|Publication number||US3814968 A|
|Publication date||Jun 4, 1974|
|Filing date||Feb 11, 1972|
|Priority date||Feb 11, 1972|
|Also published as||CA970821A1, DE2306149A1|
|Publication number||US 3814968 A, US 3814968A, US-A-3814968, US3814968 A, US3814968A|
|Inventors||H Nathanson, R Thomas, J Guldberg|
|Original Assignee||Lucas Industries Ltd|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (70), Classifications (29)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
United States Patent [191 Nathanson et al.
SOLID STATE RADIATION SENSITIVE FIELD ELECTRON EMITTER AND METHODS OF FABRICATION THEREOF  Inventors: Harvey C. Nathanson, Pittsburgh;
Richard N. Thomas, Murrysville; Jens Guldberg, Penn Hills, all of Pa.
 Assignee: Joseph Lucas, (lndustries) Limited,
Birmingham, England  Filed: Feb. 11, 1972 [211 App]. No.: 225,517
 US. Cl 313/95, 313/96, 313/105, 313/309, 313/351  Int. Cl H01j 39/06, HOlj 39/16  Field of Search 313/94, 95, 96, 103, 104,
 References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,466,485 9/1969 Arthur, Jr. et al 3l3/95 3,665,24l 5/]972 Spindt et al 313/309 X Primary Examiner-Herman Karl Saalbach Assistant Examiner-Siegfried H. Grimm Attorney, Agent, or FirmF. H. Henson  ABSTRACT A solid state radiation sensitive field emitter cathode comprising a single crystal semiconductor member having a body portion with a uniform array of closely spaced and very sharp electron emitting projections from one surface in the form of needles or whisker like members. Electrons are emitted into vacuum when a planar-parallel positive anode is mounted in close proximity to the surface. The cathode is responsive to input radiation such as electrons or light directed onto the cathode in modifying the electron emission from the array of electron emitter projections. The method of manufacturing the cathode by providing a predetermined pattern or mosaic of islands of a material exhibiting a greater etch resistant property than the semiconductor material, on a wafer of a semiconductor material and then etching'out between and beneath the islands to undercut to a point where the islands are supported by only a small whisker of the semiconductor material. Removal of the islands results in an electron emitter being exposed from beneath each island wherein carriers generated within the body portion and also carriers generated within the depletion regions of the tips diffuse to the electron emitter projections wherein establishment of a high electric field at the tips of the electron emitter projections results in electron emission primarily due to conduction band tunneling. The device provides about 10 emitting points of close proximity so as to effect photographic-like imaging.
13 Claims, 22 Drawing Figures 2.5no' cm +4 PATENTEDJUH 4 1914 smunr? Pm'mmm 4mm 33141968.
SHEET 2 0f 7 CONDUCTION BAND TUNNELI N6 PA TENTEU 4 I974 QUANTUM YIELD ELECTRONS/ INCIDENT PHOTON SHEET 0F 7 VFIG.I7
WAVELENGTH MICRONS PATENTEBJuu 4:914
J AMPS JAMPS" REGION 3 SHEET 5 BF 7 REGION 2 lO'bHM CM P TYPE (III) ANODE SPACING .254 mm ACTIVATION ENERGYY= 0.56 eV EGAP/Z FIG. 20
PA'TB'NTEDJUM 4 m4 J-AMPS d-AMPS $814,968 sum 6 0F 7 IO OHM CM PTYPE (III) ANODE SPACING .508 cm FIG. I9
I60 OHM CM PTYPEUIH TEMP 90K PATENTEDJIIII 4 IIIII PHOTO CURRENT 3814.968 SHEET 7 IF 7 F-N LIMITED REGIME RADIATION=I.O6;L
I60 OHM CM P TYPE (III) I I l l l I .OOOOI .OOOI .OOI .Ol .I I
FILTER TRANSMISSION INPUT LIGHT FLUX, ARBITRARY UNITS SOLID STATE RADIATION SENSITIVE FIELD ELECTRON EMITTER AND METHODS OF FABRICATION THEREOF BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates generally to cold cathode field electron emitters and more particularly to those of the type where the emitter is responsive to input radiation such as electrons, X-rays or light and particularly radiations in the infrared regions.
