|Publication number||US3812912 A|
|Publication date||May 28, 1974|
|Filing date||Jun 30, 1972|
|Priority date||Oct 22, 1970|
|Publication number||US 3812912 A, US 3812912A, US-A-3812912, US3812912 A, US3812912A|
|Original Assignee||Gulf Research Development Co|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (5), Referenced by (68), Classifications (16), Legal Events (1)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
United States Patent [1 1 Wuenschel 1 1 May 28, 1974  REPRODUCIBLE SHOT HOLE APPARATUS 2,214,226 9/1940 En glish 166/207 X [751 Inventor: Paul Wuenschel, filenshawv 5215112 511323 ZYL'EZ?.111I1.... 111:: 1221???? 73 Assignecz Gulf Research & Development 3,175,618 3/l965 Lang et al 166/207 X Company, Pittsburgh, Pa.
[ 1 Filed! J 1972 Primary Examiner-David H. Brown [211 App]. No.: 267,955
Related US. Application Data  Division of Ser. No. 82,907, 0m. 22, 1970, Pat. No. ABSTRACT A reproducible shot hole for geophysical use wherein  US. Cl. 166/207 a deformable metal liner, such as aluminum, 0f prede-  Int. Cl E21b 17/02 termined diameter, wall thickness, and alloy is sel Field of Search u lected, and the annulus between the liner and the hole 166/187, 203;285/4L I133R filled with sand-cement under pressure, so that the l V lined hole will withstand repeated explosions by ex-  v References Cited panding.
UNITED STATES PATENTS r 1,834,946 12/1931 Halliburton 166/285 9 Claims, 4 Drawing Figures REPRODUCIBLE SHOT HOLE APPARATUS This application is a division of my prior copending application Ser. No. 82,907 filed Oct. 22, 1970, entitled Reproducible Shot Hole, assigned to the same assignee as the present invention, and now US. Pat. No. 3,693,717.
This invention pertains to geophysical exploration, particularly seismic exploration. in seismic exploration a reproducible source of elastic waves in the earth, such as is generated by the detonation of a charge of explosives, is highly desirable. In conventional seismic exploration, a hole is drilled, explosives put in the hole, a relatively large array of detectors are placed about the area, and the shot fired. The hole, or the part of the hole where the shot is detonated, is destroyed in the process, so that a shallower level in the same hole must be used, or a new hole must be drilled for the next shot, if a repeat shot is desired. It would be very much preferred to have the ability to fire many charges from one hole at the same depth, with assurance that the waves produced will be substantially the same from shot to shot, while moving a much smaller array of detectors about the area to be explored.
Heretofore, a reproducible shot hole of the character described was completely unknown in the art. If the liner or pipe used to protect the hole was made sufficiently strong to resist expansion from the explosions, then it was found to restrict the radiation of the elastic waves and hence would be a poor source. Onthe other hand, heretofore, if the pipe or liner was made so that it was a good waveradiator, it was not strong enough to stand more than one or a very few shots. The invention provides steps and apparatus to provide a lined shot hole which will expand upon repeated firings of charges while maintaining substantially constant good wave radiation qualities, and yet maintaining freedom of passage so that the next charge can be put in place.
The invention is not to be confused with the many different kinds of surface seismic sources which are presently in use. Such surface types have many advantages, including claimed reproducibility, but all suffer nevertheless from the disadvantage that the waves produced must pass from the surface device, through the weathered layer before passing through the deeper areas of interest. Such surface sources include vehicles which drop heavy weights on the ground, means which vibrate the ground, or means which set off small charges of gas in a bomb or other strong enclosure which is in contact with the surface. The weathered layer is the topmost part of the crust of the earth, varying in thickness according to location, and is highly variable in its ability to transmit elastic waves. The present invention, like conventional seismic exploration, utilizes a shot hole drilled to below the weathered layer which overcomes this disadvantage in surface types in that the source, the explosive charge, is fired at a location below the weathered layer.
