Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3796261 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateMar 12, 1974
Filing dateSep 11, 1972
Priority dateSep 11, 1972
Publication numberUS 3796261 A, US 3796261A, US-A-3796261, US3796261 A, US3796261A
InventorsNutter B
Original AssigneeSchlumberger Technology Corp
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Releasable connection for pressure controlled test valve system
US 3796261 A
Abstract
Methods and apparatus for performing a drill stem test of an offshore well utilizing a pressure controlled test valve. The test valve includes a valve element having a transverse pressure area with the high pressure side exposed to the pressure of fluids in the well annulus and the low pressure side subject to the pressure of a compressible fluid medium contained within a chamber in the test valve. The pressure in the chamber is equalized with the hydrostatic head of the well fluids so that at test depth the same pressure is acting on both sides of the transverse pressure area, whereupon this pressure is confined within the chamber. Then a fluid pressure in excess of the hydrostatic head is applied to the well fluids externally of the test valve to develop a pressure difference across the valve element which causes it to shift from closed to open position.
Images(3)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

United States Patent 1191 Nutter Mar. 12, 1974 [5 RELEASABLE CONNECTION FOR 3,489,438 1/1970 McClure 285/133 R 3,664,443 5 1972 Campbell..... 175/215 x PRESSURE CONTROLLED TEST VALVE SYSTEM Inventor: Beniamin P. Nutter, Bellville, Tex.

Assignee: Schlurnberger Technology I Corporation, New York, NY.

Filed: Sept. 11, 1972 Appl. N0.: 287,931 7 Related US. Application Data [62] Division of Ser. No. 199,554, Nov. 11, 1971.

[52] US. Cl 166/237, 166/152, 166/226, 285/133 R [51] Int. Cl E21b 23/00 [58] Field of Search 166/237, 152, 117.7, 224, 166/226; 175/321, 215; 285/133 R, 133A [56] References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,547,461 7/1925 Steele 175/215 X 2,575,105 11/1951 Hart et al 166/237 3,155,179 11/1964 Hunt et al 175/215 3,393,002 7/1968 Woolley 166/237 X Primary Examiner-David H. Brown Attorney, Agent, or Firm-David L. Moseley; William R. Sherman; Stewart F. Moore ABSTRACT Methods and apparatus for performing a drill stem test of an offshore well utilizing a pressure controlled test valve. The test valve includes a valve element having a transverse pressure area with the high pressure side exposed to the pressure of fluids in the well annulus and the low pressure side subject to the pressure of a -compressible fluid medium contained within a chamwhich causes it to shift from closed to open position.

4 Claims, 7 Drawing Figures PAIENIEU m 12 m4 SHEET 1 UP 3 W m m PATENTEU MR 1 2 I974 SHEET 3 BF 3 Ntmcmcc l RELEASABLE CONNECTION FOR PRESSURE CONTROLLED TEST VALVE SYSTEM This application is a division of application Ser. No. 199,554, filed Nov. ll, 1971.

This invention relates generally to earth formation testing, and more particularly to a new and improved method and apparatus for conducting a drill stem test of an offshore well utilizing a test valve that is remotely controlled by the application of pressure to the well fluids at the surface.

To conduct what is commonly known as a drill stern test, a packer and a tester valve are lowered into a well on a pipe string, and the packer is set to isolate the formation interval to be tested from the hydrostatic pressure of fluids thereabove. The test valve is then opened and closed to alternately flow and shut-in the formations, while pressure recorders make a record of the pressures as a function of time. From the pressure record, many useful formation parameters or characteristics can be determined. Usually a sample of the produced formation fluids is recovered.

For drill stem tests of land based wells, it is typical practice to provide a test valve that can be opened and closed in response to manipulation of the pipe string at the surface. The surface manipulations may either be rotation, longitudinal movement or a combination of the two. However, for offshore wells, which are becoming more and numerous as exploration for oil extends to and beyond the conteniental shelf, it is generally considered to be undesirable to have to mainpulate the pipe string during a drill stem test, particularly for tests conducted from a floating rig that is subject to vertical movement due to the action of waves and tides. This is because there are certain hazards involved in manipulating a pipe string that is under pressure, and operators would prefer to keep the blowout preventers closed against the pipe string at all times during a test. All such precautions are taken, of course, to the view of eliminating the causes which might lead to a fire or blowout with the consequent loss of highly expensive drilling equipment, and to pollution of the waters.

