Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3803029 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateApr 9, 1974
Filing dateOct 8, 1969
Priority dateNov 21, 1968
Also published asDE1958113A1
Publication numberUS 3803029 A, US 3803029A, US-A-3803029, US3803029 A, US3803029A
InventorsBlecharczyk S
Original AssigneeFram Corp
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Materials purification
US 3803029 A
Abstract  available in
Images(2)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

United States Patent 11 1 1111 3,803,029 Blecharczyk 1 Apr. 9, 1974 15 1 MATERIALS PURIFICATION 3.231.324 7/1966 Young 210/39 x 3,232,434 2 1966 Alb 210 17 1751 lnvemorl Stephen Blecharczyk Kmgston, 3,244,621 411966 1 210/39 ii 3,337,454 8/1967 01666666161 210/80 x 4 3,442,798 5/1969 Schoeffel et al. 210/40 [73-] Assgnee g i Cm'poramn East Provldence 3,455,820 7/1969 Joyce et a1 210/80 x FOREIGN PATENTS OR APPLICATI NS 22 Filed: 061. s, 1969 O I 324,632 12/1902 France 210/40 [21] 4352 OTHER PUBLICATIONS Related Application Data Rudolfs, W. et al., Activated Carbon in Sewage Treat- [63] Continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 777,590, Nov. 21, ment, Sewage Works Journal, V01. 17, Sept. 1935, pp.

1 68, aba don 852, 863 and 880 relied on.

Babbitt, H. E., Sewerage and Sewage Treatment, Sixth [52] US. Cl 210/16, 210/17, 210/30, Edit, 1947 John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 454

210/31210/40 and 455 relied on. [51] Int. Cl C02c 1/04, C02b 1/14 [58] .Field Of Search 210/3-8, 17, Primary Examiner-Sam-ih N Zaharna 210/39 30 Assistant Examiner-Thomas G. Wyse [56] References Cited 1 57 ABSTRACT UNITED STATES PATENTS Process of biologically treating waste material in 1.1891 14 6/1916 Irwin 210/203 which adsorbent is employed to accelerate the rate of 11398-638 2/1933 Rose-m biological degradation while micro-organisms in turn 19911896 2/1935 l' biologically regenerate the adsorbent for re-use. 2,477,815 8/1949 Mallory.... 3,078,188 2/1963 Assalini 2110/80 X @LUQI AEFl/AT-ION l ACTIVATED 510001: a ACTIVATED CARBON 16 Claims, 6 Drawing Fig ures DIGESTER SLUDGE v DRAW-OFF ATENTED APR 9 I974 SHEET 1 BF 2 INFLUENT LERATIVONT TT EFFLUENT AEROBIC DIGESTER ACTIVATED SLUDGE & ACTIVATED CARBON SLUDGE DRAW-OFF EFFLUENT INFLUENT REACTOR REACTOR REACTOR REACTOR 4 w m z W F m m CQ 0 /\Q o /o m o 4 MA 4R /m,

MATERIALS PURIFICATION This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Pat. application Ser. No. 777,590, filed Nov. 21, 1968, now abandoned.

This invention relates to material purification, such as the treatment of organic waste by biological degradation with microorganisms (e.g., in activated sludge).

A primary object of the invention is to provide for extended use of adsorbent material in the presence of organic impurities. Other objects are to improve the efficiency of conventional activated sludge waste treatment; to provide for simple and economic treatment of industrial or municipal waste (interchangeably or simultaneously); and to provide a simple, reliable, and economical waste treatment system particularly suitable for reducing to acceptable pollutional levels the color, B.O.D., and suspended solids found in textile finishing wastes, or other wastes in which the concentration of soluble organic pollutional materials is high, all without a solids disposal problem.

