|Publication number||US3816486 A|
|Publication date||Jun 11, 1974|
|Filing date||Nov 25, 1970|
|Priority date||Nov 26, 1969|
|Publication number||US 3816486 A, US 3816486A, US-A-3816486, US3816486 A, US3816486A|
|Original Assignee||Du Pont|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Referenced by (45), Classifications (8)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
June 11, O. R,k VAlL TWO STAGE DRAWN AND RELAXED STALE FIBER Filed Nov. 25, 1970 ZOEHUmw o ozoumw zorumm 22mm Pm ZOCbmm Qmmu at 7 percent elongation (T7) which is rupture occurs.
United States Patent O 3,816,486 TWO STAGE DRAWN AND RELAXED STAPLE FIBER Oakley R. Vail, Kinston, N.C., assignor to E. I. du
Pont de Nemours and Company, Wilmington, Del. Continuation-impart of abandoned application Ser. No.
880,132, Nov. 26, 1969. This application Nov. 25,
1970, Ser. No. 92,776
IntlCl. B29c I 7/02; C08g 17/00 U.S. Cl. 260-75 R Claims ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE A process for drawing polyester filaments that includes the steps of drawing the filaments in a first zone at a temperature between C. and 50 C. followed by further drawing the filaments in a second zone at a temperature above 70 C. but below the melting point of the polyester. When the polyester is polyethylene terephthalate, it is preferred that the filaments be drawn at least about 2.6 times their original length at a'temperature between 25 C. and 45 C. in the first draw zone and then further drawn in the second draw zone at a temperature of from about 70 C. to about 150 C. to provide a total draw ratio of at least about 28:1. The fibers produced have a tenacity at 7 percent elongation of less than 2.0 grams per denier, a low shrinking force and when blended with cotton provide a blend yarn having a high Lea Product.
VCROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION This application is a continuation-in-part of my copending application Ser. No. 880,132, filed Nov. 26, 1969, now abandoned.
'BACKGROUND OF VTHE INVENTION This invention relates to the drawing of polyester filaments and vmore particularly to a two-step drawing process and products obtained thereby.
It is well known that characteristics of polyester yarns intended for textile operations can be improved by drawing the filaments in two stages. \U.S. Pat. No. 2,556,295 discloses a process for drawing at temperatures in excess of the second order transition temperature (c g., above 67 C. for polyethylene terephthalate) in a first stage and above the apparent minimum crystallization temperature (e.g., 100 C. for polyethylene terephthalate) in a second stage. British Pat. No. 603,840 discloses the heating of filaments suited for use in textile operations while they are being drawn, and teaches the desirability of drawing in two stages for removing residual stretch. While the processes of the prior art are suitable for many purposes, they are not completely satisfactory especially for producing the desired results in the manufacture of certain highstrength polyester staple fibers.
One of the primary uses of polyester staple fibers is in cotton blend yarns and for high efficiency in processing yarn to fabric it is desirable to obtain high blend yarn strength (Lea Product) particularly in the weaker, ner cotton counts. Historically, the way to obtain high blend yarn strength has been by blending a polyester fiber having a high tenacity (e.g., from 2.5-3.5 grams per denier) where initialfcotton SUMMARY oF THE 'INVENTION In light of the prior art, itwas indeed surprising to disfrom high T7 polyester yarn, could be obtained from va cover that a high strengthqblend yarn,.comparable togthat i prising drawing the lamentsjin a first stage ata tempera- Patented June 11., 1974 ICC ture between 10 C. and 50 C. and in a second stage at a temperature above C. but below the melting point of the polyester. In the drawing of polyethylene terephthalate filaments, it is preferred that the filaments be drawn at a draw ratio of at least about 2.6:1 at a temperature between room temperature and about 45 C. in the first stage, and that the total draw ratio be at least about 2.8:1 in drawing the filaments in a second stage at a temperature of about 70 C. to about 150 C. The fibers produced in the practice of this invention are particularly well suited for textile operations requiring a high-strength fiber such as in the production of sewing thread or polyester-cotton blend yarns that are to be resin treated. The fibers are preferably relaxed and have a tenacity at 7 percent elongation of less than 2.0 grams per denier, a shrinkage force of less than 0.15 gram per denier and a fine structure characterized by a q value greater than 1.9 calculated by:
gb is a dimensionless number characterizing fine structure,
M2 is the ratio of change in stress in grams per denier to change in strain expressed as percent elongation in the steepest straight line portion of the stress strain curve after the yield point,
Mi is the ratio of change in stress to change in strain in the initial straight line point of a stress strain curve following the removal of any crimp,
11 is intrinsic viscosity of the polyester when measured in a dilute solution of solvent consisting of 3 parts of methylene chloride and l1 part of trifiuoroacetic acid as the solvent.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING The drawing is a schematic illustration of an apparatus useful for practicing the invention.
In the drawing, a bundle of polyester filaments 1 hom a suitable supply, moves through a preheating bath 3, a feed-roll section comprising rolls 5 to 19, a first-draw section comprising a draw bath 21, guide rolls 23 and 25, and draw-rolls 27-37, and a second-stage draw section comprising sprays 41 for applying a heated liquid to the filaments and draw-rolls 43-55. The drawn filaments then may be forwarded `from the second-stage draw section and subsequently given an additional heat treatment as indicated and further described hereinafter.