For drill stem testing in the offshore environment, a test system has been developed which does not require pipe manipulation for operation, but rather includes a test valve that moves between open and closed positions in response to the application and release of pressure to the well annulus between the pipe string and the well bore wall. This system utilizes a housing with a slidable inner valve mandrel having a piston with a precharged gas pressure acting on one side and with the other side exposed to annulus pressures. To open the valve, applied annulus pressure compresses the gas and acts to move the valve mandrel to open position. A .release of the applied annulus pressure enables the gas pressure to shift the valve mandrel back to closed condition. However, the principal disadvantage of this approach is that the gas must be precharged at the surface to a value that will maintain the valve mandrel in closed condition during lowering into the well. This is because the hydrostatic pressure increases withdepth, and of course the pressure is tending to force the valve mandrel to open position. Accordingly, extensive calculations are necessary in preparation for a test to determine the gas pressure required for precharging the tool. A large amount of well data is needed including mud weight, testing depth, and temperature at that depth.

Corrections must be calculated for temperature difference due to precharging the gas at the surface. All of this is quite burdensome and is based upon data which is not always available.

It is the principal object of this invention to provide a new and improved drill stern testing system that can be operated by applied annulus pressures and without the necessity for a critical gas precharge and the elaborate surface calculations required in the prior art.

This and other objects are attained in accordance with the concepts of the present invention which from a method or process standpoint comprises the steps of lowering into a fluid-filled well bore and to test depth a pressure controlled test valve including a valve element with a transverse pressure area that is subject on one side to the pressure of the fluids in the well bore and on the other side to the pressure of a compressible fluid medium such as nitrogen gas contained within a chamber in the test valve. As the test valve is lowered, the pressure of the fluid medium is equalized with the hydrostatic head of the fluids externally of the test valve so that the same pressure acts on both sides of the transverse area of the valve element. Thus the valve element is not moved at all as the test valve is lowered. At test depth, the method is further practiced by confining the hydrostatic head of the well fluids at such depth within the chamber, and then applying fluid pressure to the well bore at the surface which results in an excess of fluid pressure at the test valve over and above the normal hydrostatic head that is confined within the chamber. The applied pressure acts across the trans verse area of the valve element to move it from its normal position prohibiting fluid flow from the formations being tested to its open position where the formation fluids can flow via the test valve into the pipe string thereabove. To shut-in the formations for the recordal of pressure build-up information, the applied pressure is released at the surface and the valve element is returned to the closed position. Preferably, the chamber containing the compressible fluid medium is precharged in preparation for lowering into the well to a pressure that is somewhat less than the hydrostatic pressure expected at test depth, however the actual precharge pressure value is not critical because the pressure in the chamber is balanced with the hydrostatic head and is maintained at whatever value that may be as the applied pressure is used to control'the valve element.

From an apparatus standpoint, the concepts of the present invention are attained through the provision of an elongated housing member adapted for connection to a pipe string and having a flow passage extending longitudinally therethrough. A valve element is movable within the housing member between positions closing and opening the flow passage, and is spring biased toward closed position. The valve has oppositely facing pressure surfaces that are arranged such that one face is selectively subjected to the pressure of fluids externally of the housing body through the medium of a compressible fluid such as nitrogen gas, while the other face is always subject to' the pressure of fluids externally of the housing body. Thus, during lowering into a fluid filled well bore the valve is balanced with respect to hydrostatic pressure, and the pressure of the compressible medium precisely reflects the value of hydrostatic pressure externally of the housing body.

The compressible medium is contained in a chamber within the housing member, and the hydrostatic head is applied to the chamber by way of a pressure channel that is adapted to be closed at test depth and prior to initiation of the test. Upon closing of the pressure channel, the hydrostatic pressure value is memorized in the chamber. With the chamber closed, the application of pressure to the fluid in the'annulus will develop a pressure differential across the oppositely facing pressure surfaces of the valve to force it against the bias of the spring to open position, and release of applied pressure will enable the valve to return to closed position. The displacement volume due to movement of the valve is proportioned with respect to the volume of the chamber such that movement of the valve from closed to open position has a negligible effect on the memorized fluid pressure in the chamber. Thus the pressure that is applied to the well annulus to operate the valve is a substantially fixed value for any test depth. The chamber may be precharged at the surface with a pressure that is less than the expected hydrostatic pressure of the well fluids at test depth, however, as previously mentioned this pressure is not critical and there is no need for any elaborate surface calculations in .this regard.

The present invention has other objects and advantages which will become more readily apparent in connection with the following detailed description of preferred embodiments, taken in conjunction with the appended drawings in which:

FIG. I illustrates somewhat schematically a drill stern testing being conducted in an offshore well from a floating rig;

FIGS. 2A and 2B are detailed cross-sectional views of one embodiment of the present invention with parts in positions for running into the well and with the control valve closed FIG. 2B forming a lower continuation of FIG. 2A;

- FIG. 3 is a view similar to FIG. 2 except with the parts in the positions occupied during a portion of a test where the test valve is open;

FIG. 4 is a detailed'cross-sectional view of a releasable connection-between the upper and lower sections of the test valve assembly shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B; and

FIGS. 5A and 5B are cross-sectional views to illustrate a second embodiment of the present invention.