The invention features use of a quantity of a particulate adsorbent to adsorb from a liquid medium organic impurities in an amount greater than the adsorptive capacity of. the adsorbent, and, either simultaneously with said adsorption or intermittently between adsorption cycles, reactivating the adsorbent by biologically de grading adsorbed impurities. In preferred embodiments raw waste (raw in the sense that it contains organic impurities in an amount which, over the intended cycle of use, would saturate the adsorbent without reactivation) is fed to a fixed bed of adsorbent; the adsorbent is periodically reactivated by directing aerated activated 7 sludge up into the bed in such a way as' to partially fluidize the adsorbent; the bed is maintained between, and fills less than the volume enclosed by, two perforated walls having 18 40 percent open space with perforations not greater in size than the average adsorbent particle size; and the liquid medium to be treated passes downwardly through a series arrangement of fixed beds during the treatment mode, and the sludge is circulated upwardly through the same beds arranged in parallel during the reactivation mode. In preferred embodiments for water purification the beds are flushed with pure water after reactivation. In other preferred embodiments anaerobic reactivation of the adsorbent occurs during flow of the liquid medium in the treatment mode; and waste flow is upward through a first bed, and, after passage through an aeration zone for controlling methane production, upward through a screen supported bed. In still other preferred embodiments activated sludge, activated carbon, and the liquid medium to be treated are mixed, liquid is separated therefrom, and the solids portion of the waste, together with adsorbed liquids, are thereafterdegraded under aeration by the sludge; and the sludge and adsorbent, having been thus reactivated, are returned to treat 'a new charge of organic impurities.

Other objects, features, and advantages will appear from the following description of preferredembodiments of the invention, taken together with the at tached drawings, in which:v

FIG. 1 is a flow chart illustrating one preferred embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic view of a vessel for use in a waste treatment process, such as in the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating a representative operational cycle of another preferred embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 4 is a vessel for use in the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 3;

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of another embodiment; and

FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of yet another embodiment.

Referring first to FIG. 1, there is shown a flow chart for a continuous waste treatment process. The influent waste material, mixed with activated sludge and adsorbent, enters the aeration contact zone which may be a large open tank through which sufficient air is bubbled, such as through the bottom, merely to prevent the formation of significant odors, but insufficient to initiate biological digestion of the waste. The influent waste may be, e.g., largely soluble materials obtained by pre settling the raw waste in a holding tank and drawing off the supernatant liquid. Or, the influent waste may be a heavy liquor including both soluble and comminuted solid organic waste. Also' present in the aeration contact zone are activated sludge and an adsorbent, such as activated carbon. The waste is maintained in this zone until colloidal matter is adsorbed (about onehalf hour), soluble organics being adsorbed by both the sludge and the activated carbon, but not long enough to enable substantial digestion of these organics by the sludge. The liquor is then transferred to the clarifier, which is simply a settling tank which, advantageously, is shaped like vessel 14 shown in FIG. 2. The effluent or supernatant liquid is drawn off, from vessel 14, past barrier 15, through outlet 16, whereas the adsorbent and sludge are drawn off through outlet 18, located at the lower end of sloped lower wall 20, Flow into vessel 14 is through liquid inlet line 22. Normally, the adsorbent material will settle most readily, so-that negligible quantities remain suspended for passing over this barrier and through outlet 16. If the waste spends too long in the aeration contact zone, settling becomes more difficult and more sludge will be lost (probably because of the increased sludge activity).

The adsorbent and activated sludge, carrying adsorbed and otherwise entrained organic wastes, are then fed to the reaeration zone, which advantageously is a somewhat larger tank than that used to provide the aeration contact zone. Air (oxygen) is bubbled into the reaeration zone at a rate and in an amount sufficient to complete digestion of the entrained materials, forming either gas (predominantly CO or more sludge. It has been found that the use of an adsorbent inhibits sludge formation, probably due to a controlled feed of adsorbed organics from the adsorbent to the sludge, which consequently enables regulation of the sludge level and constant recirculation of the sludge and adsorbent without constant sludge removal.

When the activated sludge does begin to accumulate in the system, the aerobic digester may be connected sludge plus auto-oxidation, resulting in the destruction of much-of the sludge. The remaining supernatant liqcent reduction values listed below in Table l are average values obtained from composite samples of each COD. The values shown for suspended solids are for activated sludge solids only. The COD was measured by the standard chromic acid oxidation method set forth in Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water" (American Public Health Association, twelfth Ed.).