Another advantage of the use of dynamite as a seismic source is the ability to excite a specific band of frequencies by the choice of the appropriate charge size and shooting medium. The present invention will apply to a wide range of shooting media consisting of loosely consolidated gravel at one end of the range to a well cemented shale at the other end of the range, and it will accommodate linear charge densities of virtually any size.
Repeat shots from a single hole to a moving relatively small array of detectors produces a result virtually parameters to achieve the final reproducible shot hole.
Examples are set forth in detail in the specification below, but generally the method requires balancing the degree of rigidity, consolidation or hardness of the sur rounding formation with the diameter of and ductility of the liner used to case the shot hole. The invention includes a liner consisting of certain grades of aluminum, and means to protect the junction of the aluminum pipe with the normal steel well casing used to lower the aluminum liner to the area at which the explosions will be detonated. The means of supporting a ductile pipe, such as aluminum, along with means to prevent shearing of the pipe at its ends, are important parts, along with others set forth below, of the method and apparatus of the invention.
The liner can be made of materials other than aluminum. Steel for example, can be used, but the diameters required when shooting in a soft formation would be prohibitive. Aluminum, because of its ductility can be of reasonable dimensions and this is the reason for the preference for liners of the more ductile materials.
The present invention is one of a family of related inventions all pertaining to improvement of the seismic method. The related inventions, all copending with the present invention and allassigned to the same assignee, in addition to the parent application identified above of which the present application is a division, are:
Clamped Detector by Carl A. Gustavson, Emmett B. Shutes and Paul C. Wuenschel, Ser. No. 255,229, filed May 19, 1972 and now US. Pat. No. 3,777,814.
Device for Gripping and lmparting Slack in A Cable by Carl A. Gustavson, Emmett B. Shutes and Paul C. Wuenschel, Ser. No. 256,780, filed May 25, 1972.
Precision Seismology by Paul C. Wuenschel, Ser.
No. 227,985, filed Feb. 22, 1972 and now abandoned.
The invention entitled Precision Seismology identified above is an overall method of using the present invention as well as the other inventions in a single integrated seismic exploration system.
The above and other advantages of the invention will be pointed out or will become evident in the following detailed description and claims, and in the accompanying drawing also forming a part of the disclosure in which: FlG. l is a cross-sectional view through a portion of the earth showing a completed but unfired reproducible shot hole of the invention in place; FIG. 2 is an enlarged view of part of the apparatus of the invention; FIG. 3 is a composite diagrammatic showing of the reproducible shot hole of the invention after a number of shots have been fired and illustrating the configuration of the hole when certain steps in the method are omitted; and FIG. 4 is an accurate chart which summarizes a large amount of experimental 3 work, and which can be used in practicing the invention."
Referring now to'the drawings and in particular to FIG. '1, there is shown a cross-section of the earth in which the shots are to be fired. The method of the invention will be set, forth below in conjunction with the description of HG. 1, it being understood that FIG. 1 shows conditions after the hole has been prepared and is ready to have the first shot fired.
The first step is to determine the nature of formation 10, specifically the rigidity of the rock. This can be determined from previous experience or by drilling a small diameter hole, studying the samples obtained while drilling, observing the drilling rate, and running logs in the hole after drilling. With this information and with knowledge of the seismic frequency band desired, one skilled in the art will know the linear charge density of the explosive required. The linear charge density and the rigidity of the rock together in turn determine the selection of the material for and diameter of the liner 14, which, of course, in turn determines the final hole diameter 12. It is desired to have the liner as snugly fitted in the hole 12 as possible, so-thatthe liner will be supported by the formation.
The general considerations in selecting the liner 14 include that its ductility should be inversely proportional to the degree of consolidation. Restated, the softer the formation, the more ductile the material of the liner. The reason for this relationship is that the liner 14 will expand, more against a softer formation than it will against a harder formation. The invention accommodates to this fact by providing the ability to expand rather than by trying to make the liner so strong that it cannot expand. Heretofore, and in preliminary tests run in conjunction with development of the present invention, it was found that'less ductile materials, such as various grades of steel, promptly burst after one or two explosions because they did not have the ability to expand in response to the explosive force. As is evident, once the liner is burst, the hole quickly fills with debris which enters the hole via the fissure, thus precluding further access to that depth.