Photoemissive type devices are well known in the art and the most common are the tri-alkali antimonides These structures are sensitive in the visible spectral region but lack sensitivity in the infrared region. In the last few years, a new type of photoemitter known as the III-V compound .semiconductor has provided improved sensitivity in the infrared region. These photoemitters rely on the use of monolayer coatings of Cs and C 0. They suffer disadvantages of requiring high temperature processing and very good operating vacuum. Silicon point arrays have neither of these disadvantages. Field emission type cathodes in which emission occurs in response to an intense electric field are also known. In the last few years work has been done utilizing semiconductors such as silicon with a plurality of whiskers provided thereon and which is sensitive to light. Such a device is described in US. Pat. No. 3,466,485 by John R. Arthur, et al. Experimental results on single emitter tips are also reported in an article entitled .Photo-Field-Emission from High Resistance Silicon and Germanium by P. G. Borzyak, et al, on page 403, Phys. Stat. Sol. 14,403 (1966). The photo-field-emitting type emitter provides a very sensitive type device.- The Arthur, et al, arrays are made using a vapourliquid-solid growth mechanism using gold to seed whisker growth. As a result, the Arthur, et al, device has thewhisker points saturated with gold which is a most effective lifetime-killer. For good photoresponse, high lifetime is essential Because of poor lifetime, the light in the Arthur, et al, device must be directed onto the very tip of the semiconducting points. The prior art teaching has thus failed to recognize or fabricate a device capable of utilizing its full potential. The prior art activity appears to have been mostly in the area of experimentation and has failed to 1 bring forth a device for commercial utilization. The present invention is directed to improved structures and fabrication methods to accomplish improvements over the prior art teaching.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a radiation-sensitive field-emissive cathode wherein an-array of electron emitting projections is provided on one surface of a wafer of a suitable semiconductive material such as P-type silicon of ohm cm and greater resistivity. Radiation is directed onto the wafer from theopposite surface with respect to the electron emitter array and carriers are generated within about a 100 micrometers of the emitter tips and diffuse to the emitter tips where they are emitted into the vacuum. The method'of fabricating the electron emitter array on a wafer of a semiconductive material utilizes photoresist techniques to delineate a predetermined pattern .or mosaic of islands of etch-resistant material on the surface of the wafer, followed by etching away the material of the wafer between and beneath the islands until only a needle-like projection member remains below each island. These islands may then be removed to expose a semiconductive emitting device with an array of needle-like projections formed of the original wafer. This fabrication technique retains the high crystalline perfection of the starting semiconductor material within the structure to ensure that high carrier lifetime is maintained and thereby providing long diffusion paths (about 25 to 250 micrometers) for the carriers. Also noredistribution of impurities can occur in this room temperature process. The improved structure also provides surface regions and coating on surfaces of the semiconductor wafer to enhance sensitivity by increasing absorption of input radiation, reduced loss of input radiation produces generated carriers and minimizes dark current generation.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS For a better understanding of the invention, reference may be had to the preferred embodiments, exemplary of the invention, shown in the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a schematic view of an image intensifier incorporating a photocathode in accordance with the teachings of this invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic showing of a camera tube incorporating a photocathode and an electron multiplier in accordance with the teachings of this invention;
7 FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the photocathode in FIGS. 1 and 2 illustrating the electron emitter array.
FIG. 4 is a side view of one of electron emitting projections of the array illustrated in FIG. 3;
FIGS. 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 illustrate steps in the manufacture of the photocathode illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2;
FIG. 10 illustrates another embodiment of the electron emitting projection array cathode for use in FIGS. 1 and2;
FIGS. ll, 12 and I3 illustrate steps in the manufacture of the device shown in FIG. I0;
FIG. 14 illustrates a further embodiment of the invention illustrating an electron emitter projection array cathode for use in FIGS. 1 and 2;
FIGS. 15A and 15B illustrate respectively an electron emitter projection of the present invention, and an energy band diagram, which facilitates understanding the mechanism of operation of the electron emitters of the present invention.
FIG. 16 illustrates an experimental Fowler-Nordheim plot of log J. V. IN anode for P-type silicon, 10 ohm cm(lll)-emitter array at room temperature for the photocathode shown in FIG. 1;
FIG. 17 illustrates the response of the prior art structures in comparison with the silicon field emitter array;
FIG. 18 illustrates the emission characteristics of 160 ohm cm p-type l l l) silicon field emitter array at K in the dark and at different intensities of 1.06 micron radiation inputs;
FIG. 19 illustrates the dark emission characteristics of a 10 ohm cm p-type l l l) silicon field emitter array at different temperatures;
. FIG. 20 is an Arrhenius plot of data shown in FIG. 19, and
FIG. 21 illustrates a plot of a photocathode response to input light.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Referring to FIGS. 1, 3 and 4, there is illustrated an image intensifier device including an evacuated envelope having an input window 18 and an output window 24. A photocathode 12 in accordance with the teachings of this invention is provided on the inner surface of the input window 18. Suitable cooling means 19 is provided about the photocathode 12 to control the temperature thereof. It may be necessary in some applications to reduce the dark current due to thermal generation. An output screen 14 is provided on the inner surface of the output window 24. The screen 14 comprises a layer 20 of suitable phosphor material which emits radiation in response to electron bombardment. An electrical conductive coating 22 of a suitable material such as aluminum may be provided on the inner surface of the layer 20. The layer 22 provides not only an electrical connection but is also opaque to and prevents radiation from the phosphor screen 20 being directed back on to the photocathode 12.
An extractor grid electrode 27 is provided between the photocathode 12 and the output screen 14. The electrode 27 is a mesh of electrically conductive material and about 50 to 80 per cent transmissive. The extractor electrode 27 is also sufficiently rigid to prevent distortion due to electrical fields. The extractor electrode 27 should be spaced such a distance as to provide adequate electrical field to cause field emission from the photocathode 12. The electrode 27 may be spaced at a distance of about 250 micrometers from the photocathode 12. A suitable potential provided by a battery 26 of about 5,000 volts is connected between the photocathode l2 and the extractor electrode 27. The electrical contact to the photocathode 12 is made by means of a P+ region 15. The output screen 14 may be positioned at a distance of about 250 micrometers from the extractor electrode 27 to provide a variable accelerating potential to accelerate the electrons to the output screen 14. A variable potential source 29 is connected between the output screen 14 and the extractor electrode 27. The variable potential source 29 provides means of varying the output brightness of the device. The extractor electrode 27 may be omitted in some applications and the output electrode 14 will provide a simultaneous extraction and acceleration potential.