Table 11 lists the results obtained from treating samduring certain peak hours, and only intermittently durpics of the same COD with activated sludge alone,

ing other times of the day.

tithes? any .ast a js rbsr- :lAB Ll-ZJ (Sludge & Activated Carbon) influent Waste Suspended COD, mg/l Detention Time, hr. Solids, ppm COD Reduction Reaer- Aeration Aeration ation Contact Reaeration Contact Contact Total Soluble Zone Zone Zone Zone Total Soluble TABLE ll (Sludge Only) ,losses being at the claritier, where some negligibly small amount may fail to settle, and at the aerobic digester, where some negligibly small amount may be removed with the sludge- Lea ues;

The system illustrated in FIG. 1 was used to treat raw waste (a mixture of sanitary and industrial waste obtained from the East Providence, Rhode Island treatment plant) which contains approximately 30 per cent industrial wastes with a high concentration of dissolved organics. Granular activated carbon (Witco Grade 718, 12 X 30 mesh, manufactured by the Witco Chemical Co.', New York, New York) was added to the sludge in a carbon to sludge weight ratio of one. This large quantity of carbon was used because daily COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand, i.e., the theoretical measure of oxygen needed for the chemical oxidation of the organics in the waste, expressed as a weight of oxygen per unit volume) variations from 400 mg/liter to greater than 1,200 mg/liter are frequently encountered within any 8 hour operating period when indusv.trial wastes are being received. The return (from the reaera'tion zone) activated sludge and carbon were premixed with the influent waste, under somewhat turbulent conditions, prior to entering the aeration contact zone. 100 per cent recycle of the regenerated activated sludge and carbon was used, no solids being diverted to the aerobic digester.

The results of this treatment are set forth in Table 1, below, for two different CODs. The influent and per 30 ture resulted in a remarkable reduction in soluble "'aiidii'dfifidrthan about 40 percent open space pro- COD, and a very large reduction in total COD. Moreover, a comparison of the suspended solids accumulated in the reaeration-zone indicates that the sludge accumulation has been considerably lessened where the sludge-adsorbent mixture was employed. Because of the decreased amount of sludge solids necessary and accumulated a considerable reduction in equipment size may therefore be accomplished. Moreover, it is not necessary to employ, e.g., the aerobic digester as often as i e qs ssmw a th sti stal slaqssal as is used- FIG. 3 illustrates a second embodiment of thein vention, in which influent is passed down through one or several of a series of reactors. A, B, C, D. Advantageously, each reactor is of the design shown in FIG. 4,

5 and comprises a tank 30 (which may be rectangular,

cylindrical, conical, etc) having waste inlet ports 32, waste outlet ports 34, an oxygen inlet port 36, and an air eliminator valve 37,- which allows passage of gas, but not of liquid, out of the reactor.

Bracket pairs 38, 40 support two identical perforated members 42 for holding a packed column of adsorbent therebetween. This column of adsorbent advantageously does not fill the volume between the members.

These perforated members are preferably made of perforated sheet (rather than a woven screen) which permits a rapid liquid flow through the adsorbent column. Perforated members having atleast abgut 18% vided by uniformly spaced perforations are particularly useful for promoting essentially clogging-free rapid waste treatment. The size of the perforations should not be greater than the average size of the particles.

Referring again to FIG. 3, in the representative operational cycle of the reactors shown, column D is connected to a source of activated sludge which is under constant aerobic agitation to maintain the sludge active. The oxygen is bubbled in, through inlet 36, in a sufficient amount to permit complete biological degradation of materials adsorbed by the packed adsorbent. The adsorbent in reactor D is reactivated by passing sludge up through the lower perforated member, through the adsorbent, at a rate sufficient to fluidize the adsorbent in the volume between the perforated members and thereby allow overall contact between adsorbent and sludge. This fluidizing of the adsorbent is made possible by providing a space between the packed adsorbent and the uppermost perforated member. Where the perforated members have perforations equal to the average size of adsorbent, even where the adsorbent used includes a large number of particles of smaller size than the perforations, no more than negligibly small amounts of adsorbent are removed from the reactor with the sludge. Similarly, liquid waste passage down through the column also causes no more than a negligible loss of adsorbent. Thus, substantially all the adsorbent is reactivated and remains in the column for reuse. The sludge-adsorbent contact is continued until all the adsorbed materials are digested-by the sludge, thus reactivating the adsorbent. Reactor D is then shut off from the activated sludge, and, if desired, is then connected up to the waste inlet in lieu of one of reactors A, B, or C which, as shown, are connected in series to a source of waste. Unlike the activated sludge in the reactivation cycle, the incoming waste passes down through each reactor under sufficient pressure to fill the reactor, in the presence of sufficient oxygen (e.g., by bubbling oxygen through the reactors), to cause degradation of organic impurities in the column.