Wall thickness of the liner is not crucial when the pipe is supported by a formation, but should be in ratio to the pipe diameter at about 3:100. If the wall is too thin, the pipe will break due to small irregularities in the supporting medium. if it is too thick, the stiffness will limit the radiation efficiency of the explosion. The tolerance on the value given above is believed quite large but has not as yet been established by experiment.
spect to the borehole. Conventional well cement'has been found to be not satisfactory in that it does not have sufficient strength. Accordingly, the invention comprises the use of a sand-cement mixture filling the annulus between the liner l4 and casing 16 and the borehole .12. For the same reason, i.e., stabilizing the borehole, it has been advantageous to squeeze" the sandcement 20 into the annulus. The reason for pressurizing the sand-cement during its placement is to assure that any voids, or small local unconsolidated regions, are filled to provide a uniform strength around liner 14. Such local discontinuities, are caused by, for exampie, gravel streaks in formation 10, sand and the like. Such a weak place is indicated in FIG. 1 by reference numeral 22, and is shown after the squeezing of sandcement 20 as being filled with mixture 20. After setting, the strength of the support around liner 14 will be uniform.
The finai step is locating the charge assembly 24 in the completed reproducible shot hole. Charge assembly 24 comprises, starting at'the lower end, a weight 26 to pull the remainder of the assembly 24 down the hole with the aid of gravity. A cable or other suitable means 28 interconnects weight 26 with the charge 30. The charge 30 may be any explosive normally used in seismic exploration, one such explosive being a type of dynamite sold under the DuPont registered trademark Nitramon" having a strength of 2 pounds per foot. The legends on FIG. 4 indicate the tradenames and strengths of other charges which may be used. The top of charge 30 is connected by a cable 32 to a centralizing sub-assembly 34 comprising upper and lower bow springs 36 interconnected by a support member 38 The cable 32 bridges across the sub-assembly 34 to deliver electricity to the charge. The supporting member 38 is preferably made of wood or other light material since it is desired that it remain intact as it is frequently shot out of the hole upon explosion of charge 30. lt is desired that sub-assembly 34 remain intact so that it can be removed and reused and not hinder placement of the next shot. Further, a hard wood such as maple is preferred to a soft wood such as pine because the latter tends to shatter and the hard wood does not. The use of centralizer sub-assembly 34, or other means to centralize the charge 30 in the hole, is important to successful use of the invention in that if the charge be very much closer to one side of the hole than to the other, that side is more susceptible to bursting. As is conventional, the entire hole may be filled withwater to couple the explosive force to the borehole. Water is readily available and inexpensive, but other fluids such as drilling mud could be used in other circumstances.
Referring now to FlG. 2, the joint protection means 18 are shown in detail. The essence of the manner of protection of the joint between the soft aluminum liner l4 and the hard steel casing 16 is the provision of a tapered sleeve 40 extending from the joint in closely spaced relation to each end of the liner 14 to provide a differential and increasing force from the end coupling 42 at each end of the liner 14 is modified for cooperation with the liner by cutting away part of one set of threads as at 44 and by undercutting the outside of the coupling opposite cut-out 44 as at 46. A taper 47 is provided at the end of undercut 44. Thus, an annular flange 48 is formed between cut-out 44 and undercut 46. A shoulder 50 is formed at the inner end of cut-out 44 against which an end of the liner l4seats. The thick end of sleeve 40 fits in undercut 46 on the outside of flange 48 and is fixed thereto by suitable means such as a bead of welding 52. The assembly of sleeve 40, flange 48, and liner 14 is finally secured together by a row of bolts 54 provided in mating openings in these three members and threaded into the liner 14. The heads of the bolts are preferably of the socket type so that a minimum obstruction is provided on the outside of the sleeve 40. The inside surface 56 of the sleeve is cylin drical, and the outside surface 58 thereof tapers towards surface 56 to provide a thinnest portion of the sleeve at the end thereof. furthest from bolts 54. A clearance space, of roughly the thickness of flange 48, is provided between sleeve 40 and liner 14.