In the two-stage drawing of polyester filaments to give them high-strength characteristics, it unexpectedly has been found that significantly improved results are obtained when the first-stage draw is carried out at a relatively low temperature. When the filaments are heated, for example, with a liquid having a temperature below about '50 C., the filaments can be drawn in a second stage to provide a higher strength than can be obtained when a higher temperature, such as, for example, a temperature above C., is used to first draw the filaments. While low temperatures such as 10 C. and lower produced good results, it is preferred that the drawing be carried out at a temperature above 10 C. particularly -when using aqueous baths. Preferably, treatment will be carried out using aqueous baths maintained at a temperature from room temperature up to about 45 C. While aqueous baths are preferred, other means may be used such as .liquids that are nonsolvents for Vthe polymer, -gases,ieither=cooled or heated, and metal surfaces` It is desirable but not essential that a preheat bath be used prior tothe first-stage draw and thatits vtemperature not -exceedthe first-stage drawY temperature. Heating, -of course, is to be carried out fora sufficient length of time 3 to allow the temperature of the filaments to at least closely approach that of the bath.
In the practice of this invention, the filaments used as the supply should have a low order of crystallinity and preferably will be essentially amorphous. When highly crystalline polymer is used, the desired results are not obtained. In the production of polyester filaments whereby the molten polymer is solidified by rapid quenching, the polymer will be obtained in an amorphous state. Those skilled in the art of producing polyester filaments from the melt are familiar with the practice followed for minimizing the formation of crystallinity in the spun product.
In drawing the polyester filaments, the surprising discovery has been made that the maximum total draw obtainable is dependent upon the draw ratio used in the first stage. In practicing the present invention, the highest total draw ratios obtained correspond to the highest draw ratios used in the first stage draw. In order to obtain a total draw ratio greater than about 3.8:1, the first stage draw ratio must exceed about 2.6:1. Total draw ratio refers to the product of the draw ratios at which the filaments are drawn.
The drawn fibers from the first-stage are drawn a sec- Vond time at an increased temperature. The second drawing may constitute a separate process and thus involve a lagging period and a storage operation or, preferably, it will be continuous with the first-stage drawing and thus the draw rolls for the first-stage draw can function as the feed rolls for the second-stage draw. Useful results are obtained at temperatures as low as 70 C., but preferably the filaments will be heated with a fluid having a temperature of at least about 90 C. Since aqueous baths are also preferred as the means for heating the filaments in the second stage and because of the improved results obtained at the higher temperatures, temperatures approaching the boiling point of water, e.g., from about 94 C. to about 98 C., are especially preferred. Temperatures up to the softening point of the polymer may be used in heating the filaments in the second-stage draw zone and thus heated gases, such as air and steam, heated liquids having high boiling points and heated metallic surfaces may be used. Steam is a preferred heating fluid and steam temperatures from 100 C. to about 250 C. may be used with temperatures in the lower part of the range, i.e., below about 200 C., being preferred. It is to be noted that amorphous polymer has a lower melting point than crystalline polymer and, therefore, some care must be exercised in the choice of the manner and means used to heat the filaments during the second-stage draw. In general, the filaments should not contact high-temperature, metallic surfaces until the filaments have been exposed to temperatures of at least about 100 C.
For optimum results, the draw ratio used in the second-stage draw should approach the highest that can be obtained without causing the filaments to break. Excessive broken filaments result in poor quality and inordinately high draw ratios are to be avoided.
While acceptable results may be obtained with secondstage draw ratios as low as 1.l:l, preferred draw ratios range from about 1.2:1 to about 1.7 l.
While the applicant does not wish to be held thereto, it is believed that the following explains, at least in part, the surprising results obtained by the practice of this invention. In the drawing of polyester filaments, it is desirable to apply heat to the filaments as an aid to obtaining maximum draw and to crystallize the drawn fibers. Thus, in drawing polyester fibers in one stage the use of a relatively high temperature leads to an optimum result by facilitating the use of high draw ratios and providing a crystalline drawn product having a high melting point. Crystalline products are desirable since the thermal stability of the polymer is believed to be directly related to its crystallinity. Polymer crystals are believed to be formed from segments of different molecules whose proxmity to each other is such that they can become arranged in a crystal pattern and, further, that any one of the macromolecules can be a part of more than one crystal or crystalline region. Accordingly, the crystalline regions are viewed as serving as tie points that act to create a relatively rigid structure that will not undergo any thermally induced change until the temperature of its formation has been exceeded. It is apparent then, that from this viewpoint the formation of crystalline regions during the orientation of the polymer molecules in the drawing process can function to limit the amount of draw that might otherwise be obtained.
In the present invention, however, the temperature is kept so low during the orientation of the polymer molecules in the first-stage drawing that crystallization is kept to a very minimum. Accordingly, a major portion of the total possible draw can be obtained before the yarn becomes crystalline and this allows the attainment of a higher total draw when the filaments are subsequently redrawn under crystallizing conditions. Since draw-bath temperatures as low as 70 C. in the second-stage draw give a useful result and since 70 C. is below the temperature where a significant degree of crystallinity is believed to be obtained, it is assumed that the heat of drawing is sufficient to provide the crystallinity to give a useful product.