Referring initially to FIG. 1, a drill stem test using equipment constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention is shown being conducted in an offshore well. Although the well may be open hole, it is usually cased at as shown. A riser 11 normally extends from a subsea well head assembly 12 upward to the floating drilling rig or vessel 13 which is anchored or otherwise moored on location. A pipe string 14 extends from the vessel 13 downward into the well and is used to lower the test tools to test depth. The pipe string 14 can include a sub sea control valve assembly 15 of typical design and providing a landing shoulder 16 that is seated in the well head assembly 12 so that the pipe string and test tools therebelow are suspended from a fixed point not subject to vertical motion which the vessel 13 experiences under the influence of wave and tide action. A major string of pipe 17, such as a suitable length drill pipe, is connected to a minor string of pipe 18, such 'as drill collars having a preselected weight, by a slip joint and safety valve combination tool 19 of the type disclosed in application- Ser. No. 43,372, Kisling, filed May 27, I970, now U.S.

Pat. No. 3,645,139 and assigned to the assignee of this invention. The lower end of the minor string 18 may be connected to a reversing valve 20 which is in turn connected to a choke assembly 21, the reversing valve and choke assembly being conventional items of equipment whose details fo'rm no part of the present invention. Of course the choke assembly 21 limits the rate of upward flow of formation fluids during a test, and the reversing valve 20 can be operated in such a manner as to enable fluids that are produced into the pipe string during a test to be recovered at the surface before the test equipment is retrieved.

A pressure controlled test valve 22 that is constructed in accordance wtih the principle of this invention is next connected in the string of tools and will be described in detail herebelow. The test valve 22 may be coupled to the upper end of a flow control valve 23 of the type shown in my U.S. Pat. No. 3,308,887, also assigned to the assignee of this invention, the valve 23 being operated in response to only vertical motion of the pipe string. For purposes of isolating the well inter- -val to be tested from the hydrostatic head of fluids thereabove, awell packer 24 is provided and includes packing elements 25 to seal off the well bore and slips 26 to anchor at the proper level above the well interval to be tested. The packer 24 can be of the type shown in U. S. Pat. No. 3,399,727, McGill, assigned to the as-. signee of the invention, and includes an integral fluid bypass arrangement that enables well fluid to bypass through the packing element 25 during lowering, but is closed off when the packer is set. The elements 25 seal off the cross-section of the well bore to isolate the zone to be tested from the fluid in the annulus thereabove, and of course at the end of the test the bypass referred to above is opened to equalize pressure and enable release-of the packer 24 and retrieval of the tool to the surface. Suspended below the packer 24 is a perforated nipple 27 to enable fluid entry during the test, and of course suitable pressure recorders 28 are provided to make a record of the pressures of fluids versus time as the test proceeds.v Other typical equipment such as a safety joint 28 and a jar 30 can be connected between the control valve 23 and the packer 24 but are shown only schematically to simplify this disclosure.

In general terms, a formation test amounts to a temporary completion of the well, in that the isolated formations are allowed to produce fluids into the pipe string. The formation is then shut-in and the pressure allowed to build up over a period of time. A record of the pressure build-up curve can be analyzed by known techniques to determine formation permeability and the initial or virgin formation pressure, plus other parameters that are invaluable aids to a reservoir engineer in coming to a decision on whether to recommend a permanent completion of the well. Several flow and shut-in pressure records can be obtained for additional information.

Turning now to FIGS. 2A and 28, one embodiment of a pressure operated test valve assembly 22 that is constructed in accordance with the principles of the having its upper end adapted as shown for connection to a pipe string and with its through bore closed by a barrier 37 located above an annular valve seat 38. The outer side walls 39 of the barrier 37 are spaced laterally inwardly with respect to the surrounding internal walls 40 of the adjacent housing section to provide a space 41 for fluid passage. One or more side ports 42 in the walls of the barrier 37 communicate the bore thereof with the space 41. A vertically movable valve mandrel 44 has its upper end portion slidably received within the bore of the barrier 37, and a valve head 45 carries seal elements 46 which engage the valve seat 38 when the valve mandrel is in its upper or closed position. A second valve head 47 is provided on the valve mandrel 44 in spaced relation to the upper valve head 45 and also carries seal elements 48 which normally engage a lower annular valve seat 49. The annular space 50 surrounding the valve mandrel 44 between the seats 38 and 49 provides a sample chamber for trapping the last flowing sample of formation fluids as will be described further below. The center bore 54 of the valve mandrel 44 is open from one end to the other so that fluid pressures are free to act on the upper end surface 51 thereof, however the uppermost end of the mandrel is sealed with respect to the barrier 37 by a suitable seal ring 52. One or more ports 53 extends through the wall of the valve mandrel 44 below the lower valve head 47 to communicate the bore 54 with the interior of the housing section below the valve seat 49. The lower end portion of the housing section 36 has an inwardly directed shoulder 55 through which an intermediate portion of the valve mandrel 44 is sealingly slidable. Fluid leakage is prohibited by a seal ring 56.

