
The hydrogenation of the coal particles impregnated with the catalyst as explained above, may be carried out as usual, with or without the use of a vehicle oil.
It is well know that the presence of sulphur promotes the catalytic action of the iron catalyst, and that for ensuring the presence of the required amount of sulphur during the hydrogenation process, this element may be added to the coal mass before it is subjected to hydrogenation. Accordingly, for ensuring the presence of sulphur in desired concentration during the hydrogenation by the improved process according to this invention, a predetermined quantity of sulphur or sulphur bearing compounds capable of producing hydrogen sulphide under the conditions of reaction may be added to the catalyst deposited-coal particles before they are subjected to hydrogenation. Alternatively, gaseous hydrogen sulphide may be used.
The following Examples illustrate the invention and the manner in which it may be carried out into practice:
EXAMPLE 1 ll g. of ferric nitrate [Fe(NO -9H O] in 200. c.c. distilled water is heated to l00C. l-2 c.c. of concentrated nitric acid is added to the solution. 82.g. of powdered coal is added in small portions with mechanical stirring to c.c. distilled water at 80C. containing 5 g. of ammonium nitrate. The ferric nitrate solution is added to the coal suspension.
111 ammonium hydroxide is now added to the suspension in a mixer under conditions of rapid agitation at a rate of 3-4 c.c. per minute till a pH of 8-9 is attained. After being allowed to settle for 1-2 hours the mixture is filtered and washed with 1 percent aqueous ammonium nitrate solution, till the washings showed a pH of 7-8. The residue is washed l-2 times with distilled water and then dried in an atmosphere of nitrogen at C till the moisture content falls to 2-3 percent.
The above dried mass was mixed with 123 g. of carrier or vehicle oil and made into a paste. 0.83 g. of elemental sulphur was added and mixed. The paste was transferred into a rocking type 1 litre autoclave with liner. The autoclave was closed, flashed with hydrogen and finally pressurized to 100 kg/cm with hydrogen gas at room temperature. A test for leakproofness was carried out at this stage.
The autocalve was heated electrically at a rate of 3-4C/min. with rocking. The temperature was brought to 400C and maintained at this level for 3 hours, the inside pressure being measured at every 10 minutes. The heating was stopped but the rocking carried on till the temperature dropped to about C. At this stage the rocking was also stopped and the autoclave was allowed to cool to room temperature.
d.a.f. coal-OBI iii iiiiiij. ata-29a The conversion achieved in the above sequence was 80.7 percent using a catalyst concentration of 1.86 g. of Fe and 0.83 g of sulphur per 100 g. of coal. The
atomic S/Fe ratio was 0.78.
EXAMPLE 2 Example 1 was repeated except that hydrated iron oxide was precipitated separately and not on the coal. The precipitate was dried at 110C, powdered to the same fineness as that of the coal and mechanically mixed with it. Using the same concentration of iron and sulphur as in Example 1, the conversion in this case was 69.0 percent.
EXAMPLE 3 Example 1 was repeated with gradual increase in the amount of sulphur keeping the concentration of iron at 1.86 g. per 100 g. coal. A maximum conversion of 91.3 percent was achieved under the experimental conditions described in Example 1 at a catalyst concentration of 1.86 g Fe and 4.33 g. sulphur per 100 g. coal corresponding to an atomic S/Fe ratio of 4.
EXAMPLE 4 Example 1 was repeated under identical conditions of applying hydrated iron oxide on coal but the hydrogenation test was carried out without the use of carrier or vehicle oil in a 2 litre shaking autoclave. In this case 100 g. of powdered coal was used and the corresponding amount of ferric nitrate was 13.42 g. The amount of water and other reagents were adjusted accordingly.
The method of hydrogenation, recovery and analysis of the products were exactly similar to that in Example In this case, the catalyst concentration was 1.86 g. of Fe and 2.196 g. of sulphur per 100 g. of coal. S/Fe atomic ratio was 2 and the corresponding conversion of coal was 94.7 percent.