The adsorbent, after treatment with the activated sludge, will retain a large amount of sludge both on its surface and entrained between adjacent adsorbent particles. The net result is an activated sludge-adsorbent mixture for treating incoming waste, such as described with reference to FIGS. 1 and 2, which is constantly aerated through inlet 36. The surface of the adsorbent is also believed to aid in degradation by providing sites at which biological activity may take place. In addition, when packed in a column, the adsorbent will also serve as a filter medium, sothat most waste solids will not pass with the effluent to the packed adsorbent column in the next reactor. After passage through three (or a lesser or greater number, depending on the nature of the waste, the desired efficiency, etc.) packed adsorbent columns, only anegligible amount of solids will remain in the effluent.

Where the incoming waste is mostly sanitary waste, the adsorbent will be continually reactivated in its packed column, with proper flow rate adjustment and dissolved oxygen level, and hence need not be often disconnected from the waste inlet and contacted with the activated sludge of the reservoir. During peak periods (e.g., in a municipal waste system), however, the buildup of sludge in the column and the buildup of adsorbed organics in the adsorbent will necessitate periodically disconnecting each reactor from the incoming waste and connecting it instead to the activated sludge reservoir. If sludge buildup in the reservoir becomes excessive, an aerobic digeste'r, such as described in FIG. 1, may be provided for periodic reduction of the solids content of the reservoir sludge.

Where the raw waste is primarily industrial, the reasons for the activated sludge reservoir may be the reverse, namely the microorganism content of the column may be too low to permit in situ reactivation of adsorbent. Thus, additional microorganisms must be supplied by adding sludge periodically from the activated sludge reservoir. Advantageously, nitrogen or phosphorous may also be added to the column to promote the growth of sludge.

The adsorbent columns are particularly useful in the handling of industrial wastes. Because much of the soluble organic material is adsorbed by the adsorbent and slowly fed to the sludge for digestion, the sludge is given sufficient time to become biologically acclimated to the organics in the waste, resulting in more efficient degradation. Thus, the large slug doses of organic materials frequently found in industrial waste, and capable of destroying the sludge if fed in a single dose, are removed immediately in large part by the adsorbent and slowly refed to the sludge, allowing sufficient time for biological acclimation.

EXAMPLE 2 Using the system described in FIGS. 3 and 4, a syn thetic waste was treated for longer than l0 months using the same activated carbon without a loss in removal efficiency.

The adsorbent columns used were six feet in length, two inches in diameter and were packed with 1,200 grams per column of Witco Grade 718 (12 X 30 mesh) granular activated carbon. The carbon was restrained using a perforated screen with 0.045 inch diameter holes in a staggered fashion, having 26 per cent open area. Flow rate through the system was maintained at 12 gallons per minute per square foot of cross sectional area.

The reactivation cycle from the activated sludge reservoir was carried out with up-flow at 10 gallons per minute per squarefoot of cross sectional area. sufficient oxygen was bubbled up through each reactor both during the reactivation cycle and during waste treatment to maintain the dissolved oxygen level at greater than 2 ppm. The system utilized activated sludge obtained from a nearby waste treatment plant which, as used in the regeneration system, had a solids content of less .than 1,000 milligrams per liter and generally less than 200 milligrams per liter.

The synthetic waste contained the following materi' als and had a COD of 295 milligrams per liter:

Starch, soluble Hydrated sodium acetate (NaC H O GH O) With three such columns in series at the above described conditions, the COD removal efficiency was maintained at between 46 and 58 per cent, the average being about 51 per cent. The rate of removal can, of course, be increased by decreasing the flow rate or increasing the column length, or both.

The apparatus and process described in FIGS. 3-4 may be used for other purification processes, such as water purification. For such a use, the adsorbent columns would again be periodically activated with activated sludge. However, for use in water purification, the columns would preferably be flushed after each activation cycle to remove activated sludge therefrom.