Thus, the joint between the casing string 16 and the liner 14 is protected by virtue of the tapered sleeve 40 in that the liner will have very little additional resistance to expansion opposite the thin end of the sleeve, but that such resistance will gradually increasemoving towards the bolts 54. As will appear more clearly below, absent the sleeve, the liner would simply shear off the coupling on the lower end of casing 16.
During the development of the present invention a relatively large number of tests were run. Initially, these tests were in the nature of feasibility studiesto see if a reproducible shot hole could actually be made and to verify that the deformation produced by several small charges is equivalent to the deformation produced by one large charge whose magnitude is the sum of the small charges. This was found to be true for unsupported pipes by Johnson, ct al., and it was necessary to establish the same relationship for supported pipes. This work is reported in a paper entitled The Explosive Expansion of Unrestrained Tubes by W. Johnson, E. Doege, and F. W. Travis, in the 1964-5 Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 179, Part 1, No. 7, pages 240-256.
After this initial work was successfully completed it was then necessary to evaluate the support provided by various types of wall rock. Two extreme cases as to rigidity were chosen, a loosely consolidated gravel and a well silicified shale whose compressional velocity is 12,000 feet per second. An aluminum pipe of alloy 3003- with a wall thickness to diameter ratio of 0.03 was found to withstand a strain of 180 percent before breaking when expanded with gravel support and was emplaced according to the invention. With this knowledge and data obtained from all experiments conducted in gravel and hard rock it became possible to summarize the design parameters for a viable tool in a single graph, as is reproduced in FIG. 4.
The ordinate in FIG. 4 is the pipe diameter required to permit the desired number of repeat shots at various linear charge densities as given by the abscissa and identified by DuPont tradenames and corresponding weights for a total strain of 180 percent. The parameters used in FIG. 4 are the supporting medium. Loosely consolidated gravel provides the least support while hard rock provides the most support. An intermediate medium of moderately packed gravel lies in between these two curves. Other media such as clay, shale, porous limestone, etc. will yield curves falling between the moderately packed gravel and the hard rock.
' The curves of FIG. 4 are applicable for a strain of 180 percent and pertain to ductile materials like aluminum.
Similar curves can be made for other strains and thereby be applicable to other materials.
Several general principles can be drawn from the specific data presented in FIG. 4, as well as from other tests not included in drawing the curves. Two of these principlesare illustrated in the showing of FIG. 3. After each shot or each few shots the borehole diameter was physically measured with the use of hole calipering tools. The data presented in diagrammatic form in FIG. 3 was taken from these caliper logs. The solid line labeled 60 shows the measured condition of the borehole when the invention was used in a preferred form. The dotted line 62 was run with all conditions the same as in the test indicated by the line 60 with the exception that the sandcement was not put in under pressure. Note that the liner 14 was pushed deep into the loosely consolidated portions of the formation. The liner will burst when the strain exceeds a critical value which depends on the metal used, for aluminum this value is about percent. The final dot-dash line 64 shows the effect of the protection means 18 and the tapered sleeve 40. Absent sleeve 40, the liner promptly shears at its joints with the casing 16. Note the gradual and gentle expansion of the liner over the outer half of each sleeve. As fabricated in the successfully used and tested embodiments of the invention, the sleeve 40 had a length of about 3 feet tapered over only its outer half. The liner 14 had a length of about 20 feet in all tests.
While the invention has been described in detail above, it is to be understood that this detailed description is by way of example only, and the protection granted is to be limited only within the spirit of the invention and the scope'of the following claims.
1. In apparatus for making a reproducible shot hole in the earth, the combination comprising a string of casing which includes a length of shot hole liner to be positioned at the depth at which shots are to be fired; a coupling having means to mount an end of said casing string and an end of said liner therein, a tapered sleeve surrounding the end portion of said liner and having its thickest end at said coupling; and means to join said thick end of said sleeve, the end of said liner, and said coupling together; whereby said liner at said coupling is highly resistant to expansion and decreasingly less resistant to expansion at points on said liner spaced along said sleeve moving away from said coupling.