The photocathode 12 is of a suitable semiconductor material such as a silicon, germanium, III-V compounds and ternary Ill-V compound semiconductors. Elemental semiconductors with deep impurity levels such as, silicon doped with gold could also be used. The specific embodiment utilizes P-type silicon material having a resistivity of 0.1 to 160 ohm cm. The photocathode 12 is fabricated from a single crystal wafer. The photocathode 12 comprises a body portion 11 having a thickness of about 25 micrometers. An array 16 of a plurality of projections 13 projects from the body portion 11 to a height of about 12 micrometers. The spacing between the emitting projections 13 may be about 25 micrometers, with the substrate thickness being less than about 500 micrometers, and the diameter of the tip of the projections 13 may be less than 1 micrometer. In the specific device, the diameter of the tips was about 0.5 micrometers. The base of the emitting projection 13 may be about 25 micrometers. The P+ region 15 is provided on surface of the body portion 11 remote to the array 16. A photocathode of 3.2 cm in diameter may have as many as 1.25 X 10 projection emitters 13.
The general principles of operation of this device are best'understood with reference to FIGS. 15A, 15B, l6, 18, 19, 20 and 21. Electrons are emitted from the sharp point or tip of the emitter projections 13 when placed in close proximity to a positively biased extractor electrode 27 as shown in FIG. 15A, due to the field intensification at the tip. At low applied extractor voltages, electrons are emitted from the conduction band of the silicon. The emission is well-described by the Fowler- Nordheim tunneling theory which results in a linear log current vs inverse voltage relationship as shown in region l of FIG. 16. At higher applied anode voltages, which are sufficient to overcome shielding effects of surface charge states, penetration of the electric field into the semiconductor tip can occur. A space-charge region which is essentially depleted of mobile carriers is therefore created at the tip of the emitter 13. As a result, it is observed that the log current vs inverse voltage plot assumes a lesser slope as shown in region 2 of FIG. 16, since the supply of electrons in the conduction band at the surface available for emission is limited. In this source-limited mode of operation, the device is sensitive to input radiation, such as photons or incident electrons, which alters the electron population in the conduction band'and thereby increases the emission current. In detail, operation thus depends upon the formation of electron-hole pair by the input radiation within the space-charge region at the tip of the emitter 13 and/or within a diffusion length in the bulk p-region of the emitter 13 and body 11. Electrons generated within this bulk p-region diffuse into the space-charge region. Because of the built-in electric field within the space-charge region, electrons created or diffusing into this region, are therefore swept to the tip of the emitter 13 from whence they are emitted. In the case of input radiation consisting of photons, each absorbed photon generates an average of one electron-hole pair. With electrons incident on the device however, each incident electron creates one electron-hole pair per 3.5 eV energy on the average. Substantial electron gains are therefore possible with energetic electrons, e.g. IOKeV electrons result in gains of 2,000.
The dark current emission characteristics shown in FIG. 19 is of an unpassivated photocathode and indicates that the dark current is substantially reduced at operating temperatures below room temperature. Furthermore, the dependence of dark current of the device shown in FIG. 20 yields an activation energy of 0.5 6eV. This value of activation energy which is equal to onehalf of the band gap energy of silicon indicates unambiguously that terminal generation via mid-gap bulk and surface states is the source of dark current in the device. Thus, substantial reductions in the dark current are possible with the application of well-known oxide passivation and gettering techniques to the device.
In FIG. 18, a family of curves for different values of light at a wavelength of 1.06 microns is shown with the temperature held at K.
The extended source-limited behaviour observed at the lowest light levels and the fact that the photocurrent remains approximately constant over a range of applied anode voltages is of considerable interest. During fabrication, small variations in tip diameter and height of the emitter projections 13 within an array 16 may occur. Small variations in the electric field at the tips of individual emitter 13 would therefore occur when this array is operated at constant anode voltage. However, due to the relative insensitivity of the photocurrent to changes in the electric field in the sourcecontrolled mode, the emitted photocurrent from each emitter should be constant. In other words, certain nonuniformities of the point emitter dimensions can be tolerated without affecting the photoemission uniformity.
In FIG. 21 the linearity between photocurrent and illumination level over five orders of magnitude is shown and corresponds to y 1. Saturation is determined by the eventual changeover to tunneling-limited emission at high light-flux levels. The light level at which saturation occurs can be preset by proper choice of the applied anode voltage, and can be used to minimize blooming of bright elements in an otherwise dimly illuminated scene.