Adsorbent materials, for use in this invention, in addition to being chemically inert to the surrounding medium (and insoluble therein) should be particulate in form, presenting a large surface area to the incoming waste and thus providing a large number of reaction sites and a high rate of adsorption. Best results have been obtained with adsorbents which also readily settle out from the surrounding medium, where the process used requires solids separation. Where a packed column is employed, the particles should be large enough to enable the use of a screen size consistent with the desired rapid liquid flow through the system. Activated carbon, either in granular or powdered form, is a particularly advantageous adsorbent, the granular form being preferred for ease in settling and rapid liquid flow, although having a lesser total surface area, per unit weight, than the powdered form. Activated carbon above about 20 X 40 mesh may be considered granular, and below- 20 X 40 mesh powdered.

A further advantage for the use of adsorbents is in the treatment of non-biodegradable organics found in waste, such as the alkyl benzene sulfonates (ABS). In such a case, the waste may be separately treated with adsorbent alone prior to being treated with sludge. After adsorption of these materials, the adsorbent may be removed and contacted with an oxidizing agent of a strength and for a time sufficient to convert the ad-.

sorbed non-biodegradables into biodegradable materials. The adsorbent is then reintroduced into the actiuseful for treating textile wastes. Sludge tank 100 is connected through pump 102 and parallel lines 104, 106, 108, and.l10, to three way valves 112, 114, 116, and 1 18, respectively at the bottom ports to adsorption columns. 120, 122, 124, and 126. Each column is as described in connection with FIG. 4. Lines 104-110 respectively include flow control valves 130, 132, 134, and 136.

Waste inlet line 140 is connected through pump 142 and three way valve 144 to three way valve 146 at the top port of column 120, and to by-pass line 148. Three way valves 150, 152, and 154 at the top ports of columns 122', l24, and 126, are respectively connected to valve 112, 114, and 116. Each valve 146, 150-154 is additionally connected to tank 100. Separate air inlet and outlet ports (not shown)vare respectively provided at the bottom and top of each of tank 100 and columns 120-126. Valve 118 is connected to treated effluent line 160.

' In operation, with the valves appropriately positioned, waste input is pumped downwardly through each of columns 120-126 in series during the treatment mode. During the regeneration cycle sludge is pumped upwardly through columns 120-126 in parallel, providing effective biological degradation of impurities adsorbed by the carbon, while minimizing the depletion of the dissolved oxygen in the sludge. Separate regeneration of any column is also possible. Aeration is carried out as needed to maintain. biological activity. As a re- -sult of the regeneration over a period of time the In the embodiment of FIG. 6 tank 200 is partitioned to provide a bed 202 of activated carbon, unconfined at its top, and a second bed 204 of activated carbon supported above the floor of the tank on screen 206. A flow channel 208 extends between the two beds and beneath bed 204, and has air inlet 210 and outlet 212 between the beds. Air nozzles 214 are above bed 204. Channel 208 communicates with the top of bed 202 over partition 216. Waste inlet 220 is near the bottom of bed 202, the effluent port 222 above bed 204. In operation waste influent (e.g., domestic waste, containing suspended organic solids and bacteria) flows upwardly through bed 202, some solids being filtered out and retained in the bed, liquid impurities being adsorbed. Concurrently with that filtration and adsorption, anaerobic degradation of the filtered and adsorbed impurities occurs, thereby regenerating the adsorptive capacity of the carbon, solubilizing some of the retained solids, and reducing the particle size of the remaining solids. The bed can expand upwardly to free itself of large solids. As flow continues through channel 208 aeration occurs, to limit the production of methane incident to anaerobic degradation. Bed 204 functions similarly to bed 202, but the increased presence of oxygen causes the biological degradation to be partly aerobic. The solids are of sufficiently small particle size to avoid plugging of screen 206. The aeration above bed 204 maintains an aerobic effluent.

If the rate of biological degradation in beds 202 and 204 is less than that of contamination, it may be necessary to intermittently operate tank 200 in a regeneration cycle, by either completely aerating the beds, or

- major portion of said chemical oxygen demand, that improvement comprising increasing the efficiency of said process by contacting said waste material with aquantity of particulate adsorbent prior to completion of said degv radation, v

effectively exposing said adsorbent to said organisms to free said adsorbent of pollutant adsorbed during said contacting, thereby contributing to said degradation, and thereafter repeatedly contacting substantially all said same'adsorbent with additional quantities of said waste material, and repeatedly exposing said same adsorbent to said organisms, without the addition of additional quantities of said adsorbent, at least until the total amount of pollutant ultimately so adsorbed and degraded exceeds the original adsorptive capacity of said same adsorbent. I 2. The process of claim 1 wherein said contacting occurs at least in part while said adsorbent is effectively exposed to said organisms.