According to the above considerations, in the drawing of polyethylene terephthalate filaments under crystallizing conditions, the highest attainable draw ratio will be obtained when the filament to be drawn under crystallizing conditions contains its highest attainable degree of orientation in the amorphous state. In the orientation of amorphous polyethylene terephthalate filaments, it has been found that there is a moderate, but significant, increase in the maximum draw ratio attainable with temperatures up to about 50 C. At higher temperatures, there is a marked and deleterious change in the amount of total draw that can be obtained. Accordingly, a temperature below 50 C., preferably of about 45 C., is used in the first stage draw in order to obtain optimum or near optimum results. The draw ratio used will be that consistent with the production of a high quality product, i.e., one having few, if any, broken filaments. In practice, the draw ratio is increased until the presence of broken filaments becomes rapparent and the draw ratio then decreased a small amount to return the process to an acceptable condition. While this practice is subject to a small error by the observer, it is effective and permits the ready selection of the desired conditions. In this manner, it can be determined that highly preferred first-stage draw ratios for polyethylene terephthalate are those between about 2.6:1 and about 3.0:l.
The drawn fibers of this invention preferably are given further heat treatment such as during an additional drawing step, a relaxation step, an annealing step or a combination of such steps. By relaxation is meant that the filaments are heated in a unconstrained condition at a temperature higher than any pretreatment temperature so that the filaments are free to shrink. By annealing is meant that the fibers are crystallized while under tension preferably by heating them at a temperature higher than any pretreatment temperature. Where fibers having a high shrinkage level are desired, the heat treating step is omitted.
Relaxation of the fibers is normally carried out to reduce the shrinkage, eg., boil-off shrinkage and dry-heat shrinkage of the fibers, and this is accompanied by some loss in tenacity and a gain in the percent elongation. Relaxation may be carried out using means known to those skilled in the art, such as heating the filaments in a hotair oven, or a hot-air or steam jet or by passing them around heated rolls. Temperatures of C. to 200 C. may be used with temperatures of C. to 150 C. being preferred.
When it is desired to reduce shrinkage and maintain high tenacity, the filaments are annealed rather than relaxed. Annealing is carried out in such a manner that there is no appreciable loss in the orientation achieved during drawing and the resultant laments have higher tenacities than would otherwise be the case. The drawn filaments may be annealed by any means known to those skilled in the art, such as by the use of the heating means previously referred to or by the use of appropriate solvent, such as methylene chloride, chloroform and the like. Annealing temperatures may range from 180 C. to 240 C. with temperatures of 190 C. to 220 C. being preferred. Annealed bers are characterized as having a relatively high Tq. The expression T7 refers to the tenacity, in grams per denier of the filament at 7% elongation. A high T7 value, e.g., 2.0 and above, it especially significant in relation to blends with cotton which has a break elongation of about 7 Surprisingly, it has been found that relaxed bers of this invention provide high strength yarns when blended with cotton despite having relative low T7 values, e.g., below 1.5. After the drawn bers have been subjected to one or more additional heat-treating steps, they are passed to other textile operations. Thus, the drawn and heattreated bers may, for example, be crimped, dried and cut to staple bers. Alternatively, it may be desirable to carry out one or more textile operations, for example, crimping prior to a relaxation heat-treating step.
By polyesters is meant ber-forming linear condensaltion polymers containing in the polymer chain the carbonyloxy linking radicals i -C-O Polymers containing Oxy-carbonyloxy radicals are comprehended within this group. In the absence of an indication to the contrary, a reference to polyesters is meant 'to encompasscopolyesters, terpolyesters and the like. The
'ephthalate/isophthalate (85/ 15), polyethylene terephthalate/hexahydroterephthalate (90/10), Polyethylene terephthalate/S-(sodium sulfo)isophthalate (97/3), poly(phexahydroxylylene terephthalate), poly(diphenylolpro pane isophthalate), the polyethylene naphthalene dicarboxylates (especially those derived from the 2,6- and 2,7- isomers) and poly(hexamethylene bibenzoate). Polyethylene terephthalate and terephthalate copolyesters, in which at least 85 mol-percent of the dibasic acid -units are terephthalate units are preferred polyesters.
' Especially preferred copolyesters are those containing ionic constituents. Preferably the ionic group will be those which provide polyesters with an affinity for basic dyes. The ionic group may be a sulfonate, a sulfinate, a phosphonate, a phosphinate or a carboxylate and preferably will be a sulfonate group in the form of a metallic salt. Suitable polymers are described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,018,- 272 but other polyesters containing the sulfonate salt may be used as Well.
The polyesters preferably will have an intrinsic viscosity, 17, of from 0.3 to 0.8 when measured in a dilute solution of solvent consisting of a weight mixture of 3 parts of methylene chloride and 1 part of trifluoroacetic acid as the solvent. Copolyesters will have an intrinsic viscosity of from about 40.3 to about 0.50 most preferably 0.3 to 0.4.
It has been found that polyester filaments prepared using the present invention have a high second modulus, M2, and a high initial modulus, 'M1 and a high qb 'value as well. Despite the fact that some of these fibers when heat treated have low T7 values, it has been found, surprisingly, that they provide high-strength, cotton-blend yarns.
Initial Modulus (M1) is defined as the ratio of change in stress to change in strain in the intial straight line portion (i.e., before the yield point) of a stress-strain curve following the removal of any crimp. The ratio is calculated from the stress expressed in force (grams) per unit of linear density (denier) of the original specimen, and the strain expressed as percent elongation.
Second Modulus (M2) is defined as the ratio of change in stress to change in strain in the steepest straight-line portion of the stress-strain cur-ve after the yield point. 'I'he ratio used herein is calculated from the stress expressed in force (grams) per unit of linear density (denier) of the sample at the initial point of the straight-line portion of the curve, and the strain expressed as percent elongation.