The valve mandrel 44 has a stepped diameter outer wall surface to provide a piston section 57 whose outer periphery is sealed against the adjacent cylinder wall 58 by a seal ring 59. A plurality of ports 60 extend laterally through the wall of the housing 36 below the shoulder 55 so that the upwardly facing transverse surface 61 of the piston section 57 is subjected to the pressure of fluids in the well annulus outside the housing. The lower face 62 of the piston section 57 is engaged by a coil spring 63 whose lower end rests on an inwardly direction shoulder 64 on the housing 36. The outer surface of the lower portion 65 of the valve mandrel 44 is sealed with respect to the shoulder 64 by a seal ring 66.

An elongated chamber 67 of substantial volume is formed in a lower portion of the housing 36. The chamber 67 is defined between the outer surface of a tube 70 whose upper end is connected to the shoulder 64, and the surrounding inner wall surface 71 of the housing, the lower end of the tube 70 being sealed against the housing by a suitable seal ring 72. An annular floating piston 73 normally is disposed at the lower end of the, chamber 67 and is provided with internal and external seals 74 and 75. The chamber 67 is adapted to be filled through a suitable valve port (not shown) with a compressible fluid medium such as nitrogen gas, and a suitable communication path 76 extends upwardly through the shoulder 64 so that the pressure of the nitrogen can act upwardly on the downwardly facing transverse surface 62 of the piston section 57 on the valve mandrel 44. The interior space 77 of the housing 36 below the floating piston 73 is placed in communication with the well annulus by a pressure channel that is constituted by a vertically extending port 78 which terminates in a side opening 79. Thus it will be readily appreciated that as the tester valve assembly 22 is lowered into a fluid filled well bore, the hydrostatic head of the well fluids is communicated by the ports 79, 78 and transmitted by the floating piston 73 to the nitrogen within the chamber 67. Inasmuch as'the upper and lower surfaces 61 and 62 of the piston section 57 can be subjected to the same pressure, the hydrostatic head of the well fluids does not tend to move the valve mandrel 44 toward open position. Moreover, the pressure of any fluids present within the bore 50 of the valve mandrel 44 acts upwardly on the lower end surface 80 thereof, downwardly on the upper end surface 51 thereof, and on the lower transverse surface of the lower valve head 47 via the ports 53. It can be demonstrated that the fluid pressures are acting with equal force in opposite longitudinal directions, so that the valve mandrel 44 is balanced with respect to fluid pressures as the equipment is lowered to setting depth. This being the case, the valve mandrel 44 does not move vertically as the hydrostatic head increases.

The lower end of the housing 36 has a reduced diameter portion 82 which is connected by threads 83 to the mandrel 84 of the flow control valve assembly 23. The mandrel 84 is telescopically received within a housing 85 and is movable between extended and contracted positions with respect thereto. As the equipment is being lowered into the well, the mandrel 84 is in the extended position as shown so that the port 79 is open. However, when the packer 25 is set as will be subsequently described, the mandrel 84 moves downwardly with respect to the housing 85 to a position where seal rings 86 and 87 located respectively above and below the port 79 engage the inner wall 88 of a counterbore in the housing 85 to close off the port from communication with the well annulus. In this manner the hydrostatic head of the well fluids at test depth is trapped or memorized in the chamber 67 and does not change to any appreciable extent during operation of the valve as will become more readily apparent herebelow.

The structural details of the flow control valve assembly 23 will not be set forth at length here since reference may be had to the aforementioned U. S. Pat. No. 3,308,887. In general, however, the valve assembly 23 includes an index section 90, a hydraulic delay section 91 and a valve section 92. The index section has a sleeve 93 which is mounted for rotation relative to both the housing 85 and the mandrel 84, and carries an index pin 94 which engages in an external channel configuration 95 on the mandrel. The hydraulic delay section 91 is constituted by a metering sleeve 97 that was within a fluid filled chamber 98 and functions to retard downward movement of the mandrel 84 within the housing 85,.but on the other hand enables free upward movement. The valve section 92 is somewhat similar to that previously described, in that a valve head 99 on the mandrel 84 engages an annular valve seat 100 to close off fluid flow past a transverse barrier 101. When the mandrel 84 moves downwardly, however, a flow path including ports 102 and 103 and the space 104 externally of the mandrel is placed in communication with the bore 105 of the mandrel above the barrier 101.