2. The combination of claim 1, said liner consisting of aluminum.
3. In apparatus for a reproducible shot hole the improvement comprising a string of casing cemented in the shot hole to a depth below the weathered zone at which the shot is to be fired, said string of casing having a cylindrical liner of ductile material through the interval of the hole at which the shot is to be fired, a steel sleeve at each end of the liner surrounding and spaced slightly from the liner and extending from the end of the liner toward the center thereof for a distance to support the ends of the liner and leave the liner unsupported in the interval at which the shot is to be fired.
4. The apparatus of claim 3 in which each of the sleeves is of greatest thickness at the end of the liner and tapers to a reduced thickness at the end of the sleeve nearest the midpoint of the liner.
5. The apparatus of claim 3 in which the liner is in the borehole within a sheath of a cement-sand mixture set under an elevated pressure to fill voids and reinforce weak formations surrounding the liner.
6. Apparatus as set forth in claim 3 in which the liner is aluminum.
7. Apparatus as set forth in claim 3 in which the ratio of the thickness of the liner to its diameter is approximately 3:100.
8. Apparatus for a reproducible shot hole comprising an upper section of steel casing and a lower section of steel casing, an upper coupling at the lower end of the upper section and a lower coupling at the upper end of the lower section, an aluminum liner extending between the upper section and lower section of casing and having its upper end mounted in the upper coupling and its lower end mounted in the lower coupling, an upper sleeve surrounding and secured to the upper coupling and extending therefrom downwardly part of the distance to the lower end of the liner, a lower sleeve surrounding and secured to the lower coupling and extending upwardly therefrom a part of the distance to the lower end of the upper sleeve to leave a central portion of the liner unsurrounded by the sleeve.
9. Apparatus as set forth in claim 8 in which the sleeves taper from a section of maximum thickness at the ends secured to the couplings.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US1834946 *||Nov 15, 1927||Dec 8, 1931||Palmer Halliburton Erle||Method and apparatus for operating wells|
|US2214226 *||Mar 29, 1939||Sep 10, 1940||English Aaron||Method and apparatus useful in drilling and producing wells|
|US2491692 *||Nov 8, 1945||Dec 20, 1949||Shimek Edwin J||Borehole explosive charge|
|US2519116 *||Dec 28, 1948||Aug 15, 1950||Shell Dev||Deformable packer|
|US3175618 *||Nov 6, 1961||Mar 30, 1965||Pan American Petroleum Corp||Apparatus for placing a liner in a vessel|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4036100 *||Jun 7, 1976||Jul 19, 1977||Hercules Incorporated||Apparatus and method for loading fluent explosives in upwardly extending boreholes|
|US6328113||Nov 15, 1999||Dec 11, 2001||Shell Oil Company||Isolation of subterranean zones|
|US6470966||May 7, 2001||Oct 29, 2002||Robert Lance Cook||Apparatus for forming wellbore casing|
|US6497289||Dec 3, 1999||Dec 24, 2002||Robert Lance Cook||Method of creating a casing in a borehole|
|US6557640||Jun 7, 2000||May 6, 2003||Shell Oil Company||Lubrication and self-cleaning system for expansion mandrel|
|US6561227||May 9, 2001||May 13, 2003||Shell Oil Company||Wellbore casing|
|US6568471||Feb 24, 2000||May 27, 2003||Shell Oil Company||Liner hanger|
|US6575240||Feb 24, 2000||Jun 10, 2003||Shell Oil Company||System and method for driving pipe|