EXAMPLE 5 Example 4 was repeated under identical conditions except that ferrous sulphate instead of ferric nitrate was used for the precipitation of hydrated iron oxide.
The conversion in this case was 95.2 percent for the same S/Fe ratio as in Example 4.
EXAMPLE 6 Example 4 was repeated under identical conditions except that instead of hydrated iron oxide, ferrous sulphate was impregnated on the coal in the conventional manner. 1.146 g. of elemental sulphur was added in addition to the stoichiometric amount present in ferrous sulphate to bring the S/Fe atomic ratio to 2. The conversion in this case was 88.0 percent.
EXAMPLE 7 Example 5 was repeated under identical conditions except that no nitric acid and ammonium nitrate were used during the precipitation and washing. Using the same S/Fe atomic ration, the conversion in this case was 95.5 percent.
EXAMPLE 8 Example 7 was repeated under identical conditions except that ferric chloride was used in the place of ferrous sulphate. The corresponding conversion was 97.8 percent.
It will be seen from the foregoing Examples that a. the activity of the catalyst of the present invention is higher than that of the conventional process as indicated by the percentage conversion; and
b. the activity of the improved catalyst is not appreciably effected by the nature of the iron salt used for precipitating the hydrated iron oxide.
The Examples given hereinbefore are merely by way of illustrations for carrying out the present invention and they should not be treated as limitative of the scope of the invention. For instance, the hydrogenation experiments as described in the Examples indicate that the use of vehicle oil is an optional feature for carrying out the invention into practice. Further, it is also possible to carry out the precipitation and washing of the hydrated iron oxide without the use of nitric acid and ammonium nitrate.
As already mentioned, the hydrated iron oxide deposited on coal is converted into the active form of the catalyst in situ by reaction with hydrogen sulphide and hydrogen under the condition of hydrogenation.
1. A process of catalytic hydrogenation of coal comprising: substantially uniformly impregnating coal particles with hydrated iron oxide by precipitation of said iron oxide from an iron solution; adding a sulfuryielding material to said iron oxide-impregnated coal particles; and subjecting the resultant mixture to coal catalytic hydrogenation conditions.
2. A process of catalytic hydrogenation of coal comprising the sequential steps of:
i. mixing powdered coal with a solution of an iron salt so that said salt impregnates said coal;
ii. gradually adding ammonium hydroxide to the resultant mixture in an amount sufficient to achieve effective conversion of the iron salt to hydrated iron oxide;
iii. allowing solids within said mixture to settle, filtering and washing said solids until the filter washings remain at a pH between about 7 and 8;
iv. drying the washed solids in the absence of oxygen;
v. adding a sulfur-yielding material to the dried solids and subjecting the resultant mixture to coal catalytic hydrogenation conditions.
3. A process as claimed in claim 2, wherein the washing referred to in step (iii) is effected with an ammonium nitrate solution.
4. A process as claimed in claim 2, wherein the coal is powdered to a 60-200 mesh or 250- micron size, before it is mixed with the solution of iron salt.
5. A process as claimed in claim 2, wherein the iron salt is selected from the group consisting of ferrous sulfate, ferric chloride and ferric nitrate.
6. A process as claimed in claim 2, wherein the solution of the iron salt is heated to a temperature of 5 80l0OC before the powdered coal is added to it and is maintained at this temperature during step (ii).
7. A process as claimed in claim 2, wherein the ammonium hydroxide solution used for interaction with the iron salt is of a strength of about 1:1.