In operation, the pressure operated test valve assembly 22 is prepared at the surface by injecting a charge of nitrogen gas into the chamber 67 and the chamber can be pressurized to an initial pressure that is not critical and for most tests should be about 2,500 psi. A guide that can be used is to charge the chamber to a pressure about 500 psi less than the hydrostatic pressure at test depth. Of course at the surface and during the initial stages of descent into the well bore, the nitrogen pressure is well in excess of the hydrostatic head of the well fluids and thus biases the valve mandrel 44 in the closed position. The string of tools is lowered from the vessel 13 into the well casing until the packer 24 is located at the proper point above the formation interval to be tested. At a location well above the setting point, the hydrostatic head will have become in excess of the precharge pressure of the nirogen within the chamber 67, and when this occurs the floating piston 73 will begin to move upwardly somewhat as it transmits the hydrostatic head to the compressible medium within the chamber. In any event, the valve mandrel 44 remains stationary because the same pressure is acting on the opposite sides 61 and 62 of the piston section 57. Due to the fact that the medium in the chamber 67 is compressible, however, the piston section 57 can move readily downwardly when a pressure difference is imposed in a downward direction thereacross.

The length of the minor pipe string 18 is selected to provide the proper amount of weight to set the packer 24, and the landing sub 16 is located in the major string 17 at the proper spacing such that when the packer is anchored at setting depth and the string 17 is suspended in the sub sea well head 12, the slip joint 19 is in its closed or contracted condition to enable the weight of the minor string 18 to be applied via the test tools to the packer. Of course this weight compresses and expands the packing elements 25 to seal off the test interval, and moves the tester housing 36 and the mandrel 84 downwardly to cause the control valve 23 to open, admitting fluids into the interior of the pressure operated seat valve 22. Downward movement of the housing 36 with respect to the control valve housing 85 positions the housing portion 82 within the valve seat 88 to close off the port 79 from communication with the well annulus as shown in FIG. 3. The result is to trap or memorize the hydrostatic head of fluids within the chamber 67 so that a substantially constant pressure acts upon the lower surface 62 of the piston section 57 at all times during operation of the tester assembly 22.

With the blowout preventers closed in a typical fashion at the surface so that the well is completely under control a formation 'test can be conducted without re sort to manipulation of the pipe strings 17 or 18 in the following manner. Fluid pressure is applied by suitable surface pumps and control lines (not shown) to the well annulus 106 between the pipe strings l7, l8 and the surrounding casing 10. The pressure acts through the housing ports 60 on the upper surface 61 of the piston section 57 of the valve mandrel 44 to force the mandrel upwardly against the bias of the coil spring 63. In a typical example, an applied annulus pressure of 600 psi will start the valve mandrel 44 moving downwardly, and an applied pressure of 1,200 psi will cause the valve mandrel 44 to move completely downwardly to its open position as shown in FIG. 3. In this position, a fluid flow path is opened upwardly through the tester assembly so that produced formation fluids can enter the pipe string 18, the flow path being through the tube 70, the bore 50 of the valve mandrel 44, the lower mandrel and sleeve ports 53 and 53, the sample chamber 50, the upper sleeve ports42', the barrier wall ports 42 and the annular space 41 between the barrier 37 and the adjacent housing wall 40. The valve is left open for a relatively short flow period of time sufficient to draw down the pressures in the isolated formation interval below the packer 24 and enable connate' fluids within the formation to be produced into the well bore. Then the applied annulus pressure is bled off at the surface to enable the coil spring 63 to force the valve mandrel 44 upwardly to its closed or shut-in position shown in FIG. 2A. The valve mandrel 44 is left in closed position for a shut-in period of time during which the pressure re- .corders 28 make a record of the pressure build-up data.

If desired, the valve mandrel 44 can be shifted between closed and open position repetitively by alternately applying and then releasing fluid pressure in the annulus 106.