In FIG. 2, there is illustrated a pick-up tube which again utilizes the photocathode 12 as described with respect to FIGS. 1, 3 and 4. The pick-up tube comprises an evacuated envelope 30 having an input window 18 of a suitable material transmissive to input radiation such as borosilicate glass or quartz. The photocathode is disposed thereon. Suitable cooling means 19 is also provided.- The electron emitter array 16 of the photocathode 12 is remote to the input window 18 and the electron emitting array 16 faces an electron multiplying electrode 33. The electrode 33 may be fabricated in same manner and of similar structure as the photocathode 12. The photocathode 12 may be operated at a potential of about 10,000 volts negative with respect to ground and is provided by a suitable potential source 32. The spacing between the multiplier electrode 33 and photocathode 12 may be about 250 micrometers. The potential on the electrode 33 may be about 5,000 volts negative with respect to ground and is provided by a suitable potential source 34. The multiplier electrode 33 is identical to the photocathode l2 and is responsive to electron bombardment. With the potentials shown, one may obtain an output of about 500 electrons from the emitting array surface of the electrode 33. in response to each incident electron emittedfrom the photocathode 12. A target electrode 39 is provided adjacent the emitting array surface of the electrode 33 and may be of any suitable target material which exhibits the property of storage of charge in response to electron bombardment. The target 39 may be of "any suitable type such as described in US. Pat. No. 3,440,476 by M. H. Crowell or of the type in US. Pat. No. 3,213,316 by G. Goetze, et al.
An electron gun 36 is provided at the opposite end of the envelope with respect to the target structure 39 and directs a scanning electron beam over the target member 39 to read out the charge image in a wellknown manner. This output signal is derived across an output resistor 38 of the target electrode 39. The electrode 39 may be operated at a potential of about 10 volts positive with respect to ground by means of a battery 41. The cathode of electron gun 36 may be operated at a potential of about ground.
Input radiations directed onto the photocathode l2 generate an electron image corresponding to the input radiations. This electron image is accelerated into the electrode 33 wherein the electron bombardment generates charge carriers causing the field electron emission from the emitter array surface of the electrode 33. These electrons are accelerated into incidence on the target electrode 39. By providing the electrode 33 between the photocathode 12 and the target 39, amplification of the input signal is obtained. The target 39 provides the necessary extraction potential for the electrode 33.
A method of fabricating the photocathode 12 or the electrode 33 is illustrated in FIGS. 5 through 9. The A figures are top view and the B figures are side views. A wafer 43 of a suitable p-type semiconductor such as silicon, germanium, gallium arsenicle or other III-V semiconductor compounds including tertiaries such as gallium-indium-arsenide and indium-arsenide phosphide and having band gaps from 0.2 electron volt up to 3.0 electron volts may be utilized. The wafer 43 should be of a single crystal and have a suitable crystal orientation to provide the desired structure after etch. Crystal orientation of (111) and have been utilized. One specific example is a 10 ohm centimeter ptype 1 l l silicon wafer having a thickness of about 25 to 50 micrometers. The wafer 43 may be cut fromingots grown by the Csochralski or float-zone methods.
The first step in the operation is to oxidize the wafer 43 on one surface to provide an oxide coating 42 as illustrated in FIG. 6. The coating 42 should be about I micrometer in thickness. The oxide coating 42 may be provided by well-known techniques such as treating the wafer in a wet oxygen atmosphere at a temperature at about 1,100C for about 2 to 3 hours. The next step in the operation is to provide a photoresist material coating on top of the silicon dioxide layer 42 and then expose with radiation through an aperture mask and then remove the undesired portions of the photoresist coating. The photoresist technique is well known in the art and one may spin on about .7 micrometers of a suitable photoresist such as Positop and then expose with ultraviolet radiation and wash to provide a pattern of islands 41 of photoresist similar to the pattern shown in FIG. 7. The silicon dioxide coating 42 is then removed from the uncovered regions by a suitable etch such as buffered hydrofluoric acid etch (ammonium fluoride and hydrofluoric acid in 6:1 proportions) and then the unsoluble photoresist is removed from the islands 41 to provide a pattern of silicon dioxide islands 41 as illustrated in FIG. 7. The islands 41 are circular and may have a diameter of about 20 micrometers and are spaced apart on centers by about 25 micrometers.
The next step in the operation is a P+ diffusion into the back surface of the wafer 43. This is a well-known technique and may be accomplished by exposing the wafer 43 to boron bromide BBr at 950C for a few minutes. The P+ layer 15 thus formed prevents or minimizes loss of radiation-generated carriers at the back surface due to recombination as well as provide an electrical contact. The next step in the operation is to rotate etch in a suitable etch such as 25 parts nitric acid, 10 parts acetic acid and one part hydrofluoric acid at 6.0 revolutions per minute using 50 cc of etch. This etch should be continued for about 20 minutes or until the tip dimensions of less than 0.5 micrometers have been acheived. Etching is stopped by quenching with water followed by rinsing first in water and then in methanol. The PI- layer 15 on the back surface is masked in this operation. Other suitable etchants for silicon are found in INTEGRATED SILICON DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, Volume X, Research Triangle Institute, Durham NC, November 1965. The resulting structure is shown in FIG. 8 and illustrates the formation of the array 16 of projections 13 on the body portion 11 of the photocathode. The silicon dioxide islands 41 may then be removed by etching in buffered hydrofluoric acid etch and then rinsing in water, methanol and then drying.