|US6575250||Nov 15, 2000||Jun 10, 2003||Shell Oil Company||Expanding a tubular element in a wellbore|
|US6604763||Apr 26, 2000||Aug 12, 2003||Shell Oil Company||Expandable connector|
|US6631759||Feb 12, 2002||Oct 14, 2003||Shell Oil Company||Apparatus for radially expanding a tubular member|
|US6631760||May 9, 2001||Oct 14, 2003||Shell Oil Company||Tie back liner for a well system|
|US6631769||Feb 15, 2002||Oct 14, 2003||Shell Oil Company||Method of operating an apparatus for radially expanding a tubular member|
|US6634431||Oct 3, 2001||Oct 21, 2003||Robert Lance Cook||Isolation of subterranean zones|
|US6640903||Mar 10, 2000||Nov 4, 2003||Shell Oil Company||Forming a wellbore casing while simultaneously drilling a wellbore|
|US6684947||Feb 20, 2002||Feb 3, 2004||Shell Oil Company||Apparatus for radially expanding a tubular member|
|US6705395||Feb 12, 2002||Mar 16, 2004||Shell Oil Company||Wellbore casing|
|US6712154||Oct 18, 2001||Mar 30, 2004||Enventure Global Technology||Isolation of subterranean zones|
|US6725919||Sep 25, 2001||Apr 27, 2004||Shell Oil Company||Forming a wellbore casing while simultaneously drilling a wellbore|
|US6739392||Sep 25, 2001||May 25, 2004||Shell Oil Company||Forming a wellbore casing while simultaneously drilling a wellbore|
|US6745845||Dec 10, 2001||Jun 8, 2004||Shell Oil Company||Isolation of subterranean zones|
|US6758278||Sep 25, 2001||Jul 6, 2004||Shell Oil Company||Forming a wellbore casing while simultaneously drilling a wellbore|
|US6823937||Feb 10, 2000||Nov 30, 2004||Shell Oil Company||Wellhead|
|US6857473||Mar 7, 2002||Feb 22, 2005||Shell Oil Company||Method of coupling a tubular member to a preexisting structure|
|US6892819||Sep 25, 2001||May 17, 2005||Shell Oil Company||Forming a wellbore casing while simultaneously drilling a wellbore|
|US6966370||Feb 20, 2002||Nov 22, 2005||Shell Oil Company||Apparatus for actuating an annular piston|
|US6968618||May 12, 2003||Nov 29, 2005||Shell Oil Company||Expandable connector|
|US6976541||Jan 22, 2003||Dec 20, 2005||Shell Oil Company||Liner hanger with sliding sleeve valve|
|US7011161||Oct 1, 2002||Mar 14, 2006||Shell Oil Company||Structural support|
|US7036582||Oct 1, 2002||May 2, 2006||Shell Oil Company||Expansion cone for radially expanding tubular members|
|US7040396||Feb 20, 2002||May 9, 2006||Shell Oil Company||Apparatus for releasably coupling two elements|
|US7044218||Oct 1, 2002||May 16, 2006||Shell Oil Company||Apparatus for radially expanding tubular members|
|US7044221||Feb 20, 2002||May 16, 2006||Shell Oil Company||Apparatus for coupling a tubular member to a preexisting structure|
|US7048062||Oct 1, 2002||May 23, 2006||Shell Oil Company||Method of selecting tubular members|
|US7055608||Apr 18, 2003||Jun 6, 2006||Shell Oil Company||Forming a wellbore casing while simultaneously drilling a wellbore|
|US7063142||Feb 15, 2002||Jun 20, 2006||Shell Oil Company||Method of applying an axial force to an expansion cone|
|US7077213||Oct 1, 2002||Jul 18, 2006||Shell Oil Company||Expansion cone for radially expanding tubular members|
|US7100684||Dec 18, 2002||Sep 5, 2006||Enventure Global Technology||Liner hanger with standoffs|
|US7100685||Jun 13, 2003||Sep 5, 2006||Enventure Global Technology||Mono-diameter wellbore casing|
|US7108061||Oct 25, 2002||Sep 19, 2006||Shell Oil Company||Expander for a tapered liner with a shoe|
|US7108072||Mar 5, 2003||Sep 19, 2006||Shell Oil Company||Lubrication and self-cleaning system for expansion mandrel|
|US7121352||Jul 14, 2003||Oct 17, 2006||Enventure Global Technology||Isolation of subterranean zones|