The moduli of the laments are dependent on the intrinsic viscosity of the polymer as well as upon the manner in which the filament is preared. This relationship can be expressed in terms of a value where:
and M2, M, and n are defined above. Fibers prepared in the practice of the present invention will have a qs value of at least 1.80, preferably 1.8 to 5.0 and most preferably 1.9 to 3.2. Typical values used in calculating the qS value are Mi values of 35.6 to 73.5; M2 values of 35.0 to 115.7; and values of n from 0.36 to 0.72.
It is also important to provide polyester laments with a low level of shrinkage. The measure of shrinkage used herein is dry-heat shrinkage. Dry-heat shrinkage increases with temperature and a temperature of 196 C. has been chosen for the determination to indicate a shrinkage value of maximum magnitude. The filaments should have a dryheat shrinkage at 196 C., DHSIQBQC, not greater than 12% and preferably not greater than 10% For specialized uses, dry-heat shrinkage at 196 C. below 6% is required. The following table illustrates the range of products that can be prepared.
In drawing the bers of this invention, they are drawn to a very high degree but some drawability is left in the fibers. This is believed to provide the fibers with an element of toughness. As the extent of draw approaches the theoretical amount attainable, particularly at the higher temperatures, the fibers Ibecome more and more brittle and they have a high resistance to further longitudinal deformation. This is believed to be the reason why highly drawn bers of the prior art have relatively low p values and are not entirely satisfactory for blending with cotton fibers. Fibers prepared in accordance with this invention, i.e., drawn at a temperature below 50 C. and subsequently drawn and crystallized at temperatures of about C. or more to a total draw ratio of about 3.5 or more, can be expected to have high p values, i.e., values greater than 2.0. High qS Values are maintained after heat treating and will be at least 1.90 and bers with these high p values lead to excellent yarns when blended with cotton. When these bers are heat-treated to relax them, the high qb values are in marked contrast to the low T, values. It is surprising that these high-strength, high-4 value fibers would have such low T7 values, i.e., values below 2.0. As indicated above, it has been found, surprisingly, that despite their low T7 values and contrary to the teachings of the prior art, these fibers with their high tp values can be converted to blend yarns of high strength.
7 For example, a fiber having a 15 value above 1.90 and a T7 of 1.2 yields of 50/1 cc., 65/ 35 polyester/cotton blend yarn having a Lea Product of over 2300 which is superior to conventional low T7 fibers and comparable to conventional high T7 fibers.
These fibers with high qb values and low T7 values are also characterized by having a low shrinkage force, i.e., below 0.20 g.p.d. and, preferably, below 0.15 g.p.d. This is a distinct advantage over the high strength fibers of the prior art having high shrinkage forces since, obviously, when they are converted to fabric form they can be expected to shrink less and thus provide the desirable result of high fabric yield. The restraint placed on the fibers in fabric form must be overcome for shrinkage to occur and those fibers which exhibit low shrinkage forces will, therefore, produce low shrinkage.
In producing these novel fibers with high p values that are so well suited for the production of cotton blend yarns, care must, of course, be exercised to insure that the more conventional properties required for such fibers are maintained. Thus, these fibers are also characterized as having a tenacity of at least 5.0 g.p.d. and preferably at least 6.0 g.p.d., an elongation of at least 15%, preferably 20-30% and a dry-heat shrinkage, as measured at 196 C., of less than 12% preferably less than 10%.
The practice of this invention is particularly important in drawing filaments of Copolyesters. Copolyesters are of interest because they offer a route to modified polymers, e.g., polymers with more versatile dyeing characteristics. However, the introduction of different units to modify the polymer molecule also disrupts the regularity of molecular structure which alters molecular relationships and leads to reduced strength in filaments. It has now been discovered that copolyesters drawn in accordance with the present invention are endowed with high qb values but do not suffer any deleterious loss in their dyeing properties. This important discovery is particularly important to the drawing of copolyesters of low viscosity (low molecular Weight) since reduced molecular weight also leads to reduced filament strength. As is known to those skilled in the art, low viscosity polymers provide pilling resistance to polyester staple fibers and for those uses where pilling resistance is needed, low viscosity polymer is utilized,
but at a sacrifice in strength. It was, therefore highly surv prising to discover that in producing filaments of lowviscosity copolymer (indicative of Weakness) that fibers with a high qb value (indicative of strength) were obtained with no significant loss in pilling resistance. For example, when a terephthalate copolymer containing sulfonate groups for conferring good basic dyeability and having an intrinsic viscosity of 0.38 is used to prepare staple fibers which are converted to a 22/1 cc. yarn, the yarn is found to have good strength, good dyeability and to resist pilling in knit fabrics. Compared to a similar control yarn produced by art-known methods, its Lea Product is found to be 2100 versus only 1700 from the prior art yarn and it retains the desirable pilling resistance of the control yarn.
The Instron measurements referred to hereinafter were determined on an Instron instrument with a cross-head speed equal to 60% of sample length per minute (60% testing rate) with a temperature maintained at 70m2 F. and Relative Humidity at 65 *2% The spun filaments used in the practice of this invention can be expected to have birefringence values ranging from about 0.004 to about 0.015.
The breaking strength of the spun yarns illustrated in the examples is expressed as the Lea Product which is the product of the cotton count times the skein (120 yards) break strength in pounds.