An optional next step is to provide a passivating coating 9 of silicon dioxide having a thickness of about 50 to 75 angstroms on the point array surface 16. The coating 9 may be formed by thermal growth in wet or dry oxygen at 600C for several hours. The structure is then subjected to annealing in hydrogen at 350 to 450C for l to 2 hours. The wafer can then be gettered. The completed photocathode 12 is then secured to the face plate 18. The resulting structure is shown in H0. 9. It is obvious that the islands 41 may be formed by other methods and may be of different shapes.
The resulting structure provides a crystallographically continuous connection between the body portion 11 and the projections 13. That is the crystal perfection and low level of contaminating impurities is continuous throughout the body or substrate 11 and the projections 13. This is in contrast to prior art methods which incorporate processing techniques that result in large concentrations of contaminating impurities in the tips of the projections. The high concentration of the impurities are difficult to remove by standard gettering techniques. Because of the internal crystalline perfection and the smooth external surface resulting from the etch process, high effective lifetimes of minority carriers in the body 11 and projections 13 accrue. Bulk lifetimes of greater than I microsecond are obtained in the body 11 and projections 13. The efficiency of collection of minority carriers is much greater than would accrue in prior art lll-V photoemitters. lll-V photoemitters require heavily doped P+ regions to maintain net surface negative electron affinity. Heavily doped P+ substrates usually have lifetimes in the nanoseconds regions, a factor of 1,000 below that of the present invention. Thus, a 30 fold increase in collection depth of photocreated minority carriers is afforded with subsequent increases of efficiency of that order. It must be recognized that a high lifetime tip by itself would not provide adequate cross sectional area for efficient creation of carriers due to input light images. It is the combination of high lifetime emitting points crystallographically continuously fabricated on a high lifetime substrate region of significant thickness which provides for the extremely high efficiencies of this invention. Carriers created deep within the body 11 are because of high internal lifetime of the body capable of diffusing out to and along the length of the tip region where they are subsequently emitted. Thus, the efficiency is limited only by resolution degradation associated with inordinately thick targets.
lt is also possible to provide a self-supporting structure by starting with a silicon wafer having a thickness of about 250 micrometers and diameters of 3.2 cm and then etching out a central region of this wafer of diameter of 2.5 cm to the desired thickness of about 25 micrometers and then proceeding with the steps illustrated in FIGS. through 9. The resulting structure is a thin diaphragm of silicon with a supporting ring thereabout having a thickness of about 250 micrometers. In this manner the thin silicon wafer may be supported for utilization as a transmission type electron multiplier in which electrons are directed onto one surface and electrons are emitted from the opposite surface thereof.
Referring to FIG. 10, another embodiment is shown. The photocathode is similar to that previously described but included an oxide coating 55 on the emitter array 16. The fabrication of the device is illustrated in FIGS. 11 and 13. A wafer 43 having a thickness of about 25 to micrometers is provided. A coating 52 of silicon nitride SiN is provided on one surface of the wafer 43. The thickness of the coating is about 0.2 micrometers and may be deposited by the ammonolysis of silane at 700900C for about 20 minutes.
The next step is to provide a coating 54 of silicon dioxide of a thickness of about 0.2 micrometers. The coating 54 may be thermally grown by heating the wafer in dry or wet oxygen at l,l00C or may be deposited by thermal decompositionof silane or oxygen at 600700C. A photoresist coating is then placed on the coating 54, exposed and a mosaic of islands of photoresist of a similar pattern shown in HO. 7 is obtained.
The unprotected portion of the coating 54 is then removed by a suitable etch such as buffered hydrofluoric acid and then the unprotected coating 52 is removed by etching in hot phosphoric acid to provide the structure shown in FIG. 1] and with the pattern similar to that shown in FIG. 7. At this stage the remaining oxide pattern can be removed if required. The silicon wafer 43 is then etched using a nitric, acetic and hydrofluoric acids mixture as previously described. Rather than etching the points down to about 0.5 micrometers, the etch is stopped when the point diameter is about 1.5 micrometers. This structure is shown in FIG. 12. The next step is to provide the oxide coating 55 on the array surface. The oxide coating 55 is formed by thermal oxidation. The use of thermal oxidation in forming the oxide coating 55 serves several advantageous functions in this embodiment. The thermal oxidation which proceeds in a slow and well-controlled manner enables the silicon points to be reduced in diameter in a similar manner. If necessary, the tip diameter could be trimmed to the required dimensions by repeated oxidation and oxide-removal steps. In the specific device illustrated the 1.5 micrometer diameter tip would be reduced to a 0.5 mm. tip intimately surrounded by 1.0 micrometer oxide coating. This is shown in FIG. 13. Upon removal of the nitride islands 52 the emitter points consist of a clean 0.5 micrometer diameter silicon core surrounded by a 1.0 mm. thick oxide coating. The oxide-coated array with islands in place can be annealed in hydrogen at 450C. The nitride islands are then removed and the oxide coating +H anneal provides a means of passivating the surface to substantially reduce background dark current in the device. The final structure is illustrated in FIG. 10.
FIG. 14 illustrates another embodiment, prior to removal of the islands 50 a layer 58 of suitable electrical conductive material such as gold having the thickness of about 0.1 micrometers can be evaporated at about 60 angle to cover the passivation layer 55 but not touching the tip as is illustrated in FIG. 14. The reflective layer 58 provides means of enhancing the sensitivity of the wafer to input radiations through internal reflection. In addition, the layer 58 provides means of applying an electrical potential across the front emitting area of the photocathode which may be utilized to enhance the field involved at the top of the emitter projections and also used for gating or modulating the emission.