As previously mentioned, the valve mandrel 44 is balanced against any opening movement due to hydrostatic fluid pressures during running, and the changes in fluid pressure that occur within the tester assembly 22 during the actual test do not affect the vertical position of the valve mandrel for the same reasons, that is, the pressures at any instant act with equal force in opposite longitudinal directions. Moreover, the parts are sized such that the volume of the chamber 67 that contains the compressed nitrogen gas is quite large in relation to the volume of displacement of the piston section purposes the magnitude of the annulus pressure that is applied to operate the valve is a function. only of the modulus or rate of the coil spring 63, which is of course quite predictable. This feature is important because it provides for a substantially constant value of theapplied annulus pressure that is necessary to operate the valve, without regard to test depth and the hydrostatic head of the fluids present in the well bore at such depth. As a consequence, there are no elaborate calculations as required in the prior art for a critical precharge pressure for the nitrogen within the chamber 67, and the annulus pressure that is applied at the surface to operate the valve mandrel 44 is always a substantially constant amount, independent of test depth. To terminate the test, it is only necessary to lift straight upwardly on the pipe strings 17 and 18 at the surface, thereby extending the slip joint 19 and causing the control valve 23 to close as the mandrel 84 moves upwardly. The bypass associated with the packer124 is opened to equalize pressures across the packer elements 25 so that they can retract, which is then accomplished by further-lifting of the packer mandrel. Of course it will be appreciated that the reversing valve 20 can be operated in a typical fashion if it is desired to remove the fluids that have been produced into the pipe string before the tools arerecovered to the surface.

As the housing 36 is elevated with respect to the control valve housing 85, the ports 79 are exposed to the well annulus, so that the pressure of the nitrogen within the chamber 67 experiences a gradual decrease as the hydrostatic head is reduced during withdrawal of the tools from the well. At the surface the chamber 67 will have the initial precharge pressure. A sample of the last portion of flowing fluids is trapped within the sample chamber 50 upon simultaneous closure of the valve heads 45 and 47, and can be removed for inspection and analysis at the surface.

A form of the present invention which enables a readily accomplished disconnection of the sampler and valve section 35 of the tester assembly 22 is shown in FIG. 4. The valve mandrel 144 is constituted by an upper section 120 and a lower section 121 coupled together by a releasable connection 122. The connection comprises a sleeve 123 that is longitudinally slotted from its upper end to provide a plurality of upwardly extending fingers 124 having internal threads 125 that normally mesh with external threads 126 on the lower end portion of the upper mandrel section 120. In order to corotatively couple the upper mandrel section 120 to the surrounding housing 135, a cross-pin 127 extends through elongated, diagonally opposed slots 128 through the wall of the mandrel section 120, and the ends of the pin 127 are fixed to the lower end of the valve seat sleeve 129. The slots 128 are long enough to enable the valve mandrel to move vertically during pressure actuation thereof as previously described without interference with the cross pin 127. The lower section 121 of the valve mandrel 144 is corotatively coupled to the surrounding section 133 of the housing 136 by a pin 130 which projects into an elongated groove 131 formed in the exterior of the mandrel section 121. Finally the upper and lower sections 132 and 133 of the housing are joined together by threads 134.

To disconnect the valve and sampler section 135 from the valve operator section 136, so that the sampler of fluids in the sample chamber 150 can be taken to a laboratory or the like for inspection and analysis, the upper housing section 132 is rotated with respect to the lower housing section 133 todisconnect the thread 134. Rotation of the housing section 132 causes corresponding rotation of the upper mandrel section 120 with respect to the lower mandrel section 121, since the mandrel section 120 is corotatively coupled to the housing section 132 by the cross pin 127, and since the lower mandrel section 121 is held stationary by the pin projection 130. The threads 125 and 126 are of the same lead and hand as the housing threads 134, whereby the members are simultaneously unthreaded. To reconnect the two sections, it is only necessary again to thread the two housing sections together. The purpose of the laterally flexible fingers 124 is to enable a thread slippage or' ratcheting action of the mandrel threads 126 within the sleeve threads 125 in case these threads are fully engaged before the housing threads 134 are tightly made up.

Turning now to FIGS. A and SE, a second embodiment of the present invention is illustrated. In this example, the housing member 200 has a flow tube 201 disposed and fixed concentrically therein, the flow tube 201 having upper and lower bores 202 and 203 extending above and below a transverse barrier section 204. Flow ports 205 and 206 extend through the wall of the tube 201 above and below the barrier 204. An annular valve sleeve 207 is sealingly slidable on the flow tube 201 adjacent the barrier section 204, and is provided with an internal annulus recess 208 of sufficient length to span the ports 205 and 206 and place them in communication when the valve sleeve is in its upper posi-' tion. In its lower or closed position as shown in FIG. 5A, the valve sleeve 207 has an upper portion 210 with seal rings 211 and 212 that function to close off the ports 205. A lower portion 214 of the valve sleeve 207 has internal and external seals 215 and 216 which engage respectively the outer wall 217 of the tube 201 and the inner wall 218 on an inwardly thickened portion 219 of the housing 200 to provide an annular piston effect. The lower transverse face of the piston 214 is placed in communication with the well annulus by one or more ports 220 that extend through the wall of the housing 200.