'Ihe shrinkage force is determined by the following procedure. From a suitable supply, a sample group of the filaments to give 200114 denier is selected. The length of the sample should be at least 75 centimeters. Twelve samples are required and they are used to obtain data for constructing a shrinkage versus load curve. A loop' is formed in each sample which results in a length of 35 centimeters. The original length (Lo) of the loop under a load of 0.1 g.p.d., based on twice the initial denier, is measured. Weights are attached to the loops resulting in loads of 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.50 and 1.0 g.p.d., there being two loops at each loading. The weighted loops are suspended in an oven at a temperature of 200 C.i2 C. for 30 minutes, removed and cooled to room temperature. The final length of the cooled loop under 0.1 g.p.d. load (Lf) is measured and the percent length change calculated from the formula:
The percent length change versus load points are plotted and a curve drawn. The weights have been chosen to provide both positive and negative length changes and the point on the curve corresponding to no change in length is the shrinkage force of the fiber in grams per denier.
EXAMPLE I This example illustrates a preferred practice 'of the present invention.
Polyethylene terephthalate polymer is spun into filaments from the melt in the usual manner. The polymer of the filaments is essentially amorphous and has an intrinsic viscosity of 0.66. The filaments are spun at 1600 y.p.m. (24.4 meters/sec.) from a 621-hole spinneret at 55.3 lbs./ hr., and passed over a finish roll rotating in a dilute aqueous bath of an antistatic lubricating composition. The filaments from this and other similar positions are then combined in a bundle, and forwarded to supply cans. Bundles of filaments from these cans are combined to form a tow which serves as the supply for drawing filaments using apparatus similar to that shown in the figure. The tow has a denier of about 500,000.
The tow is passed to the preheat bath of Water maintained at 45 C. The tow then passes4 over the feed rolls that rotate at a surface speed of 53.5 yards per minute (0.815 meters per second). The tow then passes through the draw bath of water maintained at 45 C., and then to the first-stage draw rolls. The draw rolls rotate at a surface speed of 142 yards per minute (2.17 meters per second) to provide a machine draw ratio for the first stage of 2.66: l. The machine draw ratio refers to the ratio ofthe Percent length change surface speed of the draw rolls to the surfacespeed of the feed rolls. The tow is passed to a spray draw zone where it is treated with Water at 98 C. and then to the secondstage draw rolls rotating at a surface speed of 200 yards per minute (3.05 meters per second) to give a total machine draw ratio of 3.74. The tow is then heated for several seconds on hot rolls having a temperature of 200 C. and rotating at essentially the same surface speed as the secondstage draw rolls to keep the filaments under a constant level of tension. The annealed tow, which is air-cooled on its passage to a set of puller rolls, is fed to a stuffer-box type of crimper Where aqueous finish is applied. The tow is then dried in an oven at v75 C. to remove excess moisture. Instron measurements (results from 10 measurements are averaged) on single filaments with a gauge length of 10 inches (25.4 centimeters) show a tenacity of 7.7 grams per denier, a T7 of 3.7 an elongation at break of 11.7%, an initial modulus of 57.3 grams per denier, a second modulus of 95.5 grams per denier, a qb value of 2.52, and dry-heat shrinkage at 196 C. of 8.4%. The tow is cut to staple fibers about 1.5 inch (3.8 centimeters) in length. A 50/1 cc. blend yarn with a twist multiple of 4.00 is prepared on the cotton system from this staple. The yarn contains, by weight, 65% of the polyester staple fibers and 35% of combed-peeler cotton fibers and has a Lea Product of 3274.
When tow spun and doubly drawn in a manner similar to that described above to a total machine drawn ratio of 3.62 and then relaxed for 5 minutes at 140 C., the
above described manner of testing shows the laments to have a tenacity of 6.6 grams per denier, a T7 of 1.2, an elongation at break of 26.5% and initial modulus of 54.5, a second modulus of `69.0, a dry-heat'shrinkage at 196 C. of 8.3% and a value of 1.93. The tow is cut to staple fibers about 1.5 inch (3.8 centimeters) in length. A 50/1 ce. blend yarn with a twist multiple of 4.00 is prepared on the cotton system from this staple. The yarns contain, by weight, 65% of the polyester staple fibers and 35 of combed-peeler cotton fibers and has a Lea Product of v 'Y EXAMPLE II This example illustrates the use of a copolyester in the practice of the present invention.
' A copolyester of polyethylene terephthalate containing 2 mol-percent of ester-forming units from sodium 3,5-dicarbomethoxybenzenesulfonate is prepared and spun into filaments in a manner similar to that described in Example I. The polymer of the filaments has an intrinsic viscosity of 0.46. The filaments are spun from a 621-hole spinneret, passed over a rfinish roll rotating in a dilute aqueous bath of an antistatic lubricating composition and wound up on bobbins at 1664 yards per minute (25.4 meters per second). The laments have a denier per iilament of 4.7.