In FIG. 16 there is shown an F-N plot of a typical device. The linearity of this plot at low anode voltages indicates that the emission is Fowler-Nordheim limited. The tendency of the curve to saturate for a high anode voltages indicates the beginning of the source-limited mode of operation. In this case, the high dark current is being provided by the high surface and bulk generation in the ungettered and unpassivated type assemblies. However even in this low lifetime [nongettered] specimen, a reflection photoemissive sensitivity exceeding 1,500 microamperes per lumen was observed. This is practically equivalent to the value of the 1,650 microamperes per lumen reported in the literature for certain lll-V compound emitters. 1t must be emphasized that over 50,000 points were simultaneously and uniformly emitting.
H0. 17 indicates the response of the photocathode as described herein by curve 70 with respect to wavelength of input radiation. Curve 71 is a typical S photocathode and curve 72 is a typical S--l photocathode.
It should be noted that this particular method of fabrication described herein not only lends itself to the manufacture of transmissive type structures, that is, where light or energy is directed on one side and emission from the opposite side but also these techniques may be utilized to fabricate devices wherein the illumination is directed onto the same surface as the electron emission array. 1n addition, the techniques may be utilized to fabricate conventional cold field emitters whether made up of semiconductive materials or metals.
1n the specific embodiment illustrated, the mosaic of resist material is made up of a plurality of circular islands. lt is obvious that these islands may be of any desirable shape such as square or rectangular. in addition, the type of crystal orientation definitely affects the density of the emitter projections and it was found that the (111) and (110) were particularly desirable.
We claim as our invention:
1. A cold cathode field emitter device comprising a single crystalline wafer member of semiconductor material having a minority carrier lifetime of greater than 1 microsecond, said wafer member including a substrate body member having an array of closely spaced non-growth projections extending from one surface of said body member, said substrate body member and said projections being crystallographically continuous, and said projections having tip diameters of less than 1.0 micron.
2. The device set forth in claim 1 in which said crystalline wafer is a silicon p-type material having a crystallographic orientation of (111).
3. The device set forth in claim 2, in which said silicon p-type material has a resistivity of greater than 0.1 ohm centimeter.
4. The structure set forth in claim 1 in which said wafer is provided with a P+ region on the opposite surface with respect to the surface from which the projections extend.
5. The structure set forth in claim 1 in which a passivating coating is provided on the opposite surface of said wafer with respect to said projection array and a passivation coating is provided on the projection array surface intermediate the tips of said projections.
6. The device set forth in claim 1 in which an electrically conductive coating is provided on the projection array surface of said wafer intermediate the emitting tips of said projections.
7. The device set forth in claim 1 in which said body member has thickness of about 25 micrometers and the height of said projection emitters is about 12 micrometers.
' 8. The device set forth in claim 1, in which said substrate body member has a thickness of from about 25 to 500 micrometers, and said non-growth projections extend from said substrate body member for a height of less than about 50 micrometers whereby charge carriers'created throughout the substrate body member will diffuse out to and along said projections for emis' sion.
9. The device as set forth in claim 1, wherein the density of said projections is about 1.5 X 10 projections per square millimeter.
10. The device specified in claim 1, wherein the semiconductive material is radiation sensitive.
11. The device set forth in claim 10, in which said radiation sensitive cold cathode field emitter device is utilized as a photocathode element in an image sensor device.
12. A radiation sensitive cold cathode field emitter device comprising a single crystalline wafer member of semiconductive material, said wafer member including a substrate body member having a thickness of from about 25 to 500 micrometers, and having an array of closely spaced substantially impurity free projections extending from the'surface of said body member to a height of less than about 50 micrometers, with the minority carrier lifetime of the device being greater than about one microsecond, said substrate body member and said projections being crystallographically continuous and said projections having tip diameters of less than 1.0 micron.
13. The device specified in claim 12, wherein the closely spaced projections are spaced at about 1.5 X
10 projections per square millimeter.
UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION PATENT NO. 3,81 t,968
DATED 1 June 1, 197 4 INVENTOR(5) 1 Harvey C. Nathanson,.Richard N. Thomas and Jens Guldberg It is certified that error appears in the above-identified patent and that said Letters Patent are hereby corrected as shown below:
Column 1, lines 7 and 8, cancel " Assignee: Joseph Lucas, (Industries) Limited, Birmingham, England" and substitute  Assignee: Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Signed and Scaled this second D3) Of March 1976 [SEAL] Attest:
RUTH C. MASON C. MARSHALL DANN Arresting Office Commissioner oj'larents and Trademarks
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3466485 *||Sep 21, 1967||Sep 9, 1969||Bell Telephone Labor Inc||Cold cathode emitter having a mosaic of closely spaced needles|
|US3665241 *||Jul 13, 1970||May 23, 1972||Stanford Research Inst||Field ionizer and field emission cathode structures and methods of production|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3921022 *||Sep 3, 1974||Nov 18, 1975||Rca Corp||Field emitting device and method of making same|
|US3970887 *||Jun 19, 1974||Jul 20, 1976||Micro-Bit Corporation||Micro-structure field emission electron source|
|US4008412 *||Aug 18, 1975||Feb 15, 1977||Hitachi, Ltd.||Thin-film field-emission electron source and a method for manufacturing the same|
|US4147949 *||May 8, 1978||Apr 3, 1979||General Electric Company||Apparatus for X-ray radiography|
|US4156827 *||Jun 19, 1978||May 29, 1979||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army||Matrix cathode channel image device|
|US4302700 *||Dec 7, 1979||Nov 24, 1981||International Business Machines Corporation||Electrode guide for metal paper printers|
|US5013902 *||Aug 18, 1989||May 7, 1991||Allard Edward F||Microdischarge image converter|
|US5150192 *||Jun 20, 1991||Sep 22, 1992||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy||Field emitter array|
|US5163328 *||Aug 6, 1990||Nov 17, 1992||Colin Electronics Co., Ltd.||Miniature pressure sensor and pressure sensor arrays|
|US5199917 *||Dec 9, 1991||Apr 6, 1993||Cornell Research Foundation, Inc.||Silicon tip field emission cathode arrays and fabrication thereof|
|US5245247 *||Jan 22, 1991||Sep 14, 1993||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Microminiature vacuum tube|
|US5267884 *||Mar 23, 1993||Dec 7, 1993||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Microminiature vacuum tube and production method|
|US5391259 *||Jan 21, 1994||Feb 21, 1995||Micron Technology, Inc.||Method for forming a substantially uniform array of sharp tips|
|US5461280 *||Feb 10, 1992||Oct 24, 1995||Motorola||Field emission device employing photon-enhanced electron emission|
|US5515234 *||Jun 30, 1993||May 7, 1996||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Antistatic protector and method|
|US5559342 *||Apr 6, 1995||Sep 24, 1996||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Electron emitting device having a polycrystalline silicon resistor coated with a silicide and an oxide of a work function reducing material|
|US5585301 *||Jul 14, 1995||Dec 17, 1996||Micron Display Technology, Inc.||Method for forming high resistance resistors for limiting cathode current in field emission displays|
|US5627427 *||Jun 5, 1995||May 6, 1997||Cornell Research Foundation, Inc.||Silicon tip field emission cathodes|
|US5635791 *||Aug 24, 1995||Jun 3, 1997||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Field emission device with circular microtip array|
|US5695658 *||Mar 7, 1996||Dec 9, 1997||Micron Display Technology, Inc.||Non-photolithographic etch mask for submicron features|
|US5712534 *||Jul 29, 1996||Jan 27, 1998||Micron Display Technology, Inc.||High resistance resistors for limiting cathode current in field emmision displays|
|US5753130 *||Jun 18, 1996||May 19, 1998||Micron Technology, Inc.||Method for forming a substantially uniform array of sharp tips|
|US5759078 *||Jul 26, 1996||Jun 2, 1998||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Field emission device with close-packed microtip array|
|US5801485 *||Jun 20, 1995||Sep 1, 1998||U.S. Philips Corporation||Display device|
|US5811020 *||Jul 23, 1997||Sep 22, 1998||Micron Technology, Inc.||Non-photolithographic etch mask for submicron features|
|US5825122 *||Jul 18, 1995||Oct 20, 1998||Givargizov; Evgeny Invievich||Field emission cathode and a device based thereon|
|US5866979 *||Jul 18, 1997||Feb 2, 1999||Micron Technology, Inc.||Method for preventing junction leakage in field emission displays|
|US5923948 *||Aug 8, 1997||Jul 13, 1999||Micron Technology, Inc.||Method for sharpening emitter sites using low temperature oxidation processes|
|US5952771 *||Jan 7, 1997||Sep 14, 1999||Micron Technology, Inc.||Micropoint switch for use with field emission display and method for making same|
|US5975975 *||Aug 13, 1997||Nov 2, 1999||Micron Technology, Inc.||Apparatus and method for stabilization of threshold voltage in field emission displays|
|US5986399 *||Feb 24, 1998||Nov 16, 1999||U.S. Philips Corporation||Display device|
|US6020683 *||Nov 12, 1998||Feb 1, 2000||Micron Technology, Inc.||Method of preventing junction leakage in field emission displays|
|US6028322 *||Jul 22, 1998||Feb 22, 2000||Micron Technology, Inc.||Double field oxide in field emission display and method|