3. The process of claim 2 wherein said microorganisms are supplied at least in part'as part of said waste material.

4. The process of claim 1 wherein said adsorbent is granular activated carbon.

5. The process of claim 1 wherein said adsorbent is formed in a fixed bed to which raw waste is fed, and fluid is passed upwardly through said bed while said microorganisms are at said sites, to loosen said bed by fluidization.

6'. The process of claim wherein said fluid carries activated sludge.

7. The process of claim 1 wherein said waste is passed downwardly through a plurality of fixed beds of said adsorbent in series during a treatment mode, and a fluid carrying said micro-organisms is passed upwardly through said beds in parallel during a reactivation mode.

8. The process of claim 1 wherein said waste is passed upwardly through a plurality of fixed bedsof said adsorbent in series, said beds being separated by an aeration zone, said adsorbent being reactivated by anaerobic degradation.

9. The process of claim 1 wherein said waste material includes sewage.

10. A process of biologically degrading industrial or sanitary waste material having a high chemical oxygen demand and comprising a liquid medium having a substantial concentration of organic pollutants therein, comprising the steps of contacting said waste material with a mixture of micro-organisms and a particulate adsorbent over a period of time sufficient to cause said adsorbent to remove from said liquid medium a quantity of said pollutants in excess of the adsorptive capacity of said adsorbent and to cause said micro-organisms to degrade said pollutants at an average rate exceeding the capability of said micro-organisms in the absence of said adsorbent, to thereby biologically eliminate at least a major portion of said chemical oxygen demand,

effectively exposing said adsorbent to said microorganisms to free said adsorbent of said pollutants adsorbed during said contacting, thereby contributing to said degradation and biologically regener-- removed pollutants and to maintain said sludge in biologically active condition. I

12. The process of claim 11 wherein said carbon is powdered.

13. The process of claim 11 wherein said carbon is granulated.

14. The process of claim 1 1 wherein said waste material is initially contacted with said mixture in a first chamber, said degradation occurs in a second chamber after separation of said clarified effluent, and said mixture is recirculated to said first chamber after said degradation.