The filaments from 25 bobbins produced as described above are combined to form a tow having a denier of about 70,000 and the tow drawn in much the same manner as that described in Example I. The tow passes through a prefeed bath of water at 25 C. and around feed rolls rotating at 30 yards per minute (0.457 meter per second) and through a first-stage draw bath of water at 45 C. and then around the first-stage draw rolls rotating at 85.5 yards per minute (1.30 meters per second). The tow then passes to the second draw zone, where it is heated by spraying water at a temperature of 98 C. onto the lilaments, and then to the second-stage draw rolls rotating at a speed of 117 yards per minute (1.78 meters per second). The total machine draw ratio is 390:1. The drawn filaments are crimped in a stufer box crimper in a standard manner and the crimped tow is relaxed at 135 C. for about 5 minutes. The filaments have a denier per filament of 1.5 and are tested in the above-described manner. The filaments have a tenacity of 4.5 grams per denier and a break elongation of 21.3%, an initial modulus of 46.6, a second modulus of 52.4, a 1 value of 2.45 and a dry heat shrinkage of 196 C. of 7.4%. A 20/1 cc. blend yarn with 17 turns per inch twist (6.7 turns per centimeter) is prepared on the cotton system from staple 1.5-inch (3.8 centimeters) in length. The yarn contains, by weight, 65% of the copolyester staple fibers and 35% of combedpeeler cotton fibers and has a Lea Product of 2410.
EXAMPLE IH This example illustrates the use of another polyester in the practice of the invention.
Poly(tetramethylene terephthalate) is spun from the melt through a 156-hole spinneret and the rapidlyquenched filaments wound on bobbins at a speed of 1280 yards per minute (19.5 meters per second).
The filaments from of these bobbins are combined to form a tow having a denier of about 57,000 and the tow drawn in a manner similar to that described in Example I. The first-stage draw bath has a temperature of 45 C. The first-stage draw rolls rotate at a speed of 114 yards per minute (1.74 meters per second) and the filaments are drawn at a draw ratio of 3.80. The second-stage draw rollsrotate at a speed of 134 yards per minute (2.04 meters per. second). and the lfilaments are drawn at a draw ratio of 1.18.-r f
The drawn tow is heatedA at constant length at 170 C., l
sprayed with finish heated to about 82 C. and crimped in a stuffer-box crimper. Measured as described above, the filaments show a tenacity of 5.4 grams per denier and a break at elongation of 23.71%.
A10 v EXAM-PLE IV v This example illustrates the effect of the first-stage draw temperature on the maximum total drawratio..
'Polyethylene terephthalatefilaments areA spun and drawn in a manner similar to that described in Example I.
VTen similar runs are made that differ only in the temperature of theA first-stage draw bath wherein the filaments are drawn at a machine draw ratio of 2.75: 1.; In the secondstage draw the filaments from the 10 runs are drawn at 98 C. at increasing machine drawV ratios until broken .filaments appear. Results obtained are shown in Table II.
I TABLE'rr l Does not draw.
From these results, it is apparent that drawing temperatures below about 50 C., in the first-stage provide significantly higher total machine draw ratios.
EXAMPLE V This example illustrates the effect of the first stage draw ratio on the total draw ratio that is obtained in the practice of this invention.
Polyester filaments are spun and drawn in a manner similar to that described in Example I. The filaments have an intrinsic viscosity of 0.66. The first stage draw temperature is 40 C. and the second-stage temperature is about 100 C. Ten runs are made at increasing first-stage draw ratios. The second-stage draw ratio for each run is the maximum operable draw ratio obtainable for that run without the attainment of excessive broken filaments. Otherwise the 10 runs are the same. The draw ratios obtained are given in Table III.
TABLE III Draw ratio First Second stage stage 1 Total EXAMPLE VI at 45 C. and then overthe feed rolls that rotate ata speed of 30.2 y.p.m. (0.459 meters/second). The'tow then passes through the first draw bath of water at 45 C. and then over the first stage draw rolls which rotate at 79.5 y.p.m. (1.21 meters/second) to provide a machine draw fri ratio of 2.64:1 for the first stage' draw. The tow is passed t'ia spray"drawzonejwhere it-is treated with water at -chine draw! ratio of`3.65. 'The towis then heated for several seconds on hot rolls at al temperature of1200 C. which rotate 'at 107 y.p'.'m.'-(1.63 meters/ second)'to allow 'a' 2.6% reductionv in'leng'th' of 'the filaments. The hot 'annealed tow is passed to a setof pullerrolls which rotate y 'at 101.7"y.p.mr'(1.5`51meters/second)l to allow-a further reduction in lengthA of about '5%, vand then is crimped in A copolyester of 2G-T containing 2 mole percent of DRL-6 is prepared and spun as in Example I. The polymer has an intrinsic viscosity of 0.38 (12.5RV); The fila-A ments are spun from a 320 hole spinneret, lubricated with an antistatic finish and wound up on bobbins at 1572 y.p.m. (23.9 metcrs/ second). The filaments have a denier per filament of 10.4.
The filaments from 30 bobbins produced' as described above are combined to form a tow having a denier of about 100,000 and the tow drawn in the manner described in Example I. The tow passesthrough a prefeed bath of water at 20 C. and around feed rolls rotating at 30 y.p.m. (0.457 meters/second) and through a first stage draw bath of water at 40 C. and then around first stage .draw rolls rotating at 87.8 y.p.m. (1.33 meters/second).
The tow then passes to the second draw zone, where it is heated by a 98 C. water spraying on the filaments, and then to the second stage draw rolls rotating at a speed of 118 y.p.m. (1.79 m.p.s.). The total machine draw ratio is 3.9321. The drawn filaments are crimped in a stuffer box crimper in the usual manner and the crimped tow is relaxed at 130 C. for about 5 minutes. The filaments have a denier per filament of 3.16 and are tested as described previously. The filaments have a tenacity of 3.3, an initial modulus of 44, a secondmodulus of 35, a 4: value of 2.18, a dry heat shrinkage of 7.5% at 196 C., a T7 of 1.3 and a brbeak elongation of 15.6%.