|US6080325 *||Feb 17, 1998||Jun 27, 2000||Micron Technology, Inc.||Method of etching a substrate and method of forming a plurality of emitter tips|
|US6103133 *||Mar 17, 1998||Aug 15, 2000||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Manufacturing method of a diamond emitter vacuum micro device|
|US6126845 *||Jul 15, 1999||Oct 3, 2000||Micron Technology, Inc.||Method of forming an array of emmitter tips|
|US6165374 *||Jul 15, 1999||Dec 26, 2000||Micron Technology, Inc.||Method of forming an array of emitter tips|
|US6174449||May 14, 1998||Jan 16, 2001||Micron Technology, Inc.||Magnetically patterned etch mask|
|US6181308||Aug 21, 1996||Jan 30, 2001||Micron Technology, Inc.||Light-insensitive resistor for current-limiting of field emission displays|
|US6186850||Dec 15, 1999||Feb 13, 2001||Micron Technology, Inc.||Method of preventing junction leakage in field emission displays|
|US6235545||Feb 16, 1999||May 22, 2001||Micron Technology, Inc.||Methods of treating regions of substantially upright silicon-comprising structures, method of treating silicon-comprising emitter structures, methods of forming field emission display devices, and cathode assemblies|
|US6312965||Jun 18, 1997||Nov 6, 2001||Micron Technology, Inc.||Method for sharpening emitter sites using low temperature oxidation process|
|US6398608||Nov 27, 2000||Jun 4, 2002||Micron Technology, Inc.||Method of preventing junction leakage in field emission displays|
|US6417605||Sep 23, 1998||Jul 9, 2002||Micron Technology, Inc.||Method of preventing junction leakage in field emission devices|
|US6423239||Jun 8, 2000||Jul 23, 2002||Micron Technology, Inc.||Methods of making an etch mask and etching a substrate using said etch mask|
|US6441542||Jul 21, 1999||Aug 27, 2002||Micron Technology, Inc.||Cathode emitter devices, field emission display devices, and methods of detecting infrared light|
|US6507329||Jan 30, 2001||Jan 14, 2003||Micron Technology, Inc.||Light-insensitive resistor for current-limiting of field emission displays|
|US6580215 *||Dec 22, 2000||Jun 17, 2003||Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.||Photocathode|
|US6676471||Feb 14, 2002||Jan 13, 2004||Micron Technology, Inc.||Method of preventing junction leakage in field emission displays|
|US6712664||Jul 8, 2002||Mar 30, 2004||Micron Technology, Inc.||Process of preventing junction leakage in field emission devices|
|US6860777||Oct 3, 2002||Mar 1, 2005||Micron Technology, Inc.||Radiation shielding for field emitters|
|US6908355||Nov 13, 2002||Jun 21, 2005||Burle Technologies, Inc.||Photocathode|
|US6987352||Jul 8, 2002||Jan 17, 2006||Micron Technology, Inc.||Method of preventing junction leakage in field emission devices|
|US6992698||Aug 31, 1999||Jan 31, 2006||Micron Technology, Inc.||Integrated field emission array sensor, display, and transmitter, and apparatus including same|
|US7091513||Nov 13, 2000||Aug 15, 2006||Micron Technology, Inc.||Cathode assemblies|
|US7098587||Mar 27, 2003||Aug 29, 2006||Micron Technology, Inc.||Preventing junction leakage in field emission devices|
|US7268482||Jan 11, 2006||Sep 11, 2007||Micron Technology, Inc.||Preventing junction leakage in field emission devices|
|US7629736||Dec 12, 2005||Dec 8, 2009||Micron Technology, Inc.||Method and device for preventing junction leakage in field emission devices|
|US8035295 *||Dec 12, 2005||Oct 11, 2011||Thales||Field-emission cathode, with optical control|
|US20050023442 *||Aug 30, 2004||Feb 3, 2005||Zhongyi Xia||Imaging display and storage methods effected with an integrated field emission array sensor, display, and transmitter|
|US20050023517 *||Aug 30, 2004||Feb 3, 2005||Zhongyi Xia||Video camera and other apparatus that include integrated field emission array sensor, display, and transmitter|
|US20050206314 *||May 9, 2005||Sep 22, 2005||Burle Technologies, Inc.||Photocathode|
|USRE39633||May 12, 2000||May 15, 2007||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Display device with electron-emitting device with electron-emitting region insulated from electrodes|
|USRE40062||Jun 2, 2000||Feb 12, 2008||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Display device with electron-emitting device with electron-emitting region insulated from electrodes|
|USRE40566||Aug 26, 1999||Nov 11, 2008||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Flat panel display including electron emitting device|
|DE19526042A1 *||Jul 17, 1995||Mar 21, 1996||Micron Display Tech Inc||Preventing junction transition residual current in field emission display device|
|DE19526042C2 *||Jul 17, 1995||Jul 24, 2003||Micron Technology Inc N D Ges||Anordnung zum Verhindern eines Grenzübergang-Reststroms in Feldemission-Anzeigevorrichtungen|
|EP0632680A1 *||Jun 28, 1994||Jan 4, 1995||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Antistatic protector and method|
|WO2003043045A2 *||Nov 13, 2002||May 22, 2003||Nanosciences Corp||Photocathode|
|WO2006063982A1 *||Dec 12, 2005||Jun 22, 2006||Thales Sa||Optically controlled field emission cathode|
|U.S. Classification||313/542, 257/431, 313/309, 313/105.00R, 257/917, 313/351, 257/10, 257/428, 313/367|
|International Classification||H01J9/12, H01J1/34, H01J1/35, H01J1/304, H01J31/48, H01J9/02, H01J31/49, H01J1/32|
|Cooperative Classification||H01J9/12, H01J2201/3423, H01J1/34, H01J1/304, H01J31/48, H01J31/49, Y10S257/917|
|European Classification||H01J31/48, H01J1/34, H01J31/49, H01J1/304, H01J9/12|