A coil spring 222 surrounds the flow tube 201 and has its lower end pressing downwardly against the upper end of the valve sleeve 207, and its upper end engaging an outwardly directed shoulder 223 on the flow tube 201. Of course the spring 222 forcesthe valve sleeve 207 toward its lower or closed position. The annular cavity 224 between the flow tube 201 and the housing 200 provides a large volume chamber that is, as in the case of the first embodiment, filled with a compressible fluid medium such as nitrogen by way of a valved port (not shown). An annular floating piston 225 having inner and outer seal rings 226 and 227 segregates the upper end of the chamber 224 from a hydrostatic pressure input channel 228 which terminates in a side port 229.

A valve assembly 230 for trapping the hydrostatic pressure of the well fluids within the chamber 224 is comprised of an outer member 231 adapted by threads 232 for connection in the pipe string and telescopically disposed over an inner member 233 that is provided by a reduced diameter upper section of the housing 200. The members 231 and 233 are coupled together by coengaging splines 234 and 235, the inner spline grooves having circumferential offsets at their upper portions which are engaged by the outer spline ribs 234 to prevent downward relative movement of the outer member 231 during running. The lower portion 236 of the outer member 231 has upper and lower seal rings 237 and 238, and can span and seal off the side port 229 when the outer member is rotated a part turn to the right and then lowered with respect to the inner member 233 as shown in FIG. 5B.

The operation of the above-described device is essentially similar to the embodiment shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B in that the valve is prepared for use by injecting a precharge of nitrogen gas into the chamber 224. The gas pressure and the force of the coil spring 222 maintain the valve sleeve 207 in its lower or closed position. Inasmuch as the seal rings 211, 212 and 215 are all engaging the same seal diameter of the flow tube 201, the valve sleeve is balanced with respect to the pressure of fluids within the flow tube. Moreover, during lowering the hydrostatic head of fluids is transmitted via the ports 229 and 228 and the floating piston 225 to the chamber 224 and is offset or balanced by the same pressure acting through the annulus ports 220 over the same cross-sectional area of the piston 214. As a consequence, the valve sleeve 207 is completely balanced and does not tend to more vertically as the apparatus is lowered into a fluid filled well bore.

At test depth the packer is set as previously de scribed, and the pipe string is manipulated to cause the outer member 231 to telescope downwardly with respect to the inner member 233, closing off the port 229 and trapping or memorizing the hydrostatic head within the chamber 224. Pressure is applied to the annulus to open the valve and acts through the annulus ports 220 on the lower end surface of the piston 24, shifting the valve sleeve upwardly against the bias of the coil spring 22 to open position where the ports 206 and 206 are in communication via the valve sleeve recess 208 as shown in FIG. 2B. Hereagain, the volume of the chamber 224 is quite large in relation to the displacement volume due to movement of the valve sleeve 207, so that there is practically no increase in pressure within the chamber 224 as the valve sleeve moves upwardly. To close the valve, the applied annulus pressure is bled off, enabling the coil spring 222 assisted by gas pressure to force the valve sleeve 207 downwardly to. its closed position as shown in FIG. 5A.

It will now be apparent that a new and improved pressure controlled tester valve has been disclosed, the valve being operable in response to a substantially fixed value of applied annulus pressure without regard to test depth. The valve element is balanced with respect to hydrostatic pressure in the well bore, so that neither elaborate calculations nor myriads of well data are necessary for successful operation of the tester valve.

Since certain changes or modifications may be made in the disclosed embodiments without departing from the inventive concepts involved, it is the aim of the appended claims to cover all such changes or modifications falling within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.

1 claim:

1. A well tester apparatus comprising: an elongated tubular housing member having upper and lower threadedly connected portions adapted for disposition in a pipe string and having a flow passage extending longitudinally therethrough; a valve mandrel concentrically disposed within said housing member and movable between spaced positions for opening and closing said flow passage, said valve mandrel having upper and lower threadedly connected portions, said upper and lower portions of said valve mandrel and said housing having spaced apart coengageable means defining the ends of a sample chamber adapted in the closed position of said valve mandrel for trapping a sample of formation fluids; first means for preventing relative rotation between said upper portions; and second means for preventing relative rotation between said lower portions, so that joint rotation of said upper portions with respect to said lower portions will simultaneously release said threaded connections.