|US7159665||Jul 19, 2002||Jan 9, 2007||Shell Oil Company||Wellbore casing|
|US7172024||Mar 31, 2003||Feb 6, 2007||Shell Oil Company||Mono-diameter wellbore casing|
|US7455104 *||May 30, 2001||Nov 25, 2008||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Expandable elements|
|US7665532||Oct 19, 2007||Feb 23, 2010||Shell Oil Company||Pipeline|
|US7712522||Apr 3, 2007||May 11, 2010||Enventure Global Technology, Llc||Expansion cone and system|
|US7739917||Aug 18, 2003||Jun 22, 2010||Enventure Global Technology, Llc||Pipe formability evaluation for expandable tubulars|
|US7740076||Mar 4, 2003||Jun 22, 2010||Enventure Global Technology, L.L.C.||Protective sleeve for threaded connections for expandable liner hanger|
|US7775290||Apr 15, 2004||Aug 17, 2010||Enventure Global Technology, Llc||Apparatus for radially expanding and plastically deforming a tubular member|
|US7793721||Mar 11, 2004||Sep 14, 2010||Eventure Global Technology, Llc||Apparatus for radially expanding and plastically deforming a tubular member|
|US7819185||Aug 12, 2005||Oct 26, 2010||Enventure Global Technology, Llc||Expandable tubular|
|US7886831||Aug 6, 2007||Feb 15, 2011||Enventure Global Technology, L.L.C.||Apparatus for radially expanding and plastically deforming a tubular member|
|US7918284||Mar 31, 2003||Apr 5, 2011||Enventure Global Technology, L.L.C.||Protective sleeve for threaded connections for expandable liner hanger|
|US7946359 *||Dec 6, 2006||May 24, 2011||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Methods and apparatus for well construction|
|US20020040787 *||Sep 25, 2001||Apr 11, 2002||Cook Robert Lance||Forming a wellbore casing while simultaneously drilling a wellbore|
|US20030094278 *||Oct 1, 2002||May 22, 2003||Shell Oil Co.||Expansion cone for radially expanding tubular members|
|US20030094279 *||Oct 1, 2002||May 22, 2003||Shell Oil Co.||Method of selecting tubular members|
|US20030116325 *||Dec 18, 2002||Jun 26, 2003||Cook Robert Lance||Liner hanger with standoffs|
|US20030173090 *||Mar 5, 2003||Sep 18, 2003||Shell Oil Co.||Lubrication and self-cleaning system for expansion mandrel|
|US20030233524 *||Jun 12, 2002||Dec 18, 2003||Poisner David I.||Protected configuration space in a protected environment|
|US20040045718 *||Jan 22, 2003||Mar 11, 2004||Brisco David Paul||Liner hanger with sliding sleeve valve|
|US20050098323 *||Apr 18, 2003||May 12, 2005||Shell Oil Co.||Forming a wellbore casing while simultaneously drilling a wellbore|
|US20090178809 *||Dec 6, 2006||Jul 16, 2009||Benjamin Jeffryes||Methods and Apparatus for Well Construction|
|US20100193126 *||Jun 2, 2008||Aug 5, 2010||Arild Saasen||Method of cementing aluminium objects|
|WO2008146011A2 *||Jun 2, 2008||Dec 4, 2008||Statoilhydro Asa||Well cementing methods|
|WO2008146011A3 *||Jun 2, 2008||Jan 22, 2009||Statoilhydro Asa||Well cementing methods|
|WO2008146015A1 *||Jun 2, 2008||Dec 4, 2008||Statoilhydro Asa||Method of cementing aluminium objects|
|International Classification||G01V1/104, G01V1/02, E21B33/13, E21B43/10, E21B17/00, E21B43/02, E21B33/14|
|Cooperative Classification||G01V1/104, E21B43/103, E21B17/00, E21B33/14|
|European Classification||E21B43/10F, E21B17/00, G01V1/104, E21B33/14|
|May 5, 1986||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: CHEVRON RESEARCH COMPANY, SAN FRANCISCO, CA. A COR
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:GULF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A CORP. OF DE.;REEL/FRAME:004610/0801
Effective date: 19860423
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GULF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A CORP. OF DE.;REEL/FRAME:004610/0801