8. A process as claimed in claim 2, wherein the mixture to which ammonium hydroxide has been added is content is about 2 to 3 percent.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US1946341 *||Mar 30, 1931||Feb 6, 1934||Degussa||Destructive hydrogenation of carbonaceous materials|
|US3502564 *||Nov 28, 1967||Mar 24, 1970||Shell Oil Co||Hydroprocessing of coal|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4021329 *||Jan 15, 1976||May 3, 1977||Suntech, Inc.||Process for dissolving sub-bituminous coal|
|US4067795 *||Jun 14, 1976||Jan 10, 1978||Battelle Memorial Institute||Process for coal liquefaction using electrodeposited catalyst|
|US4134822 *||Jan 3, 1977||Jan 16, 1979||University Of Utah||Process for minimizing vaporizable catalyst requirements for coal hydrogenation-liquefaction|
|US4176041 *||Feb 23, 1978||Nov 27, 1979||Kobe Steel, Ltd.||Method for reforming low grade coals|
|US4354919 *||Feb 4, 1981||Oct 19, 1982||Mitsui Coke Co., Ltd.||Process for the liquefaction of coal|
|US4439305 *||Jul 22, 1982||Mar 27, 1984||Exxon Research And Engineering Co.||Process for pyrolysis of carbonous materials|
|US4464479 *||Apr 27, 1983||Aug 7, 1984||Rheinische Braunkohlenwerke Ag||Method for treating red mud|
|US4504378 *||Feb 18, 1983||Mar 12, 1985||Marathon Oil Company||Sodium tetrachloroaluminate catalyzed process for the molecular weight reduction of liquid hydrocarbons|
|US4510039 *||Apr 15, 1983||Apr 9, 1985||Charbonnages De France||Process for the liquid phase hydrogenation of coal|
|US4557822 *||Dec 27, 1982||Dec 10, 1985||Exxon Research And Engineering Co.||Hydroconversion process|
|US4559129 *||Aug 27, 1984||Dec 17, 1985||Chevron Research Company||Red mud as a first-stage catalyst in a two-stage, close-coupled thermal catalytic hydroconversion process|
|US4559130 *||Aug 27, 1984||Dec 17, 1985||Chevron Research Company||Metals-impregnated red mud as a first-stage catalyst in a two-stage, close-coupled thermal catalytic hydroconversion process|
|US4560465 *||Aug 27, 1984||Dec 24, 1985||Chevron Research Company||Presulfided red mud as a first-stage catalyst in a two-stage, close-coupled thermal catalytic hydroconversion process|
|US4851107 *||Oct 7, 1987||Jul 25, 1989||Veba Oel Entwicklungs-Gesellschaft Mbh||Process for the hydrogenation of heavy and residual oils|
|US4963247 *||Sep 7, 1989||Oct 16, 1990||Petro-Canada Inc.||Hydrocracking of heavy oil in presence of ultrafine iron sulphate|
|US5096570 *||Jun 1, 1990||Mar 17, 1992||The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy||Method for dispersing catalyst onto particulate material|
|US5168088 *||Aug 12, 1991||Dec 1, 1992||The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy||Method for dispersing catalyst onto particulate material and product thereof|
|US5214015 *||Apr 3, 1992||May 25, 1993||The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy||Synthesis of iron based hydrocracking catalysts|
|US5308477 *||Sep 3, 1992||May 3, 1994||University Of Utah||Method for coal liquefaction|
|US5783065 *||Sep 25, 1995||Jul 21, 1998||University Of Utah Research Foundation||Method for coal liquefaction|
|US5948722 *||Oct 14, 1997||Sep 7, 1999||The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy||Method for producing iron-based catalysts|
|US6004453 *||Mar 6, 1998||Dec 21, 1999||Petro-Canada||Hydrocracking of heavy hydrocarbon oils with conversion facilitated by recycle of both heavy gas oil and pitch|
|US8506846 *||May 20, 2011||Aug 13, 2013||Kansas State University Research Foundation||Char supported catalysts for syngas cleanup and conditioning|
|DE3108798A1 *||Mar 7, 1981||Sep 16, 1982||Rheinische Braunkohlenw Ag||Verfahren zur verfluessigung von kohle|
|EP0055311A1 *||Dec 30, 1980||Jul 7, 1982||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Catalysts and hydrocarbon treating processes utilizing the same|
|WO1995029969A1 *||May 2, 1995||Nov 9, 1995||University Of Utah Research Foundation||Method for coal liquefaction|
|U.S. Classification||208/420, 208/951, 208/423|
|Cooperative Classification||C10G1/086, Y10S208/951|