15. The process of claim 1 1 operated on a continuous basis.

16. The process of claim 1 1 wherein said waste material is mixed with said mixture under turbulent conditions.

Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3904518 *May 27, 1971Sep 9, 1975Du PontWaste water treatment process
US3907673 *Dec 28, 1971Sep 23, 1975Fram CorpTreating waste
US3957632 *Mar 24, 1972May 18, 1976Sterling Drug Inc.Waste-water purification
US3980556 *Jan 13, 1975Sep 14, 1976Ontario Research FoundationAdsorption biooxidation treatment of waste waters to remove contaminants therefrom
US4008159 *Jan 21, 1975Feb 15, 1977Ontario Research FoundationRenovation of waste water
US4008161 *Nov 29, 1974Feb 15, 1977Pulp And Paper Research Institute Of CanadaPurification
US4053396 *Jan 20, 1975Oct 11, 1977Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Control of aerobic biological growth in activated carbon waste water treatment
US4069147 *Aug 2, 1976Jan 17, 1978Chemetron CorporationWaste water treatment with oxygen
US4069148 *May 27, 1971Jan 17, 1978E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And CompanyBiologically active solids, activated carbon, oxidation
US4076615 *Oct 6, 1975Feb 28, 1978Battelle Pacific N. W. LaboratoriesProcess and system for treating waste water
US4076616 *Jun 11, 1976Feb 28, 1978Luigi VerdeProcess for the biological purification of sewage
US4080287 *Oct 20, 1976Mar 21, 1978Union Carbide CorporationActivated carbon treatment of oxygenated wastewater
US4168228 *Jun 15, 1977Sep 18, 1979Standard Oil Company Of IndianaWaste water purification
US4172781 *Jun 15, 1977Oct 30, 1979Standard Oil Company (Indiana)Waste water process for treatment of strong wastes
US4188289 *Jul 18, 1978Feb 12, 1980Ferdinand BesikProcess for purification of sanitary waters
US4200524 *Oct 25, 1978Apr 29, 1980Biospherics IncorporatedBio-surface separation process
US4237002 *Jan 24, 1979Dec 2, 1980Zurn Industries, Inc.Absorption on activated carbon of impurities in waste liquid which inhibit its biological treatment
US4248706 *Sep 29, 1978Feb 3, 1981Westvaco CorporationTwo stage fluid bed regeneration of spent carbon
US4255266 *May 30, 1979Mar 10, 1981O T V (Omnium De Traitements Et De Valorisation)Water purification process
US4271013 *Apr 24, 1979Jun 2, 1981Republic Steel CorporationMethod and apparatus for removing biodegradable compounds from wastewater
US4292176 *Aug 14, 1980Sep 29, 1981Standard Oil Company (Indiana)Use of activated carbon in waste water treating process
US4338198 *Oct 22, 1980Jul 6, 1982Westvaco CorporationTwo stage fluid bed regeneration of spent carbon
US4407717 *Nov 24, 1982Oct 4, 1983Sterling Drug Inc.Wastewater treatment process
US4415451 *Aug 25, 1981Nov 15, 1983Iseki & Co., Ltd.Aeration and circulating microorganism-implanted coal particles; sludge
US4444664 *Nov 30, 1979Apr 24, 1984Societe Anonyme d'Etudes, de Recherches et de Productions d'Agents Chimiques-E.R.P.A.C.Process for the biological treatment of a liquid effluent on an adsorbing material bed
US4663047 *Sep 20, 1985May 5, 1987Bayer AktiengesellschaftProcess for purifying waste water
US4681685 *Jun 25, 1985Jul 21, 1987Dorr-Oliver Inc.Fluidized bed reactor
US4810386 *Jan 4, 1988Mar 7, 1989Zimpro/Passavant Inc.Aeration, settling
US4857198 *Jul 29, 1988Aug 15, 1989Zimpro/Passavant Inc.Process for treatment of water containing volatile and toxic compounds
US4894162 *Apr 27, 1988Jan 16, 1990Ciba-Geigy CorporationTreatment of volatile organic substances at waste water treatment plants
US4897196 *Feb 17, 1988Jan 30, 1990Zimpro/Passavant Inc.Two-stage batch wastewater treatment
US5068036 *Mar 30, 1990Nov 26, 1991Chemical Waste Management, Inc.Activated sludge process with in situ recovery of powdered adsorbent
US5106496 *Jun 27, 1991Apr 21, 1992Ciba-Geigy CorporationTreatment of volatile organic substances at waste water treatment plants
US5240611 *Nov 8, 1991Aug 31, 1993Advanced Bio-Gest, Inc.Organic waste recycling system and method
US5653675 *Jun 8, 1994Aug 5, 1997Canon Kabushiki KaishaApplying a substance to eliminate microorganisms which eat pollutant-degrading microorganisms
US6835560Oct 18, 2001Dec 28, 2004Clemson UniversityGeneration of ethanol from organic waste; obtain organic waste, mix in nsolution, incubate with gas containing ozone, expose to microorganisms, recover ethanol
US7332084 *Jul 13, 2006Feb 19, 2008Kurita Water Industries, Ltd.multistage activated sludge process involving a predation effect caused by microorganisms realizes further improvement in treatment efficiency and further decrease in the amount of excess sludge generated while a stable quality of the treated water is maintained; aerobic and anaerobic treatment
US7498163Dec 7, 2004Mar 3, 2009Clemson UniversityLoading organic material into a vessel,having at least first and second zones;supplying an oxidizing agent of ozone or hydrogen peroxide to break down; agitating by peristaltic action organic material, oxidizing agent, and water in to further oxidize and break down; supplying microorganism
US7651615Dec 22, 2006Jan 26, 2010Clemson University Research FoundationLoading organic material into vessel, supplying ozone and water into vessel, separating organic material into solid material and liquid material, and reconditioning water from liquid material for use again; ozone oxidizes and breaks down at least a portion of organic material
Classifications
U.S. Classification210/618, 210/675, 210/661, 210/694, 210/630
International ClassificationC02F3/30, C02F3/12, C02F1/28, C02F3/28
Cooperative ClassificationC02F3/085, C02F3/30, C02F1/283, C02F3/2806
European ClassificationC02F3/08D, C02F3/30, C02F3/28C, C02F1/28D