2. The well tester apparatus of claim 1 wherein said first means comprises a transversely directed member mounted on said upper portion of said housing and engaging in the wall of said upper portion of said valve mandrel.

3. The well tester apparatus of claim 1 wherein said second means comprises'a transversely directed member mounted on said lower portion of said housing member and engaging in the wall of said lower portion of said valve mandrel.

4. The well tester apparatus of claim 1 wherein the threaded connection between the upper and lower portions of said valve mandrel includes a sleeve attached to one portion and being longitudinally slotted from one end to provide a plurality of resilient fingers having threads that mesh with companion threads on the other portionv

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1547461 *Feb 5, 1924Jul 28, 1925Steele Hampton AMethod and apparatus for drilling wells
US2575105 *Sep 1, 1950Nov 13, 1951Hart Jean HTelescoping tail pipe
US3155179 *Aug 4, 1961Nov 3, 1964Kennecott Copper CorpDual-tube drill string for sample drilling
US3393002 *Mar 23, 1965Jul 16, 1968Brown J. WoolleyOvershot retrieving tool
US3489438 *Apr 8, 1968Jan 13, 1970Denali Services Co IncOil well tubing having noncommunicating fluid passages
US3664443 *Nov 28, 1969May 23, 1972Walker Neer Mfg CoDual circulation bumper subs
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3891033 *Jan 4, 1974Jun 24, 1975Byron Jackson IncAnnulus pressure controlled testing apparatus
US3900068 *Mar 11, 1974Aug 19, 1975Byron Jackson IncStroke type drill stem tester
US3901314 *Sep 18, 1974Aug 26, 1975Schlumberger Technology CorpPressure controlled tester valve
US3964305 *Feb 19, 1974Jun 22, 1976Halliburton CompanyApparatus for testing oil wells
US3970147 *Jan 13, 1975Jul 20, 1976Halliburton CompanyMethod and apparatus for annulus pressure responsive circulation and tester valve manipulation
US3987848 *Mar 6, 1975Oct 26, 1976Dresser Industries, Inc.Pressure-balanced well service valve
US4044829 *Jul 19, 1976Aug 30, 1977Halliburton CompanyMethod and apparatus for annulus pressure responsive circulation and tester valve manipulation
US4047564 *Jul 14, 1975Sep 13, 1977Halliburton CompanyWeight and pressure operated well testing apparatus and its method of operation
US4050516 *Jun 24, 1976Sep 27, 1977Dresser Industries, Inc.Method of injecting fluids into underground formations
US4059153 *Dec 2, 1976Nov 22, 1977Halliburton CompanyWeight and pressure operated well testing apparatus and its method of operation
US4063594 *Jun 11, 1976Dec 20, 1977Dresser Industries, Inc.Pressure-balanced well service valve
US4076077 *Dec 2, 1976Feb 28, 1978Halliburton CompanyWeight and pressure operated well testing apparatus and its method of operation
US4489786 *Sep 19, 1983Dec 25, 1984Halliburton CompanyLow pressure responsive downhole tool with differential pressure holding means
US4515219 *Sep 19, 1983May 7, 1985Halliburton CompanyLow pressure responsive downhole tool with floating shoe retarding means
US4537258 *Sep 19, 1983Aug 27, 1985Halliburton CompanyLow pressure responsive downhole tool
US4573535 *Nov 2, 1984Mar 4, 1986Halliburton CompanySleeve-type low pressure responsive APR tester valve
US4597439 *Jul 26, 1985Jul 1, 1986Schlumberger Technology CorporationFull-bore sample-collecting apparatus
US4633952 *Apr 3, 1984Jan 6, 1987Halliburton CompanyMulti-mode testing tool and method of use
US4655288 *Jul 3, 1985Apr 7, 1987Halliburton CompanyLost-motion valve actuator
US4711305 *Dec 31, 1986Dec 8, 1987Halliburton CompanyMulti-mode testing tool and method of testing
US6035880 *May 1, 1997Mar 14, 2000Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Pressure activated switch valve
US6634429Aug 17, 2001Oct 21, 2003Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Upper zone isolation tool for intelligent well completions
US20140332224 *May 9, 2013Nov 13, 2014Baker Hughes IncorporatedDual barrier open water completion
EP0875659A2 *May 1, 1998Nov 4, 1998Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Valve for use in a subterranean well
WO2002018743A1 *Aug 16, 2001Mar 7, 2002Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Multi zone isolation tool and method for subterranean wells
Classifications
U.S. Classification166/237, 166/152, 285/123.1
International ClassificationE21B34/00, E21B49/08, E21B34/10, E21B49/00
Cooperative ClassificationE21B34/10, E21B49/088
European ClassificationE21B34/10, E21B49/08T2