Staple fibers from 1.5 inch filaments similar to those produced above are used to prepare a 22/1 cc. yarn having a Lea Product of 2050. These yarns are dyed and then readily knit into fabrics which are used to prepare garments. The garments are used in a 20D-hour wear evaluation and are given a pilling rating of 4.6 on a scale of 3 to 5.0 wherein 3.0 is borderline-acceptable; and the higher numbers represent the more desirable performance. A control yarn made from fibers having a known propensity to good pilling resistance has a Lea Product of 1742. This control is dyed and knit into the same type of fabric..V
kwearftestedjfor 200 hours and are also founnd to `have a pilling ratingf 4.6.iAlthough'-the knittingl performance is unsatisfactory, sufficient fabric is""`obtained for a wear I evaluation'. y
What is claimedis: "f i 1:. A drawn relaxed' polyester f 'kstaplel fiber, said fiber having a tenacityat 7 percent elongation of less`than'2.0 grams per denier, a shrinkage force of less than 0.15 gram per denerand a fine structure.,characterized by a p value greater than 1.9 calculated by;
, 12 wherez` qb is a-dimensionless number characterizing fine structure, M2 is `the ratioofchange in stress in grams per denier to change in strain expressed as percent elongation in the steepes't straight .line portion of the stress strain curve Y after the yield point, l ,l l .Mi is the ratio lof changer-in stress to change in strain in the initial straight-line point of a-stress strain curve followingthe removal of any crimp, Y 11 is intrinsic viscosity of the polyester when measured in a dilute solution of solvent consisting of 3 parts of methylene chloride and 1 part of triliuoroacetic acid as the solvent, Y Y said staple fiber being cut from a tow drawn in an aqueous -bath in the absence of arcracking agent in a first draw zone at a temperature of 10 C. to 50 C. at a draw ratio of from 2.6:1 to 3.0:1 then immediately further drawn in a second draw zoneeat a temperature of from 70 C. to about 150 C. to a totaldraw ratio of from 3.5:1 to about 4.0:1 and relaxed at a temperature above lthe drawing temperature.
2. The fiber as defined in claim 1, said fibervbeing relaxed at a temperature of about C. to about 150 C., said rp value being in the range of from 1.9 to` about 3.0.
3. The fiber as definedv in clairnl, said fiber having an intrinsic viscosity of from about 0.3 to about 0.8.
4.The fiber as defined in claim 1, said fiber being a copolyester.
5. The fiber as defined in claim 4, said fiber having an intrinsic viscosity of from about 0.3 to about 0.4.
6. The fiber as defined in claim 1said fiber having a tenacity of at least 6.0 grams per denier.A
7. The fiber as defined in claim`4,'said liber having tenacity of about 4.5 grams per denier.
, 8. A process for drawing a filamentary tow` of polyethylene terephthalate comprising the sequential steps of:
f drawing the tow in the absence of cracking agents in an about 2.6:1 to about 3.0:1 and then furtherV drawing the tow in a second draw'zone at a temperature of from about 70 C. to about 150 C. to a total draw ratio of from about 3.5:1 to about 4.0: 1.
9. The process as defined in claim 8, said'tow being drawn in said first zone at temperatures offrom about 25 C. to about 45 C.; and being further drawn in said second zone at a temperature in therange of from about 90 C. to 100 C. v f f References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTSv 2,768,057 10/ 1956 Friederich 8-130.1 2,615,784 10/ 1952 McClellan 8-136.1 2,734,794 2/ 1956 Calton 264--290 T 3,117,173 1/1964 Adams 264-290 T 3,400,192 9/ 1968 Hartmann et al. 264-290 T 3,400,194 9/ 1968 Boone et al.' 264--290 T 3,450,811 6/1969 Talcigawa et al. 264-290 T 3,527,862 9/1970 l Shimorako et al. 264-290 T 3,567,817 3/ 1971 Spiller 264-290 T 3,587,221 6/1971 Buzano 264-'168 3,190,718 6/ 1965 Schoeneberg et al. 3,492,195 1/ 1970 Spangler et al.
3,651,198 3/1922 Mitsuishi et al. 26-290 T f FOREIGN .PATENTSl t 24,318 10/1964 Japan 264-290 10,493 5/1969 Japan 264-290 1,063,013 3/ 1967 Great Britain.
187,209 10/ 1966 Russia. JAY H. woo, Prima'rynxamine U.s. C1. X.R.
260-75 T; 264--210 F, 290 T
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3963678 *||Jun 17, 1974||Jun 15, 1976||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Large denier polyethylene terephthalate monofilaments having good transverse properties|
|US3963844 *||Jun 10, 1974||Jun 15, 1976||Teijin Limited||Extrusion-molded article having good thermal stability|
|US4060516 *||Jan 5, 1976||Nov 29, 1977||Teijin Limited||Naphthalate polyester filaments|
|US4071502 *||Apr 14, 1975||Jan 31, 1978||Toyo Boseki Kabushiki Kaisha||Polyester fiber having anti-pilling property and its production|
|US4092299 *||Jun 23, 1976||May 30, 1978||Monsanto Company||High draw ratio polyester feed yarn and its draw texturing|
|US4112668 *||Jun 17, 1977||Sep 12, 1978||Monsanto Company, St. Louis, Missouri||Method for treating polyester filaments|
|US4113704 *||Jun 24, 1976||Sep 12, 1978||Monsanto Company||Polyester filament-forming polymer and its method of production|
|US4414169 *||Feb 26, 1979||Nov 8, 1983||Fiber Industries, Inc.||Production of polyester filaments of high strength possessing an unusually stable internal structure employing improved processing conditions|
|US4526738 *||Jul 8, 1983||Jul 2, 1985||Toray Industries, Inc.||Polyester fiber and method for the production thereof|
|US4639347 *||Mar 16, 1984||Jan 27, 1987||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Process of making crimped, annealed polyester filaments|
|US4704329 *||Dec 17, 1986||Nov 3, 1987||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Annealed polyester filaments and a process for making them|
|US4950539 *||Oct 20, 1987||Aug 21, 1990||Viscosuisse Sa||Product and method of producing a smooth polyester yarn|
|US5076810 *||Aug 29, 1990||Dec 31, 1991||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Fabrics of polyester copolymer fibers: dyeing the heat set fabric|
|US5106685 *||Oct 6, 1988||Apr 21, 1992||Rhone-Poulenc Viscosuisse Sa||Process for manufacturing a smooth polyester yarn and yarn so obtained|
|US6210622||Jul 19, 1999||Apr 3, 2001||Arteva North America S.A.R.L.||Process of making polymeric fibers|
|US6287688||Mar 3, 2000||Sep 11, 2001||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Partially oriented poly(trimethylene terephthalate) yarn|
|US6333106||Mar 13, 2001||Dec 25, 2001||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Draw textured poly(trimethylene terephthalate) yarn|
|US6383632||Feb 28, 2001||May 7, 2002||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Fine denier yarn from poly (trimethylene terephthalate)|
|US6413631||May 4, 1998||Jul 2, 2002||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Process of open-end spinning of polyester staple fiber|
|US6458455||Aug 22, 2001||Oct 1, 2002||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Poly(trimethylene terephthalate) tetrachannel cross-section staple fiber|
|US6663806||Feb 28, 2001||Dec 16, 2003||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Processes for making poly (trimethylene terephthalate) yarns|
|US6672047||Feb 28, 2001||Jan 6, 2004||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Processes of preparing partially oriented and draw textured poly(trimethylene terephthalate) yarns|
|US6685859||Mar 1, 2001||Feb 3, 2004||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Processes for making poly(trimethylene terephthalate) yarn|
|US6752945||Aug 22, 2001||Jun 22, 2004||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Process for making poly(trimethylene terephthalate) staple fibers|
|US6835339||Jun 24, 2002||Dec 28, 2004||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Process for preparing poly(trimethylene terephthalate) tetrachannel cross-section staple fiber|
|US6872352||Aug 22, 2001||Mar 29, 2005||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Process of making web or fiberfill from polytrimethylene terephthalate staple fibers|
|US6998079||Dec 12, 2003||Feb 14, 2006||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Process of making partially oriented poly(trimethylene terephthalate) yarn|
|US7578957 *||Dec 10, 2003||Aug 25, 2009||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Process of making staple fibers|
|US20030071394 *||Jun 24, 2002||Apr 17, 2003||Hernandez Ismael A.||Process for preparing poly(trimethylene terephthalate) tetrachannel cross-section staple fiber|
|US20040134182 *||Dec 12, 2003||Jul 15, 2004||Howell James M.||Partially oriented poly(trimethylene terephthalate) yarn|
|US20040146711 *||Dec 10, 2003||Jul 29, 2004||Chang Jing C.||Staple fibers and processes for making same|
|US20090047857 *||Oct 27, 2008||Feb 19, 2009||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Staple fibers and processes for making same|
|USRE32741 *||Jun 4, 1987||Aug 30, 1988||Toray Industries, Inc.||Polyester fiber and method for the production thereof|
|DE102008051738A1||Oct 15, 2008||Apr 22, 2010||Trevira Gmbh||PTT-Faser mit verbesserter Einkräuselung|
|DE102011114237A1||Sep 23, 2011||Mar 28, 2013||Trevira Gmbh||Pillarme Polyesterfaser|
|DE102014004928A1||Apr 7, 2014||Oct 8, 2015||Trevira Gmbh||Polymerfaser rnit verbesserter Dispergierbarkeit|
|EP0125112A2 *||May 3, 1984||Nov 14, 1984||E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Improved process for annealing polyester filaments and new products thereof|
|EP0125112A3 *||May 3, 1984||Aug 27, 1986||E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Improved process for annealing polyester filaments and new products thereof|
|EP0165625A2 *||May 9, 1985||Dec 27, 1985||Capdevila Eugenio Calvete||Process for stretching synthetic filaments|
|EP0165625A3 *||May 9, 1985||May 6, 1987||Capdevila Eugenio Calvete||Process for stretching synthetic filaments|
|EP1579040A1 *||Dec 17, 2003||Sep 28, 2005||E.I.Du Pont de Nemours and Company||Staple fibers and processes for making same|
|EP1579040A4 *||Dec 17, 2003||Aug 19, 2009||Du Pont||Staple fibers and processes for making same|
|EP2169110A1||Sep 25, 2008||Mar 31, 2010||Trevira Gmbh||Fire-resistant hollow fibres with silicon-free soft grip apparatus|
|EP2177651A1||Oct 8, 2009||Apr 21, 2010||Trevira Gmbh||PTT fibre with improved curling|
|WO2013041183A1||Sep 5, 2012||Mar 28, 2013||Trevira Gmbh||Low-pill polyester fiber|
|U.S. Classification||528/295, 264/289.6, 264/290.5, 528/308.2, 528/305|